Supreme Court 2013 Annual Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality
Impeach Brent Benjamin Now!? Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality JEFFREY W. STEMPEL* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION:M EN WITH NO REGRETS AND INADEQUATE CONCERN................... 2 II. CAPERTON V. MASSEY: JUDICIAL ERROR; WASTED RESOURCES; NEW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—AND LIGHT TREATMENT OF THE PERPETRATOR ............................................................................................... 10 A. The Underlying Action............................................................................... 10 B. The 2004 West Virginia Supreme Court Elections..................................... 12 C. Review and Recusal ................................................................................... 13 D. The Supreme Court Intervenes .................................................................. 16 E. Caperton’s Test for Determining When Recusal Is Required by the Due Process Clause ........................................................................ 17 F. Comparing the “Reasonable Question as to Impartiality” Standard for Nonconstitutional Recusal Under Federal and State Law to the “Serious Risk of Bias” Standard for Constitutional Due Process Under Caperton....................................... 19 G. The Dissenters’ Defense of Justice Benjamin—And Defective Judging ...................................................................................... 25 H. Enablers: Reluctance To Criticize Justice Benjamin................................. 28 * © 2010 Jeffrey W. Stempel. Doris S. & Theodore B. Lee Professor -
WEST VIRGINIA HOUSE of DELEGATES, Petitioner, V
No. 18-____ IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— WEST VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES, Petitioner, v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA ex rel. MARGARET L. WORKMAN, MITCH CARMICHAEL, President of the West Virginia Senate; DONNA J. BOLEY, President Pro Tempore of the West Virginia Senate; RYAN FERNS, Majority Leader of the West Virginia Senate; LEE CASSIS, Clerk of the West Virginia Senate; and the WEST VIRGINIA SENATE, Respondents. ———— On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia ———— PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ———— MARK A. CARTER Counsel of Record DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP 707 Virginia Street, East Chase Tower, Suite 1300 Charleston, WV 25301 (304) 357-0900 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner January 8, 2019 WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D. C. 20002 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia’s decision in this case violates the Guarantee Clause of the United States Constitution. 2. Whether the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia properly denied the Motion to Intervene of the Petitioner, the West Virginia House of Delegates. (i) ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING AND RULE 29.6 STATEMENT Respondents are Margaret L. Workman; Mitch Carmichael, President of the West Virginia Senate; Donna J. Boley, President Pro Tempore of the West Virginia Senate; Ryan Ferns, Majority Leader of the West Virginia Senate; Lee Cassis, Clerk of the West Virginia Senate; and the West Virginia Senate. Petitioner is the West Virginia House of Delegates as an indispensable and materially affected party who was wrongfully denied intervenor status. -
State Senate Recorded Votes
West Virginia AFL-CIO 2013 Committee on Political Education - COPE Senate Voting Record No Senate Votes Recorded for 2013 (D): Democrat, (R): Republican – R: Right, W: Wrong, A: Absent, E: Excused, a: abstained Name in Bold: COPE Endorsed in the most recent election. Accumulative DISTRICT - SENATOR - COUNTY TOTAL Next Election R W A SD 1 - Rocky Fitzsimmons (D) Ohio 2014 - - - SD 1 - Jack Yost (D) Brooke 2016 20 0 2 SD 2 - Larry Edgell (D) Wetzel 2014 17 7 0 SD 2 - Jeff Kessler (D) Marshall 2016 22 4 0 SD 3 - Donna Boley (R) Pleasants 2016 15 43 0 SD 3 - David Nohe (R) Wood 2014 0 3 0 SD 4 - Mitch Carmichael (R) Jackson 2016 9 27 4 SD 4 - Mike Hall (R) Putnam 2014 12 36 1 SD 5 - Evan Jenkins (D) Cabell 2014 20 17 0 SD 5 - Robert H. Plymale (D) Wayne 2016 19 18 0 SD 6 - H. Truman Chafin (D) Mingo 2014 53 26 1 SD 6 - Bill Cole (R) Mercer 2016 - - - SD 7 - Ron Stollings (D) Boone 2014 5 2 0 SD 7 - Art Kirkendoll (D) Logan 2016 - - - Accumulative DISTRICT - SENATOR - COUNTY TOTAL Next Election SD 8 - Chris Walters (R) Kanawha 2016 - - - SD 8 - Erik Wells (D) Kanawha 2014 3 5 1 SD 9 - Daniel Hall (D) Wyoming 2016 13 2 0 SD 9 - Mike Green (D) Raleigh 2014 4 3 2 SD 10 - Ronald Miller (D) Greenbrier 2014 2 1 0 SD 10 - William Laird (D) Fayette 2016 14 3 0 SD 11 - Clark Barnes (R) Randolph 2016 4 7 0 SD 11 - Gregory Tucker (D) Nicholas 2014 2 1 0 SD 12 - Sam Cann (D) Harrison 2014 29 30 5 SD 12 - Douglas Facemire (D) Braxton 2016 4 2 0 SD 13 - Robert Beach (D) Monongalia 2014 21 16 0 SD 13 - Roman Prezioso (D) Marion 2016 36 18 3 SD 14 - Bob Williams -
Opinion, Dean and Martha Lowe V. Joseph C. and Joyce Richards, Et Al., No. 13-0234
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2014 Term FILED April 10, 2014 _____________ released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK No. 13-0234 SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS _____________ OF WEST VIRGINIA DEAN LOWE AND MARTHA LOWE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEES OF THE DEMAR REVOCABLE TRUST, Petitioners V. JOSEPH C. RICHARDS AND JOYCE A. RICHARDS, AND HUGH E. HEGYI, TRUSTEE OF THE HERMAN HEGYI TRUST, Respondents Appeal from the Circuit Court of Berkeley County Honorable John C. Yoder, Judge Civil Action No. 11-C-979 REVERSED AND REMANDED Submitted: March 25, 2014 Filed: April 10, 2014 Michael L. Scales, Esq. Charles F. Printz, Jr., Esq. Martinsburg, West Virginia Jonathan T. Mayhew, Esq. Attorney for Petitioners, Bowles Rice LLP Dean and Martha Lowe Martinsburg, West Virginia Attorney for the Respondents, Joseph C. and Joyce A. Richards CHIEF JUSTICE DAVIS delivered the Opinion of the Court. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. “Whenever it is determined that a court has no jurisdiction to entertain the subject matter of a civil action, the forum court must take no further action in the case other than to dismiss it from the docket.” Syllabus point 1, Hinkle v. Bauer Lumber & Home Bldg. Center, Inc., 158 W. Va. 492, 211 S.E.2d 705 (1975). 2. The circuit courts of West Virginia have subject matter jurisdiction to resolve an interstate boundary line dispute between private litigants involving the issue of whether real property is located within the State of West Virginia or another state. Under the decision in Durfee v. -
Hedonic Damages: to Value a Life Or Not to Value a Life
Volume 95 Issue 4 Article 8 June 1993 Hedonic Damages: To Value a Life or Not to Value a Life Douglas L. Price Andsandig, Levicoff, & McDyer, P.C. Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Civil Law Commons Recommended Citation Douglas L. Price, Hedonic Damages: To Value a Life or Not to Value a Life, 95 W. Va. L. Rev. (1993). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol95/iss4/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Price: Hedonic Damages: To Value a Life or Not to Value a Life HEDONIC DAMAGES: TO VALUE A LIFE OR NOT TO VALUE A LIFE? DOUGLAS L. PRICE* I. INTRODUCTION ........................... 1055 II. FLANNERY AND LOSS OF ENJOYMENT OF LIFE ........ 1057 H. PROGRESSION OF Loss OF ENJOYMENT OF LIFE ...... 1060 IV. ADMISSIBILITY OF HEDONIC DAMAGES .............. 1063 A. Personal Injury Claims ................... 1064 1. Opinion Evidence ................... 1067 2. Per Diem Argument .................... 1072 3. Province of the Jury and Speculation ....... 1075 4. Other Decisions ..................... 1079 B. Wrongful Death Actions .................. 1082 V. CONCLUSION ............ ................ 1088 I. INTRODUCTION A novel approach to the estimation of an element of a damage award has recently been proposed in the courts throughout this coun- try. "Hedonic damages" as confronted by the judicial system involves an attempt to place a monetary figure on the value of the loss of enjoyment of life. -
1 VALENA ELIZABETH BEETY Professor, West Virginia University
VALENA ELIZABETH BEETY Professor, West Virginia University College of Law, P.O. Box 6130, Morgantown, WV 26501 [email protected] (304) 293-7520 EDUCATION University of Chicago Law School, J.D. 2006 Staff Member, UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW Fellow, University of Chicago Law School Stonewall Fellowship Fellow, The Alfred B. Teton Civil and Human Rights Scholarship University of Chicago, the College, B.A., Anthropology, with Honors 2002 Richter Grant for Undergraduate Research, Chicago Legal Aid for Incarcerated Mothers Metcalf Fellow, Governor’s Commission on the Status of Women in Illinois Fulbright/IIE Teacher, Lycee Darchicourt, Henin-Beaumont, France ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE West Virginia University Professor of Law (tenured) 2017 – present Adjunct Professor of Forensic & Investigative Sciences 2017 – 2020 Associate Professor of Law 2012 – 2017 Director of the West Virginia Innocence Project 2012 – present Deputy Director of the Clinical Law Program 2012 – 2017 Founder and Co-Director Appalachian Justice Initiative 2016 – present Founder and Co-Director LL.M. in Forensic Justice Online 2013 – 2016 Founder University of Chicago-WVU Franklin Cleckley Fellowship 2013 – present Courses: Criminal Procedure I, Post-Conviction Remedies, Forensic Justice Seminar, Forensic Justice Online, Innocence Clinic University of Colorado Law School Visiting Scholar Spring 2015 University of Texas School of Law Big XII Faculty Fellow October 2013 University of Mississippi School of Law Senior Staff Attorney, Innocence Project 2009 – 2012 Adjunct Professor of Law 2010 – 2012 Courses: Identity and Criminality, Civil Rights and Prisons, Innocence Clinic CLERKSHIPS The Honorable Martha Craig Daughtrey, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 2007 – 2008 The Honorable Chief Judge James G. -
A Bright Economic Future for the Mountain State
SERIES TITLE A Bright Economic Future for the Mountain State Economic diversification Jeremy Richardson in West Virginia November 2013 The transition to a clean energy economy is a frighten- ing prospect for states and communities firmly rooted in the fossil fuel economy. Partly as a result, debate about our nation’s energy policy has become toxic in West Virginia and the broader Appalachian region. Discussions of environmental concerns—whether related to importance of coal to West Virginia, and analyzed the economic mountaintop removal, hydraulic fracturing, or climate change— importance of future coal production for the state and the tend to send people to opposing corners, with neither side willing potential to diversify its economy. to budge, or even to engage in civil discourse. And parties too often Even in the heart of coal country, people recognize that focus on the tension between job growth and environmental things are changing. I believe that by concentrating on the protection, assuming that the two are mutually exclusive. opportunities that lie ahead—and by directly addressing the As the son and brother of West Virginia coal miners, I see a challenges we face—we can ensure a vibrant future for desperate need and a timely opportunity for a more constructive generations of West Virginians to come. conversation. This report summarizes a meeting that represents the culmination of a 21-month research project I completed for Jeremy Richardson the Union of Concerned Scientists through its Kendall Science Senior energy analyst Fellowship. In my research, I studied the cultural and historical Union of Concerned Scientists If coal is King, he hasn’t taken very good care of his subjects. -
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
No. ________ In the Supreme Court of the United States MITCH CARMICHAEL, President of the West Virginia Senate, DONNA J. BOLEY, President Pro Tempore of the West Virginia Senate, TOM TAKUBO, West Virginia Senate Majority Leader, LEE CASSIS, Clerk of the West Virginia Senate, and the WEST VIRGINIA SENATE, Petitioners, v. West Virginia ex. rel. MARGARET L. WORKMAN, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI PATRICK MORRISEY LINDSAY S. SEE Attorney General Solicitor General OFFICE OF THE Counsel of Record WEST VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL ZACHARY A. VIGLIANCO State Capitol Complex Assistant Attorney Building 1, Room E-26 General Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 558-2021 Counsel for Petitioners QUESTIONS PRESENTED In a decision that brought pending state impeachment proceedings to a halt, a panel of acting justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia inserted itself into both the substance and procedure of a process that the West Virginia Constitution entrusts exclusively to the Legislative Branch. In its opinion, the court refused to grant relief under the “Guarantee Clause” of Article IV, § 4 of the United States Constitution, which promises that “[t]he United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,” because it deemed Guarantee Clause challenges to be nonjusticiable political questions. The questions presented are: 1) Whether Guarantee Clause claims are judicially cognizable? 2) Whether a state judiciary’s intrusion into the impeachment process represents so grave a violation of the doctrine of separation of powers as to undermine the essential components of a republican form of government? ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTIONS PRESENTED ...................................... -
Attorney Discipline Decisions
4/9/2019 Omaha Bar Association and Creighton University School of Law 13th Annual Seminar on Ethics and Professionalism April 5, 2019 J. Scott Paul McGrath North Mullin & Kratz PC LLO Omaha, Nebraska Attorney Discipline Decisions 1 1 4/9/2019 State ex. rel. Counsel for Discipline v. Trembly, 300 Neb 195 (2018) • The only question for the Supreme Court was the appropriate sanction. • Felony conviction for false individual tax return. 2 Facts • The failure to report on tax return over $1 million from both law related and non- law related activity. 3 2 4/9/2019 • Per Curiam Opinion • No bright-line rule that a felony conviction creates a presumption in favor of disbarment, as it has for acts of misappropriating trust account funds. • Lawyer argued underlying conduct – not felony conviction, should be focal point. 4 • “There should be no question that a knowing failure to file tax returns and to pay taxes is a serious violation of the ethical obligations of an attorney. • “Failure to file a tax return is a crime of moral turpitude which is prohibited by Neb. S. Ct. Rule Section 3-508.4.” 5 3 4/9/2019 Mitigating Factors • Letters were submitted to the Referee as evidence of lawyer’s good character and honesty. • However, these letters were not mentioned in the Referee’s report. 6 Failure to note exception: • Lawyer did not take exception to the findings of fact in the Referee’s report • Because there was no exceptions made to the Referee’s findings of fact, the Supreme Court may consider the Referee’s findings final and conclusive. -
Post Audit Division
JOINT COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT AND FINANCE WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR POST AUDIT DIVISION LEGISLATIVE AUDIT REPORT SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA REPORT SUMMARY 1. Some Justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Used State Vehicles and Rental Cars Paid for by the State for Personal Use, While Ignoring Federal Law for Taxable Fringe Benefits. 2. Supreme Court Justice Ketchum has Repaid the State $1,663.81 for Incorrect Travel Reimbursements. 3. Personal Use of State Vehicles and an Antique Desk May Violate the Ethics Act’s Provision Prohibiting the Use of Public Office for Private Gain. 4. The Supreme Court Does Not Comply With §17A-3- 23(a) Which Requires a License Plate on the Front of State Vehicles. Legislative Auditor: Aaron Allred Post Audit Director: Denny Rhodes GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS STATEMENT We conducted this performance audit in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. POST AUDIT DIVISION Director, Denny Rhodes JOINT COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT AND FINANCE WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR POST AUDIT DIVISION POST AUDITS SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS SENATE MEMBERS HOUSE MEMBERS President, Mitch Carmichael Tim Armstead, Speaker Ed Gaunch Timothy Miley Roman Prezioso Eric Nelson Jr. APRIL 16, 2018 LEGISLATIVE AUDIT REPORT SUPREME COURT of INTRODUCTION: PAGE 1 ISSUE 1: PAGE 2 Some Justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals APPEALS of WEST VIRGINIA of West Virginia Used State Vehicles and Rental Cars Paid for by the State for Personal Use, While Ignoring Federal Law for Taxable Fringe LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR’S STAFF CONTRIBUTORS Benefits. -
Underthedome
UNDER the DOME FEBRUARY 1, 2016 Welcome Under the Dome is an update on actions and activities of the West Virginia Legislature, provided during the regular legislative session and interim sessions for West Virginia University faculty and staff by WVU’s Office of State, Corporate and Local Relations. This issue provides a review of legislation critical to WVU, Higher Education Day at the Capitol, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Day at the Capitol, the budget, legislative activity and vacancies and appointments. Protecting WVU Tech A bipartisan group of House and Senate members have introduced two bills to ensure the continued viability of WVU Tech. HB 4310 (sponsored by Delegates John O’Neal, Bill Anderson, Lynne Arvon, Mick Bates, Paul Espinosa, Barbara Fleischauer, Cindy Frich, Brian Kurcaba, Tim Miley, Eric Nelson and Joe Statler) was introduced last Wednesday. A companion bill, SB 386 (sponsored by Senators Jeff Mullins, Bob Beach, Craig Blair, Ed Gaunch, Mike Hall, Jeff Kessler, Roman Prezioso, Charles Trump and Bob Williams), was introduced Monday. WVU Extension Service SB 403, Relating to Cooperative Extension Workers, was introduced Wednesday by Senators Kent Leonhardt and Bob Williams. This bill seeks to amend §19-8-1 of the West Virginia Code. Current code was written in the 1960s, and this legislation updates code to reflect the current organizational function of WVU Extension Service agents. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Day at the Capitol Last Wednesday, the Legislature welcomed participants of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Day to the Capitol. The event, sponsored by TechConnect West Virginia and the TransTech Research and Business Development program, is a showcase of groups and companies that are working to advance innovation and entrepreneurship across West Virginia. -
MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY West Virginia Legislature
1st Session of the 79th Legislature of West Virginia MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY West Virginia Legislature West Virginia Legislature’s Office of Reference & Information Room-MB-27, Building 1, State Capitol Complex, Charleston, WV 25305 phone: (304) 347-4836 | http://www.legis.state.wv.us | fax: (304) 347-4901 09 Contents The West Virginia Legislature’s Membership Directory features House and Senate District Maps with membership listings by district and the 2009 Legislative Calendar. Introduction p. 3 Senate President p. 4 Senate Lawmakers p. 5-13 Senate Committees p. 14-16 Senate District Map p. 17 House Speaker p. 18 House Lawmakers p. 19-43 House Committees p. 44-47 House District Map p. 48-49 Legislative Calendar p. 50 Committee Abbreviations p. 51 Contact Information p. 52 The 79th Legislature of West Virginia - 2009 Under the provisions of the West Virginia Constitution, the Legislature is the lawmaking branch of state government. Legislators are elected by the people to serve as their representative voice in government. The West Virginia Legislature is a citizen legislature -- meaning the members are not full-time legislators, but ordinary citizens who hold other jobs when the Legislature is not meeting. Because the Legislature is comprised of two bodies, the Senate and the House of Delegates, it is called “bicameral.” The Legislative Oath of Office “I do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the State of West Virginia, and faithfully discharge the duties of Senator (or Delegate) according to the best of my ability. I will not accept nor receive, directly nor indirectly, any money or other valuable thing from any corporation, company or person for any vote or influence I may give or withhold, as Senator (or Delegate) on any bill, resolution or appropriation, or for any act I may do or perform as Senator (or Delegate).” 2009 Membership Directory p.