DOCSLIB.ORG

Saurashtra University Re – Accredited Grade ‘B’ by NAAC (CGPA 2.93)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Saurashtra University Re – Accredited Grade ‘B’ by NAAC (CGPA 2.93) Saurashtra University Re – Accredited Grade ‘B’ by NAAC (CGPA 2.93) Vyas, Maulik P., 2011, “Literature as Knowledge in Indian and Western Traditions”, thesis PhD, Saurashtra University http://etheses.saurashtrauniversity.edu/id/844 Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Saurashtra University Theses Service http://etheses.saurashtrauniversity.edu [email protected] © The Author Literature as Knowledge in Indian and Western Traditions Submitted for the Degree of Ph. D. in English to Saurashtra University, Rajkot SUPERVISOR: RESEARCHER: Avadhesh Kumar Singh Maulik P Vyas Director M.A. (English), M. Phil. School of Translation Studies Dept. of English & CLS & Training Saurashtra University I ndira Gandhi National O pen Rajkot, Gujarat U niversity , New Delhi December 2011 Literature as Knowledge in Indian and Western Traditions Submitted for the Degree of Ph. D. in English to Saurashtra University, Rajkot SUPERVISOR: RESEARCHER: Avadhe sh Kumar Singh Maulik P Vyas Director M.A. (English), M. Phil. School of Translation Studies Dept. of English & CLS & Training Saurashtra University Indira Gandhi N ational Open Rajkot, Gujarat University , New Delhi December 2011 Department of English & Comparative Literary Studies, Saurashtra University, Rajkot (Gujarat) CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the work embodied in this thesis entitled “Literature as Knowledge in Indian and Western Traditions” is submitted by the candidate Mr. Maulik Vyas for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the faculty of Arts of Saurashtra University, Rajkot, under my direct guidance and supervision. The present work is original and independent and no part of this thesis has been submitted for any other degree or diploma. Signature of the Guide: Professor Avadhesh Kumar Singh Director, Rajkot School of Translation Studies, Date: IGNOU, New Delhi Contents Sr. Title Page Preface 1-7 Introduction 8-35 Philosophical Theories 13 Episteme of Word 16 Poetry, Truth, and Logic 23 Literature as an Order 32 Ch.1 Epistemology of Knowledge in Indian and Western 36-168 Knowledge Systems I Western Epistemology 37 I.1 Greek Philosophy 40 I.2 Rationalism 66 I.3 Empiricism 68 I.4 Humean Theory of Causation 78 I.5 Kantian Synthesis 81 I.5.a Kant’s Theory of Knowledge 84 I.5.b Categories 90 I.5.c Causation 93 I.6 A View from an ‘Overman’ 98 I.7 Language Philosophy 99 I.8 Darwinist Deconstruction 101 II Indian Epistemology 106 II.a Antiquity of Darśanas 107 II.1 A View of Darśanas 111 II.2 Causal Doctrines in Indian Epistemology 117 II.2.1 Kāśaida’s Critique of Causal 122 Doctrine II.2.2 Analysis of Satkāryavāda 123 II.2.3 Analysis of Asatkāryavāda 125 II.2.4 Analysis of Pratityasamutpāda 128 II.2.5 Analysis of Vivartavāda 132 II.3 Nyāya-Vaiśesika 136 II.3.1 Padārthas: Epistemological 138 Categories II.4 Prāmānyavāda and Khyātivāda: Theories 141 of Valid Cognition and Error II.4.1 Classification of Pratyaksa Jñāna 145 II.4.2 Śabda (Verbal Testimony) 155 a. Nyāya View 156 b. Vaiśesika View 157 c. Mīmāmsā View of Prabhākara 158 d. Mīmāmsā View of Kumārila 159 e. Jaina & Buddhist views 161 Ch.2 Cosmology and Metaphysics of Literature in Indian 169-255 and Western Traditions 1. Taxonomic Musings in Literary Discourse 170 I Western Literary Taxonomy 172 II Indian Literary Taxonomy (with 187 Generic Models) 2. Criteria for Classification 199 3. Taxonomy of the Domains of Knowledge in 204 Kāvyamīmāmsā 4. Structural Divisions in Narrative Ecologies of the 214 Indian and Western Literary Traditions Ch.3 Literature as Knowledge and Knowledge of Literature 256-347 I Western Aesthetics 262 I.1 Logical Cause and Production Cause 264 I.1.1 Appropriate 266 I.1.2 Able 266 I.1.3 Beneficial 267 I.1.4 Aesthetic Pleasure 267 I.2 Representational Aesthetics 270 I.3 Aesthetic and Ecstasy 274 I.4 Aesthetic Qualities and Stasis 276 I.5 Aesthetic as Disinterested Pleasure 284 I.6 Romantic Aesthetics 288 I.7 Beauty and Sublime 290 I.8 Beauty as Ennobling Force 295 I.9 Resistance to Classification of Aesthetics 298 I.10 Hegel’s Aesthetics 305 I.11 Dissent 309 II Indian Aesthetics 313 II.1 Rasa Mīmāmsā 315 II.1.1 Abhinavagupta’s Analysis 323 II.1.2 Aesthetic Object and Its 331 Experience II.1.3 Abhinavagupta’s Views on 334 Kāvya II.2 Modern Views 337 II.2.1 Skeptical Views 341 Ch.4 Conclusion 348-384 I.1 Objections to Literature 351 I.1.a Categorical Criteria for 352 Contentions I.2 Means of Creativity 353 Responses to the Objections I.3 Figurative Language 355 I.4 Appearances 361 I.4.a Logical Inference, Figurative Analogy 366 and Illustration I.5 Literary Telos 373 Appendix Towards a Model for Integral Knowledge 378 Bibliography 385 PREFACE While working on the enriching course of Indian and Western poetics meandering through different concepts and schools—nascent and fully developed like alamkāra, guna-dosa, rīti, vakrokti, dhvani and rasa, as well as postulations made in the Greek philosophy, I saw that Indian culture of knowledge reached its zenith in Rājaśekhara (c 10 AD). His samgraha text Kāvyamimāmsā, constructed on the discoursal principles of mimāmsā tradition, involved a śāstraic rigour of organization, analysis and dissemination of knowledge on kāvya that formed my critique as an M. Phil. dissertation under able guidance of Professor Avadhesh Kumar Singh. This study lured me into the broader issues of literature as knowledge and knowledge of literature as conceived of sporadically in both the Indian and Western literary traditions. The present doctoral thesis, as it were, I acknowledge to be an extension of my work on Rājaśekhara that verily afforded the analytical modalities employed in the present thesis. This study concerning literature as knowledge may well be seen as a post hoc event after stirring up the history of ideas. Literary practice and its critical understanding have a prolonged and distinct past in both the Indian and Western knowledge cultures. The accounts of literary history in both the 2 counterparts amply exhibit how literature, as a seat of knowledge (vidyāsthāna) has availed with a systematic account of its nature and the methods for analysing it. This is, historically speaking, the first character of theory in literary discourse. The word ‘theory’ in literature, albeit, signifies today much more than this. The term theory indicates a general understanding of something in abstract and speculative terms arrived at after examining the function and constitution of the given phenomenon. Theorizing involves discovering complex relations of a systematic kind among numerous counterparts. A theoretical framework promises valid knowledge on its own premise of its subject irrespective of localities of historical time and varying instances of its subject in different knowledge cultures. However, the history of ideas shows that theorizing must follow the event. All good theoretical works in Indian and Western traditions have been preceded by a very buoyant time of creative practices of first order. Theory is then speculation on the basis of the evidence. The overarching term ‘literary theory’ encompasses within its fold ‘critical theory’ and ‘literary theory’. The critical theory predicates on ideological positions and at times conceives of literature with redemptive powers. The literary theory, on the other hand, leads one to the domain of epistemology of knowledge and discoursal devices; metaphysics and cosmology of literature in Indian and Western knowledge systems, which are 3 the sole constituents in the present dissertation. In the philosophical traditions of India and the West, some concerns pertaining to ‘ability to know’, ‘knowing’, ‘knowledge’, ‘knowables’, and ‘end of knowledge’ have been approached with diverse positions. The present study in its course aims to undertake the following: To enquire into the Indian and Western traditions of epistemology and their consequent impact on literary concepts and theoretical principles in a comparative manner. To analyze a systemic construction of taxonomic frameworks in Indian and the Western literary traditions. To critique the aesthetic in Indian and Western conceptual frameworks. This would involve concerns such as defining the aesthetic, the art; chronological study of aesthetics, resistance to classification of the aesthetic, nature of aesthetic experience, sublime and beautiful, and similarities and dissimilarities between Indian and western concepts and categories of the aesthetic. To consider the ontological status of literature in the respective knowledge traditions by focusing on the attacks on and defences of poetry. Further, to know how literary discourse distinguishes itself 4 from other verbal discourses such as science, sociology, history, philosophy among others. It is hoped that the present study, while operating from the premise of literary theory and not critical theory, would postulate and critique the necessary departures and interventions in the history of knowledge traditions of the West and India and thereby arrive at a wider perspective of the issue. I take this opportunity to end the prefatory note by acknowledging the contributions of all who made this study possible. I, first and foremost, express my truest gratitude to my guru Professor Avadhesh Kumar Singh, Director, School of Translation Studies, IGNOU, New Delhi, and my Supervisor, who initiated me into the world of academics. His perceptive and caring guidance has formed and sustained me as a research scholar and human being in this frustrating yet elating pursuit of the research.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critique of Plato's Conception of Morality with Reference to the Teachers' Expected Examination Integrity in Kenya
    A CRITIQUE OF PLATO’S CONCEPTION OF MORALITY WITH REFERENCE TO THE TEACHERS’ EXPECTED EXAMINATION INTEGRITY IN KENYA EDWARD MAINA ANDAFU A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI 2019 DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and it has not been presented for any award of a Degree or Diploma in any other University. ……………………………… ……………………… Edward Maina Andafu Date REG. No. E84/52028/2017 This thesis has been submitted for examination with our approval as the University Supervisors. Signature………………….. Date ……………………. Dr Atieno Kili K’Odhiambo Senior Lecturer in Philosophy of Education Department of Educational Foundations University of Nairobi Signature…………………… Date ……………………. Professor Samson Okuro Gunga Professor of Philosophy of Education Department of Educational Foundations University of Nairobi II DEDICATION This work is dedicated to all the members of my immediate family: my wife Dorcus Ofuyo, my sons, Lewis Andafu and Wesley Andafu, for their everlasting love; also to my late father Julius Andafu, and my late mother Ketry Andafu, who always had confidence in me. III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I hereby acknowledge the following for their immense contribution to my work. My first thanks go to my very able supervisors, Dr Atieno Kili K’Odhiambo and Professor Samson Okuro Gunga who have mentored me through this work. I thank members of the Department of Educational Foundations, University of Nairobi whose positive criticism put me on the right track in pursuit of my studies. I am grateful to Dr Wycliffe Amukowa (Machakos University) for his moral and intellectual support towards the accomplishment of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 X 10. Three Lines .P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-83746-0 - Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King Carl A. Huffman Index More information Select index of Greek words and phrases discussed in the text delf»v/delf, 64, 123, 125, 154 galnh, 66, 75, 491, 494–500, 504–05, 515 kanqa, 341 gr, 122–23 ll»triov, 194–95 gewmetrw, 567 nagka©wv, 396 gewmetrik, 232–33, 244 ndocov, 39–40 gewmetrik»v, 244 na©sqhtov, 449 nakmptw, 538 de»menoi, 217–18 naklw, 476–77 dicr»nou , 291 nakÅptw, 322 diagignÛskw, 58–59, 149–51 nalog©a, 179–81, 503, 529–37, 538; toÓ ­sou, diagnÛmen, xiv, 149 529–37 dignwsiv, 58–59, 149–51 nlogon, 179 digramma, 396, 566 namon, 291 d©aita, partn d©aitan , 300–01 nastrof, 123, 155 diallttw, 215 nepistmwn, 193–94 disthma, 166–67, 169, 181, 458 n»moiov, tn»moia , 436, 441–43 diatrib, 228–32 ntere©dw, 561 dunmenoi, 217–18 ntreisma, 297 dÅnamiv, 446 nt©lhyiv, 451 dusmcanov, 79, 348, 375, 379 nÛmalov, 513–15 nwmal»thv, 513 gg©gnomai, 539 »ristov, 511 e²dov, 93, 123, 226, 238, 250–51, 567; pqeia, 600, 603 (prÛtiston), 122 pantizw, 113, 156 e«kÛn, 601 planv, 542–43 kle©pw, 247 podeiktikäv, 375, 379 mp»diov, 335 p»deixiv, 71, 232, 237–38, mfusw, 113, 160 248–49 n aÉt, 222 podcomai, 503–04 nant©ov, 445 porov, 195 nargv, 71, 233, 236–37, 238, 246–47 pofrssw, 160 narm»zw, 351 riqmhtik, 240–44 xeur©skw, 193, 195, 196–200, 202 rmon©a, tperª tn rmon©an , 565 peiskwmzw, 314, 322 rc, 358, 500, 502, 598 piqumhtik»v, 93 rc kaª mhtr»poliv, 69 p©stamai, 196–200 %rcÅtav, 619 pistmwn, 193–94 stronomik»v, 244 pistthv, 389 aÎxh, 80, 386 pitelw, 72, 237–38, 247, 249 aÉt¼v fa, 55 pitmnw, 587 stÛ, 96 banausourg©a, 380 scatov oÉran»v, 87 638 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-83746-0 - Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King Carl A.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 05 August 2016 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Horky, Phillip Sidney. (2015) 'Pseudo-Archytas protreptics? On Wisdom in its context.', in Second sailing : alternative perspectives on Plato. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica, pp. 21-39. Commentationes humanarum litterarum. (132). Further information on publisher's website: https://www.tiedekirja./default/second-sailing-alternative-perspectives-on-plato.html Publisher's copyright statement: Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Societas Scientiurom Fennica Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 132 2015 The Finnish Society of Scknces and Letters Address: Fabianinkaru 4 B 16, FIN~ 00130 Helsinki, Finland In Swedish: Finska Vetenskaps-Societeten, Fabiansgatan 4 B 16, FIN-· 00130 Helsingfurs In Finnish: Suomen 11edeseura, Fabianinkaru 4 B 16,00130 Helsinki Commentationer. Humanarun Litterarum 1ht series, founded in 1923, publishes since 1996 monographs on antiquity and its tradition, SECOND SAILING: Editor: Alternative Perspectives on Plato Pro£ cm.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Theaetetus Jennifer F
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2007 Virtue and inquiry, knowledge and ignorance: Lessons from the Theaetetus Jennifer F. Ingle University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Ingle, Jennifer F., "Virtue and inquiry, knowledge and ignorance: Lessons from the Theaetetus" (2007). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2227 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Virtue and Inquiry, Knowledge and Ignorance: Lessons From the Theaetetus by Jennifer F. Ingle A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Joanne B. Waugh, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: John P. Anton, Ph.D. Roger Ariew, Ph.D. Charles Guignon, Ph.D. Bruce Silver, Ph.D. P. Christopher Smith, Ph.D Date of Approval: April 9, 2007 Keywords: Plato, paideia, hermeneutic interpretation, epistemology, classical Greece © Copyright 2007, Jennifer F. Ingle For Jane, who gave me life, and for Joanne, who saved it. Table of Contents Dedication Abstract iii Chapter One: Situating Plato’s Dialogues
    [Show full text]
  • Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing
    Plato and the art of philosophical writing Author: Marina McCoy Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/3016 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Pre-print version of an article published in Ancient Philosophy 31(1): 203-208. doi:10.5840/ancientphil201131110. These materials are made available for use in research, teaching and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright Law. The user must assume full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used for academic research or otherwise should be fully credited with the source. The publisher or original authors may retain copyright to the materials. Pre-print version of an article published in Ancient Philosophy 31(1): 203-208. doi:10.5840/ancientphil201131110. Review of Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing by Christopher Rowe (Cambridge University Press, 2007) by Marina McCoy, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Boston College. Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing is an engaging and well-argued book that focuses on both Socratic epistemology and the nature of Platonic argument. Rowe begins with candor: the issues surrounding dialogical interpretation are vast; as one of his students stated, the dialogues are “weird” (p. 2), because they require a different sort of interpretation than that given to treatises where the author’s meaning is transparent. Plato, in contrast, offers his interpreters challenges such as, wondering why Socrates makes a claim in one dialogue that is opposed in another; whether Socrates is the “voice” of Plato and, if so, how; how the dating of the dialogues (if possible at all) informs our interpretation of Plato’s thinking; the relationship between dialectic and dialogue; and how dramatic style and content are interrelated, to name only a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Platonic Economic Theory: the Economics of Moderation
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1983 Platonic Economic Theory: the Economics of Moderation. Kenneth Neal Townsend Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Townsend, Kenneth Neal, "Platonic Economic Theory: the Economics of Moderation." (1983). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3942. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3942 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poetic Imagination in Heidegger and Schelling
    The Poetic Imagination in Heidegger and Schelling Author: Christopher S. Yates Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/3056 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2011 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Philosophy THE POETIC IMAGINATION IN HEIDEGGER AND SCHELLING a dissertation by CHRISTOPHER S. YATES submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May, 2011 © copyright by CHRISTOPHER S. YATES 2011 ii The Poetic Imagination in Heidegger and Schelling Christopher Yates Advisor: John Sallis Readers: Richard Kearney, Jason Wirth Abstract This dissertation investigates the importance of the imagination in the thought of F.W. J. Schelling and Martin Heidegger, and argues that Heidegger’s later philosophy cannot be understood properly without appreciating Schelling’s central importance for him. It is increasingly recognized today that Schelling, who had long been overlooked, is an important figure in post-Kantian German Idealism. However, his significance for Heidegger’s concentration on the creative character of thought remains undervalued. I argue that, by tracing the theme of imagination in these thinkers, the milieu of Schelling’s absolute idealism and that of Heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenlogy may be understood as distinct discourses that nevertheless share in a profound impulse to overcome sensible- intelligible and subject-object dualisms and retrieve and refine the productive and projective character of reason. This impulse is first evident in both thinkers’ attention to the role of imagination in Kant’s critical project (for Schelling, cir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic's Reluctant Rulers
    Binghamton University The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB) The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter 4-2012 The Republic’s Reluctant Rulers Christopher Buckels University of California at Davis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, and the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Buckels, Christopher, "The Republic’s Reluctant Rulers" (2012). The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter. 470. https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp/470 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter by an authorized administrator of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Republic’s Reluctant Rulers Christopher Buckels, UC Davis Presented to the Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy at its meeting with The Pacific Division of the American Philosophical Association April, 2012 In this paper I attempt to resolve three closely related problems concerning philosophers’ rule over Kallipolis in the Republic.1 First and foremost, when it seems that the rulers should willingly take up ruling, since it is just to rule and the rulers are just people, why does Plato emphasize that they must be compelled to rule? Second, since just acts are beneficial, how does ruling, qua just act, benefit philosophers? Third, since Plato has been accused of jumping unfairly between just actions and just souls, what exactly is the connection between the two? I submit that these questions are intricately related, so that the answer for each depends on that of the next.
    [Show full text]
  • Psycholinguistics and Plato's Paradoxes of the Meno
    Psycholinguistics and Plato's Paradoxes of the Meno WALTER B. WEIMER Pennsylvania State University1 Two fundamental problems in both psychology and the best available. Thus, I shall defend Plato in- philosophy concern the nature of knowledge and directly (a) by showing that his doctrines are both the nature of our acquisition of knowledge. No intelligible and "scientific" today and (b) by indi- matter how "pure" it may be in research interest cating that opposing theories are quite incapable of and theoretical intent, psychology ought to be very providing adequate solutions. applied in the sense that it should seriously attempt to answer our fundamental questions concerning the Plato's Problems in the Meno nature of human knowledge and the process by which it is acquired. Yet, despite the spectacular It has long been a favorite philosophical pastime to successes experimental psychology has had in its propose the true problem or paradox that Plato in- attempt to understand the phenomena of its domain, tended the Meno to portray, and then to supply it remains to be seen whether the answers advanced the true resolution of that problem. It is not my to fundamental problems such as the two above are purpose to engage in this fruitless game of true adequate, or whether they are indeed answers at all. Plato exegesis and scholarship: there is a case to This article explores two problems of knowledge, be made for many legitimate problems in the Meno, which take the form of paradoxes, from their origins and undoubtedly some are more important, and in Plato's Meno to their reemergence in contempo- more difficult, than others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Practice of the Presence of God: the Best Rule of Holy Brother Lawrence Life
    The Practice of the Presence of God: The Best Rule of Holy Brother Lawrence Life Table of Contents About This Book. p. ii The Practice of the Presence of God: The Best Rule of Holy Life. p. 1 Preface. p. 2 Conversations. p. 3 First Conversation. p. 3 Second Conversation. p. 4 Third Conversation. p. 6 Fourth Conversation. p. 7 Letters. p. 10 First Letter. p. 10 Second Letter. p. 11 Third Letter. p. 13 Fourth Letter. p. 13 Fifth Letter. p. 15 Sixth Letter. p. 15 Seventh Letter. p. 16 Eighth Letter. p. 17 Ninth Letter. p. 17 Tenth Letter. p. 18 Eleventh Letter. p. 19 Twelfth Letter. p. 20 Thirteenth Letter. p. 20 Fourteenth Letter. p. 21 Fifteenth Letter. p. 22 Appendix to electronic edition. p. 23 Indexes. p. 24 Index of Scripture References. p. 24 iii The Practice of the Presence of God: The Best Rule of Holy Brother Lawrence Life iv The Practice of the Presence of God: The Best Rule of Holy Brother Lawrence Life The Practice of the Presence of God: The Best Rule of Holy Life being Conversations and Letters of Brother Lawrence Good when He gives, supremely good; Nor less when He denies: Afflictions, from His sovereign hand, Are blessings in disguise. AUTHENTIC EDITION LONDON THE EPWORTH PRESS (Edgar C Barton) 25-35 City Road, E.C.1 The Practice of the Presence of God: The Best Rule of Holy Brother Lawrence Life PREFACE ªI believe in the ... communion of saints.º SURELY if additional proof of its reality were needed, it might be found in the universal oneness of experimental Christianity in all ages and in all lands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christology of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite: the Fourth Letter in Its Indirect and Direct Text Traditions1
    THE CHRISTOLOGY OF PSEUDO-DIONYSIUS THE AREOPAGITE: THE FOURTH LETTER IN ITS INDIRECT AND DIRECT TEXT TRADITIONS1 1. A Hypothesis by Ronald Hathaway In his erudite and imaginative book, Hierarchy and the Definition of Order in the Letters of Pseudo-Dionysius, Ronald Hathaway proposed a bold interpretation of Dionysius’ Letters. Among many other interesting insights he noted the following. He observed that the first nine Letters constitute the summary of Dionysius’ positive theology2, the tenth being only a kind of addendum to this micro-Corpus. Moreover, he noted that the size of the individual Letters corresponded to what Dionysius said in the Mystical Theology about the increasing number of words that the dif- ferent parts of his theology required, culminating in the Symbolic Theol- ogy, which is treated in the most voluminous way3. In the same way, 1 The bulk of this study was written in Princeton, during a Stanley J. Seeger Visiting Fellowship that I held in 2002/03, enjoying the wonderful hospitality of the Program in Hellenic Studies at Princeton University. It is my most pleasant duty to extend my heart- felt gratitude to the President of the Program, Peter Brown, to its Director, Dimitri Gondicas, to its able and kind co-ordinator, Carol Oberto and her staff, the staff of the incomparable Firestone Library, and last, but not least, to Paul Rorem, with whom I had the privilege to spend long hours discussing Dionysius and who kindly read and com- mented on an earlier version of this paper. Without the help of all these persons and of many others in Princeton, whom I cannot mention here, this paper and a number of other ones, published or unpublished yet, could never have been written.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nineteen Letters of Ben Uziel, Being a Spiritual Presentation of The
    ^^^XJZIEL HftMeMffr FyVBBI SAMSOK RAPHAEL HIHSCH TRANSLATED BY F^V-DI^BEHNAf^ Dl^ACHMAN S.i^.il Mtqmntitth hg J|tm to tlj0 ICtbrartf of Prtnrrton SljMlogtral g^^mtttarg 560 .H4813 1899 BM 180^ Hirsch, Samson Raphael, -1888. of Ben„^_ The nineteen letters Zhc Bineteen Xetters OF Ben msicl Being a Spiritual Presentation of the Prin- ciples of Judaism BY Samson IRapbaef IT^trscb Laie Rabbi of the Israelitische Religionsgesellschaft of Frankfort-on-the-Main TRANSLATED BY BernarD' Bracbman, iPb.D. Rabbi ofthe Congregation Zichron Ephraim and Dean of the fewish Theological Seminary, New York TOGETHER WITH A PREFACE AND A BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF THE AUTHOR BY THE TRANSLATOR ffun?^ 8. Ma^nalls Company NEW YORK AND LONDON 1899 Copyright, 1899, by FUNK & WAGNAI,I,S COMPANY [Registered at vStationers' Hall, England] PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES tikis'? i<hi Ti'trjr nin^S xStr yisb pnn 'i'?:? Sxnc'n npSn?3 nni nSb^ in'ssS x'^k k^k nn ' ' Be/ore Thee it is revealed and known that not for my glory or the glory of my father' s house have I done this, but for Thy glory that discord m,ay not increase in Is7'ael.'' —Megillah, p. j. SAMSON RAPHAEI. HIRSCH I.ate Rabbi of the Lsraelitische Religionsgesellschaft (Israelitish Society for Religion) of Frankfort-on-the-Main, Germany To the Ever Cherished Memory of My Mother This Book is Dedicated in Filial Love and Devotion The Translator CONTENTS PAGE Translator's Preface, v Samson Raphael Hirsch. — A Biographical ix Sketch, , . Author's Preface, xxxv First Letter.
    [Show full text]