Climate Change Impact on Olneya Tesota A. Gray (Ironwood) Distribution in Sonoran Desert Using Maxent Modeling Approach

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climate Change Impact on Olneya Tesota A. Gray (Ironwood) Distribution in Sonoran Desert Using Maxent Modeling Approach Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity 1(2): 110-117 (2017) by Arak University, Iran (http://jwb.araku.ac.ir/) Research Article DOI: 10.22120/jwb.2017.28427 Climate change impact on Olneya tesota A. Gray (Ironwood) distribution in Sonoran desert using MaxEnt Modeling approach variable is BIO2=Mean Diurnal Range (Mean of 1 Ahmad Moghaddam-Gheshlagh *, Sergio monthly (max temp - min temp)) (0.9%). This 1 Hernández-Verdugo , Edgar Omar means that the presence of the species is highly 2 3 Rueda-Puente , Jesús Soria-Ruiz , Saúl depended on dry months precipitation of which 1 Parra-Terrazas , Antonio Pacheco- doesn’t have high fluctuations according to the 1 4 Olvera , Nastaran Mafakheri used climate change scenario. Temperature fluctuations have not affected O. tesota A. Gray 1 *Agronomy Faculty, Autonomous University presence as it is known as a resistant species for of Sinaloa, Sinaloa, Mexico. extremely high temperatures. Therefore the email: [email protected] probability of the presence of the species shows 2Agriculture and Livestock Department (DAG), a significant increase on high altitudes University of Sonora, Bahía Kino Highway Km 18.5. 83000 Hermosillo, Sonora, México. mountains on the north-east of the Sonora state. 3Geomatics Lab., National Institute of Research Finally, the study concludes that the climate for Forestry Agricultural and Livestock change will affect the distribution of the O. (INIFAP). Zinacantepec 51350, Mexico. tesota A. Gray as an extinction risk and the same 4Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of time will help the expansion of the species Agriculture and Natural Resources, Arak presence probability on the region. And it has University, Arak, Iran. been encountered new regions to recommend this valuable species as a reforestation Received: 2 September 2017 / Revised: 27 September 2017 / Accepted: 8 October 2017 / Published online: 12 November 2017. alternative for conservation and management Ministry of Sciences, Research and Technology, Arak University, strategy like Soyopa, Aguaprieta and Sahuaripa Iran. municipalities among the others. Abstract Keywords: Ironwood, Distribution, Climate Based on different climatic scenarios, the change, Sonoran desert, Mexico. distribution of the Olneya tesota A. Gray (Ironwood) has been modeled using MaxEnt Introduction modeling approach in the Sonora State of Extinction and invasion risks of species is an Mexico. Maximum Entropy species Distribution important issue on natural resources Modeling was used to predict distribution conservation and management in all over the probability. 71,168 presence data and BIO1 to world (Walker 2014). Climate change impact BIO19 variables of Worldclim BIOCLIM on natural resources is an important driver of dataset for the present time, 2050 and 2070 used extinction and invasion risk and these kinds of for modeling. The model performed with an studies are highly recommended to formulate acceptable range of sensitivity for training data more efficiently bio-informatics conservation (AUC=0.927) and random prediction and management strategies (Peterson et al. (AUC=0.5). The results demonstrated that the 2015). Many types of research are indicating high contributed variable on the presence of the that the extinction risk is rising because of O. tesota A. Gray is BIO17 Precipitation of climate change impact (Thomas et al. 2004; Driest Quarter (48.3%) and the low contributed Pearson et al. 2014) and anthropogenic 111 | Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity 1(2): 110-117 (2017) activities unsustainable increasing (Leão et al. others (Araújo et al. 2005, Phillips et al. 2006). 2014). The global average of the extinction There are different models developing day by ratio of the species that mainly caused by day in this area of science with using different climate change impact globally is around 1% of algorithms such as BIOMAPPER (ecological the species per year, and many important niche factor analysis), GARP (genetic scientific journals papers like Nature Journal algorithm), GRASP (generalized linear model), mentioning the extinction rate of the species SPECIES (Artificial neural network) (Austin will increase to more than 10% per year on 2007, Pearson et al. 2011) and many others. 2050, and some of them calculating for Mexico One of the most common presence data-only biodiversity it will be more than global average used is MaxEnt (Maximum Entropy) model and even 35% of biodiversity on 2050 will (Phillip et al. 2004, Khanum et al. 2013) that extinct (Thomas et al. 2004; Peterson et al. has shown good results on distribution 2015). For Mexican deserts, this problem is prediction and model evaluation (Matyukhina more visible because of agricultural expansion et al. 2015, Elia et al. 2015). Worldclim and other inadequate use of water resources BioClimatic database is well-known to use as a among the others. Therefore, it is crucial to put principal database as environmental layers special emphasis on desert keystone species. inputs on SDM modeling. As coming in this For various reasons, even in developed paper the world climate provided data from the countries, identification, sampling and real global climate change modeling scenarios are mapping of the natural resources still remains a also common for future distribution modeling difficult issue for each species (Del Barrio et al. of the species. And also it is proved that using 2006) on actual time and their changes with the the collection of different species sampling currently high climate changes fluctuations and geographical coordination also applicable for anthropogenic activities impact on the modeling for the enriching of the observational populations and distributions of the species database for any SDM modeling like MaxEnt. (Peterson et al. 2015). Unfortunately, Mexico O. tesota A. Gray (Ironwood) is one of the high as a mega-biodiverse country with more than value and key species s as a principal pattern 40% territory superficies’ as arid and semiarid distributed on Sonoran desert ecosystem zones with continuous increasing of (Shupe 2005) which illegally cut by people for desertification and deforestation (Vázquez- different uses such as handicrafts and coal Méndez et al. 2008) and categorized with a high production among the other purposes (Zuñiga rate of desertification on international scientific and Suzán 2010). This species is an endemic communities. On the other hand, these areas one that classified as being in extinction risk key species’ have special importance on treat and encountered under the special ecology, ecosystem and human life (Medeiros protection of NOM. 056. 2010 of Mexico and it and Drezner 2012). There are few studies about is recommended numerous times to the Mexico flora species distribution with conservation, rehabilitation and as a evaluation of climate change impact on their reforestation alternative on the Sonoran desert distribution and almost there is no study about (Verónica and Humberto 2014). Due to high climate change impact on the distribution of costs and risks of reforestation and desert species like O. tesota A. Gray (Del-Val rehabilitation on desert regions, generating et al. 2015). useful and applicable knowledge on the local Species Distribution Modeling (SDM) models scale about the future suitable environment for are one of the useful instruments to study niche its presence is necessitated as a management modeling, extinction and invasion risk, micro strategy planning (Medeiros and Drezner and macro habitat suitability and climate 2012). Unfortunately, there are only a few change impact on their distribution among the studies about O. tesota A. Gray and other desert 112 | Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity 1(2): 110-117 (2017) species actual distribution and suitable is the principal part of the global habitat of the environmental conditions considering climate O. tesota A. Gray species with 179,355 km2 change impact to know future distribution area considered as an area of study. This region (Zuñiga and Suzán 2010). Therefore, in this has an elevation from 0 m to 2,620 m of the study, it is hypothesized that the climate change elevation expanded from Baja California Gulf or global warming is a strong threat of the to Sierra Madre Occidental Mountains that extinction of O. tesota A. Gray on Sonoran includes 3 types of climate Variety to consider desert. Therefore they are many questions about as the principal demonstrative habitat of the O. O. tesota A. Gray species that may respond by tesota A. Gray (Fig. 1). MaxEnt modeling. Our study focused on finding some confinable responses for following questions: 1-How is the actual probable presence distribution of the species on the Sonora State of Mexico according to all historical presence data of it on Sonora State? 2) How will affect global warming (climate change) in 2050 and 2070 on the distribution of the species? or whether climate change is an extinction risk Figure 1. Delimitation of distribution of the species treat for it? or will affect the suitability of (http://globalspecies.org/kmlserver/getkml/Olneya_ environment condition for it in the future at tesota/range). Sonora State? 3) Which environmental factors The strongly altered habitat patch, are more important in the actual and future ‘Falkenbergwiese’ (hereafter FB), was an distribution of the species at Sonora State? And isolated 5-ha meadow in the north of Vienna why? 4) What kinds of recommendations may (48°18'N, 16°22'E; elevation 318 m). The give to conservation and management strategy native dry
Recommended publications
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Yaqui Watershed, Northwestern Mexico: Use and Management 1
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Rio Yaqui Watershed, Northwestern Mexico: Use and Management 1 Luis Bojorquez2, Raymundo Aguirre3 and Alfredo Ortega4 Abstract.-- This paper describes the uses and communi­ ty types of the Rio Yaqui Watershed in Sonora Mexico. The management problems are interrelated but there are no stud­ ies of sufficient regional scope to integrate the uses of the area. To cope with this, research activities associated with management have to be multidisciplinary. INTRODUCTION The use of an ecosystems often influ~ ences other natural systems (Ffolliott The State of Sonora, Mexico, is loca­ 1980). Riparian ecosystems utilization ted on the northwestern corner of The impact, and is impacted by, other uses of Mexican Republic. It is limited by the their basin. For this reason a study was Sierra Madre Occidental, on the east, by made to describe the vegetational community the State of Arizona on the north, by the types that occur in the Rio Yaqui Watershed state of Sinaloa, on the south, and by the and their sometimes conflicting usage. Gulf of California, on the east. Agriculture, ranching, mining, fores­ Sonora presents two main landforms: try, and recreation are the principal land uses at present (SAHOP 1980) and larger im­ Northwestern Coastal Plain.- It ex­ pacts and conflicts can be expected in the tenrls from the outlet of the Colorado future. Basic research is needed to recon­ River to the south along the coast. and cile apparently antagonistic requirements of individual components of some multipur­ Sierra Madre Occidental.- It is ad­ pose combinations (King 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting Desert Shade Trees
    Your one-stop guide to a variety of shade trees that grow well in the dry Arizona ARIZONA DESERT SHADE TREES Sonoran Desert environment. Frost Potential Growth Water Possible Tree Benefits Height Shape Spread Toler- Planting Rate Usage Problems Type ance Areas orked, P=Pyramidal, N=Narrow, Mature Specimens at Desert Botanical Garden? Thorny: V=Very, M=Moderate, S=Slightly, N=No Thorns Hardiness: Degrees Fahrenheit S=Semi-Hardy, H=Hardy E=Evergreen, S=Semi- deciduous, D=Deciduous D=Desert T=Turf, Native Arizona Shade Tree Beneficial to Native Wildlife Heaviest Bloom Season: SP=Spring, SU=Summer, F=Fall, W=Winter Flower Color: C=Cream, W=White, R=Red Prp=Purple, P=Pink, Y=Yellow, Okay to Grow Near Electric Lines? Y = Yes, N = No S=<25', M=25-40', L=>40' S-Spreading, M=Multi/Trunked/Low- f C=Conical S=<25', M=25-40', L=>40' S=Slow, M=Medium, F=Fast L=Low, M=Medium Rot, Root T=Texas Chlorosis, I=Iron D=Other Diseases, P=Pests, L=Litter, W=Wind Damage, In=Invasive Roots Aleppo Pine N/A N L S LMMD,P N H E T Pinus halepensis Blue Palo Verde SP Y N M S/M M ML L MHD D Parkinsonia florida Cascalote WY Y SS S F L P,L V 28/S S T/D Parkinsonia caesalpinia Chinese Elm SU/F N LS L M M T,L N HS T Ulmus parvifolia Chinese Pistache SU N LS L M M T,L N HD T Pistacia chinensis Coolibah SP P N MS M MMI,L,W,P N HE T Eucalyptus microtheca Coral Gum N/A R,Y Y SS S M L T,D,P,L N HE D Eucalyptus torquata Desert Fern SP C N S/M S S/M ML L NSE D Lysiloma thornberi Desert Willow SP/SU P/Prp Y S N/M S ML L NHD D Chilopsis linearis Eldarica Pine N/A N LS L FM P NHE T Pinus eldarica Foothills Palo Verde SP C Y S S/M S ML L SHD D Parkinsonia microphylla Hybrid Mesquite SU C N MS M FL L V H S T/D Prosopis spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwestern Trees
    I SOUTHWESTERN TREES A Guide to the Native Species of New Mexico and Arizona Agriculture Handbook No. 9 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service SOUTHWESTERN TREES A Guide to the Native Species of New Mexico and Arizona By ELBERT L. LITTLE, JR., Forester (Dendrology) FOREST SERVICE Agriculture Handbook No. 9 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DECEMBER 1950 Reviewed and approved for reprinting August 1968 For sale by the Superintendent oí Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - CONTENTS Page Page Introduction . 1 Spurge family (Euphorbiaceae) . 76 Vegetation of New Mexico and Cashew family (Anacardiaceae) . 78 Arizona 4 Bittersweet family (Celastraceae) 79 Forests of New Mexico and Arizona 9 Maple family (Aceraceae) .... 80 How to use this handbook 10 Soapberry family (Sapindaceae) . 82 Pine family (Pinaceae) .-..,.. 10 Buckthorn family (Rhamnaceae) . 83 Palm family (Palmae) 24 Sterculla family (Sterculiaceae) . 86 Lily family (Liliaceae) 26 Tamarisk family (Tamaricaceae) . 86 Willow family (Salicaceae) .... 31 Allthorn family (Koeberliniaceae) 88 Walnut family (Juglandaceae) . 42 Cactus family (Cactaceae) .... 88 Birch family (Betulaceae) .... 44 Dogwood family (Cornaceae) . , 95 Beech family (Fagaceae) .... 46 Heath family (Ericaceae) .... 96 Elm family (Ulmaceae) 53 Sapote family (Sapotaceae) ... 97 Mulberry family (Moraceae) ... 54 Olive family (Oleaceae) 98 Sycamore family (Platanaceae) . 54 Nightshade family (Solanaceae) . 101 Rose family (Rosaceae) 55 Bignonia family (Bignoniaceae) . 102 Legume family (Leguminosae) . 63 Honeysuckle family (Caprifo- liaceae) 103 Rue family (Rutaceae) 73 Selected references 104 Ailanthus family (Simaroubaceae) 74 Index of common and scientific Bur sera family (Burseraceae) . 75 names 106 11 SOUTHWESTERN TREES A Guide to the Native Species of New Mexico and Arizona INTRODUCTION The Southwest, where the low, hot, barren Mexican deserts meet the lofty, cool, forested Rocky Mountains in New Mexico and Ari- zona, has an unsuspected richness of native trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Olneya Tesota A
    Olneya tesota A. Gray Fabaceae - Papilionoideae LOCAL NAMES English (tesota,desert ironwood) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Olneya tesota is a conspicuous small tree up to 10 m in height, commonly with several trunks. The trunks can attain a diameter up to 60 cm on very old individuals. Young twigs up to 10 or 15 mm thick, green. Bark grey and smooth, fissured and shredding on older trunks. Sharp, paired spines, 3- 11 mm long at nodes. Leaves simple, pinnately compound up to 6-cm long; leaflets 6-20 greyish- green in colour, 7-20 mm long. Ten or fewer pairs of leaflets to 1 cm long; spines at base of leaves, paired, slightly curved, 0.6 cm long, and usually brown-tipped. Foliage evergreen to semi-deciduous. Flowers pink to lavender, papilionaceous; 15 mm long, appearing in short, dense racemes or panicles in late spring. Mature pods dehiscent, several seeded. Seeds 5-6 mm in diameter. The genus Olneya is monospecific and can be easily mistaken for Palo Verde (Cercidium spp.) but has a greyer color and lacks the distinctive yellow flowers in spring. BIOLOGY Flowering is prolific every two in five years, usually late in spring, pods ripen in summer. Agroforestry Database 4.0 (Orwa et al.2009) Page 1 of 5 Olneya tesota A. Gray Fabaceae - Papilionoideae ECOLOGY O. tesota is a dominant component of many plant communities. It is usually restricted to dry desert watercourses, sandy and rocky soils of plains, slopes and along dry washes, where storm runoff increases the available moisture. The largest individuals are found in these habitats, often forming woodlands with other desert trees including Cercidium floridum, Prosopis glandulosa var.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnegiea Gigantea) in the Western Sonora
    Association Between Nurse Plants and Saguaros (Carnegiea gigantea) in the Western Sonora C. Hinojo-Hinojo, C. Trujillo-López, O. Calva-Pérez, O. Galaz-García, A. E. Castellanos-Villegas Departamento de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico Abstract—The objectives in this work were to determine nurse species associated with the saguaro, as well as the diversity of plant species in the saguaro patch. We also recorded the presence of termites on saguaro green tissues to evaluate their existence and possible causes for their presence. At each site a point-centered quarter transect was used, where the data on the closet saguaros were taken for size and height, percent litter soil coverage, and termite activity, as well as floristic composition, plant species cover, and the dimension of the associated patch of vegetation. Data on 55 saguaros showed the most common nurse species were Larrea tridentata, Olneya tesota, Parkinsonia microphylla, and Ambrosia deltoidea. Twenty-one (21) saguaro individuals were found distributed in different patches where Olneya tesota and Parkinsonia microphylla showed the most species diversity. Termite activity was present in saguaros with little or no litter cover in the soil. This is the first work focusing on the causes for the increase of termite invasion of live saguaro tissues. Introduction Materials and Methods Cacti are a diverse family and include about 2,000 species, which Sampled sites were located in the northwestern region of the are often endemic and unique elements of the arid and semi-arid areas State of Sonora, near Puerto Libertad. We selected three sites that of America (Drezner and Lazarus 2008; Godinez-Alvarez and others had been previously sampled (Castellanos and others 2010b), in 2003; Hunt and others 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Growth of Legume Tree Species Growing in the Southwestern United States
    Growth of Legume Tree Species Growing in the Southwestern United States Ursula K. Schuch1 and Margaret Norem2 Plant Sciences Department1 and Desert Legume Program2 University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 Abstract Vegetative shoot growth of eleven legume tree species growing under field conditions in the Southwestern United States in Arizona were monitored over two periods of twelve months. Species included plants native to the Southwestern United States, Mexico, South America, and Australia. Based on shoot extension and branch differentiation species could be grouped into three categories. Fast growing legumes included Acacia farnesiana, A. pendula, Olneya tesota, Parkinsonia floridum, and Prosopis chilensis. Intermediate growth rates were monitored for A. jennerae, A. salicina, and A. visco. Slow growing species in this study included A. stenophylla, P. microphylla, and P. praecox. No buds, flowers, or pods were observed for P. microphylla, O. tesota, and P. chilensis during the study. Of the remaining species those native to the Americas flowered in spring and those native to Australia flowered in fall or winter. Introduction Southwestern landscapes, characterized by a semiarid climate and poor soils, rely on many native and non- native legume species for shade and aesthetic value. Desirable traits of trees for desert landscapes include fast growth, drought tolerance, and resistance to biotic stresses. In addition, cultivated trees are prized for showy flowers, little or no litter, lack of spines, and an upright growth habit (Dimmitt, 1987). Of the 11 species used in this study, six are commonly planted in the northern Sonoran Desert at low and mid elevations. The other species are used in the same area to a lesser extent, although they grow well in a semi-arid climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised BO Format (June 2005)
    1 United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Field Office 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 Fax: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer to: AESO/SE 22410-2009-F-0452 April 12, 2010 Memorandum To: Linda Dansby, Abandoned Mine Lands ARRA Program Manager, National Park Service, Intermountain Region, Santa Fe, New Mexico From: Field Supervisor Subject: Biological Opinion on a Proposal to Close Abandoned Mine Lands (AMLs) within Coronado National Memorial, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Saguaro National Park, and Grand Canyon National Park Thank you for your request for formal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (Act). Your request was dated February 11, 2010, and received by us on February 16, 2010. At issue are impacts that may result from the proposed closure of Abandoned Mine Lands within Coronado National Memorial, Grand Canyon National Park, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, and Saguaro National Park located in Cochise, Coconino, Mohave, and Pima counties, Arizona. The proposed action will adversely affect the endangered lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae). In your correspondence, you requested our concurrence that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect the lesser long-nosed bat (in Saguaro National Park only), the threatened Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) with critical habitat, the endangered Sonoran pronghorn (Antilocapra americana sonoriensis), the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), and endangered California condor (Gymnogyps californianus).
    [Show full text]
  • Plant ID Guide
    Plant Identification Guide To the Common Trees, Shrubs, and Cacti of the Phoenix-Area Desert © 2008, 2010 Udo M. Savalli The Phoenix area contains numerous city parks as well as surrounding desert areas that are characteristic of the Arizona Upland division of Sonoran Desert scrub. Typical areas include Thunderbird Park in Glen- dale, Piestewa Peak and South Mountain preserves, among others, in Phoenix, and White Tanks Park. These areas are dominated by shrubs such as creosote bush (Larrea tridentata), bursage (Ambrosia spp.) and brittlebush (Encelia farinosa), small trees such as palo verdes (Parkinsonia spp.) and catclaw acacia (Acacia greggii) and various cacti. This guide is designed to introduce you to the most common woody plants in these parks. It is in no way complete and does not cover riparian vegetation. Trees The majority of the trees and large shrubs in the Sonoran desert belong to the family Leguminosae (also called Fabaceae). This family is characterized by having distinctive fruits that form a two-part pod (leg- ume). Most local legumes also have compound leaves, meaning that each leaf is actually subdivided into numerous individual leaflets. Legumes are particularly important to ecosystems because their roots har- bor endosymbiotic Rhizobium bacteria that have the ability to fix nitrogen. Blue Paloverde, Parkinsonia florida (family Leguminosae). This species was formerly classified as Cercidium floridum. This species and the next can both be easily recognized even at a distance by their distinctive green bark. Blue paloverde leaflets are quite small, about 5mm, but larger than those of little- leaf paloverde. Furthermore, the fruits of blue paloverdes lack an obvious constric- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Subfamily Classification of The
    LPWG Phylogeny and classification of the Leguminosae TAXON 66 (1) • February 2017: 44–77 A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG) Recommended citation: LPWG (2017) This paper is a product of the Legume Phylogeny Working Group, who discussed, debated and agreed on the classification of the Leguminosae presented here, and are listed in alphabetical order. The text, keys and descriptions were written and compiled by a subset of authors indicated by §. Newly generated matK sequences were provided by a subset of authors indicated by *. All listed authors commented on and approved the final manuscript. Nasim Azani,1 Marielle Babineau,2* C. Donovan Bailey,3* Hannah Banks,4 Ariane R. Barbosa,5* Rafael Barbosa Pinto,6* James S. Boatwright,7* Leonardo M. Borges,8* Gillian K. Brown,9* Anne Bruneau,2§* Elisa Candido,6* Domingos Cardoso,10§* Kuo-Fang Chung,11* Ruth P. Clark,4 Adilva de S. Conceição,12* Michael Crisp,13* Paloma Cubas,14* Alfonso Delgado-Salinas,15 Kyle G. Dexter,16* Jeff J. Doyle,17 Jérôme Duminil,18* Ashley N. Egan,19* Manuel de la Estrella,4§* Marcus J. Falcão,20 Dmitry A. Filatov,21* Ana Paula Fortuna-Perez,22* Renée H. Fortunato,23 Edeline Gagnon,2* Peter Gasson,4 Juliana Gastaldello Rando,24* Ana Maria Goulart de Azevedo Tozzi,6 Bee Gunn,13* David Harris,25 Elspeth Haston,25 Julie A. Hawkins,26* Patrick S. Herendeen,27§ Colin E. Hughes,28§* João R.V. Iganci,29* Firouzeh Javadi,30* Sheku Alfred Kanu,31 Shahrokh Kazempour-Osaloo,32* Geoffrey C.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspecific Pollen Loads on Insects Visiting Female Flowers on Parasitic Phoradendron Californicum (Viscaceae)
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 76 Number 1 Article 11 3-31-2016 Conspecific pollen loads on insects visiting emalef flowers on parasitic Phoradendron californicum (Viscaceae) William D. Wiesenborn [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Wiesenborn, William D. (2016) "Conspecific pollen loads on insects visiting emalef flowers on parasitic Phoradendron californicum (Viscaceae)," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 76 : No. 1 , Article 11. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol76/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 76(1), © 2016, pp. 113–121 CONSPECIFIC POLLEN LOADS ON INSECTS VISITING FEMALE FLOWERS ON PARASITIC PHORADENDRON CALIFORNICUM (VISCACEAE) William D. Wiesenborn1 ABSTRACT.—Desert mistletoe, Phoradendron californicum (Viscaceae), is a dioecious parasitic plant that grows on woody legumes in the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts, produces minute flowers during winter, and is dispersed by birds defecating fruits. Pollination of desert mistletoe has not been examined despite the species’ reliance on insects for trans- porting pollen from male to female plants. I investigated the pollination of P. californicum parasitizing Acacia greggii (Fabaceae) shrubs at 3 sites at different elevations in the Mojave Desert of southern Nevada during February 2015. I examined pollen from male flowers, aspirated insects landing on female flowers, and counted pollen grains in insect pollen loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Creosote Bush Larrea Tridentata
    Sonoran Desert Lowest (elevation) and warmest of the North American deserts GREAT BASIN Two rainfall seasons—winter rains DESERT off the Pacific and summer Monsoon storms from moisture California pulled up largely from the Gulf of MOHAVE California (aka Sea of Cortez) DESERT Arizona Greatest biodiversity due to: SONORAN • Dual rainfall seasons DESERT • Variations in topography • Influence of Rocky Mountains/ Sierra Madre Occidental, Great Baja California Plains, Tropical Deciduous Forest, Oregon CHIHUAHUAN etc. DESERT Covers parts of two states in the Baja California Sur US and three in Mexico More than 2,000 described plant species! Arizona Upland Highest, coolest, and one of the wettest subdivisions Saguaro Carnegiea gigantea “Columnar” Cactus • 30 to 50 feet tall • Can reach ages over 200 years Arizona’s State Flower! Tohono O’odham Organ Pipe Cactus Stenocereus thurberi Senita Cactus Lophocereus schottii Senita Moth Upiga virescens Arizona or Fishhook Barrel Cactus Ferocactus wislizenii 8 to 12 feet tall May lean to the southwest Prickly Pear Sprawling Opuntia spp. Prickly Pear O. phaeacantha Engelmann Prickly Pear O. engelmannii Santa Rita Prickly Pear O. santa-rita Cholla Cylindropuntia spp. Teddy Bear Cholla C. bigelovii Chainfruit or “Jumping” Cholla C. fulgida Cane Cholla C. spinosior Legumes: The Pea/Bean Family Fabaceae Contain symbiotic bacteria within nodules in their root systems •The bacteria produces nitrogen compounds that help the plant to grow and compete with other plants • When the plant dies, the “fixed” nitrogen • Seed pods (beans) is released making it are an important available to other food source for plants; this helps animals and desert fertilize the soil people! Palo Verde Arizona’s State Tree! Parkinsonia spp.
    [Show full text]