The Distribution and Status of the Rhinoceros, Dicerorhinus Sumatrensis, in Borneo—A Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Distribution and Status of the Rhinoceros, Dicerorhinus Sumatrensis, in Borneo—A Review The distribution and status of the rhinoceros, sum Dicerorhinus atrensis, in Borneo — a review by L.C. Rookmaaker Dokter Guepinlaan 23, Ommeren, The Netherlands Abstract ces to the rhinoceros. The following is an attempt In the second half of the 19th century, the rhinoceros occurred to collect these. northwestern throughout Borneo except southern Sarawak, For the latitudes and longitudes of the localities Kalimantan and some parts of southern Kalimantan. The I refer to "Atlas van Nederland" animal coastal and other areas tropisch was extinct in the populated may in about 1930, especially in the southern part of Kaliman- (anonymous, 1938) and "Gazetteerno. 13" (anon- scattered tan. Presently some small populations remain, over ymous, 1955). the Sarawak interior (if the rhinoceros survives at all there), northeastern Sabah, possibly also southern Sabah and around DISTRIBUTION Mt. Kinabalu, and the interior of Central and East Kali- It mantan. is estimated that some 15 to rhinos are still Some distribution the whole island 25 maps covering alive in Borneo. were published earlier. According to Guggisberg INTRODUCTION Since 1840 the rhinoceros is known to inhabit Borneo, but agreement about its specific identity reached until was not 1895 (Rookmaaker, 1977). The Bornean rhinoceros is presently regarded as a subspecies of the two-horned Sumatran kind, Di- cerorhinus sumatrensis harrissoni (Groves, 1965). Erroneous beliefs in the aphrodisiacal and me- dicinal of rhinoceros properties many parts, espe- cially its horn, have reduced the animal to near- extinction. Protective laws are available (Chin, is 1971; Van Strien, 1974: 62-63) and generally it tried to practice them, but the difficulties are great. The survival of the rhinoceros to this day is mainly due to its occurrence in remote and uninhabitable regions. Consequently, studying it in the field, al- becomes hard has been though necessary, very as experienced in supposedly better populated areas in Sumatra and Malaysia. Map 1. Sketch-map of Borneo showing the rhinoceros distri- Therefore, the literature on Borneo remains as bution. ......... political boundaries; — possibleboundary the source to establish the only practical present of distribution ca. 1850; ------ approximate boundaries of which rhinoceros populations be and former distribution of the rhinoceros there. areas in can expected today. Fossil evidence shown as F1 (Niah cave), and F2 (Bau); More written statements about Borneo exist than rhinoceros became around d shows areas where the extinct but include rather few referen- one supposes, they 1930. Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 06:20:20AM via free access 198 L. C. ROOKMAAKER - THE RHINOCEROS IN BORNEO (1966: 104), the animal lived throughout Borneo and Loch (1937: 145). Lydekker used the incor- in 1850, but "presently" only in northern Sarawak rect criteria of Busk (1869) to identify the teeth. and in East Kutai Therefore (unconfirmed) Kotawaringin, Hooijer (1945: 253; 1946a: 10) sus- and along the Reyang river. Groves (1967: 225) pected that they in fact belonged to D. sumatrensis, shows localities of some museum specimens. Krum- which was later confirmed by Medway (1965b: and Groves Kurt biegel (I960: 16, left) & (1972: 80, pl. XXI) who, unlike Hooijer, was able to fig. 4) doubt the former distribution in southern inspect the actual specimens. and Van Strien's Busk southwestern parts. maps (1974: (1869) discussed two further second exhibit the records he could find in the molars from Sarawak but their is 33, 34) upper origin literature. His of the shows unknown map present occurrence (Rookmaaker, 1977). Mt. Kinabalu and the East Kutai reserve. 1.2. Recent records Northern Sarawak: 1. SARAWAK Harrisson (1949: 71): formerly upper Limbang, especially 1.1. Fossil records Mt. Batu Lawi. — Banks (1931: 19): Lawas interior. — Banks (1935: 329): Mt. Mulu; none there in 1946 (Har- The excavations in the Niah cave have unearthed risson, 1949: 71). — Harrisson (1949: 71; 1955: 134; fossil rhinoceros material in several the 1956: Kelabit "within layers, 264): plateau living memory", or near Raya river. oldest with 14 183 cm deep corresponding a C date of 30,673 ± 700 B.C. years (upper pleisto- Upper Baram river: The material has been discussed Har- cene). by Banks (1931: 19), Harrisson (1949: 71): Baram district. risson (1957: 164, pi. Pb; 1961b: 90) and Med- — Harrisson (1956: 264): 79 rhinos killed in Baram district, — Arnold on 1964: 1925-1931. (1959: 94): hunting way (1958; 1959: 157-158; 37; especially first half Usun Apau plateau, 20th century; no traces in 1965b: 77-79). The fragments must belong to 1959. — Mjöberg (1929: 68): Mt. Murud, 1922. — D. of be sumatrensis, although none them can Cambridge Zoological Museum, no. 6383: Mt. Kalulong, Baram district; donated by Hose in 1896 (Groves & Kurt, identified unequivocally. A tendency to decrease 1972: fig. 2). — Cambridge Zoological Museum, no. in size from the pleistocene to the average present, 6381: Baram district; donated by Hose in 1898 (Groves, demonstrated in — several large mammals, has been in litt., June 1975). Sarawak Museum, Kuching, no. 64.19: lower jaw from Baram in described for Rhinoceros sondaicus Desmarest, (Chin, litt., February 1976) . 1822, by Hooijer (1946a: 27; 1946b). Similarly, Sumatran of recent teeth D. sumatrensis are nor- Reyang river: smaller than from that mally the subfossil ones Wallace (1874), Bartlett (1891), Banks (1931: 19), Harrisson (1965: 102): course of Reyang river. — island (Hooijer, 1946a: 16-29), which Sody upper Harrisson (1955: 134), Chin (in litt., February 1976): (1946) named D. s. eugenei. There is some evi- Baleh, upper Reyang river; front horn confiscated (Sarawak dence for similar — a trend towards size diminution Museum, Kuching, no. 59/64). Banks (1931: 19): strays in ulus Oya and Mukah !). — Sarawak Museum, in Borneo material (Medway, 1965b: 81; Groves no. 64.20: Jalat, 1926 (Chin, in litt., February 1976). — & Kurt, 1972: 3), but it is insufficient to draw Sarawak Museum: several skulls and horns from Reyang certain any conclusions. district (Bartlett, 1891; Chin, in litt., February 1976). The British Museum received in 1884, from Southern Sarawak: P. L. Sclater, some fossil rhinoceros bones and Banks (1931: 19): never found "on the left bank of the in upper molars, found an alluvial cave deposit Rejang or down into Saribas and Sarawak proper", cf. Bau (upper pleistocene?) near in southwestern Gomes (1911: 149) and Low (1848). Only fossil remains from Bau (see § 1.1). Sarawak, at a depth of some 20 m (Beccari, 1904: 135; Medway, 1965b: — not at Paku 80) (Banks, 1.3. Conclusion The skeleton 1931: 21). was catalogued under In the this first decennia of century the species D. sumatrensis, but the molars (British Museum occurred from the Lawas interior in the north M. (Natural History) cat. no. 1968) were "pro- (ca 04°30'N) southward along the border with visionally referred to" R. sondaicus (cf. Lydekker, 1886: 129), as was noted by Banks (1931: 21) !) ulu = headwaters. Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 06:20:20AM via free access BIJDRAGEN TOT DE DIERKUNDE, 47 (2) - 1977 199 Baram and ulu Kin a a Kalimantan (ulu Reyang). The Upper bat n g a n : Harrisson Kina- regions nearer to the coast were inhabited formerly (1956: 265), Burgess (1961: 150): upper batangan river. — in a conviction in Burgess (loc. cit.): 1958 (fossil evidence Niah) but in more recent times in Ranau for illegally shooting a rhinoceros. only occasionally. The rhinoceros recently did not Western Sabah: occur south of the Reyang river, but again fossil Sandilands (1974): Tambunan man told him that permits remains were found there, at Bau. to shoot one specimen were sold for $ 25 between 1903 and 1928. He found tracks in the ulu Karamuak in I960, but none in 1974. — Harrisson (1956: 265): around Mt. 2. SABAH Trus Madi and eastward to the Kinabatangan river, asserted officials by government in 1952; no traces there in 1956. 2.1. Recent records — Harrisson (1956: 266): Pretyman shot a rhinoceros General: — near Kota Kinabalu, early this century. British Museum (Natural History), no. 1875.8.9.18.: mainland opposite Raffles Museum, Singapore: North Borneo, donated by Labuan Island, according to Jentink (1884: 556); possibly Rowe in 1901 (Hanitsch, 1908: 8). — Bristol City Mu- incorrect. seum, no. A. 1031: "British Borneo" (Groves, in litt., June 1975). — De Silva (1968: 145): one seen by Northwestern Sabah: member of Forest Department in 1957. — De Silva (in Medway (1965a: 155): J. L. Harrison saw tracks on Mt. litt., June 1975): one seen in 1969 and evidence of Kinabalu — in 1962. Corner (1964: 17, 20): Mt. Kinabalu, rhinoceros found in 1971 and 1974. 8,000 feet, toothmarks on bark of a tree; a few animals 10,000 feet — Sandakan district: expected on eastern ridge. Jenkins (1971: 177), Harroy (1971: 337), Van Strien (1974: 34): Mt. Pryer (1881: 394): specimens and tracks often seen near Kinabalu, based — on Corner and Medway. Museum Sandakan. — shot Burbidge (1880: 302): young on Saga- specimen from Mt. Kinabalu incorrectly shown on the liad river, 20 miles from Sandakan, by T. S. Dobree. — in Groves Van Strien map (1967: 225), repeated by (1974: Harrisson (1956: 266-267): in 1889 H. Edgar Hughes 31). — Jenkins (1971: 177): unauthenticated record from shot one along the lower ( ?) Kinabatangan river. — Mt. Tambuyokan in 1970. — Evans (1922: 58): occasion- Several specimens were sent to European musea from "in the which from Kinabalu in the ally seen range runs Sandakan in the cf. Rookmaaker 19th century, (1977: 59). direction of Kudat." — No 20th century records from this region. 2.2. Conclusion Northeastern Sabah: Formerly the rhinoceros was probably distributed Harrisson (1949: 71; 1965: 102): some survivors in north- throughout Sabah. Reports from the first half of eastern Sabah. — Burgess (1961: 150): Darvel bay forests this are almost nonexistent. it and Dent peninsula; in 1958 indications of illegal hunting century Presently in the Darvel bay district.
Recommended publications
  • Forest, Resources and People in Bulungan Elements for a History of Settlement, Trade, and Social Dynamics in Borneo, 1880-2000
    CIFOR Forest, Resources and People in Bulungan Elements for a History of Settlement, Trade, and Social Dynamics in Borneo, 1880-2000 Bernard Sellato Forest, Resources and People in Bulungan Elements for a History of Settlement, Trade and Social Dynamics in Borneo, 1880-2000 Bernard Sellato Cover Photo: Hornbill carving in gate to Kenyah village, East Kalimantan by Christophe Kuhn © 2001 by Center for International Forestry Research All rights reserved. Published in 2001 Printed by SMK Grafika Desa Putera, Indonesia ISBN 979-8764-76-5 Published by Center for International Forestry Research Mailing address: P.O. Box 6596 JKPWB, Jakarta 10065, Indonesia Office address: Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede, Sindang Barang, Bogor Barat 16680, Indonesia Tel.: +62 (251) 622622; Fax: +62 (251) 622100 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.cifor.cgiar.org Contents Acknowledgements vi Foreword vii 1. Introduction 1 2. Environment and Population 5 2.1 One Forested Domain 5 2.2 Two River Basins 7 2.3 Population 9 Long Pujungan District 9 Malinau District 12 Comments 13 3. Tribes and States in Northern East Borneo 15 3.1 The Coastal Polities 16 Bulungan 17 Tidung Sesayap 19 Sembawang24 3.2 The Stratified Groups 27 The Merap 28 The Kenyah 30 3.3 The Punan Groups 32 Minor Punan Groups 32 The Punan of the Tubu and Malinau 33 3.4 One Regional History 37 CONTENTS 4. Territory, Resources and Land Use43 4.1 Forest and Resources 44 Among Coastal Polities 44 Among Stratified Tribal Groups 46 Among Non-Stratified Tribal Groups 49 Among Punan Groups 50 4.2 Agricultural Patterns 52 Rice Agriculture 53 Cash Crops 59 Recent Trends 62 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Through Central Borneo
    LIBRARY v.. BOOKS BY CARL LUMHOLTZ THKODOH CENTRAL BORNEO NEW TRAILS IN MEXICO AMONG CANNIBALS Ea(k Profuitly llluilraUd CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS THROUGH CENTRAL BORNEO 1. 1>V lutKSi « AKI. J-lMHol,!/. IN IMK HI 1 N<. AN U H THROUGH CENTRAL BORNEO AN ACCOUNT OF TWO YEARS' TRAVEL IN THE LAND OF THE HEAD-HUNTERS BETWEEN THE YEARS 1913 AND 1917 BY ^ i\^ ^'^'' CARL LUMHOLTZ IfEMBER OF THE SOaETY OF SCIENCES OF CHRISTIANIA, NORWAY GOLD MEDALLIST OF THE NORWEGIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCTETY ASSOCIE ETRANGER DE LA SOCIETE DE L'ANTHROPOLOGIE DE PARIS, ETC. WITH ILLUSTRATIONS FROM PHOTOGRAPHS BY THE AUTHOR AND WITH MAP VOLUME I NEW YORK CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS 1920 COPYKICBT, IMO. BY CHARLF.'; '^CRIBN'ER'S SONS Publubed Sepcembcr, IMU We may safely affirm that the better specimens of savages are much superior to the lower examples of civilized peoples. Alfred Russel ffallace. PREFACE Ever since my camping life with the aborigines of Queensland, many years ago, it has been my desire to explore New Guinea, the promised land of all who are fond of nature and ambitious to discover fresh secrets. In furtherance of this purpose their Majesties, the King and Queen of Norway, the Norwegian Geographical So- ciety, the Royal Geographical Society of London, and Koninklijk Nederlandsch Aardrijkskundig Genootschap, generously assisted me with grants, thus facilitating my efforts to raise the necessary funds. Subscriptions were received in Norway, also from American and English friends, and after purchasing the principal part of my outfit in London, I departed for New York in the au- tumn of 1913, en route for the Dutch Indies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mantle Structure and Tectonic History of SE Asia
    Nature and Demise of the Proto-South China Sea ROBERT HALL, H. TIM BREITFELD SE Asia Research Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, United Kingdom Abstract: The term Proto-South China Sea has been used in a number of different ways. It was originally introduced to describe oceanic crust that formerly occupied the region north of Borneo where the modern South China Sea is situated. This oceanic crust was inferred to have been Mesozoic, and to have been eliminated by subduction beneath Borneo. Subduction was interpreted to have begun in Early Cenozoic and terminated in the Miocene. Subsequently the term was also used for inferred oceanic crust, now disappeared, of quite different age, notably that interpreted to have been subducted during the Late Cretaceous below Sarawak. More recently, some authors have considered that southeast-directed subduction continued until much later in the Neogene than originally proposed, based on the supposition that the NW Borneo Trough and Palawan Trough are, or were recently, sites of subduction. Others have challenged the existence of the Proto-South China Sea completely, or suggested it was much smaller than envisaged when the term was introduced. We review the different usage of the term and the evidence for subduction, particularly under Sabah. We suggest that the term Proto-South China Sea should be used only for the slab subducted beneath Sabah and Cagayan between the Eocene and Early Miocene. Oceanic crust subducted during earlier episodes of subduction in other areas should be named differently and we use the term Paleo- Pacific Ocean for lithosphere subducted under Borneo in the Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • PROCEEDINGS, INDONESIAN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION Forty-First Annual Convention & Exhibition, May 2017
    IPA17-722-G PROCEEDINGS, INDONESIAN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION Forty-First Annual Convention & Exhibition, May 2017 “SOME NEW INSIGHTS TO TECTONIC AND STRATIGRAPHIC EVOLUTION OF THE TARAKAN SUB-BASIN, NORTH EAST KALIMANTAN, INDONESIA” Sudarmono* Angga Direza* Hade Bakda Maulin* Andika Wicaksono* INTRODUCTION in Tarakan island and Sembakung and Bangkudulis in onshore Northeast Kalimantan. This paper will discuss the tectonic and stratigraphic evolution of the Tarakan sub-basin, primarily the On the other side, although the depositional setting fluvio-deltaic deposition during the Neogene time. in the Tarakan sub-basin is deltaic which is located The Tarakan sub-basin is part of a sub-basin complex to the north of the Mahakam delta, people tend to use which includes the Tidung, Berau, and Muaras sub- the Mahakam delta as a reference to discuss deltaic basins located in Northeast Kalimantan. In this depositional systems. This means that the Mahakam paper, the discussion about the Tarakan sub-basin delta is more understood than the delta systems in the also includes the Tidung sub-basin. The Tarakan sub- Tarakan sub-basin. The Mahakam delta is single basin is located a few kilometers to the north of the sourced by the Mahakam river which has been famous Mahakam delta. To the north, the Tarakan depositing a stacked deltaic sedimentary package in sub-basin is bounded by the Sampoerna high and to one focus area to the Makasar Strait probably since the south it is bounded by the Mangkalihat high. The the Middle Miocene. The deltaic depositional setting Neogene fluvio-deltaic sediment in the Tarakan sub- is confined by the Makasar Strait which is in such a basin is thinning to the north to the Sampoerna high way protecting the sedimentary package not to and to the south to the Mangkalihat high.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Mapping of Sabah, Malaysia, Using Airborne Gravity Survey
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 05, 2021 Geological Mapping of Sabah, Malaysia, Using Airborne Gravity Survey Fauzi Nordin, Ahmad; Jamil, Hassan; Noor Isa, Mohd; Mohamed, Azhari; Hj. Tahir, Sanudin; Musta, Baba ; Forsberg, René; Olesen, Arne Vestergaard; Nielsen, Jens Emil; Majid A. Kadir, Abd Total number of authors: 13 Published in: Borneo Science, The Journal of Science and Technology Publication date: 2016 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Fauzi Nordin, A., Jamil, H., Noor Isa, M., Mohamed, A., Hj. Tahir, S., Musta, B., Forsberg, R., Olesen, A. V., Nielsen, J. E., Majid A. Kadir, A., Fahmi Abd Majid, A., Talib, K., & Aman Sulaiman, S. (2016). Geological Mapping of Sabah, Malaysia, Using Airborne Gravity Survey. Borneo Science, The Journal of Science and Technology, 37(2), 14-27. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forests Dialogue Food, Fuel, Fiber and Forests (4Fs) Indonesia Field Dialogue Central Kalimantan, Indonesia | 16-19 March 2014
    The Forests Dialogue Food, Fuel, Fiber and Forests (4Fs) Indonesia Field Dialogue Central Kalimantan, Indonesia | 16-19 March 2014 FIELD TRIP SITE INFORMATION Map of the locations Community forest in Buntoi Tenure (Who owns the land? Who manage the land?) The community considers that they own the land. Part of the land is privately owned, viz. rubber and fruit gardens and areas for rice cultivation. Forest is communally owned. However the community has no official documents to prove their rights. Only recently did they receive a permit from the Ministry of Forestry to manage the community forest. The government considers all land state land and the government has the right to issue certificates (for ownership) or licenses to third parties to manage a certain area. Land use history Until 1970s only community land use, mainly for subsistence and some extraction of valuable products demanded by the market. In 1970 timber concessions were allocated by the national government. The timber companies exploited a limited number of commercial timber species. Communities were still able to partly use their village territory. In 1990s oil palm plantations were developed in Central Kalimantan. Initially government would allocate area to oil palm plantation, often with limited (or no) scheme for smallholders. In general this created problems because communities lost large tracks of their community land. With political reforms, and increased protest by communities the government changed the regulation for oil palm plantation requiring oil palm plantations to allocate 20% of the area to smallholder schemes. Buntoi has no established oil palm plantations in its village territory, but has had oil palm concession allocated to its village territory.
    [Show full text]
  • South-East Asia Second Edition CHARLES S
    Geological Evolution of South-East Asia Second Edition CHARLES S. HUTCHISON Geological Society of Malaysia 2007 Geological Evolution of South-east Asia Second edition CHARLES S. HUTCHISON Professor emeritus, Department of geology University of Malaya Geological Society of Malaysia 2007 Geological Society of Malaysia Department of Geology University of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Geological Society of Malaysia ©Charles S. Hutchison 1989 First published by Oxford University Press 1989 This edition published with the permission of Oxford University Press 1996 ISBN 978-983-99102-5-4 Printed in Malaysia by Art Printing Works Sdn. Bhd. This book is dedicated to the former professors at the University of Malaya. It is my privilege to have collabo­ rated with Professors C. S. Pichamuthu, T. H. F. Klompe, N. S. Haile, K. F. G. Hosking and P. H. Stauffer. Their teaching and publications laid the foundations for our present understanding of the geology of this complex region. I also salute D. ]. Gobbett for having the foresight to establish the Geological Society of Malaysia and Professor Robert Hall for his ongoing fascination with this region. Preface to this edition The original edition of this book was published by known throughout the region of South-east Asia. Oxford University Press in 1989 as number 13 of the Unfortunately the stock has become depleted in 2007. Oxford monographs on geology and geophysics.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 the Land Capability Classification of Sabah Volume 2 the Sandakan Residency
    25 The land capability classification of Sabah Volume 2 The Sandakan Residency Q&ffls) (Kteg®QflK§@© EAï98©8CöXjCb Ö^!ÖfiCfDÖ©ÖGr^7 CsX? (§XÄH7©©©© Cß>SFMCS0®E«XÄJD(SCn3ß Scanned from original by ISRIC - World Soil Information, as i(_su /Vorld Data Centre for Soils. The purpose is to make a safe jepository for endangered documents and to make the accrued nformation available for consultation, following Fair Use Guidelines. Every effort is taken to respect Copyright of the naterials within the archives where the identification of the Copyright holder is clear and, where feasible, to contact the >riginators. For questions please contact soil.isricOwur.nl ndicating the item reference number concerned. The land capability classification of Sabah Volume 2 The Sandakan Residency 1M 5>5 Land Resources Division The land capability classification of Sabah Volume 2 The Sandakan Residency P Thomas, F K C Lo and A J Hepburn Land Resource Study 25 Land Resources Division, Ministry of Overseas Development Tolworth Tower, Surbiton, Surrey, England KT6 7DY 1976 in THE LAND RESOURCES DIVISION The Land Resources Division of the Ministry of Overseas Development assists developing countries in mapping, investigating and assessing land resources, and makes recommendations on the use of these resources for the development of agriculture, livestock husbandry and forestry; it also gives advice on related subjects to overseas governments and organisations, makes scientific personnel available for appointment abroad and provides lectures and training courses in the basic techniques of resource appraisal. The Division works in close co-operation with government departments, research institutes, universities and international organisations concerned with land resource assessment and development planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Permitting Crime
    PERMITTING CRIME: How palm oil expansion drives illegal logging in Indonesia ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS This document has been produced with the financial assistance of UKaid, the European Union and the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD). 3 INTRODUCTION 4 TIMBER SUPPLY IN INDONESIA This report was written and edited by the 7 PLANTATION PERMITTING PROCEDURES Environmental Investigation Agency UK Ltd, and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the positions of Ukaid, the European 8 RATES OF ILLEGALITY Union, or NORAD. 10 CASE STUDIES Designed by: www.designsolutions.me.uk Printed on recycled paper 18 CORRUPTION ON THE FOREST FRONTIER December 2014 21 LAW ENFORCEMENT All images © EIA unless otherwise stated 22 ZERO DEFORESTATION TO THE RESCUE? 23 STEMMING THE ILLEGAL TIMBER FLOW 24 CLOSING THE FOREST CONVERSION LOOPHOLE 26 RECOMMENDATIONS 27 REFERENCES ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY (EIA) 62/63 Upper Street, London N1 0NY, UK Tel: +44 (0) 20 7354 7960 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7354 7961 email: [email protected] GLOSSARY OF TERMS: www.eia-international.org AMDAL: Environmental Impact Assessment EIA US IPK: Timber Utilization Permit P.O.Box 53343 Washington DC 20009 USA IUP: Plantation Business Permit Tel: +1 202 483 6621 Fax: +202 986 8626 JPIK: Independent Forestry Monitoring Network email: [email protected] Regency: Kabupaten, an administrative unit beneath the Province Regent: Bupati, the head of a regency or kabupaten SK-PKH: Decree of Forest Estate Release FRONT COVER: Forest cleared for oil palm in SVLK: Timber Legality Verification System Lamandau, Kalteng, September 2013. BACK COVER: Forest in Gunung Mas, Kalteng, October 2014 INTRODUCTION In June 2013, the Government of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, announced the latest in a long line of attempts to rein in hundreds of oil palm plantation companies operating in violation of the law.
    [Show full text]
  • Porosity of Sediment Mixtures with Different Grain Size Distribution
    Effect of Cohesive Material on Bank Erosion Process in Sesayap River, East Kalimantan Province, Indonesia Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University 〇 Puji Harsanto Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University Masaharu Fujita Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University Hiroshi Takebayashi 1. INTRODUCTION Riverbank erosion is a natural process that can cause the loss of useful land and endangers the safety of navigation, among others. Riverbank erosion becomes a problem or disaster, if it occurs in rivers around residential area, constructions, or others useful land. Bank erosion processes are essentially dominated by the complicated interaction between flow, sediment transport, and bank material (Duan, 2001). Horizontal shift speed of bank is changed rapidly when the bank is composed of both the non-cohesive material layers and the cohesive material layers such as the bank erosions that occurred in Sesayap River, East Kalimantan, Fig. 1. Sesayap River at Malinau Indonesia (Takebayashi, 2010). Fig. 1 shows Sesayap River that passes at Malinau city. The phenomenon of bank erosion and sedimentation around the Sesayap River especially at Malinau city are: 1. Bank erosion at Seluwing area (Fig. 2) endangers the land transportation facilities in the town of Malinau and sandbars grows in the middle of the river, 2. Bank erosion at speedboat dock area (location 2). The Sesayap River is 279 km long and the catchment has an area of about 18158 km2. Sesayap River is a navigation channel which conducts between Malinau and Tarakan. At Seluwing area (location 1) riverbank was collapsed on April and September 2008. Those collapses gave damages on the road structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Borneo Biomedical Bibliography
    144 Index of ethnic and language groups Not all the groups living in Borneo are represented in this index because many have not been studied as to their health status or health problems. In addition, some cited reports do not specific the group or groups studied, or they use a name that is obsolete or incorrect. In cases where a group is identified as “Dayak,” the designation is of little value, except that Dayak is commonly taken to refer to any non-Muslim group in Borneo. Dayak, then, is neither an ethnic nor a linguistic identifier. For a geographical representation of Borneo groups, see the Borneo map in S. A. Wurm and S. Hattori, Land Atlas of the Pacific Area, Part 2, Japan Area, Taiwan (Formosa), Philippines, Mainland and Insular Southeast Asia, Australian Academy of the Humanities, Canberra, 1983. For Kalimantan in particular see the maps in B. Sellato (#647 in the bibliography). For a general classification of Borneo languages see M. Ruhlen, A Guide to the World’s Languages, Volume 1: Classification, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1991. Details on the complexity of languages and language designations in Borneo, as well as language maps, are given in The Ethnologue, SIL International, Dallas, Texas, 1996-. It is available on-line at http://www.ethnologue.com. Linguistic relationships among Borneo groups are reviewed in A. Adelaar, The Austronesian languages of Southeast Asia and Madagascar: a historical perspective, in The Austronesian Languages of Southeast Asia and Madagascar, A. Adelaar and N. P. Himmelmann, eds., Routledge, London, 2005, pp. 1-41. Austronesian is a large language family that includes all the languages in Borneo.
    [Show full text]
  • PERMUKIMAN TEPIAN SUNGAI KAHAYAN KOTA PALANGKARAYA Urban Riverside Settlement Model Case : Kahayan Riverside Settlement, Palangkaraya
    Jurnal Permukiman Vol. 9 No. 1 April 2014 : 17-27 MODEL PERMUKIMAN KAWASAN TEPIAN SUNGAI KASUS : PERMUKIMAN TEPIAN SUNGAI KAHAYAN KOTA PALANGKARAYA Urban Riverside Settlement Model Case : Kahayan Riverside Settlement, Palangkaraya 1Noor Hamidah, 2R. Rijanta, 3Bakti Setiawan, 4Muh. Aris Marfai 1Pengajar Jurusan Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Palangkaraya dan Mahasiswa S3 Fakultas Geografi dan Pengajar Jurusan Geografi, Fakultas Geografi, Universitas Gadjah Mada 2,4Pengajar Jurusan Geografi, Fakultas Geografi, Universitas Gadjah Mada 3Pengajar Jurusan Arsitektur dan Perencanaan, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Gadjah Mada 1E-mail : [email protected] 2E-mail : [email protected] 3E-mail : [email protected] 4E-mail : [email protected] Diterima : 20 Juli 2012; Disetujui : 12 Maret 2014 Abstrak Sejarah Kota Palangkaraya berawal dari permukiman Kampung Pahandut di kawasan tepian Sungai Kahayan. Peran Sungai Kahayan sebagai orientasi, tempat tinggal/ awal bermukim dan mengembangkan kehidupan manusia/ bekerja bagi masyarakat Dayak. Kini masalah yang terjadi ialah perubahan kawasan tepian Sungai Kahayan berkembang menjadi kota yang dinamis, permukiman tumbuh secara organik dan pola jalan berorientasi ke darat membelakangi sungai, sehingga fungsi sungai berubah dari fungsi awalnya. Sungai sebagai falsafah hidup dan orientasi masyarakat Dayak Ngaju. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah mengidentifikasi model permukiman di kawasan tepian sungai, kasus kawasan permukiman tepian Sungai Kahayan, Kota Palangkaraya. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan
    [Show full text]