DOCSLIB.ORG

Malware What Is Malware?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Malware What Is Malware? Malware What is malware? • Malware: malicious software • worm • ransomware • adware • virus • trojan horse • etc. … and how do we fight it? • AV software • Firewalls • Filtering • Patching • Writing more secure software • Training users How to Monetize Malware • Botnets • Networking infected computers together • Sending instructions to those computers to do things like: • Send spam • Mine cryptocurrency • Perform ad fraud • Perform DDoS attacks • Stealing banking credentials • Stealing Bitcoin and other alternative currencies • Ransoming the computer • Pay per install software How malware spreads • Attachments in emails • Other social engineering • Drive-by downloads • Spreading itself Vulnerabilities vs. Exploits • Vulnerability: hole in software • Exploit: code written to use vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to something • There’s way more known vulnerabilities than known exploits. • https://www.exploit-db.com/ vs. https://nvd.nist.gov/ Zero Day Attacks • Realized exploit comes before known vulnerability • Fairly rare • Zero days are expensive — 1.5 million USD for Apple iOS 10 exploit • Overwhelmingly, exploits in the wild are not 0day. Morris Worm • Created in 1988 by Robert Morris • Purportedly to measure the Internet • Infected 10% of computers connected to the Internet • Slowed down computers to where they became unusable. Morris Worm • Exploited Unix systems through: • sendmail • finger • rsh • weak passwords • Note that the vulnerabilities that he exploited were known. • Buggy: installed itself multiple times, didn’t phone home, etc. Effects of Morris Worm • CERT organizations worldwide • CERT-CC at CMU funded by the US gov • Patching known vulnerabilities • More attention to computer security Conficker • Computer worm first appearing in November 2008 • Sinkholed in 2009 • Good guys registered domain names used for attacks • Operators arrested in 2011 • Still infecting computers today • Millions of infections — hard to count. Conficker — how it spreads • Conficker-A: Vulnerability in Windows. Infected machines scanned IP space for more machines. • Conficker-B: Added infected USB devices, shared network folders with weak passwords. • Conficker C: Hardened new command and control infrastructure and added fake AV as a monitization. • Conficker D-E: Turned from centralized botnet to peer-to-peer Conficker Infections over Time Reaction to Conficker • Patch released before worm, yet patch rate was slow. • Large scale anti-botnet effort • Microsoft added security updates for unlicensed software • Conficker botnet shrank at a slower pace than the market share of Windows XP / Vista Stuxnet • Worm first known about in 2010, detected as early as 2005 • Built by the US and Israeli governments to attack Iranian nuclear program • Targets PLCs through Windows computers • Infected over 200,000 Windows machines Stuxnet - how it spreads • Use zero day exploits to compromise Windows machines • Spread using USB drives, peer-to-peer RPC • Bridges computers connected to the Internet with those that aren’t • Attacks files connected to certain SCADA software • Hijacks communication Reaction to Stuxnet • Cyberwarfare IRL • Car bomb attacks against Iranians by Iranian government • Some efforts to isolate important PLCs better: • Similar effort against North Korea failed • Doqu/Flame Drive by downloads • Website infected with malware • Malware injects code into webpage • That code infects those who visit it by directing them to an exploit kit through an intermediary How are websites targeted? • Find an exploit in a certain piece of software • Use Google Dorks to find websites with that vulnerability • Compromised advertising • Other ways? Exploit Kits • Each machine has different software on it • Uses a host of exploits to infect a machine • Exploit kits can be bought or rented Fake Antivirus • Installs itself on your machine and forces you to buy software • Many people buy this software • Largely shut down by shutting down payment processors Ransomware • Encrypts all your files using a key: • Old: same key for all • New: different key for each system • Requires victim to pay criminal to get files back: • Old: Payments through Western Union and the like • New: Payments through Bitcoin Computer Virus • A type of malicious software program ("malware") that, when executed, replicates itself by modifying other computer programs and inserting its own code. - Wikipedia Parts of a Virus • Infection vector: How a virus spreads • Trigger: Sets off the malicious functionality • Payload: The malicious functionality Phases of a Virus Scanning and Propagating Waiting for Dormant a trigger triggered Execute How do they infect? Malware Executable File How do they infect? Malware Executable File How do they infect? Malware Executable File How do they infect? Executable File Malware How do they infect? Malware Executable File Malware How do they infect? Malware How do they infect? Packer Executable File Malware How do they execute? Malware Executable File Line of code How do they execute? Malware Executable File Line of code Definitions • Self-Modifying code: Code that can change itself (usually without changing the functionality) • Polymorphic malware: Infects others with an encrypted copy of itself. Encryption and code changes. • Backdoor: Malware that leaves hidden ways of replicating itself • Rootkit: Malicious software to maintain access to system; good at hiding itself. ILOVEYOU • Bug in email: sent out messages subject:ILOVEYOU and attachment:LOVE-LETTER- FOR-YOU.txt.vbs • .vbs files were hidden • Propogation: Sent itself to all addresses in address book • Payload: Overwrote random files Adware • Software that contains unwanted ads Types of Ad Fraud • Pretend to be part of the ad chain and buy traffic, get paid. • Have bots, sell fake ad traffic • Disguise source of traffic to ads • Cookie stuffing — fake affiliate cookies • Ad Stacking — show invisible ads to consumer Adblock Plus • Browser-based Ad blocker • Let in some “acceptible” ads • Is this adware? Fraud? Fake Software • Stuffing ads into software • Maybe turning paid software into freeware? • Is this adware? fraud? DNSChanger • Upon infecting your computer, changed your routers’ nameserver settings. • Started in 2006. FBI raided in 2011. Shut down in 2012. Still alive today. • Main changes? Major ad networks • Is this adware? fraud? My Really Cool Toolbar • Lots of toolbars, other browser extensions • Useful functionality • Changed settings (homepage, etc) • Hard to Remove • Is this adware? fraud?.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Downadup Codex a Comprehensive Guide to the Threat’S Mechanics
    Security Response The Downadup Codex A comprehensive guide to the threat’s mechanics. Edition 2.0 Introduction Contents Introduction.............................................................1 Since its appearance in late-2008, the Downadup worm has become Editor’s Note............................................................5 one of the most wide-spread threats to hit the Internet for a number of Increase in exploit attempts against MS08-067.....6 years. A complex piece of malicious code, this threat was able to jump W32.Downadup infection statistics.........................8 certain network hurdles, hide in the shadows of network traffic, and New variants of W32.Downadup.B find new ways to propagate.........................................10 defend itself against attack with a deftness not often seen in today’s W32.Downadup and W32.Downadup.B threat landscape. Yet it contained few previously unseen features. What statistics................................................................12 set it apart was the sheer number of tricks it held up its sleeve. Peer-to-peer payload distribution...........................15 Geo-location, fingerprinting, and piracy...............17 It all started in late-October of 2008, we began to receive reports of A lock with no key..................................................19 Small improvements yield big returns..................21 targeted attacks taking advantage of an as-yet unknown vulnerability Attempts at smart network scanning...................23 in Window’s remote procedure call (RPC) service. Microsoft quickly Playing with Universal Plug and Play...................24 released an out-of-band security patch (MS08-067), going so far as to Locking itself out.................................................27 classify the update as “critical” for some operating systems—the high- A new Downadup variant?......................................29 Advanced crypto protection.................................30 est designation for a Microsoft Security Bulletin.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Mortem of a Zombie: Conficker Cleanup After Six Years Hadi Asghari, Michael Ciere, and Michel J.G
    Post-Mortem of a Zombie: Conficker Cleanup After Six Years Hadi Asghari, Michael Ciere, and Michel J.G. van Eeten, Delft University of Technology https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity15/technical-sessions/presentation/asghari This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 24th USENIX Security Symposium August 12–14, 2015 • Washington, D.C. ISBN 978-1-939133-11-3 Open access to the Proceedings of the 24th USENIX Security Symposium is sponsored by USENIX Post-Mortem of a Zombie: Conficker Cleanup After Six Years Hadi Asghari, Michael Ciere and Michel J.G. van Eeten Delft University of Technology Abstract more sophisticated C&C mechanisms that are increas- ingly resilient against takeover attempts [30]. Research on botnet mitigation has focused predomi- In pale contrast to this wealth of work stands the lim- nantly on methods to technically disrupt the command- ited research into the other side of botnet mitigation: and-control infrastructure. Much less is known about the cleanup of the infected machines of end users. Af- effectiveness of large-scale efforts to clean up infected ter a botnet is successfully sinkholed, the bots or zom- machines. We analyze longitudinal data from the sink- bies basically remain waiting for the attackers to find hole of Conficker, one the largest botnets ever seen, to as- a way to reconnect to them, update their binaries and sess the impact of what has been emerging as a best prac- move the machines out of the sinkhole. This happens tice: national anti-botnet initiatives that support large- with some regularity. The recent sinkholing attempt of scale cleanup of end user machines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Botnet Chronicles a Journey to Infamy
    The Botnet Chronicles A Journey to Infamy Trend Micro, Incorporated Rik Ferguson Senior Security Advisor A Trend Micro White Paper I November 2010 The Botnet Chronicles A Journey to Infamy CONTENTS A Prelude to Evolution ....................................................................................................................4 The Botnet Saga Begins .................................................................................................................5 The Birth of Organized Crime .........................................................................................................7 The Security War Rages On ........................................................................................................... 8 Lost in the White Noise................................................................................................................. 10 Where Do We Go from Here? .......................................................................................................... 11 References ...................................................................................................................................... 12 2 WHITE PAPER I THE BOTNET CHRONICLES: A JOURNEY TO INFAMY The Botnet Chronicles A Journey to Infamy The botnet time line below shows a rundown of the botnets discussed in this white paper. Clicking each botnet’s name in blue will bring you to the page where it is described in more detail. To go back to the time line below from each page, click the ~ at the end of the section. 3 WHITE
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Security CS 426 Lecture 15
    Computer Security CS 426 Lecture 15 Malwares CS426 Fall 2010/Lecture 15 1 Trapdoor • SttitittSecret entry point into a system – Specific user identifier or password that circumvents normal security procedures. • Commonlyyy used by developers – Could be included in a compiler. CS426 Fall 2010/Lecture 15 2 Logic Bomb • Embedded in legitimate programs • Activated when specified conditions met – E.g., presence/absence of some file; Particular date/time or particular user • When triggered, typically damages system – Modify/delete files/disks CS426 Fall 2010/Lecture 15 3 Examppgle of Logic Bomb • In 1982 , the Trans-Siber ian Pipe line inc iden t occurred. A KGB operative was to steal the plans fhititdtltditfor a sophisticated control system and its software from a Canadian firm, for use on their Siberi an pi peli ne. The CIA was tippe d o ff by documents in the Farewell Dossier and had the company itlibbithinsert a logic bomb in the program for sabotage purposes. This eventually resulted in "the most monu mental non-nu clear ex plosion and fire ever seen from space“. CS426 Fall 2010/Lecture 15 4 Trojan Horse • Program with an overt Example: Attacker: (expected) and covert effect Place the following file cp /bin/sh /tmp/.xxsh – Appears normal/expected chmod u+s,o+x /tmp/.xxsh – Covert effect violates security policy rm ./ls • User tricked into executing ls $* Trojan horse as /homes/victim/ls – Expects (and sees) overt behavior – Covert effect performed with • Victim user’s authorization ls CS426 Fall 2010/Lecture 15 5 Virus • Self-replicating
    [Show full text]
  • Iptrust Botnet / Malware Dictionary This List Shows the Most Common Botnet and Malware Variants Tracked by Iptrust
    ipTrust Botnet / Malware Dictionary This list shows the most common botnet and malware variants tracked by ipTrust. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list, since new threat intelligence is always being added into our global Reputation Engine. NAME DESCRIPTION Conficker A/B Conficker A/B is a downloader worm that is used to propagate additional malware. The original malware it was after was rogue AV - but the army's current focus is undefined. At this point it has no other purpose but to spread. Propagation methods include a Microsoft server service vulnerability (MS08-067) - weakly protected network shares - and removable devices like USB keys. Once on a machine, it will attach itself to current processes such as explorer.exe and search for other vulnerable machines across the network. Using a list of passwords and actively searching for legitimate usernames - the ... Mariposa Mariposa was first observed in May 2009 as an emerging botnet. Since then it has infected an ever- growing number of systems; currently, in the millions. Mariposa works by installing itself in a hidden location on the compromised system and injecting code into the critical process ͞ĞdžƉůŽƌĞƌ͘ĞdžĞ͘͟/ƚŝƐknown to affect all modern Windows versions, editing the registry to allow it to automatically start upon login. Additionally, there is a guard that prevents deletion while running, and it automatically restarts upon crash/restart of explorer.exe. In essence, Mariposa opens a backdoor on the compromised computer, which grants full shell access to ... Unknown A botnet is designated 'unknown' when it is first being tracked, or before it is given a publicly- known common name.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Infrastructure Review Vol.15 -Infrastructure Security
    1. Infrastructure Security The Revised Unauthorized Computer Access Law In this volume we examine the revised Unauthorized Computer Access Law, and discuss the DNS Changer malware as well as the Ghost Domain Name issue relating to DNS. Infrastructure Security 1.1 Introduction This report summarizes incidents to which IIJ responded, based on general information obtained by IIJ itself related to the stable operation of the Internet, information from observations of incidents, information acquired through our services, and information obtained from companies and organizations with which IIJ has cooperative relationships. This volume covers the period of time from January 1 to March 31, 2012. Following on from the previous period, with an increase in the number of smartphone users, there have been an increasing number of problems related to the handling of information on the devices and user information. Hacktivism-based attacks such as those by Anonymous also continued to occur, and the number of attacks on companies and government agencies remained at a high level. In Middle-Eastern countries and Israel there were a series of hacking incidents and information leaks, as well as DDoS attacks on websites including critical infrastructure. Regarding vulnerabilities, an issue was discovered and fixed in multiple cache DNS server implementations including BIND. As seen above, the Internet continues to experience many security-related incidents. 1.2 Incident Summary Here, we discuss the IIJ handling and response to incidents Other 19.7% Vulnerabilities 20.6% that occurred between January 1 and March 31, 2012. Figure 1 shows the distribution of incidents handled during this period*1.
    [Show full text]
  • Darpa Starts Sleuthing out Disloyal Troops
    UNCLASSIFIED (U) FBI Tampa Division CI Strategic Partnership Newsletter JANUARY 2012 (U) Administrative Note: This product reflects the views of the FBI- Tampa Division and has not been vetted by FBI Headquarters. (U) Handling notice: Although UNCLASSIFIED, this information is property of the FBI and may be distributed only to members of organizations receiving this bulletin, or to cleared defense contractors. Precautions should be taken to ensure this information is stored and/or destroyed in a manner that precludes unauthorized access. 10 JAN 2012 (U) The FBI Tampa Division Counterintelligence Strategic Partnership Newsletter provides a summary of previously reported US government press releases, publications, and news articles from wire services and news organizations relating to counterintelligence, cyber and terrorism threats. The information in this bulletin represents the views and opinions of the cited sources for each article, and the analyst comment is intended only to highlight items of interest to organizations in Florida. This bulletin is provided solely to inform our Domain partners of news items of interest, and does not represent FBI information. In the JANUARY 2012 Issue: Article Title Page NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT NEWS FROM GOVERNMENT AGENCIES: American Jihadist Terrorism: Combating a Complex Threat p. 2 Authorities Uncover Increasing Number of United States-Based Terror Plots p. 3 Chinese Counterfeit COTS Create Chaos For The DoD p. 4 DHS Releases Cyber Strategy Framework p. 6 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE THREAT ITEMS FROM THE PRESS: United States Homes In on China Spying p. 6 Opinion: China‟s Spies Are Catching Up p. 8 Canadian Politician‟s Chinese Crush Likely „Sexpionage,‟ Former Spies Say p.
    [Show full text]
  • Munkavállalói Adatok Szivárogtak Az Nvidiatól
    Munkavállalói adatok szivárogtak az Nvidiatól 2015.01.05. 09:58 | Csizmazia Darab István [Rambo] | Szólj hozzá! Címkék: nvidia jelszó incidens security adatszivárgás jelszócsere breach welivesecurity.com A nagy adatlopási ügyek mellett történnek azért rendre "kisebb" horderejű, de azért szintén fontos biztonsági incidensek is, amelyek szintén nem tanulság nélkül valóak. Ezúttal az Nvidia háza táján történt olyan, dolgozói adatokat érintő adatlopás még decemberben, amely miatt a cég jelszóváltoztatásra és óvatosságra figyelmeztette saját munkavállalóit. A Forbes beszámolója szerint a jelszavak azonnali megváltoztatása mellett arra is kiemelten felhívták a figyelmet, hogy fokozott óvatossággal kezeljenek minden kéretlen levélben érkező adathalász próbálkozást. Ilyen esetekben ugyanis a kiszivárgott személyes információk birtokában sokszor testre-szabott, személyes hangvételű banki vagy látszólag munkatársak, barátok nevében érkező, és jelszavainkkal kapcsolatos kéréseket tartalmazó phishing megkeresések is érkezhetnek. A fenti hamis megkeresési trükkök mellett a dolgozóknak érdekes módon általában nehezükre esik elfogadni a valóságos belső fenyegetés veszélyét is, pedig a támadások, adatszivárgások alkalmával számos esetben van valamilyen belső szál is. Emellett emlékezetes lehet, hogy annak idején több mint 20 olyan embert azonosítottak, akik simán megadták az azonosítójukat és a jelszavukat Snowdennek, aki kollégái hozzáférését is felhasználta az adatgyűjtései és kiszivárogtatásai során. Mivel az eset több, mint 500 dolgozót is érinthetett,
    [Show full text]
  • Download Slides
    Scott Wu Point in time cleaning vs. RTP MSRT vs. Microsoft Security Essentials Threat events & impacts More on MSRT / Security Essentials MSRT Microsoft Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Deployed to Windows Update, etc. monthly since 2005 On-demand scan on prevalent malware Microsoft Security Essentials Full AV RTP Inception in Oct 2009 RTP is the solution One-off cleaner has its role Quiikck response Workaround Baseline ecosystem cleaning Industrypy response & collaboration Threat Events Worms (some are bots) have longer lifespans Rogues move on quicker MarMar 2010 2010 Apr Apr 2010 2010 May May 2010 2010 Jun Jun 2010 2010 Jul Jul 2010 2010 Aug Aug 2010 2010 1,237,15 FrethogFrethog 979,427 979,427 Frethog Frethog 880,246880,246 Frethog Frethog465,351 TaterfTaterf 5 1,237,155Taterf Taterf 797,935797,935 TaterfTaterf 451,561451,561 TaterfTaterf 497,582 497,582 Taterf Taterf 393,729393,729 Taterf Taterf447,849 FrethogFrethog 535,627535,627 AlureonAlureon 493,150 493,150 AlureonAlureon 436,566 436,566 RimecudRimecud 371,646 371,646 Alureon Alureon 308,673308,673 Alureon Alureon 441,722 RimecudRimecud 341,778341,778 FrethogFrethog 473,996473,996 BubnixBubnix 348,120 348,120 HamweqHamweq 289,603 289,603 Rimecud Rimecud289,629 289,629 Rimecud Rimecud318,041 AlureonAlureon 292,810 292,810 BubnixBubnix 471,243 471,243 RimecudRimecud 287,942287,942 ConfickerConficker 286,091286, 091 Hamwe Hamweqq 250,286250, 286 Conficker Conficker220,475220, 475 ConfickerConficker 237237,348, 348 RimecudRimecud 280280,440, 440 VobfusVobfus 251251,335, 335
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Nature of Groups Engaged in Cyber Crime
    International Journal of Cyber Criminology Vol 8 Issue 1 January - June 2014 Copyright © 2014 International Journal of Cyber Criminology (IJCC) ISSN: 0974 – 2891 January – June 2014, Vol 8 (1): 1–20. This is an Open Access paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non- Commercial-Share Alike License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This license does not permit commercial exploitation or the creation of derivative works without specific permission. Organizations and Cyber crime: An Analysis of the Nature of Groups engaged in Cyber Crime Roderic Broadhurst,1 Peter Grabosky,2 Mamoun Alazab3 & Steve Chon4 ANU Cybercrime Observatory, Australian National University, Australia Abstract This paper explores the nature of groups engaged in cyber crime. It briefly outlines the definition and scope of cyber crime, theoretical and empirical challenges in addressing what is known about cyber offenders, and the likely role of organized crime groups. The paper gives examples of known cases that illustrate individual and group behaviour, and motivations of typical offenders, including state actors. Different types of cyber crime and different forms of criminal organization are described drawing on the typology suggested by McGuire (2012). It is apparent that a wide variety of organizational structures are involved in cyber crime. Enterprise or profit-oriented activities, and especially cyber crime committed by state actors, appear to require leadership, structure, and specialisation. By contrast, protest activity tends to be less organized, with weak (if any) chain of command. Keywords: Cybercrime, Organized Crime, Crime Groups; Internet Crime; Cyber Offenders; Online Offenders, State Crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Containing Conficker to Tame a Malware
    &#4#5###4#(#%#5#6#%#5#&###,#'#(#7#5#+#&#8##9##:65#,-;/< Know Your Enemy: Containing Conficker To Tame A Malware The Honeynet Project http://honeynet.org Felix Leder, Tillmann Werner Last Modified: 30th March 2009 (rev1) The Conficker worm has infected several million computers since it first started spreading in late 2008 but attempts to mitigate Conficker have not yet proved very successful. In this paper we present several potential methods to repel Conficker. The approaches presented take advantage of the way Conficker patches infected systems, which can be used to remotely detect a compromised system. Furthermore, we demonstrate various methods to detect and remove Conficker locally and a potential vaccination tool is presented. Finally, the domain name generation mechanism for all three Conficker variants is discussed in detail and an overview of the potential for upcoming domain collisions in version .C is provided. Tools for all the ideas presented here are freely available for download from [9], including source code. !"#$%&'()*+&$(% The big years of wide-area network spreading worms were 2003 and 2004, the years of Blaster [1] and Sasser [2]. About four years later, in late 2008, we witnessed a similar worm that exploits the MS08-067 server service vulnerability in Windows [3]: Conficker. Like its forerunners, Conficker exploits a stack corruption vulnerability to introduce and execute shellcode on affected Windows systems, download a copy of itself, infect the host and continue spreading. SRI has published an excellent and detailed analysis of the malware [4]. The scope of this paper is different: we propose ideas on how to identify, mitigate and remove Conficker bots.
    [Show full text]
  • ILOVEYOU” Computer Virus Emphasizes Critical Need for Agency and Governmentwide Improvements
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Technology, Committee on Science, House of Representatives For Release on Delivery Expected at 10 a.m. INFORMATION Wednesday, May 10, 2000 SECURITY “ILOVEYOU” Computer Virus Emphasizes Critical Need for Agency and Governmentwide Improvements Statement of Keith A. Rhodes Director, Office of Computer and Information Technology Assessment Accounting and Information Management Division GAO/T-AIMD-00-171 Madam Chairwoman and Members of the Subcommittee: Thank you for inviting me to participate in today’s hearing on the “ILOVEYOU” computer virus. About this time last year, I testified before this Subcommittee on the “Melissa” virus, which temporarily disrupted the operations of some agencies by forcing them to shut down their e- mail systems.1 At that hearing, I stressed that the next virus would likely propagate faster, do more damage, and be more difficult to detect and counter. This is just what we have experienced with ILOVEYOU. While it looked a lot like Melissa in its operation, it moved much more swiftly, and it appears to have caused as much, if not more, disruption. Nevertheless, the lessons to be gleaned from both attacks are the same. Federal agencies must implement vigorous security programs to enable them to closely watch their information resources for signs of attack or intrusion and to quickly react to such events when detected. Moreover, the government as a whole must promptly implement long-term solutions that will ensure that agencies focus on security from an organizationwide perspective and implement a comprehensive set of security controls. It must also establish central tracking and reporting mechanisms to facilitate analyses of these and other forms of attacks and their impact.
    [Show full text]