DOCSLIB.ORG

Joshua Tree Species Status Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joshua Tree Species Status Assessment U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE Joshua Tree Species Status Assessment Felicia Sirchia, Scott Hoffmann, and Jennifer Wilkening 10/23/2018 Acknowledgements First and foremost, we would like to thank Tony Mckinney, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (CFWO) GIS Manager. Tony acquired and summarized data and generated maps for the Species Status Assessment (SSA) – information critical to development of the SSA. Thanks to our Core Team members Jennifer ‘Jena’ Lewinshon, Utah Fish and Wildlife Office, and Brian Wooldridge, Arizona Fish and Wildlife Office. Both these folks were involved early in the SSA development process and provided background on the SSA framework and constructive, helpful feedback on early drafts. Thanks to Bradd Bridges, CFWO Listing and Recovery Chief, and Jenness McBride, Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office Division Chief, who provided thorough, helpful comments on early drafts. Thanks to the rest of the Core Team: Arnold Roessler, Region 8, Regional listing Lead; Nancy Ferguson, CFWO; Justin Shoemaker, Region 6; Cheryll Dobson, Region 8 Solicitor; and Jane Hendron, CFWO Public Affairs. All these folks provided constructive, thoughtful comments on drafts of the SSA. Last but not least, we want to thank Wayne Nuckols, CFWO librarian, who provided invaluable research and reference support. Recommended Citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Joshua Tree Status Assessment. Dated October 23, 2018. 113 pp. + Appendices A–C. i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................ i 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 3.0 SSA METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 4 Analytical Framework ............................................................................................................................... 4 4.0 BIOLOGICAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........................................................................................... 5 Taxonomy .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Species Description ................................................................................................................................... 6 Range and Distribution ............................................................................................................................. 8 Contemporary Distribution ................................................................................................................... 9 Habitat .................................................................................................................................................... 12 Populations ......................................................................................................................................... 17 Life History and Demographics ............................................................................................................... 22 5.0 SPECIES NEEDS ...................................................................................................................................... 28 Individual Needs...................................................................................................................................... 28 Population Needs .................................................................................................................................... 29 Species Needs: Representation and Redundancy .................................................................................. 31 Redundancy ........................................................................................................................................ 31 Representation.................................................................................................................................... 31 6.0 SPECIES STATUS – CURRENT CONDITION ............................................................................................. 32 Uncertainties ........................................................................................................................................... 32 Stressors Potentially Affecting the Current Condition of Yucca brevifolia and Yucca jaegeriana Populations ............................................................................................................................................. 33 Yucca brevifolia ....................................................................................................................................... 33 Altered Fire Regimes and Invasive Annual Grasses ............................................................................ 33 Climate Trends .................................................................................................................................... 37 Habitat Loss ......................................................................................................................................... 41 Herbivory............................................................................................................................................. 45 ii Overutilization ..................................................................................................................................... 46 Nitrogen Enrichment (Air Pollution) ................................................................................................... 46 Yucca jaegeriana ..................................................................................................................................... 46 Altered Fire Regimes and Invasive Annual Grasses ............................................................................ 46 Climate Trends .................................................................................................................................... 49 Habitat Loss ......................................................................................................................................... 53 Herbivory............................................................................................................................................. 54 Overutilization ..................................................................................................................................... 55 Nitrogen Enrichment (Air Pollution) ................................................................................................... 55 Populations – Current Condition, Resiliency .......................................................................................... 55 Yucca brevifolia ................................................................................................................................... 57 Yucca brevifolia Current condition...................................................................................................... 60 Yucca jaegeriana ................................................................................................................................. 61 Yucca jaegeriana Current Condition ................................................................................................... 65 7.0 FUTURE CONDITION .............................................................................................................................. 66 Future Trend Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 67 Potential Stressors and Future Effects on Yucca brevifolia Populations. ............................................... 68 Altered Fire Regimes and Invasive Annual Grasses ............................................................................ 68 Climate Trends .................................................................................................................................... 71 Climate Metrics ................................................................................................................................... 73 Future Scenarios – Climate Change .................................................................................................... 77 Habitat Loss ......................................................................................................................................... 77 Military Activities ................................................................................................................................ 82 Future Scenarios – Habitat Loss .......................................................................................................... 83 Possible Synergistic Effects ................................................................................................................. 83 Summary of Potential Future Conditions on Yucca brevifolia Population Resiliency ............................. 86 YUBR South ......................................................................................................................................... 86 YUBR North ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Habitat Selection of the Desert Night Lizard (Xantusia Vigilis) on Mojave Yucca (Yucca Schidigera) in the Mojave Desert, California
    Habitat selection of the desert night lizard (Xantusia vigilis) on Mojave yucca (Yucca schidigera) in the Mojave Desert, California Kirsten Boylan1, Robert Degen2, Carly Sanchez3, Krista Schmidt4, Chantal Sengsourinho5 University of California, San Diego1, University of California, Merced2, University of California, Santa Cruz3, University of California, Davis4 , University of California, San Diego5 ABSTRACT The Mojave Desert is a massive natural ecosystem that acts as a biodiversity hotspot for hundreds of different species. However, there has been little research into many of the organisms that comprise these ecosystems, one being the desert night lizard (Xantusia vigilis). Our study examined the relationship between the common X. vigilis and the Mojave yucca (Yucca schidigera). We investigated whether X. vigilis exhibits habitat preference for fallen Y. schidigera log microhabitats and what factors make certain log microhabitats more suitable for X. vigilis inhabitation. We found that X. vigilis preferred Y. schidigera logs that were larger in circumference and showed no preference for dead or live clonal stands of Y. schidigera. When invertebrates were present, X. vigilis was approximately 50% more likely to also be present. These results suggest that X. vigilis have preferences for different types of Y. schidigera logs and logs where invertebrates are present. These findings are important as they help in understanding one of the Mojave Desert’s most abundant reptile species and the ecosystems of the Mojave Desert as a whole. INTRODUCTION such as the Mojave Desert in California. Habitat selection is an important The Mojave Desert has extreme factor in the shaping of an ecosystem. temperature fluctuations, ranging from Where an animal chooses to live and below freezing to over 134.6 degrees forage can affect distributions of plants, Fahrenheit (Schoenherr 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of PLANTS ACCEPTABLE in UTILITY EASEMENT Guideline for Shallow Rooting Plants* *Some Neighborhoods May Have More Stringent Or Restricted Plant List
    LIST OF PLANTS ACCEPTABLE IN UTILITY EASEMENT Guideline for Shallow Rooting Plants* *Some Neighborhoods may have more stringent or restricted plant list. In those cases use plant that are on both this plant list and that required by the neighborhood. Botanical Name Common Name GROUNDCOVERS Acacia redolens Desert carpet trailing acacia 2’ by 15’ Aloe barbadensis Medicinal aloe 2” by 2” Aloe saponaria Tiger aloe 1” by 1” Ambrosia deltoidea Triangle leaf bur-sage 2” by 2 Ambrosia dumosa White bur-sage 2’ by 3’ Artemisia ludoviciana White sage 2’ by 4’ Asparagus densiflorus ‘Sprengeri” Sprenger asparagus 2’ by 4’ Baccharis spp. “Twin Peaks” Twin peaks coyote brush 2’ by 5’ Bulbine frutescens Bulbine 1’ by 2’ Convolvulus mauritanicus Ground morning glory 1’ by 2’ Dalea Capitata “Sierra Gold” Yellow flowered trailing dalea 8, by 3’ Dalea greggii Trailing indigo bush 2’ by 4’ Ericameria laricifolia Turpentine bush 2’ by 3’ Eriogonum fasciculatum California buckwheat 2’ by 2’ Eriogonum wrightii Buckwheat 2’ by 3’ Gazania rigens “Sun Gold” Gold gazania 1’ by 3’ Lantana spp. “New Gold” Yellow lantana “New Gold” 1’ by 3’ Oenothera berlandieri Mexican evening primrose 1’ by 4’ Oenothera caespitosa Tufted evening primrose 1’ by 2’ Oenothera stubbei Saltillo Primrose 1’ by 4’ Rosemarinus officinalis “Prostratus” Trailing rosemary 2’ by 6’ Salvia chamaedryoides Blue sage 2’ by 2’ Salvia coccinea Sage 2’ by 3’ Santolina chamaecyparissus Lavender cotton 2’ by 2’ Santolina virens Green santolina 2’ by 18” Turf (out of R.O.W. areas and less then 50% of total landscape area) Teucrium chamaedrys ‘Prostrata” Germander 1’ by 2’ Verbena peruviana Peruvian verbena 8” by 3’ Verbena rigida Sandpaper verbena 2’ by 3’ Zephyranthes candida Rain lily 1’ by 1’ Zinnia grandiflora Rocky mountain zinnia 6” by 1’ SHRUBS Abutilon palmeri Superstition mallow Aloysia spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitation of Yucca Brevifolia Recruitment by Mojave Desert Shrubs
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1998 Facilitation of Yucca brevifolia recruitment by Mojave Desert shrubs Steve B Brittingham University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Brittingham, Steve B, "Facilitation of Yucca brevifolia recruitment by Mojave Desert shrubs" (1998). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 950. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/ms22-zauw This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter free, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of a Petition from the Center for Biological
    State of California Natural Resources Agency Department of Fish and Wildlife REPORT TO THE FISH AND GAME COMMISSION EVALUATION OF A PETITION FROM THE CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY TO LIST WESTERN JOSHUA TREE (YUCCA BREVIFOLIA) AS THREATENED UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Photo of Yucca brevifolia by Jeb McKay Bjerke Prepared by California Department of Fish and Wildlife February 2020 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................... 2 II. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 3 A. Candidacy Evaluation ........................................................................................... 3 B. Petition History ..................................................................................................... 5 C. Overview of Western Joshua Tree Ecology .......................................................... 6 III. SUFFICIENCY OF SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION TO INDICATE THE PETITIONED ACTION FOR WESTERN JOSHUA TREE MAY BE WARRANTED ............................................................................................................................. 7 A. Population Trend .................................................................................................. 8 B. Geographic Range ............................................................................................... 9 C. Distribution.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua Tree Yucca Brevifolia
    • Common Names Taxonomy – Joshua Tree Kingdom Plantae Yucca Palm plants – Subkingdom Tracheobionta vascular plants – Tree Yucca Division Magnoliophyta angiosperms, flowering plants – Palm Tree Yucca Class Liliopsida monocotyledons – Izote de desierto Subclass Liliidae Order Asparagales Family Asparagaceae Genus Yucca L. • Varieties – Y.b. var. brevifolia Engelm. – Y.b. var. jaegeriana McKelvey Habitat • Southwestern US – Mojave Desert Indicator Species – Between 1,300 and 5,900 ft • Dense Forests – Joshua Tree National Park Hardiness Zones: – Mojave National UDSA – 6-10 Preserve Sunset – 8-24 Characteristics • Grows up to 45 ft. tall – 3 in./yr. (first 10 years), then 1.5 in./yr. • Roots up to 36 ft. from trunk • Fibrous trunk with top-heavy branching • Live up to 1000 years • Leaves – Evergreen, linear, bayonet-shaped – 15-35 cm long, 7-15 wide at base – Sharp tips and white serrate margins – Form dense spirals at ends of stems • Flowers – White and borne on panicles. – Pollinated by Yucca Moth – Dependent on rainfall; need winter freeze • Fruit – Semi-fleshy – Elliptical – Green-brown Threats? • Agave Weevil? • Humans? • Root rot? Uses? • Xeroscaping • Specimen Plant • Food (seeds, flowers) • Sandals • Baskets • Red dye Why I Like the Joshua Tree Sources • http://geotripper.blogspot.com/2010/12/last-christmas-gift-joshua-tree.html • http://www.panoramio.com/photo/1994976 • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yucca_brevifolia • http://www.sciencephoto.com/media/34337/enlarge • http://dragonflyseye.blogspot.com/2010/04/joshua-trees-in-bloom.html
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Plant Resources in the Yucca Mountain Area, Nevada, Interim Report
    v6 -DOEINV-10576-19 DOFINV-10576-19 _ I- DOE/NV-1O576-19 DOEINv-1 0576-19 tNERGY YUCCA MOUNTAIN 'UxC PROJECT NATIVE AMERICAN PLANT RESOURCES IN THE YUCCA MOUNTAIN AREA, NEVADA INTERIM REPORT NOVEMBER 1989 Ci WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT NO. DE-AC0887NV10576 Technical & Management Support Services SCIENCE APPLICATIONS. INTERNATIONAL CORPORATiON I / 9007020264 :91130 k kPII PDR WASTE gflo31 WM-11 FDIC DOEINV-10576-1 9 DOE/NV-1 0576-1 9 YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT NATIVE AMERICAN PLANT RESOURCES IN THE YUCCA MOUNTAIN AREA, NEVADA Interim Report November 1989 by Richard W. Stoffle Michael J. Evans David B. Halmo Institute for Social Research University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan and Wesley E. Niles Joan T. O'Farrell EG&G Energy Measurements, Inc. Goleta, California Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office under Contract No. DE-ACO8.B7NV10576 by Science Applications International Corporation Las Vegas, Nevada DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its en- dorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The view and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or re- flect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Ruteae (Rutaceae): New Evidence from the Chloroplast Genome and Comparisons with Non-Molecular Data
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution xxx (2008) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogenetic relationships of Ruteae (Rutaceae): New evidence from the chloroplast genome and comparisons with non-molecular data Gabriele Salvo a,*, Gianluigi Bacchetta b, Farrokh Ghahremaninejad c, Elena Conti a a Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zürich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland b Center for Conservation of Biodiversity (CCB), Department of Botany, University of Cagliari, Viale S. Ignazio da Laconi 13, 09123 Cagliari, Italy c Department of Biology, Tarbiat Moallem University, 49 Dr. Mofatteh Avenue, 15614 Tehran, Iran article info abstract Article history: Phylogenetic analyses of three cpDNA markers (matK, rpl16, and trnL–trnF) were performed to evaluate Received 12 December 2007 previous treatments of Ruteae based on morphology and phytochemistry that contradicted each other, Revised 14 July 2008 especially regarding the taxonomic status of Haplophyllum and Dictamnus. Trees derived from morpho- Accepted 9 September 2008 logical, phytochemical, and molecular datasets of Ruteae were then compared to look for possible pat- Available online xxxx terns of agreement among them. Furthermore, non-molecular characters were mapped on the molecular phylogeny to identify uniquely derived states and patterns of homoplasy in the morphological Keywords: and phytochemical datasets. The phylogenetic analyses determined that Haplophyllum and Ruta form Ruta reciprocally exclusive monophyletic groups and that Dictamnus is not closely related to the other genera Citrus family Morphology of Ruteae. The different types of datasets were partly incongruent with each other. The discordant phy- Phytochemistry logenetic patterns between the phytochemical and molecular trees might be best explained in terms of Congruence convergence in secondary chemical compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List
    Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment.
    [Show full text]
  • Mojave Desert Network Integrated Upland Monitoring 2012 Pilot Study for Joshua Tree National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Mojave Desert Network Integrated Upland Monitoring 2012 Pilot Study for Joshua Tree National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/MOJN/NRTR—2014/850 ON THE COVER Joshua tree wooded alliance monitoring plot, Joshua Tree National Park Photograph by: Photograph by: Jean J. Pan, NPS Mojave Desert Network Integrated Upland Monitoring 2012 Pilot Study for Joshua Tree National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/MOJN/NRTR—2014/850 Jean J. Pan, Ph.D., Nita Tallent, Ph.D. National Park Service Mojave Desert Network 601 Nevada Highway, Boulder City, NV 89005 March 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List the Western Joshua Tree Under the California Endangered Species
    BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME COMMISSION A Petition to List the Western Joshua Tree (Yucca brevifolia) as Threatened under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Center for Biological Diversity October 15, 2019 i Notice of Petition For action pursuant to Section 670.1, Title 14, California Code of Regulations (CCR) and Division 3, Chapter 1.5, Article 2 of the California Fish and Game Code (Sections 2070 et seq.) relating to listing and delisting endangered and threatened species of plants and animals. I. SPECIES BEING PETITIONED: Species Name: Western Joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia) as either a full species, or as the subspecies Yucca brevifolia brevifolia. II. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Listing as Threatened The Center for Biological Diversity submits this petition to list the western Joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia) as Threatened pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act (California Fish and Game Code §§ 2050 et seq., “CESA”). The western Joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia), long recognized as a subspecies or variety (Yucca brevifolia brevifolia), has recently been recognized as a full species distinct from its close relative, the eastern Joshua tree (Yucca jaegeriana). This petition demonstrates that the western Joshua tree is eligible for and warrants listing under CESA based on the factors specified in the statute and implementing regulations. Specifically, the western Joshua tree meets the definition of a “threatened species” since it is “a native species or subspecies of a … plant that, although not presently threatened with extinction, is likely to become an endangered species in the foreseeable future in the absence of the special protection and management efforts . .” Cal.
    [Show full text]
  • TAXON:Yucca Gloriosa L. SCORE:11.0 RATING:High Risk
    TAXON: Yucca gloriosa L. SCORE: 11.0 RATING: High Risk Taxon: Yucca gloriosa L. Family: Asparagaceae Common Name(s): palmlilja Synonym(s): Yucca acuminata Sweet Spanish dagger Yucca acutifolia Truff. Yucca ellacombei Baker Yucca ensifolia Groenl. Yucca integerrima Stokes Yucca obliqua Haw. Yucca patens André Yucca plicata (Carrière) K.Koch Yucca plicatilis K.Koch Yucca pruinosa Baker Yucca tortulata Baker Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 15 Nov 2017 WRA Score: 11.0 Designation: H(HPWRA) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Naturalized, Weedy Succulent, Spine-tipped Leaves, Moth-pollinated Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) Intermediate tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 y Creation Date: 15 Nov 2017 (Yucca gloriosa L.) Page 1 of 21 TAXON: Yucca gloriosa L.
    [Show full text]
  • Yucca: a Medicinally Significant Genus with Manifold Therapeutic Attributes
    Review Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2012, 2, 231–234 DOI 10.1007/s13659-012-0090-4 Yucca: A medicinally significant genus with manifold therapeutic attributes Seema PATEL* Better Process Control School, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California Davis, California, United States Received 9 November 2012; Accepted 20 November 2012 © The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract: The genus Yucca comprising of several species is dominant across the chaparrals, canyons and deserts of American South West and Mexico. This genus has long been a source of sustenance and drugs for the Native Americans. In the wake of revived interest in drug discovery from plant sources, this genus has been investigated and startling nutritive and therapeutic capacities have come forth. Apart from the functional food potential, antioxidant, antiinflammation, antiarthritic, anticancer, antidiabetic, antimicrobial, and hypocholesterolaemic properties have also been revealed. Steroidal saponins, resveratrol and yuccaols have been identified to be the active principles with myriad biological actions. To stimulate further research on this genus of multiple food and pharmaceutical uses, this updated review has been prepared with references extracted from MEDLINE database. Keywords: Yucca, saponin, antioxidant, cytotoxicity, antimicrobial Introduction filamentosa as medicines and soap. The roots were crushed to The genus Yucca belongs to Asparagaceae family and make poultice for wound healing. Further, the roots were used encompasses about 40–50 medicinally potent plants. These to cure gonorrhoea and rheumatism. The Zuni tribe inhabiting flowering plants generally thrive in arid parts of Southwestern the western New Mexico region used Yucca elata sap as hair US and Mexico, namely Mojave, Sonoran, Colorado and growth stimulant.
    [Show full text]