DOCSLIB.ORG

The Decision to Drop the Bomb by Ushistory.Org

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Decision to Drop the Bomb by Ushistory.Org Name: Class: The Decision to Drop the Bomb By USHistory.org On August 6 and 9, 1945, the United States used nuclear weapons against two Japanese cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While the bombings effectively ended World War II, the costs were great and people continue to debate whether or not the bombings were necessary. As you read, take notes on the long-lasting effects of the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. [1] America had the bomb. Now what? When Harry Truman learned of the success of the Manhattan Project,1 he knew he was faced with a decision of unprecedented2 gravity. The capacity to end the war with Japan was in his hands, but it would involve unleashing the most terrible weapon ever known. American soldiers and civilians were weary from four years of war, yet the Japanese military was refusing to give up their fight. American forces occupied Okinawa and Iwo Jima and were intensely fire bombing Japanese cities. But Japan had an army of 2 million strong stationed in the "Boeing B-29A-45-BN Superfortress 44-61784 6 BG 24 BS - home islands guarding against invasion. Incendiary Journey" by United States Army Air Force is in the public domain. For Truman, the choice whether or not to use the atomic bomb was the most difficult decision of his life. [5] First, an Allied demand for an immediate unconditional surrender3 was made to the leadership in Japan. Although the demand stated that refusal would result in total destruction, no mention of any new weapons of mass destruction was made. The Japanese military command rejected the request for unconditional surrender, but there were indications that a conditional surrender was possible. Regardless, on August 6, 1945, a plane called the Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. Instantly, 70,000 Japanese citizens were vaporized.4 In the months and years that followed, an additional 100,000 perished from burns and radiation sickness. Two days later, the Soviet Union declared war on Japan. On August 9, a second atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, where 80,000 Japanese people perished.5 1. the code name for the United States’ efforts to develop atomic bombs during World War II 2. Unprecedented (adjective): never done or known before 3. a surrender in which no guarantees are given to the surrendering party 4. exposed to the poisonous chemicals released by the bomb 5. Perish (verb): to die 1 On August 14, 1945, the Japanese surrendered. Critics have charged that Truman’s decision was a barbaric6 act that brought negative long-term consequences to the United States. A new age of nuclear terror led to a dangerous arms race. Some military analysts insist that Japan was on its knees and the bombings were simply unnecessary. The American government was accused of racism on the grounds that such a device would never have been used against white civilians. [10] Other critics argued that American diplomats had ulterior7 motives. The Soviet Union had entered the war against Japan, and the atomic bomb could be read as a strong message for the Soviets to tread lightly. In this respect, Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have been the first shots of the Cold War as well as the final shots of World War II. Regardless, the United States remains the only nation in the world to have used a nuclear weapon on another nation. Truman stated that his decision to drop the bomb was purely military. A Normandy-type amphibious8 landing would have cost an estimated million casualties. Truman believed that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well. Prolonging the war was not an option for the President. Over 3,500 Japanese kamikaze raids9 had already wrought great destruction and loss of American lives. The President rejected a demonstration of the atomic bomb to the Japanese leadership. He knew there was no guarantee the Japanese would surrender if the test succeeded, and he felt that a failed demonstration would be worse than none at all. Even the scientific community failed to foresee the awful effects of radiation sickness. Truman saw little difference between atomic bombing Hiroshima and fire bombing Dresden or Tokyo. The ethical debate over the decision to drop the atomic bomb will never be resolved. The bombs did, however, bring an end to the most destructive war in history. The Manhattan Project that produced it demonstrated the possibility of how a nation’s resources could be mobilized. Pandora’s box10 was now open. The question that came flying out was, “How will the world use its nuclear capability?” It is a question still being addressed on a daily basis. “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” by USHistory.org is in the public domain. 6. cruel and inhumane 7. Ulterior (adjective): intentionally hidden 8. a military operation involving forces attacking from the sea 9. air raid attacks in which planes loaded with explosives crash into targets 10. refers to source of many problems, released upon the world 2 Text-Dependent Questions Directions: For the following questions, choose the best answer or respond in complete sentences. 1. PART A: Which word is a synonym for “ethical” as it is used in paragraph 13 of “The Decision to Drop the Bomb”? A. historic B. moral C. political D. scientific 2. PART B: Which phrase from an earlier paragraph helps the reader understand the meaning of the word “ethical”? A. “capacity to end the war, but it would involve unleashing the most terrible weapon ever known.” (Paragraph 2) B. “weary from four years of war… military was refusing to give up their fight.” (Paragraph 3) C. “no mention of any new weapons of mass destruction was made.” (Paragraph 5) D. “only nation in the world to have used a nuclear weapon on another nation.” (Paragraph 10) 3. PART A: One of the direct results of the decision to drop the atomic bomb was the fact that Japan surrendered, and the war ended. What was an indirect result of the decision to drop the bomb? A. President Truman learned of the success of the Manhattan Project. B. The Japanese were not told of the power of the atomic bomb. C. Tension between the United States and the Soviet Union increased. D. Japanese kamikaze raids caused the loss of many American lives. 4. PART B: Which sentence from the passage supports the answer to Part A? A. “The capacity to end the war with Japan was in his hands, but it would involve unleashing the most terrible weapon ever known.” (Paragraph 2) B. “The Japanese military command rejected the request for unconditional surrender, but there were indications that a conditional surrender was possible.” (Paragraph 5) C. “Critics have charged that Truman’s decision was a barbaric act that brought negative long-term consequences to the United States.” (Paragraph 8) D. “The Soviet Union had entered the war against Japan, and the atomic bomb could be read as a strong message for the Soviets to tread lightly.” (Paragraph 10) 3 Discussion Questions Directions: Brainstorm your answers to the following questions in the space provided. Be prepared to share your original ideas in a class discussion. 1. In the context of the text, how did Harry Truman defend his decision to use nuclear weapons against Japan? Do you think the abrupt end to the war was worth the mass casualties and long-term effects that resulted because of the bombs? Why or why not? 2. After reading about the devastating effects of nuclear weapons, do you think they should ever be used in war again? Why or why not? What are other technologies that cause more harm than good to humanity? 3. How do you think the lives of those who survived the bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were changed forever? How do you think the relationship between Japan and the United States was affected by the bombings? 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Making of an Atomic Bomb
    (Image: Courtesy of United States Government, public domain.) INTRODUCTORY ESSAY "DESTROYER OF WORLDS": THE MAKING OF AN ATOMIC BOMB At 5:29 a.m. (MST), the world’s first atomic bomb detonated in the New Mexican desert, releasing a level of destructive power unknown in the existence of humanity. Emitting as much energy as 21,000 tons of TNT and creating a fireball that measured roughly 2,000 feet in diameter, the first successful test of an atomic bomb, known as the Trinity Test, forever changed the history of the world. The road to Trinity may have begun before the start of World War II, but the war brought the creation of atomic weaponry to fruition. The harnessing of atomic energy may have come as a result of World War II, but it also helped bring the conflict to an end. How did humanity come to construct and wield such a devastating weapon? 1 | THE MANHATTAN PROJECT Models of Fat Man and Little Boy on display at the Bradbury Science Museum. (Image: Courtesy of Los Alamos National Laboratory.) WE WAITED UNTIL THE BLAST HAD PASSED, WALKED OUT OF THE SHELTER AND THEN IT WAS ENTIRELY SOLEMN. WE KNEW THE WORLD WOULD NOT BE THE SAME. A FEW PEOPLE LAUGHED, A FEW PEOPLE CRIED. MOST PEOPLE WERE SILENT. J. ROBERT OPPENHEIMER EARLY NUCLEAR RESEARCH GERMAN DISCOVERY OF FISSION Achieving the monumental goal of splitting the nucleus The 1930s saw further development in the field. Hungarian- of an atom, known as nuclear fission, came through the German physicist Leo Szilard conceived the possibility of self- development of scientific discoveries that stretched over several sustaining nuclear fission reactions, or a nuclear chain reaction, centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Project and Its Legacy
    Transforming the Relationship between Science and Society: The Manhattan Project and Its Legacy Report on the workshop funded by the National Science Foundation held on February 14 and 15, 2013 in Washington, DC Table of Contents Executive Summary iii Introduction 1 The Workshop 2 Two Motifs 4 Core Session Discussions 6 Scientific Responsibility 6 The Culture of Secrecy and the National Security State 9 The Decision to Drop the Bomb 13 Aftermath 15 Next Steps 18 Conclusion 21 Appendix: Participant List and Biographies 22 Copyright © 2013 by the Atomic Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this book, either text or illustration, may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, reporting, or by any information storage or retrieval system without written persmission from the publisher. Report prepared by Carla Borden. Design and layout by Alexandra Levy. Executive Summary The story of the Manhattan Project—the effort to develop and build the first atomic bomb—is epic, and it continues to unfold. The decision by the United States to use the bomb against Japan in August 1945 to end World War II is still being mythologized, argued, dissected, and researched. The moral responsibility of scientists, then and now, also has remained a live issue. Secrecy and security practices deemed necessary for the Manhattan Project have spread through the govern- ment, sometimes conflicting with notions of democracy. From the Manhattan Project, the scientific enterprise has grown enormously, to include research into the human genome, for example, and what became the Internet. Nuclear power plants provide needed electricity yet are controversial for many people.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Effort to Achieve World
    Marshall and the Atomic Bomb Marshall and the Atomic Bomb By Frank Settle General George C. Marshall and the Atomic Bomb (Praeger, 2016) provides the first full narrative describing General Marshall’s crucial role in the first decade of nuclear weapons that included the Manhattan Project, the use of the atomic bomb on Japan, and their management during the early years of the Cold War. Marshall is best known today as the architect of the plan for Europe’s recovery in the aftermath of World War II—the Marshall Plan. He also earned acclaim as the master strategist of the Allied victory in World War II. Marshall mobilized and equipped the Army and Air Force under a single command, serving as the primary conduit for information between the Army and the Air Force, as well as the president and secretary of war. As Army Chief of Staff during World War II, he developed a close working relationship with Admiral Earnest King, Chief of Naval Operations; worked with Congress and leaders of industry on funding and producing resources for the war; and developed and implemented the successful strategy the Allies pursued in fighting the war. Last but not least of his responsibilities was the production of the atomic bomb. The Beginnings An early morning phone call to General Marshall and a letter to President Franklin Roosevelt led to Marshall’s little known, nonetheless critical, role in the development and use of the atomic bomb. The call, received at 3:00 a.m. on September 1, 1939, informed Marshall that German dive bombers had attacked Warsaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 Points Total) PLEASE DO NO
    Mr. Huesken 10th Grade United States History II Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 points total) PLEASE DO NO WRITE ON THIS TEST DIRECTIONS – Please answer the following multiple-choice questions with the best possible answer. No answer will be used more than once. (45 questions @ 1 point each = 45 points) 1) All of the following were leaders of totalitarian governments in the 1930’s and 1940’s except: a. Joseph Stalin b. Francisco Franco. c. Benito Mussolini d. Neville Chamberlain. 2) In what country was the Fascist party and government formed? a. Italy b. Japan c. Spain d. Germany 3) The Battle of Britain forced Germany to do what to their war plans in Europe in 1942? a. Join the Axis powers. b. Fight a three-front war. c. Put off the invasion of Britain. d. Enter into a nonaggression pact with Britain. 4) The Nazis practiced genocide toward Jews, Gypsies, and other “undesirable” peoples in Europe. What does the term “genocide” mean? a. Acting out of anti-Semitic beliefs. b. Deliberate extermination of a specific group of people. c. Terrorizing of the citizens of a nation by a government. d. Killing of people for the express purpose of creating terror. 5) The term “blitzkrieg” was a military strategy that depended on what? a. A system of fortifications. b. Out-waiting the opponent. c. Surprise and quick, overwhelming force. d. The ability to make a long, steady advance. 6) In an effort to avoid a second “world war”, when did the Britain and France adopt a policy of appeasement toward Germany? a.
    [Show full text]
  • A Secret Revealed
    LESSON PLAN (Image: US Army/Air Force, public domain.) A SECRET REVEALED GRADE LEVEL: 7-12 TIME REQUIREMENT: 1-2 CLASS PERIODS INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES After the United States dropped Little Boy on Hiroshima, Japan, In reading different letters about the atomic bomb sent the morning of August 6, 1945, the world learned of the great to and from a worker in the Manhattan Project, students secret behind the Manhattan Project. Even with thousands of should be able to determine how people from various people involved in the construction of atomic bombs, the secrecy backgrounds reacted to the news of its existence and around the manufacture of nuclear weapons remained tightly held. its use in combat. Students should also assess how the Outside of limited cases of espionage, news of the atomic bomb differing perspectives affected the way certain individuals went unnoticed among the general public until after the bombing reacted to the dropping of such bombs on Japanese of Hiroshima, and the dropping of Fat Man three days later on cities. By contrasting the views preserved in these Nagasaki. As knowledge of atomic weapons reached the general primary sources, students will be able to see how limited public, reactions varied widely. In this lesson, students will examine the knowledge of nuclear weapons was in 1945, how primary source materials from The National WWII Museum’s debates on use of the bomb emerged in the aftermath collection in which differing responses to the atomic bomb of the war, and how even those who participated in the appear. Looking at the letters of civilians living near Alamogordo, Manhattan Project had concerns about the existence of New Mexico, of a participant in the Manhattan Project, and of such weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II Europe, Africa and Asia (The Pacific) World War II: an Overview
    World War II Europe, Africa and Asia (the Pacific) World War II: an overview War Fought in Europe but also Asia and Africa ‘Allied Powers:’ Britain, France, Poland ‐ supported by African, Indian, Commonwealth (Canadian, Australian, New Zealand, South African) troops ‐ Soviet Union joined 1941 (after initial co‐ operation with Germany) ‐ China also joined 1941 By 1942, ‘direction’ of Allies in hands US, Britain and Soviet Union World War II: an overview War Fought in Europe but also Asia and Africa ‘Axis Powers:’ Germany, Italy, Japan (grew from mid‐1930s Com‐Intern Pact) ‐ included support of several ‘puppet’ states in eastern Europe, Asia ‐ e.g. Japanese Manchukuo, Burma, Philippines, Indochina (Vietnam) ‐ French North/West Africa following fall of France (e.g. Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria ) ‐ Italy’s North African colony, Libya World War II: an overview Overview: German Aggression ‐ 1939: officially ‘War in Europe’ began in when Germany invaded Poland, Britain and France responded by declaring war on Germany ‐1940: Germany attacked, occupied Denmark, Norway, ‐ followed by Belgium, the Netherlands, and finallyFrance ‐ only now did British ground forces engage The Momentum of War April-May 1940 World War II: Fall of France Occupation of France 1940: ‐ French forces backed by British allies fell to Germans in seven weeks (spring) ‐ British forces scrambling to escape: many losses ‐ country divided between Military Occupation (north) and ‘Vichy government’ (south) –1942‐44 whole country occupied ‐ French colonies North/West Africa became by
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Logistics and Logistical Strategies: How the Allies
    Strategic Logistics and Logistical Strategies: How the Allies Triumphed in Europe Military Historical Society of Massachusetts ROTC Essay Contest 2020 Cadet Kyle Hammalian Detachment 355, Air Force ROTC Boston University 1 April 2020 Contents Introduction 1 The Importance of Logistics in War 4 How American Logistics Changed After the Attack on Pearl Harbor 6 Invading North Africa: Lessons from Planning Operation TORCH 10 The Invasion of Italy: Amphibious Assault, Again 14 The Buildup to France: Operation BOLERO 17 The Invasion of France: Operation OVERLORD 20 Conclusion 26 Notes 30 Bibliography 35 Hammalian 1 Introduction Victory in Europe (V-E) Day celebrates the victorious Allies of World War II and the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany, which occurred on 8 May 1945. This year marks the 75th anniversary of V-E Day. Victory in Europe was the outcome of many years of sustained human conflict, supported by an unprecedented mobilization of military forces and the movement of massive amounts of materiel. Strategic decisions drove theater logistical requirements. Strategy includes both grand strategy and operational strategy. From a grand strategic perspective, war aims were set by political leaders such as President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill. Operation strategy, which includes planning military campaigns, was determined by military leaders like General George Marshall, General Dwight D. Eisenhower, and theater staff. Successful execution of operations at the tactical level can be attributed to the valor and dedication of Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, Airmen, and Coast Guardsman in battle. Logistical parameters constrained strategy. Leadership could set any strategy, and faithful service members could dedicate themselves to that objective, but no strategy can succeed without accounting for logistical considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • 70 Years of and Counting
    Federation of American Scientists 70 years of and counting Alexander DeVolpi Retired, Argonne National Laboratory Freeman Dyson Retired, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton University Charles D. Ferguson President, FAS Richard L. Garwin IBM Fellow Emeritus, IBM Thomas J. Watson CHARLES D. FERGUSON Research Center Editor in Chief Frank von Hippel ALLISON FELDMAN Co-Director, Program on Science and Global Managing and Creative Editor Security, Princeton University ___________ Robert S. Norris Senior Fellow for Nuclear Policy, FAS B. Cameron Reed Charles A. Dana Professor of Physics, Alma FAS Public Interest Report College 1725 DeSales Street NW Megan Sethi Suite 600 U.S. Historian and Adjunct Professor, Cal Poly Washington, DC 20036 Pomona and Southern New Hampshire PHONE: 202.546.3300 University FAX: 202.675.1010 Daniel Singer EMAIL: [email protected] Of Counsel, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & The PIR welcomes letters to the editor. Letters Jacobson LLP should not exceed 300 words and may be edited Jeremy J. Stone for length and clarity. Founder, Catalytic Diplomacy ___________ Annual print subscription is $100.00. An archive of FAS Public Interest Reports is available online at: http://fas.org/publications/public-interest- reports/. Cover image: U.S. military observe the explosion during Operation Crossroads Baker, a nuclear test conducted on Bikini Atoll on July 25, 1946. Source: U.S. Department of Defense. PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE: REINVENTION AND RENEWAL Charles D. Ferguson………………………………………………………………………………..1 THE LEGACY OF THE FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS Megan Sethi………………………………………………………………………………………...5 SCIENTISTS AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS, 1945-2015 Robert S. Norris…………………………………………………………………..…………….....12 GOVERNMENT SECRECY AND CENSORSHIP Alexander DeVolpi……………………………………………………………………………......15 FAS HISTORY, 1961-1963 Freeman Dyson…………………………………………………………………………...………23 FAS IN THE 1960s: FORMATIVE YEARS Daniel Singer………………………………………………………………………………...……26 REVITALIZING AND LEADING FAS: 1970-2000 Jeremy J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb” Is a Short History of the Origins and Develop- Ment of the American Atomic Bomb Program During World War H
    f.IOE/MA-0001 -08 ‘9g [ . J vb JMkirlJkhilgUimBA’mmml — .— Q RDlmm UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ,:.. .- ..-. .. -,.,,:. ,.<,.;<. ~-.~,.,.- -<.:,.:-,------—,.--,,p:---—;-.:-- ---:---—---- -..>------------.,._,.... ,/ ._ . ... ,. “ .. .;l, ..,:, ..... ..’, .’< . Copies of this publication are available while supply lasts from the OffIce of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. BOX 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Attention: Information Services Telephone: (423) 576-8401 Also Available: The United States Department of Energy: A Summary History, 1977-1994 @ Printed with soy ink on recycled paper DO13MA-0001 a +~?y I I Tho PROJEOT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY F.G. Gosling History Division Executive Secretariat Management and Administration Department of Energy ]January 1999 edition . DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. I DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. 1 Foreword The Department of Energy Organization Act of 1977 brought together for the first time in one department most of the Federal Government’s energy programs.
    [Show full text]
  • World War Ii – European Theater Test Matching ______1
    NAME ___________________________________________________________BLOCK _________________ WORLD WAR II – EUROPEAN THEATER TEST MATCHING ______ 1. Location of Pearl Harbor a. Ardennes Forest ______ 2. Policy of giving aggressors what they want in order to avoid conflict b. Josef Stalin ______ 3. Leader of Fascist Italy c. Blitzkrieg ______ 4. Leader of the USSR d. Holocaust ______ 5. Symbol of women’s’ effort during WWII e. Okinawa ______ 6. Invasion of Normandy f. Dachau ______ 7. “lighting war” g. Berlin ______ 8. Successor of FDR h. USS Missouri ______ 9. Attack on Pearl Harbor i. Benito Mussolini ______ 10. The deliberate and systematic extermination of a group of people j. Appeasement ______ 11. Deliberate extermination of European Jews, “sacrifice by fire” k. Oahu Island, Hawaii ______ 12. Location of Hitler’s bunker l. VE Day ______ 13. First Concentration Camp m. June 6, 1944 th ______ 14. Location of the Battle of the Bulge n. Dec. 7 , 1941 ______ 15. May 8, 1945 o. Harry S. Truman ______ 16. Japanese suicide pilots p. Genocide ______ 17. Development of the atomic bomb q. Kamikaze ______ 18. Created by the “Big Three” at the Yalta Conference r. Manhattan Project ______ 19. Location of the formal Japanese surrender s. Rosie the Riveter ______ 20. Potential “jump off” point for the invasion of Japan t. United Nations MULTIPLE CHOICE ______ 1. The first turning point of the war in Europe was the Nazi invasion of _____________________________. a. Great Britain b. USSR c. France d. Germany ______ 2. Operation Market Garden was the codename for the liberation of ______________________________.
    [Show full text]
  • 16.4 the Allied Victory
    16.4 The Allied Victory Main Idea: Essential Question: What were the key battles that Led by the U.S., lead to the end of WWII in Europe? In the Pacific? Great Britain, and the Soviet Union, the Allies scored key victories and won the war. Why it Matters Now: The Allies’ victory in WWII set up conditions for both the Cold War and today’s post-Cold War world. Battle of the Atlantic After Pearl Harbor, Hitler ordered submarine raids along America’s East Coast 1942: Germans sank over 680 Allied ships The Allies respond by organizing cargo ships into convoys for mutual protection Equipped with sonar for detecting subs Allies were able to find & destroy German U-boats faster than the Germans could build them U.S. launched shipbuilding program. Early 1943: 140 ships were being produced each month Mid 1943: Battle of the Atlantic had turned in the Allies favor The Allies Plan for Victory After Pearl Harbor, Churchill and Roosevelt met at the White House to develop a joint war policy Stalin wanted them to open a second front to relieve pressure on his troops in the east. The US and Britain agreed to strike first in Northern Africa and the Mediterranean instead of France, where Stalin wanted. North African Front: Operation Torch November 1942: landed in Casablanca, Oran, & Algers in North Africa 107,000 Allied troops – most of them American Commanded by the U.S. general Dwight D. Eisenhower Chased the Rommel’s Afrika Korps east May 1943: Afrika Korps surrendered Message from British General Harold Alexander to Churchill: “All enemy resistance has ceased.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachable Moments: World War II
    TEACHABLE MOMENTS WORLD WAR II COMBINING DOCUMENTS AND DOCUMENTARIES FOR USE IN THE CLASSROOM Teachable Moments in Your Classroom The Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum’s Education Department is proud to present this fourteen part curriculum guide titled, Teachable Moments: World War II. This guide has been developed for teachers as a multi-purpose teaching tool. It contains material appropriate for students in all grade levels from 4th- 12th grade, and beyond. The guide is centered on fourteen short film segments which are the core of the “teachable moments.” These were created by the Pare Lorentz Center from archival film footage and still photographs culled from the holdings of the Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum; part of the National Archives and Records Administration. With more than 17 million pages of documents, it is the world’s premier research center for the study of the Roosevelt era. The segments are suitable for classroom viewing and are designed to provide a short, concise presentation of an historic topic or event. Each is supported with a transcript of the segment’s script and is accompanied by a set of short answer questions. Copies of historic primary source documents, each with its own set of in-depth questions, are provided to give students experience gathering and interpreting information from a variety of primary sources. When viewed in sequence the teachable moments’ segments tell the story of the world’s most deadly and destructive conflict. When viewed selectively, they can be used as points of departure to highlight the current connections between the issues and concerns we face in our own times and those that were faced in the times of Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt.
    [Show full text]