PARTS of the TRIDENTINE MASS INTRODUCTORY RITES Priest And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

PARTS of the TRIDENTINE MASS INTRODUCTORY RITES Priest And

PARTS OF THE TRIDENTINE MASS INTRODUCTORY RITES PRAYERS AT THE FOOT OF THE ALTAR Priest and ministers pray that God forgive his, and the people=s sins. KYRIE All ask the Lord to have mercy. GLORIA All praise the Glory of God. COLLECT Priest=s prayer about the theme of Today=s Mass. MASS OF CATECHUMENS EPISTLE New Testament reading by one of the Ministers. GRADUAL All praise God=s Word. GOSPEL Priest reads from one of the 4 Gospels SERMON The Priest now tells the people, in their language, what the Church wants them to understand from today=s readings, or explains a particular Church teaching/rule. CREED All profess their faith in the Trinity, the Catholic Church, baptism and resurrection of the dead. LITURGY OF THE EUCHARIST THE OFFERTORY The bread and wine are brought to the Altar and prepared for consecration. THE RITE OF CONSECRATION The Preface Today=s solemn intro to the Canon, followed by the Sanctus. The Canon The fixed prayers/actions for the consecration of the bread/wine. Before the Consecration The Church, gathered around the pope and in union with the saints, presents the offerings to God and prays that they are accepted to become the Body/Blood of Christ. The Consecration ΑThis is not a prayer: it is the recital of what took place at the Last Supper: the priest does again what the Lord did, speaks the Lord=s own words.≅ After the Consecration The Church offers Christ=s own sacrifice anew to God, to bring the Church together in peace, save those in Purgatory and Αus sinners≅ , so that Christ may give honor to the Father. THE COMMUNION The Lord=s Prayer Agnus Dei The ΑBread≅ is broken. Communion Necessary that only the Priest receive, and only he from the Chalice. Dismissal ΑIte [Go], missa est.≅ But no one goes anywhere yet! Blessing Last Gospel Priest reads 1st chp of John. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

(1) Western Culture Has Roots in Ancient and ___
5 16. (50) If a 14th-century composer wrote a mass. what would be the names of the movement? TQ: Why? Chapter 3 Kyrie, Gloria, Credo, Sanctus, Agnus Dei. The text remains Roman Liturgy and Chant the same for each day throughout the year. 1. (47) Define church calendar. 17. (51) What is the collective title of the eight church Cycle of events, saints for the entire year services different than the Mass? Offices [Hours or Canonical Hours or Divine Offices] 2. TQ: What is the beginning of the church year? Advent (four Sundays before Christmas) 18. Name them in order and their approximate time. (See [Lent begins on Ash Wednesday, 46 days before Easter] Figure 3.3) Matins, before sunrise; Lauds, sunrise; Prime, 6 am; Terce, 9 3. Most important in the Roman church is the ______. am; Sext, noon; Nones, 3 pm; Vespers, sunset; Mass Compline, after Vespers 4. TQ: What does Roman church mean? 19. TQ: What do you suppose the function of an antiphon is? Catholic Church To frame the psalm 5. How often is it performed? 20. What is the proper term for a biblical reading? What is a Daily responsory? Lesson; musical response to a Biblical reading 6. (48) Music in Context. When would a Gloria be omitted? Advent, Lent, [Requiem] 21. What is a canticle? Poetic passage from Bible other than the Psalms 7. Latin is the language of the Church. The Kyrie is _____. Greek 22. How long does it take to cycle through the 150 Psalms in the Offices? 8. When would a Tract be performed? Less than a week Lent 23.
[Show full text]
Introitus: the Entrance Chant of the Mass in the Roman Rite
Introitus: The Entrance Chant of the mass in the Roman Rite The Introit (introitus in Latin) is the proper chant which begins the Roman rite Mass. There is a unique introit with its own proper text for each Sunday and feast day of the Roman liturgy. The introit is essentially an antiphon or refrain sung by a choir, with psalm verses sung by one or more cantors or by the entire choir. Like all Gregorian chant, the introit is in Latin, sung in unison, and with texts from the Bible, predominantly from the Psalter. The introits are found in the chant book with all the Mass propers, the Graduale Romanum, which was published in 1974 for the liturgy as reformed by the Second Vatican Council. (Nearly all the introit chants are in the same place as before the reform.) Some other chant genres (e.g. the gradual) are formulaic, but the introits are not. Rather, each introit antiphon is a very unique composition with its own character. Tradition has claimed that Pope St. Gregory the Great (d.604) ordered and arranged all the chant propers, and Gregorian chant takes its very name from the great pope. But it seems likely that the proper antiphons including the introit were selected and set a bit later in the seventh century under one of Gregory’s successors. They were sung for papal liturgies by the pope’s choir, which consisted of deacons and choirboys. The melodies then spread from Rome northward throughout Europe by musical missionaries who knew all the melodies for the entire church year by heart.
[Show full text]
A Comparison of the Two Forms of the Roman Rite
A Comparison of the Two Forms of the Roman Rite Mass Structures Orientation Language The purpose of this presentation is to prepare you for what will very likely be your first Traditional Latin Mass (TLM). This is officially named “The Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite.” We will try to do that by comparing it to what you already know - the Novus Ordo Missae (NOM). This is officially named “The Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite.” In “Mass Structures” we will look at differences in form. While the TLM really has only one structure, the NOM has many options. As we shall see, it has so many in fact, that it is virtually impossible for the person in the pew to determine whether the priest actually performs one of the many variations according to the rubrics (rules) for celebrating the NOM. Then, we will briefly examine the two most obvious differences in the performance of the Mass - the orientation of the priest (and people) and the language used. The orientation of the priest in the TLM is towards the altar. In this position, he is facing the same direction as the people, liturgical “east” and, in a traditional church, they are both looking at the tabernacle and/or crucifix in the center of the altar. The language of the TLM is, of course, Latin. It has been Latin since before the year 400. The NOM was written in Latin but is usually performed in the language of the immediate location - the vernacular. [email protected] 1 Mass Structure: Novus Ordo Missae Eucharistic Prayer Baptism I: A,B,C,D Renewal Eucharistic Prayer II: A,B,C,D Liturgy of Greeting: Penitential Concluding Dismissal: the Word: A,B,C Rite: A,B,C Eucharistic Prayer Rite: A,B,C A,B,C Year 1,2,3 III: A,B,C,D Eucharistic Prayer IV: A,B,C,D 3 x 4 x 3 x 16 x 3 x 3 = 5184 variations (not counting omissions) Or ~ 100 Years of Sundays This is the Mass that most of you attend.
[Show full text]
The Attractiveness of the Tridentine Mass by Alfons Cardinal Stickler
The Attractiveness of the Tridentine Mass by Alfons Cardinal Stickler Cardinal Alfons Stickler, retired prefect of the Vatican Archives and Library, is normally reticent. Not so during his trip to the New York area in May [1995]. Speaking at a conference co-sponsored by Fr. John Perricon's ChistiFideles and Howard Walsh's Keep the Faith, the Cardinal scored Catholics within the fold who have undermined the Church—and in the final third of his speech made clear his view that the "Mass of the post-Conciliar liturgical commission" was a betrayal of the Council fathers. The robust 84-year-old Austrian scholar, a Salesian who served as peritus to four Vatican II commissions (including Liturgy), will celebrate his 60th anniversary as a priest in 1997. Among his many achievements: The Case for Clerical Celibacy (Ignatius Press), which documents that the celibate priesthood was mandated from the earliest days of the Church. Cardinal Stickler lives at the Vatican. The Tridentine Mass means the rite of the Mass which was fixed by Pope Pius V at the request of the Council of Trent and promulgated on December 5, 1570. This Missal contains the old Roman rite, from which various additions and alterations were removed. When it was promulgated, other rites were retained that had existed for at least 200 years. Therefore, is more correct to call this Missal the liturgy of Pope Pius V. Faith and Liturgy From the very beginning of the Church, faith and liturgy have been intimately connected. A clear proof of this can be found in the Council of Trent itself.
[Show full text]
Implementing Summorum Pontificum in the Diocese of Davenport
DIOCESE OF DAVENPORT Policies for Implementing Summorum Pontificum in the Diocese of Davenport These pages may be reproduced by parish and Diocesan staff for their use Policy promulgated at the Pastoral Center of the Diocese of Davenport–effective September 14, 2007 Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross Revised November 27, 2011 Revised October 15, 2012 Most Reverend Martin Amos Bishop of Davenport TABLE OF CONTENTS §IV-249 POLICIES FOR IMPLEMENTING SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM IN THE DIOCESE OF DAVENPORT: INTRODUCTION 1 §IV-249.1 THE ROLE OF THE BISHOP 2 §IV-249.2 FACULTIES 3 §IV-249.3 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CELEBRATION OF MASS 4 §IV-249.4 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CELEBRATION OF THE OTHER SACRAMENTS AND RITES 6 §IV-249.5 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 6 APPENDICES Appendix A: Documentation Form 7 Appendix B: Resources 8 0 §IV-249 Policies for Implementing Summorum Pontificum in the Diocese of Davenport §IV-249 POLICIES IMPLEMENTING SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM IN THE DIOCESE OF DAVENPORT Introduction In the 1980s, Pope John Paul II established a way to allow priests with special permission to celebrate Mass and the other sacraments using the rites that were in use before Vatican II (the 1962 Missal, also called the Missal of John XXIII or the Tridentine Mass). Effective September 14, 2007, Pope Benedict XVI loosened the restrictions on the use of the 1962 Missal, such that the special permission of the bishop is no longer required. This action was taken because, as universal shepherd, His Holiness has a heart for the unity of the Church, and sees the option of allowing a more generous use of the Mass of 1962 as a way to foster that unity and heal any breaches that may have occurred after Vatican II.
[Show full text]
Immaculate Conception Catholic Church SEPTEMBER 13, 2020
SEPTEMBER 13, 2020 TWENTY-THIRD SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME Immaculate Conception Catholic Church MASS SCHEDULE Saturday: 4:30 pm Sunday: 8:30 am & 11:00 am Monday-Thursday: 7:30 am Friday: 7:30 am & 7:00 pm (Tridentine Mass) Holy Day Vigil: 7:00 pm (excluding All Saints) Holy Day: 7:30 am, 12:00 pm & 7:00 pm National Holidays: 9:00 am SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM Call to schedule a Baptism or for required Pre-Baptism Class dates and registration. CONFESSIONS Thursday before First Friday, after 7:30 am Mass First Friday: 5:30-6:30 pm Saturdays: 3:00 pm-4:00 pm in the church “Cry Room” BLESSED SACRAMENT CHAPEL HOURS Monday-Saturday: 9:00 am-2:00 pm Limited to three people at a time. Sunday: Closed PARISH REGISTRATION New parishioners please call the Parish to register. Please contact the parish o>ce to update a change of address, phone number, email address or any other status change SACRAMENT OF MATRIMONY Please contact Parish Priest for marriage information at least six months before proposed marriage date. PASTORAL STAFF Paul J. Mrozek – Maintenance Supervisor Rev. Michael J. Troha MA, M.Div. - Pastor Daniel A. Norman – Maintenance Staff Rev. Dennis M. McNeil - Parochial Vicar Betsy A. Prelee – Accountant Deacon John V. Nelson, Sr.- Deacon Sister Josephine Rasoamampionona, O.SS.T. – Parish Kathleen M. Doles - Administrative Assistant Catechetical Leader Eileen R. Fleisher - Administrative Assistant Colleen M. Royer – Office Manager Deborah A. George - Administrative Assistant Sandra L. Smith – SMT Coordinator Donald J. Glasier - Maintenance Staff Constance M. Theobald – Administrative Assistant Michael F.
[Show full text]
Responsibility Timelines & Vernacular Liturgy
The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theology Papers and Journal Articles School of Theology 2007 Classified timelines of ernacularv liturgy: Responsibility timelines & vernacular liturgy Russell Hardiman University of Notre Dame Australia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_article Part of the Religion Commons This article was originally published as: Hardiman, R. (2007). Classified timelines of vernacular liturgy: Responsibility timelines & vernacular liturgy. Pastoral Liturgy, 38 (1). This article is posted on ResearchOnline@ND at https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_article/9. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Classified Timelines of Vernacular Liturgy: Responsibility Timelines & Vernacular Liturgy Russell Hardiman Subject area: 220402 Comparative Religious Studies Keywords: Vernacular Liturgy; Pastoral vision of the Second Vatican Council; Roman Policy of a single translation for each language; International Committee of English in the Liturgy (ICEL); Translations of Latin Texts Abstract These timelines focus attention on the use of the vernacular in the Roman Rite, especially developed in the Renewal and Reform of the Second Vatican Council. The extensive timelines have been broken into ten stages, drawing attention to a number of periods and reasons in the history of those eras for the unique experience of vernacular liturgy and the issues connected with it in the Western Catholic Church of our time. The role and function of International Committee of English in the Liturgy (ICEL) over its forty year existence still has a major impact on the way we worship in English. This article deals with the restructuring of ICEL which had been the centre of much controversy in recent years and now operates under different protocols.
[Show full text]
Assisting at the Parish Eucharist
The Parish of Handsworth: The Church of St Mary: Assisting at the Parish Eucharist 1st Lesson Sunday 6th June Celebrant: The Rector Gen 3:8-15 N Gogna Entrance Hymn: Let us build a house (all are welcome) Reader: 2nd Lesson 2 Cor 4: 1st After Trinity Liturgical Deacon: A Treasure D Arnold Gradual Hymn: Jesus, where’er thy people meet Reader: 13-5:1 Preacher: The Rector Intercessor: S Taylor Offertory Hymn: There’s a wideness in God’s mercy Colour: Green MC (Server): G Walters Offertory Procession: N/A Communion Hymn: Amazing grace Thurifer: N/A N/A Final Hymn: He who would valiant be Mass Setting: Acolytes: N/A Chalice: N/A St Thomas (Thorne) Sidespersons: 8.00am D Burns 11.00am R & C Paton-Devine Live-Stream: A Lubin & C Perry 1st Lesson Ezek 17: Sunday 13th June Celebrant: The Rector M Bradley Entrance Hymn: The Church’s one foundation Reader: 22-end 2nd Lesson 2nd After Trinity Liturgical Deacon: P Stephen 2 Cor 5:6-17 A Cash Gradual Hymn: Sweet is the work my God and king Reader: Preacher: P Stephen Intercessor: R Cooper Offertory Hymn: God is working his purpose out Colour: Green MC (Server): G Walters Offertory Procession: N/A Communion Hymn: The king of love my shepherd is Thurifer: N/A N/A Final Hymn: The Kingdom of God is justice… Mass Setting: Acolytes: N/A Chalice: N/A St Thomas (Thorne) Sidespersons: 8.00am E Simkin 11.00am L Colwill & R Hollins Live-Stream: W & N Senteza Churchwarden: Keith Hemmings & Doreen Hemmings Rector: Fr Bob Stephen Organist: James Jarvis The Parish of Handsworth: The Church of St Mary: Assisting at
[Show full text]
The Bugnini-Liturgy and the Reform of the Reform the Bugnini-Liturgy and the Reform of the Reform
in cooperation with the Church Music Association of America MusicaSacra.com MVSICAE • SACRAE • MELETEMATA edited on behalf of the Church Music Association of America by Catholic Church Music Associates Volume 5 THE BUGNINI-LITURGY AND THE REFORM OF THE REFORM THE BUGNINI-LITURGY AND THE REFORM OF THE REFORM by LASZLO DOBSZAY Front Royal VA 2003 EMINENTISSIMO VIRO PATRI VENERABILI ET MAGISTRO JOSEPHO S. R. E. CARDINALI RATZINGER HOC OPUSCULUM MAXIMAE AESTIMATIONIS AC REVERENTIAE SIGNUM D.D. AUCTOR Copyright © 2003 by Dobszay Laszlo Printed in Hungary All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Conventions. No part of these texts or translations may be reproduced in any form without written permission of the publisher, except for brief passages included in a review appearing in a magazine or newspaper. The author kindly requests that persons or periodicals publishing a review on his book send a copy or the bibliographical data to the following address: Laszlo Dobszay, 11-1014 Budapest, Tancsics M. u. 7. Hungary. K-mail: [email protected] Contents INTRODUCTION Page 9 1. HYMNS OF THE HOURS Page 14 2. THE HOLY WEEK Page 20 3. THE DIVINE OFFICE Page 45 4. THE CHANTS OF THE PROPRIUM MISSAE VERSUS "ALIUS CANTUS APTUS" Page 85 5. THE READINGS OF THE MASS AND THE CALENDAR Page 121 6. THE TRIDENTINE MOVEMENT AND THE REFORM OF THE REFORM Page 147 7. HIGH CHURCH - LOW CHURCH: THE SPLIT OF CATHOLIC CHURCH MUSIC Page 180 8. CHURCH MUSIC AT THE CROSSROADS Page 194 A WORD TO THE READER Page 216 Introduction The growing displeasure with the "new liturgy" introduced after (and not by) the Second Vatican Council is characterized by two ideas.
[Show full text]
Traditional Latin Mass (TLM), Otherwise Known As the Extraordinary Form, Can Seem Confusing, Uncomfortable, and Even Off-Putting to Some
For many who have grown up in the years following the liturgical changes that followed the Second Vatican Council, the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM), otherwise known as the Extraordinary Form, can seem confusing, uncomfortable, and even off-putting to some. What I hope to do in a series of short columns in the bulletin is to explain the mass, step by step, so that if nothing else, our knowledge of the other half of the Roman Rite of which we are all a part, will increase. Also, it must be stated clearly that I, in no way, place the Extraordinary Form above the Ordinary or vice versa. Both forms of the Roman Rite are valid, beautiful celebrations of the liturgy and as such deserve the support and understanding of all who practice the Roman Rite of the Catholic Church. Before I begin with the actual parts of the mass, there are a few overarching details to cover. The reason the priest faces the same direction as the people when offering the mass is because he is offering the sacrifice on behalf of the congregation. He, as the shepherd, standing in persona Christi (in the person of Christ) leads the congregation towards God and towards heaven. Also, it’s important to note that a vast majority of what is said by the priest is directed towards God, not towards us. When the priest does address us, he turns around to face us. Another thing to point out is that the responses are always done by the server. If there is no server, the priest will say the responses himself.
[Show full text]
Modern Alternative Popes*
Modern Alternative Popes* Magnus Lundberg Uppsala University The Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) is arguably the most important event in modern Catholicism, and a major act on the twentieth-century religious scene at large. On several points, the conciliar fathers made changes in how the Catholic Church perceived the modern world. The language in the decrees was different from earlier councils’, and the bishops opened up for ecumenism and interreligious dialogue, seeing at least “seeds of truth” in other religious traditions. The conciliar fathers also voted in favour of liberty of religion, as meaning something more than the right to practise Catholic faith. A very concrete effect of the Council was the introduction of the New Mass Order (Novus Ordo Missae) in 1969 that replaced the traditional Roman rite, decreed by Pius V in 1570. Apart from changes in content, under normal circumstances, the new mass should be read in the vernacular, not in Latin as before. Though many Catholics welcomed the reforms of Vatican II, many did not. In the period just after the end of the Council, large numbers of priests and nuns were laicized, few new priest candidates entered the seminaries, and many laypeople did not recognize the church and the liturgy, which they had grown up with. In the post- conciliar era, there developed several traditionalist groups that criticized the reforms and in particular the introduction of the Novus Ordo. Their criticism could be more or less radical, and more or less activist. Many stayed in their parishes and attended mass there, but remained faithful to traditional forms of devotions and paid much attention to modern Marian apparitions.
[Show full text]
Tridentine Community News May 23, 2010
Tridentine Community News May 23, 2010 Beyond the New English Ordinary Form Missal: 6. It is not pastorally appropriate to suggest that the judgment of Other Issues With Approved Translations – Part 3 the Canadian and American bishops in approving the NRSV and NAB translations may have been flawed. Our bishops did so In Part 2 of this column series, we compared English translations recognizing that these particular translations were the work of of the Holy Bible. We provided an example of the same passage Catholic, Protestant, Eastern Orthodox, and Jewish scholarly of Holy Scripture as translated in the Douay-Rheims Bible (used translating teams whose focus was accuracy. They are direct in most translations of the Extraordinary Form of Holy Mass), the responses to Pope Pius XII’s encyclical and eminently suitable. New American Bible (used in the Ordinary Form in the United States), and the New Revised Standard Version (used in the A Clarification of Our Own Thoughts Ordinary Form in Canada). Our argument was that the Douay’s use of hierarchical language when addressing God, along with We cannot be cafeteria Catholics. We cannot accuse liberal other reverent constructs of English, are particularly fitting Catholics of picking and choosing what they like, if we of a more expressions of the content of the Bible, consistent with traditional bent are guilty of the same. Our column was not meant commonly-found English translations of the Ordinary and to suggest that we approached the topic from a perspective of Orations of the Tridentine Mass. Biblical expertise. Quite the contrary: this author is relatively unfamiliar with the Holy Bible, and is not qualified to debate, for We are always open to corrections and differing views.
[Show full text]