DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Fall Plant Sale List Web Version.Xlsx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Fall Plant Sale List Web Version.Xlsx Mojave Desert Land Trust Fall 2019 Native Plant Sale Plant List Botanical Name Common Name Price All prices are plus tax 1-gallon/tall pots Achillea millefolium Common yarrow $5 Ambrosia salsola Cheesebush $5 Larrea tridentata Creosote bush $5 Acamptopappus sphaerocephalus Goldenhead $12 Atriplex canescens Four wing salt bush $12 Atriplex polycarpa Shadscale $12 Baccharis sergiloides Desert baccharis $12 Brickellia incana Wooly brickellbush $12 Cercocarpus betuloides Mountain mahogany $12 Cylindropuntia echinocarpa Silver cholla $12 Cylindropuntia ramossisima Pencil cholla $12 Diplacus (Mimulus) longiflorus Sticky monkeyflower $12 Encelia actoni Acton's encelia $12 Encelia frutescens Rayless encelia $12 Ericameria cuneata Cliff goldenbush $12 Ericameria linearifolia Linear leaf goldenbush $12 Ericameria teretifolia Green rabbitbrush $12 Eriogonum fasciculatum var. polifolium East Mojave buckwheat $12 Eriophyllum confertiflorum Golden yarrow $12 Forestiera pubescens Desert olive $12 Grayia spinosa Spiny hopsage $12 Heliotropium curassavicum Salt heliotrope $12 Juncus xiphioides Iris leaved rush $12 Lepidospartum squamatum Scalebroom $12 Mirabilis laevis var. crassifolia California four o'clock $12 Mirabilis multiflora Desert four o'clock $12 Nicotiana obtusifolia Coyote tobacco $12 Nicolettia occidentalis Hole-in-the-sand plant $12 Parkinsonia florida Blue palo verde $12 Penstemon eatonii Firecracker penstemon $12 Peritoma arborea Bladderpod $12 Prunus fasciculata Desert almond $12 Prunus ilicifolia Holly leaf cherry $12 Rhus ovata Sugarbush $12 Salvia apiana White sage $12 Salvia mellifera Black sage $12 Scutellaria mexicana Paper bag bush $12 Senna armata Desert senna $12 Simmondsia chinensis Jojoba $12 Sphaeralcea ambigua Apricot mallow $12 Stipa speciosa Desert needlegrass $12 Tetradymia stenolepis Mojave cottonthorn $12 Verbena gooddingii Goodding's verbena $12 Washingtonia filifera California fan palm $12 Xylorhiza tortifolia Mojave aster $12 Asclepias erosa Desert milkweed $15 Chilopsis linearis Desert willow $15 Opuntia basilaris Beavertail $15 Prosopis glandulosa Honey mesquite $15 Mojave Desert Land Trust Fall 2019 Native Plant Sale Plant List Botanical Name Common Name Price Prosopis pubescens Screwbean mesquite $15 Psorothamnus arborescens Indigo bush $15 Psorothamnus schottii Schott's indigo bush $15 Psorothamnus spinosus Smoketree $15 Quercus cornelius-mulleri Muller's scrub oak $15 Salvia mohavensis Mojave sage $15 Salvia pachyphylla Mountain sage $15 Thamnosma montana Turpentine broom $15 5-gallon pots Atriplex polycarpa Shadscale $25 Bahiopsis parishii Parish's goldeneye $25 Brickellia incana Wooly brickellia $25 Cercocarpus betuloides Mountain mahogany $40 Chilopsis linearis Desert willow $40 Forestiera pubescens Desert olive $40 Parkinsonia florida Palo verde $40 Peritoma arborea Bladderpod $40 Prosopis glandulosa Honey mesquite $40 Prosopis pubescens Screwbean mesquite $40 Prunus fasciculata Desert almond $40 Prunus ilicifolia Holly leaf cherry $40 Scutellaria mexicana Paper bag bush $40 Senegalia (Acacia) greggii Catclaw $40 Senna armata Desert senna $40 Simmondsia chinensis Jojoba $40 Sphaeralcea ambigua Desert globemallow $40 Washingtonia filifera California fan palm $40 Quercus cornelius-mulleri Muller's scrub oak $50 Yucca brevifolia Joshua tree $65 15-gallon pots Forestiera pubescens Desert olive $120 Parkinsonia florida Palo verde $120 Prunus ilicifolia Holly leaf cherry $120 Prosopis glandulosa Honey mesquite $150 Prosopis pubescens Screwbean mesquite $150 Prunus fasciculata Desert almond $150 Simmondsia chinensis Jojoba $150.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Géneros De Lamiaceae De México, Diversidad Y Endemismo
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Martínez-Gordillo, Martha; Fragoso-Martínez, Itzi; García-Peña, María del Rosario; Montiel, Oscar Géneros de Lamiaceae de México, diversidad y endemismo Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 84, núm. 1, marzo, 2013, pp. 30-86 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42526150034 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84: 30-86, 2013 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.30158 Géneros de Lamiaceae de México, diversidad y endemismo Genera of Lamiaceae from Mexico, diversity and endemism Martha Martínez-Gordillo1, Itzi Fragoso-Martínez1, María del Rosario García-Peña2 y Oscar Montiel1 1Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. partado postal 70-399, 04510 México, D.F., México. 2Herbario Nacional de México, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 70-367, 04510 México, D.F., México. [email protected] Resumen. La familia Lamiaceae es muy diversa en México y se distribuye con preferencia en las zonas templadas, aunque es posible encontrar géneros como Hyptis y Asterohyptis, que habitan en zonas secas y calientes; es una de las familias más diversas en el país, de la cual no se tenían datos actualizados sobre su diversidad y endemismo.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua Tree Species Status Assessment
    U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE Joshua Tree Species Status Assessment Felicia Sirchia, Scott Hoffmann, and Jennifer Wilkening 10/23/2018 Acknowledgements First and foremost, we would like to thank Tony Mckinney, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (CFWO) GIS Manager. Tony acquired and summarized data and generated maps for the Species Status Assessment (SSA) – information critical to development of the SSA. Thanks to our Core Team members Jennifer ‘Jena’ Lewinshon, Utah Fish and Wildlife Office, and Brian Wooldridge, Arizona Fish and Wildlife Office. Both these folks were involved early in the SSA development process and provided background on the SSA framework and constructive, helpful feedback on early drafts. Thanks to Bradd Bridges, CFWO Listing and Recovery Chief, and Jenness McBride, Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office Division Chief, who provided thorough, helpful comments on early drafts. Thanks to the rest of the Core Team: Arnold Roessler, Region 8, Regional listing Lead; Nancy Ferguson, CFWO; Justin Shoemaker, Region 6; Cheryll Dobson, Region 8 Solicitor; and Jane Hendron, CFWO Public Affairs. All these folks provided constructive, thoughtful comments on drafts of the SSA. Last but not least, we want to thank Wayne Nuckols, CFWO librarian, who provided invaluable research and reference support. Recommended Citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Joshua Tree Status Assessment. Dated October 23, 2018. 113 pp. + Appendices A–C. i Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Psorothamnus Arborescens Var. Pubescens (Parish) Barneby Marble Canyon Dalea
    TOC Page | 117 Psorothamnus arborescens var. pubescens (Parish) Barneby Marble Canyon Dalea Family: Fabaceae Synonyms: None NESL Status: G4 Federal Status: None Plant Description: Armed shrubs 4-10 dm tall; leaves 1.4-3.8cm long, leaflets 7-15, glandular beneath, strigose on both sides. Racemes 11-21 flowered, 1.8-4.5cm long. Calyx 8-10mm long, the tube 3.8- 4.8mm long, 10-ribbed, villous, the teeth 3.6-5.2mm long, linear-lanceolate, as long as the tube; flowers 8.1-10.6 mm long, indigo; valves of pods with large, round, discrete yellowish or orange blister glands, pubescent between blister glands. Flowering and fruiting from May to June. Similar species: Differs consistently from P. fremontii only in the ornamentation of the pod. P. fremontii has small orange glands that are confluent lengthwise into crowded ridges towards the pod’s beak. P. arborescens has large round blister glands separated from one another by spaces as wide as their diameter. Habitat: On soils derived from the Moenkopi Formation in mixed desert shrub communities between 3400 – 4900ft Distribution: Endemic Northern Coconino County, AZ, in the vicinity of Marble Canyon. Navajo Nation Distribution: Currently only known from Navajo Springs area, south of Navajo Bridge. Potential Navajo Nation Distribution: Lee’s Backbone to Bitter Springs. Recommended Survey Period: Proper identification is only possible during the flowering and fruiting period in May and June. Recommended Avoidance: A 200 ft buffer zone is recommended to avoid disturbance; may be more or less depending on size and nature of the project. References: Arizona Rare Plant Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant and Rodent Communities of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument
    Plant and rodent communities of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Warren, Peter Lynd Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 16:51:51 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/566520 PLANT AND RODENT COMMUNITIES OF ORGAN PIPE CACTUS NATIONAL.MONUMENT by Peter Lynd Warren A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 9 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of re­ quirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judg­ ment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholar­ ship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Map Accuracy Assessment of the Proposed Tehachapi Pass High-Speed Rail Corridor Vegetation Map
    Vegetation Classification and Map Accuracy Assessment of the Proposed Tehachapi Pass High-Speed Rail Corridor Vegetation Map Kern County, California Prepared for the Strategic Growth Council by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program September 2015 ABSTRACT The Geographical Information Center (GIC) at California State University, Chico, completed a vegetation map of the Proposed Tehachapi Pass High-Speed Rail Corridor (HSRC), covering 199,493 acres. The project was funded by the Strategic Growth Council to support routing and mitigation planning for the high-speed rail system. The map was produced using heads-up digitizing based on 2012 National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery. The minimum mapping unit (MMU) is one acre for most vegetation types, with a smaller MMU for wetlands. Although the primary purpose of the map is to document vegetation communities, it provides additional structural data such as herbaceous, shrub, and tree cover, and information about the level of disturbance within the vegetation stand. This report describes the tasks performed by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (VegCAMP), specifically, the creation of a vegetation classification for the project area and the accuracy assessment of the map. The overall accuracy of the map exceeded the state standard of 80%. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this project was provided by the Strategic Growth Council, California Wildlife Conservation Board and
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of PLANTS ACCEPTABLE in UTILITY EASEMENT Guideline for Shallow Rooting Plants* *Some Neighborhoods May Have More Stringent Or Restricted Plant List
    LIST OF PLANTS ACCEPTABLE IN UTILITY EASEMENT Guideline for Shallow Rooting Plants* *Some Neighborhoods may have more stringent or restricted plant list. In those cases use plant that are on both this plant list and that required by the neighborhood. Botanical Name Common Name GROUNDCOVERS Acacia redolens Desert carpet trailing acacia 2’ by 15’ Aloe barbadensis Medicinal aloe 2” by 2” Aloe saponaria Tiger aloe 1” by 1” Ambrosia deltoidea Triangle leaf bur-sage 2” by 2 Ambrosia dumosa White bur-sage 2’ by 3’ Artemisia ludoviciana White sage 2’ by 4’ Asparagus densiflorus ‘Sprengeri” Sprenger asparagus 2’ by 4’ Baccharis spp. “Twin Peaks” Twin peaks coyote brush 2’ by 5’ Bulbine frutescens Bulbine 1’ by 2’ Convolvulus mauritanicus Ground morning glory 1’ by 2’ Dalea Capitata “Sierra Gold” Yellow flowered trailing dalea 8, by 3’ Dalea greggii Trailing indigo bush 2’ by 4’ Ericameria laricifolia Turpentine bush 2’ by 3’ Eriogonum fasciculatum California buckwheat 2’ by 2’ Eriogonum wrightii Buckwheat 2’ by 3’ Gazania rigens “Sun Gold” Gold gazania 1’ by 3’ Lantana spp. “New Gold” Yellow lantana “New Gold” 1’ by 3’ Oenothera berlandieri Mexican evening primrose 1’ by 4’ Oenothera caespitosa Tufted evening primrose 1’ by 2’ Oenothera stubbei Saltillo Primrose 1’ by 4’ Rosemarinus officinalis “Prostratus” Trailing rosemary 2’ by 6’ Salvia chamaedryoides Blue sage 2’ by 2’ Salvia coccinea Sage 2’ by 3’ Santolina chamaecyparissus Lavender cotton 2’ by 2’ Santolina virens Green santolina 2’ by 18” Turf (out of R.O.W. areas and less then 50% of total landscape area) Teucrium chamaedrys ‘Prostrata” Germander 1’ by 2’ Verbena peruviana Peruvian verbena 8” by 3’ Verbena rigida Sandpaper verbena 2’ by 3’ Zephyranthes candida Rain lily 1’ by 1’ Zinnia grandiflora Rocky mountain zinnia 6” by 1’ SHRUBS Abutilon palmeri Superstition mallow Aloysia spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitation of Yucca Brevifolia Recruitment by Mojave Desert Shrubs
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1998 Facilitation of Yucca brevifolia recruitment by Mojave Desert shrubs Steve B Brittingham University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Brittingham, Steve B, "Facilitation of Yucca brevifolia recruitment by Mojave Desert shrubs" (1998). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 950. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/ms22-zauw This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter free, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Propagation of Native Plants for Restoration Projects in the SW U.S
    Propagation of Native Plants for Restoration Projects in the Southwestern U.S. - Preliminary Investigations 1 David R. Dreesen2 and John T. Harrington3 Abstract-Seed treatments to enhance germination capacity of a variety of native tree. shrub. forb. and grass species are reported. Scarification methods including hot water immersion (HW). mechanical scarification (MS). tumble scarification (TS), proximal end cuts (PEC), and sodium hypochlorite (SH) have been tested: Psorothamnus fremontii (HW. TS). Ceanothus integerrimus (HW). Ceanothus sanguineus (HW). Rhus g/abra (HW). Pte/ea trifoliata (PEG of seed separated by size and color). Rubus strigosus (SH), Oryzopsis hymenoides (TS), Co/eogyne ramosissima (TS). and a variety of native woody and herbaceous perennial legume species (HW. TS. MS). Gibberellic acid treatments were examined to overcome endo-dormancy of A/nus tenuifo/ia. A. ob/ongifolia, Rubus strigosus, and Oryzopsis hymenoides. Vegetative propagation methods investigated include mound layering of Platanus wrightii, root propagation of Populus tremu/oides. and pole plantings of riparian understory species (Amorpha fruticosa, Baccharis glutinosa, Forestiera neomexicana. and Chilopsis Iinearis). INTRODUCTION pounded by the scarcity of propagu\es (seed or vegeta­ tive material) of some species or ecotypes. Restoration ofdisturbed lands in the southwestern U.S. has become a primary mission of many federal and Seed propagation ofnative species often requires state land management agencies and a regulatory growers to rely on information from closely related requirement for extractive industries. Frequently, horticultural species for seed treatment requirements. containerized or bare-root plant materials are used for While this information is useful, many species are reclamation activities following severe disturbance or produced by the horticulture industry because oftheir for introduction ofwoody plant species formerly present ease ofpropagation as well as other horticulturally on poorly managed lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Optimization of a Germination Assay and Long-Term Storage for Cannabis
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.19.999367; this version posted March 20, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Development and optimization of a germination assay and long-term storage for Cannabis sativa pollen Daniel Gaudet1, Narendra Singh Yadav1, Aleksei Sorokin1, Andrii Bilichak1,2, Igor Kovalchuk1* 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge T1K 3M4, Alberta, Canada 2Current address: Morden Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Morden, MB, Canada * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Pollen viability and storage is of great interest to cannabis breeders and researchers to maintain desirable germplasm for future use in breeding or for biotechnological and gene editing applications. Here, we report a simple and efficient cryopreservation method for long-term storage of Cannabis sativa pollen. Additionally, we have deciphered the bicellular nature of cannabis pollen using DAPI staining. We have also standardized a pollen germination assay to assess the viability of cannabis pollen, and found pollen collected from different principal growth stages exhibits different longevity. Finally, we developed a long-term storage method which includes pollen combination with baked whole wheat flower and desiccation under vacuum for cryopreservation. By using this method, we were able to maintain germination viability in liquid nitrogen after 4 months, suggesting potentially indefinite preservation of cannabis pollen. Keywords: Cannabis sativa, Pollen germination assay, Cryopreservation, Long-term storage, DAPI staining of germinated pollen, Vegetative nuclei, Sperm nuclei.
    [Show full text]