DOCSLIB.ORG

Richard Holloway V. Consolidated Coal Company

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Richard Holloway V. Consolidated Coal Company STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION 215 PROFESSIONAL BUILDING 1036 QUARRIER STREET CHARLESTON. WEST VIRGINIA 25301 ARCH A MOORE. jR TELEPHONE 304-348-2616 Governor October 8, 1987 Richard Holloway 133 Savannah Ave. Westover, WV 26505 Consolidation Coal Co. P.O. Box 1314 Morgantown, WV 26505 Danny L. Fassio, Esq. Consolidation Coal Co. 1800 Washington Rd. Pittsburg, PA 15241 Allan N. Karlin, Esq. 174 Chancery Row Morgantown, WV 26505 Franklin Cleckley, Esq. P.O. Box 4 Morgantown, WV 26505 Robert M. Steptoe, Jr., Esq. Steptoe & Johnson Union National Center East Clarksburg, WV 26301 RE: Holloway v. 'Consolidation Coal Co. ER-486-86 Dear Parties: Herewith, please find the final order of the WV Human Rights Com- mission in the above-styled and numbered case. Pursuant to WV Code, Chapter 5, Article 11, Section 11, amended and effective April 1, 1987, any party adversely affected by this final order Richard Holloway October 8, 1987 Page two may file a petition for review with the supreme court of appeals with- in 30 days of receipt of this final order. Howard D. Kenney Executive Directo HDK/mst Attachments CERTIFIEDMAIL-RE~~ RECEIPT REQDtSTED NCT:C~ OF STATUTORY RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW .i:\."".,E)TD ED A~T:) E~:EC:' :-r:: 1 (a: F:-Qr7'. ~:::9~f~::~l or dsr 0[· ~::'2 c:Jr:::7.t:S3~O:1.. an e) :.;:~i:c:,.::o;: fer :-2'0":2'.': r.::.::,. b2 ;::'G'::2~:"::::4:' b:: ~~c::e!"' .., ' .., ... .. .. OJ Pj.:-::: to :::~ s:.:;:r::::,.e ~:L:::0: :.l;;:e:::'~3 '."::C':;'::: ~:::!..::;.cays •• , " •• , I .•••• •• r:·0~. c::~ !'":'.;e:;:c ~.--:::-':''';: a~:~..-':: :::~::; 0: \l ;:t::::~on ... .. ::-:~~::IJr co 5~~~~ C~L::': :1;;=":::::;: ~::2: L:Jr..:-:-::~3:tJn ::":".c. t:;.e ~C:'/~:-3~ p~:-::/ as :t;::;=ur:lle!'::..:. c..::C: ~::~ c::::-:..: at 5~C~ -I ccur ; shc ll noc:E:: e::L:~ 0: C:'"':e: r:::::;onJ.~~.~3 arid t:t~ S commission of ~;.2 fiIir::; of such ;:.:::c:on. The COr.1:-:l.tS- sicn 5h~!1. \vfc.~in C~!1 d~:::3 ::.r:::::* r~t.:~fpc or such notice, f1[ e v: ic:: c!;!:! c!e r :( 0 ( C:~ t::: c 0 u r : c:: ere c G r C. o t t!1 e •••••• , ••• I •• • • 1 :~t! co u r ; 0 r ~~:1:: J ~ G.~';~ ~~ :: :.2'J: t:-: .".~:'l::'::!J:1 rn ~:l' C::~~=T.1;';C:1 c!~~~:.~~:-:t! 9.V;:~~;:~!·or l:0C ~: ~·~'::~'.'ishall bt:: :;:-:'::-::2,j ...-\.:-:C: tr" ~:-::::c:::·.1 co ~!. ~u;.!·:::::il~:::~.CIJ{ ~!-::~:5~~ce. 1.5 h~ shall be r~~'Jr~"=·i to e;:~I':·..!~~ :.~c~'i~':!".';::::c~e clerk IS b~~·ore such or de r or r:v~~t,'.~ :::--:~Ir br;:I';'J~.~ c::c'.::i",e. a 17 bon d. w ich S 2 C ''': r i:::to b ~ a :; ;J ro ': eci b :: t h ~ c: er k. 18 conditioned to perforrn any' jr..:C::!:::en~ which may be 19 awarded o.~::..tns~ him th e r eon. The commission may .j,20 cer::f:t to the court arid re~~e~: its decision of any .:....:.. question of 1::\;- a:"'t.5!r1g upon c:-:e r eccrd. arid withhold ..,.') iC5 ftlr'~!:~~·prac,=~di;:g in tr;e C::~-2. p'2~d~~g- c;:e decision 2:) or cour ; on :r.8 c9~:lfted quest io n. or u:!::i notice that the .) I court has c.e/.:llr.eC: to COC:·:2t ~::~ 5:-..~-2. [:. a review be :25 g:-=-~.:ed or t h e c~~:ifie'i q!"':2::::IJ:: c e d~,ck=:2:d for "_'J. r:e~:-:n:;.t::2 c~e~:,s~:lrI ncc~f:,j·~:-.288:1':-::: 8,;:C :::2 parties 27 litigan; or their attorneys arid c;'.e ccrnmissicn of the fact 0'" .:..'-' :23 bv• mail~ .••• __ •• r:J" ~(,l. ~'-..eviewI..V be 0'"",,-..,-r.:.,l_ •••.••.•• _ '" \" •••. 0;;;;; ce••.•••••• r cified4.•• 1. question'- •• ·'. :29 docketed. the C:!..S2 shall be l::::=.:-dby the COtl!"C in the 30 mariner provided fer ocher cases. .•..... , i V.J..'='1 The appeal procedure con;:;~.:::ed in this subsection •..... v •..., sh al l be the exclusive means of r-aview. notwithstanding , . .." ... .. .. trie orOYI:5IOr.S or cnc ace r twentv-rune-a ems coae: ...• , 0. v-: Prot·",ded. 1(13.C such e:-:c!:.:sive r..~~!"'.sof review shall not apply to 0.;).:: case \vhe:-e~n an a ppe al 01" 3. pe ti tion for e nfor cernent of a ce:lse arid ce::isc order has been filed \V1Cl: a circuit court of this state prier to the firs; day of Apr il, one thousand nine hundr sd e!g-h~:!-:;2':2n. .......• 9 (Enr. E. B. 2638 39 (0) In the event that any person shall tan to obey a -to f:~:l.loreer oc the commission within thir::-' days after 41 re-:e!;=c of the sarns. or. if applicable. within thir:] days 4:2 a'::e!":l. fi:1:.i order at the supreme court of appeals. a ;.t~ p:1.:-::: or the commission may seek an order from the 4~ clrcuit COl.;:: for its enforcement, Such proceeding shall ~5 C~ :ni~::.:aci 0:' t::'e fiiing of a petition in said court, arid ";6 s.::';ec ucon the respondent in the mariner provided by 47 law for ~he service ot summons in civil actions: a hearing 43 shall b.: held on such petlc:on" within sixty days of the 49 date of service. The court may g'!"j.nc appropriate 50 temporcry relief, and shall make and enter upon the 51 pleadings. tescirnony and proceedings such order as is 5:2 ne'.:e53:':-:: co enforce the order oc the commission or J I I 1- BEFORE ras WEST VIRGINIA HUMAN RIGII'S C(M.1ISSION RIOIARD OOI.LCMAY, CCMPLAINANT , v Docket No: ER 486-86 CONSOLIDATED COAL COMPANY, RESPONDENT . FINAL ORDER On the 8th day of October 1987, the Commission reviewed the proposed order and decision of Hearing Examiner, James Gerl, in the above-captioned matter. After consideration of the aforementioned and exceptions thereto, the Commission does hereby adopt said proposed order and decision, encompassing proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, discussion of conclusions, and relief, as its own, with modifications and amendments set forth below. In the subsection titled Findings of Fact, the paragraph enumerated as 21 is modified by striking the number "136.9" contained therein and substituting therefor the number "146.3." In the subsection titled Discussions of Conclusions, referencing the 2nd paragraph contained therein, the final sentence which reads, "He had never received a suspension, a written reprimand or an oral reprimand from respondent in twenty-one years of employment" is stricken. Substituted therefor is the following language: "The evidence further reveals that non-members of the protected class were not disciplined or were disciplined less severely than the complainant, although engaging in similar if not more egregious conduct. State ex rei. State Human Rights Commission v Logan-Mingo Area Health Agency, Inc., 329 S.E. 2d 77 (W.Va. 1985, Burdette v FMC Corp., 566 F. Supp. 808 (N.D. W.Va. 1983)." Based upon the foregoing, it is hereby Ordered that the Hearing Examiner's Proposed Order and Decision be attached hereto and made a part of this Final Order except as amended by this Final Order. It is further Ordered as follows: 1. The complaint of Richard Holloway is sustained. 2. Respondent shall immediately cease and desist from discriminating against individuals on the basis of race in making employment decisions. 3. Respondent shall offer and unconditionally reinstate complainant into his former position, with full benefits and seniority restored, at a rate of pay comparable to that which complainant would be receiving but for the unlawful termination, within 30 days. 4. Respondent shall pay complainant a sum equal to the wages he would have earned but for respondent's unlawful termination of complainant's employment. Such wages for the period from the date of complainant's discharge to September 20, 1987, is $99,458.53. Compounded interest on said backpay award shall be computed at the statutory rate of 10%. Respondent shall pay said amount plus interest within 30 days. For each subsequent month thereafter an additional $4,972.93 shall be added, less any interim wages earned by complainant, until complainant is reinstated or refuses a bona fide offer of reinstatement. 5. Respondent shall pay complainant within 30 days the sum of $8,000.00 for incidental damages for humiliation, embarassment, emotional and mental distress and loss of personhood and dignity 2 as a result of the discriminatory treatment toward him by the agents and employees of respondent. Respondent shall pay complainant's reasonable attorney fees in the amount of $21,945.00 for Allan Karlin and $5,625.00 for Franklin Cleckley. (Said fee affidavits are appended as Exhibit A.) 6. Respondent shall pay complainant the sum of $1,280.30 for costs reasonably expended by complainant and reasonably necessary to the litigation of this matter. (Said cost schedule is appended as Exhibit B.) Complainant is directed to surrender any transcripts of this matter in the possession of complainant to the respondent forthwith after respondent has complied with all provisions of this Order. It is finally ORDERED that respondent provide to t.he Commission proof of compliance with the Commission's Final Order within 35 days of service of said Final Order by copies of cancelled checks, affidavits or other means calculated to provide such proof. By this Final Order, a copy of which shall be sent by certified mail to the parties, the parties are hereby notified that they have ten days to request a reconsideration of this Final Order and that they may seek judicial review.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 VALENA ELIZABETH BEETY Professor, West Virginia University
    VALENA ELIZABETH BEETY Professor, West Virginia University College of Law, P.O. Box 6130, Morgantown, WV 26501 [email protected] (304) 293-7520 EDUCATION University of Chicago Law School, J.D. 2006 Staff Member, UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW Fellow, University of Chicago Law School Stonewall Fellowship Fellow, The Alfred B. Teton Civil and Human Rights Scholarship University of Chicago, the College, B.A., Anthropology, with Honors 2002 Richter Grant for Undergraduate Research, Chicago Legal Aid for Incarcerated Mothers Metcalf Fellow, Governor’s Commission on the Status of Women in Illinois Fulbright/IIE Teacher, Lycee Darchicourt, Henin-Beaumont, France ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE West Virginia University Professor of Law (tenured) 2017 – present Adjunct Professor of Forensic & Investigative Sciences 2017 – 2020 Associate Professor of Law 2012 – 2017 Director of the West Virginia Innocence Project 2012 – present Deputy Director of the Clinical Law Program 2012 – 2017 Founder and Co-Director Appalachian Justice Initiative 2016 – present Founder and Co-Director LL.M. in Forensic Justice Online 2013 – 2016 Founder University of Chicago-WVU Franklin Cleckley Fellowship 2013 – present Courses: Criminal Procedure I, Post-Conviction Remedies, Forensic Justice Seminar, Forensic Justice Online, Innocence Clinic University of Colorado Law School Visiting Scholar Spring 2015 University of Texas School of Law Big XII Faculty Fellow October 2013 University of Mississippi School of Law Senior Staff Attorney, Innocence Project 2009 – 2012 Adjunct Professor of Law 2010 – 2012 Courses: Identity and Criminality, Civil Rights and Prisons, Innocence Clinic CLERKSHIPS The Honorable Martha Craig Daughtrey, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 2007 – 2008 The Honorable Chief Judge James G.
    [Show full text]
  • Dead Man Talking: a Historical Analysis of West Virginia's Dead Man's Statute and a Recommendation for Reform
    Volume 109 Issue 3 Article 11 June 2019 Dead Man Talking: A Historical Analysis of West Virginia's Dead Man's Statute and a Recommendation for Reform Wesley P. Page West Virginia University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Evidence Commons Recommended Citation Wesley P. Page, Dead Man Talking: A Historical Analysis of West Virginia's Dead Man's Statute and a Recommendation for Reform, 109 W. Va. L. Rev. 897 (2019). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol109/iss3/11 This Student Work is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Page: Dead Man Talking: A Historical Analysis of West Virginia's Dead M DEAD MAN TALKING: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF WEST VIRGINIA'S DEAD MAN'S STATUTE AND A RECOMMENDATION FOR REFORM 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 898 II. DEAD MAN'S STATUTES IN GENERAL ................................................ 899 A. A GeneralBackground of Witness Competency .................... 899 B. The Theory Behind the Abolition of Disqualificationby Interest................................................................................... 900 C. Recent Trends in the United States and West Virginia.......... 901 III. A HISTORY OF THE DEAD MAN'S
    [Show full text]
  • Yale Graduates and Progressive Ideals at the University of Mississippi Law School, 1946-1970
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Spring 5-1-2015 Rebel Yale: Yale Graduates and Progressive Ideals at the University of Mississippi Law School, 1946-1970 Jennifer Paul Anderson University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Educational Leadership Commons, Higher Education Commons, and the Other History Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Jennifer Paul, "Rebel Yale: Yale Graduates and Progressive Ideals at the University of Mississippi Law School, 1946-1970" (2015). Dissertations. 92. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/92 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi REBEL YALE: YALE GRADUATES AND PROGRESSIVE IDEALS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI LAW SCHOOL, 1946-1970 by Jennifer Paul Anderson Abstract of a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2015 ABSTRACT REBEL YALE: YALE GRADUATES AND PROGRESSIVE IDEALS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI LAW SCHOOL, 1946-1970 by Jennifer Paul Anderson May 2015 The University of Mississippi School of Law (Ole Miss Law) was the fourth public law school founded in the United States. The school was established to prevent men from leaving the state for legal education due to fears that they were being indoctrinated by eastern schools where ideologies were not consistent with those of Mississippi.
    [Show full text]
  • 5/10/79 [2] Folder Citation: Collection: Office of Staff Secretary
    5/10/79 [2] Folder Citation: Collection: Office of Staff Secretary; Series: Presidential Files; Folder: 5/10/79 [2]; Container 116 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Staff_Secretary.pdf ·�-- .-.... , THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON -, 10 May 79 Tim Kraft . ARnie Miller :. ' ,·, .The attached.was returned in ·the.·: President' s- outbox· _today. and -is forwarded to you for ¥il1if!' :ia,.i8EHlaliitm, . O.p?'•preiA-fe ' � �� � __ ·- . hAnil.�,. Ri�k � hes � .:>:: . ··, FOR STAFFING FOR INFORMATION / FROM PRESIDENT'S OUTBOX LOG INJTO PRESIDENT TODAY IMMEDIATE TURNAROUND NO DEADLINE LAST DAY FOR ACTION VICE PRESIDENT ARONSON JORDAN RTTTLF.R EIZENSTAT H CARTER l./ KRAFT .CLOUGH LIPSHUTZ CRUIKSHANK MOORE FIRST LADY POWELL HARDEN RAFSHOON HERNANDEZ WATSON HUTCHESON WEXLER KAHN BRZEZINSKI LINDER MCINTYRE MARTIN SCHULTZE v MILLER MOE ADAMS PETERSON ANDRUS PETTIGREW BELL PRESS BERGLAND SANDERS BLUMENTHAL WARREN BROWN WEDDINGTON CALIFANO WISE HARRIS VOORDE KREPS MARSHALL SCHLESINGER STRAUSS VANCE ADMIN. CONFIDEN. CONFIDENTIAL SECRET EYES ONLY . THE WHITE HO USE WASHINGTON May 8, 1979 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: TIM KRAFT 1 !/. � ARNIE MILLER� SUBJECT: Selection of HEW's General Counsel and Other Key Positions Secretary Califano has recommended that Richard Beattie be nomin�ted to replace Peter Libassi as the General Counsel of HEW (see attached memorandum). We agree with Secretary Califano's �ssessment of Dick Beattie and join in recommend­ ing him for this position. However, the selection of a white male to replace a white male in a key policy position once again raises a serious problem at HEW. On December 6, 1978, we pointed out in the attached memorandum that HEW is perceived by minority and women's groups and others as being controlled by white males.
    [Show full text]
  • Why They Provide the Best Education for Low-Income Children
    Small Schools Photo by Ric MacDowell Why they provide the best education for low-income children A Challenge West Virginia document written by Beth Spence based on the research of Dr. Craig Howley and Dr. Robert Bickel 2000 About the researchers: The information in this publication is based on the work of Dr. Craig Howley and Dr. Robert Bickel. Craig B. Howley, Ed.D., is associate adjunct professor at Ohio University, Athens, Ohio. He was the director of the ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools in Charleston, WV, from 1992-1998. From 1991 to the present, he has been a senior researcher and evaluation specialist for Appalachia Educational Laboratory in Charleston. Dr. Howley received his BA in English and Comparative Literature from Columbia College, New York City, in June 1970. His Master’s De- gree in Gifted Education, August 1982, is from West Virginia Gradu- ate College, South Charleston, West Virginia. The Ed.D. in Education Ad- ministration was conferred by West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, in May 1996. Dr. Howley is the author of more than 30 journal articles and numer- ous other papers. He resides at 75619 Lively Ridge Road, Rt. 1 – Box 88B, Albany, OH 45710. Phone: 740-698- 0309. E-mail: [email protected]. Robert Bickel, Ph.D., has been a professor of Educational Leadership, College of Education and Human Services, at Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, since 1994. He is a full member of the graduate faculty at Marshall and the graduate faculty at West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV. Dr. Bickel received his BA in sociology from Pennsylvania State University in March 1971 and his Master’s Degree in sociology from the same institution in December 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Batch Print Jobs
    WVU College of Law Alumni Jobs Newsletter - April 2021 April 2021 Newsletter.html[4/14/2021 11:05:55 AM] WVU College of Law: Batch Print Jobs Attorney Legal Aid of West Virginia Position Type: Full-time Geographic Preference: Midwest (KY, WV, OH, IN, MI, IL, MO, IA, MN, WI) Description: Beckley or Princeton Attorney Legal Aid of West Virginia (LAWV) is seeking a skilled motivated attorney to join our Lawyer in the School Team serving Southern West Virginia in either our Beckley or Princeton Office. This is a grant funded position which ends on June 30, 2022. LAWV offers a great family friendly work environment and excellent benefit package which includes medical, dental and life insurance and paid leave. As an attorney for the expanded Lawyer in the School project, you will provide outreach at schools in southern West Virginia, while hosting on-site legal clinics for school families. Duties will include conducting intakes to establish eligibility and acceptance of cases for advice or representation. When appropriate, you will represent clients in court and before quasi-judicial or administrative agencies, with support from and collaboration with other attorneys and community partners. Additionally, you will assist in project evaluation and reporting. The coalfields of southern West Virginia have historically been home to the majority of the state’s miners and their families. This once-booming region literally fueled the nation. However, the vast decline in the coal industry has left much of this area economically depressed and families in need. This position is chance to work on the front lines in the battle against poverty and family instability, while serving to rebuild communities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Report West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
    West Virginia Court System 2012 Annual Report Honorable Menis E. Ketchum Chief Justice Honorable Robin Jean Davis Honorable Brent D. Benjamin Honorable Margaret L. Workman Honorable Thomas E. McHugh Justices Rory L. Perry II Clerk of Court Steven D. Canterbury Administrative Director Editor Jennifer Bundy, Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Assistant Editors April Harless, Public Information Specialist, Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Vaughan Summers, Assistant Clerk Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Statistical Analyst Autumn Johnson, Senior Analyst, Division of Court Services Graphic Design Michael Switzer, DesignWorks Cover photos and inside credits page photo provided by Thorney Lieberman Photo details of county courthouses on pages 89-144 by Michael Switzer and Jeff Genter Published by the Administrative Office of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia 1900 Kanawha Blvd. E. • State Capitol Building One, Room E-100 • Charleston, WV 25305 Phone: 304-558-0145 TTY: 304-558-4219 • Fax: 304-558-1212 WEST VI RGINI A C OU RT SYSTEM 2012 Contents 51 Court Security 52 In Memoriam 53-55 Election Results 56-58 Other Judicial Changes 59 Transitions 60-63 Awards 64 Association Officers 65 Court Conferences 66-67 Janie Moore Profile 68 Roster of Circuit Court Judges 5-9 Supreme Court Justices 23 Business Court 69 Overview of Circuit Courts 10-11 Clerk Becomes Justice 24-25 Mass Litigation Panel 70-74 Circuit Court Statistics 26-27 Judicial Truancy Programs 75 Roster of Family Court Judges
    [Show full text]
  • VALENA ELIZABETH BEETY Professor, West Virginia University College of Law, P.O
    VALENA ELIZABETH BEETY Professor, West Virginia University College of Law, P.O. Box 6130, Morgantown, WV 26501 [email protected] (304) 293-7520 EDUCATION University of Chicago Law School, J.D. 2006 Staff Member, UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW Fellow, University of Chicago Law School Stonewall Fellowship Fellow, The Alfred B. Teton Civil and Human Rights Scholarship University of Chicago, the College, B.A., Anthropology, with Honors 2002 Richter Grant for Undergraduate Research, Chicago Legal Aid for Incarcerated Mothers Metcalf Fellow, Governor’s Commission on the Status of Women in Illinois Fulbright Scholar, Lycee Darchicourt, Henin-Beaumont, France ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE University of Kentucky College of Law Visiting Professor Fall 2018 Courses: Criminal Law, Criminal Law & Procedure Issues West Virginia University Professor of Law (tenured) 2017 – present Adjunct Professor of Forensic & Investigative Sciences 2017 – 2020 Associate Professor of Law 2012 – 2017 Founding Director of the West Virginia Innocence Project 2012 – present Deputy Director of the Clinical Law Program 2012 – 2017 Founder and Co-Director Appalachian Justice Initiative 2016 – present Founder and Co-Director LL.M. in Forensic Justice Online 2013 – 2016 Founder University of Chicago-WVU Franklin Cleckley Fellowship 2013 – present Courses: Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure I, Post-Conviction Remedies, Forensic Justice Seminar, Forensic Justice Online, Innocence Clinic University of Colorado Law School Visiting Scholar Spring 2015 University of Texas School of Law Big XII Faculty Fellow October 2013 University of Mississippi School of Law Senior Staff Attorney, Innocence Project 2009 – 2012 Adjunct Professor of Law 2010 – 2012 Courses: Identity and Criminality, Civil Rights and Prisons, Innocence Clinic CLERKSHIPS The Honorable Martha Craig Daughtrey, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court 2013 Annual Report
    West Virginia Court System 2013 Annual Report Honorable Brent D. Benjamin Chief Justice Honorable Robin Jean Davis Honorable Margaret L. Workman Honorable Menis E. Ketchum Honorable Allen H. Loughry II Justices Rory L. Perry II Clerk of Court Steven D. Canterbury Administrative Director Editor Jennifer Bundy, Public Information Officer Assistant Editors April Harless, Public Information Specialist Vaughn Summers, Assistant Clerk Statistical Analyst Autumn Johnson, Deputy Director, Division of Court Services Graphic Design Michael Switzer, DesignWorks Cover photos and inside fireworks photo provided by Steven W. Rotsch Photo details of county courthouses on pages 93-148 by Michael Switzer and Jeff Gentner Information about history of courthouses from West Virginia Courthouses, A Pictorial History, by Mary Thrash and Living Monuments: The Courthouses of West Virginia by Debra Warmuth and Richard Warmuth Published by the Administrative Office of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia 1900 Kanawha Blvd., E. • State Capitol Building One, Room E-100 • Charleston, WV 25305 Phone: 304-558-0145 TTY: 304-558-4219 • Fax: 304-558-1212 West Virginia Sesquicentennial WEST VIRGINIA C OURT SYSTEM 2013 Contents 3 From the Chief 50 Mental Hygiene System 5 Justices’ Biographies 52 Court Technology 10 West Virginia Judicial System Chart 53 E-Filing 11 Administrative Office Flow Chart 54 Court Security 12 Court System Budget 55 In Memoriam 14 Supreme Court Statistical Report 56 Transitions 17 Visiting Judges 62 Awards 18 Court Board and Committee Members
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Powers and the Governor's Office in West Virginia
    Volume 109 Issue 1 Article 10 June 2019 Separation of Powers and the Governor's Office inest W Virginia: Advocating a More Deferential Approach to the Chief Executive From the Judiciary Jason C. Pizatella West Virginia University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Judges Commons, Law and Politics Commons, President/Executive Department Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Jason C. Pizatella, Separation of Powers and the Governor's Office inest W Virginia: Advocating a More Deferential Approach to the Chief Executive From the Judiciary, 109 W. Va. L. Rev. (2019). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol109/iss1/10 This Student Work is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pizatella: Separation of Powers and the Governor's Office in West Virginia: SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE IN WEST VIRGINIA: ADVOCATING A MORE DEFERENTIAL APPROACH TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE FROM THE JUDICIARY I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 185 II. B ACKGROUND ........................................................................................ 190 IIl. SEPARATION OF POWERS IN
    [Show full text]
  • "I Will Not Divulge": How to Resolve the "Mass of Legal Confusion" Surrounding the Physician-Patient Relationship in West Virginia
    Volume 110 Issue 3 Article 10 April 2008 "I Will Not Divulge": How to Resolve the "Mass of Legal Confusion" Surrounding the Physician-Patient Relationship in West Virginia Mary Claire Johnson West Virginia University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Health Law and Policy Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons, and the Privacy Law Commons Recommended Citation Mary C. Johnson, "I Will Not Divulge": How to Resolve the "Mass of Legal Confusion" Surrounding the Physician-Patient Relationship in West Virginia, 110 W. Va. L. Rev. (2008). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol110/iss3/10 This Student Work is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Johnson: "I Will Not Divulge": How to Resolve the "Mass of Legal Confusion "I WILL NOT DIVULGE":* HOW TO RESOLVE THE "MASS OF LEGAL CONFUSION"" SURROUNDING THE PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP IN WEST VIRGINIA 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................1232 II. BACKGROUND: FROM MOHR TO PRICE, A HISTORY OF THE MASS OF LEGAL CONFUSION .....................................................1233 A. Mohr, Simmons, and King: The Privilege Doesn't Exist, Does It?.......................................................................................... 12 33 B. Kitzmiller and Morris: Moving Toward Patient Protection1236 C. State ex rel. Allen v. Bedell: Justice Cleckley Checks the Co urt..................................................................................... 12 39 D. Keplinger and Price: The Aftermath of Allen ......................1240 III. PRIVACY, HIPPOCRATES, AND RURAL MEDICINE: WHY THE PRIVILEGE SHOULD BE ADOPTED IN WEST VIRGINIA .........................................1242 A.
    [Show full text]