DOCSLIB.ORG

Chickasaw National Recreation Area Geologic Resources Inventory Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Chickasaw National Recreation Area Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/1008 ON THIS PAGE Sunset over Lake of the Arbuckles in Chickasaw National Recreation Area. National Park Service photograph. ON THE COVER A collage of features at Chickasaw National Recreation Area. Clockwise from upper left: waterfall on Travertine Creek; Lincoln Bridge (built in 1909 to connect the town of Sulphur to mineral springs south of Travertine Creek); Vendome Well (the largest artesian well in Oklahoma when drilled in 1922); Buffalo Spring (freshwater from the spring flows into Travertine Creek). National Park Service photographs. Chickasaw National Recreation Area Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/1008 John P. Graham Colorado State University Research Associate National Park Service Geologic Resources Division Geologic Resources Inventory PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 August 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available from the Geologic Resources Inventory website (http://go.nps.gov/gripubs), and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm/). To receive this report in a format optimized for screen readers, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Graham, J. P. 2015. Chickasaw National Recreation Area: Geologic resources inventory report. Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/1008. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 107/129559, August 2015 iiii Contents Page Figures . v Tables . v Executive Summary . vii Products and Acknowledgments . .. xi GRI Products . xi Acknowledgments . xi Geologic Setting and Significance . ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 1 Park Setting . ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 Geologic Significance and Connections . ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������3 Establishment of Chickasaw National Recreation Area . 7 Geologic Features and Processes . .. 9 Freshwater and Mineral Springs . ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������9 Vendome Artesian Well . �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������13 Travertine Creek and Travertine Island . ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������14 Paleontological Resources . ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������15 Sedimentary Features in the Vanoss Formation . 17 Folds and Faults . �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������19 Cave and Karst Features . 23 Rock Creek Drainage Basin . 25 Bromide Hill . �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������25 Geologic Resource Management Issues . ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 27 Groundwater Use and Spring Discharge Monitoring . 27 Water Quality . ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������29 Flooding and Debris Flows . 31 Rockfall . �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������33 Lakeshore Erosion . ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������33 Paleontological Resource Inventory, Monitoring, and Protection . �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������34 External Mineral Exploration and Development . 35 Abandoned Mineral Lands . 37 Geologic History . 39 Phase 1. Rifting of the Craton: Early through Middle Cambrian Period, 541 Million to 500 Million Years Ago . ����������������������������������������39 Phase 2. Shallow Seas Flood the Craton: Late Cambrian through Middle Mississippian Periods, 500 Million to 330 Million Years Ago . 39 Phase 3. Uplift and Deformation: Late Mississippian through Pennsylvanian Periods, 331 Million to 299 Million Years Ago . 42 Phase 4. Erosion Shapes the Modern Landscape: Permian through Quaternary Periods, the Past 299 Million Years. �������������������������������42 Geologic Maps . 45 Source Maps . 45 GRI GIS Data . 45 Geologic Map Data . ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 45 GRI Map Poster . 46 Map Unit Properties Table . ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������46 Use Constraints . 46 Glossary . ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 47 Literature Cited . ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 53 Additional References . 59 Geology of National Park Service Areas . 59 NPS Resource Management Guidance and Documents . 59 Climate Change Resources . 59 iii Contents (continued) Page Geological Surveys and Societies . 59 US Geological Survey Reference Tools . ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������59 Appendix A: Scoping Participants . ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 61 2007 Scoping Meeting Participants . 61 2014 Conference Call Participants . 61 Appendix B: Geologic Resource Laws, Regulations, and Policies . 63 Geologic Map Poster . .in pocket Map Unit Properties Table . .in pocket iv Figures Page Plate 1. Map of Chickasaw National Recreation Area . in pocket Plate 2. Geologic map cross-sections. in pocket Figure 1. Location map of Chickasaw National Recreation Area . 1 Figure 2. Buffalo Spring in Chickasaw National Recreation Area. 1 Figure 3. Lake of the Arbuckles in Chickasaw National Recreation Area. 2 Figure 4. Geologic provinces of Oklahoma. 2 Figure 5. Geologic time scale. 4 Figure 6. Schematic stratigraphic column for Chickasaw National Recreation Area. 5 Figure 7. Schematic of an aquifer. 6 Figure 8. Regional extent of the Arbuckle-Simpson aquifer outcrop in south-central Oklahoma. 7 Figure 9. Schematic of an artesian well. 8 Figure 10. Structures built by the Civilian Conservation Corps in the 1930s. 8 Figure 11. Vendome Well and Flower Park in Chickasaw National Recreation Area. 13 Figure 12. Travertine Creek flows over Little Niagara Falls. 15 Figure 13. Travertine cliffs on Travertine Island. 15 Figure 14. Picnic table on Travertine Island. 15 Figure 15. Common Paleozoic marine invertebrate fossils found in Oklahoma. 16 Figure 16. The Vanoss conglomerate facies in Chickasaw National Recreation Area. 17 Figure 17. Sketch of the Vanoss Formation near the top of Bromide Hill. 18 Figure 18. Schematic illustrations of three general fault types. ..
Recommended publications
  • Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana

    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana

    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana By W. H. EASTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 A study of the stratigraphic and ecologic associa­ tions and significance offossils from the Big Snowy group of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Eastern, William Heyden, 1916- Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. iv, 126 p. illus., diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 348) Part of illustrative matter folded in pocket. Bibliography: p. 101-108. 1. Paleontology Montana. 2. Paleontology Carboniferous. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Carboniferous. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, B.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Faunal analysis Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Faunal relations ______________________________ 22 Purposes of the study_ __________________________ 1 Long-ranging elements...__________________ 22 Organization of present work___ __________________ 3 Elements of Mississippian affinity.._________ 22 Acknowledgments--.-------.- ___________________
  • Revision of Some of Girty's Invertebrate Fossils from the Fayetteville Shale (Mississippian) of Arkansas and Oklahoma Introduction by MACKENZIE GORDON, JR

    Revision of Some of Girty's Invertebrate Fossils from the Fayetteville Shale (Mississippian) of Arkansas and Oklahoma Introduction by MACKENZIE GORDON, JR

    Revision of Some of Girty's Invertebrate Fossils from the Fayetteville Shale (Mississippian) of Arkansas and Oklahoma Introduction By MACKENZIE GORDON, JR. Corals By WILLIAM J. SANDO Pelecypods By JOHN POJETA, JR. Gastropods By ELLIS L. YOCHELSON Trilobites By MACKENZIE GORDON, JR. Ostracodes By I. G. SOHN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 606-A, B, C, D, E, F Papers illustrating and describing certain of G. H. Girty' s invertebrate fossils from the Fayetteville Shale UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 70-650224 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washing.ton, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS [The letters in parentheses preceding the titles are those used to designate the chapters] Page (A) Introduction, by Mackenzie Gordon, Jr _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 (B) Corals, by William J. Sando__________________________________________________________________________________ 9 (C) Pelecypods, by John Pojeta, Jr _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 15 (D) Gastropods, by Ellis L.
  • 02 Inside Front Cover

    02 Inside Front Cover

    156 JAMES HALL’S (1856) ROSTROCONCHS? VOL. 106 James Hall’s (1856) Rostroconchs from the Mississippian of Indiana and Illinois1 RICHARD D. HOARE, Department of Geology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403 ABSTRACT. Hall (1856) described without illustrations six species of the rostroconch Conocardium in his study of the fauna of the Salem Limestone in Indiana and the Warsaw Shale in Illinois. The species represent five genera, two of which are new, Leptoconocardium and Kyoconocardium. Other species represent the genera Hippocardia Brown, 1843; Oxyprora Hoare, Mapes, and Yancey, 2002; and Diedrorynchus Hoare and Peck, 2005. OHIO J SCI 106 (4):156-163, 2006 INTRODUCTION have reduced the outer shell layer so that fine orna- In a continuing study of Upper Paleozoic rostro- mentation is often obliterated or poorly preserved. The conchs it was thought useful to locate and examine the ornamentation may not show up when the specimens Mississippian (Meremecian) specimens described by Hall are coated for photography, but is visible when un- (1856) from the Salem Limestone in Indiana and the coated or when slightly wet. Many of the fossils in the Warsaw Shale in Illinois. This study would compliment Salem Limestone are coated with a banded, oolitic-like those made from the Mississippian in Ohio (Hyde 1953; coating which may hide the ornamentation. Remnants of Hoare 1990, 2004) and West Virginia (Hoare and Peck the larval shell are present on some specimens. 2005). The purposes of this study are: 1) to redescribe All of the specimens are small, ranging in length from and photographically illustrate Hall’s specimens; 2) to 2.3 mm to 12.0 mm.
  • Wissenschaftliche Originale in Den Sammlungen BGR/LBEG, Hannover Und BGR, Berlin

    Wissenschaftliche Originale in Den Sammlungen BGR/LBEG, Hannover Und BGR, Berlin

    Wissenschaftliche Originale in den Sammlungen BGR/LBEG, Hannover und BGR, Berlin Schriftenverzeichnis V. DANIELS, C.H., HEINKE, A., HEUNISCH, C., LINDERT, W. & WIESE, T. Papierversion: 93 Seiten; Archiv-Nr. BGR/LBEG 0117040 Berichtsdatum: 03. 03. 1998 Diese Version wurde aktualisiert am: 06. 01. 2020 durch T. Wiese Wissenschaftliche Originale in den Sammlungen BGR/LBEG, Hannover und BGR, Berlin Schriftenverzeichnis V. DANIELS, C. H., HEINKE, A., HEUNISCH, C., LINDERT, W. & WIESE, T. „Unter Original wird im folgenden jedes Stück verstanden, das in der Literatur abgebildet ist.“ (P. DIENST 1928) Wissenschaftliche Originale gehören zu den wertvollsten Stücken jeder Sammlung. Ein erheblicher Anteil der Nutzeranfragen gilt ihnen. Die Orginale-Sammlungen der Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR) in Hannover und Berlin sowie des Landesamtes für Bergbau, Energie und Geologie (LBEG), Hannover, sind zwar zum heutigen Zeitpunkt weitestgehend erfaßt - davon auch große Teile DV- mäßig - und damit gut recherchierbar, es fehlte jedoch bisher eine aktuelle Literaturübersicht für die interessierte Fachwelt. Mit dem vorliegenden Schriftenverzeichnis wird diese Lücke geschlossen. Die Originale-Sammlungen in Hannover und Berlin sind nicht nur räumlich getrennt, auch ihr historischer Hintergrund, ihre Quellen und die Art der Katalogisierung sind verschieden. Geschichtliches Im Jahr 1873 wurde in Berlin die Königlich-Preußische Geologische Landesanstalt gegründet, die 1939 in der Reichsstelle für Bodenforschung (ab 1941 Reichsamt für Bodenforschung) aufging. Nach Gründung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland wurden die Bundesaufgaben zunächst dem Amt für Bodenforschung in Hannover übertragen. 1958 wurde die Bundesanstalt für Bodenforschung (ab 1975 Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, BGR) aus dem Bestand des Amtes für Bodenforschung errichtet. Die BGR arbeitet auf der Grundlage eines Verwaltungsabkommens eng mit dem Landesamtes für Bergbau, Energie und Geologie (LBEG) zusammen.
  • Paleontological Resource Inventory at Chickasaw National Recreation Area, Oklahoma

    Paleontological Resource Inventory at Chickasaw National Recreation Area, Oklahoma

    Sullivan, R.M. and Lucas, S.G., eds., 2016, Fossil Record 5. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 74. 5 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCE INVENTORY AT CHICKASAW NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, OKLAHOMA MADISON L. ARMSTRONG1, ALYSIA S. KORN2, VINCENT L. SANTUCCI3 and JUSTIN TWEET4 1NPS Geoscientists-in-the-Parks, 413 Cottonwood St., Ardmore, OK 73401 -email: [email protected]; 2NPS Geoscientists-in-the-Parks, 411 Magee Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111; -email: [email protected] 3National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW, Washington, D.C. 20005; -email: [email protected]; 4Tweet Paleo-Consulting, 9149 79th St. S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016; -email: [email protected] Abstract—Chickasaw National Recreation Area (CHIC), located in south-central Oklahoma east of the Arbuckle Mountains, is best known for its wildlife and water recreation. Few visitors are aware of the important paleontological resources that occur in the park. During the summer of 2016, a comprehensive field inventory of paleontological resources within CHIC was conducted. The inventory process involved primary literature research, an extensive field survey of fossiliferous units, and inventories of collections and repositories. The field survey yielded eight new fossiliferous localities, and eight previously undocumented taxa within CHIC. This is the first discovery of fossils in the Deese Group and Sycamore Limestone within the recreation area. During the 2016 inventory, fossils were documented at all previously known localities within CHIC, except for those localities now submerged under the Lake of the Arbuckles. Collections were made of the representative fauna found within CHIC, and 73 fossil specimens were accessioned into museum collections.
  • 1970 Conocardium Langenheimi SP. N. (MOLLUSCA: BIVALVIA) 13 14 CONTRIBUTIONS in SCIENCE No

    1970 Conocardium Langenheimi SP. N. (MOLLUSCA: BIVALVIA) 13 14 CONTRIBUTIONS in SCIENCE No

    1970 Conocardium langenheimi SP. N. (MOLLUSCA: BIVALVIA) 13 14 CONTRIBUTIONS IN SCIENCE No. 184 function such as brood chambers to the tubes in the dorsal parts of the valves, but, again, close analogies in living bivalves seem absent. Some of the grooves in the shell suggest ciliated tracts, but there is no certainty about this. CONCLUSIONS C. langenheimi is a member of the Conocardidoida, which is externally like the Bivalvia, has a world wide distribution, and ranges from Ordovician through Permian (Triassic?) rocks. The degree of complexity shown by the shell microstructure definitely appears to be molluscan. The paired valves sug- gest that the Order belongs in the Class Bivalvia, however the internal mor- phology and shell microstructure is unlike others in that class. If typical of the order, these suggest need for a reconsideration of the systematic position at the class or higher level. LITERATURE CITED BRANSON, C. C., A. LAROCQUE, AND N. D. NEWELL. 1969. Order Conocardioida, in Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, R. C. MOORE, ed., Bivalvia: Part N. Geol. Soc. America and Univ. Kans. Press, Lawrence, Kansas. 2:491-951, figures. DECHASEAUX, COLETTE. 1952. Etude systematique, in Traite de Paleontologie, J. PIVETEAU, ed. Masson et Cie., Paris. 2:261-364, figs. 35-215. HIND, W. 1900. A monograph of the British Carboniferous Lambellibranchiata, part V. Paleont. Soc., London. 361-476, pis. 40-54. LINNAEUS, CAROLUS. 1758. Systema naturae. Editio decima. Laurentii Salvii, Stock- holm. 1-824. MILLER, S. A. 1889. North American geology and palaeontology for the use of amateurs, students, and scientists. Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati.
  • The Yellowstone Paleontological Survey

    The Yellowstone Paleontological Survey

    E PALEONT ON O T LO S G W I O C L A L L E National Y Park The Yellowstone Service Department of the Interior Paleontological Survey SURVEY Vincent L. Santucci Yellowstone Center for Resources National Park Service Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-NR-98-1 1998 How to cite this document: Santucci, V. L. 1998. The Yellowstone Paleontological Survey. Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming,YCR-NR-98-1. Current address for Vincent L. Santucci is National Park Service, P.O. Box 592, Kemmerer, WY 83101. The Yellowstone Paleontological Survey To Lt. Col. Luke J. Barnett, III “Uncle by blood, brother in spirit!” Vincent L. Santucci Yellowstone Center for Resources National Park Service Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-NR-98-1 1998 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 Stratigraphy .................................................................................................... 4 Fossil Chronology........................................................................................... 6 Taxonomy ..................................................................................................... 12 Localities ...................................................................................................... 15 Interpretation ................................................................................................ 19 Paleontological Resource Management.......................................................
  • Mollusksmollusks the Paleontological Society Http:\\Paleosoc.Org

    Mollusksmollusks the Paleontological Society Http:\\Paleosoc.Org

    MollusksMollusks The Paleontological Society http:\\paleosoc.org Mollusks The concept Mollusca brings together a great deal of cept Mollusca is unified by anatomical similarities, by information about animals that at first glance appear to be embryological similarities, and by evidence from fossils radically different from one another—snails, slugs, of the evolutionary history of the species placed within mussels, clams, oysters, octopuses, squids, and others. the phylum; all this information indicates a common The diversity of the phylum is shown by at least eight ancestry for the groups placed in the phylum. known classes (cover). Estimates of the number of species alive today range from 50,000 to 130,000. Most Most mollusks are free-living multicellular animals that of the shells found on the beaches of the modem world have a multilayered calcareous shell or conch on their belong to mollusks and mollusks are probably the most backs. This exoskeleton provides support for the soft abundant invertebrate animals in modern oceans. organs including a muscular foot and the organs of digestion, respiration, excretion, reproduction, and others. Living mollusks range in size from microscopic snails Around all of the soft parts is a space called the mantle and clams to almost 60 foot long (18 meters) squids. cavity, which is open to the outside. The mantle cavity is They live in most marine and freshwater environments, a passageway for incoming feeding and respiratory and some snails and slugs live on land. In the sea, mol- currents, and an exit for the discharge of wastes. The lusks range from the intertidal zone to the deepest ocean outer wall of the mantle cavity is a thin flap of tissue basins and they may be bottom-dwelling, swimming, or called the mantle, which secretes the shell.
  • Arbuckle Project

    Arbuckle Project

    Arbuckle Project Christopher J. McCune Historic Reclamation Projects Bureau of Reclamation 2002 Table of Contents Table of Contents..............................................................1 The Arbuckle Project...........................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................5 Construction History .....................................................8 Post-Construction History................................................15 Settlement of the Project .................................................19 Uses of Project Water ...................................................20 Conclusion............................................................21 About the Author .............................................................21 Bibliography ................................................................22 Archival Collections ....................................................22 Government Documents .................................................22 Articles...............................................................22 Internet...............................................................22 Other ................................................................22 Index ......................................................................23 1 The Arbuckle Project In 1962, President John F. Kennedy, authorized
  • Oklahoma Geological Survey Publications on Fossils Bulletins

    Oklahoma Geological Survey Publications on Fossils Bulletins

    Oklahoma Geological Survey Publications on Fossils Bulletins Bulletin Part 1. Geology of a portion of northeastern Oklahoma. Part 2. Paleontology of the 24 Chester group in Oklahoma, by L. C. Snider. 1915. Bulletin Fossiliferous boulders in the Ouachita "Caney" shale, and the age of the shale 45 containing them, by E. O. Ulrich. 1927 Bulletin Micropaleontology of the Wetumka, Wewoka, and Holdenville formations, by A. S. 53 Warthin, Jr. 1930. Bulletin Ostracoda of the Simpson Group of Oklahoma, by R. W. Harris. 1957. 75 Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Hunton Group in the Arbuckle Mountain region. Bulletin Part II, Haragan articulate brachiopods, by Thomas W. Amsden. Part III, Supplement 78 to the Henryhouse brachiopods, by Thomas W. Amsden. Part IV, New genera of brachiopods, by Arthur J. Boucot and Thomas W. Amsden. 1958. Bulletin Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Hunton Group in the Arbuckle Mountain region. 82 Part V, Bois d’Arc articulate brachiopods, by Thomas W. Amsden. 1958. Bulletin Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Hunton Group in the Arbuckle Mountain region. 84 Part VI, Stratigraphy, by Thomas W. Amsden. 1960. Bulletin Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Hunton group in the Arbuckle Mountain region. 85 Part VI, Stratigraphy, by Thomas W. Amsden. 1960. Bulletin Late Desmoinesian crinoid faunule from Oklahoma, by Harrell L. Strimple. 1961. 93 Early Devonian brachiopods of Oklahoma. Part I, Articulate brachiopods of the Frisco Formation (Devonian), by Thomas W. Amsden and W. P. S. Ventress. Part II, Bulletin Articulate brachiopods of the Sallisaw Formation (Devonian), by Thomas W. Amsden. 94 Part III, Supplement to the Haragan (Devonian) brachiopods, by Thomas W.
  • Geologic Map of Chickasaw National Recreation Area, Murray County, Oklahoma

    Geologic Map of Chickasaw National Recreation Area, Murray County, Oklahoma

    Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Geologic Map of Chickasaw National Recreation Area, Murray County, Oklahoma Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3258 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 1 2 3 4 Cover photographs: 1 Massive sandstone, Vanoss Formation (*vs), see fig. 5. 2 Old abandoned quarry exposing Hunton Group (DSOh) and crest of Tishomingo anticline in southeastern part of map area (looking east-southest), see map sheet. 3 Lower Hunton Group (SOhl, Cochrane Formation), see fig. 4. 4 Woodford Shale (MDsw), see fig. 5. Geologic Map of Chickasaw National Recreation Area, Murray County, Oklahoma By Charles D. Blome, David J. Lidke, Ronald R. Wahl, and James A. Golab Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3258 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 Revised May 8, 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
  • Title Permian Bivalves of Japan Author(S) Nakazawa, Keiji; Newell

    Title Permian Bivalves of Japan Author(S) Nakazawa, Keiji; Newell

    Title Permian Bivalves of Japan Author(s) Nakazawa, Keiji; Newell, D. Norman Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyoto University. Series of Citation geology and mineralogy (1968), 35(1): 1-108 Issue Date 1968-10-11 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/186552 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University MEMOIRs oF THE FAcuLTy oF SclENcE, KyOTo UNIvERslTY, SERIEs oF GEoL. MINERAL.& Vol. XXXV, No. 1, pp. 1-108, Pls. 1-11 Permian Bivalves of Japan By Keiji NAKAzAwA and Norman D. NEwELL* (Received Aprii 28, 1968) Abstract Permian bivalve molluscs ofJapan shed interesting new light on the paleontological com- position of the youngest, post-fusulinid, marine faunas of the highest Paleozoic, and the bivalves tend to bridge the gap between the uppermost Permian and the lowest Triassic occupied in most regions ofthe world by a hiatus. However, there is a noteworthy break, even inJapan, between the Permian and Triassic ,systems where there are no bivalve species in common between the Permian and Triassic. Ninety-six species belonging to 46 genera of bivalves are distinguished in theJapanese Perrnian. Among these, 58 species, ofwhich 18 are new, are described in this paper. TowaPteria, Ensi teria, Tambanelta, HayasakaPecten, and Gnjocardita are proposed herein as new genera, and PermoPerna is presented as a new subgenus of Waagenoperna. It is worthy of note that the bivalves did not decrease in number and diversity during the late Permian, in contrast to some other invertebrates, and that the late Permian Gujo Formation con- tains a mixed fauna of Permian and Triassic aspect. Some Mesozoic types, such as Neoschizodus, Costatoria and WaagemoPerna, appeared in the middle Permian Kanokura Series.