Naval Medical Operations at Kingston During the War of 1812

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Naval Medical Operations at Kingston During the War of 1812 Canadian Military History Volume 18 Issue 1 Article 5 2009 Naval Medical Operations at Kingston during the War of 1812 Gareth A. Newfield Canadian War Museum, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Newfield, Gareth A. "Naval Medical Operations at Kingston during the War of 1812." Canadian Military History 18, 1 (2009) This Canadian War Museum is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Newfield: Naval Medical Operations Naval Medical Operations at Kingston during the War of 1812 Gareth Newfield ritish naval medicine in Kingston, Furthermore, operations in Europe Frederick, immediately across the BOntario is a peripheral and against Napoleonic France dominated Cataraqui River commencing shortly seldom-explored aspect of the War the medical resources of the British afterwards. Little effort, however, of 1812 on the Great Lakes. Men Army and Royal Navy for much of was made to provide the Marine hospitalized ashore disappeared the war against the United States. Department with its own medical from history, and consequently our Medical officers at the Kingston infrastructure. As a division of the understanding of the circumstances and Point Frederick shore hospitals British Army rather than the Royal and conditions under which they faced shortages of facilities, staff Navy, its seamen were expected received medical care is quite poor. and supplies throughout the War of to rely upon the military hospital The practice of naval medicine 1812. Many of these issues were not (erected by the Loyalists in 1783) in in Upper Canada was beset with fully rectified until the conclusion Kingston. Throughout the 1790s, plans adversity. Makeshift arrangements of hostilities and mortality rates to erect a dedicated naval hospital instituted before the war created amongst patients were often high. Yet naval medical infrastructure in the grim realities of naval medical care Résumé : Durant la guerre de 1812, Kingston which was far from in Kingston were the consequence of la pratique de la médecine navale à robust, and was often unequal to adverse circumstances, not inadequate Kingston (alors quartier général des forces navales britanniques dans le secteur des the demands of an active conflict. treatment by naval surgeons. Grands Lacs) fut semée d’embûches. Abstract: Throughout the War of 1812 the This article explores naval Sous la dépendance de l’armée pendant practice of naval medicine in Kingston (the medicine in Kingston during the War de nombreuses années, les ressources headquarters of British naval forces on of 1812 in terms of the development médicales de la marine provinciale étaient the Great Lakes) was beset with adversity. of hospital infrastructure, personnel, infimes en plus d’être aux prises avec des problèmes de plus en plus nombreux Dependent for years upon the army, the logistics, quality of care, and Provincial Marine’s medical resources à mesure que s’accroissaient les forces were minimal, with problems increasing effectiveness. Drawing heavily upon de la Royal Navy dans le secteur. Les exponentially after the expansion of the primary sources, it seeks to shed chirurgiens de la marine eurent à faire face Royal Navy’s forces on the lakes in early new light on naval medical activities à une pénurie constante de personnel, de 1813. Naval surgeons in Kingston faced ashore in order to foster a greater fournitures, d’installations et de services. almost constant shortages of personnel, Ils travaillaient dans des situations understanding of the conditions under supplies and facilities, issues which were pénibles, qui ne s’améliorèrent qu’à la not fully resolved until the very end of the which medical officers laboured to toute fin de la guerre. Et, bien que la war. Yet although the standard of care provide effective treatment to British qualité des soins dispensés dans ces under these conditions has earned a poor and Canadian naval forces on the conditions ait eu mauvaise réputation, reputation in the past, naval medical Great Lakes.1 les officiers de santé de la marine avaient officers in fact strove to ensure the fait leur possible pour assurer le confort comfort and recovery of their patients. et le rétablissement de leurs patients. Cet This article follows the development of The Question of Space article est consacré au développement de naval medical infrastructure in Kingston l’infrastructure de la médecine navale à during the conflict, demonstrating that ingston was selected as the Kingston pendant le conflit et montre que, despite adverse circumstances the care headquarters of the nascent malgré les circonstances défavorables, K les soins qui y étaient prodigués étaient provided was often both sophisticated Provincial Marine in 1789, with and effective. souvent à la fois élaborés et efficaces. construction of a dockyard at Point © Canadian Military History, Volume 18, Number 1, Winter 2009, pp.37-47. 37 Published by Scholars Commons @ Laurier, 2009 1 Canadian Military History, Vol. 18 [2009], Iss. 1, Art. 5 were rejected several times owing to a During the fall of 1805 the naval the Marine Department sought lack of resources, as well as objections hospital was temporarily abandoned additional medical facilities closer to from local inhabitants over the and its patients moved into barracks the dockyard but its limited resources potential communication of disease in the town owing to problems with restricted options. As a temporary to the town, and the indiscipline of the building’s upkeep.7 By 1809 measure, the hulk of the HMS Duke the Marine Department’s personnel.2 these makeshift arrangements had of Kent (the Marine Department’s Nonetheless, by 1799 separate military so aggravated the local inhabitants, oldest and most decrepit vessel) was and naval hospitals existed within who generally opposed the presence employed as a hospital.9 Resting in Kingston.3 The latter was presumably of military hospitals within the the mud at the dockyard and moored the structure on the west bank of town, that they lobbied Governor- to shore, this impromptu facility was the Cataraqui River identified on an General Sir James Craig for the far from a ideal, although it remained 1816 map of Kingston (by Lieutenant removal of the garrison hospital in use well into 1813.10 Over the (RN) A.T.E. Vidal) as the “Old Naval because the Provincial Marine had course of the severe winter of 1812- Hospital.”4 Details of its construction used it almost exclusively for years. 1813, these ad hoc arrangements are unknown, although an inventory Indeed, they argued there was “a became increasingly unsatisfactory indicates it possessed wards for much more convenient and healthy as sick rates among naval personnel officers and enlisted seamen, a place for an Hospital for Seamen” increased. The Provincial Marine’s receiving room for new patients, as at Point Frederick, “contiguous to main hospital was geographically well as accommodations for the staff, their Vessels and Barracks.”8 Craig, isolated from the dockyard, and supply rooms and a morgue.5 however, rejected the petition, and both it and the decaying Duke of Throughout the first decade of both hospitals remained in use by Kent required constant repair. The the 19th century this modest facility naval personnel. hospital had become so dilapidated was frequently unable to provide At the commencement of by 1814 that the entire roof had to be adequate accommodations for the hostilities with the United States in “speedily” replaced in order to ensure Provincial Marine’s patients. In May June 1812, Kingston became a key the comfort of its patients.11 Clearly 1805 another storey was added to strategic garrison, supply and transit the naval medical establishment the town’s military hospital in order point for the British Army in Upper required better quarters. to provide additional space for Canada. It was also the primary In May 1813, Commodore Sir seamen, as the Marine Department headquarters and depot for British James Yeo of the Royal Navy arrived outnumbered Kingston’s small naval forces on the Great Lakes, at Kingston to assume operational peacetime garrison at the time.6 although smaller establishments control on the Great Lakes from existed at York and Niagara. the Provincial Marine following its As a result of the war the lacklustre performance against the strength of the Kingston’s Americans in 1812. He immediately garrison, and thus its ordered a complete reorganization medical needs increased of naval infrastructure, including and the Provincial Marine medical arrangements. Captain was forced to relinquish Richard O’Conor, given command use of the military hospital of the dockyard, accordingly sought to the army. As a result, to concentrate naval medical facilities at Point Frederick. Plans for “a Naval Hospital on Point Frederick, to contain Detail of “Plan of Kingston One Hundred Men” were solicited and It’s [sic] Vicinity (etc.)” by United Kingdom Hydrographic Office, B 718 B Office, Hydrographic Kingdom United in the Kingston Gazette on 8 June Lieutenant (Royal Navy) A.T.E. 12 Vidal, 1816, showing the location 1813. Until 2007, historians assumed of the pre-war naval hospital on this stone building survived as the the bank of the Cataraqui River residence of the commandant of the at the upper left. Following the Royal Military College of Canada.13 relocation of infrastructure to In fact, the new hospital proposed by Point Frederick in 1815 this building was utilised as a spare O’Conor was a substantial two-storey storehouse, as indicated on the wooden-framed structure, and was map. located immediately northwest of the modern residence.14 This building 38 https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh/vol18/iss1/5 2 Newfield: Naval Medical Operations appears in a number of mid-19th Commodore Sir James Lucas Yeo, century artworks, including Henry commander of British naval forces on Francis Ainslie’s 1839 watercolour of the Great Lakes between 1813 and Fort Henry.
Recommended publications
  • Canadian Military Journal, Issue 13, No 2
    Vol. 13, No. 2 , Spring 2013 CONTENTS 3 EDITOR’S CORNER 4 VALOUR 6 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR INTERDEPARTMENTAL CIVILIAN/MILITARY COOPERATION 8 CANADA’S WHOLE OF GovernMENT MISSION IN AFghanistan - LESSONS LEARNED by Kimberley Unterganschnigg Cover TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION A two-seater CF-188 Hornet flies over the Parc des Laurentides en 17 ACTIVE Protection SYSTEMS: route to the Valcartier firing A Potential JacKpot to FUTURE ARMY Operations range, 22 November 2012. by Michael MacNeill Credit : DND Photo BN2012-0408-02 by Corporal Pierre Habib SCIENCE AND THE MILITARY 26 AN Overview OF COMPLEXITY SCIENCE AND its Potential FOR MilitarY Applications by Stéphane Blouin MILITARY HISTORY 37 THE Naval Service OF CANADA AND OCEAN SCIENCE by Mark Tunnicliffe 46 Measuring THE Success OF CANADA’S WARS: THE HUNDRED DAYS OFFENSIVE AS A CASE STUDY by Ryan Goldsworthy CANADA’S WHOLE OF 57 “FIGHT OR FarM”: CANADIAN FarMERS AND GOVERNMENT MISSION THE DILEMMA OF THE WAR EFFort IN WORLD WAR I (1914-1918) IN AFGHANIstan - by Mourad Djebabla LESSONS LEARNED VIEWS AND OPINIONS 68 CANADA’S FUTURE FIGHTER: A TRAINING CONCEPT OF Operations by Dave Wheeler 74 REDEFINING THE ARMY Reserves FOR THE 21ST CENTURY by Dan Doran 78 NCM Education: Education FOR THE FUTURE Now by Ralph Mercer COMMENTARY ACTIVE PROTECTION 82 What ARE THE Forces to DO? SYSTEMS: A POTENTIAL by Martin Shadwick JACKPOT TO FUTURE ARMY OPERatIONS 86 BOOK REVIEWS Canadian Military Journal / Revue militaire canadienne is the official professional journal of the Canadian Forces and the Department of National Defence. It is published quarterly under authority of the Minister of National Defence.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Booth Packing Company
    MARINE SUBJECT FILE GREAT LAKES MARINE COLLECTION Milwaukee Public Library/Wisconsin Marine Historical Society page 1 Current as of January 7, 2019 A. Booth Packing Company -- see Booth Fleets Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987 (includes Antiquities Act of 1906) Abitibi Fleet -- see Abitibi Power and Paper Company Abitibi Power and Paper Company Acme Steamship Company Admiralty Law African Americans Aids to Navigation (Buoys) Aircraft, Sunken Alger Underwater Preserve -- see Underwater parks and preserves Algoma Central Railway Marine Algoma Steamship Co. -- see Algoma Central Railway (Marine Division) Algoma Steel Corporation Allan Line (Royal Mail Steamers) Allen & McClelland (shipbuilders) Allen Boat Shop American Barge Line American Merchant Marine Library Assn. American Shipbuilding Co. American Steamship Company American Steel Barge Company American Transport Lines American Transportation Company -- see Great Lakes Steamship Company, 1911-1957 Anchor Line Anchors Andrews & Sons (Shipbuilders) Andrie Inc. Ann Arbor (Railroad & Carferry Co.) Ann Arbor Railway System -- see Michigan Interstate Railway Company Antique Boat Museum Antiquities Act of 1906 see Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987 Apostle Islands -- see Islands -- Great Lakes Aquamarine Armada Lines Arnold Transit Company Arrivals & Departures Association for Great Lakes Maritime History Association of Lake Lines (ALL) Babcock & Wilcox Baltic Shipping Co. George Barber (Shipbuilder) Barges Barry Transportation Company Barry Tug Line -- see Barry Transportation Company Bassett Steamship Company MARINE SUBJECT FILE GREAT LAKES MARINE COLLECTION Milwaukee Public Library/Wisconsin Marine Historical Society page 2 Bay City Boats Inc. Bay Line -- see Tree Line Navigation Company Bay Shipbuilding Corp. Bayfield Maritime Museum Beaupre, Dennis & Peter (Shipbuilders) Beaver Island Boat Company Beaver Steamship Company -- see Oakes Fleets Becker Fleet Becker, Frank, Towing Company Bedore’s, Joe, Hotel Ben Line Bessemer Steamship Co.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naval War of 1812, Volume 1, Index
    The Naval War of 1812: A Documentary History Volume I 1812 Part 7 of 7 Naval Historical Center Department of the Navy Washington, 1985 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2011 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. NOTE ON THE INDEX Index Certain aspects of the treatment of persons and vessels in this index supple­ ment annotation in the volume. Abbott, - -(Capt.). 255, 256 (Rebecca) 649·51; mentioned, 24. 25, 214. 216n, 497 , PERSONS; The Tank of military personnel is the highest rank attained by the in­ A~rdour , James (Comdr., RN). 182 (Muros) 646,651. 5ee also Croker. John W. dividual between the declaration of war, 18 June 1812, and 31 December Acasta , HM frigate: capcuta: Curlew. 216. Admiralty Courts. British: Essu case, I, 16-2 1 1812. When all references to an individual lie outside that span, the rank is 225; at La Cuaira, 64; on Nonh Amuican High Court of Admiralty: ruling in Essu the highest applicable to the person at the times to which the text refers. Station. 495; of( Nantucket. 505: chases case, 16, 17.20·21: mentioned, 25. 66. 67 Civilian masters of vessels are identified simply as "Capt." Vessels that Essu, mentioned. 485, 487 , 497 (Alexander - Lorch Commissionen of Appeals. 20·21 R. Kerr) civilians and naval personnel commanded during the period 18 June to ~H Vice Admiralty Courts: at Nassau. 17 -20: Actiw. American privat~r .schooner, 225 December 1812 are noted in parentheses at the end of the man's entry.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Was Retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act E-Register, Which Is Accessible Through the Website of the Ontario Heritage Trust At
    This document was retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act e-Register, which is accessible through the website of the Ontario Heritage Trust at www.heritagetrust.on.ca. Ce document est tiré du registre électronique. tenu aux fins de la Loi sur le patrimoine de l’Ontario, accessible à partir du site Web de la Fiducie du patrimoine ontarien sur www.heritagetrust.on.ca. -=- ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 271 SANDWICH STREET SOUTH, AMHERSTBURG, ONTARIO N9V 2A5 June 10, 1976 Ontario Heritage Foundation, 77 Grenville Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M7A 1E8 Att: Mr. Stephen Otto, Secretary. Dear Steve: Further to your requirements Steve, I enclose herewith certified copies of By-law #1404 and 1415, being By-laws to designate property located within the Town of Amherstburg as being of Historical and Architectural Value to the Heri­ tage of our Community. The properties so described in these By-laws have been registered in our local Registry Office. Hoping that this is satisfactory, and thanking you, I remain 'lgallin, Clerk-Administrator. M:nistry pf Culture and Recreotton TCK/sm RECEIVED Encls. JUN 111916 Jot , i OFFICE OF EXECU fl'.'£ Ol~ECTOR-. H~RITAGE CON$~RVATION i (. ( ,!,·• THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF AMHERSTBURG BY-LAW NO. 1404 A By-law to designate Property located within the Town of Amherstburg as being of Historical and Architectural Value to the Heritage of the Town of Amherstburg. Passed the 22nd day of December, 1975. WHEREAS certain lands and buildings located thereon, within the Town of Amherstburg and hereinafter described, are deemed to be of historical and architectural significance; AND WHEREAS in the opinion of the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Amherstburg, it is expedient and desirable to designate the said property to be of historical and architecturaL significance; THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF AMHERSTBURG ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges to Canada's Naval Reserve
    A FINE BALANCE: CHALLENGES TO CANADA’S NAVAL RESERVE Commander Marta B. Mulkins JCSP 37 PCEMI 37 Master of Defence Studies Maîtrise en études de la défense Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and do Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs et not represent Department of National Defence or ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Ministère de Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used la Défense nationale ou des Forces canadiennes. Ce without written permission. papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par le Minister of National Defence, 2011. ministre de la Défense nationale, 2011. 1 A Fine Balance: Challenges to Canada’s Naval Reserve A Thesis Submitted to the Division of Graduate Studies of the Royal Military College of Canada by Marta B. Mulkins, CD, Commander In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Defence Studies April 2010 ©This thesis may be used within the Department of National Defence but copyright for open publication remains the property of the author. 2 Table of Contents Abstract Chapter 1. Introduction 2. Background – History of the Naval Reserve in Canada Historic Foundations The Early Years of the Naval Reserve Lean Years Rise to the Challenge Post War Total Force Shift Coastal Defence Era for the Naval Reserve 3. The Current Situation Personnel Policy The Effect in the Naval Reserve Divisions The Effect on the Regular Force 4. Current Government of Canada Challenges Strategic Review Defence Force Structure Review MARCOM Force Structure Review 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipbuilding at Fort Amherstburg 1796-1813
    Ontario Shipbuilding at Fort Amherstburg 1796-1813 Parks Pares Canada Canada Cover: Detail from a watercolour by Reynolds. Shipbuilding The Navy Yard for the Upper Great Lakes at Fort Amherstburg 1796-1813. Located at Amherstburg, this view shows the Detroit under construction (Fort Maiden) July 1813. Detail from a watercolour by Reynolds. i796-1813 By the terms of Jay's Treaty of 1794 all territory in dispute in the area of the Great Lakes was to be given up by Great Britain as soon as possible. This was done by the end of August 1796. For the British it meant losing the defences and dockyards located at Detroit, Oswego, Niagara and Carleton Island. Defence and dockyard facilities at Detroit were trans­ ferred across the river to a new site subsequently known as Fort Amherstburg or Fort Maiden. In February 1799 the commandant at Amherst­ burg reported that carpenters had been at work for some time taking out all the old and decayed timbers found in the schooner Ottawa and replacing them with new ones. The vessel had been found to be in a state of decay and to require considerable re­ building which used up the greater part of the ma­ terials, especially timber, available at Amherstburg. Most of the timber used in the Amherstburg yard, especially pine and cedar, was obtained by contract with settlers and merchants. When finally ready to sail in the fall of the year, the extensive repairs and alterations made the Ottawa the equal of any new vessel and allowed her to carry one hundred more barrels than she formerly did.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Nadine Kopp. the Influence of the War of 1812 on Great
    ABSTRACT Nadine Kopp. The Influence of the War of 1812 on Great Lakes Shipbuilding. (Under the Direction of Dr. Bradley Rodgers) Department of History, January 2012. The purpose of this thesis is to determine whether the War of 1812 influenced ship construction techniques on the Great Lakes. During the War of 1812, much of the fighting in the North American theater of war primarily took place along the Niagara frontier and later along the St. Lawrence River. From the outset, both the Americans and British realized that gaining the upper hand in the conflict depended upon control of the Great Lakes. Critical to achieving the advantage was the development of a significant and powerful inland navy, which led to a shipbuilding race on both shores. The primary question raised surrounding Great Lakes ship construction in the early nineteenth century is whether or not this large scale event, the War of 1812, permanently influenced the way in which ships were constructed once the war was over. To answer this question, this study examines diagnostic attributes of archaeologically examined wrecks from the Great Lakes and Lake Champlain from before, during and after the War of 1812 to find similarities and difference in their design and construction The three time periods have been defined as the period before the War of 1812, from the French and Indian War (1754 to 1763), when British sailing ships first appeared on the Great Lakes, up to 1811; the period of the War of 1812 itself (1812-1814); and the period after the war leading up to the opening of the Welland Canal (1829) and the widespread use of steam engines on the Great Lakes (1830s-1840s).
    [Show full text]
  • The Capture of Detroit 1812 by R. Taylor
    The Capture of Detroit 1812 by R. Taylor On July 11th 1812, 2,500 American troops under General Hull reached the Detroit River and camped at Fort Detroit. At Amherstburg on the Canadian side of the river were 100 British regulars, 300 militia and 150 Indians led by Tecumseh. Hull crossed the Detroit and made his headquarters in a Canadian farm house. He issued a proclamation, which was printed for distribution among Canadians. It began: INHABITANTS OF CANADA After thirty years of peace and prosperity, the United States have been driven to arms. The injuries and aggressions, the insults and indignities of Great Britain have once more left no alternative but manly resistance or unconditional submission. The army under my command has invaded your country. The standard of the union now waves over the territory of Canada. To the peaceful and unoffending inhabitants it brings neither danger nor difficulty. I come to find enemies, not to make them; I come to protect not to injure you ... I have a force which will break down all opposition, and that force is but the vanguard of a much greater. If, contrary to your own interest, and the just expectations of my country, you should take part in the approaching contest, you will be considered and treated as enemies, and the horrors and calamities of war will stalk you ... General Hull was so preoccupied with his attempts to terrify Canadians with printed words that he neglected to protect American forts on Lake Michigan. As a result, a small force of British and Indians captured Fort Michilimackinac, while other Indians seized Fort Dearborn (Chicago).
    [Show full text]
  • How Lower Canada Won the War of 1812 Text of a Speech to The
    American Review of Canadian Studies Vol. 42, No. 3, September 2012, 321–328 How Lower Canada Won the War of 1812 Text of a speech to the Stanstead Historical Society at the Colby-Curtis Museum on April 14, 2012 by Desmond Morton, professor of history emeritus at McGill University in Montreal Between the summer of 1812 and the fall of 1814, Canada was engaged in a strange war with its young neighbor, the United States. Tradition has named the conflict the War of 1812 and a further tradition has extended a debate about the winner. Largely because the war ended with some American military successes, at Baltimore and New Orleans, Americans have claimed the war as a national triumph. So have Canadians. Had not the Americans set out to conquer Canada? Their invasion failed utterly. The border, although vague in several places, continued as before. Americans might well boast of pillaging Gananoque and burning the Upper Canadian legislature in York or even burning Newark, a town Canadians now call Niagara-on-the-Lake, leaving its population to freeze in the winter cold, but the invaders retreated and suffered predictable reprisals. The White House is white because the British left the original presidential residence coated in soot as retri- bution for what happened at York.1 American towns on the Niagara frontier soon shared the unhappy fate of Newark. Honors—or dishonors—were even. The war had real causes Students who read school textbooks may remember boring and confusing Anglo-American debates about the freedom of the seas, impressment of seamen, and even naval battles.
    [Show full text]
  • Pubuc Archives of Canada
    PUBUC ARCHIVES OF CANADA MANUSCRIPT DMSlON • • PRELIMINARY INVENTORY RECORD GROUP 8 BRITISH MlUTARY AND NAVAL RECORDS 1954 r PUBLIC ARCHIVES OF CANADA • MANUSCRIPT DIVISION PRELIMINARY INVENTORY RECORD GROUP 8 BRITISH MILITARY AND NAVAL RECORDS 1954 This preliminary inventory co"ers all the British milil.l.f"y and naval records transferred to the Public i'rchives up to January, 1954. The measurements given indicate the linC'M space occupied on the shelves. CONTENTS RECORD GROUP 8 BRITISH MILITARY AND NAVAL RECORDS PAGE IXTRODLJCTIO~ . 5 J. C. SERIES (BRITISH :\1IL1T.-\RY RECORDS) A. Correspondence of the :\Iilitary Secretary of the Commander of the Forces. 1767-1870 7 B. Records of the Canadian Command, 1785-1883... 12 C. Records of the ;\ova Scotia Command, 1762-1899. 14 D. :\Iiscellaneous Records, 1757-1896 _.... 18 E. :\Iissing and Transferred \·olumes................ 20 11. OROX.\NCE RECORDS . 21 Ill. AD:\IIR.-\LTY RECORDS A. .'\dmiralty Lake Service Records, 1814-1833. 23 B. Admiralty P3cific Station Records, 1858-1903.... 25 INDEX . 27 3 97308-2 INTRODUCTION From 1759 until 1871 the defence of Canada was primarily the responsibility of British military and IIJ,val forces. However. in ISil Britain decided to recall most of her troops st'ltioned in Canada and left only a garrison at Ilalifax for the protection of the naval station. A similar garrison was later sent to Esquimalt. Early in the twentieth century increasing tension in Europe led Britain to concentrate a larger proportion of the Royal Navy in home waters. As a result the garrisons at Halifax and Esquimalt were recalled.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ontario, 7–10 August 1813
    Canadian Military History Volume 11 Issue 3 Article 3 2002 The First Encounter: Fighting for Naval Supremacy on Lake Ontario, 7–10 August 1813 Robert James Williamson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Williamson, Robert James "The First Encounter: Fighting for Naval Supremacy on Lake Ontario, 7–10 August 1813." Canadian Military History 11, 3 (2002) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Williamson: The First Encounter The First Encounter Fighting for Naval Supremacy on Lake Ontario, 7-10 August 1813 Robert Janies Williamson Introduction command was at the New York Naval Yards and he knew all the right people in the right places. t the outbreak of the War of 1812, the United However, building a fleet takes time and as a AStates was woefully ill prepared to fight in stopgap measure Chauncey commandeered and the Great Lakes Basin. However, that is where armed seven merchant schooners. Not designed most of the warfare would take place. In that to carry heavy ordinance on their upper decks, relatively inaccessible part of the world where these schooners proved to be ungainly warships. few roads existed, both sides in this conflict knew that control of the water transportation To upgrade the fighting ability of the system was the key to military success. Despite Provincial Marine, the Royal Navy sent one of that, the Americans would start the war on Lake their best young commodores along with 465 Ontario with only one ship, a 16-gun, embargo- officers and ratings to operate the ships of the enforcement brig, named USS Oneida.
    [Show full text]
  • EMPIRE in the HOLD: the BRITISH MARITIME CULTURAL LANDSCAPE in the WESTERN GREAT LAKES 1759-1796 By
    EMPIRE IN THE HOLD: THE BRITISH MARITIME CULTURAL LANDSCAPE IN THE WESTERN GREAT LAKES 1759-1796 by Thomas Kurt Knoerl A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy History Committee: Director Department Chairperson Program Director Dean, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Date: Fall Semester 2012 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Empire in the Hold: The British Maritime Cultural Landscape in the Western Great Lakes 1759-1796 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University by Thomas Kurt Knoerl Master of Arts East Carolina University, 1994 Director: Randolph Scully, Professor Department of History Fall Semester 2012 George Mason University Fairfax, VA This work is licensed under a creative commons attribution-noderivs 3.0 unported license . ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my mother, Phyllis M. Knoerl, who gave me a love of history and always encouraged me to travel and see the places where history was made, both above and beneath the water. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In 1988 Dr. Stuart and Pat Scott invited me to participate in an underwater archaeological investigation of the cove area at Old Fort Niagara. It was my first exposure to underwater archaeology at an inundated colonial site. From the first I was hooked and I will be forever grateful to them for introducing me to an amazing world of material culture and the archaeologists and historians that work in this field. Researching and writing this dissertation led me to amazing places full of incredibly generous people to whom I owe much.
    [Show full text]