DOCSLIB.ORG

Marine Microbial Ecology MEES498/684

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marine Microbial Ecology MEES498/684 Marine Microbial Ecology MEES498/684 Course is taught at the Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, or the Horns Point Laboratory. Course will also be broadcasted via the Interactive Video Network. Course Instructors: Dr. Feng Chen, IMET, Room 4047. Ph: 410 234 8866. E-mail [email protected] Dr. Sairah Malkin, HPL, AREL Room 134. Ph: 410 221 8418. E-mail: [email protected] Course Description: To become familiar with the diversity, ecology, and biogeochemical roles of Bacteria, Archaea, microbial Eukaryotes, viruses, and fungi in the marine environment. The course will also cover the latest discoveries in molecular microbial ecology. Each main topic will begin with a lecture and will be followed by a paper discussion. For the paper discussions, each student will present selected papers specified in the syllabus (or by consensus with the course instructors). Students will also participate in class discussions. Class Schedule: Classes are taught over IVN and are held at 10-11:30 Tuesday and Thursday in IMET 2041 or HPL Coastal Classroom. Dates for student presentations and assignments are given in the syllabus Expected Learning Outcomes: 1. Students will become familiar with marine microorganisms, their biogeochemical activities and energetic constraints, and their ecological roles in marine environments through lectures and from reading and discussion of primary scientific literature and published reviews. 2. Students will be introduced to widely used techniques in marine microbiology through 2 hands-on laboratory sessions focusing on (1) visualizing marine microbial communities and (2) using gene sequence data to infer microbial phylogeny and ecophysiology. 3. Students will demonstrate mastery of course material by leading class discussions of primary literature, participation in class discussions, through preparation of a formal synthesis paper in which a single topic is covered in depth, and two exams. Every opportunity will be provided for all students to actively participate in the discussion and students are strongly encouraged to comment on strengths and weaknesses of the papers discussed in this class. 1 Grading: Class participation 10% Paper presentations 20% Term paper 30% Exam I 20% Exam II 20% Paper Presentation: Each week, a student will present a seminar on one or two papers on a related topic. Paper assignments will be determined in the first week of class (papers are listed in course reading material below). The presentation will include a general introduction to the topic covered, a detailed explanation of the methods employed in the paper, detailed examination of the results described in the papers, discussion of the significance of the work, and a critique of the strengths and weaknesses of the papers. The presenting student should cover background material and additional details of methods by doing supplementary reading as necessary. All students are expected to read all discussion papers and to participate in class discussion on the topic. Term paper: Identify and review an open debate or controversy relevant to marine microbiology (maximum 1500 words, excluding references). The topic should be chosen by the student in discussion with a course instructor. (e.g., (1) What is the source of the surface ocean methane maximum? (2) Is the marine nitrogen cycle in balance?) At least 5 papers related to the topic (in addition to the two papers already covered in the class) should be carefully read and synthesized. Students should consider what is exciting and novel about the research and make clear how the papers advance our understanding of the topic. We are looking for an integrated understanding of the topic, rather than a summary of five individual papers. Your review should also identify what important questions still need to be answered. There will be three steps in the development of your term paper. The topic should be identified during the first month of class, by Mar 1, 2018, in discussion with a course instructor. By Mar 15, 2018, an annotated bibliography will be submitted to the course instructor. The bibliography will present 5 key references, and a short paragraph (4-5 sentences) describing the content of the reference. The final paper is due 19 April, 2018. The term paper is mandatory, and must be completed at the scheduled time, subject to standard university guidelines. Makeup assignments as allowed by the University must be requested (in writing) within one week of the missed assignment. Course Evaluation At the end of the course, students are strongly encouraged to complete the on-line process facilitated by the MEES Graduate Program to provide anonymous feedback to the instructors on our course. This feedback is extremely valuable for planning and preparing future classes. Time will be allocated at the end of the course for a general discussion led by students for improving the course in future years. 2 Course Schedule (at a glance) Week Topic Date Reading Activities/Due Dates 1 Course Introduction Th Jan 25 Introduction to marine microbial Tu Jan 30 Background 2 ecology Th Feb 1 Lab activities at IMET Protists, dinoflagellates and Tu Feb 6 Background 3 phytoplankton Th Feb 8 Discussion papers Photosynthetic and phototrophic Tu Feb 13 Background 4 bacteria Th Feb 15 Discussion papers Heterotrophic bacteria, archaea, and Tu Feb 20 Background 5 important groups of bacteria Tu Feb 22 Discussion papers Marine viruses and their ecological Tu Feb 27 Background 6 role Th Mar 1 Discussion papers Term Paper topics selected Tu Mar 6 Background Diversity and function of microbes, 7 Hands on lab (IMET); molecular tools Th Mar 8 Annotated bibliography due Genomics and environmental Tu Mar 13 Background reading First exam; take-home 8 genomics Th Mar 15 Discussion papers 9 spring break – Mar 18-25 Marine N cycle – aerobic processes Tu Mar 27 Background 10 (N-fixation, nitrification) Th Mar 29 Discussion papers Marine N cycle – anaerobic processes Tu Apr 3 Background 11 (denitrification, anammox, DNRA) Th Apr 5 Discussion papers Metal oxide respiration (Fe, Mn, Tu Apr 10 Background 12 electrodes) and Iron Cycling Th Apr 12 Discussion papers Marine S cycle – Sulfate reduction, S Tu Apr 17 Background reading 13 oxidation, disproportionation Th Apr 19 Discussion papers Term Papers due Marine CH cycle – methanogenesis, Tu Apr 24 Background reading 14 4 aerobic and anaerobic oxidation Th Apr 26 Discussion papers Biofilms, Life on particles, Tu May 1 Background reading 15 phytoplankton-bacterial interactions Th May 3 Discussion papers Final exam (non- Hydrocarbon oxidation (aerobic Tu May 8 Background reading 16 cumulative; take home) and anaerobic) Th May 10 Discussion papers 3 Topics and Reading List Course 1st half (Chen) Weeks 1 and 2: Introduction to marine microbial ecology Topics: history of microbial ecology, great plate count anomaly, types of microbes; microbial loop. Required background reading: Kirchman 2008. Introduction and overview (Chapter 1, Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, ed. David Kirchman 2008). Sherr and Sherr 2008. Understanding roles of microbes in marine pelagic food webs: a brief history (Chapter 2, Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, ed. David Kirchman 2008); Fenchel T (2008); The microbial loop – 25 years later. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 366: 99–103 2nd class, hands-on practice, meet in person at IMET Sample collection, filtration, nucleic acid staining of microbes, epifluorescent microscopy, visualization and enumeration of microbes, image processing Week 3: Protists, dinoflagellates and phytoplankton Topics: Protist grazing, phytoplankton, harmful algal blooms, picoeukaryotes Required background reading: Jurgens and Massana 2008. Protisan grazing on marine bacterioplankton (Chapter 11, Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, ed. David Kirchman 2008). Worden and Not. 2008. Ecology and diversity of picoeukaryotes (Chapter 6, Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, ed. David Kirchman 2008). Hallegraeff 2003. Harmful algal blooms: a global overview, pp. 25–49. In: Hallegraeff, G. M., Anderson, D. M., Cembella, A. D.; Enevoldsen, H.O. (ed.) Manual on Harmful Marine Microalgae. UMESCO. Discussion papers: (1) Caron et al. 2017. Probing the evolution, ecology and physiology of marine protists using transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15:6-20. (long paper) (2) Banguera-Hinestroza et al. 2016. Seasonality and toxin production of Pyrodinium bahamense in a Red Sea lagoon. Harmful Algae 55: 163–171 Week 4: Photosynthetic and phototrophic bacteria Topics: cyanobacteria, picocyanobacteria, AAnP and proteorhodopsin-containing prokaryotes. Required background reading: Beja and Suzuki, 2008. Photoheterotrophic marine prokaryotes (Chapter 5, Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, ed. David Kirchman 2008). Discussion papers: (1) Yelton et al. 2016. Global genetic capacity for mixotrophy in marine picocyanobacteria. ISME Journal 10: 2946-2957 (2) Ferrera. et al. 2017. Light enhances the growth rates of natural populations of aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. ISME Journal doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.79 (Short communication) 4 Week 5: Heterotrophic bacteria, archaea, and important groups of bacteria Topics: Classically culturable bacteria, sea water culturable bacteria, not yet culturable bacteria, marine archaea. Required background reading: Fuhrman and Hagstrom 2008. Bacterial and archaeal community structure and its patterns (Chapter 3, Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, ed. David Kirchman 2008) Discussion paper: (1) Gionannoni et al. 2017. SAR11 bacteria: the most abundant plankton
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taurine Is a Major Carbon and Energy Source for Marine Prokaryotes in the North Atlantic Ocean Off the Iberian Peninsula
    Microbial Ecology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-019-01320-y MICROBIOLOGY OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS Taurine Is a Major Carbon and Energy Source for Marine Prokaryotes in the North Atlantic Ocean off the Iberian Peninsula Elisabeth L. Clifford1 & Marta M. Varela2 & Daniele De Corte3 & Antonio Bode2 & Victor Ortiz1 & Gerhard J. Herndl1,4 & Eva Sintes1,5 Received: 28 June 2018 /Accepted: 3 January 2019 # The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Taurine, an amino acid-like compound, acts as an osmostress protectant in many marine metazoans and algae and is released via various processes into the oceanic dissolved organic matter pool. Taurine transporters are widespread among members of the marine prokaryotic community, tentatively indicating that taurine might be an important substrate for prokaryotes in the ocean. In this study, we determined prokaryotic taurine assimilation and respiration throughout the water column along two transects in the North Atlantic off the Iberian Peninsula. Taurine assimilation efficiency decreased from the epipelagic waters from 55 ± 14% to 27 ± 20% in the bathypelagic layers (means of both transects). Members of the ubiquitous alphaproteobacterial SAR11 clade accounted for a large fraction of cells taking up taurine, especially in surface waters. Archaea (Thaumarchaeota + Euryarchaeota) were also able to take up taurine in the upper water column, but to a lower extent than Bacteria. The contribution of taurine assimilation to the heterotrophic prokaryotic carbon biomass production ranged from 21% in the epipelagic layer to 16% in the bathypelagic layer. Hence, we conclude that dissolved free taurine is a significant carbon and energy source for prokaryotes throughout the oceanic water column being utilized with similar efficiencies as dissolved free amino acids.
    [Show full text]
  • Specificity Re-Evaluation of Oligonucleotide Probes for the Detection of Marine Picoplankton by Tyramide Signal Amplification-Fl
    fmicb-08-00854 May 24, 2017 Time: 20:18 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 29 May 2017 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00854 Specificity Re-evaluation of Oligonucleotide Probes for the Detection of Marine Picoplankton by Tyramide Signal Amplification-Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Virginie Riou, Marine Périot and Isabelle C. Biegala* Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography – Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Aix Marseille Université – Université de Toulon, Marseille, France Edited by: Sophie Rabouille, Oligonucleotide probes are increasingly being used to characterize natural microbial Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France assemblages by Tyramide Signal Amplification-Fluorescent in situ Hybridization (TSA- Reviewed by: FISH, or CAtalysed Reporter Deposition CARD-FISH). In view of the fast-growing rRNA Fernanda De Avila Abreu, databases, we re-evaluated the in silico specificity of eleven bacterial and eukaryotic Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil probes and competitor frequently used for the quantification of marine picoplankton. Tom Bibby, We performed tests on cell cultures to decrease the risk for non-specific hybridization, University of Southampton, before they are used on environmental samples. The probes were confronted to recent United Kingdom databases and hybridization conditions were tested against target strains matching *Correspondence: Isabelle C. Biegala perfectly with the probes, and against the closest non-target strains presenting one [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeal Distribution and Abundance in Water Masses of the Arctic Ocean, Pacific Sector
    Vol. 69: 101–112, 2013 AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Published online April 30 doi: 10.3354/ame01624 Aquat Microb Ecol FREEREE ACCESSCCESS Archaeal distribution and abundance in water masses of the Arctic Ocean, Pacific sector Chie Amano-Sato1, Shohei Akiyama1, Masao Uchida2, Koji Shimada3, Motoo Utsumi1,* 1University of Tsukuba, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan 2National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan 3Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8477, Japan ABSTRACT: Marine planktonic Archaea have been recently recognized as an ecologically impor- tant component of marine prokaryotic biomass in the world’s oceans. Their abundance and meta- bolism are closely connected with marine geochemical cycling. We evaluated the distribution of planktonic Archaea in the Pacific sector of the Arctic Ocean using fluorescence in situ hybridiza- tion (FISH) with catalyzed reporter deposition (CARD-FISH) and performed statistical analyses using data for archaeal abundance and geochemical variables. The relative abundance of Thaum - archaeota generally increased with depth, and euryarchaeal abundance was the lowest of all planktonic prokaryotes. Multiple regression analysis showed that the thaumarchaeal relative abundance was negatively correlated with ammonium and dissolved oxygen concentrations and chlorophyll fluorescence. Canonical correspondence analysis showed that archaeal distributions differed with oceanographic water masses; in particular, Thaumarchaeota were abundant from the halocline layer to deep water, where salinity was higher and most nutrients were depleted. However, at several stations on the East Siberian Sea side of the study area and along the North- wind Ridge, Thaumarchaeota and Bacteria were proportionally very abundant at the bottom in association with higher nutrient conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Oceans of Archaea Abundant Oceanic Crenarchaeota Appear to Derive from Thermophilic Ancestors That Invaded Low-Temperature Marine Environments
    Oceans of Archaea Abundant oceanic Crenarchaeota appear to derive from thermophilic ancestors that invaded low-temperature marine environments Edward F. DeLong arth’s microbiota is remarkably per- karyotes), Archaea, and Bacteria. Although al- vasive, thriving at extremely high ternative taxonomic schemes have been recently temperature, low and high pH, high proposed, whole-genome and other analyses E salinity, and low water availability. tend to support Woese’s three-domain concept. One lineage of microbial life in par- Well-known and cultivated archaea generally ticular, the Archaea, is especially adept at ex- fall into several major phenotypic groupings: ploiting environmental extremes. Despite their these include extreme halophiles, methanogens, success in these challenging habitats, the Ar- and extreme thermophiles and thermoacido- chaea may now also be viewed as a philes. Early on, extremely halo- cosmopolitan lot. These microbes philic archaea (haloarchaea) were exist in a wide variety of terres- first noticed as bright-red colonies trial, freshwater, and marine habi- Archaea exist in growing on salted fish or hides. tats, sometimes in very high abun- a wide variety For many years, halophilic isolates dance. The oceanic Marine Group of terrestrial, from salterns, salt deposits, and I Crenarchaeota, for example, ri- freshwater, and landlocked seas provided excellent val total bacterial biomass in wa- marine habitats, model systems for studying adap- ters below 100 m. These wide- tations to high salinity. It was only spread Archaea appear to derive sometimes in much later, however, that it was from thermophilic ancestors that very high realized that these salt-loving invaded diverse low-temperature abundance “bacteria” are actually members environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Warming Effects on Prokaryotic Growth and Viral Production in Coastal Waters of the Northwest Pacific During the Cold Season
    diversity Brief Report Experimental Warming Effects on Prokaryotic Growth and Viral Production in Coastal Waters of the Northwest Pacific during the Cold Season An-Yi Tsai 1,2,*, Gwo-Ching Gong 1,2 and Vladimir Mukhanov 3 1 Institute of Marine Environment and Ecology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202-24, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 Center of Excellence for the Oceans, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202-24, Taiwan 3 A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, Russian Academy of Sciences, 299011 Sevastopol, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-2-2462-2192 (ext. 5705); Fax: +886-2-2462-0892 Abstract: Climate warming can directly affect biological processes in marine environments. Here, we investigated if warming (+2 ◦C) can change dynamics in viral and prokaryotic populations in the cold seasons in natural seawaters. We monitored the changes in viral production and prokaryotic growth rate. The prokaryotic average gross growth rates were 0.08 and 0.34 h−1 in November and 0.06 and 0.41 h−1 in December in the in situ and warming experiments, respectively. We found that warming water temperature resulted in a significant increase in prokaryotic growth rates. In warming experiments, the overall viral production rate was about 0.77–14.4 × 105 viruses mL−1 h−1, and a rough estimate of prokaryotic mortality was about 5.6–6.8 × 104 cells mL−1 h−1. Based on our estimation, burst sizes of about 21 and 14 viruses prokaryotes−1 were measured under the Citation: Tsai, A.-Y.; Gong, G.-C.; experimental warming period.
    [Show full text]
  • Cobalamin Cobalamin in Which Adenine Substitutes for DMB As the Α Ligand
    Two distinct pools of B12 analogs reveal community interdependencies in the ocean Katherine R. Heala, Wei Qinb, Francois Ribaleta, Anthony D. Bertagnollib,1, Willow Coyote-Maestasa,2, Laura R. Hmeloa, James W. Moffettc,d, Allan H. Devola, E. Virginia Armbrusta, David A. Stahlb, and Anitra E. Ingallsa,3 aSchool of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; bDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; cDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0894; and dDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0894 Edited by David M. Karl, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, and approved November 28, 2016 (received for review May 25, 2016) Organisms within all domains of life require the cofactor cobalamin cobalamin in which adenine substitutes for DMB as the α ligand (vitamin B12), which is produced only by a subset of bacteria and (12) (Fig. 1). Production of pseudocobalamin in a natural marine archaea. On the basis of genomic analyses, cobalamin biosynthesis environment has not been shown, nor have reasons for the pro- in marine systems has been inferred in three main groups: select duction of this compound in place of cobalamin been elucidated. heterotrophic Proteobacteria, chemoautotrophic Thaumarchaeota, To explore the pervasiveness of cobalamin and pseudocobala- and photoautotrophic Cyanobacteria. Culture work demonstrates min supply and demand in marine systems, we determined the that many Cyanobacteria do not synthesize cobalamin but rather standing stocks of these compounds in microbial communities produce pseudocobalamin, challenging the connection between the from surface waters across the North Pacific Ocean using liquid occurrence of cobalamin biosynthesis genes and production of the chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS).
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Ecology of the Oceans David L. Kirchman (Editor)
    Microbial Ecology of the Oceans David L. Kirchman (Editor) John Wiley & Sons, August 2000, ISBN 0471299928 552 pages Microbial ecology is now recognized to be fundamental for understanding the natural world around us and is essential for examining life in the oceans. For the first time, this book brings together international experts to explore the incredibly diverse collection of microbes (and viruses) found in the oceans and to dissect many of the processes mediated by these microbes in aquatic environments. Although the oceans are emphasized, the organisms and processes discussed in the book occur in nearly all natural environments, including rivers and lakes. « Microbial Ecology of the Oceans » reviews some basics of marine microbiology and provides a foundation for researchers and students new to the field while also examining several questions currently being discussed in modern microbial ecology. The book brings together concepts from autoecological studies of individual bacterial groups and from ecological studies of microbial assemblages in the oceans. In addition to drawing on the rich history of microbiology, Microbial Ecology of the Oceans uses the latest advances in biological and chemical oceanography and limnology to examine the role of marine microbes and viruses in the oceans. « Microbial Ecology of the Oceans » elucidates the role of microbes in food web dynamics and biogeochemical cycles in the ocean. It will prove to be an indispensable resource for students and researchers in biological and chemical oceanography, geochemistry, marine chemistry, freshwater ecology, and microbiology. Some of the topics covered by this informative book include: * Microbial evolution, as revealed by molecular techniques * Microbes in carbon budgets and cycles * Viruses and grazers of bacteria * Competition between bacteria and phytoplankton for limited nutrients * Marine symbiosis Introduction (D.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Dynamics and Co-Occurrence Among Marine Phytoplankton, Bacteria and Myoviruses Shows Microdiversity Matters
    The ISME Journal (2017) 11, 1614–1629 © 2017 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/17 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Ecological dynamics and co-occurrence among marine phytoplankton, bacteria and myoviruses shows microdiversity matters David M Needham, Rohan Sachdeva and Jed A Fuhrman Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Numerous ecological processes, such as bacteriophage infection and phytoplankton–bacterial interactions, often occur via strain-specific mechanisms. Therefore, studying the causes of microbial dynamics should benefit from highly resolving taxonomic characterizations. We sampled daily to weekly over 5 months following a phytoplankton bloom off Southern California and examined the extent of microdiversity, that is, significant variation within 99% sequence similarity clusters, operational taxonomic units (OTUs), of bacteria, archaea, phytoplankton chloroplasts (all via 16S or intergenic spacer (ITS) sequences) and T4-like-myoviruses (via g23 major capsid protein gene sequence). The extent of microdiversity varied between genes (ITS most, g23 least) and only temporally common taxa were highly microdiverse. Overall, 60% of taxa exhibited microdiversity; 59% of these had subtypes that changed significantly as a proportion of the parent taxon, indicating ecologically distinct taxa. Pairwise correlations between prokaryotes and myoviruses or phytoplank- ton (for example, highly microdiverse Chrysochromulina sp.) improved when using single-base variants. Correlations between myoviruses and SAR11 increased in number (172 vs 9, Spear- man40.65) and became stronger (0.61 vs 0.58, t-test: Po0.001) when using SAR11 ITS single-base variants vs OTUs. Whole-community correlation between SAR11 and myoviruses was much improved when using ITS single-base variants vs OTUs, with Mantel rho = 0.49 vs 0.27; these results are consistent with strain-specific interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biomass Distribution on Earth
    The biomass distribution on Earth Y. M. Bar-On, R. Phillips, R. Milo Supplementary Information Appendix Contents Overview ......................................................................................................................... 3 Plants ............................................................................................................................... 4 Biomass ....................................................................................................................... 4 Biomass of roots and leaves ........................................................................................ 6 Comparison of plant and bacterial biomass ................................................................ 7 Bacteria and Archaea (Prokaryotes) ............................................................................... 7 Marine ......................................................................................................................... 8 Soil ............................................................................................................................ 11 Marine deep subsurface sediment ............................................................................. 13 Terrestrial deep subsurface ....................................................................................... 18 Fungi ............................................................................................................................. 22 Soil fungi ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Marine Microbiology
    J. Molec. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (1999) 1(1): 3-4. JMMBMarine Symposium Microbiology 3 Molecular Marine Microbiology Douglas H. Bartlett* describes the bacterial manufacturing of magnetic iron containing organelles (magnetosomes) within certain Center for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine benthic bacteria and their biotechnological promise in Scripps Institution of Oceanography products ranging from magnetic tapes to magnetic University of California, San Diego resonance imaging devices. La Jolla, CA 92093-0202, USA Two articles deal with mysterious motility mechanisms operating in marine microbes. Linda McCarter introduces surface-regulated phenomena, including swarming motility The following thirteen minireviews introduce some of the via lateral flagella, in the human pathogen and marine exciting milestones being covered in molecular marine resident, V. parahaemolyticus. Bianca Brahamsha details microbiology today, and in many cases, their biomedical the only known case of liquid motility in the absence of or biotechnological relevance. The issues covered include flagella, a phenotype displayed by many marine quorum and anti-quorum sensing, selected symbioses, Synechococcus species. DNA shuffling in the environment, the evolution and devel- The minireviews end with descriptions of the opment of novel motility mechanisms, hydrocarbon deg- adaptations of certain deep-sea prokaryotes to extremes radation, the interactions of microbes with metals, and of pressure and temperature. Kato and Qureshi present a adaptations to extremes of pressure and temperature. Al- taxomonic overview of deep-sea bacteria and genetic and though most of these topics are not exclusive to marine biophysical analyses of respiratory chain adaptations to realms, they all have as a common thread a profound rel- elevated pressure. My article describes genetic evidence evance to the ocean environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Prokaryotic Growth and Nutrition
    37623_CH05_137_160.pdf 11/11/06 7:23 AM Page 137 © Jones and Bartlett Publishers. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION 5 Chapter Preview and Key Concepts 5.1 Prokaryotic Reproduction Prokaryotic • Binary fission produces genetically-identical daughter cells. • Prokaryotes vary in their generation times. Growth and 5.2 Prokaryotic Growth • Bacterial population growth goes through four phases. • Endospores are dormant structures to endure Nutrition times of nutrient stress. • Growth of prokaryotic populations is sensitive to temperature, oxygen gas, and pH. But who shall dwell in these worlds if they be inhabited? . Are we or 5.3 Culture Media and Growth Measurements • Culture media contain the nutrients needed for they Lords of the World? . optimal prokaryotic growth. —Johannes Kepler (quoted in The Anatomy of Melancholy) • Special chemical formulations can be devised to isolate and identify some prokaryotes. MicroInquiry 5: Identification of Bacterial Species Books have been written about it; movies have been made; even a • Two standard methods are available to produce radio play in 1938 about it frightened thousands of Americans. What pure cultures. is it? Martian life. In 1877 the Italian astronomer, Giovanni Schiapar- • Prokaryotic growth can be measured by direct elli, saw lines on Mars, which he and others assumed were canals built and indirect methods. by intelligent beings. It wasn’t until well into the 20th century that this notion was disproved. Still, when we gaze at the red planet, we won- der: Did life ever exist there? We are not the only ones wondering. Astronomers, geologists, and many other scientists have asked the same question. Today microbiol- ogists have joined their comrades, wondering if microbial life once existed on the Red Planet or, for that matter, elsewhere in our Solar System.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Microbial Carbon Sequestration in the Ocean – Future Research Directions
    Biogeosciences, 11, 5285–5306, 2014 www.biogeosciences.net/11/5285/2014/ doi:10.5194/bg-11-5285-2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Mechanisms of microbial carbon sequestration in the ocean – future research directions N. Jiao1, C. Robinson2, F. Azam3, H. Thomas4, F. Baltar5, H. Dang1, N. J. Hardman-Mountford6, M. Johnson2, D. L. Kirchman7, B. P. Koch8, L. Legendre9,10, C. Li11, J. Liu1, T. Luo1, Y.-W. Luo1, A. Mitra12, A. Romanou13, K. Tang1, X. Wang14, C. Zhang15, and R. Zhang1 1State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China 2School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK 3Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD, La Jolla, CA 920193, USA 4Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada 5Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand 6CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Floreat, WA 6014, Australia 7School of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, DE 19958, USA 8Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany 9Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, UMR7093, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche, 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France 10CNRS, UMR7093, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche, 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France 11Chinese University of Geology, Wuhan, China 12Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Research, Swansea University, Swansea, UK 13Dept. of Applied Physics and Applied Math., Columbia University and NASA-Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY 10025, USA 14South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China 15Tongji University, Shanghai, China Correspondence to: N.
    [Show full text]