DOCSLIB.ORG

Jewish Resistance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Durham E-Theses Philo-Semites, Anti-Semites and France's Jewish Communities in the late Third Republic (c.1900-1940) YOO, YOUNGHO How to cite: YOO, YOUNGHO (2020) Philo-Semites, Anti-Semites and France's Jewish Communities in the late Third Republic (c.1900-1940), Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13909/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Philo-Semites, Anti-Semites and France’s Jewish Communities in the late Third Republic (c.1900-1940) Youngho Yoo Master of Arts (by Thesis) History Department Durham University 2020 1 Abstract This study analyses the attitudes of a wide spectrum of political commentators and the press on Jews in France between the 1880s and 1930s, and how these debates affected the self- understanding and mutual perspectives of the two distinctive French Jewish communities – the long-established Jews (known as Israélites) and the foreign Jews (known as Juifs). The First chapter explains the formation and development of French Jews in the Third French Republic, demonstrating the relations between distinctive Jewish communities. Next two chapters explore philo-Semitic and anti-Semitic feelings of the French Right and Left. These chapters discuss the two opposite views of each political side on Jews and show their ambivalent positions that coexisted according to their own criteria. The last chapter investigates the attitudes of Israélites and Juifs to each other and France, particularly in relationship to Zionist ideas. It explains the precarious situation of Juifs and Zionism as a self-defense strategy for them against anti-Semitic threats and the indifferent attitude of Israélites There was not a single opinion from one political or social group regarding Jewish communities in the Third French Republic. Rather, anti-Semitic and philo-Semitic feelings were distributed across the French Right and Left. These perspectives also changed continuously during the Dreyfus Affair, the First World War and the interwar period. In particular, the two Jewish communities were forced to reconsider their identity following the mass migration of Eastern European Jews and the rising anti-Semitic climate in French society. This resulted in friction and tensions between the two Jewish communities. 2 Table of Contents Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 - Historiography ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 - Methods and Sources ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 - Chapter Layout -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 Chapter 1: Formation and Development of the Native French Jews in Modern France ------ 19 - Mutual Perspectives of Two Native Jews -------------------------------------------------- 26 - French Perspectives Towards the Two Jewish Communities ---------------------------- 30 - Becoming ‘Israélite’ in French Society ----------------------------------------------------- 33 - Mass Migration of Foreign Jews ------------------------------------------------------------ 35 - Daily Life of ‘Juif’ in France ---------------------------------------------------------------- 39 - Reactions of Non-Jewish Migrants ---------------------------------------------------------- 43 - Impact of Mass Migration: Reactions of French Society -------------------------------- 44 - Impact on the Israélite Community --------------------------------------------------------- 48 Chapter 2: Perspectives of Right-Wing towards Jews --------------------------------------------- 52 - Anti-Semitism of Right-Wing --------------------------------------------------------------- 52 - Anti-Semitism in Conservative Presses --------------------------------------------------- 55 - ‘Unassimilable’ Jews ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 61 - French Catholics ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 64 - Anti-Semitism and Immigrant Jews -------------------------------------------------------- 66 - Philo-Semitism of Right-Wing -------------------------------------------------------------- 67 Chapter 3: Perspectives of Left-Wing towards Jews ---------------------------------------------- 83 - Anti-Semitism of Left-Wing ---------------------------------------------------------------- 84 - Economy --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 84 - Politics ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 89 - Anti-Semitism towards Left-Wing Jews -------------------------------------------------- 92 - Philo-Semitism of Left-Wing --------------------------------------------------------------- 98 - Humanitarian Value ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 100 - The Left against the Anti-Semitism of the Radical Right ------------------------------ 103 - Discovery of Jewish Proletariat ----------------------------------------------------------- 104 - Humanitarian and Internationalism ------------------------------------------------------- 107 - Philo-Semitism as Anti-Anti-Semitism against the Radical Right ------------------- 110 - Philo-Semitism and Jewish Proletariat in Interwar France ---------------------------- 111 Chapter 4: Jewish Resistance: Jewish Identity and Nationalism through Zionism ---------- 114 - Threats of Native French Jews in the Third Republic ---------------------------------- 115 - Zionism --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 117 Conclusion --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 132 - Fate of Jewish Communities in 1940 ----------------------------------------------------- 132 - Prospective Directions of Further Research --------------------------------------------- 137 Bibliography ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 140 3 Introduction The history of the Jews in modern France needs to be understood in its diversity, since the Jewish population was made up of multiple communities. There were distinctive Jewish communities, including an assimilated French Jewish community and foreign immigrant Jewish society in the twentieth century; before the twentieth century, there was also a visible separation between the Sephardi Jews and Ashkenazi Jews. This separation had existed for centuries, and certainly preceded the French Revolution of 1789, rooted in various contexts of migration, professional mobility and legal privilege. Experiences of Jewish communities in France were rarely identical, and often diverged. Some points of contrast include the process and time period of assimilation, their attitudes towards French national identity, and their self- understanding. Regardless of their different – sometimes ambivalent – experiences, French Jews could not avoid the mass murder that happened in the Shoah. The Vichy government did not hesitate to indiscriminately persecute Jewish citizens and Jewish immigrants. Moreover, with Vichy France’s active assistances, the Nazis murdered more than 77,000 Jews in France by deporting them to extermination camps. This number was more than twenty-four per cent of the entire Jewish population who lived in metropolitan France at the end of 1940.1 In the summer of 1942, approximately 13,000 foreign Jews, including women and their French-born children, were arrested by French police. Many of them were held at Vélodrome d'Hiver and other places, such as Drancy camp, guarded by French gendarmes. Subsequently, they were deported to extermination camps in East. Up until the end of the Second World War, the Vichy regime never 1 Susan Zuccotti, The Holocaust, the French, and the Jews (New York, 1993), pp. 280. 4 ceased to round up Jews; they found and arrested their Jewish citizens, including recently naturalised Jews and assimilated Jews (who were usually from long-established Jewish families) without drawing any distinction. As Michael Marrus and Robert Paxton proved in their seminal book, Vichy France and the Jews, the Vichy regime was never passive in the process of arrests of Jews in France, but rather actively participated in the Nazis’ horrendous project. Donna Ryan, in The Holocaust & the Jews of Marseilles, has demonstrated the active collaboration of French officials in persecuting Jews through her case study on Marseille which remained in the Free Zone. Her research reconfirms the Vichy regime’s active collaboration in stripping native and foreign Jews, as well as the Jews of North Africa, of their citizenship.2 Her research indicates the converging fate of Jews in France during the Second World War. It did not
Recommended publications
  • Louis Rougier : Vie Et Œuvre D'un Philosophe Engagé

    Louis Rougier : Vie Et Œuvre D'un Philosophe Engagé

    Philosophia Scientiæ Travaux d'histoire et de philosophie des sciences CS 7 | 2007 Louis Rougier : vie et œuvre d'un philosophe engagé Louis Rougier : itinéraire intellectuel et politique, des années vingt à Nouvelle École Olivier Dard Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/429 DOI : 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.429 ISSN : 1775-4283 Éditeur Éditions Kimé Édition imprimée Date de publication : 1 janvier 2007 Pagination : 50-64 ISBN : 978-2-84174-412-1 ISSN : 1281-2463 Référence électronique Olivier Dard, « Louis Rougier : itinéraire intellectuel et politique, des années vingt à Nouvelle École », Philosophia Scientiæ [En ligne], CS 7 | 2007, mis en ligne le 08 juin 2011, consulté le 15 janvier 2021. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/429 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/ philosophiascientiae.429 Tous droits réservés Louis Rougier : itinéraire intellectuel et politique, des années vingt à Nouvelle École Olivier Dard CRULH - Université Paul Verlaine - Metz Depuis sa mort, Louis Rougier (1889-1982) est largement oublié par le débat public et l’historiographie. Les libéraux en particulier, dont Rou- gier fut un des hérauts ne se sont guère réclamés de son héritage, à l’exception de Maurice Allais [Allais 1990]. La dimension sulfureuse at- tachée au personnage et liée à ses sympathies vichyssoises (qu’il faut remettre en perspective) comme à sa proximité avec la Nouvelle droite1 n’ont sans doute rien arrangé. C’est quoi qu’il en soit Alain de Benoist, fondateur et principal animateur de la Nouvelle droite et qui fut à la fois un intime et un disciple philosophique de Rougier au début des années 60 qui a perpétué le plus fidèlement son héritage en rééditant certains de ses livres avec des préfaces substantielles.2 Du côté de l’historiogra- phie, l’éclairage sur Rougier se limite à deux épisodes principaux : sa participation au néo-libéralisme de l’entre-deux-guerres et au colloque Philosophia Scientiæ, Cahier spécial 7, 2007, 50–64.
  • The Logic of Violence in Civil War Has Much Less to Do with Collective Emotions, Ideologies, Cultures, Or “Greed and Grievance” Than Currently Believed

    The Logic of Violence in Civil War Has Much Less to Do with Collective Emotions, Ideologies, Cultures, Or “Greed and Grievance” Than Currently Believed

    P1: KAE 0521854091pre CUNY324B/Kalyvas 0 521 85409 1 March 27, 2006 20:2 This page intentionally left blank ii P1: KAE 0521854091pre CUNY324B/Kalyvas 0 521 85409 1 March 27, 2006 20:2 TheLogic of Violence in Civil War By analytically decoupling war and violence, this book explores the causes and dynamics of violence in civil war. Against prevailing views that such violence is either the product of impenetrable madness or a simple way to achieve strategic objectives, the book demonstrates that the logic of violence in civil war has much less to do with collective emotions, ideologies, cultures, or “greed and grievance” than currently believed. Stathis Kalyvas distinguishes between indis- criminate and selective violence and specifies a novel theory of selective violence: it is jointly produced by political actors seeking information and indi- vidual noncombatants trying to avoid the worst but also grabbing what oppor- tunities their predicament affords them. Violence is not a simple reflection of the optimal strategy of its users; its profoundly interactive character defeats sim- ple maximization logics while producing surprising outcomes, such as relative nonviolence in the “frontlines” of civil war. Civil war offers irresistible opportu- nities to those who are not naturally bloodthirsty and abhor direct involvement in violence. The manipulation of political organizations by local actors wishing to harm their rivals signals a process of privatization of political violence rather than the more commonly thought politicization of private life. Seen from this perspective, violence is a process taking place because of human aversion rather than a predisposition toward homicidal violence, which helps explain the para- dox of the explosion of violence in social contexts characterized by high levels of interpersonal contact, exchange, and even trust.
  • French Antisemitism in the Press from 1894 to 1945

    French Antisemitism in the Press from 1894 to 1945

    Bastions or Brutes: French Antisemitism in the Press from 1894 to 1945 Nathan J. Johnson Texas Tech University 1 Abstract: Modern Era Europe, a time strife with power struggle, nationalistic growth, and scarred people and landscapes. France, a country unsheltered from the era’s terrors, faced a great struggle not unique to the rest of Europe; a country, a political mechanism, and populations of people supporting and accelerating Antisemitic beliefs. The once brave bastions of freedom once again fell into tyranny - a self-tyranny in a sense - where racism and antisemitism ruled their agendas. Beginning with Alfred Dreyfus and his exile and still propagating to this day, the Free French have become less about freedom and more about oppression and purification. At the root of this evil stood several major French publications, pushing a political mechanism. How were these publications controlled, were they under ideological control of the government? Are the journalists of these publications under guise of the propaganda machine or are they free thinking individuals who whole heartedly see the Jewish population to blame for major French downfalls? Are the “freedom fighters”, who are writing in protection of the Jewish population, doing so by way of clear conscious or career incentivization? What personal risks do these journalists take from the burden of speaking their truths? Also, as the period progresses and the 20th century truly takes hold, are the antisemitic beliefs held by the French remnants of the Dreyfus Affair, or are they influenced by current ideas held in Nazi Germany? 2 Introduction: Modern French history is ripe with triumph and exhilaration, but also stress, disruptions, and mistakes.
  • The Origins of the Banlieue Rouge: Politics, Local Government and Communal Identity in Arcueil and Cachan, 1919-1958

    The Origins of the Banlieue Rouge: Politics, Local Government and Communal Identity in Arcueil and Cachan, 1919-1958

    The Origins of the Banlieue Rouge: Politics, Local Government and Communal Identity in Arcueil and Cachan, 1919-1958. by Jasen Lewis Burgess A thesis submitted to the University of New South Wales in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History 2005 © Jasen Lewis Burgess, 2005 Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the numerous individuals and various institutions that assisted me in the completion of this thesis. The critical appraisal, guidance and support provided by my supervisor Professor Martyn Lyons during the writing of this thesis have been indispensable. Professor Lyons helped initiate my research topic, gave firm, fair and timely advice on the structure and content of this thesis, and has commented on and proofread innumerable drafts. I would also like to thank him for his general support of my candidature, in particular the support he gave to me when I suspended my candidature at the time of the birth of my first son Leon and then when I resumed my candidature some time later. I would like to thank Professor Jacques Girault who suggested Arcueil and Cachan as a thesis topic when I met with him during my first research trip to Paris in 1998, and who also gave me invaluable advice on where to research my thesis in Paris and what journals to consult. I am also grateful to the staff of the Archives Départementales du Val-de-Marne at Creteil, France, for the vital assistance they gave me in my research, including posting material to me in Sydney. Thanks also to the Documentation and Archival Services for the Commune of Arcueil for sending material to me in Sydney, and to the staff at the Musée sociale and the Centre du Recherches d’Histoire des Mouvements Sociaux et Syndicalisme for the assistance they gave me when researching my thesis in Paris.
  • Le Premier Janvier 1960

    Le Premier Janvier 1960

    LE 1er JANVIER 1960 Du même auteur LES IMPITOYABLES, nouvelles. AU-DELA DE LA MONTAGNE, roman (Le Livre de Paris). LES OISEAUX N'Y SAVENT PAS CHANTER, essai (Julliard). LA LÉGENDE DE PABLO CASALS, essai (Editions Proa). LES ETONNEMENTS DE MISTER NEWBORN, roman - Prix Courte- line 1955 (Julliard). LES PROMENADES DE M. TRIPOIRE, roman (Julliard). LA VIGNE SOUS LE REMPART, roman - Prix Sully-Olivier de Serres 1957 (Julliard). LES HOMMES NE SONT PAS DES HÉROS, roman (Julliard). LA SUCCESSION, essai (Julliard). YALTA, OU LE PARTAGE DU MONDE - Prix Historia 1964, Prix Plaisir de lire 1964 (Robert Laffont). BANDOUNG, UN CARREFOUR DE L'HISTOIRE (Robert Laffont). SIRE, ILS ONT VOTÉ LA MORT, essai sur la mort de Louis XVI (Robert Laffont). UN PRINCE CHERCHE UN ROYAUME, essai (Hachette). SANS DE GAULLE, essai (Pion). LÉNINE ET STALINE, essai (Plon). L'EPOPÉE MONDIALE D'UN SIÈCLE, essai (Hachette). LES FRÈRES BURNS, roman (Julliard). HOMMES LIBRES... (Plon). ... ET LES COYOTES HURLERONT (Julliard). LE PREMIER JANVIER 1900 (Plon). LE PREMIER JANVIER 1920 (Plon). LE PREMIER JANVIER 1940 (Plon). Prix Agrippa d'Aubigné 1978. En préparation L'AVENTURE EUROPÉENNE. 1. De Minos aux Rois Soleils. 2. De Mozart à Gagarine. ARTHUR CONTE Le 1er Janvier 1960 PLON La loi du 11 mars 1957 n'autorisant, aux termes des alinéas 2 et 3 de l'article 41, d'une part, que les « copies ou reproductions strictement réservées à l'usage privé du copiste et non destinées à une " col-un lective » et, d'autre part, que les analyses et les courtes cl^tions dans u but d'exemple et d'illustration, « toute représentation ou rePr°îuflon grale, ou partielle, faite sans le consentement de 1 auteur ou de ses ayants droit ou ayants cause, est illicite » (alinéa 1er de 1 article ).
  • Historique De L'action Française

    Historique De L'action Française

    Historique de l’Action française Marie Lan Nguyen (ENS) 2004 1 Les débuts (1899–1918) 1.1 L’Affaire Dreyfus aux origines de l’Action française 1.1.1 Charles Maurras Charles Maurras naît en 1868 à Martigues d’un père percepteur des impôts, libéral et romantique, et d’une mère dévote et royaliste. À l’issue de ses études secondaires, il monte à Paris et devient journaliste, travaillant d’abord à La Cocarde (boulangiste) puis à la Gazette de France et au Soleil, journaux royalistes. Grand admirateur de la Grèce, ses préoccupations sont alors essentiellement littéraires. Il s’engage dans l’action politique à l’occasion de l’affaire Dreyfus. Convaincu d’abord de la culpabilité de Dreyfus, il admet ensuite ensuite le doute. Mais pour lui, même la souffrance d’un innocent doit s’effacer devant la stabilité de l’armée et de la France, mise en péril par l’affaire. Dans cet esprit, il lance en 1898 dans la Gazette de France l’idée du « faux patriotique Henry ». C’est son grand mot d’ordre, « le Politique d’abord ». Le but de Maurras est d’ériger un système positif et machiavélien, partant du « postulat nationaliste », contre la décadence ayant suivi la défaite de 1870, et plus avant encore la Révolution française, mère d’une société corrompue où manque le principe unitaire monarchique. Pour Maurras, quatre « états confédérés » composent l’Anti-France et ont donné lieu à la démocratie parlementaire : ce sont les Juifs, les francs-maçons, les protestants et les métèques (étrangers), qui tous font passer leurs solidarités propres avant la Nation.
  • When Fear Is Substituted for Reason: European and Western Government Policies Regarding National Security 1789-1919

    When Fear Is Substituted for Reason: European and Western Government Policies Regarding National Security 1789-1919

    WHEN FEAR IS SUBSTITUTED FOR REASON: EUROPEAN AND WESTERN GOVERNMENT POLICIES REGARDING NATIONAL SECURITY 1789-1919 Norma Lisa Flores A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2012 Committee: Dr. Beth Griech-Polelle, Advisor Dr. Mark Simon Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Michael Brooks Dr. Geoff Howes Dr. Michael Jakobson © 2012 Norma Lisa Flores All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Beth Griech-Polelle, Advisor Although the twentieth century is perceived as the era of international wars and revolutions, the basis of these proceedings are actually rooted in the events of the nineteenth century. When anything that challenged the authority of the state – concepts based on enlightenment, immigration, or socialism – were deemed to be a threat to the status quo and immediately eliminated by way of legal restrictions. Once the façade of the Old World was completely severed following the Great War, nations in Europe and throughout the West started to revive various nineteenth century laws in an attempt to suppress the outbreak of radicalism that preceded the 1919 revolutions. What this dissertation offers is an extended understanding of how nineteenth century government policies toward radicalism fostered an environment of increased national security during Germany’s 1919 Spartacist Uprising and the 1919/1920 Palmer Raids in the United States. Using the French Revolution as a starting point, this study allows the reader the opportunity to put events like the 1848 revolutions, the rise of the First and Second Internationals, political fallouts, nineteenth century imperialism, nativism, Social Darwinism, and movements for self-government into a broader historical context.
  • Fonds Edouard Daladier. Vol. 2 (1919-1975)

    Fonds Edouard Daladier. Vol. 2 (1919-1975)

    Fonds Edouard Daladier. Vol. 2 (1919-1975) Inventaire analytique (496AP/28-496AP/67) Par la Fondation nationale des Sciences politiques Archives nationales (France) Pierrefitte-sur-Seine 1972 1 https://www.siv.archives-nationales.culture.gouv.fr/siv/IR/FRAN_IR_003669 Cet instrument de recherche a été encodé en 2010 par l'entreprise diadeis dans le cadre du chantier de dématérialisation des instruments de recherche des Archives Nationales sur la base d'une DTD conforme à la DTD EAD (encoded archival description) et créée par le service de dématérialisation des instruments de recherche des Archives Nationales 2 Archives nationales (France) Sommaire Fonds Edouard Daladier. Vol. 2 7 4 DA - PREMIERE PARTIE LA POLITIQUE DE DEFENSE NATIONALE La 10 préparation de la France à la guerre et les responsabilités de la défaite 1 - ARMEMENT ET POLITIQUE MILITAIRE. 10 I.1 L'armement de la France de 1919-1936. 10 I.2 Documents généraux sur l'effort d'armement de 1936 à 1940. 13 2 - RESULTATS : MATERIELS ET RAPPORT DE FORCE. 24 II.1 Situation générale des armements. Résultats de la mobilisation industrielle. 24 II.2 L'aviation. 26 II.3 Les chars. 31 II.4 Autres matériels. 35 II.5 Armements étrangers. 37 II.6 Rapport des forces et plans d'opérations militaires. 40 II.7 Les causes de la défaites. 41 4 DA - DEUXIEME PARTIE LE PROCES 43 1 - DEROULEMENT DU PROCES 43 I.1 - Organisation générale 44 I.2 - Stenographie des audiences 44 I.3 - Le réquisitoire - Texte du réquisitoire : imprimé ; "Le Procès de Riom. 46 Réquisitoire de M. le Procureur général devant la Cour Suprême de ..
  • Vichy France and the Jews

    Vichy France and the Jews

    VICHY FRANCE AND THE JEWS MICHAEL R. MARRUS AND ROBERT 0. PAXTON Originally published as Vichy et les juifs by Calmann-Levy 1981 Basic Books, Inc., Publishers New York Contents Introduction Chapter 1 / First Steps Chapter 2 / The Roots o f Vichy Antisemitism Traditional Images of the Jews 27 Second Wave: The Crises of the 1930s and the Revival of Antisemitism 34 The Reach of Antisemitism: How Influential Was It? 45 The Administrative Response 54 The Refugee Crisis, 1938-41 58 Chapter 3 / The Strategy o f Xavier Vallat, i 9 4 !-4 2 The Beginnings of German Pressure 77 Vichy Defines the Jewish Issue, 1941 83 Vallat: An Activist at Work 96 The Emigration Deadlock 112 Vallat’s Fall 115 Chapter 4 / The System at Work, 1040-42 The CGQJ and Other State Agencies: Rivalries and Border Disputes 128 Business as Usual 144 Aryanization 152 Emigration 161 The Camps 165 Chapter 5 / Public Opinion, 1040-42 The Climax of Popular Antisemitism 181 The DistriBution of Popular Antisemitism 186 A Special Case: Algeria 191 The Churches and the Jews 197 X C ontents The Opposition 203 An Indifferent Majority 209 Chapter 6 / The Turning Point: Summer 1Q42 215 New Men, New Measures 218 The Final Solution 220 Laval and the Final Solution 228 The Effort to Segregate: The Jewish Star 234 Preparing the Deportation 241 The Vel d’Hiv Roundup 250 Drancy 252 Roundups in the Unoccupied Zone 255 The Massacre of the Innocents 263 The Turn in PuBlic Opinion 270 Chapter 7 / The Darquier Period, 1942-44 281 Darquier’s CGQJ and Its Place in the Regime 286 Darquier’s CGQJ in Action 294 Total Occupation and the Resumption of Deportations 302 Vichy, the ABBé Catry, and the Massada Zionists 310 The Italian Interlude 315 Denaturalization, August 1943: Laval’s Refusal 321 Last Days 329 Chapter 8 / Conclusions: The Holocaust in France .
  • The Historical Origins of Antisemitism

    The Historical Origins of Antisemitism

    THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF ANTISEMITISM …Let me give you my honest advice. First, their synagogues or churches should be set on fire, and whatever does not burn up should be covered or spread over so that no one may ever be able to see a cinder of it. And this ought to be done for the honor of God and Christianity… (Martin Luther, 1543) When Wilhelm Marr, a 19th Century German journalist, coined the term antisemitism, he was giving a new expression to a very old hatred. Antisemitism, the hatred of Jews and Judaism, has roots of ancient origin, pre-dating the Christian era and evolving throughout the Middle Ages into the modern era. Throughout their history, Jews have been the victims of a persistent pattern of persecution, culminating finally in the 20th Century in mass murder. The term denoting hatred of the Jews – antisemitism – is spelled here and hereafter unhyphenated and in the lower case. This spelling is more historically and etymologically correct since “Semitic” refers not to a race of people, as Marr and other racists of his time wrongly believed, but to a group of languages which includes Arabic as well as Hebrew. Hence, the oft-used spelling “anti-Semitism” means, literally, a prejudice against Semitic-speaking people, not the hatred of people adhering to the Jewish religion and culture. ANTISEMITISM DURING THE PRE-CHRISTIAN ERA Expressions of anti-Jewish prejudice appeared as early as the 4th Century B.C.E. in Greece and Egypt, whose people drew stark distinction between themselves and others, whom they regarded as “strangers,” “foreigners,” or “barbarians.” Jewish religious practice, based as it was on an uncompromising monotheism and strict adherence to their religious laws and social customs, only heightened endemic suspicions and excited hostility in societies already prone to ethnocentric excess.
  • LE PASSANT DU MATIN © 1989, Éditions Jean-Claude Lattès JEAN-LUC GENDRY

    LE PASSANT DU MATIN © 1989, Éditions Jean-Claude Lattès JEAN-LUC GENDRY

    LE PASSANT DU MATIN © 1989, éditions Jean-Claude Lattès JEAN-LUC GENDRY LE PASSANT DU MATIN CHAPITRE 1 Le lieutenant lui avait dit : « Si votre moto ne peut pas sui- vre, on ne pourra pas vous attendre. Le peloton n'a plus les moyens de traîner. » Depuis deux jours, il traînait en queue de peloton, avec des ratés interminables, des soubresauts, des reprises inattendues qui lui donnaient un fol espoir. Les autres rigolaient sous leurs lunettes et leurs casques. Cette amitié née sous les bombes des stukas et les balles traçantes des mitrail- leuses, cette fraternité des vingt-six hommes au combat, dans la poussière des routes, l'odeur chaude des champs de blé, la fraîcheur des nuits à la belle étoile se dissolvaient bêtement sous l'ironie facile de ceux dont les machines tournaient rond. Il n'y a rien à faire avec les Français, la rigolade leur tient lieu d'habillage. Ils font les mariolles. La plus grande déroute de leur histoire. La plus fantastique défaite jamais subie par une armée, donnée encore un mois plus tôt pour la première du monde. Et ils rient encore. Pour la première fois depuis un an, il les détesta et se détesta de les critiquer. Son moteur ne mar- chait plus que sur trois pattes. L'écart sur les derniers s'agran- dissait à vue d'œil. Ils lui avaient dit : « Tu nous rejoindras au prochain cantonnement. Direction Saumur, Bordeaux, Saint- Jean-de-Luz. » Ils auraient aussi bien dit : Périgueux, Cahors et Montauban. Qu'est-ce qu'ils en savaient ? Il n'y avait plus d'ordres.
  • LE RASSEMBLEMENT DES GAUCHES REPUBLICAINES ET SES COMPOSANTES Article Extrait De La Revue Recherches Contemporaines, N° 5, 1998-1999

    LE RASSEMBLEMENT DES GAUCHES REPUBLICAINES ET SES COMPOSANTES Article Extrait De La Revue Recherches Contemporaines, N° 5, 1998-1999

    LE RASSEMBLEMENT DES GAUCHES REPUBLICAINES ET SES COMPOSANTES Article extrait de la revue Recherches contemporaines, n° 5, 1998-1999 Le Rassemblement comme rassemblement Éric DUHAMEL De toutes les formations politiques, le RGR est probablement celle qui a le moins retenu l’attention des historiens. Les histoires générales de la 4e République se contentent de le qualifier de cartel électoral quand il n’est pas purement et simplement assimilé au Parti radical1. Or, le RGR, sans avoir été un parti politique stricto sensu, a été beaucoup plus qu’un cartel électoral ; en fait une confédération de forces politiques comparable à l’UDF. Mais si l’UDF, à l’origine cartel électoral, s’est transformée en "groupement politique"2, le RGR, ainsi que nous le verrons, a été pensé d’emblée comme une formule originale de regroupement de forces politiques. A ce titre, le RGR a joué un rôle et remplit une fonction non négligeable durant la 4e République. En outre, il constitue un type d’organisation dont la connaissance peut utilement enrichir les études sur les associations partisanes. Le lecteur ne trouvera pas dans les lignes qui suivent une étude exhaustive de cette formation mais, à l’occasion de la publication des notes politiques de Pierre de Léotard dans ce numéro de Recherches contemporaines, une brève présentation. L’histoire du RGR est celle de ses paradoxes. Le moindre n’a-t-il pas été de voir associés dans une même formation radicaux et manifestants du 6 février 1934, survivants de Vichy et résistants parmi les plus authentiques ? Que ce Rassemblement ait eu une influence certaine au Parlement, quand bien même ses principales composantes sont sorties discréditées de la seconde guerre mondiale, à l’exception 1.