Walter Jakob Gehring: a Master of Developmental Biology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Walter Jakob Gehring: a Master of Developmental Biology RETROSPECTIVE RETROSPECTIVE Walter Jakob Gehring: A master of developmental biology Markus Affoltera,1 and Kurt Wüthrichb,c about modern DNA research, and then aGrowth and Development, Biozentrum der Universität Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland; moved to the newly founded “Biozentrum” bInstitut für Molekularbiologie und Biophysik, Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule c at the University of Basel in 1972. With Hönggerberg, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland; and Department of Integrated Structural and a solid background of cloning techniques, Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institue, La Jolla, CA 92037 Walter and collaborators established the first Drosophila gene bank in Europe, and with Alfred Tissiere’s group at the University of With Walter J. Gehring’sdeathinBaselon and transdetermination his thesis subject. At Geneva identified and characterized several May29,2014,thescientificcommunitylost that time, his interest was caught by a Dro- genes from this bank (1). Now, Walter’sma- one of the pioneers of molecular develop- sophila mutant, which carried an extra leg jor aim—to clone developmental regulatory mental biology. Walter will be missed by instead of the antenna on the fly head. The genes—was coming closer. After an extended a large community of friends and colleagues, gene mutated in this stock later turned out to walk along the chromosome, the Antp gene but he lives on in the work of the many be Antennapedia (Antp), a homeotic gene re- of Drosophila was cloned in 1983 (2). The big scientists whom he had mentored and who sponsible for the formation of the fly seg- surprise came when it turned out that Antp now work in his and related fields. ment on which the second leg pair is formed. shared a 180-bp segment with other home- Walter J. Gehring, born in Zurich in 1939, Walter called this remarkable Drosophila fly otic genes found in Drosophila (3) and “ ” became interested in developmental biology Nasobemia. In his own words, Nasobemia other organisms, including humans (4). early on in his life as he watched beautiful accompanied Walter through his life, and The homeobox was born, and it turned butterflies emerging out of rather ugly pupae cloning of the underlying gene and finding out that this stretch of DNA coded for the stored in a cardboard box given to him out how mutation of a single gene could give DNA-binding “homeodomain” of a wide by his uncle. Walter went on to study bird rise to a new, fully developed structure in the variety of proteins. migration for his diploma work, and then wrongplace,wasamajoraimofhisresearch Walter Gehring was the initiator of an pursued doctoral studies with Ernst Hadorn, from this point onward. important episode in structural biology, which an eminent developmental geneticist teaching After obtaining his doctoral degree at the involved M.A. as his postdoctoral student at the University of Zürich. Drosophila mel- University of Zürich, Walter Gehring joined and K.W. as an external collaborator. Be- anogaster was Walter’s experimental system, the laboratory of Alan Garen at Yale to learn cause this work is less prominent in records about Walter than his contributions to molecular and cell biology, we describe here this part of his scientific life in some detail, as it is a nice illustration of Walter’sbroad interest and unbeatable enthusiasm. On March 21, 1986, Walter and K.W., who had not met previously, listened to each other’s plenary lectures at the 18th Union of Swiss Societies for Experimental Biology (USGEB) Meeting in Basel. Walter talked about the homeobox and K.W. about pro- tein structure determination by NMR. The following week, Walter called K.W. to in- quire about possible interest to determine the structure of the Antp homeodomain with the then new and little proven NMR method. After being informed that milligram quantities of the highly purified protein would be needed, Walter apparently nurtured some doubts about the wisdom of his initiative, be- cause his laboratory was used to work with at most micrograms of the Antp homeodomain. Author contributions: M.A. and K.W. wrote the paper. Walter J. Gehring speaking at a developmental biology meeting at the Biozentrum in 2009. 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: Markus. Image courtesy of the Biozentrum of the University of Basel (Basel). [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1413434111 PNAS Early Edition | 1of2 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 Nonetheless, after two years of hard work, Subsequent to the homeobox success story, Royal Society of London and the US National Walter and his collaborators drove to Walter Gehring’s laboratory again gained Academy of Science. Zurich and personally handed 12 milligrams broad attention, both in scientific circles as Walter was a well-read zoologist, hands- of the Antp homeodomain to the NMR well as in the general public, with the discov- on marine biologist, and passionate bird spectroscopists. The structure was deter- ery that flies and mammals share a gene called watcher. In Banyuls-sur-mer he taught a bi- mined with homonuclear NMR, lifting PAX6, which is involved in the formation of ennial two-week course on marine biology. Walter’s enthusiasm to the next level: that facetted eyes in flies, and lens eyes in mice and These two weeks included molecular biology is, to have a go at determination of the humans (8). Moreover, when inappropriately experiments, cultural excursions, and experi- homeodomain–DNA complex, which would expressed, this single gene was capable of in- encing the local cuisine. An excellent dinner also be a novel achievement in NMR struc- ducing ectopic eye structures on all appen- with good wine, entertaining stories and ture determination. This next step required dages in flies, and so did the ectopic jokes—as well as lively scientific discus- isotope labeling of the homeodomain with expression of the human gene (9)! This was sions—was Walter’s preferred way to spend 13Cand15N. According to well-documented one of the most dramatic and spectacular an evening! It was also to a large extent in and often repeated statements by Walter, demonstrations of the power of a develop- Banyuls-sur-mer that Walter wrote the regu- the expense for the isotopes made this the mental master control gene, and represented lar updates of Zoologie, a textbook that he most expensive single experiment in his ca- the basis for Walter’shypothesisthatdifferent coauthored with Rüdiger Wehner. Until his reer, and there was apparently a lot of ex- eye structures in different species originated death, Walter also continued to work at the citement in his laboratory during this from a common ancestral eye structure under Biozentrum, planning new experiments and protein preparation. In due time, Walter the control of PAX6 in a primitive animal. maintaining himself a significant collection of drove to Zurich and personally handed Walter Gehring’s outstanding contribu- fly stocks. Ongoing studies of Walter’sgroup the labeled homeodomain preparation to tions were recognized by numerous presti- address the molecular aspects of vision; he the NMR spectroscopists. When it turned gious awards, including the Jeantet Prize wanted to test a number of hypotheses re- out that the structure of the homeo- for Medecine (1987), the Gairdner Award garding the emergence of vision in evolution domain–DNA complex contained features (1987), the Kyoto Prize for Basic Science (10). Walter Gehring will not see the results that had been predicted by him and col- (2000), and the Balzan Prize for Develop- of these latest studies, which he initiated, but leagues in his laboratory, Walter’s enthusi- mental Biology (2002). Walter was elected the research will go on and his memory will asm had no limits. This collaborative to several national academies, including the be with us while this happens. project, which resulted in the structure determination of the Antp homeodomain (5), its DNA complex (6), and a variety of 1 Schedl P, et al. (1978) Two hybrid plasmids with D. melanogaster Comparison with prokaryotic repressors. Cell 59(3): variant Antp homeodomains and several DNA sequences complementary to mRNA coding for the major heat 573–580. shock protein. Cell 14(4):921–929. 6 Gehring WJ, et al. (1994) Homeodomain-DNA recognition. Cell different wild-type homeodomains (see, for 2 Garber RL, Kuroiwa A, Gehring WJ (1983) Genomic and cDNA 78(2):211–223. example, ref. 7), was a great experience and clones of the homeotic locus Antennapedia in Drosophila. EMBO J 7 Qian YQ, et al. (1994) Nuclear magnetic resonance solution resulted in lasting friendships among those 2(11):2027–2036. structure of the fushi tarazu homeodomain from Drosophila and 3 McGinnis W, Levine MS, Hafen E, Kuroiwa A, Gehring WJ comparison with the Antennapedia homeodomain. J Mol Biol involved. It also provided a unique oppor- (1984) A conserved DNA sequence in homoeotic genes of the 238(3):333–345. tunity to apply the then new NMR method Drosophila Antennapedia and bithorax complexes. Nature 8 Quiring R, Walldorf U, Kloter U, Gehring WJ (1994) Homology of 308(5958):428–433. the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the Small eye gene in mice and for macromolecular structure determination 4 McGinnis W, Garber RL, Wirz J, Kuroiwa A, Gehring WJ (1984) Aniridia in humans. Science 265(5173):785–789. with a highly visible, front-line biology A homologous protein-coding sequence in Drosophila homeotic 9 Halder G, Callaerts P, Gehring WJ (1995) Induction of ectopic eyes project. The biomolecular NMR commu- genes and its conservation in other metazoans. Cell 37(2): by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila. Science 403–408. 267(5205):1788–1792. nity owes a lot to Walter Gehring for his 5 Qian YQ, et al. (1989) The structure of the Antennapedia 10 Gehring WJ (2014) The evolution of vision.
Recommended publications
  • Perspectives
    Copyright 0 1994 by the Genetics Society of America Perspectives Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics Edited by James F. Crow and William F. Dove A Century of Homeosis, A Decade of Homeoboxes William McGinnis Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8114 NE hundred years ago, while the science of genet- ing mammals, and were proposed to encode DNA- 0 ics still existed only in the yellowing reprints of a binding homeodomainsbecause of a faint resemblance recently deceased Moravian abbot, WILLIAMBATESON to mating-type transcriptional regulatory proteins of (1894) coined the term homeosis to define a class of budding yeast and an even fainter resemblance to bac- biological variations in whichone elementof a segmen- terial helix-turn-helix transcriptional regulators. tally repeated array of organismal structures is trans- The initial stream of papers was a prelude to a flood formed toward the identity of another. After the redis- concerning homeobox genes and homeodomain pro- coveryof MENDEL’Sgenetic principles, BATESONand teins, a flood that has channeled into a steady river of others (reviewed in BATESON1909) realized that some homeo-publications, fed by many tributaries. A major examples of homeosis in floral organs and animal skel- reason for the continuing flow of studies is that many etons could be attributed to variation in genes. Soon groups, working on disparate lines of research, have thereafter, as the discipline of Drosophila genetics was found themselves swept up in the currents when they born and was evolving into a formidable intellectual found that their favorite protein contained one of the force enriching many biologicalsubjects, it gradually be- many subtypes of homeodomain.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW Cell and Molecular Biology of Notch
    459 REVIEW Cell and molecular biology of Notch Ulla-Maj Fiu´za and Alfonso Martinez Arias Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK (Correspondence should be addressed to U-M Fiu´za; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Notch signalling is a cell–cell communication process, which complexity which could account for the multitude of roles it has allows the establishment of patterns of gene expression and during development and in adult organisms. In this review, we differentiation, regulates binary cell fate choice and the will describe the multiple roles of Notch and how various factors maintenance of stem cell populations. So far, the data published can regulate Notch signalling. has elucidated the main players in the Notch signalling pathway. Journal of Endocrinology (2007) 194, 459–474 However, its regulatory mechanisms are exhibiting an increasing The structure of Notch and the Notch signalling which allowed the discovery of a core set of molecules involved pathway in Notch signalling and lead to the understanding of how they organize into a signalling pathway. The Notch genes encode members of a family of receptors that In mammals, there are four Notch genes and five genes mediate short-range signalling events. A prototypical Notch encoding ligands, three Delta-like and two Jagged (Fig. 1). In gene encodes a single transmembrane receptor composed in Drosophila, there is only one Notch-encoding gene, one Delta its extracellular region of a conserved array of up to 36 and one Jagged homologue (Serrate; Maine et al. 1995, epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats, involved in Lissemore & Starmer 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetics of Floral Homeotic Genes in Relation to Sexual Dimorphism in the 2 Dioecious Plant Mercurialis Annua
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/481481; this version posted November 29, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Epigenetics of floral homeotic genes in relation to sexual dimorphism in the 2 dioecious plant Mercurialis annua 3 4 Janardan Khadka1, Narendra Singh Yadav1†, Micha Guy1, Gideon Grafi1* and Avi Golan- 5 Goldhirsh1* 6 1French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Jacob Blaustein 7 Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben Gurion 8 84990, Israel. 9 †Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, AB T1K 10 3M4, Canada. 11 * To whom correspondence should be addressed 12 13 14 Highlights 15 Sex determination in Mercurialis annua is not related to epigenetics of floral homeotic genes 16 but appears to be modulated by an unknown gender-specific regulator(s) that affects hormonal 17 homeostasis. 18 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/481481; this version posted November 29, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 19 Abstract 20 In plants, dioecy characterizes species carrying male and female flowers on separate plants 21 and occurs in about 6% of angiosperms. To date, the molecular mechanism(s) underlying 22 sexual dimorphism is essentially unknown. The ability of gender-reversal by hormone 23 application suggests that epigenetics might play an important role in sexual dimorphism.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeotic Gene Action in Embryonic Brain Development of Drosophila
    Development 125, 1579-1589 (1998) 1579 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1998 DEV1254 Homeotic gene action in embryonic brain development of Drosophila Frank Hirth, Beate Hartmann and Heinrich Reichert* Institute of Zoology, University of Basel, Rheinsprung 9, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 18 February; published on WWW 1 April 1998 SUMMARY Studies in vertebrates show that homeotic genes are absence of labial, mutant cells are generated and positioned involved in axial patterning and in specifying segmental correctly in the brain, but these cells do not extend axons. identity of the embryonic hindbrain and spinal cord. To Additionally, extending axons of neighboring wild-type gain further insights into homeotic gene action during CNS neurons stop at the mutant domains or project ectopically, development, we here characterize the role of the homeotic and defective commissural and longitudinal pathways genes in embryonic brain development of Drosophila. We result. Immunocytochemical analysis demonstrates that first use neuroanatomical techniques to map the entire cells in the mutant domains do not express neuronal anteroposterior order of homeotic gene expression in the markers, indicating a complete lack of neuronal identity. Drosophila CNS, and demonstrate that this order is An alternative glial identity is not adopted by these mutant virtually identical in the CNS of Drosophila and mammals. cells. Comparable effects are seen in Deformed mutants but We then carry out a genetic analysis of the labial gene in not in other homeotic gene mutants. Our findings embryonic brain development. Our analysis shows that demonstrate that the action of the homeotic genes labial loss-of-function mutation and ubiquitous overexpression of and Deformed are required for neuronal differentiation in labial results in ectopic expression of neighboring the developing brain of Drosophila.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeotic Transformations and Limb Defects in Hox All Mutant Mice
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 4, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Homeotic transformations and limb defects in Hox All mutant mice Kersten M. Small and S. Steven Potter ~ Division of Basic Science Research, Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229 USA Hox All is one of the expanded set of vertebrate homeo box (Hox) genes with similarities to the Drosophila homeotic gene, Abdominal-B (Abd-B). These Abd-B-type Hox genes have been shown to be expressed in the most caudal regions of the developing vertebrate embryo and in overlapping domains within the developing limbs, suggesting that these genes play important roles in pattern formation in both appendicular and axial regions of the body. In this report whole-mount in situ hybridization in mouse embryos gave a precise description of Hox All gene expression in the developing limbs and in the axial domain of the developing body. In addition, we generated a targeted mutation in Hox All and characterized the resulting phenotype to begin to dissect developmental functions of the Abd-B subfamily of Hox genes. Hox All mutant mice exhibited double homeotic transformations, with the thirteenth thoracic segment posteriorized to form an additional first lumbar vertebra and with the sacral region anteriorized, generating yet another lumbar segment. Furthermore, skeletal malformations were observed in both forelimbs and hindlimbs. In mutant forelimbs, the ulna and radius were misshapen, the pisiform and triangular carpal bones were fused, and abnormal sesamoid bone development occurred. In mutant hindlimbs the tibia and fibula were joined incorrectly and malformed at their distal ends.
    [Show full text]
  • Fusion of PAX3 to a Member of the Forkhead Family of Transcription Factors in Human Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma1
    [CANCER RESEARCH 53, 5108-5112. November 1. 1993] Advances in Brief Fusion of PAX3 to a Member of the Forkhead Family of Transcription Factors in Human Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma1 David N. Shapiro,2 Jack E. Sublett, Baitao Li, James R. Downing, and Clayton W. Naeve Departments of Experimental Oncology /I). N. S., J. E. S., B. L.¡.Hcmatology/Oncology ¡D.N. S./, Pathology [J. R. D.¡, Tumor Cell Biology /J. R. D./, anil Virology and Molecular Biology fC. W. N.¡,St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Memphis. Tennessee 38105, and Departments of Pediatrics [D. N. S.¡and Pathology /./. R. D.. C. W. N.J, University of Tennessee College of Medicine. Memphis. Tennessee 38163 Abstract alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma and show that this rearrangement results in the creation of a chimeric fusion gene composed of 5' PAX3 Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, a malignant tumor of skeletal muscle, is sequences juxtaposed to 3' sequences derived from a previously un- characterized by a chromosomal translocation, t(2;13)(q35;ql4). This described member of the forkhead family of transcription factors, translocation Is associated with a structural rearrangement of the gene provisionally designated ALV (7). In PAX3-ALV, the putative 3' tran encoding /' 1 \ ¡.a presumed transcriptional regulator expressed exclu sively during embryogenesis. The breakpoint results in a fusion between scriptional activation domain of PAX3 is replaced by the bisected PAX3 and a gene provisionally named ALV, a novel member of the fork- forkhead binding domain of ALV, while retaining the structural integ head family of transcription factors. In PAX3-ALV, the structural integrity rity of the PAX3 paired box and homeodomain.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Developmental Biology Gene Regulation in Fruit Flies
    Evolutionary Developmental Gene regulation in fruit flies Biology • Maternal effect genes, which are genes in the mother’s genome for RNAs that are pumped into each egg cell, regulate. • gap genes, which determine large areas of the embryo, and which regulate. • pair-rule genes, which are expressed in alternating bands and specify the future segments of the embryo, and which regulate. • homeotic genes, which determine segment identity, and EVO DEVO which regulate. • realisator genes, which cause segment differentiation a.k.a. “EVO-DEVO” Drosophila egg, showing the location of the maternal Maternal genes mRNA bicoid (top) and the localization of the bicoid regulate gap genes; for protein, forming a gradient from the future head end example, bicoid (top) to the tail end regulates hunchback (middle, shown in orange) and Krüppel (middle, shown in green). Gap genes regulate pair-rule genes such as fushi tarazu (bottom). Both gap and pair-rule genes regulate homeotic genes. 1 Early-stage Drosophila embryo, stained to show the expression patterns of the pair-rule genes even- skipped (dark blue) and fushi tarazu (brown). Pair- rule genes regulate segment-polarity genes (which I Just a part of the ain’t getting’ into here) and homeotic genes. gene regulatory cascade, and we haven’t even got to the homeotic genes yet. Homeotic Genes Computer model of • Homeotic genes contain a 180-bp sequence the Ubx protein called a homeobox that codes for the DNA- (shown in gray) binding part of the protein (the homeodomain). binding to DNA (shown in orange). • Homeotic genes lay down segment identity This helix-turn-helix – As such, homeotic genes determine the placement protein interacts with of major structures RNA polymerase II to – For example: the homeotic gene Ultrabithorax, or control the expression Ubx, regulates a set of a dozen genes that of other genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrabithorax Is Essential for Bacteriocyte Development
    Ultrabithorax is essential for bacteriocyte development Yu Matsuuraa,b,c, Yoshitomo Kikuchid, Toru Miurab, and Takema Fukatsua,c,1 aBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8566, Japan; bGraduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan; cGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan; and dBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Hokkaido Center, Sapporo 062-8517, Japan Edited by Nancy A. Moran, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved June 19, 2015 (received for review February 18, 2015) Symbiosis often entails the emergence of novel adaptive traits in transcription factors, in particular Ultrabithorax (Ubx), are involved organisms. Microbial symbionts are indispensable for diverse insects in the development of the host cells and organs specialized for via provisioning of essential nutrients, wherein novel host cells and harboring the symbiotic bacteria. organs for harboring the microbes, called bacteriocytes and bacter- iomes, have evolved repeatedly. Molecular and developmental mech- Results and Discussion anisms underpinning the emergence of novel symbiotic cells and Bacteriocyte Development During Embryogenesis of N. plebeius. We organs comprise an unsolved question in evolutionary developmental performed a detailed description of the embryogenesis of N. ple- biology. Here, we report that a conserved
    [Show full text]
  • Homeobox Genes and Their Functional Significance in Ovarian Tumorigenesis
    10 Homeobox Genes and Their Functional Significance in Ovarian Tumorigenesis Bon Quy Trinh and Honami Naora University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center USA 1. Introduction It is widely recognized that many pathways that control normal embryonic patterning are deregulated in human cancers. Mutations or aberrant expression of components of the Wnt, Hedgehog and Notch signaling pathways have been demonstrated to play pivotal roles in tumorigenesis. Homeobox genes constitute an evolutionarily conserved gene super-family that represents another important class of patterning regulators. These genes encode transcription factors that are essential for controlling cell differentiation and specification of the body plan during embryonic development. Although many homeobox genes have been reported to be aberrantly expressed in ovarian cancer, the functional significance of these genes in ovarian tumorigenesis has only emerged in recent years. This chapter discusses recent research studies that demonstrate that homeobox genes have diverse functions in the biology of ovarian cancer. These functions include specifying patterns of histologic differentiation of ovarian cancers, controlling growth and survival of tumor cells, and promoting tumor angiogenesis, cell-cell interactions and tumor cell invasiveness. This chapter discusses how studies of homeobox genes provide insights into our understanding of the cell-of-origin of ovarian cancers, the striking morphologic heterogeneity of these tumors, and the unique clinical behavior of ovarian cancer. 2. Overview of homeobox genes Homeobox genes were first discovered in Drosophila by their mutations that caused homeotic transformation, a phenomenon in which body segments form in inappropriate locations (Gehring & Hiromi, 1986; McGinnis & Krumlauf, 1992). A classic example of a homeotic transformation in Drosophila is the formation of legs rather than antennae caused by ectopic expression of the Antennapedia gene (Schneuwly et al., 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • “Indeed, the Homeobox Has Been Called the 'Rosetta Stone' Of
    “Indeed, the Homeobox has been called the ‘Rosetta Stone’ of Developmental Biology” “Indeed, the Homeobox has been called the ‘Rosetta Stone’ of Developmental Biology” The Rosetta Stone - discovered in 1799 by the French under Napoleon, surrendered to the British. Now resides in London in the British Museum. Contains a proclamation in Greek and Egyptian (hiero- glyphics and demotic) from the Ptolemeic era (196 BC). Figure 9.28 Homeotic Gene Expression in Drosophila 1 Gene Duplication as an evolutionary mechanism Hox1 Duplication Event Hox1 Hox1 Duplicate evolves new function Hox1 Hox2 Repeated duplication, divergence Hox1.1 Hox1.2 Hox2.1 Hox2.2 Hox3 Hox4 A homeotic gene complex (HOM-C ) was present in the ancestor of all animals, patterning the anterior-posterior axis. Gene Duplication as an evolutionary mechanism species 1 Hox Gene duplication, divergence species 1 Paralogs Hoxα Hoxβ Speciation event species 2 species 3 Hoxα Hoxβ Hoxα Hoxβ Orthologs Gene evolutionary relationships Paralogs Homologs - share a common ancestor Paralogs - arise by gene duplication event Orthologs - arise by speciation event HOM-C Complex Duplication occurred in vertebrate evolution Single HOM-C in Hox1 Hox2 Hox3 Hox4 Hox5 Hox6 pre-vertebrate chordate Whole chromosome or whole genome duplication (WGD) event Hox1 Hox2 Hox3 Hox4 Hox5 Hox6 Hox1 Hox2 Hox3 Hox4 Hox5 Hox6 Divergence of HOM-C’s: gene loss, duplication, etc. HoxA HoxA1 HoxA2 HoxA3 HoxA4 HoxA6 HoxB HoxB1 HoxB3 HoxB4 HoxB5 HoxB6 HoxB6 HoxB6 Most vertebrates have four HOM-C’s; teleost fish have up to
    [Show full text]
  • A Homeotic Gene of the Antennapedia Complex
    Development 113, 257-271 (1991) 257 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1991 Rescue and regulation of proboscipedia: a homeotic gene of the Antennapedia Complex FILIPPO M. RANDAZZO, DAVID L. CRIBBS* and THOMAS C. KAUFMAN Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, and Programs in Genetics and Cellular, Molecular, and Developmental Biology, Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, U.S.A. * Present address: Centre de Recherche de Biochimie et Genetique Cellulaires, 118, route de Narbonne 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France Summary The extraordinary positional conservation of the hom- minigene expresses pb protein in only a subset of pb's eotic genes within the Antennapedia and the Bithorax normal domains of expression. Therefore, the biological Complexes (ANT-C and BX-C) in Drosophila melanogas- significance of the excluded expression pattern elements ter and the murine Hox and human HOX clusters of remains unclear except to note they appear unnecessary genes can be interpreted as a reflection of functional for specifying normal labial identity. Additionally, by necessity. The homeotic gene proboscipedia (pb) resides using reporter gene constructs inserted into the Dros- within the ANT-C, and its sequence is related to that of ophila genome and by comparing /^-associated genomic Hox-1.5. We show that two independent pb minigene sequences from two divergent species, we have located P-element insertion lines completely rescue the labial m-acting regulatory elements required for pb expression palp-to-first leg homeotic transformation caused by pb in embryos and larvae. null mutations; thus, a homeotic gene of the ANT-C can properly carry out its homeotic function outside of the Key words: proboscipedia, homeotic gene, Antennapedia complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeobox Genes in Mammary Gland Development and Neoplasia Michael T Lewis University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
    http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/2/3/158 Review Homeobox genes in mammary gland development and neoplasia Michael T Lewis University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA Received: 2 December 1999 Breast Cancer Res 2000, 2:158–169 Revisions requested: 12 January 2000 The electronic version of this article can be found online at Revisions received: 25 January 2000 http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/2/3/158 Accepted: 4 February 2000 Published: 25 February 2000 © Current Science Ltd Abstract Both normal development and neoplastic progression involve cellular transitions from one physiological state to another. Whereas much is being discovered about signal transduction networks involved in regulating these transitions, little progress has been made in identifying the higher order genetic determinants that establish and maintain mammary cell identity and dictate cell type-specific responses to mammotropic signals. Homeobox genes are a large superfamily of genes whose members function in establishing and maintaining cell fate and cell identity throughout embryonic development. Recent genetic and expression analyses strongly suggest that homeobox genes may perform similar functions at specific developmental transition points in the mammary gland. These analyses also suggest that homeobox genes may play a contributory or causal role in breast cancer. Keywords: breast cancer, embryogenesis, homeodomain, HOX genes, organogenesis Introduction higher order genetic determinants of cell identity that The mammary gland is a remarkable organ with respect to dictate cell type specific responses are largely unknown. its development and functional differentiation. It is also remarkable with respect to the consequences on mam- Among other candidates, one superfamily of genes pre- malian life should development become abnormal, leading sents itself as capable of regulating developmental deci- either to lactational failure or, most importantly, mammary sions during these transitions: the homeobox genes.
    [Show full text]