Chapter 9 Ecology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 9 Ecology TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure) (England and Wales) Rules 2006 THE NETWORK RAIL (EAST WEST RAIL WESTERN SECTION PHASE 2) ORDER DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT CHAPTER 9: ECOLOGY 133735-PBR-REP-EEN- Document Reference 000009 Author Network Rail Date June 2017 Date of revision and revision June 2017 number 2.0 The Network Rail (East West Rail Western Section Phase 2) Order Draft Environmental Statement CONTENTS 9. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 9.1 General .......................................................................................................... 2 9.2 Limitations and Assumptions ......................................................................... 3 9.3 Legislation, Policy and Guidance ................................................................... 3 9.4 Approach and Methodology ........................................................................... 6 9.5 Baseline ....................................................................................................... 23 9.6 Effects ....................................................................................................... 197 9.7 Mitigation ................................................................................................... 325 9.8 Residual Effects ......................................................................................... 376 9.9 Species Scientific Name Glossary ............................................................. 377 LIST OF TABLES Table 9.1 Summary of Ecological Field Surveys and Corresponding Technical Appendices .............................................................................................................. 10 Table 9.2 Ecology Study Areas ................................................................................ 13 Table 9.3 Species and aquatic feature baseline information for the Cherwell District Council sub-section .................................................................................................. 31 Table 9.4 Species and aquatic feature baseline information for the Aylesbury Vale: Claydon/Quainton sub-section ................................................................................. 53 Table 9.5 Species and aquatic feature baseline information for the Aylesbury Vale: Winslow/Swanbourne sub-section............................................................................ 82 Table 9.6 Species and aquatic feature baseline information for Aylesbury Vale: Aylesbury sub-section ............................................................................................ 108 Table 9.7 Species and aquatic feature baseline information for Wycombe District Council sub-section ................................................................................................ 128 The Network Rail (East West Rail Western Section Phase 2) Order Draft Environmental Statement Table 9.8 Species and aquatic feature baseline information for Milton Keynes Council sub-section ................................................................................................ 142 Table 9.9 Species and aquatic feature baseline information for Central Bedfordshire Council sub-section ................................................................................................ 161 Table 9.10 Species and aquatic feature baseline information for Bedford Borough Council sub-section ................................................................................................ 180 Table 9.11 Developments that will affect the character and importance of ecological resources prior to construction of the Project ......................................................... 193 Table 9.12 Species Scientific Name Glossary ........................................................ 377 The Network Rail (East West Rail Western Section Phase 2) Order Draft Environmental Statement 9. INTRODUCTION Summary Baseline The majority of the Project Area is an active railway surrounded by agricultural, and to a lesser degree, residential land uses. A section of the Project Area between approximately Claydon Junction and Bletchley is a disused railway which has been colonised by semi- natural grassland, scrub and small areas of woodland. There are a large number of designated site, habitat and species ecological features in the Project Area or in close proximity to the Project Boundary. Of particular note are the following ecological features: Sheephouse Wood SSSI; A number of non-statutory Local Wildlife Sites which are designated for unimproved neutral or calcareous grassland; Mosaics of grassland, scrub and ruderal/empheral habitats which are present along the disused railway and in several former industrial sites near Bletchley; A number of watercourses which provide habitat for aquatic invertebrates, fish and plants; Populations of bats including Bechstein’s bat in the Calvert area and populations of Daubenton’s bat, Natterer’s bat and brown long- eared bat which use the disused railway as a key commuting path; Barn owl and populations of Birds of Conservation Concern red list species; Populations of great crested newt and reptiles; and Populations of terrestrial invertebrate and black hairstreak butterfly. Effects Without mitigation, there would be a range of significant adverse construction effects on ecological features. These are mainly associated with: The loss of breeding/foraging/sheltering or growing habitat; Construction phase disturbance; Alterations to small sections of watercourse; and Mortality to bat and barn owl associated with collisions with train/air pressure changes during train operation. Volume 2 Chapter 9 Page 1 The Network Rail (East West Rail Western Section Phase 2) Order Draft Environmental Statement Mitigation A range of ecological mitigation measures have been proposed to address significant adverse ecological impacts. These include: Creation of compensatory grassland, scrub and wetland habitat outside of the Project Area; Creation of compensatory grassland and scrub habitat in the Project Area after construction has been complete (on new embankment and cutting slopes); Measures to address construction disturbance to animal species (e.g. controlled working practices and lighting controls); and Provision of replacement barn owl nesting habitat (nest boxes). The requirement for a bat mitigation structure is being considered following provisional assessment of potential impacts on Sheephouse Wood SSSI. The results of further operational impact assessment on bats and consultation with NE will be presented in the Final ES. Residual Effects All significant construction effects will be fully mitigated. No construction phase significant residual adverse effects are anticipated. 9.1 General 9.1.1 This chapter identifies and assesses the likely significant effects of the Project on ecological features that could arise from construction and operation. These include impacts on species, habitats and designated sites for nature conservation. This chapter also sets out agreed avoidance, mitigation, compensation and enhancement measures where appropriate, and assesses the significance of the residual effects of the Project on these features. 9.1.2 Species scientific names have been removed from the main body of this chapter (wherever a widely accepted species common name exists) and are provided instead in Section 9.9. Volume 2 Chapter 9 Page 2 The Network Rail (East West Rail Western Section Phase 2) Order Draft Environmental Statement 9.2 Limitations and Assumptions 9.2.1 In addition to the overall ES limitations explained in Section 4.11 of Chapter 4: EIA Methodology, the following limitations and assumptions apply to this chapter. Field Surveys 9.2.2 The limitations, constraints and any deviations from good construction practice survey methodologies associated with particular survey types are reported in Technical Appendices 9.2 to 9.16. 9.2.3 Access was not provided to all of the land area where ecological surveys were planned. Information on locations where access was restricted is provided in Technical Appendices 9.2 to 9.16. 9.2.4 Where land access was not available and field survey data therefore not obtained, a precautionary baseline was built up according to the approach outlined in Section 9.4 (Approach and Methodology). This constitutes a ‘reasonable precautionary case’ basis for the subsequent assessment. Assessment of Impacts 9.2.5 Unless otherwise stated, the assessment of ecological impacts was undertaken using the general assumption that all vegetation will be removed from the TWAO Scheme Area in a single season in order to construct the Project. 9.3 Legislation, Policy and Guidance 9.3.1 The following key pieces of nature conservation legislation are relevant to this assessment: Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and Wild Fauna and Flora (the Habitats Directive); The Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (the Bern Convention); The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended) (the Habitats Regulations); The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) (WCA); The Countryside and Rights of Way (CRoW) Act 2000; Volume 2 Chapter 9 Page 3 The Network Rail (East West Rail Western Section Phase 2) Order Draft Environmental Statement The Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act 2006; The Protection of Badgers Act 1992;and
Recommended publications
  • An Evaluation of Latent Dirichlet Allocation in the Context of Plant-Pollinator Networks by Liam Callaghan a Thesis Presented To
    An evaluation of latent Dirichlet allocation in the context of plant-pollinator networks by Liam Callaghan A Thesis Presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mathematics and Statistics Guelph, Ontario, Canada c Liam Callaghan, December, 2012 ABSTRACT An evaluation of latent Dirichlet allocation in the context of plant-pollinator networks Liam Callaghan Advisors: University of Guelph, 2012 Dr. A. Ali Dr. G. Umphrey There may be several mechanisms that drive observed interactions between plants and pollinators in an ecosystem, many of which may involve trait matching or trait complementarity. Hence a model of insect species activity on plant species should be represented as a mixture of these linkage rules. Unfortunately, ecologists do not always know how many, or even which, traits are the main contributors to the observed interactions. This thesis proposes the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model from artificial intelligence for modelling the observed interactions in an ecosys- tem as a finite mixture of (latent) interaction groups in which plant and pollinator pairs that share common linkage rules are placed in the same interaction group. Sev- eral model selection criteria are explored for estimating how many interaction groups best describe the observed interactions. This thesis also introduces a new model se- lection score called \penalized perplexity". The performance of the model selection criteria, and of LDA in general, are evaluated through a comprehensive simulation study that consider networks of various size along with varying levels of nesting and numbers of interaction groups. Results of the simulation study suggest that LDA works well on networks with mild-to-no nesting, but loses accuracy with increased nestedness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Brown Bear Ursus Arctos As Seed Disperser: a Case Study with the Bilberry Vaccinium Myrtillus
    The role of the brown bear Ursus arctos as seed disperser: a case study with the bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus Rola niedźwiedzia brunatnego Ursus arctos w rozprzestrzenianiu nasion: studium przypadku na przykładzie borówki czarnej Vaccinium myrtillus PhD thesis Alberto García-Rodríguez Kraków, 2021 To the memory of José Ignacio and Javier Rodríguez Val Female brown bear with two cubs of the year feeding on bilberry fruits in Tatra National Park (July 2020) “They thought they were burying you, they did not know they were burying a seed” Ernesto Cardenal, Nicaraguan priest, poet and politician PhD CANDIDATE mgr. ALBERTO GARCÍA-RODRÍGUEZ Institute of Nature Conservation of the Polish Academy of Sciences Al. Adama Mickiewicza 33, 31-120, Krakow, Poland SUPERVISOR dr. hab. NURIA SELVA FERNÁNDEZ Institute of Nature Conservation of the Polish Academy of Sciences Al. Adama Mickiewicza 33, 31-120, Krakow, Poland CO-SUPERVISOR dr. JÖRG ALBRECHT Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F) Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. The PhD thesis was prepared during doctoral studies in the Doctoral Study of Natural Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Kraków. CONTENTS SUMMARY…………..……………..…………………………...………………………………………………...5 STRESZCZENIE……...………….……………………………………………………………………………….8 INTRODUCTION……………………...………………………………………………….……………………...11 PAPER I The role of the brown bear Ursus arctos as a legitimate megafaunal seed disperser………………..…30 PAPER II The bear-berry connection: ecological and management implications of
    [Show full text]
  • Covanta Rookery Pit Incinerator - Reference No EPR/WP3234DY/A001
    Covanta Rookery Pit Incinerator - Reference No EPR/WP3234DY/A001 Dear Sirs I am writing to you on behalf of Bedfordshire Against Covanta Incinerator (BACI) - A coalition of Residents, Parish & Borough Councillors and Action Groups members who are proactively expressing their concern and - where appropriate - protesting against the Covanta Incinerator at Rookery Pit. There is a great deal of public interest in this development as demonstrated by the following: 3,626 people have signed our petition located at https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/stop-covanta- building-an-efw-incinerator-plant.html - paper copy available if requested in writing Our Facebook group member numbers are currently 1,448 Our website has received 8,287 visits since its launch in November 2016 We believe that a permit should not be granted by the Environment Agency to Covanta to operate an Incineration Plant to be located at Rookery Pit South, Bedfordshire. There are a great many factors involved in this development the Environment Agency must take into consideration. These include: Covanta as an operator, Veolia as a supplier, the time elapsed since planning approval, the local area weather issues, the local area impacts, impacts further afield, Greenhouse Gases impact/Carbon Budget and Government Policies. Since the Covanta Incinerator received planning permission in 2011 there have been a number of new and updated Governmental and EU policies regarding the Environment that will have significance in this permit decision. These include (but are not limited to) - Natural Environment White Paper, the England Biodiversity Strategy, Water for Life, the Waste Policy Review, the National Climate Change Adaptation Programme, the revised EU air quality standards and the Green Book: valuation of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Conservation Upper Thames Branch Silver-Washed Fritillary
    Butterfly Conservation Upper Thames Branch Silver-washed Fritillary Report 2006-7 Mick Campbell Many thanks to everyone who sent in sightings of Silver-washed Fritillary, in particular Chris Brown who monitored Crowsley Park Wood on a daily basis throughout the season, capturing the timing of different events, such as pairing and roosting habits of this beautiful butterfly. From the left: Silver-washed Fritillary male on bramble showing the distinctive black streaks of scent-scales near the middle of the forewing; female on buddleia; and the valezina form of the female (photos © Peter Hall, David Redhead & Tony Croft respectively) The Silver-washed Fritillary is a strong, fast flying woodland species, preferring mixed woodland with an open canopy, sunny glades and rides, with bramble as the favoured nectar source. They lay their eggs on oaks and rough-barked conifers where their foodplant of violet is present nearby. Interestingly, a report was also received from Jan Haseler in 2007 of a female appearing to oviposit on alder. Silver-washed Fritillary has been expanding its range in recent years and in the hot summer of 2006 it was particularly successful, with ‘wanderers’ turning up in 12 gardens, compared with 3 sightings in gardens during the 2007 season. First sighting Last sighting Number seen 2006 22-Jun-06 24-Aug-06 389 2007 17-Jun-07 07-Sept-07 306 As this species has a very long flight period, the peak emergence is difficult to pinpoint, but the maximum numbers are counted from about 11th July through to 10th August, with the first females being noted 2-3 weeks after the first male is sighted.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Invertebrate Survey
    Crane Park, Twickenham: preliminary invertebrate survey. Richard A. Jones. 2010 Crane Park, Twickenham: preliminary invertebrate survey BY RICHARD A. JONES F.R.E.S., F.L.S. 135 Friern Road, East Dulwich, London SE22 0AZ CONTENTS Summary . 2 Introduction . 3 Methods . 3 Site visits . 3 Site compartments . 3 Location and collection of specimens . 4 Taxonomic coverage . 4 Survey results . 4 General . 4 Noteworthy species . 5 Discussion . 9 Woodlands . 9 Open grassland . 10 River bank . 10 Compartment breakdown . 10 Conclusion . 11 References . 12 Species list . 13 Page 1 Crane Park, Twickenham: preliminary invertebrate survey. Richard A. Jones. 2010 Crane Park, Twickenham: preliminary invertebrate survey BY RICHARD A. JONES F.R.E.S., F.L.S. 135 Friern Road, East Dulwich, London SE22 0AZ SUMMARY An invertebrate survey of Crane Park in Twickenham was commissioned by the London Borough of Richmond to establish a baseline fauna list. Site visits were made on 12 May, 18 June, 6 and 20 September 2010. Several unusual and scarce insects were found. These included: Agrilus sinuatus, a nationally scarce jewel beetle that breeds in hawthorn Argiope bruennichi, the wasp spider, recently starting to spread in London Dasytes plumbeus, a nationally scarce beetle found in grassy places Ectemnius ruficornis, a nationally scarce wasp which nests in dead timber Elodia ambulatoria, a nationally rare fly thought to be a parasitoid of tineid moths breeding in bracket fungi Eustalomyia hilaris, a nationally rare fly that breeds in wasp burrows in dead timber
    [Show full text]
  • Beetles of Hertfordshire – Corrections and Amendments, with an Update on Additional Species, and Other Important New Records Trevor J
    Lepidoptera (butterfl ies): Andrew Wood, 93 Hertfordshire Environmental Records Centre, Bengeo Street, Hertford, SG14 3EZ; Tel: 01992- Grebe House, St Michael’s Street, St Albans, AL3 4SN, 503571; email: [email protected] and records Tel: 01727 858901; email: [email protected] via www. hertsmiddx-butterfl ies.org.uk/recording- new.php A big thank you to Trevor James and Rev Tom Gladwin for an enormous recording eff ort for the Hymenoptera (Formicidae; ants): Phil Attewell, County over many years. Trevor is taking a step 69 Thornbury Gardens, Borehamwood, WD6 1RD; back but still involved with the fl ora. He remains the email: [email protected] recorder for Beetles. Many thanks to our new recorders for taking on Hymenoptera (bees and wasps), millipedes groups this past year. Drs Ian Denholm and Alla and centipedes: Stephen Lings Email: lings24@ Mashanova will be managing the fl ora,David Willis btinternet.com the arachnids and Stephen Lings the bees, wasps, millipedes and centipedes. There are still a number of Coleoptera (beetles – general): Trevor James, 56 vacancies for particular groups. If anyone has some Back Street, Ashwell, Baldock, SG7 5PE; Tel: 01462 expertise/interest in any of the groups below or any 742684; email: [email protected] groups not currently covered within Hertfordshire, please contact the Chair of the Biological Recorders, Dr Coleoptera (water beetles): Stuart Warrington, 8 Ronni Edmonds-Brown, Department of Biological and Redwoods, Welwyn Garden City, AL8 7NR; Tel: 01707 Environmental Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, 885676; email: stuart.warrington@ nationaltrust.org. Hatfi eld, AL10 9AB Email: v.r.edmonds-brown@herts.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedfordshire Naturalist
    The BEDFORDSHIRE NATURALIST BEING THE JOURNAL OF THE BEDFORDSHIRE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY AND FIELD CLUB FOR THE YEAR 1958 No. 13 Price Five Shillings PUBLISHED BY THE BEDFORDSHIRE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY & FIELD CLUB BEDFORD STONEBRIDGES PRINTERS LIMITED 1959 BEDFORDSHIRE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY & FIELD CLUB 1959 President I. G. DONY, Ph.D. Past Presidents SIR FREDERICK MANDER, M.A., B.Sc. OLIVER G. PIKE, F.R.P.S., M.B.O.D. MAJOR SIMON WHITBREAD, B.A., D.L., I.P. Chairman F. G. R. SOPER, I.P. Hon. General Secretary HENRY A. S. KEY, M.P.S., 61B GOLDINGTON ROAD, BEDFORD. Hon. Programme Secretary L. A. SPEED, 226 GOLDINGTON ROAD, BEDFORD. Hon. Treasurer I. M. DYMOND, 91 PUTNOE LANE, BEDFORD. Hon. Editor A. W. GUPPY, 53 GRANGE LANE, BROMHAM. Hon. Librarian MISS E. PROCTOR, B.Sc., THE NATURE ROOM, 4 THE AVENUE, BEDFORD. Council W. DURANT MIssE. PROCTOR A. I. DYMOND- (Co-opted) S. W. RODELL I. I. N. FERGUSON-LEES MISS G. M. TATTAM W. G. HARPER R. G. STEPHENSON E. MEADOWS B. B. WEST K. E. WEST RECORDERS BOTANY: Except Fungi: I. G. Dony, Ph.D., 41 Somerset Avenue, Luton. Fungi: D. A. Reid, B.Sc., The Herbarium, Royal Botanical Gardens, METEOROLOGY: Kew. A. W. -Guppy, B.Sc., .53 Grange Lane, Bromham. PALAEONTOLOGY: P. I., Smart, F.R.E.S., 1 Laburnum Avenue, Bedford. ZOOWGY: Crustacea: Miss E. Proctor, B.Sc., 253 Goldington Road, Bedford. Insecta: Hymenoptera: V. H. Chambers, Ph.D., 47 Westbourne Road, Luton. Lepidoptera: B. B. West, 37 Cardington Road, Bedford. Odonata: K. E. West, 37 Cardington Road, Bedford.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Nature Conservation
    Welsh Government M4 Corridor around Newport Environmental Statement Volume 1 Chapter 10: Ecology and Nature Conservation M4CAN-DJV-EBD-ZG_GEN--REP-EN-0021.docx At Issue | March 2016 CVJV/AAR 3rd Floor Longross Court, 47 Newport Road, Cardiff CF24 0AD Welsh Government M4 Corridor around Newport Environmental Statement Volume 1 Contents Page 10 Ecology and Nature Conservation 10-1 10.1 Introduction 10-1 10.2 Legislation and Policy Context 10-2 10.3 Assessment Methodology 10-10 10.4 Baseline Environment 10-45 Statutory Designated Sites 10-45 Non-Statutory Designated Sites 10-49 Nature Reserves 10-52 Habitats 10-52 Species (Flora) 10-76 Species (Fauna) 10-80 Invasive Alien Species 10-128 Summary Evaluation of Ecological Baseline 10-132 Ecological Units 10-135 Future Baseline Conditions 10-136 10.5 Ecological Mitigation and Monitoring 10-140 10.6 Effects Resulting from Changes in Air Quality 10-159 10.7 Assessment of Land Take Effects 10-165 Designated Sites 10-166 Rivers (Usk and Ebbw) 10-171 Reens, Ditches, Reedbeds and Ponds 10-173 Grazing Marsh 10-182 Farmland 10-187 Industrial Land 10-196 Bats 10-200 Breeding Birds 10-203 Wintering Birds 10-204 Complementary Measures 10-206 10.8 Assessment of Construction Effects 10-206 Designated Sites 10-206 Rivers (Usk and Ebbw) 10-210 Reens, Ditches, Reedbeds and Ponds 10-226 Grazing Marsh 10-245 Farmland 10-249 Industrial Land 10-260 Bats 10-263 Breeding Birds 10-291 Wintering Birds 10-292 Welsh Government M4 Corridor around Newport Environmental Statement Volume 1 Complementary Measures 10-295 10.9
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Bedfordshire Butterflies Report for 2019
    DRAFT 2019 Bedfordshire Butterfly Report destined to be published in Bedfordshire Naturalist The photographs herein are only to illustrate this DRAFT – others will be sought for publication Butterflies 2019 Keith Balmer With no exceptionally warm days in January it was a quiet month for butterflies with just a Red Admiral seen on the 8th and a Peacock on the 28th. February was a much warmer month which elicited a lot more activity. The first Small Tortoiseshell was seen on the 5th, Brimstone on the 9th and Comma on the 15th. By the 24th the balmy weather had also brought out a Large White and three Small Whites. The counts by the end of February were extraordinary: Brimstone 245, Comma 54, Large White 1, Peacock 14, Red Admiral 30, Small Tortoiseshell 61, Small White 4, making a total of 409 adults and seven species! March was another warm month resulting in an advanced start to the season for four more species: Speckled Wood on the 2nd, Orange Tip and Holly Blue on the 24th, and Green-veined White on the 29th. On the 30th a Painted Lady was seen in the van of a strong migration which saw large numbers arrive in the UK later in the year. 12 species and 706 butterflies were reported during March. April opened with another early sighting, a Green Hairstreak on the 1st. Small Copper showed next on the 15th, followed by Grizzled Skipper on the 19th, Duke of Burgundy on the 20th, Small Heath on the 21st and Dingy Skipper on the 22nd. Fine weather in week 16 (16th to 22nd April) produced a large volume of sightings and resultant spike in the weekly data.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Contaminated Land Strategy
    Aylesbury Vale District Council : Contaminated Land Strategy : July 2001 Aylesbury Vale District Council Statutory Contaminated Land Strategy Required under the provisions of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 Section 78B Rachel Christie Head of Environmental Health Services PO Box 459 Aylesbury HP20 1YW Fax (01296) 585674 DX 4130 Aylesbury www.aylesburyvaledc.gov.uk Visitors please call at 66 High Street Aylesbury 1 Aylesbury Vale District Council : Contaminated Land Strategy : July 2001 Contents Page Introduction & Overview i.1 Background to the legislation 4 i.2 Explanation of terms 5 i.3 National objectives of the new regime 6 i.4 Local objectives 7 i.5 About this strategy 8 i.6 Roles and responsibilities 9 i.7 Outline of the statutory procedure 9 i.8 Situations where this regime does not apply 11 i.9 Land under the ownership of the enforcing authority 13 i.10 The need for team working 13 i.11 Financial and manpower implications 14 The Strategy Part 1 - Description of the Aylesbury Vale Council area and how its 15 particular characteristics impact on the inspection strategy Part 2 - Identification of potentially contaminated sites and their 23 prioritisation according to risk Part 3 - Obtaining further information on pollutant linkages and 27 the risk assessment process Part 4 - The written record of determination and formal notification 31 Part 5 - Liability and enforcement 33 Part 6 - Data handling and access to information 36 Part 7 - Quality control, performance indicators and arrangements 38 for review Part 8 - Projected costs
    [Show full text]
  • A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvements
    A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements TR010044 Volume 6 6.1 Environmental Statement Chapter 13: Road Drainage and Water Environment Planning Act 2008 Regulation 5(2)(a) Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 26 February 2021 PCF XXX PRODUCT NAME | VERSION 1.0 | 25 SEPTEMBER 2013 | 5124654 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Environmental Statement - Chapter 13: Road Drainage and the Water Environment Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Development Consent Order 202[ ] Chapter 13: Road Drainage and the Water Environment Regulation Reference: Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010044 Reference Application Document Reference TR010044/APP/6.1 Author A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version Rev 1 26 February 2021 DCO Application Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010044 Application Document Ref: TR010044/APP/6.1 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Environmental Statement - Chapter 13: Road Drainage and the Water Environment Table of contents Chapter Pages 13 Road drainage and the water environment 3 13.1 Competent expert evidence 3 13.2 Legislative and policy framework 3 13.3 Assessment methodology 8 13.4 Assessment assumptions and limitations 21 13.5 Study area 25 13.6 Baseline conditions 26 13.7 Potential impacts 53 13.8 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures 55 13.9 Assessment of significant effects 88 13.10 Monitoring 134 13.11 References 136 Table of Tables Table 13-1. Criteria to determine receptor importance......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ED222 Aylesbury Vale Local Plan
    Heritage Appraisal Aylesbury Vale District Council July 2019 Heritage Appraisal Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Katerina Koukouthaki Gillian Scott Mark Fessey Built Heritage Consultant Principal Heritage Consultant Associate Director Orlando Prestidge Andy Mayes, Dr. Steven Smith Senior Archaeological Consultant Associate Director, Heritage Technical Director Revision history Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position Distribution list # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name AECOM Heritage Appraisal Prepared for: Aylesbury Vale District Council Prepared by: Katerina Koukouthaki Built Heritage Consultant E: [email protected] M: +44-(0)7825-709-036 Orlando Prestidge Senior Archaeological Consultant E: [email protected] M: +-44-(0)-778-559-2713 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited The Colmore Building Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT United Kingdom © 2019 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
    [Show full text]