DOCSLIB.ORG

Differential Host Susceptibility to Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis, an Emerging Amphibian Pathogen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Differential Host Susceptibility to Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis, an Emerging Amphibian Pathogen Contributed Paper Differential Host Susceptibility to Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, an Emerging Amphibian Pathogen C. 1. SEARLE,*§ S. S. GERVASI,* ].HUA,#]. I. HAl\1MOND,# R.A. REL YRA..,# D. H. OLSON,t A.c�D A.R. BLAUSTEIN* *Depart.'1lent of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A. #Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, U.S.A. tUnited States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A. Abstract: The amphibian fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) has received considerable attention due to its role in amphibian population declines worldwide. Although many amphibian species appear to be affected by Bd, there is little information on species-specific dijJerences in susceptibility to this pathogen. We used a comparative experimental approach to examine Bd susceptibility in 6 amphibian species from the United States. We exposed postmetamorphic animals to Bd for 30 days and monitored mortality, feeding rates, and infection levels. In all species tested, Ed-exposed animals had higher rates of mortality than unexposed (control) animals. However, we found dijJerences in mortality rates among species even though the amount of Ed detected on the dijJerent species' bodies did not dijJer. Of the species tested, southern toads (Anaxyrusterrestris) and wood frogs (lithobates sylvaticus) had the highest rates of Ed-related mortality. Within species, we detected lower levels of Ed on individuals that survived longer and found that the relationship between body size and infection levels dijJered among species. Our results indicate that, even under identical conditions, amphibian species dijJer in susceptibility to Ed. This study represents a step toward identifying and understanding species variation in disease susceptibility, which can be used to optimize conservation strategies. Ke'ywords: amphibian population declines, Anaxyrus, chytridiomycosis, Hyla, Lithobates, Pseudacris, Rana Susceptibilidad Diferencial de Huespedes a Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, un Pat6geno de A..flfibios Emergente Resumen: El pat6geno fungico de anfibios Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Ed) ha recibido considerable atenci6n debido a su papel en fa declinaci6n de poblaciones de anfibios en todo el mundo. Aunque parece que muchas especies de anfibios son afectadas por Ed, existe poca informaci6n sobre diferencias especificas en fa susceptibilidad a este pat6geno. Utilizamos un metodo experimental comparativo para examinar fa susceptibilidad a Ed en 6 especies anfibios de los Estados Unidos. Expusimos a animates postmetam6rficos a Ed durante 30 dias y monitoreamos las tasas de mortalidad y de alimentaci6n, asi como los niveles de infecci6n. En todas las especies probadas, los animates expuestos a Ed tuvieron mayores tasas de mortalidad entre especies aunque fa cantidad de Bd detectada sobre los cuerpos de las diferentes especies no difiri6. De las especies probadas, Anaxyrus terrestris y Lithobates sylvaticus tuvieron las mayores tasas de mortali­ dad relacionada con Bd. Entre especies, detectamos niveles menores sobre indviduos que sobrevivieron mas tiempo y encontramos que la relaci6n entre el tamano del cuerpo y los niveles de infeccion difiri6 entre especies. Nuestros resultados indican que, aunque bajo condiciones identicas, las especies de anfibios di­ fieren en susceptibilidad a Ed y representan un paso hacia fa identificaci6n y comprensi6n de la variaci6n §email [email protected] Paper submitted September 13, 2010; revised manuscript accepted February 12, �OlL" 965 COl1�,en}ation Biology, Volume 25, No. 5, 965-974 ©2011 Society fer Conservation Biology DOl: lO.11l1lj.152H739.201101708.x entre especies de la susceptibilidad a enfermedades, que pueden ser utilizados para optimizar estrategias de conservaci6n. Palabras Clave: Anaxyrus, declinaciones de poblaciones de anfibios, Hyla, Lithobates, Pseudacris, quitrid­ iomicosis, Rana Introduction et aL 2005) and some species in Queensland (Kriger & Hero 2006), populations appear to be persisting in the Understanding patterns of host-pathogen dynamics is es­ presence of Bd. sential for mitigating the negative effectsof infectious dis­ Differential susceptibility to Bd observed in the field eases. In many cases, infectious diseases are studied in a may be due to multiple independent or interacting fac­ one-pathogen, one-host system, and little attention is paid tors, including host physiology, host life history, envi­ to how pathogens may affect different hosts. However, ronmental conditions, and community structure. For ex­ most pathogens can infect more than one species(Wool­ ample, in organisms other than amphibians, body size house et al. 2001), and hosts may differ in susceptibility has a large influence on pathogen prevalence and diver­ to a given pathogen. Differencesin host susceptibility can sity in hosts. Larger animals are predicted to have higher drive ecological phenomena such as pathogen dilution or pathogen loads because they provide more space for a pathogen amplification(Schmidt & Ostfeld 2001; LoGiu­ pathogen to colonize and usually are older and have had dice et al. 2003; Keesing et al. 2006). Additionally, some more time to acquire pathogens(Kuris et al. 1980; Poulin hosts may act as reservoirs for a disease. In the absence of 1995). In amphibians, smaller postmetamorphic animals a reservoir host, direct transmission of pathogens is gen­ can have higher levels of Bd than larger animals(Kriger erally density dependent(Nokes 1992). Reservoir hosts, et a1. 2007), but the opposite relation was found in lar­ however, allow a pathogen to persist even when the den­ vae in 2 studies(Smith et al. 2007; Symonds et al. 2007). sity of susceptible hosts is low, exacerbating the severity Seasonal changes in temperature can alter growth rates of disease epidemics(Haydon et al. 2002). Thus, under­ of pathogens and host responses, creating cyclical pat­ standing how different host species respond to infection terns in pathogen prevalence(Dowell 2001; Raffel et al. by a pathogen is essential for predicting its effects. It 2006). This may be particularly relevant for Bd because is clear that disease poses a substantial threat to some it is a cold-associated pathogen (Longcore et al. 1999; taxonomic groups as exemplified by global declines in Piotrowski et al. 2004). In the field, there is a greater in­ amphibian populations(Stuart et al. 2004). cidence of Bd in winter months compared with summer Global declines of amphibian populations have been months, and experimentally infecting ani..'llals at colder attributed to multiple factors, including infectious dis­ temperatures increases the negative effects of Bd(Berger eases(Houlahan et al. 2000; Blaustehl. & Kiesecker 2002; et aL 2004). Stuart et al. 2004). In particular, the emerging fungal Certain life-history strategies may increase rates of pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) is as­ pathogen transmission or growth. In a fieldsurvey, Kriger sociated with amphibian population declines worldwide and Hero (2007) found that stream-breeding amphibians (e.g., Lips et al. 2006; Skerratt et al. 2007; Vredenburg are more likely to be Lrliectedwith Bd than pond-breeders et al. 2010). This fungus i!'J'ects over 400 species (Aa­ and almost all infected animals occur in permanent wa­ nensen & Fisher 2011). Batrachochytrium dendroba­ ter bodies. Bielby et al. (2008) analyzed correlates of Bd­ tidis infects keratinized structures of amphibians such associated declines and found that high-elevation species that mouthparts of larvae are infected, but postmetamor­ with restricted ranges are most likely to experience Bd­ phic amphibians can be infected over their entire epider­ related declines. These patterns provide valuable infor­ mis(Marantelli et al. 2004; Berger et al. 2005). Therefore, mation for predicting future declines, but it is difficult rates of mortalityfrom Bd appear to be more pronounced to consider all factors in one study. In a laboratory ex­ at the postmetamorphic stage (parris & Cornelius 2004; periment, we investigated the degree to which species Berger et al. 2005; Carey et al. 2006), when Bd disrupts of amphibians were negatively affected by Ed, which al­ various physiological functions(Voyles et al. 2009). The lowed us to address causation in addition to correlation. effects of Ed on amphibian populations in the wild ap­ The few researchers who have tested amphibian sus­ pear to vary among species and locations. For example, ceptibilic), to Bd have done so with few species or with mass die-offs associated with Bd have occurred in Califor­ larval animals. Larvae of 4 species of anurans(frogs and nia and Colorado(U.S.A.) (Muths et al. 2003; Vredenburg toads) exposed to Bd had different levels of mortality and et al. 2010), Queensland, Australia (Berger et al. 1998), mouthpart pigmentation(Blaustein et aL 2005). Suscep­ and throughout Panama CLips et al. 2006). In contrast, in tibility of juvenile or adult amphibians to Bd has been other locations including South Carolina(U.S.A.) (Daszak examined in 3 or fewer species at a time (Nichols et al. Conservation Biology Vciume 25, No.5, 2011 Searleet al. 967 2001; Daszak et al. 2004; Garcia et al. 2006). We tested crickets that we based on the average size of the species the susceptibility to Bd of 6 anuran species shortly after (1 cricket/O.l g body mass). Due to differences in breed­ metamorphosis. We monitored mortality, infection lev­ ing phenology,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spotted Chorus Frog
    This Article From Reptile & Amphibian Profiles From February, 2005 The Cross Timbers Herpetologist Newsletter of the Dallas-Fort Worth Herpetological Society Dallas-Fort Worth Herpetological Society is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organiza- tion whose mission is: To promote understanding, appreciation, and conservation Spotted Chorus Frog ( Pseudacris clarkii ) of reptiles and amphibians, to encourage respect for their By Michael Smith habitats, and to foster respon- Texas winters can be cold, with biting loud for a frog of such small size. As the frogs sible captive care. winds and the occasional ice storm. But Texas brace against prairie grasses in the shallow wa- winters are often like the tiny north Texas ter, the throats of the males expand into an air- towns of Santo or Venus – you see them com- filled sac and call “wrret…wrret…wrret” to All articles and photos remain ing down the road, but if you blink twice nearby females. under the copyright of the au- you’ve missed them. And so, by February we Spotted chorus frogs are among the small thor and photographer. This often have sunny days where a naturalist’s and easily overlooked herps of our area, but publication may be redistributed thoughts turn to springtime. Those earliest they are beautiful animals with interesting life- in its original form, but to use the sunny days remind us that life and color will article or photos, please contact: return to the fields and woods. styles. [email protected] In late February or early March, spring Classification rains begin, and water collects in low places.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Frog (Rana Sylvatica): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project March 24, 2005 Erin Muths1, Suzanne Rittmann1, Jason Irwin2, Doug Keinath3, Rick Scherer4 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, 2150 Centre Ave. Bldg C, Fort Collins, CO 80526 2 Department of Biology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837 3 Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, P.O. Box 3381, Laramie, WY 82072 4 Colorado State University, GDPE, Fort Collins, CO 80524 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Muths, E., S. Rittman, J. Irwin, D. Keinath, and R. Scherer. (2005, March 24). Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/woodfrog.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the help of the many people who contributed time and answered questions during our review of the literature. AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES Dr. Erin Muths is a Zoologist with the U.S. Geological Survey – Fort Collins Science Center. She has been studying amphibians in Colorado and the Rocky Mountain Region for the last 10 years. Her research focuses on demographics of boreal toads, wood frogs and chorus frogs and methods research. She is a principle investigator for the USDOI Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative and is an Associate Editor for the Northwestern Naturalist. Dr. Muths earned a B.S. in Wildlife Ecology from the University of Wisconsin, Madison (1986); a M.S. in Biology (Systematics and Ecology) from Kansas State University (1990) and a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Status of the Illinois Chorus Frog
    ILLINOI S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007. Population status of the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) in Madison County, Illinois: Results of 1994 surveys IDOT CONTRACT 1-5-90179 FINAL REPORT ON 1994 RESULTS John K. Tucker Center for Aquatic Ecology Illinois Natural History Survey 4134 Alby Street Alton, Illinois 62002 and David P. Philipp Center for Aquatic Ecology Illinois Natural History Survey 607 E. Peabody Champaign, Illinois 61781 December 1995 J. K. Tucker Dr. David P. Philipp Co-Principal Investigator Co-Principal Investigator Center for Aquatic Ecology Center for Aquatic Ecology Illinois Natural History Survey Illinois Natural History Survey DISCLAIMER The findings, conclusions, and views expressed herein are those of the researchers and should not be considered as the official position of the Illinois Department of Transportation. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SUPPORT This research (contract number 1-5-90179) was funded by the Illinois Department of Transportation. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A study of the biology of the Illinois chorus frog, Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis, is reported. Surveys of Madison County for choruses of the frogs located seven choruses. Choruses previously reported at Granite City and South Roxana were not relocated and are thought to be extirpated. We estimated population size to be 420 frogs in April 1994 with a juvenile survivorship of 4.5%. Mean distance for 20 recaptured frogs from point of initial capture was 0.52 km with a range of 0 to 0.9 km. Habitat preference for 48 frogs found on roads appeared to be for old field habitats in preference to areas of agriculture or lawns.
    [Show full text]
  • Species of Greatest Conservation Need Species Accounts
    2 0 1 5 – 2 0 2 5 Species of Greatest Conservation Need Species Accounts Appendix 1.4C-Amphibians Amphibian Species of Greatest Conservation Need Maps: Physiographic Provinces and HUC Watersheds Species Accounts (Click species name below or bookmark to navigate to species account) AMPHIBIANS Eastern Hellbender Northern Ravine Salamander Mountain Chorus Frog Mudpuppy Eastern Mud Salamander Upland Chorus Frog Jefferson Salamander Eastern Spadefoot New Jersey Chorus Frog Blue-spotted Salamander Fowler’s Toad Western Chorus Frog Marbled Salamander Northern Cricket Frog Northern Leopard Frog Green Salamander Cope’s Gray Treefrog Southern Leopard Frog The following Physiographic Province and HUC Watershed maps are presented here for reference with conservation actions identified in the species accounts. Species account authors identified appropriate Physiographic Provinces or HUC Watershed (Level 4, 6, 8, 10, or statewide) for specific conservation actions to address identified threats. HUC watersheds used in this document were developed from the Watershed Boundary Dataset, a joint project of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Physiographic Provinces Central Lowlands Appalachian Plateaus New England Ridge and Valley Piedmont Atlantic Coastal Plain Appalachian Plateaus Central Lowlands Piedmont Atlantic Coastal Plain New England Ridge and Valley 675| Appendix 1.4 Amphibians Lake Erie Pennsylvania HUC4 and HUC6 Watersheds Eastern Lake Erie
    [Show full text]
  • AMPHIBIANS of OHIO F I E L D G U I D E DIVISION of WILDLIFE INTRODUCTION
    AMPHIBIANS OF OHIO f i e l d g u i d e DIVISION OF WILDLIFE INTRODUCTION Amphibians are typically shy, secre- Unlike reptiles, their skin is not scaly. Amphibian eggs must remain moist if tive animals. While a few amphibians Nor do they have claws on their toes. they are to hatch. The eggs do not have are relatively large, most are small, deli- Most amphibians prefer to come out at shells but rather are covered with a jelly- cately attractive, and brightly colored. night. like substance. Amphibians lay eggs sin- That some of these more vulnerable spe- gly, in masses, or in strings in the water The young undergo what is known cies survive at all is cause for wonder. or in some other moist place. as metamorphosis. They pass through Nearly 200 million years ago, amphib- a larval, usually aquatic, stage before As with all Ohio wildlife, the only ians were the first creatures to emerge drastically changing form and becoming real threat to their continued existence from the seas to begin life on land. The adults. is habitat degradation and destruction. term amphibian comes from the Greek Only by conserving suitable habitat to- Ohio is fortunate in having many spe- amphi, which means dual, and bios, day will we enable future generations to cies of amphibians. Although generally meaning life. While it is true that many study and enjoy Ohio’s amphibians. inconspicuous most of the year, during amphibians live a double life — spend- the breeding season, especially follow- ing part of their lives in water and the ing a warm, early spring rain, amphib- rest on land — some never go into the ians appear in great numbers seemingly water and others never leave it.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Chorus Frog (Pseudacris Triseriata), Great Lakes/ St
    PROPOSED Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for the Western Chorus Frog (Pseudacris triseriata), Great Lakes/ St. Lawrence – Canadian Shield Population, in Canada Western Chorus Frog 2014 1 Recommended citation: Environment Canada. 2014. Recovery Strategy for the Western Chorus Frog (Pseudacris triseriata), Great Lakes / St. Lawrence – Canadian Shield Population, in Canada [Proposed], Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series, Environment Canada, Ottawa, v + 46 pp For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, including COSEWIC Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry (www.sararegistry.gc.ca). Cover illustration: © Raymond Belhumeur Également disponible en français sous le titre « Programme de rétablissement de la rainette faux-grillon de l’Ouest (Pseudacris triseriata), population des Grands Lacs et Saint-Laurent et du Bouclier canadien, au Canada [Proposition] » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2014. All rights reserved. ISBN Catalogue no. Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. Recovery Strategy for the Western Chorus Frog 2014 (Great Lakes / St. Lawrence – Canadian Shield Population) PREFACE The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996) agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of recovery strategies for listed Extirpated, Endangered, and Threatened species and are required to report on progress within five years of the publication of the final document on the Species at Risk Public Registry.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Population Inventory of Amphibians on the Mountain Longleaf National Wildlife Refuge and Screening for the Amphibian Disease Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis
    Baseline Population Inventory of Amphibians on the Mountain Longleaf National Wildlife Refuge and Screening for the Amphibian Disease Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis This study was funded by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Southeast Region Inventory and Monitoring Network FY 2012 September 2013 Gregory Scull1 Chester Figiel1 Mark Meade2 Richard Watkins2 1U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2Jacksonville State University, Jacksonville, Alabama The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Introduction: Amphibians are facing worldwide population declines, range contractions, and species extinction. Within the last 30 years, over 200 species have become extinct and close to one-third of the world’s amphibians are imperiled (IUCN, 2010). A recent trend analysis indicates that amphibian decline may be even more widespread and severe than previously realized and includes species for which there has been little conservation concern or assessment focus in the past (Adams et al. 2013). Factors such as invasive species, disease, changes in land use, climate change effects and the interactions of these factors all form current hypotheses that attempt to explain this dilemma (McCallum, 2007). This is alarming considering that the Southeast contains the highest level of amphibian diversity in the United States. It is imperative that we obtain and maintain current information on amphibian communities inhabiting our public lands so that we can adaptively manage resources for their long-term survival. Although a number of causes appear related to amphibian declines in recent years, one of the leading factors is the infectious disease known as chytridiomycosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Hill FIELD GUIDE
    Forest Hill FIELD GUIDE FOREST HILL ALMA COLLEGE GIRESD ii • Forest Hill History • Forest Hill Nature Area www.GratiotConservationDistrict.org Forest Hill Nature Area, located in northern Gratiot County, Michigan, is land that has been set aside for the preservation and appreciation of the natural world. The nature area has walking trails through 90 acres of gently rolling hills, open fields, wetlands, Let children walk with nature. Let them see the beautiful blendings willow thickets, and woodlots. Forest Hill Nature Area is home to a and communions of death and life. Their joys inseparable unity. As variety of wildlife such as white-tailed deer, muskrats, ducks and taught in woods and meadows. Plains and mountains. And turkeys. streams. -John Muir Also, over the years, some farm buildings were demolished while others were renovated. The Nature Area has evolved into an Forest Hill Nature Area: important outdoor educational resource for the school children in Gratiot and Isabella Counties as well as the citizens of Mid- In 1992, the Gratiot County Soil Conservation District acquired a Michigan. Since 1993, thousands of school children and adults 90 acre abandoned farm from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. have participated in field trips and nature programs at Forest Hill In 1993, the District leased the property to the Gratiot-Isabella Nature Area. RESD to develop an outdoor education center. The RESD named the property, the Forest Hill Nature Area and in partnership with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service began a major wetland restoration project. 3 Digital Nature Trail Forest Hill is brimming with biodiversity and all it entails: succession, evolution, adaptation, wildlife and food chains.
    [Show full text]
  • Albemarle County Biodiversity: a Report on Its History, Current Conditions, and Threats, with Strategies for Future Protection
    Albemarle County Biodiversity: A Report on its History, Current Conditions, and Threats, with Strategies for Future Protection Prepared by the Albemarle County Biodiversity Work Group October 2004 Dan Bieker - Ornithologist, Piedmont Virginia Community College Instructor Stephen Bowler, MS – Former Watershed Manager, Albemarle County; Graduate Research Assistant, Virginia Tech Tom Dierauf, Master of Forestry Ruth Douglas, Ph.D. - Invasive Plant Coordinator, Virginia Native Plant Society; Professor Emerita, Piedmont Virginia Community College Michael Erwin, Ph.D. - Research Professor, University of Virginia Department of Environmental Sciences; Wildlife Biologist, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Chris French – Former Conservation Technician, Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Conservation District David Hannah, MS – Piedmont Environmental Council (former staff) John Hermsmeier - Director, Environmental Education Center Kenneth R. Lawless, Ph.D. - Professor Emeritus, University of Virginia Department of Materials Science & Engineering; Ornithologist, Field Botanist, Nature Photographer Tom Olivier, Ph.D. - Green Creek Paradigms, LLC G. Carleton Ray, Ph.D. - Research Professor, University of Virginia Department of Environmental Sciences John Scrivani, Ph.D. – Virginia Department of Forestry; Ivy Creek Foundation Board of Directors Charles E. Stevens - Field Botanist and Ornithologist; Virginia Botanical Associates Coordinated and Edited by Scott Clark - Senior Planner, Albemarle County Community Development Department 1 Acknowledgements
    [Show full text]
  • Upland Chorus Frog
    Upland Chorus Frog Upland Chorus Frog (Pseudacris triseriata feriarum) - Pl.33 Identification: 3/4" - 1 1/2". The ground color of the feriarum subspecies of Western Chorus Frog varies from brown to gray. Key characteristics are a light stripe on the upper lip and a dark stripe through the eye that runs down the flank to the groin. In addition, three thin dark stripes or rows of small spots down the back are usually present, but this feature is variable. There is usually a dark triangle between the eyes, but it may be faint. There are usually dark flecks on the otherwise cream-colored breast. Toe discs are small. Where to find them: Variety of habitats. Breeds in swamps and vernal pools. When to find them: Breeds from February to May. Voice: Regularly repeated creaking sound, like someone running their nails over the teeth of a comb. Range: Northern Region: Sussex, Warren, Hunterdon, Morris, northwestern Bergen, and western Somerset and Passaic Counties. Note: The Upland Chorus Frog and New Jersey Chorus Frog are currently considered to be subspecies of the Western Chorus Frog (Pseudacris triseriata). They are best distinguished from each other by the region of the state in which they are found, and by the thickness and continuity of the three stripes on the back. Upland Chorus Frog (Pseudacris triseriata feriarum) - text pg. 41 Key Features - Brown or gray in color. - Dark stripe runs from snout to groin through eye. - Three dark stripes present down back. - Dark Triangle may be present between eyes. New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife ~ 2002 Excerpt from: “Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of New Jersey” Order the complete guide at - http://www.state.nj.us/dep/fgw/products.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetological Diversity of Stemler Cave Nature Preserve, St. Clair County, Illinois
    Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science received 1/9/16 (2016) Volume 109, pp. 19-23 accepted 2/19/16 Herpetological Diversity of Stemler Cave Nature Preserve, St. Clair County, Illinois Robert G. Weck Southwestern Illinois College, 2500 Carlyle Ave, Belleville IL 62221 [email protected] ABSTRACT Stemler Cave is a biologically diverse ecosystem located in southwestern St. Clair County, IL. The primary entrance to the cave and the surrounding wooded sinkhole is a dedicated Illinois nature preserve. Here I report the results of ten years of observations on the herpeto- logical diversity of Stemler Cave Nature Preserve, which include 26 species of amphibians and reptiles. Seventeen species were recorded from the entrance or interior of the cave. The most diverse group were frogs and toads with 11 documented species. Two salamander species, four turtle species, one lizard species, and eight species of snakes were recorded in Stemler Cave Nature Preserve. INTRODUCTION Figure 1. Topographic map showing Stemler Cave Nature Preserve (SCNP) is a the Stemler Karst Natural Area (black privately-owned, dedicated Illinois nature boundary), which is defined by the wa- preserve in southwestern St. Clair County. tershed boundary of Stemler Cave. The Located in the larger Stemler Karst Illinois location of Stemler Cave Nature Preserve Natural Areas Inventory site (Figure 1) of is indicated by the black square. Inset southwestern Illinois, the preserve consists aerial photo shows the preserve bound- of an approximately 0.35 ha steep-sided ary in black. The wooded area south of wooded sinkhole that includes the prima- SCNP is Stemler Cave Woods Nature ry entrance to Stemler Cave and a short Preserve.
    [Show full text]