Regional Connector Existing Conditions Report

JULY 2016

METRO DOWNTOWN & REGIONAL CONNECTOR

EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Prepared by the Los Angeles Department of Planning

Los Angeles City Hall - 6th Floor 200 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 (213) 978 -1170 www.planning.lacity.org

Community Planning and Transit Neighborhood Planning Staff Patricia Diefenderfer, Senior City Planner Bryan Eck, City Planner Tal Harari, Planning Assistant Clare Kelley, Planning Assistant

Geographic Information Systems Staff Charles Lee, GIS Supervisor II Scott Jackson, GIS Specialist

This project was funded by Metro’s Round 3 TOD Planning Grant Program

INTRODUCTION : BACKGROUND 1

INTRODUCTION : METHODOLOGY 2-3

AERIAL : ALL STATIONS 4

DEMOGRAPHICS : ALL STATIONS 5 The complete Existing Conditions Report contains additional information including: ECONOMIC PROFILE : ALL STATIONS 6 • aerial maps • building footprints LAND USE PATTERNS : ALL STATIONS 7 • demographics • economic profile TRANSIT PATTERNS : ALL STATIONS 8 • general plan land use • zoning HOUSING : ALL STATIONS 9 • existing land use • transit service • traffic patterns APPENDIX : ALL STATIONS 10 • street designations • housing • opportunity sites • historic resources • public service & amenities • planning overlays

To view the complete report, please visit www.dtla2040.org.

Image Source: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro)

EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT | DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES | LADCP TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING | JULY 2016 EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT | DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES | LADCP TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING | JULY 2016 ii INTRODUCTION | background In 2012, The City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning (LADCP), in partnership with Metro, launched The 1.9 mile Regional Connector alignment will allow passengers to seamlessly transfer an effort to create several Transit Neighborhood Plans to develop livable community and employment between the Gold, Blue, Expo, Red and Purple heavy raill subway lines, and bypass Downtown centers around the region’s expanding transit network. The plan focuses on neighborhoods surrounding Los Angeles Union Station, by constructing three new Metro stations and connecting travel a total of 25 future and existing transit stations Citywide. corridors through the center of Downtown.

To prepare for development trends that accompany these transit stations, Metro has provided a grant The alignment crosses several distinct communities within Downtown, including the historic to the LADCP to create regulatory tools to guide future land use around the rail stations. This report Little Tokyo community, the concentration of federal, state and local government offices in details the existing conditions of three future and four existing stations within Downtown, and focused the Civic Center, the cultural entertainment center in Bunker Hill, the dense commercial core on the Regional Connector Transit Project. It is designed to be a resource for Metro, the LADCP staff, and in the Financial District, as well as the residential and retail uses in the Historic Core. community stakeholders.

Image Source: Cory Gruenfeld EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT | DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES | LADCP TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING | JULY 2016 1 INTRODUCTION | methodology

Metro Station Future Regional Connector Metro Red/Purple Lines Metro Gold Line Metro Blue Line Metro Expo Line 1/2 Mile Radius Community Plan Area Boundaries 2nd PLACE/ HOPE ST. CIVIC CENTER WESTLAKE STATION COMMUNITY PLAN AREA STATION

2nd ST./ 7th/METRO BROADWAY CENTER STATION STATION CENTRAL CITY NORTH COMMUNITY PLAN AREA

1st STREET/ PERSHING CENTRAL AVE. SQUARE STATION STATION

CENTRAL CITY PICO/CHICK COMMUNITY PLAN AREA HEARN STATION

SOUTH LA COMMUNITY PLAN AREA

SOUTHEAST LA COMMUNITY PLAN AREA

This existing conditions report includes information on current land uses, housing, demographics, Due to the proximity of the stations and irregularity of the census tracts, some tracts are in multiple station areas and thus economic conditions, and livability patterns. were included in the analysis of each station. The study areas around the three new, and four existing stations were established by choosing a group The demographic data in this report comes from the United States Census Bureau and the maps come from the of census tracts to represent each station area. The basic radius of a half-mile is used to represent a Department of City Planning Systems & GIS Division unless otherwise noted. For more information on the data analysis typical threshold of willingness to walk to a transit stop. Census tracts were chosen if they, in part or in and sources, please see the detailed methodology in the Appendix. whole, were located within this half-mile radius from the intersection nearest to the station entrance.

FUTURE STATIONS census tracts

2nd PLACE/HOPE STREET 2nd STREET/BROADWAY AVE. 1st STREET/CENTRAL AVE. 2073.01 2062 2060.2 2073/02 2071.02 2060.31 2075.01 2073.01 2062 2075.02 2073.02 2063 2077.1 2074 2071.02 2080 2075.02 2073.01 2092 2080 2073.02 2092 2074

EXISTING STATIONS census tracts

CIVIC CENTER STATION 7th STREET/METRO CENTER PERSHING SQUARE PICO/CHICK HEARN 2062 2073.01 2063 2077.1 2071.02 2073.02 2073.01 2079 2071.02 2075.02 2073.02 2100.1 2073.01 2077.1 2074 2240.1 2073.02 2079 2075.02 2240.2 2074 2092 2077.1 2242 2075.01 2093 2075.02

EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT | DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES | LADCP TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING | JULY 2016 3 Metro Station Future Regional Connector AERIAL | all stations Metro Red/Purple Lines Metro Blue Line Metro Expo Line Metro Gols Line 1/4 Mile Radius 1/2 Mile Radius

2nd PLACE/HOPE 2nd STREET/BROADWAY 1st STREET/CENTRAL CIVIC CENTER 7th STREET/METRO PERSHING SQUARE PICO/CHICK HEARN

Image Source: Sterling Davis Image Source: Metro Image Source: Tal Harari Image Source: Kent Kanouse Image Source: Flickr Image Source:: Flickr Image Source: Frederick Dennstedt

Image Source: Metro Image Source: Flickr Image Source: Prayitno Image Source: Flickr Image Source: Flickr Image Source: Steve Lyon Image Source:: South Park Business Improvement DIstrict

2nd PLACE/HOPE 2nd STREET/BROADWAY 1st STREET/CENTRAL CIVIC CENTER 7th STREET/METRO PERSHING SQUARE PICO/CHICK HEARN

TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL POPULATION 15,242 9,895 6,230 10,323 12,548 12,788 9,620

54% 46% 57% 43% 63% 37% 57% 43% 65% 54% 58% 42% 53% 47%

TOP 3 AGE GROUPS TOP 3 AGE GROUPS TOP 3 AGE GROUPS TOP 3 AGE GROUPS TOP 3 AGE GROUPS TOP 3 AGE GROUPS TOP 3 AGE GROUPS

25-29 yrs 24% 25-29 yrs 14% 25-29 yrs 11% 25-29 yrs 13% 25-29 yrs 18% 25-29 yrs 22% 30-34 yrs 10% 30-34 yrs 18% 35-39 yrs 11% 30-34 yrs 11% 30-34 yrs 10% 30-34 yrs 17% 35-39 yrs 18% 20-24 yrs 9% 35-39 yrs 17% 30-34 yrs 10% 35-39 yrs 11% 35-39 yrs 10% 35-39 yrs 14% 30-34 yrs 17% 25-29 yrs 8%

EDUCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT ATTAINMENT ATTAINMENT ATTAINMENT ATTAINMENT ATTAINMENT ATTAINMENT

Graduate Some College, 9% Degree, 19% Some College, 16% Some College, Bachelor's Degree, 19% Some College, 15% Some Bachelor's 17% Associate's Associate's College, Degree, 21% Bachelor's Degree, Degree, 4% Degree, 4% Associate's Bachelor's 18% 24% Bachelor's Bachelor's < 9th Grade, 9% Degree, 4% Degree, 22% Some College, 19% Associate's Degree, 20% Degree, 23% Bachelor's Degree, 5% HS Graduate, Degree, 30% Associate's 14% < High School HS Graduate, 16% Degree, 5% Graduate, 8% HS Graduate, Associate's Degree, 3% Graduate Degree, 15% Graduate 17% Graduate Degree, 14% Graduate HS Graduate, Degree, 12% Degree, 17% Graduate Degree, 18% Graduate Degree, HS < High School 12% HS Graduate, < High School 9% Graduate, … HS Graduate, 14% Graduate, 14% 14% Graduate, 12% < High School Graduate, < 9th Grade, < 9th Grade, 11% Associate's 17% < High School < 9th Grade, < 9th Grade, 7% Some College, < 9th Grade, 20% < High School 8% Degree, 5% 11% 15% Graduate, 12% Graduate, 11% < High School < 9th Grade, 20% Graduate, 9%

2nd PLACE/HOPE 2nd STREET/BROADWAY 1st STREET/CENTRAL CIVIC CENTER 7th STREET/METRO PERSHING SQUARE PICO/CHICK HEARN

7,993 4,348 1,980 4,199 6,136 6,776 1,980 EMPLOYED EMPLOYED EMPLOYED EMPLOYED EMPLOYED EMPLOYED EMPLOYED WORKERS WORKERS WORKERS WORKERS WORKERS WORKERS WORKERS 198,022 JOBS 169,628 60,179 158,082 101,383 87,255 60,179 JOBS JOBS JOBS JOBS JOBS JOBS

AVG COMMUTE TIME AVG COMMUTE TIME AVG COMMUTE TIME AVG COMMUTE TIME AVG COMMUTE TIME AVG COMMUTE TIME AVG COMMUTE TIME 27 minutes 27 minutes 28 minutes 27 minutes 26 minutes 27 minutes 28 minutes

JOB DENSITY JOB DENSITY JOB DENSITY JOB DENSITY JOB DENSITY JOB DENSITY JOB DENSITY 396 Jobs/Acre 339 Jobs/Acre 120 Jobs/Acre 316 Jobs/Acre 203 Jobs/Acre 175 Jobs/Acre 120 Jobs/Acre

JOB INTENSITY JOB INTENSITY JOB INTENSITY JOB INTENSITY JOB INTENSITY JOB INTENSITY JOB INTENSITY 24.77 39 30.4 37 16 12.88 30.4 Jobs/Employed Worker Jobs/Employed Worker Jobs/Employed Worker Jobs/Employed Worker Jobs/Employed Worker Jobs/Employed Worker Jobs/Employed Worker

JOBS/HOUSING JOBS/HOUSING JOBS/HOUSING JOBS/HOUSING JOBS/HOUSING JOBS/HOUSING JOBS/HOUSING BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE 18.82 Jobs/Housing Unit 27 Jobs/Housing Unit 16.57 Jobs/Housing Unit 23.98 Jobs/Housing Unit 11.84 Jobs/Housing Unit 8.3 Jobs/Housing Unit 16.57 Jobs/Housing Unit

TOP 3 COMMUTE MODES TOP 3 COMMUTE MODES TOP 3 COMMUTE MODES TOP 3 COMMUTE MODES TOP 3 COMMUTE MODES TOP 3 COMMUTE MODES TOP 3 COMMUTE MODES

Auto-Drive Alone 52% Auto-Drive Alone 48% Auto-Drive Alone 47% Auto-Drive Alone 51% Auto-Drive Alone 52% Auto-Drive Alone 48% Auto-Drive Alone 49% Public Transit 15% Public Transit 20% Public Transit 19% Walk 16% Walk 18% Walked 21% Public Transit 23% Walk 16% Walk 14% Walk 12% Public Transit 14% Public Transit 13% Public Transit 13% Carpool 11%

TOP 3 INDUSTRIES TOP 3 INDUSTRIES TOP 3 INDUSTRIES TOP 3 INDUSTRIES TOP 3 INDUSTRIES TOP 3 INDUSTRIES TOP 3 INDUSTRIES Educational Services, 15% Arts, Entertainment, 16% Professional, Scientific, 16% Educational Services, Health 14% Professional, Scientific, 12% Professional, Scientific, 16% Educational Services, Health 14% Health Care & Social Recreation, Accommodation & Management, Administrative Care & Social Assistance Management, Administrative Management, Administrative Care & Social Assistance Assistance Food Services & Waste Management & Waste Management & Waste Management Arts, Entertainment, 11% Educational Services, Health Recreation, Accommodation 13% Educational Services, Health Educational Services, Health Manufacturing Professional, Scientific, Educational Services, Health 13% Care & Social Assistance 13% 11% Care & Social Assistance 13% 13% Management, Care & Social Assistance & Food Services Care & Social Assistance Administrative & Waste Arts, Entertainment, Professional, Scientific, Finance, Insurance, Arts, Entertainment, Professional, Scientific, Management 10% Recreation, Accommodation 10% Management, Administrative 10% Real Estate, Rental & 10% Recreation, Accommodation 10% Retail Trade 12% Management, Administrative & Food Services & Waste Management Leasing & Food Services Information 9% & Waste Management

EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT | DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES | LADCP TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING | JULY 2016 6 LAND USE PATTERNS | all stations

2nd PLACE/HOPE 2nd STREET/BROADWAY 1st STREET/CENTRAL CIVIC CENTER 7th STREET/METRO PERSHING SQUARE PICO/CHICK HEARN

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE Percentage of Land Area Percentage of Land Area Percentage of Land Area Percentage of Land Area Percentage of Land Area Percentage of Land Area Percentage of Land Area Freeways, 4% High Medium, 2% Light Manufacturing, 2% High, 18% Regional Commercial, 2% Regional Center Community Public Facilities, 40% Community Commercial, 2% Commercial, 45% Commercial, 8% Open Space, 1% High Medium, 1% Open Space, 1% High Medium, 2% Mixed Use Commercial - Community Commercial, Residential, 1% Regional Public Facilities, 14% Commercial, 5% Light Regional Center 2% Public Facilities, 24% Commercial, 53% Open Space, 5% Public Facilities, Manufacturing Regional Center , 4% Other Public 11% Commercial, 20% Open Space, Community Commercial, Freeways, 1% Freeways, 6% 8% Freeways, 6% 1% Commercial Manufacturing, 6% Open Space, 5% Regional Center High Regional Center High Commercial, 70% High Medium, 4% Medium, 2% Commercial, 74% Regional Commercial, 1% Medium, Freeways, Light Other Public Regional Commercial, 2% High, 1% 3% Manufacturing, OS, 2% Community Regional 5% OS, 5% 1% Commercial, 4% Community OS, 2% Commercial, 6% High, 12% Public Facilities, 27% Commercial, 10% Commercial Public Facilities, 34% Other Public Manufacturing, Regional Center Commercial, 20% OS, 2% Heavy 4% Manufacturing, Freeways, 8% Public Facilities, 33% 19% Light Manufacturing, 11% Regional Center Community Commercial, 37% Commercial, 1% ZONING ZONING ZONING ZONING ZONING ZONING ZONING

CW, 0.7% OS, 0.6% OS, 5% M3, 19% C5, 13% M2, PF, 45.59% M2, 1% LASED, CW, 18% CM, 3.4% 4.7% C5, 13% C4, 16% 7.2% M2, 0.96% OS, 5.15% PF, 35.56% OS, 2%

PF, 32% C5, 2.77% LASED, 2% CW, 16% M2, 11% PF, 13.7% OS, 2% R3, 0.6% C4, 7% CM, 4% OS, 4.70% PF, 12% R4, 0.4% CEC, 17.6% PF, 7% C5, 1% C4, 14.93% ADP, 3% PF, 27% R4, 1.82% R4, 0% C4, 7% R5, 18.5% C4, 16% C4, 14.97% C4, 0.2% R5, 11.50% R5, 9.80% R5, 13% R5, 13% R5, 9%

VARIOUS, 3% OS, 2% C2, 37% C2, 44% R5, 3% VARIOUS, C2, 29.1% C2, 28.98% C2, 23% C2, 22.41% 0.45% VARIOUS, 3.1% C2, 20% VARIOUS, 2%

EXISTING LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE Vacant, 6% Vacant, Vacant, 5.7% Vacant, 8% Vacant, 9% 3% Commercial, Industrial, 0.7% Vacant, 4% Public Facilities, 9% Industrial, 1% Unknown, 23% 10% Commercial, 7% Unknown, 25% Unknown, 39% Institutional, 3% Commercial, Institutional, 3.6% Unknown, 45% Commercial, 15% 5.8% Commercial, 14% Unknown, 25% Unknown, 34% Mixed-Use, 1% Commercial, Mixed-Use, 2.3% 11% Industrial, 1% Unknown, 23.4% Parking, 18% Institutional, 1% Mixed-Use, 1% Multi Family Residential, 8% Industrial, 13% Industrial, Multi-Family Industrial, 2% 2% Residential, 12.2% Multi Family Institutional, 2% Residential, 7% Multi Family Institutional, 4% Institutional, 4% Mixed-Use, 3% Residential, 7%

Parking, 15% Mixed-Use, 3% Mixed- Mixed-Use, 1% Use, 2% Multi Family Multi Family Residential, 7% Institutional, 3% Public Facilities, 30% Residential, 6% Multi Family Parking, 13.1% Residential, 8% Parking, 20% Industrial, 10% Vacant, 6% Parking, 11% Public Facilities, 25% Public Facilities, 22% Parking, 13% Parking, 19%

Public Facilities, 9% Commercial, 22% Public Facilities, 33.2% Public Facilities, 2%

EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT | DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES | LADCP TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING | JULY 2016 7 TRANSIT PATTERNS | all stations

2nd PLACE/HOPE 2nd STREET/BROADWAY 1st STREET/CENTRAL CIVIC CENTER 7th STREET/METRO PERSHING SQUARE PICO/CHICK HEARN 2nd PLACE/HOPE 2nd STREET/BROADWAY 1st STREET/CENTRAL CIVIC CENTER 7th STREET/METRO PERSHING SQUARE PICO/CHICK HEARN

STATION AREA AVERAGE BUS STATION AREA AVERAGE BUS STATION AREA AVERAGE BUS STATION AREA AVERAGE BUS STATION AREA AVERAGE BUS STATION AREA AVERAGE BUS STATION AREA AVERAGE BUS BOARDINGS/ALIGHTINGS BOARDINGS/ALIGHTINGS BOARDINGS/ALIGHTINGS BOARDINGS/ALIGHTINGS BOARDINGS/ALIGHTINGS BOARDINGS/ALIGHTINGS BOARDINGS/ALIGHTINGS 11,953 20,790 1,431 13,354 34,251 47,354 7,575 W 13,591 W 21,775 W 1,407 W 14,033 W 34,886 W 47,968 W 7,389

STATION WALKSCORE* STATION WALKSCORE* STATION WALKSCORE* STATION WALKSCORE* STATION WALKSCORE* STATION WALKSCORE* STATION WALKSCORE* 96 95 96 98 96 92 89 Walker’s Paradise Walker’s Paradise Walker’s Paradise Walker’s Paradise Walker’s Paradise Walker’s Paradise Walker’s Paradise

*Based on results from walkscore.com *Based on results from walkscore.com *Based on results from walkscore.com *Based on results from walkscore.com *Based on results from walkscore.com *Based on results from walkscore.com *Based on results from walkscore.com

VEHICLES PER VEHICLES PER VEHICLES PER VEHICLES PER VEHICLES PER VEHICLES PER VEHICLES PER HOUSEHOLD HOUSEHOLD HOUSEHOLD HOUSEHOLD HOUSEHOLD HOUSEHOLD HOUSEHOLD NUMBER AVAILABLE TO OCCUPIED UNITS NUMBER AVAILABLE TO OCCUPIED UNITS NUMBER AVAILABLE TO OCCUPIED UNITS NUMBER AVAILABLE TO OCCUPIED UNITS NUMBER AVAILABLE TO OCCUPIED UNITS NUMBER AVAILABLE TO OCCUPIED UNITS NUMBER AVAILABLE TO OCCUPIED UNITS

1 Car 52% 1 Car 53% 1 Car 48% 1 Car 53% 1 Car 48% 1 Car 54% 1 Car 46%

2 Cars 27% 2 Cars 27% 2 Cars 36% 2 Cars 27% 2 Cars 36% 2 Cars 26% 2 Cars 33%

0 Cars 16% 0 Cars 16% 0 Cars 8% 0 Cars 16% 0 Cars 9% 0 Cars 17% 0 Cars 17%

3 Cars 5% 3 Cars 4% 3 Cars 6% 3 Cars 4% 3 Cars 6% 3 Cars 3% 3 Cars 3%

EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT | DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES | LADCP TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING | JULY 2016 EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT | DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES | LADCP TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING | JULY 2016 8 TOTAL UNITS HOUSING | all stations OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS RENTER-OCCUPIED UNITS VACANT UNITS 2nd PLACE/HOPE 2nd STREET/BROADWAY 1st STREET/CENTRAL CIVIC CENTER 7th STREET/METRO PERSHING SQUARE PICO/CHICK HEARN

NUMBER OF UNITS NUMBER OF UNITS NUMBER OF UNITS NUMBER OF UNITS NUMBER OF UNITS NUMBER OF UNITS NUMBER OF UNITS

10,521 6,257 3,632 6,593 8,563 10,510 5,679 893 10% 336 6% 480 15% 537 10% 878 12% 884 10% 442 12% 8,104 90% 5,003 94% 2,636 85% 5,129 90% 6,282 88% 8,119 90% 3,304 88% 1,524 14% 918 15% 517 14% 927 14% 1,210 14% 1,506 14% 671 12%

MEDIAN HOME VALUE MEDIAN HOME VALUE MEDIAN HOME VALUE MEDIAN HOME VALUE MEDIAN HOME VALUE MEDIAN HOME VALUE MEDIAN HOME VALUE OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS $386,800 $347,740 $377,775 $347,740 $426,720 $422,733 $371,580

MEDIAN GROSS RENT MEDIAN GROSS RENT MEDIAN GROSS RENT MEDIAN GROSS RENT MEDIAN GROSS RENT MEDIAN GROSS RENT MEDIAN GROSS RENT RENTER-OCCUPIED UNITS RENTER-OCCUPIED UNITS RENTER-OCCUPIED UNITS RENTER-OCCUPIED UNITS RENTER-OCCUPIED UNITS RENTER-OCCUPIED UNITS RENTER-OCCUPIED UNITS $1,226 $899 $1,064 $1,013 $1,222 $1,020 $1,060 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME INCOME INCOME INCOME INCOME INCOME INCOME $37,828 $23,643 $18,531 $24,805 $36,022 $26,012 $35,677

AVG HOUSEHOLD SIZE AVG HOUSEHOLD SIZE AVG HOUSEHOLD SIZE AVG HOUSEHOLD SIZE AVG HOUSEHOLD SIZE AVG HOUSEHOLD SIZE AVG HOUSEHOLD SIZE

1.63 1.75 1.57 1.64 1.78 1.29 2.46

AFFORDABLE HOUSING AFFORDABLE HOUSING AFFORDABLE HOUSING AFFORDABLE HOUSING AFFORDABLE HOUSING AFFORDABLE HOUSING AFFORDABLE HOUSING HUD SUBSIDIZED UNITS HUD SUBSIDIZED UNITS HUD SUBSIDIZED UNITS HUD SUBSIDIZED UNITS HUD SUBSIDIZED UNITS HUD SUBSIDIZED UNITS HUD SUBSIDIZED UNITS

1,152 1,390 1,913 1,614 1,152 3,934 1,185

Certain census tracts had a recorded median gross rent and median home value EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT | DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES | LADCP TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING | JULY 2016 as “$2,000+” and “$1,000,000+” respectively. For the purpose of this analysis, those values were rounded to $2,000 and $1,000,000. 9 APPENDIX | detailed methodology

2nd PLACE/HOPE 2nd STREET/BROADWAY 1st STREET/CENTRAL CIVIC CENTER 7th STREET/METRO PERSHING SQUARE PICO/CHICK HEARN

Selected Tracts: All 2010 US Census Tracts within (fully or partially) the ½ mile radii surrounding the Metro station intersections. Median Earnings: American Community Survey 2009-2013 by selected tracts, “Industry by Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Judgment was used to assign census tract to their respective station areas. (In 2013 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) for the Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over” (B24031). The Median Earnings for the top three industries in each station area were averaged across the selected tracts. Population by Age & Sex / Total Population: American Community Survey 2009-2013 by selected tracts, “Age & Sex” (B0101) Traffic Patterns: Map data © 2016 Google Maps “Typical Traffic” Educational Attainment: American Community Survey 2009-2013 by selected tracts, “Educational Attainment” (S1501) Station Walkshed / Walk Score: Map reflects results from www.walkshed.com. Analysis site was centered at the station intersection. Language Spoken at Home: American Community Survey 2009-2013 by selected tracts, “Language Spoken At Home” (S1601) Bike Infrastructure: Map reflects data from “City of Los Angeles Bikeways” Interactive Map (LADOT) http://www.bicyclela.org/ maps_main.htm Race & Ethnicity: American Community Survey 2009-2013 by selected tracts, “Hispanic/Latino Or Latino Origin By Race” (B03002); All respondents identifying as “Hispanic/Latino” are grouped accordingly; Respondents identifying as “Non- Transit Service: Map reflects data from Metro and LADOT service maps; Boarding/alighting data from Metro. Hispanic/Latino” are grouped into their respective identities. Median Household Income: American Community Survey 2009-2013 by selected tracts, “Median Income in the Past 12 Months (In Employed Workers / Average Commute Time: American Community Survey 2009-2013 by selected tracts, “Selected 2013 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars)” (S1903). Economics Characteristics” (DP03), Employed Workers represents Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over; Average Commute Time is an average of the census tract averages. Average Household Size: American Community Survey 2009-2013 by selected tracts, “Average Household Size of Occupied Housing Units by Tenure” (B25010). Jobs: US Census Bureau - Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) “OnTheMap“Application; Data was selected by “work,” where workers are employed to capture the number of jobs that are within selected census tracts. Affordable Housing: Number of units reflects data from the City’s AB987 Affordable Housing Database and HUD’s LIHTC and Section 8 Contract Databases. Addresses were geocoded and units aggregated by selected by census tract. Job Density / Job Intensity: Density was determined by dividing Total Jobs by area (acres) of selected tracts, which was calculated on ArcGIS by LADCP GIS Division; Intensity was determined by dividing Total Jobs by Employed Workers. All Other Housing Data: American Community Survey 2009-2013 by selected tracts, “Selected Housing Characteristics” (DP04). Jobs / Housing Balance: Total Jobs divided by Total Housing Units. Historic Resources: Map reflects data from HistoricPlacesLA.org Commuting Modes: American Community Survey 2009-2013 by selected tracts, “Means of Transportation to Work by Public Services & Amenities: Map reflects data from the Bureau of Engineering’s NavigateLA web application and © 2016 Google Industry” (B08126); Figure represents Workers 16 Years and Over. Maps. Top Industries: 2010 US Census by selected tracts, “Selected Economics Characteristics” (DP03); Percentage reflects the total Maps: All maps created by LADCP staff unless otherwise noted. workers in each industry group compared to total workers in the census tract.