Chapter 2--Area Description and Resources

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 2--Area Description and Resources Chapter 2—Area Description and Resources © Keith Penner Yellow-headed Blackbird when the previously deformed Precambrian (over 570 Physical Environment million years old) and Paleozoic (570–240 million years old) rocks were slowly uplifted and broken into huge The physical environment comprises the geology, fault blocks by extensional stresses that still continue soils, hydrology, and climate of the Bear River water- to stretch the earth’s crust (Milligan 2000). shed. In addition, climate change is discussed. Sediments shed from the ranges are slowly filling the intervening wide, flat basins. Many of the basins have been further modified by shorelines and sed- Geology and Soils iments of lakes that intermittently cover the valley floors. The most notable of these was Lake Bonn- The Bear River basin encompasses two physio- eville, which reached its deepest level about 15,000 graphic provinces: The Basin and Range Province and years ago when it flooded basins across western Utah the Middle Rocky Mountain Province of the Rocky (Milligan 2000). Mountain Section (Dion 1969). The Basin and Range The Middle Rocky Mountains Province, which Province is noted for many north–south oriented, encompasses approximately the eastern two-thirds fault-tilted mountain ranges separated by interven- of the basin, consists of mountainous terrain, stream ing broad, sediment-filled basins. Approximately valleys, and alluvial basins. The Utah part of this the western one-third of the watershed lies within province has two major mountain ranges, the north– the Basin and Range Province, which began forming south trending Wasatch and east–west trending 10 Land Protection Plan—Bear River Watershed Conservation Area; Idaho, Utah, Wyoming Uinta Mountains. Both ranges have cores of old Pre- vary in elevation from 7,500 to 13,500 feet and are cambrian rocks, some more than 2.6 billion years old unusual in that they run in an east to west orien- (Milligan 2000). This Precambrian bedrock became tation. From the headwaters, the Bear River flows exposed during the Pleistocene by glacial activity north and west in an arc from Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, that created smooth bowls that collect and funnel and back into Utah. Near the city of Evanston, Wyo- water down the Bear River (Denton 2007). ming, the topography flattens and land use becomes The Bear River Range, located in the central a mix of urban and agricultural uses. Here the river part of the Bear River watershed, is aligned north begins a dramatic transformation from fast-flow- to south and divides the eastern Mesozoic and west- ing, cold, and clear water in the narrow valleys to a ern Cenozoic zones. From the Uinta Mountains in the slow-moving, cool-water, meandering course on the eastern part of the watershed, the Bear River flows valley floor. Humans have altered the natural stream northward along the edge of a Mesozoic region, char- dynamics throughout the remaining course of the acterized by rock structures that have little ability to Bear River to its termination at the Great Salt Lake. absorb water. The western part of the watershed is Although agriculture accounts for only 7 percent of comprised primarily of Paleozoic rock in the moun- the land use in the upper watershed, it accounts for tains and Cenozoic rock in the valleys. The valleys more than 80 percent of the water usage. Surface and here contain alluvial and glacial deposits that are ground water sources are used to irrigate more than absorptive and lend well to agricultural use (Haws 96,512 acres of hay, pasture, and cropland (Bear River and Hughes 1973). The Bear River range is an impor- Watershed Information System 2009). tant catch basin for precipitation. Instream structures like the Chapman Canal The watershed contains multiple mountain ranges Diversion and Woodruff Narrows Reservoir dis- including the Wasatch Front to the west, the Bear rupt natural channel-forming flows and sediment River Divide (Crawford) and Tunp Ranges to the transport, leading to streambed and bank instability east, and the Sublette Range to the north (see fig- downstream. After passing through Woodruff Nar- ure 3). The convergence of mountain ranges at Rocky rows Reservoir, the valley broadens and the river Point about 1 mile northeast of Cokeville creates a travels along the Wyoming–Utah border and lends pinch-point for one of the regionally important migra- itself to irrigation and production agriculture for 30 tion corridors in the watershed. The position and miles before reentering Wyoming near Sage Junc- alignment of the various ranges across the watershed tion. Nutrient loading (especially phosphorus, which play a central role in precipitation, climatic, hydrolog- is found at naturally high levels in surrounding soil ical, and biological patterns. formations), sediment from accelerated bank erosion, and dewatering are leading causes of stream degra- dation. Sediment and nutrient levels remain as the Hydrology main water quality concerns throughout the entire Bear River watershed, and those impacts contribute The Bear River is the largest tributary to the to water management challenges in the refuges (Utah Great Salt Lake, the remnant of ancient Lake Bonn- Division of Water Resources 2002). eville. Lake Bonneville was a closed inland sea basin As the river flows north from Evanston, the ridge the size of Lake Michigan that once dominated the and swale topography of the floodplain is character- landscape in Idaho, Nevada, and Utah. Approxi- ized by a complex association of irrigated meadows, mately 16,000 years ago, Lake Bonneville began wetlands, and grass uplands that support one of the spilling over into the Snake River drainage at Red highest densities of migrating and nesting waterfowl Rock Pass, reducing the lake level by 375 feet. Over in Wyoming. Centered along a 20-mile stretch of the the following 8,000 years, Lake Bonneville contin- Bear River and its associated wetlands and uplands, ued to shrink because of changing climatic conditions, Cokeville Meadows National Wildlife Refuge was eventually occupying only the present day Great Salt established in 1992 to protect this important habitat. Lake (Utah Geological Survey). After leaving Cokeville, the Bear River crosses The Bear River watershed is unusual in that it into Idaho near the community of Border, where the is entirely enclosed by mountains, forming one arm flow is greatly increased by inflow from the Smith’s of the Great Salt Lake basin, which has no natural Fork River, which originates in the Bridger–Teton drainage outlets. Three States share drainage in the National Forest and has a relatively intact water- 7,500 square-mile watershed: 2,700 square miles in shed and native fish assemblages (Wyoming Game Idaho, 3,300 square miles in Utah, and 1,500 square and Fish Department 2010). miles in Wyoming. Progressions of small, high-moun- As the Bear River passes into Idaho, Pacifi- tain streams form the headwaters of the Bear River Corp diverts water at Stewart Dam through Bear in Utah’s Uinta–Wasatch–Cache National Forest. The Lake National Wildlife Refuge and into Bear Lake Uinta Mountains, a subrange of the Rocky Mountains, proper (which straddles Idaho and Utah). Bear Lake Chapter 2—Area Description and Resources 11 Figure 3. Vicinity map for the Bear River Watershed Conservation Area in Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming. 12 Land Protection Plan—Bear River Watershed Conservation Area; Idaho, Utah, Wyoming National Wildlife Refuge, near Montpelier, Idaho, was established in 1968 to protect and manage habitat for Climate waterfowl and other migratory birds. Once released from Bear Lake proper, water travels from the Out- The climate of most of the Bear River Water- let Canal and the refuge’s Mud Lake unit back to shed Conservation Area is characterized as having the Bear River’s original channel about 7 miles from warm to hot summers and cold winters and is clas- where the water is first diverted. Except for some sified as humid continental, mild summer under the water seepage from Stewart Dam, all Bear River Koppen climate classification system. The remainder water is diverted through the refuge; however, small of the watershed near the Great Salt Lake is classi- creeks and irrigation return water enter into the orig- fied as semiarid desert–steppe or humid continental, inal river channel so that the river is not completely hot summer for the Great Basin and Wasatch Front, dewatered between Stewart Dam and its reunion respectively. with the Outlet Canal. Annual precipitation is influenced greatly by the From Bear Lake, the river travels 100 miles to the topography and elevations found within the water- north, where it is impounded in the Alexander Res- shed, which range from 4,200 to 13,000 feet. Annual ervoir for irrigation, recreation, and hydroelectric precipitation ranges from 10 inches in the lower val- power generation. Below the Alexander Dam, about leys to 65 inches at the headwaters of the Bear River one-tenth of the river’s annual flow is sent through in the Uinta Mountains (Utah Division of Water one of the oldest diversion canals in the watershed, Resources 2005b). Two major storm patterns influ- the Last Chance Canal. The canal was constructed ence precipitation in the basin: (1) frontal systems by settlers to provide irrigation for agriculture in the from the Pacific Northwest during winter and spring; early 1900s. From there, the river continues south and (2) thunderstorms from the south and southwest toward Grace, Idaho. Just above the Black Can- in late summer and early fall. yon, almost all the river water is again diverted, at Temperatures are also variable throughout the the Grace Dam, through an aqueduct to the Grace watershed because of differences in elevation. Mean Power Plant for power production. The water then is annual temperatures range from 37 °F in the Uinta returned to its original river channel just below Black Mountains at about 8,400 feet elevation to 53 °F at Canyon at Cove Dam.
Recommended publications
  • The Wasatch Fault
    The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault UtahUtah Geological Geological Survey Survey PublicPublic Information Information Series Series 40 40 11 9 9 9 9 6 6 The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault CONTENTS The ups and downs of the Wasatch fault . .1 What is the Wasatch fault? . .1 Where is the Wasatch fault? Globally ............................................................................................2 Regionally . .2 Locally .............................................................................................4 Surface expressions (how to recognize the fault) . .5 Land use - your fault? . .8 At a glance - geological relationships . .10 Earthquakes ..........................................................................................12 When/how often? . .14 Howbig? .........................................................................................15 Earthquake hazards . .15 Future probability of the "big one" . .16 Where to get additional information . .17 Selected bibliography . .17 Acknowledgments Text by Sandra N. Eldredge. Design and graphics by Vicky Clarke. Special thanks to: Walter Arabasz of the University of Utah Seismograph Stations for per- mission to reproduce photographs on p. 6, 9, II; Utah State University for permission to use the satellite image mosaic on the cover; Rebecca Hylland for her assistance; Gary Christenson, Kimm Harty, William Lund, Edith (Deedee) O'Brien, and Christine Wilkerson for their reviews; and James Parker for drafting. Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department
    [Show full text]
  • Final Biological Assessment
    REVISED BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Effects of the Modified Idaho Roadless Rule on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species for Terrestrial Wildlife, Aquatics, and Plants September 12, 2008 FINAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Effects of the Modified Idaho Roadless Rule on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species for Terrestrial Wildlife, Aquatics, and Plants Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL ACTION .................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need..................................................................................................................................3 Description of the Project Area...............................................................................................................4 Modified Idaho Roadless Rule................................................................................................................6 Wild Land Recreation (WLR)...............................................................................................................6 Primitive (PRIM) and Special Areas of Historic and Tribal Significance (SAHTS)..............................7 Backcountry/ Restoration (Backcountry) (BCR)................................................................................10 General Forest, Rangeland,
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Northern Part of Wellsville Mountain, Northern Wasatch Range, Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1958 Geology of the Northern Part of Wellsville Mountain, Northern Wasatch Range, Utah Stanley S. Beus Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Beus, Stanley S., "Geology of the Northern Part of Wellsville Mountain, Northern Wasatch Range, Utah" (1958). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 4430. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/4430 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOWGY OF THE NORTHERN PART OF WELLSVILLE MJUNTAIN, NORTHERN WASATCH RANGE, UTAH - by Stanley S. Beus A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1958 ACKNO I\ LEDGMENT I am grateful to Dr . J. Stewa rt Ni lli ama, Dr. Clyde T. Hardy , and Professor Dona ld R. Olsen for the as sista nce in field work and for their suggestions concerning the wr iting of this manuscript. Stanley S . Be us II TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa ge Introduction 1 Purpose a nd s cope 1 Location a nd extent of area 1 Physiography 2 Field work 11 5 Previous i nvestigati ons 6 Str a tigr aphy 8 Pr e - Ca mbrian r ocks 8 Cambri an system 9 Bri gham quart zi te 10 La ngs ton forma tion 11 Ute f orma tion 13 Bla cksmith for mation 14 Bloomington f or ma t ion 16 Nounan f orma tion 17 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Meeting Packet
    PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE Nevada Land Management Task Force (Established Pursuant to Assembly Bill 227 enacted in the 2013 Legislative Session) August 16, 2013, 1:00 p.m. Eureka Opera House 31 S. Main St. Eureka, NV 89316 AGENDA Some Task Force members may attend via telephone from other locations. Items on the agenda may be taken out of order. The Task Force may combine two or more agenda items for consideration. The Task Force may remove an item from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item on the agenda at any time. Call to Order, Roll Call 1. Public Comment. Please Limit Comments to 3 Minutes 2. Approval of Agenda. For Possible Action. 3. Approval of the Minutes of the June 28, 2013 Meeting of the Nevada Land Management Task Force. For Possible Action. (Attachment) 4. Overview of Legislation in Other Western States Regarding the Transfer of Public Lands. 5. Presentation on Studies Commissioned by Eureka County in 1994 and 1996 on Public Lands Transfer Issues. 6. Initial Discussion on Potential Lands to be Included in a Transfer of Public Lands from the Federal Government to Nevada. (Attachment) 7. Initial Discussion of Cost and Revenue Implications of the Transfer of Public Lands to Nevada. (Attachment) 8. Initial Discussion on Transferring Multiple Uses, Including but not Limited to Outdoor Recreation, Mining and Prospecting, Timber, Grazing, and Fish and Wildlife Purposes, with the Transfer of Public Lands. 9. Initial Discussion on Which Public Lands, if Transferred to State Ownership, Should be Sold or Exchanged into the Private Sector and How Should the Sales Take Place? 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Cache Valley
    C a c h e V a l l e y V i s i t o r s B u r e a u Cache Valley HERITAGE DRIVING TOUR CACHE VALLEY driving tour Cache Valley extends more than 50 miles into the states of Utah and Idaho. Beautifully nestled among the steep slopes of the Bear River and Wellsville mountain ranges, the valley averages 4500 feet in elevation and is four to twelve miles in width. The surrounding high mountains, clear streams and productive soil all combine to make it a valley rich in the blessings of nature. Cache Valley was the scene of many events important in the settling of the American West. It was here that mountain Indian tribes found ample hunting ground for game, that rugged mountain men splashed through streams in search of beaver, and where Mormon pioneers built new homes in the wilderness of the American frontier. For centuries before the mountain men and the Mormons came to Cache Valley, Native Americans hunted, fished and gathered seeds from the grass that was plentiful upon the valley floor. These Native Americans, the Northwestern Shoshone, named the valley Seuhubeogoi, “Willow River,” and established both winter and summer camps along the major rivers. As nomadic hunters and gatherers they followed centuries-old migratory patterns in search of food. Famous Northwestern Shoshone leaders were Sagwitch, Bear Hunter, Pocatello, Pahvants, and Sanpitch. Mountain men in search of beaver were the first white visitors to Cache Valley. During the years of the Rocky Mountain fur General Merchandise Store, built 1879 Cover photo: American West Heritage Center All photos: USU Special Collections 2 trade, the valley was a crossroad and campground for almost every mountain man who ever fought, trapped or traded in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • References a - B
    References A - B References BIBLIOGRAPHY Addley, Craig, Bethany Neilson, Leon Basdekas, and Thomas Hardy. 2005. Virgin River Temperature Model Validation (Draft). Institute for Natural Systems Engineering, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, UT: Utah State University. Alder, Douglas D., and Karl F. Brooks. 1996. A History of Washington County: From Isolation to Destination. Salt Lake City, Utah: Utah State Historical Society. Aliison, James R. 2000. “Craft Specialization and Exchange in Small-Scale Societies: A Virgin Anasazi Case Study.” Unpublished PhD diss., Arizona State University. Allison, James R. 1990. “Anasazi Subsistence in the St. George Basin, Southwestern Utah.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Brigham Young University. Altschul, J. H., and H. C. Fairley. 1989. Man, Models, and Management: An Overview of the Arizona Strip and the Management of its Cultural Resources. St. George, UT: U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management. Arizona-Sonoran Desert Museum. 2015. “Western Banded Gecko.” Accessed February. http.//www.desertmuseum. org/books/nhsd_banded-gecko.php. Audubon. 2015. “Ferruginous Hawk.” Accessed February. http://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/ ferruginous-hawk. Audubon. 2015. “Burrowing Owl.” Accessed February. http://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/burrowing-owl. Audubon and Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 2013. “Range and Point Map.” Accessed November. http://www.ebird.org/ content/ebird/html. Brennan, Thomas C. 2014. “Online Field Guide to The Reptiles and Amphibians of Arizona.” Accesed October 23. http://www.retilesofaz.org/html. Bernales, Heather H., Justin Dolling, and Kevin Bunnel. 2009. Utah Cougar Annual Report 2009. Salt Lake City: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Bernales, Heather H., Justin Dolling, and Kevin Bunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Linguistic Competence Coordinators' Network for State And
    Cultural and Linguistic Competence Coordinators’ Network for State and Territorial Mental Health Services (State CLC Network) March 2017 Maintained by the Georgetown University Center for Child and Human Development with the cooperation and support of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Updates and Corrections? Contact Sherry Peters at [email protected] . ALABAMA Ginny Rountree Assistant Director Sarah Harkless Division of Health Care Management Director of Development Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Mental Health/Substance Abuse Services Division 701 Jefferson Street Alabama Department of Mental Health Phoenix, Arizona 85034 100 North Union Street, Suite 430 P. 602-417-4122 Montgomery, AL 36104 F. 602-256-6756 P: 334-242-3953 [email protected] F: 334-242-0759 [email protected] ARKANSAS Steve Hamerdinger Director, Office of Deaf Services FreEtta Hemphill Division of Mental Illness and Substance Abuse Special Projects Clinician Services Division of Behavioral Health Services Alabama Department of Mental Health 4800 West 7th Street PO Box 301410 Little Rock, AR 72205 Montgomery, AL 36130 P: 501-658-6803 P: 334-239-3558 (VP or Voice) [email protected] Text: 334-652-3783 [email protected] CALIFORNIA ALASKA Marina Castillo-Augusto, M.S. Counseling Staff Services Manager Terry Hamm California Department of Public Health Tribal Liaison Office of Health Equity Division of Behavioral Health 1615 Capitol Avenue Department of Health and Social Services PO Box 997377, MS 0022 3601 C Street Sacramento, CA 95899-7377 Suite 878 P: 916-445-8347 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 [email protected] P: 907- 269-7826 F: 907-269-3623 Monika Grass [email protected] SSMI/Chief Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) Mental Health Services Division Quality Assurance Unit (72.2.57) Suite 230, MS 2702 AMERICAN SAMOA 1500 Capitol Avenue Sacramento, CA 95814 P: 916-319-8525 ARIZONA [email protected] Wm.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverines in Idaho 2014–2019
    Management Plan for the Conservation of Wolverines in Idaho 2014–2019 Prepared by IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME July 2014 2 Idaho Department of Fish & Game Recommended Citation: Idaho Department of Fish and Game. 2014. Management plan for the conservation of wolverines in Idaho. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, USA. Idaho Department of Fish and Game – Wolverine Planning Team: Becky Abel – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Southeast Region Bryan Aber – Regional Wildlife Biologist, Upper Snake Region Scott Bergen PhD – Senior Wildlife Research Biologist, Statewide, Pocatello William Bosworth – Regional Wildlife Biologist, Southwest Region Rob Cavallaro – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Upper Snake Region Rita D Dixon PhD – State Wildlife Action Plan Coordinator, Headquarters Diane Evans Mack – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, McCall Subregion Sonya J Knetter – Wildlife Diversity Program GIS Analyst, Headquarters Zach Lockyer – Regional Wildlife Biologist, Southeast Region Michael Lucid – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Panhandle Region Joel Sauder PhD – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Clearwater Region Ben Studer – Web and Digital Communications Lead, Headquarters Leona K Svancara PhD – Spatial Ecology Program Lead, Headquarters Beth Waterbury – Team Leader & Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Salmon Region Craig White PhD – Regional Wildlife Manager, Southwest Region Ross Winton – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Magic Valley Region Additional copies: Additional copies can be downloaded from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game website at fishandgame.idaho.gov/wolverine-conservation-plan Front Cover Photo: Composite photo: Wolverine photo by AYImages; background photo of the Beaverhead Mountains, Lemhi County, Idaho by Rob Spence, Greater Yellowstone Wolverine Program, Wildlife conservation Society. Back Cover Photo: Release of Wolverine F4, a study animal from the Central Idaho Winter Recreation/Wolverine Project, from a live trap north of McCall, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Fish Recovery Efforts in the State of Wyoming
    Endangered Fish Recovery Efforts by the State of Wyoming Pete Cavalli Endangered Species Lived in the Upper Green River… Illustrations by Joseph Tomelleri Pikeminnow near Flaming Gorge Dam …Until It was Poisoned and Dammed Rotenone Application: over 200 miles upstream of Flaming Gorge Dam Big Sandy area Little Hole area So, Why is Wyoming Involved? • The purpose of the Recovery Program is to recover the endangered fishes while water development proceeds in compliance with all applicable Federal and State laws. • The Program provides Endangered Species Act compliance for federal, tribal, state, and private water projects throughout the Colorado River Basin above Lake Powell. >119,000 af/year covered in Wyoming How is Wyoming Involved? Active Participant in UCREFRP Represented on all committees Follow NNF Stocking Procedures, Basin-wide Strategy, etc. Contributed $2,709,100 through FY 2016 UCREFRP Recovery Elements Research and Monitoring : Species Extirpated In WY Habitat Development: Species Extirpated in WY Stocking Endangered Fish: Suitable Habitat Inundated Habitat and Flow Management Nonnative Fish Management Information and Education Flow Management Instream Flow 130 segments >2% of stream miles in WY Many segments in the Green River basin Obtaining New Water Rights e.g., Pine Creek has direct flow and storage from both purchased rights and donated rights Other Mechanisms e.g., Pilot System Water Conservation Program Nonnative Fish Management: Burbot (aka ling, eelpout, etc.) Green River Drainage Green R. New Fork R. 2013 2006 Big Sandy 2007 R. 2007-09 2003 Fontenelle Res. Big Sandy 2005 2001 Res. Jim Bridger Pond 2004 Green R. 2003 2007 Bitter Native to Wind/Bighorn and 2015 Cr.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Manual
    Teacher’s Manual The goal of this manual is to assist teacher and student to better understand the his- tory of the Oregon/California Trail before your visit to The National Oregon/California Trail Center, especially as this information relates to Idaho's western heritage. 2009 Student Outreach Program Sponsors: All rights reserved by Oregon Trail Center, Inc. All pages may be reproduced for classroom instruction and not for commercial profit. Teacher's Resource Manual Table of Contents Quick Preview of The National Oregon/California Trail Center……………... Page 3, 4 History of Bear Lake Valley, Idaho……………………………………………... Page 5 Oregon Trail Timeline……………………………………………………………. Page 6 What Can I Take on the Trail?...................................................................... Page 7 How Much Will This Trip Cost?..................................................................... Page 7 Butch Cassidy and the Bank of Montpelier……………………………………. Page 8 Factoids and Idaho Trail Map…………………………………………… ……... Page 9 Bibliography of Oregon Trail Books (compiled by Bear Lake County Library)……………. Page 10-11 Fun Activities: Oregon Trail Timeline Crossword Puzzle (Relates to Page 5)……………… Page 12-14 Oregon Trail Word Search…………………………………………….………... Page 15-16 Web Site Resources: www.oregontrailcenter.org - The National Oregon/California Trail Center www.bearlake.org - Bear Lake Convention & Visitor's Bureau (accommodations) www.bearlakechamber.org - Greater Bear Lake Valley Chamber of Commerce www.bearlakecounty.info - County of Bear Lake, Idaho www.montpelieridaho.info - Montpelier, Idaho bearlake.lili.org - Bear Lake County Library 2 Quick Preview of . Clover Creek Encampment The Center actually sits on the very spot used as the historic Clover Creek Encampment. Travelers would camp overnight and some- times for days resting their animals, stocking up on food and water, and preparing for the next leg of the journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Cache County Regional Transportation Plan
    CacheRegional County, Transportation Utah Regional Transportation Plan 2040 June 2015 Mobility Economic Vitality Quality of Life CMPO Executive Council Chair: Todd Beutler, CVTD Transit Manager Vice Chair: Lloyd Berentzen, North Logan Mayor Don Calderwood, Providence County Executive Craig Buttars, Cache County Mayor Shaun Dustin, Nibley Mayor Bryan Cox, Hyde Park Wayne Barlow, Utah Transportation Commissioner Holly Daines, Logan City Council Mayor Craig Petersen, Logan Mayor Thomas Bailey, Wellsville Mayor Darrell Simmons, Smithfield Mayor Stephanie Miller, Hyrum Mayor Mike Johnson, Millville Mayor James Brackner, River Heights Cache Technical Advisory Committee Jim Gass, Smithfield Bill Young, Logan Randy Parks, Transit Josh Runhaar, Cache County Scarlet Bankhead, Providence David Zook, Nibley Ron Salvesen, Hyrum Cordell Batt, North Logan Reed Elder, Hyde Park Don Hartle, Wellsville Elden Bingham, UDOT Dave Adamson, UDOT Steve Call, FHWA Executive Director: James P. Gass Staff: Jeff Gilbert, Transportation Planner DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS chapter 1 – Overview & Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 5 2040 Background and regional information.............. 5 Cache Metropolitan Planning Organization .......... 5 Planning process .................................................... 5 Regional characteristics ......................................... 6 Transportation and Land Use ................................ 9 Development intensity
    [Show full text]