DOCSLIB.ORG

California Forest Insect and Disease Training Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

California Forest Insect and Disease Training Manual This document was created by US Forest Service, Region 5, Forest Health Protection and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Forest Pest Management forest health specialists. The following publications and references were used for guidance and supplemental text: Forest Insect and Disease Identification and Management (training manual). North Dakota Forest Service, US Forest Service, Region 1, Forest Health Protection, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation and Idaho Department of Lands. Forest Insects and Diseases, Natural Resources Institute. US Forest Service, Region 6, Forest Health Protection. Forest Insect and Disease Leaflets. USDA Forest Service Furniss, R.L., and Carolin, V.M. 1977. Western forest insects. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication 1339. 654 p. Goheen, E.M. and E.A. Willhite. 2006. Field Guide to Common Disease and Insect Pests of Oregon and Washington Conifers. R6-NR-FID-PR-01-06. Portland, OR. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 327 p. M.L. Fairweather, McMillin, J., Rogers, T., Conklin, D. and B Fitzgibbon. 2006. Field Guide to Insects and Diseases of Arizona and New Mexico. USDA Forest Service. MB-R3-16-3. Pest Alerts. USDA Forest Service. Scharpf, R. F., tech coord. 1993. Diseases of Pacific Coast Conifers. USDA For. Serv. Ag. Hndbk. 521. 199 p.32, 58. Tree Notes Series. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Wood, D.L., T.W. Koerber, R.F. Scharpf and A.J. Storer, Pests of the Native California Conifers, California Natural History Series, University of California Press, 2003. Cover Photo: Don Owen. 1978. Yosemite Valley. California Forest Health Specialists US Forest Service, Forest Health Protection http://www.fs.usda.gov/main/r5/forest-grasslandhealth US Forest Service, Regional Office 1323 Club Drive, Vallejo, CA 94592; Phone: 5707-562-8921, FAX 707-562-9054 Sheri Smith, Regional Entomologist: [email protected]; Phone: 530-252-6667 Phil Cannon, Regional Pathologist: [email protected]; Phone 707-562-8913 Northeastern California Shared Service Area at the Lassen National Forest 2550 Riverside Drive, Susanville, CA 96130; Phone 530-257-2151, FAX 530-252-6428 Danny Cluck, Entomologist: [email protected]; Phone 530-252-6431 Bill Woodruff, Pathologist: [email protected]; Phone 530-252-6680 Northern California Shared Service Area at Shasta-Trinity National Forest 3644 Avtech Parkway, Redding, CA 96002; Phone 530-226-2436; FAX 530-226-2485 Cynthia Snyder, Entomologist: [email protected]; Phone 530-226-2437 South Sierra Shared Service Area at Stanislaus National Forest 19777 Greenley Road, Sonora, CA 95370; Phone 209-532-3671, FAX: 209-533-1890 Beverly Bulaon, Entomologist: [email protected]; Phone 209-532-3672 ext.323 Martin MacKenzie, Pathologist: [email protected]; Phone 209-532-3672 ext. 242 Southern California Shared Service Area at San Bernardino National Forest 602 S. Tippecanoe Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92406; Phone 909-382-2600, FAX 909-383-5770 Andrea Hefty, Entomologist: [email protected]; Phone 909-382-2871 Stacy Hishinuma, Entomologist: [email protected]; Phone 909-382-2620 State & Private Forestry, Forest Health Monitoring and Aviation Management 1731 Research Park Drive, Davis, CA 95616; Phone 530-759-1748, FAX 530-756-4324 Jeff Moore, Aerial Survey Program Manager; [email protected]; Phone 530-759-1753 Jackie Pope, Natural Resource Specialist; [email protected]; Phone 530-759-1751 State of California, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Forest Pest Management, http://www.fire.ca.gov CALFIRE State Headquarters 1416 Ninth Street, PO Box 944246, Sacramento 94244; Phone 916-653-5123 Forest Pest Management, CA Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection 2690 North State Street, Ukiah, CA 95482; Phone 707-462-5886 Chris Lee, Forest Health Specialist: [email protected] Forest Pest Management, CA Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection P.O. Box 944246, Sacramento, CA 94244; Phone 916-653-9476 Tom Smith, Forest Health Specialist: [email protected] Forest Pest Management, CA Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection 6105 Airport Road, Redding, CA 96002; Phone 916-201-7032 Curtis Ewing, Forest Health Specialist: [email protected] Forest Pest Management, CA Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection 880 Los Osos CA 95402; Phone 805-550-8583 Kim Corella, (previously Camilli), Forest Health Specialist: [email protected] Table of Contents INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT What is a Pest? ......................................................................................... 1 Pest – Ecosystem Interactions ............................................................. 1 What is Integrated Pest Management? ................................................ 2 The IPM Approach in Forest Pest Management .................................. 3 Implementation of Integrated Pest Management ................................. 3 Steps of Diagnosis .................................................................................... 5 Causes of Tree Injury ........................................................................... 5 Primary Agents vs. Secondary Agents ................................................. 5 Complexes are Common ..................................................................... 6 What’s Wrong With My Trees? ............................................................ 6 Searching For Clues ............................................................................ 6 Look For Symptoms, Signs, and Context ............................................ 6 Look For Patterns ................................................................................ 6 Diagnosis Steps ................................................................................... 7 Resources ............................................................................................ 8 DISEASES Forest Tree Diseases ................................................................................ 9 Insect/Disease Interactions .................................................................. 9 Roles of Pathogens In Forest Ecosystems .......................................... 10 Mistletoes .................................................................................................. 13 True Mistletoes ..................................................................................... 14 Dwarf Mistletoes ................................................................................... 16 Root Diseases ........................................................................................... 25 Heterobasidion Root Disease .............................................................. 28 Armillaria Root Disease ....................................................................... 34 Black Stain Root Disease .................................................................... 36 Phytophthora cinnamomi Root Disease............................................... 40 Port-Orford Cedar Root Disease ......................................................... 41 Sudden Oak Death ................................................................................... 43 Rusts ........................................................................................................ 47 White Pine Blister Rust ........................................................................ 48 Western Gall Rust ................................................................................ 52 Tree Decays ............................................................................................. 53 Red Ring Rot ....................................................................................... 58 Rust-Red Stringy Rot (Indian Paint Fungus) ....................................... 60 Dry Pocket Rot (Pecky Rot) ................................................................. 62 Red-Brown Root & Butt Rot (Schweinitzii Root & Butt Rot, Velvet-Top or Cow Pie Fungus) ........................................................... 64 Brown Trunk Rot (Quinine Fungus) ..................................................... 66 Brown Cubical Rot (Sulfur Fungus) ..................................................... 68 Gray-Brown Sap Rot (Pouch Fungus) ................................................. 69 Canker Diseases ...................................................................................... 70 Cytospora Canker ............................................................................... 71 Atropellis Canker ................................................................................. 72 Douglas-fir Cankers ............................................................................ 73 Nectria Canker of Fir ........................................................................... 74 Madrone Canker .................................................................................. 75 Seiridium Canker (Cypress Canker) .................................................... 77 Diplodia Blight ...................................................................................... 78 Pitch Canker ........................................................................................ 80 Foliage Diseases ...................................................................................... 82 Elytroderma Disease ........................................................................... 83 Lophodermella Needle Cast ................................................................ 85 Red Band Needle
Recommended publications
  • The Clon User Manual the Command-Line Options Nuker, Version 1.0 Beta 25 "Michael Brecker"

    The Clon User Manual the Command-Line Options Nuker, Version 1.0 Beta 25 "Michael Brecker"

    The Clon User Manual The Command-Line Options Nuker, Version 1.0 beta 25 "Michael Brecker" Didier Verna <[email protected]> Copyright c 2010{2012, 2015, 2017, 2020, 2021 Didier Verna Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all copies. Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided also that the section entitled \Copy- ing" is included exactly as in the original. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this manual into an- other language, under the above conditions for modified versions, except that this permission notice may be translated as well. Cover art by Alexis Angelidis. i Table of Contents Copying ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 1 1 Introduction :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 3 2 Installation:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 5 3 Quick Start ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 7 3.1 Full Source :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 7 3.2 Explanation ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 7 4 Using Clon :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 11 4.1 Synopsis Definition ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 11 4.1.1 Synopsis Items ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 11 4.1.1.1 Text ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
  • Field Bioassays of Synthetic Pheromones and Host Monoterpenes for Conophthorus Coniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

    Field Bioassays of Synthetic Pheromones and Host Monoterpenes for Conophthorus Coniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

    PHYSIOLXICAL AND CHEMICAL ECOLOGY Field Bioassays of Synthetic Pheromones and Host Monoterpenes for Conophthorus coniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) PETER DE GROOT,’ GART L. DEBARR,3 AND GORAN BIRGERSSON’,* Environ. Entomol. Z(2): 38-W (1998) ABSTRACT Four major monoterpenes, (i-)-cu-pinene, 1 (S)-( -)-/3-pinene, (R)-( t )-limonene, and myrcene are found in the cones of eastern white pines, Pinusstrobus L. Mixtures ofthese, as well as. u-pinene or P-pinene alone. increased catches of male white pine cone beetles, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwartz). in traps baited xvith the female sex pheromone, ( z)-trans-pityol. The mono- terpenes by themsekes as mistures or individually (a-pinene, /3-pinene) were not attractants for males or females. Traps baited with I r )-tram-pityol and wpinene caught as many, or significantly more beetles than those baited with pity01 and a four monoterpene mixture (1:l:l:l) used in seed orch‘ards in North Carolina, Ohio. and Virginia. Three beetle-produced compounds, conophthorin, tram-pinocarveol. and myrtenol did not enhance catches of males or females in ( z)-trans-pityol- baited traps. Racemic E-(k)- conophthorin. E-( -)- conophthorin, and E-( +)- conophthorin sig- nificantly reduced catches of males in traps baited with ( -c)-tran.s-pityol alone. Female C. coniperda were not attracted to any ofthe host- or beetle-produced compounds tested. The study demonstrated that traps \vith baits releasing (z)-t,ans-pityol at about lmgiwk with ( z)-a-pinene (98%pure) are potentially valuable tools for C conipwda pest management. Baited traps can be used to monitor C. cmipwdn populations or possibl>. to reduce seed losses in a beetle trap-out control strategy.
  • The Health of Colorado's Forests

    The Health of Colorado's Forests

    The Health of Colorado’s Forests Special Issue: Threats to Colorado’s Current and Future Forest Resources 2009 Report Acknowledgements William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Fort Collins, Colo., and Aerial Survey Coordinator, Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS), is the primary author of the 2009 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests. Thanks to the following Colorado State Forest Service employees who served on the Report Working Group and/or provided information, guidance and feedback. Chuck Dennis, Special Projects Forester, Broomfield, Colo. Joe Duda, Forest Management Division Supervisor, Fort Collins, Colo. Jan Hackett, Policy and Legislative Affairs Specialist, Denver, Colo. Meg Halford, Assistant District Forester, Franktown District, Franktown, Colo. Ben Pfohl, Assistant District Forester, Boulder District, Longmont, Colo. Tim Reader, Utilization and Marketing Forester, Durango District, Durango, Colo. Kelly Rogers, District Forester, Grand Junction District, Grand Junction, Colo. Dr. S. Sky Stephens, Entomologist, Fort Collins, Colo. Thanks to those who reviewed and/or provided information for this report: Dr. Donald Bright, C. P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Biodiversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo. Robert Cain, Entomologist, USDA Forest Service, Lakewood, Colo. Dr. Tony Cheng, Director, Colorado Forest Restoration Institute, Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo. Patricia M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Fort Collins, Colo. Brian Howell, Aerial Survey Program Manager, USDA Forest Service, Lakewood, Colo. Dr. Brian Kent, Research Forester, Human Uses, Economics, and Decision Sciences, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colo. Dave Leatherman, Entomologist, CSFS (retired), Fort Collins, Colo.
  • Omnipresent and Low-Overhead Application Debugging

    Omnipresent and Low-Overhead Application Debugging

    Omnipresent and low-overhead application debugging Robert Strandh [email protected] LaBRI, University of Bordeaux Talence, France ABSTRACT application programmers as opposed to system programmers. The state of the art in application debugging in free Common The difference, in the context of this paper, is that the tech- Lisp implementations leaves much to be desired. In many niques that we suggest are not adapted to debugging the cases, only a backtrace inspector is provided, allowing the system itself, such as the compiler. Instead, throughout this application programmer to examine the control stack when paper, we assume that, as far as the application programmer an unhandled error is signaled. Most such implementations do is concerned, the semantics of the code generated by the not allow the programmer to set breakpoints (unconditional compiler corresponds to that of the source code. or conditional), nor to step the program after it has stopped. In this paper, we are mainly concerned with Common Furthermore, even debugging tools such as tracing or man- Lisp [1] implementations distributed as so-called FLOSS, i.e., ually calling break are typically very limited in that they do \Free, Libre, and Open Source Software". While some such not allow the programmer to trace or break in important sys- implementations are excellent in terms of the quality of the tem functions such as make-instance or shared-initialize, code that the compiler generates, most leave much to be simply because these tools impact all callers, including those desired when it comes to debugging tools available to the of the system itself, such as the compiler.
  • A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella Species

    A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella Species

    A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella species (Basidiomycotina, Tricholomataceae) by Thomas J. Volk & Harold H. Burdsall, Jr. Synopsis Fungorum 8 Fungiflora - Oslo - Norway A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella species (Basidiomycotina, Tricholomataceae) by Thomas J. Volk & Harold H. Burdsall, Jr. Printed in Eko-trykk A/S, Førde, Norway Printing date: 1. August 1995 ISBN 82-90724-14-4 ISSN 0802-4966 A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella species (Basidiomycotina, Tricholomataceae) by Thomas J. Volk & Harold H. Burdsall, Jr. Synopsis Fungorum 8 Fungiflora - Oslo - Norway 6 Authors address: Center for Forest Mycology Research Forest Products Laboratory United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service One Gifford Pinchot Dr. Madison, WI 53705 USA ABSTRACT Once a taxonomic refugium for nearly any white-spored agaric with an annulus and attached gills, the concept of the genus Armillaria has been clarified with the neotypification of Armillaria mellea (Vahl:Fr.) Kummer and its acceptance as type species of Armillaria (Fr.:Fr.) Staude. Due to recognition of different type species over the years and an extremely variable generic concept, at least 274 species and varieties have been placed in Armillaria (or in Armillariella Karst., its obligate synonym). Only about forty species belong in the genus Armillaria sensu stricto, while the rest can be placed in forty-three other modem genera. This study is based on original descriptions in the literature, as well as studies of type specimens and generic and species concepts by other authors. This publication consists of an alphabetical listing of all epithets used in Armillaria or Armillariella, with their basionyms, currently accepted names, and other obligate and facultative synonyms.
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site

    Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site

    Powell, Schmidt, Halvorson In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Plant and Vertebrate Vascular U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Open-File Report 2005-1167 Southwest Biological Science Center Open-File Report 2005-1167 February 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site By Brian F. Powell, Cecilia A. Schmidt , and William L. Halvorson Open-File Report 2005-1167 December 2006 USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web:http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested Citation Powell, B. F, C. A. Schmidt, and W. L. Halvorson. 2006. Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site.
  • First Report of the Root-Rot Pathogen, Armillaria Nabsnona, from Hawaii

    First Report of the Root-Rot Pathogen, Armillaria Nabsnona, from Hawaii

    First Report of the Root-Rot Pathogen, Armillaria nabsnona, from Hawaii. J. W. Hanna, N. B. Klopfenstein, and M.-S. Kim, USDA Forest Service, RMRS, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 1221 South Main Street, Moscow, ID 83843. Plant Dis. 91:634, 2007; published online as doi:10.1094/PDIS-91-5-0634B. Accepted for publication 2 February 2007. The genus Armillaria (2) and Armillaria mellea sensu lato (3) have been The American Phytopathological reported previously from Hawaii. However, Armillaria species in Hawaii have Society (APS) is a non-profit, not been previously identified by DNA sequences, compatibility tests, or other professional, scientific organization dedicated to the methods that distinguish currently recognized taxa. In August 2005, Armillaria study and control of plant rhizomorphs and mycelial bark fans were collected from two locations on the diseases. island of Hawaii. Stands in which isolates were collected showed moderate to Copyright 1994-2007 heavy tree mortality and mycelial bark fans. Pairing tests (4) to determine The American Phytopathological vegetative compatibility groups revealed three Armillaria genets (HI-1, HI-7, Society and HI-9). Rhizomorphs of genet HI-1 were collected from both dead and healthy mature trees of the native ‘Ohia Lehua (Metrosideros polymorpha) approximately 27 km west of Hilo, HI (approximately 19°40'49"N, 155°19'24"W, elevation 1,450 m). Rhizomorphs of HI-7 and HI-9 were collected, respectively, from dead/declining, mature, introduced Nepalese alder (Alnus nepalensis) and from an apparently healthy, mature, introduced Chinese banyan (Ficus microcarpa) in the Waipi’o Valley (approximately 20°03'29"N, 155°37'35"W, elevation 925 m).
  • Verdura® Native Planting

    Verdura® Native Planting

    Abronia maritime Abronia maritima is a species of sand verbena known by the common name red (Coastal) sand verbena. This is a beach-adapted perennial plant native to the coastlines of southern California, including the Channel Islands, and northern Baja California. Abronia villosa Abronia villosa is a species of sand-verbena known by the common name desert (Inland) sand-verbena. It is native to the deserts of the southwestern United States and northern Mexico and the southern California and Baja coast. Adenostoma Adenostoma fasciculatum (chamise or greasewood) is a flowering plant native to fasciculatum California and northern Baja California. This shrub is one of the most widespread (Coastal/Inland) plants of the chaparral biome. Adenostoma fasciculatum is an evergreen shrub growing to 4m tall, with dry-looking stick-like branches. The leaves are small, 4– 10 mm long and 1mm broad with a pointed apex, and sprout in clusters from the branches. Arctostaphylos Arctostaphylos uva-ursi is a plant species of the genus Arctostaphylos (manzanita). uva-ursi Its common names include kinnikinnick and pinemat manzanita, and it is one of (Coastal/Inland) several related species referred to as bearberry. Arctostaphylos Arctostaphylos edmundsii, with the common name Little Sur manzanita, is a edmundsii species of manzanita. This shrub is endemic to California where it grows on the (Coastal/Inland) coastal bluffs of Monterey County. Arctostaphylos Arctostaphylos hookeri is a species of manzanita known by the common name hookeri Hooker's manzanita. Arctostaphylos hookeri is a low shrub which is variable in (Coastal/Inland) appearance and has several subspecies. The Arctostaphylos hookeri shrub is endemic to California where its native range extends from the coastal San Francisco Bay Area to the Central Coast.
  • Lepidoptera: Tortricidae, Olethreutinae) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol

    Lepidoptera: Tortricidae, Olethreutinae) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol

    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Zhang, A. H.; Li, H. H. A systematic study on Gibberifera Obraztsov, 1946 from China1 (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae, Olethreutinae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 32, núm. 128, diciembre, 2004, pp. 289-295 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45512808 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 289 Zhang 3/1/77 18:25 Página 289 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 32 (128), 2004: 289-295 SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 A systematic study on Gibberifera Obraztsov, 1946 from China1 (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae, Olethreutinae) A. H. Zhang & H. H. Li Abstract This paper deals with eight species of the genus Gibberifera Obraztsov from China. One new species, G. cla- vata Zhang & Li, sp. n., is described. The female of G. monticola Kuznetsov is described for the first time in scien- ce. A key to the Chinese species is given. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, Olethreutinae, Gibberifera, new species, China Un estudio sistemático sobre Gibberifera Obraztsov, 1946 de China (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae, Olethreutinae) Resumen Este trabajo trata ocho especies del género Gibberifera Obraztsov de China. Se describe una nueva especie G. clavata Zhang & Li, sp. n. Se describe por primera vez para la ciencia la hembra de G. monticola Kuznetsov. Se da una clave de las especies chinas.
  • A New Beetle-Fungus Disease Complex Threatening Avocado

    A New Beetle-Fungus Disease Complex Threatening Avocado

    identical new beetle species was found in Israel in 2009 in commer- Akif Eskalen cial avocado orchards where it has Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology been causing damage to avocado (Fig. 1,2). Unlike the Redbay Ambro- Richard Stouthamer sia beetle, the vector of the Laurel Department of Entomology wilt disease which has been infest- ing avocado and other members University of California of the avocado family (Laureceae) Riverside, California in the Southeastern United States, Figure. 2: A failed main branch of avo- the new beetle has been observed cado in Israel caused by the Fusarium die- on more than 100 di!erent plant back (Mendel et al. 2012) A new beetle-fungus disease species in California including many species common in the urban land- scape and on such agriculturally important species as: avocado, olive, complex threatening avocado peach, guava, lychee, mango, persimmon, and pomegranate. "e beetle and fungus have a symbiotic relationship. When the beetle burrows into the tree, it inoculates the host plant with the fungus, which is carried in its mouthparts in a structure called a mycangia. "e fungus attacks the vascular tissue of the tree which brings water and ecently a new beetle/disease complex was detected that nutrients from the roots to the rest of the tree eventually causing branch causes a Fusarium dieback on avocado and other host plants R dieback. "e beetle larvae live in galleries within the tree and feed on the in and near Los Angeles County. "e disease is caused by a new, yet un- fungus. named Fusarium sp.
  • Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern

    Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern

    Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants (Twenty-second Edition) CNPS, Rare Plant Program David L. Magney Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants1 By David L. Magney California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program, Locally Rare Project Updated 4 January 2017 Ventura County is located in southern California, USA, along the east edge of the Pacific Ocean. The coastal portion occurs along the south and southwestern quarter of the County. Ventura County is bounded by Santa Barbara County on the west, Kern County on the north, Los Angeles County on the east, and the Pacific Ocean generally on the south (Figure 1, General Location Map of Ventura County). Ventura County extends north to 34.9014ºN latitude at the northwest corner of the County. The County extends westward at Rincon Creek to 119.47991ºW longitude, and eastward to 118.63233ºW longitude at the west end of the San Fernando Valley just north of Chatsworth Reservoir. The mainland portion of the County reaches southward to 34.04567ºN latitude between Solromar and Sequit Point west of Malibu. When including Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands, the southernmost extent of the County occurs at 33.21ºN latitude and the westernmost extent at 119.58ºW longitude, on the south side and west sides of San Nicolas Island, respectively. Ventura County occupies 480,996 hectares [ha] (1,188,562 acres [ac]) or 4,810 square kilometers [sq. km] (1,857 sq. miles [mi]), which includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. The mainland portion of the county is 474,852 ha (1,173,380 ac), or 4,748 sq.
  • Bibliography

    Bibliography

    Bibliography Abella, S. R. 2010. Disturbance and plant succession in the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts of the American Southwest. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7:1248—1284. Abella, S. R., D. J. Craig, L. P. Chiquoine, K. A. Prengaman, S. M. Schmid, and T. M. Embrey. 2011. Relationships of native desert plants with red brome (Bromus rubens): Toward identifying invasion-reducing species. Invasive Plant Science and Management 4:115—124. Abella, S. R., N. A. Fisichelli, S. M. Schmid, T. M. Embrey, D. L. Hughson, and J. Cipra. 2015. Status and management of non-native plant invasion in three of the largest national parks in the United States. Nature Conservation 10:71—94. Available: https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.10.4407 Abella, S. R., A. A. Suazo, C. M. Norman, and A. C. Newton. 2013. Treatment alternatives and timing affect seeds of African mustard (Brassica tournefortii), an invasive forb in American Southwest arid lands. Invasive Plant Science and Management 6:559—567. Available: https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00022.1 Abrahamson, I. 2014. Arctostaphylos manzanita. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Fire Effects Information System (Online). plants/shrub/arcman/all.html Ackerman, T. L. 1979. Germination and survival of perennial plant species in the Mojave Desert. The Southwestern Naturalist 24:399—408. Adams, A. W. 1975. A brief history of juniper and shrub populations in southern Oregon. Report No. 6. Oregon State Wildlife Commission, Corvallis, OR. Adams, L. 1962. Planting depths for seeds of three species of Ceanothus.