The Case for Lupus Nephritis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Case for Lupus Nephritis Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Expanding the Role of Complement Therapies: The Case for Lupus Nephritis Nicholas L. Li * , Daniel J. Birmingham and Brad H. Rovin Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; [email protected] (D.J.B.); [email protected] (B.H.R.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-614-293-4997; Fax: +1-614-293-3073 Abstract: The complement system is an innate immune surveillance network that provides defense against microorganisms and clearance of immune complexes and cellular debris and bridges innate and adaptive immunity. In the context of autoimmune disease, activation and dysregulation of complement can lead to uncontrolled inflammation and organ damage, especially to the kidney. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by loss of tolerance, autoantibody production, and immune complex deposition in tissues including the kidney, with inflammatory consequences. Effective clearance of immune complexes and cellular waste by early complement components protects against the development of lupus nephritis, while uncontrolled activation of complement, especially the alternative pathway, promotes kidney damage in SLE. Therefore, complement plays a dual role in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. Improved understanding of the contribution of the various complement pathways to the development of kidney disease in SLE has created an opportunity to target the complement system with novel therapies to improve outcomes in lupus nephritis. In this review, we explore the interactions between complement and the kidney in SLE and their implications for the treatment of lupus nephritis. Keywords: lupus nephritis; complement; systemic lupus erythematosus; glomerulonephritis Citation: Li, N.L.; Birmingham, D.J.; Rovin, B.H. Expanding the Role of Complement Therapies: The Case for Lupus Nephritis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 1. Introduction: The Yin and Yang of Complement Protection Versus Injury 10, 626. https://doi.org/10.3390/ jcm10040626 Complement is a rapid and effective innate immune surveillance system that acts as a defense against bacterial pathogens, eliminates apoptotic cells and cellular debris, Academic Editor: Oliver Gross and bridges the innate and adaptive immune systems. Deficiencies in complement proteins Received: 31 December 2020 predispose to certain infections, for example with encapsulated organisms. Deficiencies in Accepted: 3 February 2021 complement components, especially those that result in accumulation of cellular debris, Published: 7 February 2021 also predispose to autoimmune diseases. Furthermore, to accomplish many of its protec- tive actions, the complement system leverages other components of the immune system Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral and initiates inflammatory responses. To keep inflammation controlled and beneficial, with regard to jurisdictional claims in the complement cascade is tightly regulated. Triggers that upset the balance between published maps and institutional affil- activation and regulation and/or deficiencies in regulatory mechanisms can lead to un- iations. controlled inflammation and organ injury. The kidney often bears the consequences of uncontrolled complement activation, especially in the setting of autoimmune diseases. In this review, we will explore the relationship of complement to kidney injury in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the implications of this relationship for the treatment of Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. lupus nephritis (LN). Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article 2. Complement Activation in Three Easy Steps distributed under the terms and Complement activation occurs via three distinct pathways that eventually merge into a conditions of the Creative Commons final common pathway leading to assembly of the membrane attack complex (MAC). These Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// activation pathways, termed the classical, lectin, and alternative pathways, are altogether creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ composed of greater than 30 soluble and membrane bound proteins (Figure1). Some 4.0/). J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 626. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040626 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 13 J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 626 2 of 13 These activation pathways, termed the classical, lectin, and alternative pathways, are al- together composed of greater than 30 soluble and membrane bound proteins (Figure 1). Someof these of these proteins proteins are zymogens, are zymogens, which which require require cleavage cleavage for activation for activation of their of their enzymatic enzy- maticactivity activity that in that turn in drives turn drives further furthe signalingr signaling down down the complement the complement cascade. cascade. Figure 1. 1. OverviewOverview of ofthe the complement complement activation activation pathways. pathways. MBL, MBL, mannose-binding mannose-binding lectin, lectin, MASP, MASP, MBL-associated MBL-associated serine protease. serine protease. 2.1. The Classical Pathway 2.1. The Classical Pathway The classical complement pathway is activated through the binding of C1q to recog- The classical complement pathway is activated through the binding of C1q to recog- nition surfaces, such as immune complexes or apoptotic debris. This binding induces a nition surfaces, such as immune complexes or apoptotic debris. This binding induces a conformational change and the sequential activation of the associated proteases C1r and conformational change and the sequential activation of the associated proteases C1r and C1s. Once activated, C1s cleaves C4 into C4a and C4b, creating a binding site on C4b for C1s. Once activated, C1s cleaves C4 into C4a and C4b, creating a binding site on C4b for C2. C2 is then cleaved by C1s, releasing C2b and activating a serine protease site on C2a. C2. C2 is then cleaved by C1s, releasing C2b and activating a serine protease site on C2a. This results in a complex, C4b2a, known as the classical C3 convertase, which cleaves C3 intointo C3a C3a and and C3b. C3b. 2.2.2.2. The The Lectin Lectin Pathway Pathway TheThe lectin lectin pathway pathway is is initiated initiated by by a member of the collectin family. These molecules areare similar similar to to C1q C1q but but with with C-terminal C-terminal carb carbohydrateohydrate recognition recognition domains domains (CRDs) (CRDs) and and in- cludeinclude mannose-binding mannose-binding lectin lectin (MBL), (MBL), ficolins, ficolins, and and collectins. collectins. Collectins Collectins bind bind mainly mainly to carbohydratesto carbohydrates found found on onpathogens, pathogens, such such as as D-mannose D-mannose and and N-acetyl N-acetyl glucosamine, throughthrough their their CRDs. CRDs. Once Once bound, bound, collectins collectins un undergodergo conformational conformational changes changes that that activate acti- MBL-associatedvate MBL-associated serine serine proteases proteases (MASPs) (MASPs) in a manner in a manner analogous analogous to C1r and to C1r C1s and activa- C1s tion.activation. Activated Activated MASPs MASPs can cleave can cleave C4 and C4 C2, and fo C2,rming forming the same the sameC3 convertase C3 convertase as the as clas- the sicalclassical pathway. pathway. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 626 3 of 13 2.3. The Alternative Pathway In contrast to the classical and lectin pathways, the alternative pathway is activated via a unique mechanism of spontaneous and continuous hydrolysis of C3, a process known as tickover. Hydrolyzed C3, termed C3H20, is able to bind complement factor B (fB), which then is cleaved by the serine protease complement factor D (fD), exposing an active serine protease site on Bb. The resulting complex, C3H20Bb, which is stabilized by the complement protein properdin, is the initial alternative pathway C3 convertase, capable of cleaving C3 into C3a and C3b. The formed C3b can bind additional fB, which again can be cleaved by fD, forming the major alternative pathway C3 convertase C3bBb. This feedback activity results in an amplification loop, accelerating C3 activation. 2.4. The Final Common Pathway Regardless of the pathway of initiation, the resulting C3 convertases provide binding sites for additional C3b, forming the complexes C4b2a3b (from the classical or lectin path- ways) or C3bBb3b (from the alternative pathway) with specificity for cleavage of C5 into C5a and C5b. When the classical/lectin and alternative pathways are both engaged there is likely more C3bBb3b than C4b2a3b because of the alternative pathway’s amplification loop. C5 cleavage initiates the terminal pathway, where C5b associates with C6 and C7 to form a complex that is capable of inserting into cell membranes via an exposed hydrophobic region on C7. To this membrane bound complex, the addition of C8 and multimers of C9 lead to the formation of the C5b-9 that comprises MAC, which creates pores in the cell membrane causing target cell lysis. 3. Complement and LN 3.1. Complement Protects against Autoimmunity The safe clearance of immune complexes (IC), apoptotic cells, and cellular debris is an important protective function of complement [1]. Cellular debris exposes the host to self-antigens and conceivably may foster autoantibody induction. C1q is a potent opsonin for apoptotic cells and its binding to cellular blebs can activate the classical complement pathway resulting in C3 cleavage. Subsequent recognition of C1q bound to cellular debris by its receptor expressed on phagocytes
Recommended publications
  • 2017 American College of Rheumatology/American Association
    Arthritis Care & Research Vol. 69, No. 8, August 2017, pp 1111–1124 DOI 10.1002/acr.23274 VC 2017, American College of Rheumatology SPECIAL ARTICLE 2017 American College of Rheumatology/ American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Guideline for the Perioperative Management of Antirheumatic Medication in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty SUSAN M. GOODMAN,1 BRYAN SPRINGER,2 GORDON GUYATT,3 MATTHEW P. ABDEL,4 VINOD DASA,5 MICHAEL GEORGE,6 ORA GEWURZ-SINGER,7 JON T. GILES,8 BEVERLY JOHNSON,9 STEVE LEE,10 LISA A. MANDL,1 MICHAEL A. MONT,11 PETER SCULCO,1 SCOTT SPORER,12 LOUIS STRYKER,13 MARAT TURGUNBAEV,14 BARRY BRAUSE,1 ANTONIA F. CHEN,15 JEREMY GILILLAND,16 MARK GOODMAN,17 ARLENE HURLEY-ROSENBLATT,18 KYRIAKOS KIROU,1 ELENA LOSINA,19 RONALD MacKENZIE,1 KALEB MICHAUD,20 TED MIKULS,21 LINDA RUSSELL,1 22 14 23 17 ALEXANDER SAH, AMY S. MILLER, JASVINDER A. SINGH, AND ADOLPH YATES Guidelines and recommendations developed and/or endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) are intended to provide guidance for particular patterns of practice and not to dictate the care of a particular patient. The ACR considers adherence to the recommendations within this guideline to be volun- tary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in light of each patient’s individual circumstances. Guidelines and recommendations are intended to promote benefi- cial or desirable outcomes but cannot guarantee any specific outcome. Guidelines and recommendations developed and endorsed by the ACR are subject to periodic revision as warranted by the evolution of medi- cal knowledge, technology, and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Age Increases Immunosuppression in the Brain and Decreases Immunotherapeutic Efficacy in Subjects with Glioblastoma
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 16, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3874 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. RESEARCH ARTICLE Advanced Age Increases Immunosuppression in the Brain and Decreases Immunotherapeutic Efficacy in Subjects with Glioblastoma Authors: Erik Ladomersky1, Lijie Zhai1, Kristen L. Lauing1, April Bell1, Jiahui Xu2, Masha Kocherginsky2, Bin Zhang3,4, Jennifer D. Wu5, Joseph R. Podojil4, Leonidas C. Platanias3,6, Aaron Y. Mochizuki7, Robert M. Prins8, Priya Kumthekar9, Jeffrey J. Raizer9, Karan Dixit9, Rimas V. Lukas9, Craig Horbinski1,10, Min Wei11, Changyou Zhou11, Graham Pawelec12, Judith Campisi13,14, Ursula Grohmann15, George C. Prendergast16, David H. Munn17, Derek A. Wainwright1,5,7,8 Affiliations: 1Department of Neurological Surgery, 2Department of Preventive Medicine-Biostatistics, 3Department of Medicine-Hematology/Oncology, 4Department of Microbiology- Immunology, 5Department of Urology, 6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, 9Department of Neurology, 10Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA. 7Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA. 8Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA. 11BeiGene, Zhong-Guan-Cun Life Science Park, Changping District, Beijing, China. 12Department of Immunology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 13Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, USA. 14Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. 15Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. 16Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, PA, USA. 17Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, GA, USA. Running Title: Aging and brain immunosuppression of GBM immunity Keywords: Senescence, neuroimmunology, immunotherapy, brain tumor, IDO COI: Min Wei and Changyou Zhou possess financial interests and are paid employees of BeiGene, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Complement Deficiencies Really Rare?
    G Model MIMM-4432; No. of Pages 8 ARTICLE IN PRESS Molecular Immunology xxx (2014) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Immunology j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/molimm Review Are complement deficiencies really rare? Overview on prevalence, ଝ clinical importance and modern diagnostic approach a,∗ b Anete Sevciovic Grumach , Michael Kirschfink a Faculty of Medicine ABC, Santo Andre, SP, Brazil b Institute of Immunology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany a r a t b i c s t l e i n f o r a c t Article history: Complement deficiencies comprise between 1 and 10% of all primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) accord- Received 29 May 2014 ing to national and supranational registries. They are still considered rare and even of less clinical Received in revised form 18 June 2014 importance. This not only reflects (as in all PIDs) a great lack of awareness among clinicians and gen- Accepted 23 June 2014 eral practitioners but is also due to the fact that only few centers worldwide provide a comprehensive Available online xxx laboratory complement analysis. To enable early identification, our aim is to present warning signs for complement deficiencies and recommendations for diagnostic approach. The genetic deficiency of any Keywords: early component of the classical pathway (C1q, C1r/s, C2, C4) is often associated with autoimmune dis- Complement deficiencies eases whereas individuals, deficient of properdin or of the terminal pathway components (C5 to C9), are Warning signs Prevalence highly susceptible to meningococcal disease. Deficiency of C1 Inhibitor (hereditary angioedema, HAE) Meningitis results in episodic angioedema, which in a considerable number of patients with identical symptoms Infections also occurs in factor XII mutations.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Immunosuppression by Therapy‐Exposed Glioblastoma
    IJC International Journal of Cancer Enhanced immunosuppression by therapy-exposed glioblastoma multiforme tumor cells Astrid Authier1, Kathryn J. Farrand1, Kate W.R. Broadley1, Lindsay R. Ancelet1, Martin K. Hunn1,2, Sarrabeth Stone2, Melanie J. McConnell2 and Ian F. Hermans1,2 1 Vaccine Research Group, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington 6242, New Zealand 2 School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6012, New Zealand Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly malignant brain tumor with an extremely short time to relapse following standard treatment. Since recurrent GBM is often resistant to subsequent radiotherapy and chemotherapy, immunotherapy has been proposed as an alternative treatment option. Although it is well established that GBM induces immune suppression, it is cur- rently unclear what impact prior conventional therapy has on the ability of GBM cells to modulate the immune environment. In this study, we investigated the interaction between immune cells and glioma cells that had been exposed to chemotherapy or irradiation in vitro. We demonstrate that treated glioma cells are more immunosuppressive than untreated cells and form tumors at a faster rate in vivo in an animal model. Cultured supernatant from in vitro-treated primary human GBM cells were also shown to increase suppression, which was independent of accessory suppressor cells or T regulatory cell generation, and could act directly on CD41 and CD81 T cell proliferation. While a number of key immunosuppressive cytokines were overex- pressed in the treated cells, including IL-10, IL-6 and GM-CSF, suppression could be alleviated in a number of treated GBM lines by inhibition of prostaglandin E2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Chapter 1
    Chapter 1 General introduction Chapter 1 1.1 Overview of the complement system 1.2 Complement activation pathways 1.2.1 The lectin pathway of complement activation 1.2.2 The alternative pathway of complement activation 1.2.3 The classical pathway of complement activation 1.2.4 The terminal complement pathway 1.3 Regulators and modulators of the complement system 1.4 The evolution of the complement system 1.4.1 Findings in nature 1.4.2 Protein families 1.5 The ancient complement system 1.6 Can complement deficiencies clarify complement function? 1.7 Introduction to this thesis 10 INTRODUCTION: THE COMPLEMENT SYSTESYSTEMM IN HISTORICAL PERSPERSPECTIVEPECTIVE Abbreviations AP : alternative complement pathway C1-INH : C1 esterase inhibitor CP : classical complement pathway CR1 : complement receptor 1 (CD35) CRP : C-reactive protein DAF : decay-accelerating factor (CD55) Ig : immunoglobulin LP : lectin complement pathway MBL : mannose-binding lectin MCP : membrane cofactor protein (CD46) MHC : major histocompatibility complex RCA : regulators of complement activation SLE : systemic lupus erythomatosus Classification of species or phyla in evolution Agnatha : jawless vertebrates like hagfish and lamprey Ascidian: : belongs to the subphylum urochordata Chordata: : phylum comprising urochordata, cephalochordata and vertebrata Cyclostome : e.g. lamprey Deuterostome : comprises two major phyla, the chordata (including mammals) and the echinodermata Echinodermata : (ekhinos = sea urchin, derma = skin) phylum including sea urchins, sea stars, and seacucumbers Invertebrates : echinoderms, and protochordates like Clavelina picta and the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi Teleost fish : bony fish like trout, sand bass, and puffer fish Tunicate : belongs to the phylum of the urochordata Urochordata : subphylum Vertebrates : classified in jawless (Agnatha) or jawed species THE COMPLEMENT SYSTESYSTEMM 1.1 Overview of the complement system (Fig.(Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunosuppression
    Provided by NaTHNaC https://travelhealthpro.org.uk Printed:28 Sep 2021 Immunosuppression Information on pre-travel preparation, tips to stay healthy abroad and links to useful resources for immunosuppressed travellers Key Messages Pre-travel planning is essential; immunosuppressed individuals should discuss their travel plans carefully with their hospital specialist and GP, ideally before booking travel. Pre-travel planning is essential; immunosuppressed individuals should discuss their travel plans carefully with their hospital specialist and GP, ideally before booking travel. All travellers should obtain comprehensive travel health insurance; immunosuppressed travellers should declare their full medical history to the insurers. Immunosuppressed travellers are more likely to experience severe illness as a result of certain infections and extra precautions are recommended. They are also potentially at risk of a deterioration or exacerbation of their condition. The risk may differ depending on the traveller’s degree of immune suppression. Travellers who are immunosuppressed should be stable, know how to manage their condition, be prepared to manage minor illnesses, and know when and how to seek medical advice abroad. Additional vaccines may be recommended for immunosuppressed individuals. Those who are severely immunosuppressed will not be able to have live vaccinations. Inactivated vaccines can be given safely, but may be less effective. Specific guidelines are available for immunosuppressed children. Overview Immunosuppression is the suppression of the body’s normal immune response. This causes a reduced ability to fight infection. Immunosuppression can be caused by a variety of medical conditions, drugs or treatments. Risk management advice for the immunosuppressed traveller should follow that of the general traveller and be tailored as outlined below.
    [Show full text]
  • Instant Notes: Immunology, Second Edition
    Immunology Second Edition The INSTANT NOTES series Series Editor: B.D. Hames School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK Animal Biology 2nd edition Biochemistry 2nd edition Bioinformatics Chemistry for Biologists 2nd edition Developmental Biology Ecology 2nd edition Immunology 2nd edition Genetics 2nd edition Microbiology 2nd edition Molecular Biology 2nd edition Neuroscience Plant Biology Chemistry series Consulting Editor: Howard Stanbury Analytical Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry 2nd edition Medicinal Chemistry Organic Chemistry 2nd edition Physical Chemistry Psychology series Sub-series Editor: Hugh Wagner Dept of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK Psychology Cognitive Psychology Forthcoming title Physiological Psychology Immunology Second Edition P.M. Lydyard Department of Immunology and Molecular Pathology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London, UK A. Whelan Department of Immunology, Trinity College and St James’ Hospital, Dublin, Ireland and M.W. Fanger Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA © Garland Science/BIOS Scientific Publishers Limited, 2004 First published 2000 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Second edition published 2004 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or
    [Show full text]
  • Ability of CR1-Deficient Erythrocytes This Information Is Current As of October 3, 2021
    A Soluble Recombinant Multimeric Anti-Rh(D) Single-Chain Fv/CR1 Molecule Restores the Immune Complex Binding Ability of CR1-Deficient Erythrocytes This information is current as of October 3, 2021. S. Oudin, M. Tonye Libyh, D. Goossens, X. Dervillez, F. Philbert, B. Réveil, F. Bougy, T. Tabary, P. Rouger, D. Klatzmann and J. H. M. Cohen J Immunol 2000; 164:1505-1513; ; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.3.1505 Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/content/164/3/1505 References This article cites 54 articles, 25 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/164/3/1505.full#ref-list-1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists by guest on October 3, 2021 • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. A Soluble Recombinant Multimeric Anti-Rh(D) Single-Chain Fv/CR1 Molecule Restores the Immune Complex Binding Ability of CR1-Deficient Erythrocytes S.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Parameter for the Diagnosis and Management of Primary Immunodeficiency
    Practice parameter Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD, David A. Khan, MD, Zuhair K. Ballas, MD, Javier Chinen, MD, PhD, Michael M. Frank, MD, Joyce T. Hsu, MD, Michael Keller, MD, Lisa J. Kobrynski, MD, Hirsh D. Komarow, MD, Bruce Mazer, MD, Robert P. Nelson, Jr, MD, Jordan S. Orange, MD, PhD, John M. Routes, MD, William T. Shearer, MD, PhD, Ricardo U. Sorensen, MD, James W. Verbsky, MD, PhD, David I. Bernstein, MD, Joann Blessing-Moore, MD, David Lang, MD, Richard A. Nicklas, MD, John Oppenheimer, MD, Jay M. Portnoy, MD, Christopher R. Randolph, MD, Diane Schuller, MD, Sheldon L. Spector, MD, Stephen Tilles, MD, Dana Wallace, MD Chief Editor: Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD Co-Editor: David A. Khan, MD Members of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters: David I. Bernstein, MD, Joann Blessing-Moore, MD, David Khan, MD, David Lang, MD, Richard A. Nicklas, MD, John Oppenheimer, MD, Jay M. Portnoy, MD, Christopher R. Randolph, MD, Diane Schuller, MD, Sheldon L. Spector, MD, Stephen Tilles, MD, Dana Wallace, MD Primary Immunodeficiency Workgroup: Chairman: Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD Members: Zuhair K. Ballas, MD, Javier Chinen, MD, PhD, Michael M. Frank, MD, Joyce T. Hsu, MD, Michael Keller, MD, Lisa J. Kobrynski, MD, Hirsh D. Komarow, MD, Bruce Mazer, MD, Robert P. Nelson, Jr, MD, Jordan S. Orange, MD, PhD, John M. Routes, MD, William T. Shearer, MD, PhD, Ricardo U. Sorensen, MD, James W. Verbsky, MD, PhD GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Aerocrine; has received payment for lectures from Genentech/ These parameters were developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck; and has received research support from Genentech/ the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; the American College of Novartis and Merck.
    [Show full text]
  • Complement Herbert L
    Host Defense 2011 Complement Herbert L. Mathews, Ph.D. COMPLEMENT Date: 4/11/11 Reading Assignment: Janeway’s Immunobiology, 7th Edition, pp. 54-55, 61-82, 406- 409, 514-515. Figures: (Unless otherwise noted) Janeway’s Immunobiology, 7th Edition, Murphy et al., Garland Publishing. KEY CONCEPTS AND LEARNING OBJECTIVES You will be able to describe the mechanism and consequences of the activation of the complement system. To attain the goals for these lectures you will be able to: a. List the components of the complement system. b. Describe the three activation pathways for complement. c. Explain the consequences of complement activation. d. Describe the consequence of complement deficiency. Page 1 Host Defense 2011 Complement Herbert L. Mathews, Ph.D. CONTENT SUMMARY Introduction Nomenclature Activation of Complement The classical pathway The mannan-binding lectin pathway The alternative pathway Biological Consequence of Complement Activation Cell lysis and viral neutralization Opsonization Clearance of Immune Complexes Inflammation Regulation of Complement Activation Human Complement Component Deficiencies Page 2 Host Defense 2011 Complement Herbert L. Mathews, Ph.D. Introduction The complement system is a group of more than 30 plasma and membrane proteins that play a critical role in host defense. When activated, complement components interact in a highly regulated fashion to generate products that: Recruit inflammatory cells (promoting inflammation). Opsonize microbial pathogens and immune complexes (facilitating antigen clearance). Kill microbial pathogens (via a lytic mechanism known as the membrane attack complex). Generate an inflammatory response. Complement activation takes place on antigenic surfaces. However, the activation of complement generates several soluble fragments that have important biologic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders
    ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY 00954543 /98 $8.00 + .OO PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCY DISORDERS Robert J. Mamlok, MD Immunodeficiency is a common thought among both patients and physicians when confronted with what is perceived as an excessive num- ber, duration, or severity of infections. Because of this, the starting point for evaluating patients for suspected immunodeficiency is based on what constitutes ”too many infections.” It generally is agreed that children with normal immune systems may have an average of 6 to 8 respiratory tract infections per year for the first decade of life. Even after a pattern of ab- normal infection is established, questions of secondary immunodeficiency should first be raised. The relatively uncommon primary immunodefi- ciency diseases are statistically dwarfed by secondary causes of recurrent infection, such as malnutrition, respiratory allergy, chronic cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal disease, and environmental factors. On the other hand, a dizzying spiral of progress in our understanding of the genetics and immunology of primary immunodeficiency disease has resulted in improved diagnostic and therapeutic tools. Twenty-five newly recognized immunologic disease genes have been cloned in the last 5 ~ears.2~It has become arguably more important than ever for us to recognize the clinical and laboratory features of these relatively uncommon, but increasingly treatable, disorders. CLASSIFICATION The immune system has been classically divided into four separate arms: The B-cell system responsible for antibody formation, the T-cell sys- From the Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Texas Tech University Health Sci- ences Center, Lubbock, Texas PRIMARY CARE VOLUME 25 NUMBER 4 DECEMBER 1998 739 740 MAMLOK tem responsible for immune cellular regulation, the phagocytic (poly- morphonuclear and mononuclear) system and the complement (opsonic) system.
    [Show full text]
  • Ic3b Catalog Number: A115 Sizes Available: 250 Μg/Vial Concentration
    Name: iC3b Catalog Number: A115 Sizes Available: 250 µg/vial Concentration: 1.0 mg/mL (see Certificate of Analysis for actual concentration) Form: Frozen liquid Purity: >90% by SDS-PAGE Buffer: 10 mM sodium phosphate, 145 mM NaCl, pH 7.2 Extinction Coeff. A280 nm = 1.03 at 1.0 mg/mL Molecular Weight: 176,000 Da (3 chains) Preservative: None, 0.22 µm filtered Storage: -70oC or below. Avoid freeze/thaw. Source: Normal human serum (shown by certified tests to be negative for HBsAg and for antibodies to HCV, HIV-1 and HIV-II). Precautions: Use normal precautions for handling human blood products. Origin: Manufactured in the USA. General Description iC3b (inactivated C3b) is derived from C3b. Conversion of C3b to iC3b destroys almost all of the functional binding sites present on C3b. C3b itself is produced by all three pathways of complement (Law, S.K.A. and Reid, K.B.M. (1995)) when native C3 is cleaved releasing C3a. iC3b is prepared by cleavage of C3b by factor I in the presence of factor H. Cleavage by factors H and I occurs rapidly when the C3b is free in solution and is slower when it is attached to a surface. Other cofactors for factor I also permit cleavage if C3b to iC3b and these include the two membrane proteins CR1 (CD35) and MCP (CD46). Factor I can cleave C3b in two places in the alpha chain and if both sites are cleaved a small fragment (C3f, 2,000 Da) is released. If the C3b precursor was attached to a surface, the iC3b remains on that surface.
    [Show full text]