DOCSLIB.ORG

B2. Electricity from Renewables in Croatia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
B2. Electricity from Renewables in Croatia Report No: AUS0000353 . Croatia Energy Sector Note Public Disclosure Authorized . September 2018 . Public Disclosure Authorized Energy and Extractives, Poverty and Equity Global Practices Europe and Central Asia Region (ECA) . Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank . © 2017 The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. All queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: [email protected]. Croatia Energy Sector Note September 2018 by Energy and Extractives, Poverty and Equity Global Practices Europe & Central Asia Department The World Bank 1 Acknowledgements The study team is grateful to acknowledge guidance and cooperation from energy counterparts in Croatia namely the Ministry of Environment and Energy, the Ministry of Regional Development and EU Funds, HERA, HROTE, CROPEX, HEP Group, Plinacro, and Energy Institute Hrvoje Požar. Much appreciation to colleagues at the European Commission: Mr. Nikola Car, Mr. Ulrich von Koppenfels, Mr. Anastasios Papandreou, Ms. Serena Pontoglio. From the European Environment Agency Mr. Francois Dejean and Mr. Mihai Tomescu. From the World Bank: Ms. Elisabetta Capannelli, Mr. Sameer Shukla, Mr. Catalin Pauna, Mr. Josip Funda, Mr. Andrea Liverani, Mr. Feng Liu, Mr. Dejan Ostojic, Mr. Jas Singh, Mr. David Reinstein, Mr. Moritz Meyer, Mr. Marko Balenovic, Ms. Thuy Bich Nguyen. From the IFC: Ms. Magdalena Soljakova, Mr. Alan Townsend, Mr. Ignacio De Calonge, and Ms. Nayve Martinez Rubio. 2 Disclaimers This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development /The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. This Croatia Energy Sector Note is authored by Rome Chavapricha (Senior Energy Specialist), Tatyana Kramskaya (Senior Energy Specialist), Paul Andres Corral Rodas (Poverty Economist), and Stephanie Ekaette Trpkov (Consultant) of the World Bank. Any inquiries on the note should be submitted to Rome Chavapricha at [email protected] and Thuy Bich Nguyen at [email protected]. 3 Contents Summary and Key Messages .......................................................................................................... 5 A. Energy Intensity and Efficiency in Croatia ................................................................................ 9 DS1. Residential sector ........................................................................................................................... 10 DS2. Building and construction sector ................................................................................................... 11 DS3. Tourism sector ............................................................................................................................... 13 DS4. Transport sector ............................................................................................................................. 17 DS5. Industrial sector .............................................................................................................................. 19 SS1. Thermal Electricity and Heat Generation Efficiency ..................................................................... 21 SS2. District Heating Efficiency ............................................................................................................. 22 SS3. Electricity and Natural Gas Transmission & Distribution Efficiency ............................................ 22 B. Energy Security Under a Competitive and Open Electricity and Gas Markets ....................... 24 B1. Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 24 B2. Electricity from Renewables in Croatia ........................................................................................... 28 B3. Natural gas in Croatia ....................................................................................................................... 32 B4. State-owned Enterprises in the Energy Sector ................................................................................. 32 C. Financing and Investment in Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy ................................ 34 C1. Energy Services Companies Model ................................................................................................. 34 C2. Research and development ecosystem for RE, EE, and available funding options ......................... 35 C3. Croatian Business and Global Renewable Energy Value Chain ...................................................... 36 C4. ESCO model in the transport sector ................................................................................................. 37 D. Energy Affordability in Croatia ............................................................................................... 38 D1. Croatia Context for Energy Affordability ........................................................................................ 38 D2. Electricity and Gas Prices in Croatia ............................................................................................... 39 D3. Addressing Energy Affordability in Croatia .................................................................................... 40 Annex 1 -- Croatia Energy Sector in Numbers ............................................................................. 44 4 Summary and Key Messages Croatia joined the European Union (EU) in 2013, and the energy sector has been undergoing liberalization, deregulation, and unbundling of state-owned energy utilities. Croatia has welcomed a number of new public and private energy companies. The Croatian Power Exchange was established in 2014 and commenced operation in 2016 as a platform for electricity trade. Main Challenges Croatia’s energy intensity (EI) is high and could be substantially improved. Croatia has more than a decade of experiences in energy efficiency (EE) actions and financing. However, Croatia’s EI remains 55 percent higher than EU average. Building on its EE experience and institutions, Croatia can leap forward and achieve a more ambitious EE and EI targets by scrutinizing sub-sectoral EE and EI targets as envisaged under Croatia’s 4th EE Action Plan (residential, buildings, service and industrial, transport sectors). Energy efficiency financing through traditional financial institutions remains limited. Croatia has more than a decade of experience in the Energy Services Company (ESCO) model, with a good range of services on offers. Considering the learning curve of the model in Croatia, ESCO in this context refers to the integration of all energy services in all project phases, through a single contract with guarantees on energy savings, and effective multi-faceted risk management. However, the gap in Croatia’s ESCO model continues to be scaling up through traditional financial institutions. Confirming and addressing the constraints of ESCOs at a micro-level could help substantially expand EE financing options and optimize their performance. The next phase of renewable energy projects needs support. Croatia has committed to decarbonizing its energy sector through expanding renewable energy and reducing carbon emission of fossil fuels. Adding more renewables—particularly wind and solar—could help reduce Croatia’s energy intensity by displacing less efficient fuels such as coal, natural gas and biomass (in households). Thanks to existing hydropower plants and recent addition of wind and solar power generation, Croatia has already exceeded the EU renewable energy target of 20 percent in final energy consumption by 2020. However, intermittent wind and solar capacity accounted for just 11 percent (539 MW) of installed grid-connected power generation capacity in Croatia (2016), meaning there is a substantial room to increase (e.g. toward 20 percent) without disrupting the power grid. The key question is “what’s next for renewables in Croatia”? Potential hydropower projects are faced with environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Community Center Rojc, Pula, Croatia
    SOLIDARITY MOVERS OF ROJC Community center Rojc, Pula, Croatia CONTENT Community center Rojc Rojc Alliance About the project Activities About Pula Currency How to get to Pula Meet the team Contact Follow us Community center Rojc is a unique space Community for culture and civil society. Situated in a repurposed building that forms part of the cultural heritage of Pula, the center gathers center Rojc over a hundred organisations under one roof while also hosting numerous cultural and social events. The center is polivalent space with wide spectrum of activities: culture, sports, psychosocial care and health services, activities for children and youth, care for the disabled, environmental protection, technical culture, ethnic minorities, etc. Community center Rojc is a member of Trans Europe Halles. Rojc Alliance The Rojc Alliance is a network of Rojc organizations that presents and represents common interests, promotes mutual cooperation and carries out community actions and events. Main activities of Rojc Alliance are: management and events in Rojc public spaces - the Living room and inner courtyard; community radio Radio Rojc; community development programs; participatory governance; networking and fostering development of cultural and community centers; European Solidarity Corps volunteering progams. The Rojc Alliance has formed a kind of civic-public partnership with the City of Pula, which co- governs the center and encourages its development. WHAT WE DO The center is a host to 110 associations from various fields. Thousands of Rojc inhabitants and their visitors pass through its painted hallways each week – bringing vivid influence to the community life. PROJECT NAME Solidarity movers of Rojc PROJECT DURATION 1.8.2019.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN INTEGRATION PROCESSES Where Is Croatia?
    157 Dragomir Vojnić* UDK 338.22 (497.5):339.923 Izvorni znanstveni rad EUROPEAN INTEGRATION PROCESSES Where is Croatia? Paper prepared for the International conference on “Russia and the CIS in recent European integration processes” Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of International Economic and Political Studies Moscow, October 17-18, 2002 The fact that by admission of Slovenia the borders of the European Union almost reached Zagreb, repeatedly provoked a discussion about the reasons of lagging behind of Croatia. The author observes the basic reasons (beside the imposed war) in political atmosphere which was unacceptable for international community. Such atmosphere resulted in big mistakes of the entire (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and economic policy (tycoon privatization and the wrong stabilization level). Unacceptable political atmosphere is also shown by the fact that Croatian and Slovenian economists commonly prepared the starting bases of transition. Slovenia consistently implemented this concept, while Croatia completely ignored it. The second wave of democratization (at the beginning of century) created political atmosphere more acceptable for international community and more adequate for economic development. Beside certain progress in economic sphere especially expressed are shifts in direction of somewhat faster integration into the European Union. In this sense the author was also encouraged by the President of the European Commission Romano Prodi at the XIII th World Congress of economists in Lisbon, September 9 to 13, 2002. * D. Vojnić, prof. dr. sc., znanstveni savjetnik Ekonomskog instituta, Zagreb (u mirovini) D. VOJNI∆: European Integration Processes 158 EKONOMSKI PREGLED, 54 (1-2) 157-172 (2003) Some general causes of lagging behind of Croatia Comparing achievements of European countries in transition (within environment of globalization trends and integration processes and looking for position of Croatia) one question has been repeatedly imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • D6.4 Case Study D
    Grant Agreement Number: INEA/CEF/TRAN/M2018/179967 Project acronym: SLAIN Project full title: Saving Lives Assessing and Improving TEN-T Road Network Safety D. 1.0 Due delivery date: 31st March 2021 Actual delivery date: 13th March 2021 Organisation name of lead participant for this deliverable: RSI ‘Panos Mylonas’ D6.4: Activity 6 case studies group D Co-financed by the Connecting Europe Facility of the European Union SLAIN 1 V1.3 Document Control Sheet Version Input by Consortium partners History V1.0 Version for submission to INEA Legal Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The above referenced consortium members shall have no liability for damages of any kind including without limitation direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages that may result from the use of these materials subject to any liability which is mandatory due to applicable law. © 2020 by SLAIN Consortium. Acknowledgement The SLAIN beneficiaries are grateful to EuroRAP and iRAP for the research information provided. The report was coordinated and prepared by RSI Panos Mylonas, supported by iRAP and the Road Safety Foundation, with liaison with INEA by the project coordinator EuroRAP. Individual project partners provided the case studies. Abbreviations and Acronyms Acronym Abreviation SLAIN Saving Lives Assessing and Improving Network Safety TEN-T Trans-European Network - Transport GIS Geographic Information System SRIP Safer Roads Investment Plans RSA Road Safety Audit RSI Road Safety Inspection SLAIN 2 Version 1.0 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 SLAIN project objectives ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Health Insurance Zagreb
    Health Insurance for LES Embassy of the United States of America Zagreb, Croatia Combined Synopsis and Solicitation 19GE5021R0013 Questions and Answers Q1: Please provide five years of loss data(table 1) by year of account including annual net premium (for the same period), incurred claims and membership history. For membership history (Table 2) please provide the number of Employees with single coverage and with family coverage at the end of each year. Please do not include any confidential information, just the overall statistics for the group. Claims information is critical to our pricing and the relationship of claims to employee growth or shrinkage is part of the claims analysis. Table 1 Contractual year Total claims Retention Total Net gain Net gain paid (local amount premium (local USD or EUR currency) (local paid to currency) currency) Insurer (local currency) dd/mm/2016 – dd/mm/2017 dd/mm/2017 – dd/mm/2018 dd/mm/2018 – dd/mm/2019 dd/mm/2019 – dd/mm/2020 dd/mm/2020 – dd/mm/2021 Table 2 Contractual year Single Self plus ONE Family plans dd/mm/2016 – dd/mm/2017 dd/mm/2017 – dd/mm/2018 dd/mm/2018 – dd/mm/2019 dd/mm/2019 – dd/mm/2020 dd/mm/2020 – dd/mm/2021 A1: This is a first-time post is contracting this service, historical data is not available. Q2 : We would like to know if you have been informed of Catastrophic cases, such as: Hemodynamics, Open Heart Surgery, Orthopedic Mayor Surgeries, Organ Transplant, Traumatic Accident, Cancer and Oncology Cases (Radio and Chemotherapy), and hospitalizations with more than 10 days A2: The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • English No. ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 Date: 18 July 2019 the APPEALS CHAMBER Before
    ICC-01/04-01/06-3466-Red 18-07-2019 1/137 NM A7 A8 Statute Original: English No. ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 Date: 18 July 2019 THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Piotr Hofmański, Presiding Judge Chile Eboe-Osuji Judge Howard Morrison Judge Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza Judge Solomy Balungi Bossa SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. THOMAS LUBANGA DYILO Public redacted Judgment on the appeals against Trial Chamber II’s ‘Decision Setting the Size of the Reparations Award for which Thomas Lubanga Dyilo is Liable’ No: ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 1/137 ICC-01/04-01/06-3466-Red 18-07-2019 2/137 NM A7 A8 Judgment to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: Legal Representatives of V01 Victims Counsel for the Defence Mr Luc Walleyn Ms Catherine Mabille Mr Franck Mulenda Mr Jean-Marie Biju-Duval Legal Representatives of V02 Victims Trust Fund for Victims Ms Carine Bapita Buyangandu Mr Pieter de Baan Mr Joseph Keta Orwinyo Office of Public Counsel for Victims Ms Paolina Massidda REGISTRY Registrar Mr Peter Lewis No: ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 2/137 ICC-01/04-01/06-3466-Red 18-07-2019 3/137 NM A7 A8 J u d g m e n t ................................................................................................................... 4 I. Key findings ........................................................................................................... 5 II. Introduction to the appeals ..................................................................................... 6 III. Preliminary issues ............................................................................................... 8 A. OPCV’s standing to participate in these appeals ............................................ 8 B. Admissibility of the OPCV’s Consolidated Response to the Appeal Briefs in respect of Mr Lubanga’s Appeal Brief ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SVILAJ Dionica Osijek - Đakovo LEGENDA
    A5 BELI MANASTIR - OSIJEK - SVILAJ Dionica Osijek - Đakovo LEGENDA u prometu 2007. u prometu 2009. u planu ostale autoceste MOST DRAVA ODMOR. STROSSMAYEROVAC MOST HRASTINKA MOST SAVA LINIJSKI PRIKAZ AUTOCESTE A5 BUDAPEST LEGENDA R. HRVATSKA Beli Manastir PUO Baranja Most Most Drava, L = 2485 m PUO Mursa Osijek PUO Beketinci u prometu 2007. u prometu 2009. A5 PUO Strossmayerovac u planu Most Topolina, L = 131 m ostale autoceste Most Hrastinka, L = 176 m PUO Ivandvor Most preko zapadnog lateralnog kanala, L = 133 m PUO Andrijevci Sredanci ZAGREB LIPOVAC A3 A3 Svilaj R. HRVATSKA BiH Most Sava, L = 756 m SARAJEVO AUTOCESTA A5 // BELI MANASTIR - OSIJEK - SVILAJ Autocesta A5 Beli Manastir - Osijek - Svilaj Autocesta A5 Beli Manastir - Osijek - Svilaj, dio je međunarodnog Paneuropskog cestovnog koridora Vc i jedan od najvažnijih ogranaka TEM/TER Projekta. Predmetna autocesta je dio europske mreže prome- tnica s oznakom E73, koja sjever Europe povezuje s Jadranom. Prometni koridor Vc, koji se pruža od Budimpešte preko Sarajeva do Ploča složena je poveznica sjeverne – srednje i južne Europe te predstavlja izuzetnu vri- jednost za privrednu i prometnu integraciju srednjo- europskog prostora. Izgradnjom prometnog koridora Vc povezanost i transparentnost prometnih pravaca cestovnog, željezničkog, riječnog i zračnog prometa direktno će utjecati na razvoj šireg i snažnijeg prome- tnog povezivanja Europe i Azije. 3 AUTOCESTA A5 // BELI MANASTIR - OSIJEK - SVILAJ Na dijelu Vc koridora, koji prolazi kroz teritorij Repu- Autocesta A5 Beli Manastir Osijek – Svilaj, dužine 88,6 blike Hrvatske, nalazi se autocesta A5 Beli Manastir km, podijeljena je na sljedeće dionice: – Osijek – Svilaj, koja se proteže od granice s Repu- blikom Mađarskom do granice s Republikom Bosnom Granica Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Croatia in 2011
    2011 Minerals Yearbook CROATIA U.S. Department of the Interior September 2013 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF CROATIA By Harold R. Newman Petroleum extraction and refining were the major economic tone of the Mining Act, which is designed to give control over activities of Croatia’s mineral industry. Mineral resources mineral reserves back to the state (International Law Office, included bauxite, clays, coal, gypsum, mica, natural asphalt, 2011). petroleum, and salt. The country remained reliant on mineral commodity imports for its industrial needs. Most of the output Minerals in the National Economy of industrial minerals was consumed by the domestic market. In 2011, mineral resources and mineral production were not The Government was continuing with the process for entering significant to Croatia’s national economy. Croatia had a trade the European Union (EU) in 2013. deficit in mining and quarrying goods (a category that included The Energy and Mining Directorate (EMD) is the mineral fuels) in 2011; exports were valued at about 851 million Government agency responsible for governmental activities kuna (HRK) ($143 million1), and imports were valued at related to the energy and mining sectors. The Directorate’s HRK15.5 billion ($2.6 billion). Exports of petroleum and natural responsibilities include drafting laws and regulations related gas were valued at HRK618 million ($104 million), and imports to the energy and mining sectors and planning, proposing, of natural gas and petroleum were valued at HRK14.3 billion developing, and implementing energy and mining policies, ($2.4 billion) (Croatian Bureau of Statistics, 2011). including the Government’s energy development strategy Croatia’s main trading partner was the EU, and the main (Energy and Mining Directorate, 2011a).
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Financing Review for Croatia Protected Areas
    The World Bank Sustainable Financing Review for Croatia Protected Areas October 2009 www.erm.com Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world The World Bank /PROFOR Sustainable Financing Review for Croatia Protected Areas October 2009 Prepared by: James Spurgeon (ERM Ltd), Nick Marchesi (Pescares), Zrinca Mesic (Oikon) and Lee Thomas (Independent). For and on behalf of Environmental Resources Management Approved by: Eamonn Barrett Signed: Position: Partner Date: 27 October 2009 This report has been prepared by Environmental Resources Management the trading name of Environmental Resources Management Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. Environmental Resources Management Limited Incorporated in the United Kingdom with registration number 1014622 Registered Office: 8 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0ER CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 AIMS 2 1.3 APPROACH 2 1.4 STRUCTURE OF REPORT 3 1.5 WHAT DO WE MEAN BY SUSTAINABLE FINANCE 3 2 PA FINANCING IN CROATIA 5 2.1 CATEGORIES OF PROTECTED
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport
    [Show full text]
  • Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route
    Route Evaluation Report Croatia EuroVelo 8 – Mediterranean Route MEDCYCLETOUR Project Davorin Belamarić April 27th 2018 Contents 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Mission of the project and report objectives ................................................................. 5 1.2 Organization ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Brief methodological explanations ................................................................................ 8 1.3.1 Different phases of the route evaluation ................................................................ 8 1.3.2 ECS – European Certification Standard used for this evaluation ........................... 9 1.3.3 Used tools and equipment, photographs ..............................................................10 1.4 Overview of the sections .............................................................................................10 2 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................16 2.1 Existing route infrastructure ........................................................................................16 2.1.1 Public transport ....................................................................................................19 2.2 Critical deficiencies .....................................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Etir Code Lists
    eTIR Code Lists Code lists CL01 Equipment size and type description code (UN/EDIFACT 8155) Code specifying the size and type of equipment. 1 Dime coated tank A tank coated with dime. 2 Epoxy coated tank A tank coated with epoxy. 6 Pressurized tank A tank capable of holding pressurized goods. 7 Refrigerated tank A tank capable of keeping goods refrigerated. 9 Stainless steel tank A tank made of stainless steel. 10 Nonworking reefer container 40 ft A 40 foot refrigerated container that is not actively controlling temperature of the product. 12 Europallet 80 x 120 cm. 13 Scandinavian pallet 100 x 120 cm. 14 Trailer Non self-propelled vehicle designed for the carriage of cargo so that it can be towed by a motor vehicle. 15 Nonworking reefer container 20 ft A 20 foot refrigerated container that is not actively controlling temperature of the product. 16 Exchangeable pallet Standard pallet exchangeable following international convention. 17 Semi-trailer Non self propelled vehicle without front wheels designed for the carriage of cargo and provided with a kingpin. 18 Tank container 20 feet A tank container with a length of 20 feet. 19 Tank container 30 feet A tank container with a length of 30 feet. 20 Tank container 40 feet A tank container with a length of 40 feet. 21 Container IC 20 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 20 feet. 22 Container IC 30 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 30 feet. 23 Container IC 40 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 40 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Dubrovnik, Croatia 2019 TABLE of CONTENTS
    GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE TOURISM COUNCIL DESTINATION ASSESSMENT Dubrovnik, Croatia 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................................................................................4 Acronyms........................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Tables.....................................................................................................................................................................................6 List of Figures...................................................................................................................................................................................7 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................................................8 Overview of Tourism in Dubrovnik ......................................................................................................................................11 A. Geography and Tourism Statistics..................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]