Deal of the Century” for Israel-Palestine US Proposals Are Likely to Speed Demise of Two-State Settlement Muriel Asseburg

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Deal of the Century” for Israel-Palestine US Proposals Are Likely to Speed Demise of Two-State Settlement Muriel Asseburg NO. 20 APRIL 2019 Introduction The “Deal of the Century” for Israel-Palestine US Proposals Are Likely to Speed Demise of Two-State Settlement Muriel Asseburg US President Donald Trump has announced a “deal of the century” to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The plan is to be revealed at an undetermined date some- time after the Israeli parliamentary elections. While the details remain a well-kept secret, the US Administration’s record to date suggests that the initiative will priori- tise Israeli interests over Palestinian rights, ignore fundamental principles of inter- national law, and steer well away from the idea of two sovereign states. The Palestinian leadership’s rejection must therefore be expected. The incoming Israeli government is likely to treat that as a green light to implement those elements of the plan that serve to maintain its permanent control over East Jerusalem and strategic areas of the West Bank. This course also risks breakdown of the already precarious Israeli-Pal- estinian cooperation on conflict management. The EU and its member states should take the publication of the US plan as an occasion to spell out the principles of the kind of conflict resolution that they could support, and state the consequences for European policy of Israeli annexation of parts of the West Bank. Trump was already proclaiming an “ulti- Palestinian entity, and security – Trump’s mate deal” to end the Israel-Palestine con- team appears to be focussing above all on flict during his presidential campaign in economic cooperation and development in 2016. Since he took office a trio composed the Palestinian territories. This would make of his son-in-law Jared Kushner, Jason the US plan largely a redux of Israeli Prime Greenblatt, long-time confidant and chief Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s preferred legal officer to Trump’s business empire, option of “economic peace”. That means and US ambassador to Israel David Fried- massive investment in the Palestinian econo- man have been working on such a plan. my as a substitute for self-determination with- The US State Department, however, has not in a sovereign state. The Arab Gulf states been involved. Alongside the so-called final and neighbouring Egypt and Jordan are status issues to be agreed between the two meant to play a special role in this scheme, parties to the conflict – Jerusalem, refu- providing it with a political umbrella and/ gees, settlements, status and borders of the or underpinning it with financial support. The overriding goal is to put together a Trump also recognised Israeli sovereignty coalition in which Israel cooperates closely over the Syrian Golan Heights occupied with Arab regional powers and the United in 1967. While not relating directly to the States against Iran. Recent years have already Palestinian territories, the move signals that witnessed a noticeable rapprochement be- the Trump Administration does not neces- tween Israel and the Arab Gulf states. Now sarily feel bound by the international law Israel and the United States want to remove principle outlawing acquisition of territory the Palestinian hurdle that has to date pre- by force. And the Israeli right interprets this vented a complete normalisation of rela- as green light for annexations in the West tions. Bank. In 2018 Washington also stopped fund- ing the United Nations Relief and Works Elements of the Deal Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). The United States had been Washington has revealed neither the ap- by far the largest contributor, covering proach nor the details of the “deal of the about one-third of UNRWA’s total budget in century”, which is supposed to serve as recent years. The background to this is that the basis for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. the Trump Administration shares the Israeli Yet, as far as the substance is concerned, government’s view that UNRWA perpetu- a number of inferences can be drawn ates the refugee problem by encouraging from the Administration’s actions and refugees to insist on their status and right pronouncements. The most basic of these of return rather than integrating within is that Trump refuses to unequivocally their current host states. According to press back a two-state settlement and refrains reports, Washington has also demanded from clearly condemning Israel’s settlement that Jordan strip Palestinians living there of policy in the occupied territories. US Am- refugee status and instead naturalise them. bassador Friedman makes no secret of his closeness to settler leaders. Washington has also ceased describing the Palestinian terri- Accelerating Erosion tories (and the Golan Heights) as “occu- pied”, for example in the US State Depart- Since Trump took office, Israelis and Pales- ment’s 2018 Human Rights Report. tinians have moved further away from a Moreover, President Trump has begun two-state settlement. Instead the one-state to question the international consensus on reality has become even more deeply en- final status issues (as laid out for example trenched: Israel enjoys overriding control of in UN Security Council Resolution 2334 of the entire region between the River Jordan December 2016). As Trump himself put it, and the Mediterranean, while the Palestin- he “took Jerusalem off the table”. While he ian Authority (PA) plays deputy sheriff. did note that recognition of Jerusalem as There have been no peace talks since April Israel’s capital did not prejudice a negotiated 2014. Backing by the Trump Administration agreement on the border between Israel and and a warming of relations with the Arab the Palestinians, all practical steps taken Gulf states have encouraged Netanyahu’s by the Americans point to an anticipated right-wing/national-religious coalition to outcome denying the Palestinians sover- expand settlement activity in the West eignty over central neighbourhoods of East Bank and Jerusalem, to open the way to Jerusalem: moving the US embassy to Jeru- annexation of settlements, to expand the salem, closing the consulate-general in East Jewish population share in Jerusalem and Jerusalem (which had mainly been re- to strengthen the Jewish identity of the sponsible for the Palestinians) and termi- state of Israel. These objectives were pur- nating financial support for Palestinian sued by a string of bills introduced to the institutions in the city. Knesset since 2017 (some of which have SWP Comment 20 April 2019 2 been placed on hold or overturned by the While US support for the Palestinian secu- High Court). In March 2017 Israel’s security rity forces was actually supposed to con- cabinet authorised – for the first time in tinue, the PA felt forced to reject it from twenty-five years – an entirely new settle- January 2019 in order to avoid risking pros- ment in the central West Bank. Represen- ecution under the US Anti-Terrorism Clarifi- tatives of the governing parties reject a sov- cation Act (ATCA). ereign Palestinian state and argue increas- In February the PA lost another signifi- ingly vehemently for annexation of Area C cant source of income. In the course of of the West Bank (about 60 percent by area) the election campaign the Israeli cabinet or even the entire West Bank. In the 2019 decided to apply the so-called Stern Law. election campaign Netanyahu also stated Under the motto “No pay for slay” this cuts his intention to expand Israeli sovereignty Israel’s transfer payments to the PA (an ele- to parts of the West Bank. ment of the 1994 Israeli-Palestinian Proto- In the absence of a perspective of conflict col on Economic Relations) by the amount resolution, Israeli-Palestinian cooperation paid by the PA during the previous year on conflict management has further eroded to Palestinians imprisoned in Israel (all in- over the last few years. Clashes over the discriminately labelled “terrorists”) and to Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif have fre- the families of “martyrs”. In response the quently escalated, requiring Jordanian PA refused to accept the reduced transfers. mediation to restore calm. More than 180 As a result, according to UN figures, it lacks Palestinians have been shot dead by Israeli about two thirds of its income. In the ab- soldiers since late March 2018, in the course sence of a rapid political solution to this of the “Great March of Return” protests at problem, this is likely to lead to the rapid the Gaza border fence; thousands more financial collapse of the PA. have been injured, many seriously. On the Other moderating institutions have been Israeli side incendiary kites and firebombs dismantled too. In January 2019 Netanyahu thrown over the border fence have caused decided to end the Temporary International material damage including destroying agri- Presence in Hebron (TIPH), an observer mis- cultural crops. Increasingly frequent rocket sion that had worked since 1994 – with and artillery exchanges between Israel and few interruptions – to deescalate between radical groups in Gaza have repeatedly Palestinians and radical settlers in the old brought the coastal strip to the verge of city. This is likely to accelerate the quarter’s war. While Egypt and the UN were able to transformation through settlement activity, mediate short-term ceasefires to calm the displacement of the Palestinian population situation and somewhat soften Gaza’s and emphasis of Jewish over Islamic cul- closure, a long-term ceasefire, security tural heritage. The level of violence has guarantees and the lifting of the blockade already increased noticeably since the mis- have proven unachievable. Consequently sion’s withdrawal. the humanitarian crisis in Gaza drags on. The process of erosion would accelerate still further if the Palestinian leadership Assessment and were to decide to implement the decisions Recommendations of the PLO Central Council, which has in recent years repeatedly voted to suspend The American “deal of the century” is un- security cooperation with Israel.
Recommended publications
  • Theda Skocpol
    NAMING THE PROBLEM What It Will Take to Counter Extremism and Engage Americans in the Fight against Global Warming Theda Skocpol Harvard University January 2013 Prepared for the Symposium on THE POLITICS OF AMERICA’S FIGHT AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING Co-sponsored by the Columbia School of Journalism and the Scholars Strategy Network February 14, 2013, 4-6 pm Tsai Auditorium, Harvard University CONTENTS Making Sense of the Cap and Trade Failure Beyond Easy Answers Did the Economic Downturn Do It? Did Obama Fail to Lead? An Anatomy of Two Reform Campaigns A Regulated Market Approach to Health Reform Harnessing Market Forces to Mitigate Global Warming New Investments in Coalition-Building and Political Capabilities HCAN on the Left Edge of the Possible Climate Reformers Invest in Insider Bargains and Media Ads Outflanked by Extremists The Roots of GOP Opposition Climate Change Denial The Pivotal Battle for Public Opinion in 2006 and 2007 The Tea Party Seals the Deal ii What Can Be Learned? Environmentalists Diagnose the Causes of Death Where Should Philanthropic Money Go? The Politics Next Time Yearning for an Easy Way New Kinds of Insider Deals? Are Market Forces Enough? What Kind of Politics? Using Policy Goals to Build a Broader Coalition The Challenge Named iii “I can’t work on a problem if I cannot name it.” The complaint was registered gently, almost as a musing after-thought at the end of a June 2012 interview I conducted by telephone with one of the nation’s prominent environmental leaders. My interlocutor had played a major role in efforts to get Congress to pass “cap and trade” legislation during 2009 and 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network Laura Osur Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Osur, Laura, "Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 448. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/448 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract When Netflix launched in April 1998, Internet video was in its infancy. Eighteen years later, Netflix has developed into the first truly global Internet TV network. Many books have been written about the five broadcast networks – NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, and the CW – and many about the major cable networks – HBO, CNN, MTV, Nickelodeon, just to name a few – and this is the fitting time to undertake a detailed analysis of how Netflix, as the preeminent Internet TV networks, has come to be. This book, then, combines historical, industrial, and textual analysis to investigate, contextualize, and historicize Netflix's development as an Internet TV network. The book is split into four chapters. The first explores the ways in which Netflix's development during its early years a DVD-by-mail company – 1998-2007, a period I am calling "Netflix as Rental Company" – lay the foundations for the company's future iterations and successes. During this period, Netflix adapted DVD distribution to the Internet, revolutionizing the way viewers receive, watch, and choose content, and built a brand reputation on consumer-centric innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission to Iran Seeks to Improve Relations Through Religious Dialogue
    Mission to Iran seeks to improve relations through religious dialogue WASHINGTON – A delegation of Christian and Muslim leaders returned to the United States from Iran hoping that their six-day visit will improve relations between the two squabbling countries in a way that diplomatic channels have not. The four-member delegation, which included Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick, retired archbishop of Washington, also hoped to be accompanied on the return home Sept. 19 by a pair of American hikers still being incarcerated by Iranian authorities on charges of espionage and entering Iran illegally, but was sidetracked because a judge who could approve their release was on vacation. Addressing reporters at Dulles International Airport outside of Washington upon the delegation’s return, Cardinal McCarrick said the release of Shane Bauer and Josh Fattal was imminent. He said he planned to call the mothers of the hikers as soon as he could get to a telephone to assure them that “their sons are on the way, so hang in there.” Bauer, 29, and Fattal, 29, began serving an eight-year prison sentence in August after being accused of being CIA agents and convicted of the charges in a trial. Negotiations with the Iranian judiciary for their release moved ahead as the delegation met Sept. 13-18 with Iranian religious and government leaders including President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The judge who could sign off on the deal was expected to return to work Sept. 20. A third hiker, Sarah Shourd, Bauer’s fiancée, also was arrested as the Americans hiked along the unmarked mountainous Iran-Iraq border July 31, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Who Do You Think You Are You're My Henry Allbones by G.B
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Who Do You Think You Are You're My Henry Allbones by G.B. Hope Is there a word or phrase for someone whose ominous remarks come true? I'm not looking for the word "clairvoyant" or any other related to parapsychology. The comments are not wishes, and the fact that they happen is just a coincidence. You might even tell this person: "Please, don't say anything about me. Your comments attract bad luck!" 3 Answers 3. Jinx. TFD n . 1. A person or thing that is believed to bring bad luck. 2. A condition or period of bad luck that appears to have been caused by a specific person or thing. tr.v. jinxed, jinx·ing, jinx·es To bring bad luck to . If a person is jinxed (adjective), it means that he or she always has bad luck. If you are experiencing a series of misfortunes, you can say that somebody has put a jinx on you. In the OP's examples the person speaking is "responsible" for causing the unfortunate incidents, hence she/he is a jinx (noun). If your sister gets a flat tire every single time you ride in her car, she may have good reason to accuse you of being a jinx , or a bringer of bad luck. When your bad luck makes you think there's a jinx on you, you believe that you're cursed. A bad omen — like a black cat — can be called a jinx, or the resulting bad fortune itself might be referred to that way.
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Robbery at Jennings Mini-Mart
    new new North Florida CYAN U U YELLOW MAGENTA Even Odd BLACK Daylight savings ends Ready for Don’t forget to fall back an hour on Sunday Homecoming? The Trojans take on The Villages Friday at 7:30 p.m. Classic cars on display during See pages 4-5B for more on inaugural Fall Festival, Page 2A the Homecoming festivities. n f l a o n l i n e . c o m Today’s Weather High 88° F The Precip: 30% A mix of clouds and sun with the chance of an isolated thunderstorm in the afternoon. Near record high tem- peratures. High 88F.Winds E at 5 to 10 mph. Chance of rain 30%. Jasper News For up to the minute weather go to www.nflaonline.com. 138TH YEAR, NUMBER 46 THURSDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2009 3 SECTIONS 32 PAGES 50¢ Biomass plant will bring jobs, officials say Staff biomass project in Hamilton millions of dollars into the “During the initial phases of construction Representatives from Duke County. ADAGE, a joint local economy, and bring a Energy, AREVA and ADAGE venture between AREVA and brand-new industry to and operation, this includes an estimated joined Hamilton County Duke Energy, is focused on Hamilton County,” said Sen. 700 direct and indirect jobs, including a residents and county converting clean renewable Charlie Dean (R-Inverness), combination of permanent on-site and representatives Tuesday to resources into electricity. who participated in the field jobs, shorter-term construction jobs, discuss job creation and local “This renewable energy discussion and serves on the economic development facility will create much- and over 220 indirect or induced jobs through ADAGE’s planned needed new jobs, inject SEE BIOMASS, PAGE 2A across the Hamilton County economy.” - Hamilton County Development Authority Director Charles Williams All about Armed robbery at Jennings Mini-Mart By Stephenie night at 8:30pm by two HalloweenHalloweenPage 6B Livingston masked men, one dressed stephenie.livingston in black and the other @gaflnews.com wearing a pink shirt.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump's Foreign Policies Are Better Than They Seem
    Council Special Report No. 84 April 2019 Trump’s Foreign Policies Are Better Than They Seem Robert D. Blackwill The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with Council members to discuss and debate major international issues; supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to-date information and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org. The Council on Foreign Relations takes no institutional positions on policy issues and has no affiliation with the U.S. government. All views expressed in its publications and on its website are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wellington Experience: a Study of Attitudes and Values Within the Indian Army
    ASIA THE WELLINGTON EXPERIENCE A Study of Attitudes and Values Within the Indian Army BY DAVID O. SMITH COLONEL, UNITED STATES ARMY (RETIRED) South Asia Program THE WELLINGTON EXPERIENCE A Study of Attitudes and Values Within the Indian Army BY DAVID O. SMITH COLONEL, UNITED STATES ARMY (RETIRED) SEPTEMBER 2020 DAVID O. SMITH © Copyright 2020 by the Stimson Center. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Control Number: 2020916965 ISBN: 978-0-9997659-1-3 Visit www.stimson.org for more information about Stimson. Cover photo: Bumble Dee / Alamy Stock Photo 2 THE WELLINGTON EXPERIENCE: A STUDY OF ATTITUDES AND VALUES WITHIN THE INDIAN ARMY Contents Preface ...............................................................6 Author's Note..........................................................7 Author’s Biography .................................................... 12 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................13 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY ............................................. 16 METHODOLOGY ..................................................... 21 BACKGROUND OF THE U.S.-INDIA RELATIONSHIP ...................... 25 THE DEFENCE SERVICES STAFF COLLEGE.............................. 33 History and Significance ........................................... 33 Mission and Objectives ............................................ 35 Organization, Senior Officers, Faculty, and Students...................36 Curriculum ......................................................38 Evaluation of
    [Show full text]
  • The American Way of Irregular War: an Analytical Memoir It Took Action by Congress and the Support of the President to Drive the Reforms That We Needed
    C O R P O R A T I O N The AMERICAN WAY of IRREGULAR WAR An Analytical Memoir CHARLES T. CLEVELAND WITH DANIEL EGEL For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/PEA301-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9974-0544-9 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover design by Rick Penn-Kraus; image from ArtCore/AdobeStock Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface American irregular warfare is the United States’ unique, and in recent times troubled, approach to conflict in which armed civilian or para- military forces, and not regular armies, are the primary combatants.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Doran Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute Before the Committee On
    Prepared statement by: Michael Doran Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute Before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform United States House of Representatives May 17, 2016 White House Narratives on the Iran Nuclear Deal Chairman Chaffetz, Ranking Member Cummings, members of the Committee, thank you for inviting me to address some of the problems raised by the recent profile in The New York Times Magazine of Ben Rhodes, the deputy national security advisor for strategic communication. Rhodes and key members of his staff openly admitted to David Samuels, the author of the article, that they built a campaign-style war room manned by approximately two-dozen staffers drawn from the State Department, Treasury, and the Department of Defense. The war room monitored the discussion of the Iran nuclear deal— in the traditional press, on social media, in Congress, and in the policy world—and supplied sympathetic reporters with stories, official and unofficial, that supported the goals of the Obama administration. Simultaneously, Rhodes built up a network of surrogates among NGOs and think tanks who provided the media with seemingly independent verification of those stories. “We created an echo chamber,” Rhodes said. “They were saying things that validated what we had given them to say.”1 Rhodes reportedly bristled when Samuels suggested that the war room and echo chamber were tools of deception. In my view, however, Rhodes did indeed assist the president in deceiving the American people. In order to understand the precise nature of that deception, we must first describe the broad policy context in which the war room and echo chamber operated.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Nuclear Program and International
    IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW From Confrontation to Accord Daniel H. Joyner 1 1 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America. © Oxford University Press 2016 First Edition published in 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Joyner, Daniel, author. Title: Iran’s nuclear program and international law : from confrontation to accord / Daniel H. Joyner. Description: First edition. | New York : Oxford University Press, 2016. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016011939| ISBN 9780199377893 ((hardback) : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780190635718 ((pbk.) : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Nuclear nonproliferation—Iran. Classification: LCC KZ5770 .J698 2016 | DDC 341.7/340955—dc23 LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2016011939 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Paperback printed by WebCom, Inc., Canada Hardback printed by Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc., United States of America Note to Readers This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalyzing American Ingenuity: the Role of Government in Energy Innovation
    Catalyzing ameriCan ingenuity: the role of government in energy innovation Korea France India China US Japan // American Energy Innovation Council // CAtAlyzIng AmErican IngEnuIty: thE rolE of govErnmEnt In EnErgy InnovAtIon 2 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890 0.07 0.08 ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ percent Energy Sales as a Share of abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890 ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ R&D Spending abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890 ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890 Korea France India China US Japan 0.00 ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 percent as a Share of GDP R&D Spending // 3 Korea France India China US Japan // American Energy Innovation Council // CAtAlyzIng AmErican IngEnuIty: thE rolE of govErnmEnt In EnErgy InnovAtIon 4 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 About the AmericAn energy 0.04 innovAtion council 0.05 www.americanenergyinnovation.org 0.06 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890 0.07 Who we are 0.08 american energy innovation Council (AEIC) members are norm Augustine, ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ percent former chairman and chief executive officer of lockheed martin; ursula burns, chairman and chief executive officer of Xerox; John Doerr, partner at Kleiner gy Sales Ener Perkins; bill gates, chairman and former chief executive officer of microsoft; charles o. holliday, chairman of Bank of america and former chairman and chief executive officer of DuPont; Jeff immelt, chairman and chief executive e of as a Shar officer of GE; and tim
    [Show full text]
  • A Deal Too Far? Stephen Philip Cohen1 February 28, 2006
    A Deal Too Far? Stephen Philip Cohen1 February 28, 2006 On the eve of President George W. Bush’s visit to India and Pakistan, both sides are racing to complete the nuclear agreement announced in the July, 18, 2005 communiqué between Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh the time he reaches New Delhi on March 1, and there is a good chance that, as Stephen Hadley, Bush’s National Security Advisor noted in a press briefing, negotiations will continue. Informed observers on both sides claim that agreement can be reached before the end of 2006, and implemented over the next few years. The history and fate of this agreement will preoccupy journalists and scholars for months, if not years, to come. This note examines three of its aspects: • How did the two countries reach this point, and what are the politics of “the deal” in both countries? • What consequences might flow from its consummation or collapse? • Finally, “how much is enough?” Even though this is purportedly an agreement to allow India to acquire civilian nuclear technology, most attention has been focused upon its military and strategic implications. Origins The idea of a nuclear bargain, or “half-way house,” involving India’s civil and nuclear weapons programs is at least twenty years old. It was for many years dismissed out of hand by policymakers and strategists in both the US and India. For India’s nuclear establishment, such an arrangement was characterized as the thin edge of a wedge allowing the Americans to first cap, then roll back, and finally eliminate the Indian weapons program.
    [Show full text]