Memorandum on Assistance to Iraqi Democratic Opposition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Memorandum on Assistance to Iraqi Democratic Opposition Administration of William J. Clinton, 1999 / Feb. 5 199 As I said, I'm working hard within my own NOTE: The President spoke at 11:45 a.m. in Impe- party to build a consensus on this, and at rial Ballroom A at the Grand Hyatt Hotel. In his the same time I'm trying to reach out to Re- remarks, he referred to foundation president publicans to build a consensus with them. Roger G. Ackerman, chairman and chief executive But I do not believe we can continue to grow officer, Corning, Inc.; former Secretary of Com- the American economy and raise American merce Malcolm Baldrige's sister, Letitia Baldrige; foundation chairpersons Barry K. Rogstad, presi- incomes and reach into America's distressed dent, American Business Conference, and Rob- neighborhoods unless we continue, also, to erts T. Jones, president and chief executive offi- reach out to the rest of the world. cer, National Alliance of Business; and foundation Furthermore, I believe we can minimize trustee Earnest W. Deavenport, Jr., chairman and the likelihood that we will ever have to send chief executive officer, Eastman Chemical Co. our men and women in uniform into a big conflict if we have economic and other co- operation with countries that show that there Memorandum on Assistance to Iraqi are other ways to solve your difficulties than Democratic Opposition taking up arms and robbing children of their future. Organizations So that's what I think we ought to do. I'm February 4, 1999 glad we're doing well. I am grateful for hav- ing had the chance to serve. I am very mind- Presidential Determination No. 99±13 ful of the fact that a lot of the credit for America's success goes to companies and the Memorandum for the Secretary of State people who work for them, like those we honor today. But I am absolutely certain that Subject: Designations Under the Iraq this is not the time to sort of sit back on Liberation Act of 1998 our laurels and say, ``Isn't this nice. We've Pursuant to the authority vested in me as waited for 40 years for a time like this. I think President of the United States, including I'll take a vacation.'' under section 5 of the Iraq Liberation Act This is a time to take this prosperity we of 1998 (Public Law 105±338) (the ``Act''), have and this confidence we have and expand I hereby determine that each of the following our efforts. We can meet the long-term chal- groups is a democratic opposition organiza- lenges of the 21st century. We can alleviate tion and that each satisfies the criteria set the looming specter that the baby boom forth in section 5(c) of the Act: the Iraqi Na- might bankrupt our children and our grand- tional Accord, the Iraqi National Congress, children to pay for our retirement. We can the Islamic Movement of Iraqi Kurdistan, the guarantee a secure retirement, a compact Kurdistan Democratic Party, the Movement within the generations, and we can pay down for Constitutional Monarchy, the Patriotic the national debt and guarantee low interest Union of Kurdistan, and the Supreme Coun- rates and a stable situation and more capital cil for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq. I here- to invest in the private sector for 15 years. by designate each of these organizations as We can improve our education and training eligible to receive assistance under section systems. We can invest in our inner cities. 4 of the Act. We can expand trade. That is an economic agenda that will set a framework within You are authorized and directed to report which more companies who follow your lead this determination and designation to the will find the same kind of success that you Congress and arrange for its publication in have. the Federal Register. And remember what I said when I started. America wouldn't have nearly the problems William J. Clinton we have today if everybody was as happy on the job as you are. NOTE: This message was released by the Office Thank you, and good luck. of the Press Secretary on February 5. VerDate 12-JAN-99 09:06 Feb 10, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00001 Frm 00043 Fmt 1244 Sfmt 1244 W:\DISC\P05FE4.004 atx006 PsN: atx006 200 Feb. 5 / Administration of William J. Clinton, 1999 Message to the Congress Reporting At the same time, NATO agreed that we do on Efforts To Achieve a Sustainable not intend to maintain SFOR's presence at Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina current levels indefinitely, and in fact agreed February 4, 1999 on initial reductions, which I will describe later in this report. Below is a benchmark- To the Congress of the United States: by-benchmark evaluation of the state-of-play Pursuant to section 7 of Public Law 105± in BiH based on analysis of input from mul- 174, I am providing this report to inform the tiple sources. Congress of ongoing efforts to achieve sus- 1. Military Stability. Aim: Maintain Day- tainable peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina ton cease-fire. Considerable progress has (BiH). This is the first semiannual report that been made toward military stabilization in evaluates progress in BiH against the ten BiH. Entity Armed Forces (EAFs) are in benchmarks (``aims'') outlined in my certifi- compliance with Dayton, and there have cation to the Congress of March 3, 1998. been no incidents affecting the cease-fire. NATO adopted these benchmarks on May EAFs remain substantially divided along eth- 28, 1998, as part of its approval of the Sta- nic lines. Integration of the Federation Army bilization Force (SFOR) military operations does not reach down to corps-level units and plan (OPLAN 10407). The Steering Board below. However, progress has been made of the Peace Implementation Council (PIC) through the Train and Equip Program to in- subsequently adopted corresponding bench- tegrate the Ministry of Defense and to pro- marks in its Luxembourg Declaration of June vide the Federation with a credible deterrent 9, 1998. capability. Although it is unlikely to meet its NATO, the Office of the High Representa- target of full integration by August 1999, the tive (OHR) and my Administration have co- Federation Ministry of Defense has begun ordinated closely in evaluating progress on staff planning for integration. The Bosnian Dayton implementation based on these Serb Army (VRS) continues its relationship benchmarks. There is general agreement that with the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia there has been considerable progress in the (FRY) Army. Similarly, the Bosnian Croat past year. The basic institutions of the state, element of the Federation Army maintains both political and economic, have been es- ties with Croatia. In both cases, however, tablished. Key laws regarding foreign invest- limited resources impinge on what either ment, privatization, and property are now in Croatia or the FRY can provide financially place. Freedom of movement across the or materially; the overall trend in support is country has substantially improved. Fun- downward. In some areas, the VRS continues damental reform of the media is underway. to have certain qualitative and quantitative Elections have demonstrated a continuing advantages over the Federation Army, but trend towards growing pluralism. Neverthe- the Train and Equip Program has helped less, there is still much to be done, in particu- narrow the gap in some key areas. The arms lar on interethnic tolerance and reconcili- control regimes established under Articles II ation, the development of effective common (confidence and security-building measures) institutions with powers clearly delineated and IV (arms reduction and limitations) of from those of the Entities, and an open and Annex 1±B of the Dayton Peace Accords are pluralistic political life. The growth of orga- functioning. In October 1997, BiH and the nized crime also represents a serious threat. other parties were recognized as being in With specific reference to SFOR, the Sec- compliance with the limitations on five major retaries of State and Defense, in meetings types of armaments (battle tanks, armored in December 1998 with their NATO coun- combat vehicles, artillery, combat aircraft, terparts, agreed that SFOR continues to play and attack helicopters) set forth in the Article an essential role in the maintenance of peace IV agreement, which were derived from the and stability and the provision of a secure Annex 1B 5:2:2 ratios for the FRY, Republic environment in BiH, thus contributing sig- of Croatia, and BiH respectively. The parties nificantly to progress in rebuilding BiH as have since maintained armament levels con- a single, democratic, and multiethnic state. sistent with the limitations and are expected VerDate 12-JAN-99 09:06 Feb 10, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00001 Frm 00044 Fmt 1244 Sfmt 1244 W:\DISC\P05FE4.005 atx006 PsN: atx006.
Recommended publications
  • GAO-04-559 State Department: Issues Affecting Funding of Iraqi National Congress Support Foundation
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters April 2004 STATE DEPARTMENT Issues Affecting Funding of Iraqi National Congress Support Foundation a GAO-04-559 April 2004 STATE DEPARTMENT Issues Affecting Funding of Iraqi National Highlights of GAO-04-559, a report to Congress Support Foundation congressional requesters As part of the efforts by the United State’s funding of INCSF programs totaled nearly $33 million for the period States to oust Saddam Hussein, a March 2000 through September 2003. This money was made available critical element of U.S. policy through 23 cooperative agreements and amendments that provided short- included funding the Iraqi National term funding at irregular intervals. The funds were provided for several Congress as the lead Iraqi purposes, including establishing new satellite television capability (Liberty opposition coalition. In 1999, the TV), newspaper publication, and information collection programs. About Iraqi National Congress Support Foundation (INCSF) was $10 million was earmarked for Liberty TV broadcasting activities, which established to provide an included hiring staff, establishing studio operations, and actual broadcasting. organizational structure for There were several periods during which State did not have an agreement to Department of State funding. From fund INCSF’s program, causing State to later fund INCSF activities March 2000 until September 2003, retroactively. State’s funding approach affected INCSF’s ability to conduct the Department of State funded television broadcast operations. Liberty TV broadcasted from August 2001 several INCSF programs, including to May 2002, when funding shortages caused by funding and policy disputes television broadcasting. INCSF’s between State and INCSF resulted in termination of broadcasting.
    [Show full text]
  • Shia-Islamist Political Actors in Iraq Who Are They and What Do They Want? Søren Schmidt DIIS REPORT 2008:3 DIIS REPORT
    DIIS REPORT 2008:3 SHIA-IsLAMIST POLITICAL ACTORS IN IRAQ WHO Are THEY AND WHAT do THEY WANT? Søren Schmidt DIIS REPORT 2008:3 DIIS REPORT DIIS · DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES 1 DIIS REPORT 2008:3 © Copenhagen 2008 Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS Strandgade 56, DK -1401 Copenhagen, Denmark Ph: +45 32 69 87 87 Fax: +45 32 69 87 00 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.diis.dk Cover Design: Carsten Schiøler Layout: mgc design, Jens Landorph Printed in Denmark by Vesterkopi AS ISBN: 978-87-7605-247-8 Price: DKK 50.00 (VAT included) DIIS publications can be downloaded free of charge from www.diis.dk Hardcopies can be ordered at www.diis.dk. 2 DIIS REPORT 2008:3 Contents Abstract 4 1. Introduction 5 2. The Politicisation of Shia-Islam 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 The History of Shia-Islamism in Iraq 8 3. Contemporary Shia-Islamist political actors 15 3.1 Ali Husseini Sistani 15 3.2 The Da’wa Party 21 3.3 SCIRI 24 3.4 Moqtada al-Sadr 29 4. Conclusion: Conflict or Cooperation? 33 Bibliography 35 3 DIIS REPORT 2008:3 Abstract The demise of the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq in 2003 was an important wa- tershed in Iraqi political history. Iraq had been governed by groups which belonged to the Arab Sunni minority since the Iraqi state emerged out of the former Otto- man Empire in 1921. More recently, new political actors are in the ascendancy, rep- resenting the Kurdish minority and the Shia majority in Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Buttressing Peace with the Iraqi Inter-Religious Congress
    Religion and Conflict Case Study Series Iraq: Buttressing Peace with the Iraqi Inter-Religious Congress August 2013 © Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/resources/classroom 4 Abstract 5 This case study shines a light on the sectarian violence that overtook Iraq after the 2003 US-led invasion that overthrew Saddam Hussein, and how religious 9 leaders gradually gained recognition as resources for the promotion of peace. This overview of the conflict addresses five main questions: What religious 11 factors contributed to insecurity in post-2003 Iraq? How did Coalition forces approach religious actors prior to 2006? How did governments interface with faith-based NGOs in pursuit of peace? What role did socioeconomic factors 14 play in exacerbating conflict? How did religious engagement intersect with the Sunni Awakening and the surge of Coalition troops in 2007? The case study includes a core text, a timeline of key events, a guide to relevant religious orga- nizations, and a list of further readings. 15 About this Case Study 17 This case study was crafted under the editorial direction of Eric Patterson, visiting assistant professor in the Department of Government and associate di- rector of the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs at George- town University. This case study was made possible through the support of the Henry Luce Foundation and the Luce/SFS Program on Religion and International Affairs. 2 BERKLEY CENTER FOR RELIGION, PEACE & WORLD AFFAIRS AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY CASE STUDY — IRAQ Contents Introduction 4 Historical Background 5 Domestic Factors 9 International Factors 11 Religion and Socioeconomic Factors 12 Conclusion 14 Resources Key Events 15 Religious Organizations 17 Further Reading 19 Discussion Questions 21 BERKLEY CENTER FOR RELIGION, PEACE & WORLD AFFAIRS AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY CASE STUDY — IRAQ 3 Introduction While the US invasion of Iraq—and the insurgency that a shaky relationship with the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Outcome of Invasion: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq
    a report of the csis burke chair in strategy The Outcome of Invasion: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq Authors Adam Mausner Sam Khazai Anthony H. Cordesman Peter Alsis Charles Loi March 2012 Chapter VII: US Strategic Competition with Iran: Competition in Iraq 16/3/12 2 Executive Summary "Americans planted a tree in Iraq. They watered that tree, pruned it, and cared for it. Ask your American friends why they're leaving now before the tree bears fruit." --Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.1 Iraq has become a key focus of the strategic competition between the United States and Iran. The history of this competition has been shaped by the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), the 1991 Gulf War, the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, and now by the withdrawal of US military forces. It is a competition increasingly shaped by Iraq’s turbulent domestic politics and power struggles, and where both the US and Iran compete to shape the structure of Iraq’s future politics, governance, economics, and security. An Uncertain Level of US Influence The US has gone to great lengths to counter Iranian influence in Iraq, including using its status as an occupying power and Iraq’s main source of aid, as well as through information operations and more traditional press statements highlighting Iranian meddling. However, containing Iranian influence, while important, is not America’s main goal in Iraq. It is rather to create a stable democratic Iraq that can defeat the remaining extremist and insurgent elements, defend against foreign threats, sustain an able civil society, and emerge as a stable power friendly to the US and its Gulf allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East Report
    MIDDLE EAST REPORT \ \. \ i y 1.4 \i Number 189 $4.50 / £3.50 MIDDLE EAST RESEAi^CH & INFORMATION PROJECT July-August 1994 No. 189 Vol. 24 No. 4 Middle East Report (ISSN 0899-2851 ) is pub- THE KURDISH EXPERIENCE li',h«l SIX lifw;'; a yoar (bi-rnorithly) by the Middle East Research and Informabon Proiect (MERIP), Inc., Suite 119, 1500 Massachuselts Ave., NW. ARTICLES 2 The Kurdish Experience Wastiin(jton, DC 20005. Second-class postage paid Amir Hassanpour at Washintjlori, DC POSTMASTER: send address changes to Middle East Report, 1500 Mass¬ 12 Mad Dreams of Independence: achusetts Ave , NW, Washmglon,DC 20005. Sub¬ The Kurds of Turkey scriptions are $25 per year lor individuals, $50 Chris Kutscliera lor institutions Overseas postage additional. Other rates on inside back cover. Middle East Report 16 City in the War Zone is available in microform from University Microfilms, Aliza Marcus 300 North Zeeb Rd., Ann Arbor, Ml 48106. Canadian Distribution: Doormouse Dis¬ 20 Kurdish Broadcasting in Iraq tribution, 65 Metcalfe St. 16, Toronto M4X,IR9. Ann Zimmerman Indexes and Abstracts: Abstracta Iranica, The Alternative Press Index, Index Islamicus, International 8 The Remains of Anfal Development Abstracts, International Political PHOTO ESSAY Science Abstracts, The Left Index, The Middle East Susan IVIeiselas and Andrew Whitley Journal, Mideast File, Migration & Ethnizitat, PAIS Bulletin, Political Science Abstracts, Universal Reference System. COLUMN 22 Washington Watch: Clinton, Ankara and Kurdish Human Rights Review Books and other items lor review should Maryam Elahi be sen! to: Joel Beinin, MERIP Review Editor, Dept. of History, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq's Secular Opposition
    IRAQ’S SECULAR OPPOSITION: THE RISE AND DECLINE OF AL-IRAQIYA Middle East Report N°127 – 31 July 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 A. A PERMANENT STATE OF CRISIS .................................................................................................. 2 B. A LOOMING SHOWDOWN ............................................................................................................. 3 II. IRAQIYA’S ORIGINS ..................................................................................................... 5 A. 1991-2005: THE ROAD TO BAGHDAD ........................................................................................... 5 B. 2005-2009: IRAQIYA’S CREATION, FALL AND REBIRTH ............................................................... 6 1. Retreat .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2. A new opening ............................................................................................................................. 8 III. AN ALLIANCE IN FLUX ................................................................................................ 9 A. MEMBERSHIP AND CONSTITUENCY ............................................................................................ 10 1. A
    [Show full text]
  • Iraqi Elections Ahead the SHI’A-SUNNI FACTOR
    LÄNDERBERICHT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. JORDANIEN DR. MARTIN BECK LUCIANE F. FANGALUA 1. März 2010 Iraqi Elections Ahead www.kas.de THE SHI’A-SUNNI FACTOR www.kas.de/jordanien For the third time since the downfall of politics rather than an advancement of more Saddam Hussein’s iron fist rule over Iraq, moderate political agendas. Indeed, al- national elections are to be held on March though the nominal head of the ISCI, it is 7, 2010. This basically positive finding still too early to say if Abdul Aziz’s son Am- should, however, not deter from the fact mar al-Hakim is truly in charge of his or- that the Iraqi system still faces a lot of ganization, or rather is in danger of becom- problems not only in terms of security but ing a puppet of ISCI party hard-liners. This also on the political realm. As became ob- might in the end weaken the traditional alli- vious during the campaign period, the ance between the Sunni Kurds and the Shi’a deep divisions between Shi’a and Sunni which is based on the historic decision of actors are still unsolved. Ayatollah Muhsin al-Hakim, the father of Abdul Aziz, to issue a religious decree in The death of Abdul Aziz al-Hakim—the head 1965 that forbade Iraqi Shi’a from partici- of the conservative US-backed Shi’a Islamic pating in the war against the Kurds.2 How- Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI), which is ever, in a January interview with Ammar al- under the umbrella of the Shi’a Iraqi Na- Hakim, it appears that support from Kurdish tional Alliance (INA)—who succumbed to President Massoud Barzani will continue.3 lung cancer in August 2009, left a vacuum in the Iraqi political scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq War? Current Situation and Issues for Congress
    Order Code RL31715 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq War? Current Situation and Issues for Congress Updated February 26, 2003 Raymond W. Copson (Coordinator) Specialist in International Relations Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Iraq War? Current Situation and Issues for Congress Summary On November 8, 2002, the United Nations Security Council, acting at U.S. urging, adopted Resolution 1441, giving Iraq a final opportunity to “comply with its the disarmament obligations” or “face serious consequences.” During January and February 2003, the U.S. military buildup in the Persian Gulf continued, and analysts speculated that mid-March seemed the most likely time for U.S. forces to launch a war. President Bush, other top U.S. officials, and British Prime Minister Tony Blair have repeatedly indicated that Iraq has little time left to offer full cooperation with U.N. weapons inspectors. However, leaders of France, Germany, Russia, and China, are urging that the inspections process be allowed more time. The Administration asserts that Iraq is in defiance of 17 Security Council resolutions requiring that it fully declare and eliminate its weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Skeptics, including many foreign critics, maintain that the Administration is exaggerating the Iraqi threat. In October 2002, Congress authorized the President to use the armed forces of the United States to defend U.S. national security against the threat posed by Iraq and to enforce all relevant U.N. resolutions regarding Iraq (P.L. 107-243). Some Members of Congress have expressed dissatisfaction with the level of Administration consultation on Iraq, and suggested that the Administration should provide more information on why Iraq poses an immediate threat requiring early military action.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq, August 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Iraq, August 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: IRAQ August 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Iraq (Al Jumhuriyah al Iraqiyah). Short Form: Iraq. Term for Citizen(s): Iraqi(s). Click to Enlarge Image Capital: Baghdad. Major Cities (in order of population size): Baghdad, Mosul (Al Mawsil), Basra (Al Basrah), Arbil (Irbil), Kirkuk, and Sulaymaniyah (As Sulaymaniyah). Independence: October 3, 1932, from the British administration established under a 1920 League of Nations mandate. Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1) and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein (April 9) are celebrated on fixed dates, although the latter has lacked public support since its declaration by the interim government in 2003. The following Muslim religious holidays occur on variable dates according to the Islamic lunar calendar, which is 11 days shorter than the Gregorian calendar: Eid al Adha (Feast of the Sacrifice), Islamic New Year, Ashoura (the Shia observance of the martyrdom of Hussein), Mouloud (the birth of Muhammad), Leilat al Meiraj (the ascension of Muhammad), and Eid al Fitr (the end of Ramadan). Flag: The flag of Iraq consists of three equal horizontal bands of red (top), white, and black with three green, five-pointed stars centered in the white band. The phrase “Allahu Akbar” (“God Is Great”) also appears in Arabic script in the white band with the word Allahu to the left of the center star and the word Akbar to the right of that star. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early History: Contemporary Iraq occupies territory that historians regard as the site of the earliest civilizations of the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq in Crisis
    Burke Chair in Strategy Iraq in Crisis By Anthony H. Cordesman and Sam Khazai January 6, 2014 Request for comments: This report is a draft that will be turned into an electronic book. Comments and suggested changes would be greatly appreciated. Please send any comments to Anthony H. Cordsman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy, at [email protected]. ANTHONY H. CORDESMAN Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Iraq in Crisis: Cordesman and Khazai AHC Final Review Draft 6.1.14 ii Acknowledgements This analysis was written with the assistance of Burke Chair researcher Daniel DeWit. Iraq in Crisis: Cordesman and Khazai AHC Final Review Draft 6.1.14 iii Executive Summary As events in late December 2013 and early 2014 have made brutally clear, Iraq is a nation in crisis bordering on civil war. It is burdened by a long history of war, internal power struggles, and failed governance. Is also a nation whose failed leadership is now creating a steady increase in the sectarian divisions between Shi’ite and Sunni, and the ethnic divisions between Arab and Kurd. Iraq suffers badly from the legacy of mistakes the US made during and after its invasion in 2003. It suffers from threat posed by the reemergence of violent Sunni extremist movements like Al Qaeda and equally violent Shi’ite militias. It suffers from pressure from Iran and near isolation by several key Arab states. It has increasingly become the victim of the forces unleashed by the Syrian civil war. Its main threats, however, are self-inflicted wounds caused by its political leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Politics, Governance, and Human Rights
    Iraq: Politics, Governance, and Human Rights Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs April 19, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21968 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Iraq: Politics, Governance, and Human Rights Summary Relations among major political factions have worsened substantially since late 2011, threatening Iraq’s stability and the perception of the achievements of the long U.S. intervention in Iraq. Sunni Arabs, always fearful that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki would seek unchallenged power for Shiite factions allied with him, accuse him of an outright power grab as he seeks to purge the highest-ranking Sunni Arabs from government and to cripple attempts by Sunni-inhabited provinces to achieve greater autonomy. Iraq’s Kurds have also become increasingly distrustful of Maliki over territorial, political, and economic issues, and have begun to similarly accuse him of authoritarian practices. The political crisis threatens to undo the relatively peaceful political competition and formation of cross-sectarian alliances that had emerged since 2007 after several years of sectarian conflict. Some Sunni insurgent groups apparently seek to undermine Maliki by conducting high-profile attacks intended to reignite sectarian conflict. The political rift has stalled the movement on national oil laws that had occurred during August- November 2011. The political crisis has also renewed outside criticism that Iraq’s factions lack focus on governance, or on improving key services, such as electricity. The splits and dysfunctions within Iraq’s government that have widened since mid-December 2011 have called into question the legacy of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ci V14 N3 18Dez2019.Indd
    Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 14, n. 3, 2019, p. 168-191 The United States influence in Iraq’s post-Saddam reconfiguration of power: The maintenance of instability besides structural changes1 A influência dos Estados Unidos na reconfiguração de poder do Iraque pós-Saddam: A manutenção de instabilidade apesar das mudanças estruturais DOI: 10.21530/ci.v14n3.2019.903 Rodrigo Augusto Duarte Amaral2 Abstract In 2003, the United States of America started a reconfiguration process of Iraq’s political-economic structure. After the overthrown of Saddam Hussein, the United Nation Security Council stated that an international coalition should act in Iraq as a Provisional Authority which was led by the USA, whose responsibility was to rebuilding Iraq (Resolution 1483). For 14 months, the USA formally governed and reformed Iraq’s structure, declaring that its objective was to develop a “new Iraq”. The 2005 constitution marked the consolidation of this new political regime, transforming Iraq in a federal and democratic country as aimed by the USA agenda. But how this new framework of statebuilding worked out for Iraq? Despite the effort, almost fifteen years after the USA formal occupation, Iraq remained politically unstable. The maintenance of insurgent groups against international interference, the rise of Islamic State, the resumption of Iraq Kurdistan interest for independence are some examples of today’s political crisis in Iraq. This paper aims to present how USA executed the reformulation of Iraqi political structure since 2003: changing the political regime, prohibiting any Baath affiliation and action in Iraq’s political theater, and articulating the rise of political parties that historically opposed Baath’s government for almost 40 years.
    [Show full text]