PHORADENDRON, VISCACEAE) by Vanessa E.T.M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PHORADENDRON, VISCACEAE) by Vanessa E.T.M IAWA Journal, Vol. 18 (3),1997: 229-245 WOOD ANATOMY OF FOUR CALIFORNIAN MISTLETOE SPECIES (PHORADENDRON, VISCACEAE) by Vanessa E.T.M. Ashworth & Gracielza Dos Santos Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA 917ll, U. S. A. SUMMARY Secondary xylem characteristics were compared in four species of Phor­ adendron Nutt. (Viscaceae) native to Califomia. All have extremely short, thick-walled vessel elements with simple perforation plates. They also share high vessel density, radial vessel arrangement, thick-walled fibres, and multiseriate, heterocellular rays. The fibres show considerable in­ trusive growth. Features of the vessel elements (i.e. vessel dimensions, arrangement, type of wall sculpturing) and calcium oxalate crystals in the ray parenchyma cells are useful diagnostic traits to separate species. Grooved vessel walls are shared by the morphologically similar P. villosum and P. macrophyllum. Differences between these two spe­ cies may reflect contrasting drought response strategies pursued by respective hosts. Vulnerability and mesomorphy ratios of the wood of P. caZifomicum are higher than those of P. pauciflorum and P. macrophyl­ Zum. Phoradendron pauciflorum has the most xeromorphic wood of the four species studied. Key words: Phoradendron, Viscaceae, wood anatomy, parasitic plants, vessel wall sculpture, spiral thickenings, mesomorphy ratio, vulnerability ratio. INTRODUCTION Phoradendron Nutt. is a New World mistletoe in Viscaceae, a santalalean family of epiparasites that used to be treated as a subfamily of Loranthaceae s.l. Viscaceae was formally segregated from Loranthaceae by Barlow (1964) on the basis of embryology and is today generally seen as being a highly derived family, whereas Loranthaceae s.s. appears to be descended from Olacaceae, the basal family within the order (Kuijt 1968; Nickrent & Duff 1996). Phoradendron has a wide distribution, extending from a centre of diversity in Meso­ america into temperate latitudes to the north and south. Its members parasitize mainly arborescent angiosperms and occasionally conifers by forming connections with the host xylem. Phoradendron species occur in a multitude of disparate environments, ranging from tropical to desert and lowland to montane habitats. In general, the wood of epiparasites is xeromorphic (Carlquist 1975, 1977; Carlquist & Hoekman 1985), but has relatively high vulnerability ratios (vessel diameter divided by vessel density Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 02:36:10PM via free access 230 IAWA Journal, Vol. 18 (3), 1997 per mm2; Carlquist 1977) eompared with non-parasitie xerophytes, The ability of wood attributes to refleet eeological eonditions is abundantly doeumented (e. g. Baas et al. 1983; Carlquist 1975, 1977). However, selective pressures are exerted not only by cli­ mate but also arise from the parasitic lifestyle and a need to adapt to a partieular host (Atsatt 1983). Many anatomical studies of epiparasites are devoted to the host parasite interface (e.g.,Alosi & Calvin 1985; Calvin 1967; Calvin et al. 1991; Calvin & Wilson 1995; Salle 1979; Sehmid & Lindeman 1979; Srivastava & Esau 1961; Thoday 1956, 1957, 1960). Evidenee of a direct influence of the host on the wood anatomy of the parasite has been presented for two members of Loranthaceae (Patel 1991). The systematic utility of wood anatomie al features for Phoradendron is the focus of our work. Only a few studies of epiparasites (e. g. Beaman 1971; Carlquist 1985; Patel 1974,1991; Smith & Gledhilll983) have used wood anatomical traits for diagnostic/ systematic purposes. Phoradendron has a troubled taxonomie history, in part a eonse­ quence of the highly reduced floral organs that offer littIe help in interspeeific differen­ tiation. Trelease (1916), the monographer of the genus, eireumseribed many species and higher taxonomie ranks on the basis of variable taxonomie eharacters, such as leaf size and shape. As we now know, however, leaves in Phoradendron are particularly subject to phenotypic plasticity. Today many ofTrelease's speeies (some 240) are plaeed in synonymy and his supraspecifie ranks are largely dismissed as invalid or unnatural. Regional revisions of Phoradendron (e.g. Wiens 1964) have reexamined some of Trelease's sections. Our study covers four speeies representing three ofWiens' (1964) sections. We have not sampled a suffieient number of species to permit validation or refutation of his sections, but our work does enable us to look for attributes of the wood that follow sectional boundaries. Moreover, we diseuss anatomical features of the wood in terms of ecology and influences exerted by the host. Given the eomplex nature of wood we believe that any interpretation of its anatomy needs to take aceount of all contributing factors (Baas 1982; Carlquist 1977). The four species included in this study are: Phoradendron californicum Nutt. (desert mistletoe); P. macrophyllum (Engelrn.) Coekerell (big leafmistIetoe); P. villosum (Nutt.) Nutt. (oak mistIetoe); and P. pauciflorum Torrey (fir mistIetoe). These taxa exhibit a range of adaptive strategies, especially reflecting differences in host range (broad ver­ sus narrow), host phenology (deciduous versus evergreen; broadleaved versus conif­ erous) and climatic adaptation (desert versus riparian, low versus high altitude) (Table 1). Phoradendron pauciflorum is a parasite of Abies concolor, a conifer oecur­ ring mainly at altitudes of 1700-3300 metres (the speeimens used in this study origi­ nated at an altitude of 2100-2300 metres). The leaves in P. pauciflorum are 0.5-2.5 cm long and 0.5-0.8 em wide. Phoradendron californicum, by contrast, parasitizes a range of desert shrubs and trees, especially leguminous taxa, such as Prosopis, Acacia, Cercidium, Olneya, and oeeasionally Larrea tridentata. It is eharaeterized by seale­ like leaves. The other two speeies, P. macrophyllum and P. villosum, are morphologi­ eally similar, both having large obovate leaves (3.0-4.2 cm long, 1.5-2.3 cm wide; 1.5-4.7 cm long, 1.0-2.5 em wide, respectively), comparable intemode lengths and similar inflorescence and fruit eharacteristics. Their distinctness derives from minor differences in degree and type of leaf and stern pubescenee, contrasting phenology Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 02:36:10PM via free access Ashworth & Dos Santos - Wood anatomy of Phoradendron 231 Table 1. Host ecology. Phoradendron Host Host Host alti- Host phenology habitat tude (m) P. californicum Prosopis glandulosa (Fabaceae) deciduous desert 1100 Acacia greggii (Fabaceae) deciduous desert 600-800 Acacia sp. deciduous desert 600 P. macrophyllum Cinnamomum camphora (Lauraceae) deciduous irrigated 200 Fraxinus velutina (Oleaceae) deciduous riparian 400 Fraxinus sp. deciduous riparian 1100 Platanus racemosa (Platanaceae) deciduous riparian 400 Robinia pseudoacacia (Fabaceae) deciduous riparian 300 P. paucijlorum Abies concolor (Pinaceae) evergreen subalpine 2100-2300 P. villosum Quercus lobata (Fagaceae) deciduous woodland 270 Quercus wislizenii var.frutescens evergreen woodland 400 Quercus spp. evergreen or woodland 1500 deciduous (flowering period in December-March and July-September, respectively) and host preference. Phoradendron macrophyllum is an avowed generalist parasitizing broad­ leaved trees belonging to distantly related families, such as the Platanaceae (Platanus), Oleaceae (Fraxinus) and Lauraceae (Cinnamomum camphora ). Phoradendron villosum is rarely found on hosts other than Quercus. The nomenclature we use for Phoradendron follows Hawksworth and Wiens (1993). Nomenclatural variants in common use today exist for all taxa but P. californicum. Phoradendron macrophyllum and P. villosum, in particular, are sometimes cited as P. flavescens (Pursh) Nutt. var. macrophyllum Enge1m. and P. flavescens (Pursh) Nutt. var. villosum (Nutt.) Engelrn., respectively (Munz 1959). Wiens (1964) made the new combinationP. tomentosum (DC.) Enge1m. subsp. macrophyllum (Engelrn.) Wiens but retained P. villosum (Nutt.) Nutt. MATERIALS AND METHODS Collection data and voucher specimens are cited at the end of each species description. Following the collector's number is the collection date and the stern diameter (in pa­ rentheses). Voucher specimens and wood sampies are deposited at Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden. Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 02:36:10PM via free access 232 IAWA Journal, Vol. 18 (3),1997 Fig. 1-4. Phoradendron califomicum. - 1: Columbus 2464, transverse seetion, vessels in radial multiples, two or more radial ehains arranged side by side, distinet growth ring; seale bar = 100 J1Ill. - 2: Columbus 2464, tangential seetion, storied vessel elements and axial parenehyma; sea1e bar = 100 J1Ill. - 3: Ashworth 103, radial seetion, heterocellu1ar rays composed ofprocum­ bent, square, and upright eeHs mixed; seale bar = 250 J1Ill. - 4: Ashworth 81, SEM mierograph, eoarse spiral thiekenings in vessel element; seale bar = 10 J1Ill. - In Fig. 1: g = growth ring. Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 02:36:10PM via free access Ashworth & Dos Santos - Wood anatomy of Phoradendron 233 Fig. 5-8. Phoradendron macrophyllum. - 5: Ashworth 64, transverse section, patches of very thick-walled fibres; scale bar = 250 Iffil. - 6: Ashworth 76, tangential seetion, thick-walled and somewhat contorted fibres, wide rays, and storied to irregularly storied vessel elements and axial parenchyma; scale bar =100 Iffil. - 7: Ashworth 76, druses in pith cells; scale bar = 40 Iffil. - 8: Ashworth 65, SEM micrograph, grooves forrned by interconnecting pit apertures in vessel element;
Recommended publications
  • Plant Communities & Habitats
    Plant Communities & Habitats CLASS READINGS Key to Common Trees of Bouverie Preserve Bouverie Vegetation Map This class will be held Deciduous & Evergreen Oaks of Bouverie Preserve almost entirely on the trail so dress Sun Leaves & Shade Leaves accordingly and bring Characteristics of the Oaks of Bouverie Preserve plenty of water Chaparral & Fire (California’s Changing Landscapes, Michael Barbour et.al., 1993) Bouverie Preserve Chaparral (DeNevers) ACR Fire Ecology Program Mixed Evergreen Forest (California’s Changing Landscapes, Michael Barbour et.al., 1993) Ecological Tolerances of Riparian Plants (River Partners) Call of the Galls (Bay Nature Magazine, Ron Russo, 2009) Oak Galls of Bouverie Preserve Leaves of Three (Bay Nature Magazine, Eaton & Sullivan, 2013) Mistletoe – Magical, Mysterious, & Misunderstood (Wirka) How Old is This Twig (Wirka) CALNAT: California Naturalist Handbook Chapter 4 (98-109, 114-115) Chapter 5 (117-138) Key Concepts By the end of this class, we hope you will be able to: Use a simple key to identify trees at Bouverie Preserve, Look around you and determine whether you are in oak woodland, mixed evergreen forest, riparian woodland, or chaparral -- and get a “feel” for each, Define: Plant Community, Habitat, Ecotone; understand how to discuss/investigate each with students, Stand under a large oak and guide students in exploring/discovering the many species that live on/around it, Find a gall on an oak leaf or twig and get excited about the lifecycle of the critters who live inside, Explain how chaparral plants are fire-adapted and look for evidence of these adaptations, Locate at least one granary tree and notice acorn woodpeckers that are guarding it, List some of the animals that rely on Bouverie’s oak woodland habitat, and Make an acorn whistle & count the years a twig has been growing SEQUOIA CLUB Resources When one tugs at a In the Bouverie Library single thing in nature, he A Manual of California Vegetation, second edition, finds it attached to the John Sawyer and Todd Keeler‐ Wolf (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site
    Powell, Schmidt, Halvorson In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Plant and Vertebrate Vascular U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Open-File Report 2005-1167 Southwest Biological Science Center Open-File Report 2005-1167 February 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site By Brian F. Powell, Cecilia A. Schmidt , and William L. Halvorson Open-File Report 2005-1167 December 2006 USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web:http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested Citation Powell, B. F, C. A. Schmidt, and W. L. Halvorson. 2006. Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Mistletoes: Pathogens, Keystone Resource, and Medicinal Wonder Abstracts
    Mistletoes: Pathogens, Keystone Resource, and Medicinal Wonder Abstracts Oral Presentations Phylogenetic relationships in Phoradendron (Viscaceae) Vanessa Ashworth, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Keywords: Phoradendron, Systematics, Phylogenetics Phoradendron Nutt. is a genus of New World mistletoes comprising ca. 240 species distributed from the USA to Argentina and including the Antillean islands. Taxonomic treatments based on morphology have been hampered by phenotypic plasticity, size reduction of floral parts, and a shortage of taxonomically useful traits. Morphological characters used to differentiate species include the arrangement of flowers on an inflorescence segment (seriation) and the presence/absence and pattern of insertion of cataphylls on the stem. The only trait distinguishing Phoradendron from Dendrophthora Eichler, another New World mistletoe genus with a tropical distribution contained entirely within that of Phoradendron, is the number of anther locules. However, several lines of evidence suggest that neither Phoradendron nor Dendrophthora is monophyletic, although together they form the strongly supported monophyletic tribe Phoradendreae of nearly 360 species. To date, efforts to delineate supraspecific assemblages have been largely unsuccessful, and the only attempt to apply molecular sequence data dates back 16 years. Insights gleaned from that study, which used the ITS region and two partitions of the 26S nuclear rDNA, will be discussed, and new information pertinent to the systematics and biology of Phoradendron will be reviewed. The Viscaceae, why so successful? Clyde Calvin, University of California, Berkeley Carol A. Wilson, The University and Jepson Herbaria, University of California, Berkeley Keywords: Endophytic system, Epicortical roots, Epiparasite Mistletoe is the term used to describe aerial-branch parasites belonging to the order Santalales.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Mistletoe (Phoradendron Villosum)
    Downloaded from http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 20, 2018 Population ecology Effects of mistletoe (Phoradendron rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org villosum) on California oaks Walter D. Koenig1,2, Johannes M. H. Knops3, William J. Carmen4, Mario B. Pesendorfer1 and Janis L. Dickinson1 Research 1Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA 2 Cite this article: Koenig WD, Knops JMH, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 3School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA Carmen WJ, Pesendorfer MB, Dickinson JL. 4Carmen Ecological Consulting, 145 Eldridge Avenue, Mill Valley, CA 94941, USA 2018 Effects of mistletoe (Phoradendron WDK, 0000-0001-6207-1427 villosum) on California oaks. Biol. Lett. 14: 20180240. Mistletoes are a widespread group of plants often considered to be hemipar- http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0240 asitic, having detrimental effects on growth and survival of their hosts. We studied the effects of the Pacific mistletoe, Phoradendron villosum, a member of a largely autotrophic genus, on three species of deciduous California oaks. We found no effects of mistletoe presence on radial growth or survivorship Received: 7 April 2018 and detected a significant positive relationship between mistletoe and acorn Accepted: 31 May 2018 production. This latter result is potentially explained by the tendency of P. villosum to be present on larger trees growing in nitrogen-rich soils or, alternatively, by a preference for healthy, acorn-producing trees by birds that potentially disperse mistletoe. Our results indicate that the negative con- sequences of Phoradendron presence on their hosts are negligible—this Subject Areas: species resembles an epiphyte more than a parasite—and outweighed by ecology the important ecosystem services mistletoe provides.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Yaqui Watershed, Northwestern Mexico: Use and Management 1
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Rio Yaqui Watershed, Northwestern Mexico: Use and Management 1 Luis Bojorquez2, Raymundo Aguirre3 and Alfredo Ortega4 Abstract.-- This paper describes the uses and communi­ ty types of the Rio Yaqui Watershed in Sonora Mexico. The management problems are interrelated but there are no stud­ ies of sufficient regional scope to integrate the uses of the area. To cope with this, research activities associated with management have to be multidisciplinary. INTRODUCTION The use of an ecosystems often influ~ ences other natural systems (Ffolliott The State of Sonora, Mexico, is loca­ 1980). Riparian ecosystems utilization ted on the northwestern corner of The impact, and is impacted by, other uses of Mexican Republic. It is limited by the their basin. For this reason a study was Sierra Madre Occidental, on the east, by made to describe the vegetational community the State of Arizona on the north, by the types that occur in the Rio Yaqui Watershed state of Sinaloa, on the south, and by the and their sometimes conflicting usage. Gulf of California, on the east. Agriculture, ranching, mining, fores­ Sonora presents two main landforms: try, and recreation are the principal land uses at present (SAHOP 1980) and larger im­ Northwestern Coastal Plain.- It ex­ pacts and conflicts can be expected in the tenrls from the outlet of the Colorado future. Basic research is needed to recon­ River to the south along the coast. and cile apparently antagonistic requirements of individual components of some multipur­ Sierra Madre Occidental.- It is ad­ pose combinations (King 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern
    Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants (Twenty-second Edition) CNPS, Rare Plant Program David L. Magney Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants1 By David L. Magney California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program, Locally Rare Project Updated 4 January 2017 Ventura County is located in southern California, USA, along the east edge of the Pacific Ocean. The coastal portion occurs along the south and southwestern quarter of the County. Ventura County is bounded by Santa Barbara County on the west, Kern County on the north, Los Angeles County on the east, and the Pacific Ocean generally on the south (Figure 1, General Location Map of Ventura County). Ventura County extends north to 34.9014ºN latitude at the northwest corner of the County. The County extends westward at Rincon Creek to 119.47991ºW longitude, and eastward to 118.63233ºW longitude at the west end of the San Fernando Valley just north of Chatsworth Reservoir. The mainland portion of the County reaches southward to 34.04567ºN latitude between Solromar and Sequit Point west of Malibu. When including Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands, the southernmost extent of the County occurs at 33.21ºN latitude and the westernmost extent at 119.58ºW longitude, on the south side and west sides of San Nicolas Island, respectively. Ventura County occupies 480,996 hectares [ha] (1,188,562 acres [ac]) or 4,810 square kilometers [sq. km] (1,857 sq. miles [mi]), which includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. The mainland portion of the county is 474,852 ha (1,173,380 ac), or 4,748 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of the Vegetation Alliances and Associations of Sonoma County, California
    Classification of the Vegetation Alliances and Associations of Sonoma County, California Volume 1 of 2 – Introduction, Methods, and Results Prepared by: California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program California Native Plant Society Vegetation Program For: The Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District The Sonoma County Water Agency Authors: Anne Klein, Todd Keeler-Wolf, and Julie Evens December 2015 ABSTRACT This report describes 118 alliances and 212 associations that are found in Sonoma County, California, comprising the most comprehensive local vegetation classification to date. The vegetation types were defined using a standardized classification approach consistent with the Survey of California Vegetation (SCV) and the United States National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) system. This floristic classification is the basis for an integrated, countywide vegetation map that the Sonoma County Vegetation Mapping and Lidar Program expects to complete in 2017. Ecologists with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the California Native Plant Society analyzed species data from 1149 field surveys collected in Sonoma County between 2001 and 2014. The data include 851 surveys collected in 2013 and 2014 through funding provided specifically for this classification effort. An additional 283 surveys that were conducted in adjacent counties are included in the analysis to provide a broader, regional understanding. A total of 34 tree-overstory, 28 shrubland, and 56 herbaceous alliances are described, with 69 tree-overstory, 51 shrubland, and 92 herbaceous associations. This report is divided into two volumes. Volume 1 (this volume) is composed of the project introduction, methods, and results. It includes a floristic key to all vegetation types, a table showing the full local classification nested within the USNVC hierarchy, and a crosswalk showing the relationship between this and other classification systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting Desert Shade Trees
    Your one-stop guide to a variety of shade trees that grow well in the dry Arizona ARIZONA DESERT SHADE TREES Sonoran Desert environment. Frost Potential Growth Water Possible Tree Benefits Height Shape Spread Toler- Planting Rate Usage Problems Type ance Areas orked, P=Pyramidal, N=Narrow, Mature Specimens at Desert Botanical Garden? Thorny: V=Very, M=Moderate, S=Slightly, N=No Thorns Hardiness: Degrees Fahrenheit S=Semi-Hardy, H=Hardy E=Evergreen, S=Semi- deciduous, D=Deciduous D=Desert T=Turf, Native Arizona Shade Tree Beneficial to Native Wildlife Heaviest Bloom Season: SP=Spring, SU=Summer, F=Fall, W=Winter Flower Color: C=Cream, W=White, R=Red Prp=Purple, P=Pink, Y=Yellow, Okay to Grow Near Electric Lines? Y = Yes, N = No S=<25', M=25-40', L=>40' S-Spreading, M=Multi/Trunked/Low- f C=Conical S=<25', M=25-40', L=>40' S=Slow, M=Medium, F=Fast L=Low, M=Medium Rot, Root T=Texas Chlorosis, I=Iron D=Other Diseases, P=Pests, L=Litter, W=Wind Damage, In=Invasive Roots Aleppo Pine N/A N L S LMMD,P N H E T Pinus halepensis Blue Palo Verde SP Y N M S/M M ML L MHD D Parkinsonia florida Cascalote WY Y SS S F L P,L V 28/S S T/D Parkinsonia caesalpinia Chinese Elm SU/F N LS L M M T,L N HS T Ulmus parvifolia Chinese Pistache SU N LS L M M T,L N HD T Pistacia chinensis Coolibah SP P N MS M MMI,L,W,P N HE T Eucalyptus microtheca Coral Gum N/A R,Y Y SS S M L T,D,P,L N HE D Eucalyptus torquata Desert Fern SP C N S/M S S/M ML L NSE D Lysiloma thornberi Desert Willow SP/SU P/Prp Y S N/M S ML L NHD D Chilopsis linearis Eldarica Pine N/A N LS L FM P NHE T Pinus eldarica Foothills Palo Verde SP C Y S S/M S ML L SHD D Parkinsonia microphylla Hybrid Mesquite SU C N MS M FL L V H S T/D Prosopis spp.
    [Show full text]
  • California Forest Insect and Disease Training Manual
    California Forest Insect and Disease Training Manual This document was created by US Forest Service, Region 5, Forest Health Protection and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Forest Pest Management forest health specialists. The following publications and references were used for guidance and supplemental text: Forest Insect and Disease Identification and Management (training manual). North Dakota Forest Service, US Forest Service, Region 1, Forest Health Protection, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation and Idaho Department of Lands. Forest Insects and Diseases, Natural Resources Institute. US Forest Service, Region 6, Forest Health Protection. Forest Insect and Disease Leaflets. USDA Forest Service Furniss, R.L., and Carolin, V.M. 1977. Western forest insects. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication 1339. 654 p. Goheen, E.M. and E.A. Willhite. 2006. Field Guide to Common Disease and Insect Pests of Oregon and Washington Conifers. R6-NR-FID-PR-01-06. Portland, OR. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 327 p. M.L. Fairweather, McMillin, J., Rogers, T., Conklin, D. and B Fitzgibbon. 2006. Field Guide to Insects and Diseases of Arizona and New Mexico. USDA Forest Service. MB-R3-16-3. Pest Alerts. USDA Forest Service. Scharpf, R. F., tech coord. 1993. Diseases of Pacific Coast Conifers. USDA For. Serv. Ag. Hndbk. 521. 199 p.32, 58. Tree Notes Series. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Wood, D.L., T.W. Koerber, R.F. Scharpf and A.J. Storer, Pests of the Native California Conifers, California Natural History Series, University of California Press, 2003. Cover Photo: Don Owen. 1978. Yosemite Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwestern Trees
    I SOUTHWESTERN TREES A Guide to the Native Species of New Mexico and Arizona Agriculture Handbook No. 9 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service SOUTHWESTERN TREES A Guide to the Native Species of New Mexico and Arizona By ELBERT L. LITTLE, JR., Forester (Dendrology) FOREST SERVICE Agriculture Handbook No. 9 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DECEMBER 1950 Reviewed and approved for reprinting August 1968 For sale by the Superintendent oí Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - CONTENTS Page Page Introduction . 1 Spurge family (Euphorbiaceae) . 76 Vegetation of New Mexico and Cashew family (Anacardiaceae) . 78 Arizona 4 Bittersweet family (Celastraceae) 79 Forests of New Mexico and Arizona 9 Maple family (Aceraceae) .... 80 How to use this handbook 10 Soapberry family (Sapindaceae) . 82 Pine family (Pinaceae) .-..,.. 10 Buckthorn family (Rhamnaceae) . 83 Palm family (Palmae) 24 Sterculla family (Sterculiaceae) . 86 Lily family (Liliaceae) 26 Tamarisk family (Tamaricaceae) . 86 Willow family (Salicaceae) .... 31 Allthorn family (Koeberliniaceae) 88 Walnut family (Juglandaceae) . 42 Cactus family (Cactaceae) .... 88 Birch family (Betulaceae) .... 44 Dogwood family (Cornaceae) . , 95 Beech family (Fagaceae) .... 46 Heath family (Ericaceae) .... 96 Elm family (Ulmaceae) 53 Sapote family (Sapotaceae) ... 97 Mulberry family (Moraceae) ... 54 Olive family (Oleaceae) 98 Sycamore family (Platanaceae) . 54 Nightshade family (Solanaceae) . 101 Rose family (Rosaceae) 55 Bignonia family (Bignoniaceae) . 102 Legume family (Leguminosae) . 63 Honeysuckle family (Caprifo- liaceae) 103 Rue family (Rutaceae) 73 Selected references 104 Ailanthus family (Simaroubaceae) 74 Index of common and scientific Bur sera family (Burseraceae) . 75 names 106 11 SOUTHWESTERN TREES A Guide to the Native Species of New Mexico and Arizona INTRODUCTION The Southwest, where the low, hot, barren Mexican deserts meet the lofty, cool, forested Rocky Mountains in New Mexico and Ari- zona, has an unsuspected richness of native trees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mistletoes a Literature Review
    THE MISTLETOES A LITERATURE REVIEW Technical Bulletin No. 1242 June 1961 U.S. DEi>ARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE THE MISTLETOES A LITERATURE REVIEW by Lake S. Gill and Frank G. Hawksworth Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Forest Service Growth Through Agricultural Progress Technical Bulletin No. 1242 June 1961 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON, D.C For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. - Price 35 cents Preface striking advances have been made in recent years in the field of plant pathology, but most of these investigations have dealt with diseases caused by fungi, bacteria, or viruses. In contrast, progress toward an understanding of diseases caused by phanerogamic parasites has been relatively slow. Dodder (Cuscuta spp.) and broom rape {Orohanche spp.) are well-known parasites of agri- cultural crops and are serious pests in certain localities. The recent introduction of witchweed (Striga sp.) a potentially serious pest for corn-growing areas, into the United States (Gariss and Wells 1956) emphasizes the need for more knowledge of phanerogamic parasites. The mistletoes, because of their unusual growth habits, have been the object of curiosity for thousands of years. Not until the present century, however, has their role as damaging pests to forest, park, orchard, and ornamental trees become apparent. The mistletoes are most abundant in tropical areas, but they are also widely distributed in the temperate zone. The peak of destructive- ness of this family seems to be reached in western North America where several species of the highly parasitic dwarfmistletoes (Arceuthobium spp,) occur.
    [Show full text]