DOCSLIB.ORG

World War II Europe, Africa and Asia (The Pacific) World War II: an Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World War II Europe, Africa and Asia (The Pacific) World War II: an Overview World War II Europe, Africa and Asia (the Pacific) World War II: an overview War Fought in Europe but also Asia and Africa ‘Allied Powers:’ Britain, France, Poland ‐ supported by African, Indian, Commonwealth (Canadian, Australian, New Zealand, South African) troops ‐ Soviet Union joined 1941 (after initial co‐ operation with Germany) ‐ China also joined 1941 By 1942, ‘direction’ of Allies in hands US, Britain and Soviet Union World War II: an overview War Fought in Europe but also Asia and Africa ‘Axis Powers:’ Germany, Italy, Japan (grew from mid‐1930s Com‐Intern Pact) ‐ included support of several ‘puppet’ states in eastern Europe, Asia ‐ e.g. Japanese Manchukuo, Burma, Philippines, Indochina (Vietnam) ‐ French North/West Africa following fall of France (e.g. Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria ) ‐ Italy’s North African colony, Libya World War II: an overview Overview: German Aggression ‐ 1939: officially ‘War in Europe’ began in when Germany invaded Poland, Britain and France responded by declaring war on Germany ‐1940: Germany attacked, occupied Denmark, Norway, ‐ followed by Belgium, the Netherlands, and finallyFrance ‐ only now did British ground forces engage The Momentum of War April-May 1940 World War II: Fall of France Occupation of France 1940: ‐ French forces backed by British allies fell to Germans in seven weeks (spring) ‐ British forces scrambling to escape: many losses ‐ country divided between Military Occupation (north) and ‘Vichy government’ (south) –1942‐44 whole country occupied ‐ French colonies North/West Africa became by extension ‘Vichy’: supported Germany [see ‘War in North Africa’, below] World War II: Fall of France World War II: Battle of Britain The Battle of Britain: July‐October 1940 ‐ Germany launched air attack on Britain ‐ battle between RAF and Luftwaffe first major military battle fought in the air ‐ crucial for Hitler’s plan to control English Channel (military traffic) and invade Britain ‐ targeted shipping, airfields: British RAF had many advantages (home ground, radar) ‐ terrorized civilians: towns indiscriminately bombed World War II: Battle of Britain ‐ by mid‐September, Luftwaffe clearly ‘out‐ gunned’: lost 1700 planes (to RAF’s 900) ‐ Hitler no longer looking to invade but focused bombing on large cities, centres industry, ship building: e.g. Coventry, Plymouth ‐ much of London destroyed during Battle of Britain Battle of Britain: Programme of shipping children out of cities like London into countryside ‘to safety’ Images of Devastation: London during the Battle of Britain “Never, in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.” Sir Winston Churchill (speaking of British RAF during the Battle of Britain) World War II: North Africa The War in Greece and North Africa ‐ Italy took advantage of fall of France: entered war with Axis powers ‐ late autumn/winter 1940‐41: invaded Greece ‐ disaster: Britain became involved and new ‘front’ opened up against Germany in Greece World War II: North Africa The War in North Africa ‐ part of German invasion of Britain had included Italian attack from Libya into Egypt ‐ when British invasion was sidetracked in September 1940, Mussolini ordered forces to attack anyway ‐ although Italians were numerically superior, British highly mobile ‐ campaign a disaster: by December Italian forces in North Africa on verge of collapse World War II: North Africa Germans in North Africa: ‐ February 1941, German General Field Marshal Rommel arrived to provide more firepower and new leadership ‐ became known as the “Desert Fox” World War II: North Africa ‐ new, more suitable Italian troops and equipment lent support Italian Tank on Tunisian Frontier World War II: North Africa Rommel’s ‘Afrika Korps’: took firm root in North Africa –invited Allied engagement ‐ Tobruk (Libya): following Italian defeat 1940, British forces took Tobruk 1941 ‐ saw several major battles over next two years ‐ finally remained in Allied hands after 1942 World War II: North Africa British Engaged in ‘Cat-and-Mouse’ Chase with Rommel World War II: North Africa El‐Alamein and ‘Operation Torch’: 1942 ‐ Battle of El‐Alamein (Oct. 23 ‐ Nov. 3): considered most decisive battle in North African Campaign ‐ British force twice as strong, Rommel not present at beginning of attack: overwhelming Allied victory ‐ turning point for hugely successful ‘Afrika Korps’ specializing in surprise attacks and outflanking maneuvers Word War II: North Africa El‐Alamein and ‘Operation Torch’ ‐ “Operation Torch” (Nov. 8): British and US sea invasion French North Africa (Morocco) ‐ 100,000 men, over 600 ships: among the largest amphibian invasions in history ‐ faced more resistance than expected from Vichy French colonies ‐ drew German forces needed in Europe into Tunisia: defeated ‐ May 1943: Allied forces controlled 1000 miles North African Coast World War II: North Africa Operation Torch November 1942: successful Morocco, Algeria. ‘Agreement’ left Vichy administration in place but colonists ordered to support Allies. Germany sent troops to prop up Tunisia. Fierce fighting continued until May 1943 when German troops finally surrendered. World War II: North Africa Importance of War in North Africa: ‐ showed weakness of Italian colonial adventure (adding British and French colonies to Libya) ‐ failure forced Germany to ‘come to the rescue’: turned into large‐scale, long‐term conflict ‐ weakened much‐needed German efforts elsewhere in Europe: defeat costly ‐ first involvement of US in European theatre World War II: Eastern Front The War on the Eastern Front: ‐ during same period, Germany also turned eastward: “Operation Barbarossa” ‐ June 1941 began long‐planned invasion Soviet Union (three‐pronged attack ): 4 million soldiers ‐ anticipated easy victories: initially achieved goals ‐‐swift progress, deep into Soviet heartland World War II: Eastern Front World War II: Eastern Front Plan to complete conquest by onset of winter: failed ‐ country too large to control all forces ‐ winter: brutal – men, equipment bogged down; temperatures unbearable ‐ Russians determined to fight, no matter what the costs: both soldiers and local partisans World War II: Eastern Front Battle for Moscow: ‐ November: civilians dug 5000kms trenches around city ‐ kept German troops mired in place: vulnerable to partisan harassment ‐ in three weeks, lost 85,000 men: as many as had been lost in “Operation Barbarossa” to date ‐ Hitler stopped the offensive: stalemate over the winter The Battle for Moscow: German forces kept several kilometers from city World War II: Eastern Front Taking German soldiers as POWs Civilian-built barricades, Moscow World War II: Eastern Front Battle of Stalingrad: 1942‐43 ‐ next summer, operations shifted south ‐ Stalingrad: centre Russian communications, manufacturing; stood between Germany and oil fields of Caucuses ‐ critical to both Stalin and Hitler: neither would step back ‐ both armies told no retreat, surrender possible –no matter what! World War II: Eastern Front World War II: Eastern Front Battle of Stalingrad: 1942‐43 ‐ initial attack August: German air bombings set city on fire: 40,000 inhabitants died ‐ oil spill set Volga River on fire ‐ looked like quick victory: wrong ‐ became “one of deadliest single battles in history”: lasted six more months and over another winter in Russia World War II: Eastern Front Battle of Stalingrad: 1942‐43 ‐ one of most brutal of in War: hand‐to‐hand daily conflict; both sides used snipers ‐ city bombed‐out shell: fighting took place street‐by‐street, building‐by‐building ‐ “what Germans took by day, Russians took back by night” Street Fighting, Stalingrad Word War II: Eastern Front Russians Defending Positions, Stalingrad World War II: Eastern Front Battle of Stalingrad: 1942‐43 ‐ November: Soviets used 1million soldiers to surround city, trapped 300,000 Germans ‐ Hitler would not permit escape attempt: siege continued ‐ both armies suffered but Germans less able to cope with temperatures, lack of heat, shortages food: army dying of starvation ‐ Germans surrendered end of January 1943 Word War II: Eastern Front Soldiers in Winter, Stalingrad World War II: Eastern Front Battle of Stalingrad: 1942‐43 ‐ in addition to complete Army lost, 91,000 taken prisoner ‐ losses manpower, equipment left Germany unable to resist Russian forces when they returned the attack ‐ Germany in retreat through 1944 ‐ Hitler declared national day of mourning: not for the men lost but for the shame brought upon Germany by surrender! World War II: Eastern Front Of 91,000 prisoners, half died en route to concentration camps; only 5-6000 returned home alive . World War II: Western Front The War in the West: Normandy and “D‐Day” ‐ long‐awaited invasion of France: ‘Operation Overlord’ ‐ ‘misinformation campaign’ using turned German spies convinced Hitler attack would take place at Calais ‐ June 1944: British and US forces landed at Normandy, further south ‐ backed up by forces dropped inland by parachutes World War II: Western Front The War in the West: Normandy and “D‐Day” ‐ Hitler still convinced another attack was planned for Calais, so withheld reserve forces ‐ mistake: although Allies had high casualties first day, still outnumbered Germans ‐ secured coast: movement inland more difficult, took July, August World War II: Western Front World War II: Western Front The War in the West: Normandy and “D‐Day” ‐ American forces had taken Rome just before D‐Day: Italy now southern gateway to France ‐ August 15: 100,000 Allied soldiers invaded France from south ‐ armies approached Paris from north
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Making of an Atomic Bomb
    (Image: Courtesy of United States Government, public domain.) INTRODUCTORY ESSAY "DESTROYER OF WORLDS": THE MAKING OF AN ATOMIC BOMB At 5:29 a.m. (MST), the world’s first atomic bomb detonated in the New Mexican desert, releasing a level of destructive power unknown in the existence of humanity. Emitting as much energy as 21,000 tons of TNT and creating a fireball that measured roughly 2,000 feet in diameter, the first successful test of an atomic bomb, known as the Trinity Test, forever changed the history of the world. The road to Trinity may have begun before the start of World War II, but the war brought the creation of atomic weaponry to fruition. The harnessing of atomic energy may have come as a result of World War II, but it also helped bring the conflict to an end. How did humanity come to construct and wield such a devastating weapon? 1 | THE MANHATTAN PROJECT Models of Fat Man and Little Boy on display at the Bradbury Science Museum. (Image: Courtesy of Los Alamos National Laboratory.) WE WAITED UNTIL THE BLAST HAD PASSED, WALKED OUT OF THE SHELTER AND THEN IT WAS ENTIRELY SOLEMN. WE KNEW THE WORLD WOULD NOT BE THE SAME. A FEW PEOPLE LAUGHED, A FEW PEOPLE CRIED. MOST PEOPLE WERE SILENT. J. ROBERT OPPENHEIMER EARLY NUCLEAR RESEARCH GERMAN DISCOVERY OF FISSION Achieving the monumental goal of splitting the nucleus The 1930s saw further development in the field. Hungarian- of an atom, known as nuclear fission, came through the German physicist Leo Szilard conceived the possibility of self- development of scientific discoveries that stretched over several sustaining nuclear fission reactions, or a nuclear chain reaction, centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Project and Its Legacy
    Transforming the Relationship between Science and Society: The Manhattan Project and Its Legacy Report on the workshop funded by the National Science Foundation held on February 14 and 15, 2013 in Washington, DC Table of Contents Executive Summary iii Introduction 1 The Workshop 2 Two Motifs 4 Core Session Discussions 6 Scientific Responsibility 6 The Culture of Secrecy and the National Security State 9 The Decision to Drop the Bomb 13 Aftermath 15 Next Steps 18 Conclusion 21 Appendix: Participant List and Biographies 22 Copyright © 2013 by the Atomic Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this book, either text or illustration, may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, reporting, or by any information storage or retrieval system without written persmission from the publisher. Report prepared by Carla Borden. Design and layout by Alexandra Levy. Executive Summary The story of the Manhattan Project—the effort to develop and build the first atomic bomb—is epic, and it continues to unfold. The decision by the United States to use the bomb against Japan in August 1945 to end World War II is still being mythologized, argued, dissected, and researched. The moral responsibility of scientists, then and now, also has remained a live issue. Secrecy and security practices deemed necessary for the Manhattan Project have spread through the govern- ment, sometimes conflicting with notions of democracy. From the Manhattan Project, the scientific enterprise has grown enormously, to include research into the human genome, for example, and what became the Internet. Nuclear power plants provide needed electricity yet are controversial for many people.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Effort to Achieve World
    Marshall and the Atomic Bomb Marshall and the Atomic Bomb By Frank Settle General George C. Marshall and the Atomic Bomb (Praeger, 2016) provides the first full narrative describing General Marshall’s crucial role in the first decade of nuclear weapons that included the Manhattan Project, the use of the atomic bomb on Japan, and their management during the early years of the Cold War. Marshall is best known today as the architect of the plan for Europe’s recovery in the aftermath of World War II—the Marshall Plan. He also earned acclaim as the master strategist of the Allied victory in World War II. Marshall mobilized and equipped the Army and Air Force under a single command, serving as the primary conduit for information between the Army and the Air Force, as well as the president and secretary of war. As Army Chief of Staff during World War II, he developed a close working relationship with Admiral Earnest King, Chief of Naval Operations; worked with Congress and leaders of industry on funding and producing resources for the war; and developed and implemented the successful strategy the Allies pursued in fighting the war. Last but not least of his responsibilities was the production of the atomic bomb. The Beginnings An early morning phone call to General Marshall and a letter to President Franklin Roosevelt led to Marshall’s little known, nonetheless critical, role in the development and use of the atomic bomb. The call, received at 3:00 a.m. on September 1, 1939, informed Marshall that German dive bombers had attacked Warsaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Infantry Combat Training During the Second World War
    SHARPENING THE SABRE: CANADIAN INFANTRY COMBAT TRAINING DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR By R. DANIEL PELLERIN BBA (Honours), Wilfrid Laurier University, 2007 BA (Honours), Wilfrid Laurier University, 2008 MA, University of Waterloo, 2009 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in History University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontario, Canada © Raymond Daniel Ryan Pellerin, Ottawa, Canada, 2016 ii ABSTRACT “Sharpening the Sabre: Canadian Infantry Combat Training during the Second World War” Author: R. Daniel Pellerin Supervisor: Serge Marc Durflinger 2016 During the Second World War, training was the Canadian Army’s longest sustained activity. Aside from isolated engagements at Hong Kong and Dieppe, the Canadians did not fight in a protracted campaign until the invasion of Sicily in July 1943. The years that Canadian infantry units spent training in the United Kingdom were formative in the history of the Canadian Army. Despite what much of the historical literature has suggested, training succeeded in making the Canadian infantry capable of succeeding in battle against German forces. Canadian infantry training showed a definite progression towards professionalism and away from a pervasive prewar mentality that the infantry was a largely unskilled arm and that training infantrymen did not require special expertise. From 1939 to 1941, Canadian infantry training suffered from problems ranging from equipment shortages to poor senior leadership. In late 1941, the Canadians were introduced to a new method of training called “battle drill,” which broke tactical manoeuvres into simple movements, encouraged initiative among junior leaders, and greatly boosted the men’s morale.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 Points Total) PLEASE DO NO
    Mr. Huesken 10th Grade United States History II Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 points total) PLEASE DO NO WRITE ON THIS TEST DIRECTIONS – Please answer the following multiple-choice questions with the best possible answer. No answer will be used more than once. (45 questions @ 1 point each = 45 points) 1) All of the following were leaders of totalitarian governments in the 1930’s and 1940’s except: a. Joseph Stalin b. Francisco Franco. c. Benito Mussolini d. Neville Chamberlain. 2) In what country was the Fascist party and government formed? a. Italy b. Japan c. Spain d. Germany 3) The Battle of Britain forced Germany to do what to their war plans in Europe in 1942? a. Join the Axis powers. b. Fight a three-front war. c. Put off the invasion of Britain. d. Enter into a nonaggression pact with Britain. 4) The Nazis practiced genocide toward Jews, Gypsies, and other “undesirable” peoples in Europe. What does the term “genocide” mean? a. Acting out of anti-Semitic beliefs. b. Deliberate extermination of a specific group of people. c. Terrorizing of the citizens of a nation by a government. d. Killing of people for the express purpose of creating terror. 5) The term “blitzkrieg” was a military strategy that depended on what? a. A system of fortifications. b. Out-waiting the opponent. c. Surprise and quick, overwhelming force. d. The ability to make a long, steady advance. 6) In an effort to avoid a second “world war”, when did the Britain and France adopt a policy of appeasement toward Germany? a.
    [Show full text]
  • JGI V. 14, N. 2
    Journal of Global Initiatives: Policy, Pedagogy, Perspective Volume 14 Number 2 Multicultural Morocco Article 1 11-15-2019 Full Issue - JGI v. 14, n. 2 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/jgi Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation (2019) "Full Issue - JGI v. 14, n. 2," Journal of Global Initiatives: Policy, Pedagogy, Perspective: Vol. 14 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/jgi/vol14/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Global Initiatives: Policy, Pedagogy, Perspective by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Multicultural Morocco JOURNAL of GLOBAL INITIATIVES POLICY, PEDAGOGY, PERSPECTIVE 2019 VOLUME 14 NUMBER 2 Journal of global Initiatives Vol. 14, No. 2, 2019, pp.1-28. The Year of Morocco: An Introduction Dan Paracka Marking the 35th anniversary of Kennesaw State University’s award-winning Annual Country Study Program, the 2018-19 academic year focused on Morocco and consisted of 22 distinct educational events, with over 1,700 people in attendance. It also featured an interdisciplinary team-taught Year of Morocco (YoM) course that included a study abroad experience to Morocco (March 28-April 7, 2019), an academic conference on “Gender, Identity, and Youth Empowerment in Morocco” (March 15-16, 2019), and this dedicated special issue of the Journal of Global Initiatives. Most events were organized through six different College Spotlights titled: The Taste of Morocco; Experiencing Moroccan Visual Arts; Multiple Literacies in Morocco; Conflict Management, Peacebuilding, and Development Challenges in Morocco, Moroccan Cultural Festival; and Moroccan Solar Tree.
    [Show full text]
  • A Secret Revealed
    LESSON PLAN (Image: US Army/Air Force, public domain.) A SECRET REVEALED GRADE LEVEL: 7-12 TIME REQUIREMENT: 1-2 CLASS PERIODS INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES After the United States dropped Little Boy on Hiroshima, Japan, In reading different letters about the atomic bomb sent the morning of August 6, 1945, the world learned of the great to and from a worker in the Manhattan Project, students secret behind the Manhattan Project. Even with thousands of should be able to determine how people from various people involved in the construction of atomic bombs, the secrecy backgrounds reacted to the news of its existence and around the manufacture of nuclear weapons remained tightly held. its use in combat. Students should also assess how the Outside of limited cases of espionage, news of the atomic bomb differing perspectives affected the way certain individuals went unnoticed among the general public until after the bombing reacted to the dropping of such bombs on Japanese of Hiroshima, and the dropping of Fat Man three days later on cities. By contrasting the views preserved in these Nagasaki. As knowledge of atomic weapons reached the general primary sources, students will be able to see how limited public, reactions varied widely. In this lesson, students will examine the knowledge of nuclear weapons was in 1945, how primary source materials from The National WWII Museum’s debates on use of the bomb emerged in the aftermath collection in which differing responses to the atomic bomb of the war, and how even those who participated in the appear. Looking at the letters of civilians living near Alamogordo, Manhattan Project had concerns about the existence of New Mexico, of a participant in the Manhattan Project, and of such weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes, Practices and Effects of Wars Mike Wells Series Editor: Allan Todd
    History for the IB Diploma Causes, Practices and Effects of Wars Mike Wells Series editor: Allan Todd Cambridge University Press’s mission is to advance learning, knowledge and research worldwide. Our IB Diploma resources aim to: • encourage learners to explore concepts, ideas and topics that have local and global significance • help students develop a positive attitude to learning in preparation for higher education • assist students in approaching complex questions, applying critical-thinking skills and forming reasoned answers. cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Tokyo, Mexico City Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521189316 © Cambridge University Press 2011 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2011 Printed in Dubai at Oriental Press A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library ISBN 978-0-521-18931-6 Dedication To Kate, Julia and Oliver Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. This material
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Logistics and Logistical Strategies: How the Allies
    Strategic Logistics and Logistical Strategies: How the Allies Triumphed in Europe Military Historical Society of Massachusetts ROTC Essay Contest 2020 Cadet Kyle Hammalian Detachment 355, Air Force ROTC Boston University 1 April 2020 Contents Introduction 1 The Importance of Logistics in War 4 How American Logistics Changed After the Attack on Pearl Harbor 6 Invading North Africa: Lessons from Planning Operation TORCH 10 The Invasion of Italy: Amphibious Assault, Again 14 The Buildup to France: Operation BOLERO 17 The Invasion of France: Operation OVERLORD 20 Conclusion 26 Notes 30 Bibliography 35 Hammalian 1 Introduction Victory in Europe (V-E) Day celebrates the victorious Allies of World War II and the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany, which occurred on 8 May 1945. This year marks the 75th anniversary of V-E Day. Victory in Europe was the outcome of many years of sustained human conflict, supported by an unprecedented mobilization of military forces and the movement of massive amounts of materiel. Strategic decisions drove theater logistical requirements. Strategy includes both grand strategy and operational strategy. From a grand strategic perspective, war aims were set by political leaders such as President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill. Operation strategy, which includes planning military campaigns, was determined by military leaders like General George Marshall, General Dwight D. Eisenhower, and theater staff. Successful execution of operations at the tactical level can be attributed to the valor and dedication of Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, Airmen, and Coast Guardsman in battle. Logistical parameters constrained strategy. Leadership could set any strategy, and faithful service members could dedicate themselves to that objective, but no strategy can succeed without accounting for logistical considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • World War Ii Veteran’S Committee, Washington, Dc Under a Generous Grant from the Dodge Jones Foundation 2
    W WORLD WWAR IIII A TEACHING LESSON PLAN AND TOOL DESIGNED TO PRESERVE AND DOCUMENT THE WORLD’S GREATEST CONFLICT PREPARED BY THE WORLD WAR II VETERAN’S COMMITTEE, WASHINGTON, DC UNDER A GENEROUS GRANT FROM THE DODGE JONES FOUNDATION 2 INDEX Preface Organization of the World War II Veterans Committee . Tab 1 Educational Standards . Tab 2 National Council for History Standards State of Virginia Standards of Learning Primary Sources Overview . Tab 3 Background Background to European History . Tab 4 Instructors Overview . Tab 5 Pre – 1939 The War 1939 – 1945 Post War 1945 Chronology of World War II . Tab 6 Lesson Plans (Core Curriculum) Lesson Plan Day One: Prior to 1939 . Tab 7 Lesson Plan Day Two: 1939 – 1940 . Tab 8 Lesson Plan Day Three: 1941 – 1942 . Tab 9 Lesson Plan Day Four: 1943 – 1944 . Tab 10 Lesson Plan Day Five: 1944 – 1945 . Tab 11 Lesson Plan Day Six: 1945 . Tab 11.5 Lesson Plan Day Seven: 1945 – Post War . Tab 12 3 (Supplemental Curriculum/American Participation) Supplemental Plan Day One: American Leadership . Tab 13 Supplemental Plan Day Two: American Battlefields . Tab 14 Supplemental Plan Day Three: Unique Experiences . Tab 15 Appendixes A. Suggested Reading List . Tab 16 B. Suggested Video/DVD Sources . Tab 17 C. Suggested Internet Web Sites . Tab 18 D. Original and Primary Source Documents . Tab 19 for Supplemental Instruction United States British German E. Veterans Organizations . Tab 20 F. Military Museums in the United States . Tab 21 G. Glossary of Terms . Tab 22 H. Glossary of Code Names . Tab 23 I. World War II Veterans Questionnaire .
    [Show full text]
  • 70 Years of and Counting
    Federation of American Scientists 70 years of and counting Alexander DeVolpi Retired, Argonne National Laboratory Freeman Dyson Retired, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton University Charles D. Ferguson President, FAS Richard L. Garwin IBM Fellow Emeritus, IBM Thomas J. Watson CHARLES D. FERGUSON Research Center Editor in Chief Frank von Hippel ALLISON FELDMAN Co-Director, Program on Science and Global Managing and Creative Editor Security, Princeton University ___________ Robert S. Norris Senior Fellow for Nuclear Policy, FAS B. Cameron Reed Charles A. Dana Professor of Physics, Alma FAS Public Interest Report College 1725 DeSales Street NW Megan Sethi Suite 600 U.S. Historian and Adjunct Professor, Cal Poly Washington, DC 20036 Pomona and Southern New Hampshire PHONE: 202.546.3300 University FAX: 202.675.1010 Daniel Singer EMAIL: [email protected] Of Counsel, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & The PIR welcomes letters to the editor. Letters Jacobson LLP should not exceed 300 words and may be edited Jeremy J. Stone for length and clarity. Founder, Catalytic Diplomacy ___________ Annual print subscription is $100.00. An archive of FAS Public Interest Reports is available online at: http://fas.org/publications/public-interest- reports/. Cover image: U.S. military observe the explosion during Operation Crossroads Baker, a nuclear test conducted on Bikini Atoll on July 25, 1946. Source: U.S. Department of Defense. PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE: REINVENTION AND RENEWAL Charles D. Ferguson………………………………………………………………………………..1 THE LEGACY OF THE FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS Megan Sethi………………………………………………………………………………………...5 SCIENTISTS AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS, 1945-2015 Robert S. Norris…………………………………………………………………..…………….....12 GOVERNMENT SECRECY AND CENSORSHIP Alexander DeVolpi……………………………………………………………………………......15 FAS HISTORY, 1961-1963 Freeman Dyson…………………………………………………………………………...………23 FAS IN THE 1960s: FORMATIVE YEARS Daniel Singer………………………………………………………………………………...……26 REVITALIZING AND LEADING FAS: 1970-2000 Jeremy J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb” Is a Short History of the Origins and Develop- Ment of the American Atomic Bomb Program During World War H
    f.IOE/MA-0001 -08 ‘9g [ . J vb JMkirlJkhilgUimBA’mmml — .— Q RDlmm UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ,:.. .- ..-. .. -,.,,:. ,.<,.;<. ~-.~,.,.- -<.:,.:-,------—,.--,,p:---—;-.:-- ---:---—---- -..>------------.,._,.... ,/ ._ . ... ,. “ .. .;l, ..,:, ..... ..’, .’< . Copies of this publication are available while supply lasts from the OffIce of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. BOX 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Attention: Information Services Telephone: (423) 576-8401 Also Available: The United States Department of Energy: A Summary History, 1977-1994 @ Printed with soy ink on recycled paper DO13MA-0001 a +~?y I I Tho PROJEOT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY F.G. Gosling History Division Executive Secretariat Management and Administration Department of Energy ]January 1999 edition . DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. I DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. 1 Foreword The Department of Energy Organization Act of 1977 brought together for the first time in one department most of the Federal Government’s energy programs.
    [Show full text]