DOCSLIB.ORG

The Fall of Sai Gon 30 April 1975

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Fall of Sai Gon 30 April 1975 WALL NOTE TWO: THE FALL OF SAI GON 30 APRIL 1975 DANIEL R. ARANT [email protected] DATE OF INFORMATION: 06 MAY 2008 "We must ensure that any major foreign policy commitment has the full support and understanding of the American people....." GEORGE H. W. BUSH, 41st President of the United States. "The American soldiers who fought in the war did so out of a sense of duty to their country, but their country betrayed them by sending them to an unconscionable war." PHILIP CAPUTO, U.S. Marine infantry platoon leader in Viet Nam and author of A Rumor of War. "... the leaders who planned and executed the war did not understand what they were getting into. The values and ideals we stood for were correct, but it was the wrong war in the wrong place - a place we did not know." RICHARD HOLBROOKE, Foreign Service diplomat in Viet Nam. "Those Americans who went to Vietnam fought for freedom, a truly noble cause. This battle was lost not by those brave Americans and South Vietnamese troops who were waging it but by political misjudgments and strategic failure at the highest levels of government." RONALD REAGAN, 40th President of the United States. "The Vietnam War was a political war that imposed restraints on the military that prevented use of power that we had readily available. ... it was very difficult to tell friend from foe, hence the Calley affair." ADM. THOMAS H. MOORER, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (1970-1974). "It was a disastrous, insane, imperial invasion of a weirdo Third World country." TIMOTHY LEARY. Producer of Psychedelic Celebrations. "It was an Indochina war, as seen from Hanoi, if not from Washington. United States forces were not allowed to block the Ho Chi Minh Trail in Laos and Cambodia. As long as the trail was open, the war could not be won, and peace could not come to the South." PETER BRAESTRUP, newsman in Vietnam. Author of The Big Story: How the American Press and Television Reported and Interpreted the Crisis of Tet 1968 in Vietnam and Washington. "... powerful nations may stumble, though their intentions are good, that tragedy and failure are often the lot of man, even of the citizens of a great and favored nation such as ours." HARRY C. McPHERSON, Jr., Special Assistant to President Lyndon B. Johnson. "We lost the Vietnam War. We could have won it. We could have won it easily if from the start we had fought the real enemy, North Vietnam. ..... The reason our government chose to settle for halfhearted, self-defeating moves in Vietnam was its lack of trust in the American people's judgment." VICE ADM. JAMES B. STOCKDALE, USN. POW. Recipient of the Medal of Honor. Page 1 of 23 "... the United States lost. ...of all the tactical mistakes we made, perhaps the most serious was to take on the fighting of the North Vietnamese main force units, leaving the South Vietnamese to defend the villages. I am sure the results will help ensure that we pick our fights more carefully in the future." JOHN NEGROPONTE, U.S. diplomat in Viet Nam, former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, former Director of National Intelligence, currently Deputy Secretary of State. "The military did not lose a battle of consequence and did not lose the war. The war was lost by congressional actions withdrawing support to the South Vietnamese government despite commitments by President Nixon." GENERAL WILLIAM C. WESTMORELAND, MACV commander, 1964-1968. "The most important thing for today's students to understand about the Vietnam War is that while their country entered the war for moral reasons, it also got out for moral reasons." GARY TRUDEAU, creator of Doonesbury. 01. PURPOSE. A. The above quotes are abstracted from an article titled "What Should We Tell Our Children About Vietnam?" in the May/June 1988 edition of American Heritage. Fifty-two of the respondents are quoted in the article. The editor of the article states: "Taken together, the answers form a powerful and moving record of the national conscience." B. 30 April 2008 was the 33rd anniversary of the fall of Sai Gon and concomitantly, the disappearance of the country of South Viet Nam on 30 April 1975. I have noted that during anniversary dates, Wall visitors ask questions concerning the specific event. This Wall Note may help Park Rangers and volunteers to answer some of the questions regarding the subject. The aim is to present facts and not interpretations, although admittedly, I have discretion of what facts to present. I hope I have been objective. Some of the detailed information may not be relevant to all rangers and volunteers, but I think the information regarding some of the names on the Wall (the five U.S. servicemen who died/went missing on 27 January 1973, the eleven U. S. Air Force personnel killed on the 04 April 1975 C-5A Babylift crash, and the four Marines who died on 29 April 1975, for example), may be useful. I like to converse with Wall visitors who had an association with specific events; I can learn from them. Or, I may be able to educate a visitor about the association of a name with a specific event. C. Thousands of books and articles have been written about the Southeast Asian conflict. Many attempt to answer (01) "who lost the war" (the media, the antiwar movement, the Congress, the President, the military commanders, our South Vietnamese allies, to name a few), or (02) did the U.S. really lose the war, or (03) did we just pack up and go home. It is interesting to me to read how many political and military leaders in their writings blame one another for the result in Viet Nam. But in the end I am reminded of the oft-quoted 25 April 1975 exchange in Ha Noi between then Lt. Col. Harry G. Summers, Jr. (1932-1999), U.S. Army and North Vietnamese Army Colonel Tu. Lt. Col. Summers was the Chief, Negotiations Division, U.S. Delegation, Four Party Joint Military Team (FPJMT) and Col. Tu, Chief, North Vietnamese (Democratic Republic of Viet Nam) Delegation. (See Wall Note Number One regarding the FPJMT.) (01) "You know you never defeated us on the battlefield," said the American colonel. The North Vietnamese colonel pondered this remark a moment. "That may be so," he replied, "but it is also irrelevant." (Summers, Jr., Harry G. Colonel of Infantry, U.S Army. On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War. California: Presidio, 1982.) Page 2 of 23 02. DISCLAIMER. This Wall Note in not an official publication of the U.S. National Park Service or the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund. Some issues are too complex to put into a sentence or two. For in- depth details, refer to paragraph 87, Selected References. Any errors are mine. Corrections are appreciated. 03. NOTE. A. If you desire to find locations of cities/districts/provinces mentioned in this Wall Note, use a contemporary map of the period discussed. Many administrative boundaries were redrawn after 1975. I reflect these changes in the discussion. 04. 14 April 1971. The last operational U.S. Marine Corps combat organization, the 3rd Marine Amphibious Brigade (3rd MAB), is activated. 3rd MAB is composed of: (01) 2nd and 3rd Battalions of the 1st Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, (02) elements of the 11th Marine Regiment (artillery) of the 1st Marine Division, (03) representative fixed-wing and helicopter aircraft of the 1st Marine Air Wing, and (04) supporting units. 3rd MAB personnel are 14,681 Marines and 835 Sailors. 05. 06 May 1971. All U.S. Marine Corps combat operations in Viet Nam cease. The U.S. Army 196th Infantry Brigade (Light) assumes ground operations in the former Marine tactical area of interest (TAOI). Some USMC helicopters continue noncombat flights. 06. 28 June 1971. 542 Marines remain in Viet Nam. They are assigned to the 1st Air and Naval Gunfire Liaison Company (ANGLICO), the Marine Advisory Unit, the U.S. Embassy Security Guard Detachment, and the Military Assistance Command Vietnam (MACV) staff. A. On 29 June 1972, during the North Vietnamese Nguyen Hue/"Eastertide" Offensive, USMC Capt. Michael B. Brown, 1st ANGLICO, was flying with USAF pilot Capt. Steven L. Bennett of the 20th Tactical Air Support Squadron (20th TASS) in a OV-10A Bronco supporting a naval gunfire mission by a Navy cruiser and destroyer, an air control mission by Navy attack aircraft, and an own aircraft strafing mission all in support of South Vietnamese infantry units. The Bronco was hit by a SA-7 Grail surface-to-air missile (SAM) and Capt. Brown's parachute was rendered unusable. Capt. Bennett elected to ditch his aircraft in the sea knowing that because of the aircraft's configuration, his chances for survival were minimal. Capt. Brown survived; Capt. Bennett was killed. Capt. Steven Logan Bennett, USAF received a posthumous Medal of Honor and a U.S. Navy prepositioned merchant ship was named in his honor. (01) Capt. Steven L. Bennett, USAF. 01W 051. 07. 22 August 1972. The U.S. Army's 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) departs Viet Nam. 1/7 operated as Task Force Gary Owen in July and August 1972. A. 1/7 participated in the Battle of LZ X-Ray (14-16 November 1965) during the Ia Drang Campaign (23 October-26 November 1965). The Ia Drang Campaign, LZ X-Ray, and LZ Albany are discussed in the book We Were Soldiers Once ...And Young by Lt. Gen. Harold G. Moore, U.S. Army (Ret.) and Joseph L.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 資料 編：「Contents of CINPAC, Cincpac Commad
    北東アジアにおける米軍の兵力構成に関する研究( 資料 Title 編：「Contents of CINPAC, CinCPAC Commad History, 1960-1984」-3 ) Author(s) 我部, 政明 Citation Issue Date 2004-02-08 URL http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12000/446 Rights CINCPAC Obtained under tile Freedom of Information ~ by the Nautilus!nstitu NUclear PoUcy Project1:8 COMl\1AND HISTORY 1973 Declaumedby: Y~~N~. ~~ Dati Declassified: lj v tJ , :l Althorily: SEC 3.1 E.O. 12958 ,laLUl\1E I fGRMERl V RESTRICTED DATA Unauthorized disclosure subject to Classified by CfNCPAC administrative and criminal sanctions. Handle as Restricted Data in foreign No Foreign Dissemination i dissemination. Section 144b. Atomic Energv Act. 1954. r- -, • t c:opy_'-_'OF 6S COPIES TOP-se-CRE.T f 1 it~ i ~nSll~ ~.i· ~1 CIFD U I\; r 1 ~ 11 ~.. "- I ;.:/ :? _. u·- 7 _.I I _...... - -249- TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Letter of Promulgation i Title Page iii Foreword v Preface vi i Table of Contents ;x List of Illustrations xxv CHAPTER I--THE STATUS OF THE COMMAND 1 SECTION I--THE PACIFIC COMMAND 1 SECTION II--THE CINCPAC STAFF 23 Key Personnel Changes in 1973 23 The CINCPAC Staff 28 Reduction of General/Flag Officer Billets on CINCPAC's Staff 29 Executive Administrative Offices 32 Joint Secretariat 32 Personnel Directorate 32 Operations Directorate 33 Logistics Directorate 34 Plans Directorate 35 Communications-Data Processing Directorate 35 Security Assistance Directorate 37 Establishment of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Regional Office Pacific (AROP) 37 Center for Naval Analyses Representative to CINCPAC Staff 38 Changes to Administrative Workweek 40 SECTION III--COMMAND AND CONTROL 41 Reorganization of PACOM Studied ~ 41 Support Requirements for CINCPAC Alternate Command Faci1itYf!!II!! 44 Pass; bi 1i ty of Defense Department Coordi nators Exp 1ored .
    [Show full text]
  • Not for Publication Until Released by the House Subcommittee on Defense Committee on Appropriations
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS STATEMENT OF VICE ADMIRAL LUKE M. McCOLLUM, U.S. NAVY CHIEF OF NAVY RESERVE BEFORE THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS FISCAL YEAR 2021 NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE March 3, 2020 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 4 NAVY RESERVE FORCE ................................................................................................................................... 5 Commander, Navy Reserve Forces Command (CNRFC) ........................................................................... 5 Commander, Naval Air Forces Reserve (CNAFR) ...................................................................................... 5 Commander, Naval Information Force Reserve (CNIFR) .......................................................................... 6 Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) ........................................................................................ 7 PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Civilian Skills .............................................................................................................................................. 7
    [Show full text]
  • The Mayaguez Rescue O
    On Cambodia’s Koh Tang in 1975, US forces fought the last battle of the Southeast Asia War. USAF photo The Mayaguez Rescue By George M. Watson Jr. n May 12, 1975, a Cam- the Air Force helicopter crews were Two Khmer Rouge gunboats are seen bodian gunboat carrying compelled to carry out a mission for during seizure of the US container ship communist Khmer Rouge which they had no formal training. Mayaguez. O soldiers boarded and The ship and its crew were recov- seized Mayaguez, a US container ship ered, but the cost—in lost service lives They were haunted by North Korea’s sailing from Hong Kong to Thailand and damaged equipment—was high. 1968 seizure of USS Pueblo and its and passing along the coast of Cam- A Mayday distress signal from the Navy crew members, who were held bodia. Coming less than two weeks Mayaguez radio operator guided a Navy for 11 months. after the fall of Saigon and the end P-3 patrol aircraft to the vessel the morn- The US had no formal relations of the Vietnam War, Washington had ing after it was seized. The ship was with the new communist dictatorship no choice but to respond, and it did. riding at anchor about 34 miles from the in Phnom Penh, but it retained formi- The answer was a rescue mission. Cambodian harbor town of Kompong dable military forces in Thailand and The effort, afflicted by rushed planning Som, near a spit of land called Tang the Philippines. For one thing, the and poor intelligence, was chaotic.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam War: Saigon Evacuation After Action Report
    Vietnam War: Saigon Evacuation After Action Report Summary of the evacuation of Saigon, South Vietnam under Operation Frequent Wind: Operations Analysis Group, report no. 2-75. (16 May 1975) BACM RESEARCH WWW.PAPERLESSARCHIVES.COM About BACM Research – PaperlessArchives.com BACM Research/PaperlessArchives.com publishes documentary historical research collections. Materials cover Presidencies, Historical Figures, Historical Events, Celebrities, Organized Crime, Politics, Military Operations, Famous Crimes, Intelligence Gathering, Espionage, Civil Rights, World War I, World War II, Korean War, Vietnam War, and more. Source material from Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Secret Service, National Security Council, Department of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Department of Justice, National Archive Records and Administration, and Presidential Libraries. http://www.paperlessarchives.com Vietnam War: Saigon Evacuation After Action Report Summary of the evacuation of Saigon, South Vietnam under Operation Frequent Wind: Operations Analysis Group, report no. 2-75. On 29 April 1975, Operation Frequent Wind was executed, and 1373 American citizens, 5595 Vietnamese and Third Country Nationals were successfully evacuated by helicopter from the American Embassy Saigon and the DAO compound. Status of events, planning, activation, evacuation operations, lessons learned, and after-action reports regarding Operation Frequent Wind are all covered in this document. Also include several National Security Agency helicopter pilot radio transmissions during the Saigon evacuation transcript sheets. This 16 May 1975 report was declassified on 31 December 1985. .,. U"CLAS~I~ltU ' . SBHFfHENT'~l HEADQUARTERS OF . THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF· PACIFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS GROUP FPO SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 96610 OPERATIONS, ANALYSIS. GROUP REPORT NO.
    [Show full text]
  • January 1980
    A I A t B in this issue: Interview With Secretary Hidalgo JANUARY 1980 MAGAZINE OF'THE U.S. NAVY - 57th YEAR OF PUBLICATION JANUARY 1980 NUMBER 756 Chief of Naval Operations: ADM Thomas B. Hayward .Chiefof.lnformation: RADM David M. Cooney OIC Navy hternal Relations Act: CAPT Robert K. Lewis Jr. Director, NlRA Print Media Div: LT Christine A. Zebrowski Features 6 "WITHOUT LEADERSHIP,THERE IS NO GUIDANCE. .:' New SecNav sees the Navy from different perspectives Page 20 12 HITTING THE RAMP Snowmobile champ feels at home in Iceland 13 THE CELERY STUMPED THEM American sailors spend seven days in Romania 17 NORFOLK MAKES THE CONNECTION Family Services Center phones are ringing 20 "SEND THESE,THE HOMELESS, TEMPEST-TOST, TO ME.. ." 7th Fleet rescues Vietnamese refugees from South China Sea 24 WHIPPLE'S HUMAN LINK TO FREEDOM Four crewmen receive Navy and Marine Corps medals 26 YOUR OBLIGATIONS No. 14 in a series on Navy Rights and Benefits 32 THEY'REMORE THAN ENTERTAINERS Chuting Stars perform aerial acrobatics 42 ALL HANDSINDEX FOR 1979 Page 26 bepartrnents 2 Currents 38 Bearings 48 Mail Buoy Covers Front: Old hands in new positions: SecNav Edward Hidalgo (left) and Deputy SecDef W. Graham Claytor Jr. Photo by Dave Wilson. Inside Front: LT Phil Camp wins the Fourth Annual Marine Corps Marathon with a winning time of 2: 19.35 for the 26.2 mile course. LT Camp is a flight instructor for VT-6. Pen- sacola, Fla. Photo by James Thresher, The Washington Post. Staff: Editor: John Coleman; News Editor: Joanne E. Dumene Associates: Richard Hosier (Layout), Michael Tuffli (Art), Edward Jenkins (Research).
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Stories
    PILOT STORIES DEDICATED to the Memory Of those from the GREATEST GENERATION December 16, 2014 R.I.P. Norm Deans 1921–2008 Frank Hearne 1924-2013 Ken Morrissey 1923-2014 Dick Herman 1923-2014 "Oh, I have slipped the surly bonds of earth, And danced the skies on Wings of Gold; I've climbed and joined the tumbling mirth of sun-split clouds - and done a hundred things You have not dreamed of - wheeled and soared and swung high in the sunlit silence. Hovering there I've chased the shouting wind along and flung my eager craft through footless halls of air. "Up, up the long delirious burning blue I've topped the wind-swept heights with easy grace, where never lark, or even eagle, flew; and, while with silent, lifting mind I've trod the high untrespassed sanctity of space, put out my hand and touched the face of God." NOTE: Portions Of This Poem Appear On The Headstones Of Many Interred In Arlington National Cemetery. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 – Dick Herman Bermuda Triangle 4 Worst Nightmare 5 2 – Frank Hearne Coming Home 6 3 – Lee Almquist Going the Wrong Way 7 4 – Mike Arrowsmith Humanitarian Aid Near the Grand Canyon 8 5 – Dale Berven Reason for Becoming a Pilot 11 Dilbert Dunker 12 Pride of a Pilot 12 Moral Question? 13 Letter Sent Home 13 Sense of Humor 1 – 2 – 3 14 Sense of Humor 4 – 5 15 “Poopy Suit” 16 A War That Could Have Started… 17 Missions Over North Korea 18 Landing On the Wrong Carrier 19 How Casual Can One Person Be? 20 6 – Gardner Bride Total Revulsion, Fear, and Helplessness 21 7 – Allan Cartwright A Very Wet Landing 23 Alpha Strike
    [Show full text]
  • The Vietnam War
    Fact Sheet 1: Introduction- the Vietnam War Between June 1964 and December 1972 around 3500 New Zealand service personnel served in South Vietnam. Unlike the First and Second World Wars New Zealand’s contribution in terms of personnel was not huge. At its peak in 1968 the New Zealand force only numbered 543. Thirty-seven died while on active service and 187 were wounded. The Vietnam War – sometimes referred to as the Second Indochina War – lasted from 1959 to 1975. In Vietnam it is referred to as the American War. It was fought between the communist Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam) and its allies, and the US-supported Republic of Vietnam in the south. It ended with the defeat of South Vietnam in April 1975. Nearly 1.5 million military personnel were killed in the war, and it is estimated that up to 2 million civilians also died. This was the first war in which New Zealand did not fight with its traditional ally, Great Britain. Our participation reflected this country’s increasingly strong defence ties with the United States and Australia. New Zealand’s involvement in Vietnam was highly controversial and attracted protest and condemnation at home and abroad. A study of New Zealand’s involvement in the Vietnam War raises a number of issues. As a historical study we want to find out what happened, why it happened and how it affected people’s lives. This war meant different things to different people. The Vietnam War was, and still is, an important part of the lives of many New Zealanders.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of the American Revolution
    INTRODUCTION One of the missions of The Friends of Valley Forge Park is the promotion of our historical heritage so that the spirit of what took place over two hundred years ago continues to inspire both current and future generations of all people. It is with great pleasure and satisfaction that we are able to offer to the public this chronology of events of The American Revolution. While a simple listing of facts, it is the hope that it will instill in some the desire to dig a little deeper into the fascinating stories underlying the events presented. The following pages were compiled over a three year period with text taken from many sources, including the internet, reference books, tapes and many other available resources. A bibliography of source material is listed at the end of the book. This publication is the result of the dedication, time and effort of Mr. Frank Resavy, a long time volunteer at Valley Forge National Historical Park and a member of The Friends of Valley Forge Park. As with most efforts of this magnitude, a little help from friends is invaluable. Frank and The Friends are enormously grateful for the generous support that he received from the staff and volunteers at Valley Forge National Park as well as the education committee of The Friends of Valley Forge Park. Don R Naimoli Chairman The Friends of Valley Forge Park ************** The Friends of Valley Forge Park, through and with its members, seeks to: Preserve…the past Conserve…for the future Enjoy…today Please join with us and help share in the stewardship of Valley Forge National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of American Prisoners of War in Southeast Asia 1961-1973 by John N. Powers
    Treatment of American Prisoners of War In Southeast Asia 1961-1973 By John N. Powers The years 1961 to 1973 are commonly used when studying American POWs during the Vietnam War, even though history books generally refer to the years 1964 to 1973 in defining that war. Americans were captured as early as 1954 and as late as 1975. In these pages the years 1961 to 1973 will be used. Americans were held prisoner by the North Vietnamese in North Vietnam, the Viet Cong (and their political arm the National Liberation Front) in South Vietnam, and the Pathet Lao in Laos. This article will not discuss those Americans held in Cambodia and China. The Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO) lists 687 American Prisoners of War who were returned alive by the Vietnamese from 1961 through 1976. Of this number, 72 were returned prior to the release of the bulk of the POWs in Operation Homecoming in 1973. Twelve of these early releases came from North Vietnam. DPMO figures list thirty-six successful escapes, thirty-four of them in South Vietnam and two in Laos. There were more than those thirty-six escapes, including some from prison camps in Hanoi itself. Some escapes ended in recapture within hours, some individuals were not recaptured for days, and some were simply never seen again. There were individuals who escaped multiple times, in both North and South Vietnam. However, only thirty- six American prisoners of war escaped and reached American forces. Of those thirty- six successful attempts, twenty-eight of them escaped within their first month of captivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Theater of Rescue: Cultural Representations of U.S. Evacuation from Vietnam (「救済劇場」：合衆国によるベトナム 撤退の文化表象）
    Ayako Sahara Theater of Rescue: Cultural Representations of U.S. Evacuation from Vietnam (「救済劇場」：合衆国によるベトナム 撤退の文化表象） Ayako Sahara* SUMMARY IN JAPANESE: 本論文は、イラク撤退に関して 再び注目を集めたベトナム人「救済」が合衆国の経済的・軍 事的・政治的パワーを維持する役割を果たしてきたと考察し、 ベトナム人救済にまつわる表象言説を批判的に分析する。合 衆国のベトナムからの撤退が、自国と同盟国の扱いをめぐる 「劇場」の役割をいかに果たしたのかを明らかにすることを その主眼としている。ここで「劇場」というのは、撤退が単 一の歴史的出来事であっただけではなく、その出来事を体験 し目撃した人々にとって、歴史と政治が意味をなす舞台とし て機能したことを問うためである。戦争劇場は失敗に終わっ たが、合衆国政府が撤退作戦を通じて、救済劇を立ち上げた ことの意味は大きい。それゆえ、本論文は、従来の救済言説 に立脚せず、撤退にまつわる救済がいかにして立ち上がり、 演じられ、表象されたかを「孤児輸送作戦」、難民輸送と中 央情報局職員フランク・スネップの回想録を取り上げて分析 する。 * 佐原 彩子 Lecturer, Kokushikan University, Tokyo and Dokkyo University, Saitama, Japan. 55 Theater of Rescue: Cultural Representations of U.S. Evacuation from Vietnam It wasn’t until months after the fall of Saigon, and much bloodshed, that America conducted a huge relief effort, airlifting more than 100,000 refugees to safety. Tens of thousands were processed at a military base on Guam, far away from the American mainland. President Bill Clinton used the same base to save the lives of nearly 7,000 Kurds in 1996. But if you mention the Guam Option to anyone in Washington today, you either get a blank stare of historical amnesia or hear that “9/11 changed everything.”1 Recently, with the end of the Iraq War, the memory of the evacuation of Vietnamese refugees at the conclusion of the Vietnam War has reemerged as an exceptional rescue effort. This perception resonates with previous studies that consider the admission of the refugees as “providing safe harbor for the boat people.”2 This rescue narrative has been an integral part of U.S. power, justifying its military and political actions. In response, this paper challenges the perception of the U.S. as rescuing allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 9 Issue 3 Hof.Indd
    Air Commando JOURNAL Publisher Air Commando Norm Brozenick / [email protected] Editor-in-Chief Association Paul Harmon / [email protected] Managing Editor Air Commando Association Board of Directors Richard Newton Chairman of the Board : Maj Gen Norm Brozenick, USAF (Ret) Senior Editor Scott McIntosh / [email protected] President: Col Dennis Barnett, USAF (Ret) Contributing Editor Vice President: Ron Dains CMSgt Bill Turner, USAF (Ret) Treasurer: Contributing Editor Col David Mobley, USAF (Ret) Joel Higley Public Affairs/Marketing Director Executive Director: Maj Gen Rich Comer, USAF (Ret) Melissa Gross / [email protected] Directors: Graphic Designer CMSgt Tom Baker, USAF (Ret) Jeanette Elliott / [email protected] CMSgt Heather Bueter, USAF (Ret) Col Steve Connelly, USAF (Ret) Lt Col Max Friedauer, USAF (Ret) “The Air Commando Journal... Lt Col Chris Foltz, USAF (Ret) SMSgt Hollis Tompkins, USAF (Ret) Massively Successful! I save all mine.” Additional Positions & Advisors: Lt Gen Marshall “Brad” Webb SES Bill Rone, (Ret) Executive Financial Advisor Former AFSOC Commander Col Jerry Houge, USAF (Ret) Chaplain (Used with permission by Lt Gen Webb) CMSgt Mike Gilbert, USAF (Ret) Attorney Sherri Hayes, GS-15, (Ret) Civilian Advisor Mike Moore, Financial Development Advisor ADVERTISERS IN THIS ISSUE Air Commando Association ......................................................... 52 The Air Commando Journal publication is free to all current members of the Air Commando Association. Anytime Flight Members ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal, March-April 2015, Volume 29, No. 2
    March–April 2015 Volume 29, No. 2 AFRP 10-1 Features Sea-Land Basing of Air Refueling Forces ❙ 5 A Concept for Resiliency and Efficiency Dr. Robert C. Owen Building a Partnership between the United States and India ❙ 29 Exploring Airpower’s Potential Dr. Adam B. Lowther Dr. Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan The SAC Mentality ❙ 48 The Origins of Strategic Air Command’s Organizational Culture, 1948–51 Dr. Melvin G. Deaile Common Sense ❙ 74 Improving the Efficacy of Wide Area Surveillance Hugh McFadden Jr. The Rise of IPv6 ❙ 103 Benefits and Costs of Transforming Military Cyberspace Dr. Panayotis A. Yannakogeorgos Departments 129 ❙ Views Twenty-First-Century Aerial Mining ❙ 129 Col Michael W. Pietrucha, USAFR Reawaken the American Spirit of Innovation in Your Organization ❙ 151 Col Stephen B. Waller, USAF 166 ❙ Ricochets & Replies Employing Intelliegence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance ❙ 166 Organizing, Training, and Equipping to Get It Right Mr. Mike Snelgrove Capt Jaylan Haley, USAF Capt Adam B. Young, USAF 171 ❙ Book Reviews Operation KE: The Cactus Air Force and the Japanese Withdrawal from Guadalcanal . 171 Roger Letourneau and Dennis Letourneau Reviewer: Capt Ian S. Bertram, USAF Rudder: From Leader to Legend . 172 Thomas M. Hatfield Reviewer: Capt David Villar, USAFR On Point II: Transition to the New Campaign; The United States Army in Operation IRAQI FREEDOM, May 2003–January 2005 . 175 Dr. Donald P. Wright and Col Timothy R. Reese Reviewer: Maj Paul Niesen, USAF, Retired Adak: The Rescue of Alfa Foxtrot 586 . 177 Andrew C. A. Jampoler Reviewer: 2d Lt Herman B. Reinhold, USAF David and Lee Roy: A Vietnam Story .
    [Show full text]