DOCSLIB.ORG

Chickasaw National Recreation Area Paleontological Resources Inventory (Public Version)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chickasaw National Recreation Area Paleontological Resources Inventory (Public Version) National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Chickasaw National Recreation Area Paleontological Resources Inventory (Public Version) Natural Resource Report NPS/CHIC/NRR—2016/1276 ON THE COVER Echinoderm stalk and columnals collected from the Welling Formation at the “Veterans Lake” echinoderm locality. Photo taken by Roger Burkhalter at the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History at 2X magnification. Chickasaw National Recreation Area Paleontological Resources Inventory (Public Version) Natural Resource Report NPS/CHIC/NRR—2016/1276 Alysia S. Korn National Park Service Geoscientists-in-the-Parks Program Chickasaw National Recreation Area [email protected] Madison L. Armstrong National Park Service Geoscientists-in-the-Parks Program Chickasaw National Recreation Area [email protected] Vincent L. Santucci National Park Service Geologic Resources Division 1201 Eye Street, NW (Room 1146) Washington, D.C. 20005 [email protected] Justin Tweet Tweet Paleo-Consulting 9149 79th St. S. Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 [email protected] August 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available in digital format from the Southern Plains Inventory and Monitoring Network website (http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/units/sopn), and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm/). To receive this report in a format optimized for screen readers, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Korn, A.S., M. L. Armstrong, V. L. Santucci, and J. Tweet. 2016. Chickasaw National Recreation Area paleontological resources inventory (Public Version). Natural Resource Report NPS/CHIC/NRR—2016/1276. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 107/133803, August 2016 ii Contents Page Figures.................................................................................................................................................. vii Tables ..................................................................................................................................................viii Appendices ..........................................................................................................................................viii Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. ix Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................. x Dedication ............................................................................................................................................. xi Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 History of CHIC ............................................................................................................................. 1 Importance of Paleontological Resources at CHIC ........................................................................ 2 Project Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 3 Geology .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Geologic History of the Arbuckle Mountains ................................................................................ 7 Rock Formations Exposed in CHIC ............................................................................................... 7 Simpson Group .......................................................................................................................... 7 Joins & Oil Creek formations .................................................................................................... 7 McLish, Tulip Creek & Bromide formations ............................................................................ 8 Viola Group ............................................................................................................................... 8 Sylvan Shale .............................................................................................................................. 9 Hunton Group ............................................................................................................................ 9 Cochrane Formation .................................................................................................................. 9 Clarita Formation..................................................................................................................... 10 Henryhouse Formation ............................................................................................................ 10 Haragan Formation .................................................................................................................. 10 Bois d’Arc Formation .............................................................................................................. 11 Woodford Shale ....................................................................................................................... 11 Sycamore Limestone ............................................................................................................... 12 Caney Shale ............................................................................................................................. 13 Deese Group ............................................................................................................................ 14 iii Contents (continued) Page Vanoss Formation .................................................................................................................... 14 Quaternary sediments .............................................................................................................. 15 Paleontological Resource Inventory .................................................................................................... 16 Fossil Protists ............................................................................................................................... 16 Kingdom Protista ..................................................................................................................... 16 Fossil Plants .................................................................................................................................. 16 Kingdom Plantae ..................................................................................................................... 16 Fossil Invertebrates ....................................................................................................................... 17 Kingdom Animalia .................................................................................................................. 17 Fossil Vertebrates ......................................................................................................................... 21 Kingdom Animalia .................................................................................................................. 21 Trace Fossils ................................................................................................................................. 21 CHIC Paleontological Resource Localities.......................................................................................... 22 Southern Boundary of CHIC ........................................................................................................ 22 CHIC PAL 001 ........................................................................................................................ 22 CHIC PAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Oseberg Project: in This Issue !Vikings in Memphis the Oseberg Project P
    MEMPHIS ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY MAGS Rockhound News ◊ A monthly newsletter for and by the members of MAGS Volume 63 ! Number 02 ! February 2017 ! A monthly newsletter for and by the members of MAGS The Oseberg Project: In this issue !Vikings in Memphis The Oseberg Project" P. 1 Rendy Hunt!!!!!February Program Countdown to Show" P. 1 MAGS And Federation Notes"" P. 2 President’s Message" P. 3 New Members"" P. 3 Membership Renewal Drawing Winner" P. 3 February Field Trip" P. 3 Can You Dig It?" P. 3 NASA Loves Lucy" P. 4 December Board Minutes"" P. 4 December Meeting Minutes"" P. 5 February Birthdays" P. 5 Fabulous Tennessee Fossils"" P. 6 A brief introduction and participates in the Society for Jewelry Bench Tips" P. 7 explanation of the Oseberg burial Creative Anachronism, (SCA) February 6 Deadline" P. 8 and the ongoing project to recre- which has led her on a journey Parsons Trip ate the burial grave goods using through History. Having Rescheduled" P. 8 materials sourced from Memphis researched the Vikings in depth, The Collision That and the surrounding areas. she is now embarking on a project Made the Moon" P. 8 to recreate the grave goods found Rendy Hunt is an Information Binomial Nomenclature P. 9 Systems Specialist from Memphis, in the Oseberg burial. Her research into this MAGS At A Glance" P. 10 Tennessee. In her spare time, she Continued, P.4 COUNTDOWN TO SHOW Memphis Mineral, Fossil, and Jewelry Show volunteer before, during, and at cleanup. The The Earth Wide Open only way we can put on such a large show is with your help.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion. Brachiopod Zonation and Age of the Permian Kapp Starostin Formation (Central Spitsbergen)
    Discussion. Brachiopod zonation and age of the Permian Kapp Starostin Formation (Central Spitsbergen) LARS STEMMERIK Stemmerik, L. 1988: Discussion. Brachiopod zonation and age of the Permian Kapp Starostin Formation (Central Spitsbergen). Polar Research 6, 179-180. Lars Stemmerik, Grgnlands Geologiske Unders~geke,0ster Voldgade 10, 0-1350KQbenhaun K, Denmark; May 1988. The following discussion will concentrate on the rhynchus kempei, and Muirwoodia greenlandica stratigraphical implications of the brachiopod for the Megousia weyprechti Zone and Ptero- zonation proposed by Nakamura et al. (1987). No spirifer alatus, Pleurohorridonia scoresbyensis, such brachiopod zonation can be recognised in Choristites s#derberghi, and Odontospirifer mir- Greenland where in contrast diagnostic species abilis for the Pterospirifer alatus Zone (Nakamura of the upper zones in the Kapp Starostin For- et al. 1987, p. 213). Furthermore, Liosotella spitz- mation co-occur throughout the entire section. bergiana, Paeckelmannia toulai and Kochi- It is therefore concluded that the correlations productus plexicostatus confined to the uppermost proposed by Nakamura et al. (1987) are not valid. zones in the Kapp Starostin Formation are found At best the overall similarities of the East Green- in East Greenland. land and Svalbard faunas may indicate a Kaz- The work of Dunbar (1955) does not imply a anian-early Tatarian age for the upper part of the two-fold zonation of the brachiopods in the Fold- Kapp Starostin Formation. vik Creek Group in East Greenland. As discussed The paper of Nakamura et al. (1987) has wide below the different collections described by Dun- stratigraphic implications both for local cor- bar (1955) include a mixture of species diagnostic relation of the Foldvik Creek Group (sensu for the Megousia weyprechti Zone, Pterospirifer Surlyk et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Diminutive Trilobite Flexicalymene Retrorsa Minuens from the Cincinnatian Series (Upper Ordovician), Cincinnati Region
    EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT 9:5, 483–498 (2007) Evaluating paedomorphic heterochrony in trilobites: the case of the diminutive trilobite Flexicalymene retrorsa minuens from the Cincinnatian Series (Upper Ordovician), Cincinnati region Brenda R. Hundaa,Ã and Nigel C. Hughesb aCincinnati Museum Center, 1301 Western Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45203, USA bDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA ÃAuthor for correspondence (email: [email protected]) SUMMARY Flexicalymene retrorsa minuens from the upper- rate of progress along a common ontogenetic trajectory with most 3 m of the Waynesville Formation of the Cincinnatian respect to size, coupled with growth cessation at a small size, Series (Upper Ordovician) of North America lived ‘‘sequential’’ progenesis, or non-uniform changes in the rate of approximately 445 Ma and exhibited marked reduction in progress along a shared ontogenetic trajectory with respect to maximum size relative to its stratigraphically subjacent sister size, can also be rejected. Rather, differences between these subspecies, Flexicalymene retrorsa retrorsa. Phylogenetic subspecies are more consistent with localized changes in analysis is consistent with the notion that F. retrorsa retrorsa rates of character development than with a global hetero- was the ancestor of F. retrorsa minuens. F. retrorsa minuens chronic modification of the ancestral ontogeny. The evolution has been claimed to differ from F. retrorsa retrorsa ‘‘in size of F. retrorsa minuens from F. retrorsa retrorsa was largely alone,’’ and thus presents a plausible example of global dominated by modifications of the development of characters paedomorphic evolution in trilobites. Despite strong similarity already evident in the ancestral ontogeny, not by the origin of in the overall form of the two subspecies, F.
    [Show full text]
  • BRAGEN LIST Established by Rex Doescher JAN 19,1996 13:38 GENUS AUTHOR DATE RANGE
    BRAGEN LIST established by Rex Doescher JAN 19,1996 13:38 GENUS AUTHOR DATE RANGE SUPERFAMILY: ACROTRETACEA ACROTHELE LINNARSSON 1876 CAMBRIAN ACROTHYRA MATTHEW 1901 CAMBRIAN AKMOLINA POPOV & HOLMER 1994 CAMBRIAN AMICTOCRACENS HENDERSON & MACKINNON 1981 CAMBRIAN ANABOLOTRETA ROWELL & HENDERSON 1978 CAMBRIAN ANATRETA MEI 1993 CAMBRIAN ANELOTRETA PELMAN 1986 CAMBRIAN ANGULOTRETA PALMER 1954 CAMBRIAN APHELOTRETA ROWELL 1980 CAMBRIAN APSOTRETA PALMER 1954 CAMBRIAN BATENEVOTRETA USHATINSKAIA 1992 CAMBRIAN BOTSFORDIA MATTHEW 1891 CAMBRIAN BOZSHAKOLIA USHATINSKAIA 1986 CAMBRIAN CANTHYLOTRETA ROWELL 1966 CAMBRIAN CERATRETA BELL 1941 1 Range BRAGEN LIST - 1996 CAMBRIAN CURTICIA WALCOTT 1905 CAMBRIAN DACTYLOTRETA ROWELL & HENDERSON 1978 CAMBRIAN DEARBORNIA WALCOTT 1908 CAMBRIAN DIANDONGIA RONG 1974 CAMBRIAN DICONDYLOTRETA MEI 1993 CAMBRIAN DISCINOLEPIS WAAGEN 1885 CAMBRIAN DISCINOPSIS MATTHEW 1892 CAMBRIAN EDREJA KONEVA 1979 CAMBRIAN EOSCAPHELASMA KONEVA & AL 1990 CAMBRIAN EOTHELE ROWELL 1980 CAMBRIAN ERBOTRETA HOLMER & USHATINSKAIA 1994 CAMBRIAN GALINELLA POPOV & HOLMER 1994 CAMBRIAN GLYPTACROTHELE TERMIER & TERMIER 1974 CAMBRIAN GLYPTIAS WALCOTT 1901 CAMBRIAN HADROTRETA ROWELL 1966 CAMBRIAN HOMOTRETA BELL 1941 CAMBRIAN KARATHELE KONEVA 1986 CAMBRIAN KLEITHRIATRETA ROBERTS 1990 CAMBRIAN 2 Range BRAGEN LIST - 1996 KOTUJOTRETA USHATINSKAIA 1994 CAMBRIAN KOTYLOTRETA KONEVA 1990 CAMBRIAN LAKHMINA OEHLERT 1887 CAMBRIAN LINNARSSONELLA WALCOTT 1902 CAMBRIAN LINNARSSONIA WALCOTT 1885 CAMBRIAN LONGIPEGMA POPOV & HOLMER 1994 CAMBRIAN LUHOTRETA MERGL & SLEHOFEROVA
    [Show full text]
  • Strophomenide and Orthotetide Silurian Brachiopods from the Baltic Region, with Particular Reference to Lithuanian Boreholes
    Strophomenide and orthotetide Silurian brachiopods from the Baltic region, with particular reference to Lithuanian boreholes PETRAS MUSTEIKIS and L. ROBIN M. COCKS Musteikis, P. and Cocks, L.R.M. 2004. Strophomenide and orthotetide Silurian brachiopods from the Baltic region, with particular reference to Lithuanian boreholes. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 49 (3): 455–482. Epeiric seas covered the east and west parts of the old craton of Baltica in the Silurian and brachiopods formed a major part of the benthic macrofauna throughout Silurian times (Llandovery to Pridoli). The orders Strophomenida and Orthotetida are conspicuous components of the brachiopod fauna, and thus the genera and species of the superfamilies Plec− tambonitoidea, Strophomenoidea, and Chilidiopsoidea, which occur in the Silurian of Baltica are reviewed and reidentified in turn, and their individual distributions are assessed within the numerous boreholes of the East Baltic, particularly Lithua− nia, and attributed to benthic assemblages. The commonest plectambonitoids are Eoplectodonta(Eoplectodonta)(6spe− cies), Leangella (2 species), and Jonesea (2 species); rarer forms include Aegiria and Eoplectodonta (Ygerodiscus), for which the new species E. (Y.) bella is erected from the Lithuanian Wenlock. Eight strophomenoid families occur; the rare Leptaenoideidae only in Gotland (Leptaenoidea, Liljevallia). Strophomenidae are represented by Katastrophomena (4 spe− cies), and Pentlandina (2 species); Bellimurina (Cyphomenoidea) is only from Oslo and Gotland. Rafinesquinidae include widespread Leptaena (at least 11 species) and Lepidoleptaena (2 species) with Scamnomena and Crassitestella known only from Gotland and Oslo. In the Amphistrophiidae Amphistrophia is widespread, and Eoamphistrophia, Eocymostrophia, and Mesodouvillina are rare. In the Leptostrophiidae Mesoleptostrophia, Brachyprion,andProtomegastrophia are com− mon, but Eomegastrophia, Eostropheodonta, Erinostrophia,andPalaeoleptostrophia are only recorded from the west in the Baltica Silurian.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLICATIONS by JAMES SPRINKLE 1965 -- Sprinkle, James
    PUBLICATIONS BY JAMES SPRINKLE 1965 -- Sprinkle, James. 1965. Stratigraphy and sedimentary petrology of the lower Lodgepole Formation of southwestern Montana. M.I.T. Department of Geology and Geophysics, unpublished Senior Thesis, 29 p. (see #56 and 66 below) 1966 1. Sprinkle, James and Gutschick, R. C. 1966. Blastoids from the Sappington Formation of southwest Montana (Abst.). Geological Society of America Special Paper 87:163-164. 1967 2. Sprinkle, James and Gutschick, R. C. 1967. Costatoblastus, a channel fill blastoid from the Sappington Formation of Montana. Journal of Paleon- tology, 41(2):385-402. 1968 3. Sprinkle, James. 1968. The "arms" of Caryocrinites, a Silurian rhombiferan cystoid (Abst.). Geological Society of America Special Paper 115:210. 1969 4. Sprinkle, James. 1969. The early evolution of crinozoan and blastozoan echinoderms (Abst.). Geological Society of America Special Paper 121:287-288. 5. Robison, R. A. and Sprinkle, James. 1969. A new echinoderm from the Middle Cambrian of Utah (Abst.). Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 1(5):69. 6. Robison, R. A. and Sprinkle, James. 1969. Ctenocystoidea: new class of primitive echinoderms. Science, 166(3912):1512-1514. 1970 -- Sprinkle, James. 1970. Morphology and Evolution of Blastozoan Echino- derms. Harvard University Department of Geological Sciences, unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, 433 p. (see #8 below) 1971 7. Sprinkle, James. 1971. Stratigraphic distribution of echinoderm plates in the Antelope Valley Limestone of Nevada and California. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 750-D (Geological Survey Research 1971):D89-D98. 1973 8. Sprinkle, James. 1973. Morphology and Evolution of Blastozoan Echino- derms. Harvard University, Museum of Comparative Zoology Special Publication, 283 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic Rocks Antelope Valley Eureka and Nye Counties Nevada
    :It k 'I! ' Paleozoic Rocks Antelope Valley Eureka and Nye Counties Nevada GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 423 Paleozoic Rocks of Antelope Valley Eureka and Nye Counties Nevada By CHARLES W. MERRIAM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 423 P,rinciples of stratigraphy applied in descriptive study of the Central Great Basin Paleozoic column UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Page Silurian system ____________________________________ _ Abstract------------------------------------------- 1 36 Introduction. _____________________________________ _ 2 General features-------------------------------- 36 Geologic setting ______________ ------ ___ --------- 2 Roberts Mountains formation ___________________ _ 37 History of investigation ________________________ _ 5 Lone Mountain dolomite ______ ---_-------------- 39 Purpose and scope _____________ -- ______ ------ --- 6 Devonian system ______________ ---- __ - _- ___ - _------- 41 Acknowledgments ______________________________ _ 6 General features _____________ - ___________ -_----- 41 Geologic structure as related to stratigraphy __________ _ 6 Western Helderberg age limestones of the Monitor Paleontologic studies ______ ..:. _______ ~ ________________ _ 9 · Range ______ - _.- ___ --------------------------- 42 The Paleozoic column at Antelope Valley
    [Show full text]
  • GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT H. Born
    R. H. Goldstein CURRICULUM VITAE Full Name: GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT H. Born: 22 November, 1957, Baltimore, Maryland. Education: Juniata College, B.S., 1979. University of Wisconsin, M.S., 1981. University of Wisconsin, Ph.D., 1986. ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS: 2011-present Associate Dean, Natural Sciences and Mathematics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Kansas 2000-present Distinguished Professor, Haas Professor of Geology, University of Kansas 2010-2011 Visiting Scientific Fellow, ConocoPhillips Technology 2009-2010 Faculty Fellow, Center of Teaching Excellence 2004-2009 Department Chair, University of Kansas 2006-2007 Co-Director, Energy Research Center 1996-2000 Full Professor, University of Kansas 1991 - 1996 Associate Professor with tenure, University of Kansas 1994 Acting Chairperson, Department of Geology, University of Kansas 1993 (sabbatical) Visiting faculty, SUNY Stony Brook 1992 (sabbatical) Visiting Scientist, USGS, Denver 1986 - 1991 Assistant Professor, University of Kansas 1985 - 1986 Acting Assistant Professor, University of Kansas 1982 - 1985 University of Wisconsin, Exxon Doctoral Fellow 1981 - 1982 University of Wisconsin, Conoco Research Contract 1980 - 1981 University of Wisconsin, Research Assistant 1979 - 1980 University of Wisconsin, Teaching Assistant 1977 - 1979 Juniata College, Laboratory Assistant AWARDS AND HONORS: 1 R. H. Goldstein University of Kansas SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology 2011 National Excellence Award for Poster SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology 2010 National Outstanding Poster
    [Show full text]
  • United States
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES ISTo. 146 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT Pit IN TING OFFICE 189C UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHAKLES D. WALCOTT, DI11ECTOK BIBLIOGRAPHY AND INDEX NORTH AMEEICAN GEOLOGY, PALEONTOLOGY, PETEOLOGT, AND MINERALOGY THE YEA.R 1895 FEED BOUGHTON WEEKS WASHINGTON Cr O V E U N M K N T P K 1 N T I N G OFFICE 1890 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of trail smittal...... ....................... .......................... 7 Introduction.............'................................................... 9 List of publications examined............................................... 11 Classified key to tlio index .......................................... ........ 15 Bibliography ............................................................... 21 Index....................................................................... 89 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE INTEEIOE, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, DIVISION OF GEOLOGY, Washington, D. 0., June 23, 1896. SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith the manuscript of a Bibliography and Index of North American Geology, Paleontology, Petrology, and Mineralogy for the year 1895, and to request that it be published as a bulletin of the Survey. Very respectfully, F. B. WEEKS. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 1 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND INDEX OF NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY, PALEONTOLOGY, PETROLOGY, AND MINER­ ALOGY FOR THE YEAR 1895. By FRED BOUGHTON WEEKS. INTRODUCTION. The present work comprises a record of publications on North Ameri­ can geology, paleontology, petrology, and mineralogy for the year 1895. It is planned on the same lines as the previous bulletins (Nos. 130 and 135), excepting that abstracts appearing in regular periodicals have been omitted in this volume. Bibliography. The bibliography consists of full titles of separate papers, classified by authors, an abbreviated reference to the publica­ tion in which the paper is printed, and a brief summary of the con­ tents, each paper being numbered for index reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of the Middle Ordovician Copenhagen Formation and Its Trilobites in Nevada
    Distribution of the Middle Ordovician Copenhagen Formation and its Trilobites in Nevada GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 749 Distribution of the Middle Ordovician Copenhagen Formation and its Trilobites in Nevada By REUBEN JAMES ROSS, JR., and FREDERICK C. SHAW GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 749 Descriptions of Middle Ordovician trilobites belonging to 21 genera contribute to correlations between similar strata in Nevada) California) and 0 klahoma UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. lVIOR TON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 78-190301 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 70 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-2109 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ______________________________ -------------------------------------------------- 1 Descriptions of trilobites __________________________________________________ _ 14 Introduction ________________________________________________________________________ _ 1 Genus T1·iarth1·us Green, 1832 .... ------------------------------ 14 Previous investigations _____________________________________________ _ 1 Genus Carrickia Tripp, 1965 ____________________________________ _ 14 Acknowledgments-------------------------------------------------------· 1 Genus Hypodicranotus Whittington, 1952 _____________ _ 15 Geographic occurrences of the Copenhagen Genus Robergia Wiman, 1905·----------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Seismicity and Tectonic Relationships of the Nemaha Uplift in Oklahoma, Part Ii, January 1979 References: 1
    • \;\. UNITED STATES tlw19. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 MEMORANDUM FOR: Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Robert B. Minogue, Director Office of Standards Development FROM: Saul Levine, Director Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research SUBJECT: RESEARCH INFORMATION LETTER NO. 70 SEISMICITY AND TECTONIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE NEMAHA UPLIFT IN OKLAHOMA, PART II, JANUARY 1979 REFERENCES: 1. Letter W. R. Stratton to Dixie Lee Ray, dated May 16, 1973, Subject: Report on Seismic Research 2. Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 100, CFR Appendix A - Seismic and Geologic Siting Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants 3. Memo N. B. Steuer to R. J. Mattson, dated July 15, 1975, Subject: U.S. Tectonic Province Map INTRODUCTION This memo transmits NUREG/CR-0875 entitled, 11 Seismicity and Tectonic Relationships of the Nemaha Uplift in Oklahoma, Part II. 11 The research effort to produce this report was conducted by the Oklahoma Geological Survey. This research.is a cooperative geologic, seismic and geophysical effort of the State Geological Surveys of Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa and Minnesota to study the earth science parameters of the Nemaha Uplift {NU) and the Midcontinent Gravity Anomaly (MGA). The NU and MGA are buried geologic structures along with which some scientists have associated a history of .earthquake activity. Hence, a knowledge of the NU and MGA is of vital importance in the siting and licensing of nuclear power plants. SUMMARY . The Oklahoma Geological Survey's geologic and seismologic investigations of the NU continued in FY 1978. The geologic studies concentrated on (1) the completion of structure-contour maps on the top of the Viola Formation, the base of the Pennsylvanian, and the top of the Oswego Formation; and (2) a detailed structure-history study of the NU in the Oklahoma City area.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Paleontological Conference Th
    Polish Academy of Sciences Institute of Paleobiology 9th Paleontological Conference Warszawa, 10–11 October 2008 Abstracts Warszawa Praha Bratislava Edited by Andrzej Pisera, Maria Aleksandra Bitner and Adam T. Halamski Honorary Committee Prof. Oldrich Fatka, Charles University of Prague, Prague Prof. Josef Michalík, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava Assoc. Prof. Jerzy Nawrocki, Polish Geological Institute, Warszawa Prof. Tadeusz Peryt, Polish Geological Institute, Warszawa Prof. Grzegorz Racki, Institute of Paleobiology, Warszawa Prof. Jerzy Trammer, University of Warsaw, Warszawa Prof. Alfred Uchman, Jagiellonian University, Kraków Martyna Wojciechowska, National Geographic Polska, Warszawa Organizing Committee Dr Maria Aleksandra Bitner (Secretary), Błażej Błażejewski, MSc, Prof. Andrzej Gaździcki, Dr Adam T. Halamski, Assoc. Prof. Anna Kozłowska, Assoc. Prof. Andrzej Pisera Sponsors Institute of Paleobiology, Warszawa Polish Geological Institute, Warszawa National Geographic Polska, Warszawa Precoptic Co., Warszawa Cover picture: Quenstedtoceras henrici Douvillé, 1912 Cover designed by Aleksandra Hołda−Michalska Copyright © Instytut Paleobiologii PAN Nakład 150 egz. Typesetting and Layout: Aleksandra Szmielew Warszawska Drukarnia Naukowa PAN ABSTRACTS Paleotemperature and paleodiet reconstruction on the base of oxygen and carbon isotopes from mammoth tusk dentine and horse teeth enamel during Late Paleolith and Mesolith MARTINA ÁBELOVÁ State Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr, Mlynská dolina 1, SK−817 04 Bratislava 11, Slovak Republic; [email protected] The use of stable isotopes has proven to be one of the most effective methods in re− constructing paleoenvironments and paleodiet through the upper Pleistocene period (e.g. Fricke et al. 1998; Genoni et al. 1998; Bocherens 2003). This study demonstrates how isotopic data can be employed alongside other forms of evidence to inform on past at great time depths, making it especially relevant to the Palaeolithic where there is a wealth of material potentially available for study.
    [Show full text]