DOCSLIB.ORG

Analyses of Rocks and Minerals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analyses of Rocks and Minerals DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 419 ANALYSES OF ROCKS AND MINERALS FEOM THE LABORATORY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY \ 1880 TO 1908 TABULATED BY F. W. CLARKE, CHIEF CHEMIST WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1910 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 1 The average composition of rocks. ..'.....< .................................. 4 Analyses of igneous and crystalline rocks................................... 13 Maine. .................................................................... 13 1. Rocks from Aroostook County..... ^..................'........... 13 2. Miscellaneous rocks............................................. 14 New Hampshire....................................................... 15 Vermont............................................................... 15 1. Rocks of Mount Ascutney........................................ 15 2. Miscellaneous rocks.................:........................... 17 Massachusetts....:..............................................:..... .18 1. Magnesian rocks.............. ; .................................. 18 2. Amphibolite................................................... 19 3. Miscellaneous rocks............................................. 21 Connecticut............................................................ 24 New York............................................................. 26 1. Rocks of the Adirondack region................................... 26 2. Miscellaneous rocks............................................. 27 New Jersey........................................................... 28 Pennsylvania...... .^................................................. -29 Maryland and the District of Columbia.................................. 30 1. Peridotite and pyroxenite.. ......... ................'............ 30 2. Gabbro and diorite...........................'................... 31 3. Granite and gneiss.............................................. 33 4. Miscellaneous rocks............................................. 34 Virginia............................................................... 35 North Carolina.................................................:"....... 36 Georgia................................................................ 38 Kentucky............................................................ 38 1. Elliott County dike............................................... 38 2. Crittenden County dike.......:................................. 39 Tennessee.............................................................. 40 Missouri.............................................................. 40 Arkansas.............................................................. 41 Oklahoma................. ~........................................... 41 Texas................................................................ 41 Lake Superior region................................................... 45 1. Marquette region, Michigan..................................... 45 2. Crystal Falls district, Michigan.................................. 46 . 3. Keweenaw Point, Michigan..................................... 48 4. Menominee River............................................... 48 Sturgeon Falls gabbro............................................ 48 Lower Quinnesec Falls. ........................................ 49 Upper Quinnesec Falls........................................ 49 Schist from the Aragon iron mine............................... 50 ill IV CONTENTS. Analyses of igneous and crystalline rocks Continued. Lake Superior region Continued. Page. 5. Penokee-Gogebic region........................................ 50 6. Pigeon Point, Minnesota....................................... 51 7. Mesabi district, Minnesota...................................... 54 8. Miscellaneous rocks from Minnesota............................ 55 South Dakota........................................................ 57 Wyoming........................................................... 57 Yellowstone National Park and the Absaroka Range..................... 60 1. Electric Peak.................................................. 60 2. Sepulchre Mountain........................................... 62 3. Absaroka Range....................'..................,......... 63 CrandallBasin. .............................................. 63 Sunlight intrusives........................................... 65 Ishawooa intrusives.................................... T....... 65 Dikes in breccia.............................................. 66 4. Absarokite-shoshonite-banakite series............................ 67 5. Miscellaneous rocks....................:........................ 70 Montana. ............................................................ 74 1. Madison and Gallatin valleys.................................... 74 2. Butte district.................................................. 77 3. Boulder batholith.............................................. 79 4. Crazy Mountains............................................... 80 5. Little Belt Mountains .-. .^..................................... 83 6. Castle Mountain district......................................... 86 7. Highwood Mountains.... ....I.................................. 87 8. Little Rocky Mountains........................................ 90 9. Bearpaw Mountains............................................ 90 10. Elkhorn mining district........................................ 92 11. Bitterroot Range............................................... 93 12. Marysville district............................................... 93 13. Livingston quadrangle......................................... 94 14. Philipsburg quadrangle......................................... 95 Idaho.................................................................... 95 Colorado............................................................. 98 1. Denver Basin.................................................... 98 2. Pikes Peak district ............................................. 99 Granite...................................................... 99 Rocks of Cripple Creek district..............'................... 100 Miscellaneous rocks........................................... 103 3. Silver Cliff and Rosita......................................... 104 4. Buffalo Peaks. ................................................ 108 5. Leadville region................................................ 108 6. Tenmile district................................................. 109 7. Elk Mountains................................................. Ill 8. West Elk Mountains.............................................. Ill 9. La Plata Mountains. ........................................... 112 10. Silverton quadrangle.................... v ...................... 113 11. Ouray quadrangle.............................................. 114 12. Telluride quadrangle............................................ 115 13. Miscellaneous rocks............................................. 115 Utah................................................................. 118 1. Tintic district... .............................................. 118 2. Henry Mountains,...... T ..:....,,,...,,.,,.........,,,,..,.... 119 CONTENTS. V Analyses of igneous and crystalline rocks Continued. Utah Continued. Page. 3. Bingham district.............................................. 120 4. La Sal Mountains .....................i....................... 120 5. Park City district.............................. .^.............. 121 6. Miscellaneous rocks............................................ 122 New Mexico........................................................... 122 1. Basalts from the Rio Grande Canyon............................ 123 2. Mount Taylor region........................................ 123 3. Colfax County................ I............................... 123 4. Miscellaneous rocks;........................................... 124 Arizona.............................................................. 125 1. Globe district. ................................................ 125 2. Bradshaw Mountains quadrangle................................ 126 3. Morenci district...........................:................... 127 4. Miscellaneous rocks............................................ 127 Nevada........ ....................................................... 129 1. Tonopah district............................................... 129 2. Goldfield district............................................... 130 3. Bullfrog district................................................ -132 4. Miscellaneous rocks........................................... 132 California............................................................ 135 1. Mount Shasta.................................................. 135 2. Lassen Peak region............................................. 138 Rhyolites................................................. 138 Dacites and andesites..................................... 139 Basalts................................................... 142 3. Plumas County............................................... 144 4. Butte County................................................. 146 5. Sierra County.................................................. 147 6. Nevada City and Grass Valley.................................. 149 7. Placer County................................................. 150 8. Eldorado County..............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zunyite Al13si5o20cl(OH,F)18
    Zunyite Al13Si5O20Cl(OH; F)18 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Cubic. Point Group: 43m: As excellent tetrahedral or pseudo-octahedral crystals, may be modi¯ed by the cube, up to 2 cm. Twinning: On 111 , contact and penetration. f g Physical Properties: Cleavage: Good on 111 . Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 7 f g D(meas.) = 2.874(5) D(calc.) = 2.87{2.90 May °uoresce red under UV. Optical Properties: Transparent; may be more or less opaque from inclusions. Color: Grayish white, °esh-red; colorless in thin section. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Isotropic. n = 1.592{1.600 Cell Data: Space Group: F 43m: a = 13.8654{13.8882 Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Beni-Embarek, Algeria. 8.07 (100), 4.21 (100), 2.679 (90), 1.639 (90), 4.02 (60), 2.840 (50), 2.008 (50) Chemistry: (1) SiO2 24.33 Al2O3 57.88 Fe2O3 0.20 Li2O trace Na2O 0.24 K2O 0.10 F 5.61 Cl 2.91 H2O 10.89 P2O5 0.60 O = (F; Cl) 3.02 ¡ 2 Total 99.74 3+ (1) Zu~ni mine, Colorado, USA; corresponds to Al13:21Fe0:03P0:10Si4:66O20 Cl0:96[(OH)14:04F3:44]§=17:48: Occurrence: In highly aluminous shales and hydrothermally altered volcanic rocks. Association: Pyrophyllite, kaolinite, alunite, diaspore, rutile, pyrite, hematite, quartz. Distribution: In the USA, in the Zun~i mine, near Silverton, San Juan Co., and in the Charter Oak mine, Ouray Co., Colorado; near Silver City, Tintic district, Juab Co., Utah; in the Dome Rock Mountains, near Quartzsite, La Paz Co., Arizona, large crystals.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypersthene Syenite and Related Rocks of the Blue Ridge Region, Virginia1
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA V o l. 27, pp. 193-234 June 1, 1916 HYPERSTHENE SYENITE AND RELATED ROCKS OF THE BLUE RIDGE REGION, VIRGINIA1 BY THOMAS L. WATSON AND JUSTUS H. CLINE (Presented before the Society December 29, 191k) CONTENTS Page Introduction.................................................................................................................. 194 Previous geologic work............................................................................................. 196 Quartz-bearing hypersthene-andesine syenite...................................................... 197 Distribution.......................................................................................................... 197 Megascopic character......................................................................................... 198 Microscopic character........................................................................................ 199 Chemical composition and classification...................................................... 202 Comparison with quartz monzonite.............................................................. 204 Origin and application of name............................................................. 204 Chemical composition................................................................................ 205 Comparison with akerite.................................................................................. 206 Comparison with syenite (andesine anorthosite) of Nelson County, Virginia.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • US Geological Survey
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR *"! ' 5, GEOLOGICAL SURVEI PEGMATITE GEOLOGY OF THE SHELBY DISTRICT NORTH CAROLINA by \ Wallace R. Griffitts > \ I ,' -* U. S. Geological Survey ' ' OPEN FILE REPORT 5 Ihis report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Geological Suj'V*-'/ standards or nomenclature. COHTEHTS _ _ - Page Abstract Introduction. ........................... 1 Location and physical features ................ 1 Field work and acknowledgments ................ 2 Geology .............................. k Metamorphic rocks....................... h- Carolina gneiss ..................... Ij- General features .................. ^4- Lithology. ..................... k Biotite gneiss member. ............... 6 Battleground schist ................... 9 General features .................. 9 Lithology. ..................... 9 Hornblende schist and gneiss. .............. 11 General features .................. 11 Gabbroic rocks ................... 11 Hornblende schists ................. 13 Pyroxenite and associated rocks. .......... 13 Schist and granite complex. ................ 14- Igneous rocks. ........................ 15 Toluca quartz monzonite ................. 15 . : .r *- General features .................. 15 ^ c Lithology. ..................... 16 Yorkville granite .................... 19 General features .................. 19 Lithology. ..................... 20 Page CherryvlUe quartz monzonite. ............. 20 General features ................. 20 Relations to enclosing rocks ........... 23 Lithology.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Mineralogical Study of the La Hueca Cretaceous Iron-Manganese
    Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas ISSN: 1026-8774 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Corona Esquivel, Rodolfo; Ortega Gutiérrez, Fernando; Reyes Salas, Margarita; Lozano Santacruz, Rufino; Miranda Gasca, Miguel Angel Mineralogical study of the La Hueca Cretaceous Iron-Manganese deposit, Michoacán, south-western Mexico Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, vol. 17, núm. 2, 2000, pp. 142-151 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Querétaro, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57217206 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, volumen 17, número 2, 143 2000, p. 143- 153 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología, México, D.F MINERALOGICAL STUDY OF THE LA HUECA CRETACEOUS IRON- MANGANESE DEPOSIT, MICHOACÁN, SOUTHWESTERN MEXICO Rodolfo Corona-Esquivel1, Fernando Ortega-Gutiérrez1, Margarita Reyes-Salas1, Rufino Lozano-Santacruz1, and Miguel Angel Miranda-Gasca2 ABSTRACT In this work we describe for the first time the mineralogy and very briefly the possible origin of a banded Fe-Mn deposit associated with a Cretaceous volcanosedimentary sequence of the southern Guerrero terrane, near the sulfide massive volcanogenic deposit of La Minita. The deposit is confined within a felsic tuff unit; about 10 meters thick where sampled for chemical analysis. Using XRF, EDS and XRD techniques, we found besides todorokite, cryptomelane, quartz, romanechite (psilomelane), birnessite, illite-muscovite, cristobalite, chlorite, barite, halloysite, woodruffite, nacrite or kaolinite, and possibly hollandite-ferrian, as well as an amorphous material and two unknown manganese phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Crater Lake Reflections Summer-Fall 2018
    Crater Lake National Park National Park Service Crater Lake U.S. Department of the Interior Refections Visitor Guide Summer/Fall 2018 Park News 2 ... Camping, Lodging, Food Discovering Crater Lake 3 ... Ranger Programs f Water Restrictions in Effect Please help us conserve water during 12 Great Ways to Enjoy Your Stay 4 ... Hiking Trails your visit. In March, the state of 5 ... Driving Map Oregon declared a drought emergency The frst European-American to see Crater Lake was lucky to ... In the News: Bull Trout for our county. In 8 of the past 10 survive the experience. On June 12, 1853, gold prospector John 6 years, the park has received less snow Wesley Hillman was riding his mule up a long, sloping mountain. 7 ... Feature Article: Lake Level than normal. Last winter’s snow total He was lost, tired, and not paying attention to the terrain ahead. was 15 feet below average. While 8 ... Climate Chart Suddenly, his mule stopped. Hillman sat up and found himself you’re here, please take short showers, on the edge of a clif, gazing in astonishment at “the bluest and don’t run the tap, and reuse towels most beautiful body of water I had ever seen.” He added: “If and sheets if staying overnight in park Look Inside! I had been riding a blind mule, I frmly believe I would have lodging. Thanks for your help! ridden over the edge to death and destruction.” f Leave Your Drone at Home While mules—no matter how sharp their eyesight—are no longer Operating remote-controlled aircraft permitted to approach the rim of Crater Lake, there are many in the park is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Surface Reactions of Silicate Minerals
    RESEARCH BULLETIN 614 SEPTEMBER, 1956 UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION J. H. Longwell, Director The Surface Reactions Of Silicate Minerals PART II. REACTIONS OF FELDSPAR SURFACES WITH SALT SOLUTIONS. V. E. NASH AND C. E. MARSHALL (Publication authorized September 5, 1956) COLUMBIA, MISSOURI TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .......... .. 3 The Interaction of Albite with Salt Solutions . .. 4 The Interaction of Anorthite with Salt Solutions ........ .. 7 Relative Effectiveness of Ammonium Chloride and Magnesium Chloride on the Release of Sodium from Albite . .. 9 Surface Interaction of Albite with Salt Solutions in Methanol . .. 13 Experiments on Cationic Fixation ............................... 16 Detailed Exchange and Activity Studies with Individual Feldspars .......... .. 19 Procedure .. .. 20 Microcline . .. 21 Albite .................................................... 22 Oligoclase . .. 23 Andesine . .. 24 Labradori te . .. 25 Bytownite ................................................. 25 Anorthite . .. 27 Discussion ........ .. 28 Summary ..................................................... 35 References .. .. 36 Most of the experimental material of this and the preceding Research Bulletin is taken from the Ph.D. Thesis of Victor Nash, University of Missouri, June 1955. The experiments on cation fixation were carried our with the aid of a research grant from the Potash Rock Company of America, Lithonia, Georgia, for which the authors wish to record their appreciation. The work was part of Department of Soils Research Project No.6, entitled, "Heavy Clays." The Surface Reactions of Silicate Minerals PART II. REACTIONS OF FELDSPAR SURFACES WITH SALT SOLUTIONS. v. E. NASH AND C. E. MARSHALL INTRODUCTION The review of literature cited in Part I of this series indicates that little is known of the interaction of feldspar surfaces with salt solutions. The work of Breazeale and Magistad (1) clearly demonstrated that ex­ change reactions between potassium and calcium occur in the case of or­ thoclase surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Noritic Anorthosite Bodies in the Sierra Nevada Batholith
    MINERALOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, SPECIAL PAPER 1, 1963 INTERNATIONALMINERALOGICAL ASSOCIATION,PAPERS, THIRD GENERAL MEETING NORITIC ANORTHOSITE BODIES IN THE SIERRA NEVADA BATHOLITH ALDEN A. LOOMISl Department of Geology, Stanford University, Stanford, California ABSTRACT A group of small noritic plutons were intruded prior to the immediately surrounding granitic rocks in a part of the composite Sierra Nevada batholith near Lake Tahoe. Iron was more strongly concentrated in the late fluids of individual bodies than during the intrusive sequence as a whole. Pyroxenes are more ferrous in rocks late in the sequence, although most of the iron is in late magnetite which replaces pyroxenes. Both Willow Lake type and normal cumulative layering are present. Cumulative layering is rare; Willi ow Lake layering is common and was formed early in individual bodies. Willow Lake layers require a compositional uniqueness providing high ionic mobility to explain observed relations. The Sierran norites differ from those in large stratiform plutons in that (1) the average bulk composition is neritic anorthosite in which typical rocks contain over 20% AbO" and (2) differentiation of both orthopyroxene and plagioclase produced a smooth progressive sequence of mineral compositions. A plot of modal An vs. En for all the rocks in the sequence from early Willow Lake-type layers to late no rite dikes defines a smooth non-linear trend from Anss-En76 to An,,-En54. TLe ratio An/ Ab decreased faster than En/Of until the assemblage Anso-En65 was reached and En/Of began to decrease more rapidly. Similar plots for large stratiform bodies show too much scatter to define single curves.
    [Show full text]
  • Enstatite and Bronzite
    On Gem Or'thopyroxenes: Enstatite and Bronzite BY PETE J. DUNN, M.A., F.G.A. Department of Mineral Sciences Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20560 Introduction 1963). Although petrologists have sub- Enstatite and hypersthene are mem- divided this series into 6· subspecies bers of an isomorphous series of ortho- (Table I), the practicing gemologist is rhombic pyroxenes. The pure end primarily concerned with only the members of the series are enstatite, magnesium-rich members which yield MgSi03 and orthoferrosilite, Fe+2 some attractive gems. Adopting the Si03. Iron and magnesium substitute classification used by Deer et at. mutually between Mg100Fe+20 and (1963), enstatite is designated as a about Mg10Fe+290 (Deer et al., member of the series having 88% to TABLE I NOMENCLATURE OF THE ORTHOPYROXENES enstatite EnlOOFsO to En88Fs12 FeO < 6.50% bronzite En88Fs12 to En70Fs30 FeO> 6.50% hypersthene En70Fs30 to En50Fs50 FeO> 16.32% ferrohypersthene En50Fs50 to En30Fs70 FeO > 27.23% eolite En30Fs70 to En12Fs88 FeO > 38.12% orthoferrosil ite En12Fs88 to EnOFslOO FeO >47.92% En-Enstatite member Fs-Orthoferrosilite member 118 GEMS & GEMOLOGY 100% of the magnesium end member; rences include the noted Ceylon green- bronzite having 70% to 88% of the ish enstatite, and the dark green mate- magnesium end member and hypers- rial from the San Carlos Indian Reser- thene between 50% and 70% of the vation in Arizona (Sinkankas, 1959). magnesium end member. Members of All numbered specimens are from the series with Fe > Mg are usually the U.S. National Mineral Collection at opaque and of little gemological in- the Smithsonian Institution, Washing- terest.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineralogical Study of the Advanced Argillic Alteration Zone at the Konos Hill Mo–Cu–Re–Au Porphyry Prospect, NE Greece †
    Article Mineralogical Study of the Advanced Argillic Alteration Zone at the Konos Hill Mo–Cu–Re–Au Porphyry Prospect, NE Greece † Constantinos Mavrogonatos 1,*, Panagiotis Voudouris 1, Paul G. Spry 2, Vasilios Melfos 3, Stephan Klemme 4, Jasper Berndt 4, Tim Baker 5, Robert Moritz 6, Thomas Bissig 7, Thomas Monecke 8 and Federica Zaccarini 9 1 Faculty of Geology & Geoenvironment, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece; [email protected] 2 Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Geology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; [email protected] 4 Institut für Mineralogie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany; [email protected] (S.K.); [email protected] (J.B.) 5 Eldorado Gold Corporation, 1188 Bentall 5 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC V6C 2B5, Canada; [email protected] 6 Department of Mineralogy, University of Geneva, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland; [email protected] 7 Goldcorp Inc., Park Place, Suite 3400-666, Burrard St., Vancouver, BC V6C 2X8, Canada; [email protected] 8 Center for Mineral Resources Science, Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, 1516 Illinois Street, Golden, CO 80401, USA; [email protected] 9 Department of Applied Geosciences and Geophysics, University of Leoben, Leoben 8700, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30-698-860-8161 † The paper is an extended version of our paper published in 1st International Electronic Conference on Mineral Science, 16–21 July 2018. Received: 8 October 2018; Accepted: 22 October 2018; Published: 24 October 2018 Abstract: The Konos Hill prospect in NE Greece represents a telescoped Mo–Cu–Re–Au porphyry occurrence overprinted by deep-level high-sulfidation mineralization.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineralogy and Paragenesis of Amphiboles from Gibson Peak Pluton
    THE AIVIERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL. 49, SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER. 1964 MINERALOGY AND PARAGENESIS OF AMPHIBOLES FROM GIBSON PEAK PLUTON. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA PBrBn W. Lrelrlx, U. S. Geotogi,calSurvey, Denaer,Colorad,o. Ansrnacr Ixrnooucrrow Gibson Peak pluton, a 3-squaremile compositeintrusion in the Trin- itv Aips of northern california, is particularly suitablefor investigation of relations between amphibole paragenesisand igneouscrystallization becauseseveral distinctive amphiboles are important constituents of geneticallyrelated rocks that range from gabbro to trondhjemitic tona- lite. This paper describesthe sequenceof amphibole crystallization in difierent parts of the intrusion and reiates the compositionsof three newly analyzedamphiboles to crystallizationsequence and composition of the enclosingrock. The main conclusionis that compositionsof the investigatedamphiboles are as dependenton time of crystallizationwithin their respectiverocks as on bulk rock composition. Pnrnocn.q.pnrcrNtrnpnBTATroN oF THE Alrpnrsolr panecnNpsrs The generalstructural and petrologicfeatures of Gibson peak pluton are describedelsewhere (Lipman, 1963),and onl1-relations bearing on the origin of the amphibolesare summarizedhere. The pluton is com- posite,and five discreteintrusive units have beenrecognized on the basis of field relations.rn order of intrusion theseare hypersthene-hornblende gabbro, (augite-)hornblendegabbro, hornblende diorite, porphyritic quartz-bearingdiorite, and trondhjemitic biotite tonalite. All units show intrusive contacts with the preceding rocks, are petrographically dis- tinctive, and contain at least one amphibole. An interpretation of th" peak complex paragenesisof the Gibson amphiboles,based mainly on the textural featuresdescribed below, is presentedin Fig. 1. The evi- denceis clear orr the occurrenceof the indicated reactions,but the rela- 1321 PETER W. LIPMAN I I I F I I F I 1 I I cd d l :d d9 z z t.i r F-] {Fl z z.zt- z .=l il.
    [Show full text]
  • Mixite Bicu6(Aso4)3(OH)6 • 3H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1 Crystal Data: Hexagonal
    Mixite BiCu6(AsO4)3(OH)6 • 3H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Hexagonal. Point Group: 6/m. As acicular crystals, elongated along [0001], commonly in mats, radial fibrous aggregates, or cross-fiber veinlets. Physical Properties: Hardness = 3–4 D(meas.) = 3.79–3.83 D(calc.) = [4.04] Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Blue-green to emerald-green, pale green, white; pale green to colorless in transmitted light. Streak: Pale bluish green. Luster: Vitreous, silky in aggregates. Optical Class: Uniaxial (+). Pleochroism: O = colorless; E = bright green. Absorption: E > O. ω = 1.743–1.749 = 1.810–1.830 Cell Data: Space Group: P 63/m. a = 13.646(2) c = 5.920(1) Z = 2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Anton mine, Germany. 12.03 (10), 2.46 (9), 3.57 (8), 2.95 (7), 2.86 (6), 2.70 (6), 2.57 (6) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) P2O5 1.05 0.06 As2O5 29.51 28.79 29.64 SiO2 0.42 Fe2O3 0.97 Bi2O3 12.25 11.18 20.03 FeO 1.52 CuO 44.23 43.89 41.04 ZnO 2.70 CaO 0.83 0.26 H2O 11.06 11.04 9.29 Total 100.45 99.31 100.00 • (1) J´achymov, Czech Republic. (2) Tintic district, Utah, USA. (3) BiCu6(AsO4)3(OH)6 3H2O. Mineral Group: Mixite group. Occurrence: An uncommon secondary mineral in the oxidized zone of copper deposits. Association: Bismutite, smaltite, bismuth, atelestite, erythrite, malachite, barite. Distribution: From the Geister vein, Werner mine, J´achymov (Joachimsthal), Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • A Database of Plagioclase Crystal Preferred Orientations (CPO)
    Solid Earth, 4, 511–542, 2013 Open Access www.solid-earth.net/4/511/2013/ doi:10.5194/se-4-511-2013 Solid Earth © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. A database of plagioclase crystal preferred orientations (CPO) and microstructures – implications for CPO origin, strength, symmetry and seismic anisotropy in gabbroic rocks T. Satsukawa1,2,*, B. Ildefonse2, D. Mainprice2, L. F. G. Morales3, K. Michibayashi1,4, and F. Barou2 1Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Ohya 836, Shizuoka 422-8529, Japan 2Géosciences Montpellier, Université Montpellier 2 and CNRS, CC 060, 34095 Montpellier cedex 5, France 3Helmholtz Zentrum Potsdam, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 4Institute of Geosciences, Shizuoka University, Ohya 836, Shizuoka 422-8529, Japan *present address: ARC Center of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems (CCFS) and GEMOC National Key Centre, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia Correspondence to: T. Satsukawa ([email protected]) Received: 3 August 2013 – Published in Solid Earth Discuss.: 14 August 2013 Revised: 14 November 2013 – Accepted: 19 November 2013 – Published: 18 December 2013 Abstract. This study presents a unique database of 172 pla- ture compared with magmatic flow, and the large number gioclase Crystallographic Preferred Orientations (CPO) of of possible slip-systems in plagioclase probably account for variously deformed gabbroic rocks. The CPO characteris- these differences. Calculated seismic properties (P wave and tics as a function of the deformation regime (magmatic or S wave velocities and anisotropies) of plagioclase aggregates crystal-plastic) are outlined and discussed. The studied sam- show that anisotropy (up to 12 % for P wave and 14 % for ples are dominantly from slow- and fast-spread present-day S wave) tends to increase as a function of ODF J index.
    [Show full text]