DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of the Usefulness and Availability of Nasa's Earth And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of the Usefulness and Availability of Nasa's Earth And ASSESSMENT OF THE USEFULNESS AND AVAILABILITY OF NASA’S EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE MISSION DATA SPACE STUDIES BOARD BOARD ON EARTH SCIENCES AND RESOURCES NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL Other Reports of the Space Studies Board Toward New Partnerships: Government, the Private Sector, and Earth Science Research (2002) The Quarantine and Certification of Martian Samples (2001) U.S. Astronomy and Astrophysics: Managing an Integrated Program (2001) Readiness Issues Related to Research in the Biological and Physical Sciences on the International Space Station (2001) “The Next Generation Space Telescope” (2001) Assessment of Mars Science and Mission Priorities (2001) The Mission of Microgravity and Physical Sciences Research at NASA (2001) Transforming Remote Sensing Data into Information and Applications (2001) Signs of Life: A Report Based on the April 2000 Workshop on Life Detection Techniques (2001) Assessment of Mission Size Trade-offs for Earth and Space Science Missions (2000) “Assessment of NASA’s Office of Space Science Strategic Plan 2000” (2000) “Assessment of Scientific Aspects of the Triana Mission” (2000) “Continuing Assessment of Technology Development in NASA’s Office of Space Science” (2000) Ensuring the Climate Record from the NPP and NPOESS Meteorological Satellites (2000) Future Biotechnology Research on the International Space Station (2000) Issues in the Integration of Research and Operational Satellites for Climate Research: I. Science and Design (2000) Microgravity Research in Support of Technologies for the Human Exploration and Development of Space and Planetary Bodies (2000) Preventing the Forward Contamination of Europa (2000) Review of NASA’s Biomedical Research Program (2000) Review of NASA’s Earth Science Enterprise Research Strategy for 2000-2010 (2000) The Role of Small Satellites in NASA and NOAA Earth Observation Programs (2000) “Assessment of NASA’s Plans for Post-2002 Earth Observing Missions” (1999) Institutional Arrangements for Space Station Research (1999) Radiation and the International Space Station: Recommendations to Reduce Risk (1999) A Science Strategy for the Exploration of Europa (1999) A Scientific Rationale for Mobility in Planetary Environments (1999) Size Limits of Very Small Microorganisms: Proceedings of a Workshop (1999) U.S.-European-Japanese Workshop on Space Cooperation: Summary Report (1999) Assessment of Technology Development in NASA’s Office of Space Science (1998) Development and Application of Small Spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radars (1998) Evaluating the Biological Potential in Samples Returned from Planetary Satellites and Small Solar System Bodies: Framework for Decision Making (1998) The Exploration of Near-Earth Objects (1998) Exploring the Trans-Neptunian Solar System (1998) Failed Stars and Super Planets: A Report Based on the January 1998 Workshop on Substellar-Mass Objects (1998) Ground-based Solar Research: An Assessment and Strategy for the Future (1998) Readiness for the Upcoming Solar Maximum (1998) A Strategy for Research in Space Biology and Medicine in the New Century (1998) Supporting Research and Data Analysis in NASA’s Science Programs: Engines for Innovation and Synthesis (1998) U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science (1998) Copies of these reports are available free of charge from: Space Studies Board National Research Council 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418 (202) 334-3477 [email protected] www.nationalacademies.org/ssb/ssb.html Assessment of the Usefulness and Availability of NASA’s Earth and Space Science Mission Data Task Group on the Usefulness and Availability of NASA’s Space Mission Data Space Studies Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences Board on Earth Sciences and Resources Division on Earth and Life Studies National Research Council NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the task group responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study was supported by Contract NASW 96013 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project. Copies of this report are available free of charge from: Space Studies Board National Research Council 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20418 Copyright 2002 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Wm. A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. Wm A. Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council. TASK GROUP ON THE USEFULNESS AND AVAILABILITY OF NASA’S SPACE MISSION DATA SIDNEY C. WOLFF, National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, Chair THOMAS A. HERRING, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Vice-Chair JOEL BREGMAN, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MICHAEL J. FOLK, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign RICHARD G. KRON, University of Chicago JAMES F.W. PURDOM, Colorado State University DONNA L. SHIRLEY, University of Oklahoma, Norman WALTER H.F. SMITH, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NICK VAN DRIEL, U.S. Geological Survey/EROS Data Center DONALD J. WILLIAMS, Johns Hopkins University ROGER V. YELLE, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff JAMES R. ZIMBELMAN, Smithsonian Institution National Research Council Staff ANNE M. LINN, Study Director MONICA R. LIPSCOMB, Assistant Program Officer JOSEPH K. ALEXANDER, Director, Space Studies Board ANTHONY R. DE SOUZA, Director, Board on Earth Sciences and Resources CLAUDETTE BAYLOR-FLEMING, Senior Program Assistant EDMUND M. REEVES, Consultant iv SPACE STUDIES BOARD JOHN H. McELROY, University of Texas at Arlington (retired), Chair ROGER P. ANGEL, University of Arizona JAMES P. BAGIAN, National Center for Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration JAMES L. BURCH, Southwest Research Institute RADFORD BYERLY, JR., Boulder, Colorado ROBERT E. CLELAND, University of Washington HOWARD M. EINSPAHR, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute STEVEN H. FLAJSER, Loral Space and Communications Ltd. MICHAEL H. FREILICH, Oregon State University DON P. GIDDENS, Georgia Institute of Technology/Emory University RALPH H. JACOBSON, The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory (retired) CONWAY LEOVY, University of Washington JONATHAN I. LUNINE, University of Arizona BRUCE D. MARCUS, TRW, Inc. (retired) RICHARD A. McCRAY, University of Colorado HARRY Y. McSWEEN, JR., University of Tennessee GARY J. OLSEN, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign GEORGE A. PAULIKAS, The Aerospace Corporation (retired) ROBERT J. SERAFIN, National Center for Atmospheric Research EUGENE B. SKOLNIKOFF, Massachusetts Institute of Technology MITCHELL SOGIN, Marine Biological Laboratory C. MEGAN URRY, Yale University PETER W. VOORHEES, Northwestern University JOSEPH K. ALEXANDER, Director v BOARD ON EARTH
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using Earth Observation Data to Improve Health in the United States Accomplishments and Future Challenges
    a report of the csis technology and public policy program Using Earth Observation Data to Improve Health in the United States accomplishments and future challenges 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Author E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org Lyn D. Wigbels September 2011 ISBN 978-0-89206-668-1 Ë|xHSKITCy066681zv*:+:!:+:! a report of the csis technology and public policy program Using Earth Observation Data to Improve Health in the United States accomplishments and future challenges Author Lyn D. Wigbels September 2011 About CSIS At a time of new global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to decisionmakers in government, international institutions, the private sector, and civil society. A bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., CSIS conducts research and analysis and devel- ops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways for America to sustain its prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent international policy institutions, with more than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focused on defense and security, regional stability, and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global development and economic integration. Former U.S. senator Sam Nunn became chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees in 1999, and John J.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Iowa Instruments in Space
    University of Iowa Instruments in Space A-D13-089-5 Wind Van Allen Probes Cluster Mercury Earth Venus Mars Express HaloSat MMS Geotail Mars Voyager 2 Neptune Uranus Juno Pluto Jupiter Saturn Voyager 1 Spaceflight instruments designed and built at the University of Iowa in the Department of Physics & Astronomy (1958-2019) Explorer 1 1958 Feb. 1 OGO 4 1967 July 28 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Launch Date Launch Date Launch Date Spacecraft Spacecraft Spacecraft Explorer 3 (U1T9)58 Mar. 26 Injun 5 1(U9T68) Aug. 8 (UT) ExpEloxrpelro r1e r 4 1915985 8F eJbu.l y1 26 OEGxOpl o4rer 41 (IMP-5) 19697 Juunlye 2 281 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Explorer 2 (launch failure) 1958 Mar. 5 OGO 5 1968 Mar. 4 Van Allen Probe A * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 3er 1 1915985 8M Oarc. t2. 611 InEjuxnp lo5rer 45 (SSS) 197618 NAouvg.. 186 Van Allen Probe B * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 4er 2 1915985 8Ju Nlyo 2v.6 8 EUxpKlo 4r e(rA 4ri1el -(4IM) P-5) 197619 DJuenc.e 1 211 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 1 * 2015 Mar. 12 ExpPloiorenre 5e r 3 (launch failure) 1915985 8A uDge.c 2. 46 EPxpiolonreeerr 4130 (IMP- 6) 19721 Maarr.. 313 HMEaRgCnIe CtousbpeShaetr i(cF oMxu-1ltDis scaatelell itMe)i ssion / 2 * 2021081 J5a nM. a1r2. 12 PionPeioenr e1er 4 1915985 9O cMt.a 1r.1 3 EExpxlpolorerer r4 457 ( S(IMSSP)-7) 19721 SNeopvt.. 1263 HMaalogSnaett oCsupbhee Sriact eMlluitlet i*scale Mission / 3 * 2021081 M5a My a2r1. 12 Pioneer 2 1958 Nov. 8 UK 4 (Ariel-4) 1971 Dec. 11 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 4 * 2015 Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Gale to Hurricane Force Winds Using the Satellite Altimeter
    VOLUME 28 JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY APRIL 2011 Estimating Gale to Hurricane Force Winds Using the Satellite Altimeter YVES QUILFEN Space Oceanography Laboratory, IFREMER, Plouzane´, France DOUG VANDEMARK Ocean Process Analysis Laboratory, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire BERTRAND CHAPRON Space Oceanography Laboratory, IFREMER, Plouzane´, France HUI FENG Ocean Process Analysis Laboratory, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire JOE SIENKIEWICZ Ocean Prediction Center, NCEP/NOAA, Camp Springs, Maryland (Manuscript received 21 September 2010, in final form 29 November 2010) ABSTRACT A new model is provided for estimating maritime near-surface wind speeds (U10) from satellite altimeter backscatter data during high wind conditions. The model is built using coincident satellite scatterometer and altimeter observations obtained from QuikSCAT and Jason satellite orbit crossovers in 2008 and 2009. The new wind measurements are linear with inverse radar backscatter levels, a result close to the earlier altimeter high wind speed model of Young (1993). By design, the model only applies for wind speeds above 18 m s21. Above this level, standard altimeter wind speed algorithms are not reliable and typically underestimate the true value. Simple rules for applying the new model to the present-day suite of satellite altimeters (Jason-1, Jason-2, and Envisat RA-2) are provided, with a key objective being provision of enhanced data for near-real- time forecast and warning applications surrounding gale to hurricane force wind events. Model limitations and strengths are discussed and highlight the valuable 5-km spatial resolution sea state and wind speed al- timeter information that can complement other data sources included in forecast guidance and air–sea in- teraction studies.
    [Show full text]
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect
    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) NASA Technical Memorandum 85094 SOLAR RADIO BURST AND IN SITU DETERMINATION OF INTERPLANETARY ELECTRON DENSITY (NASA-^'M-85094) SOLAR RADIO BUFST AND IN N83-35989 SITU DETERMINATION OF INTEFPIAKETARY ELECTRON DENSITY SNASA) 26 p EC A03/MF A01 CSCL 03B Unclas G3/9.3 492134 J. L. Bougeret, J. H. King and R. Schwenn OCT Y'183 RECEIVED NASA Sri FACIUTY ACCESS DEPT. September 1883 I 3 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Spne Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 k it R ^ f A SOLAR RADIO BURST AND IN SITU DETERMINATION OF INTERPLANETARY ELECTRON DENSITY J.-L. Bou eret * J.H. Kinr ^i Laboratory for Extraterrestrial Physics, NASA/Goddard Space Flight. Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, U.S.A. and R. Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut fOr Aeronomie, Postfach 20, D-3411 Katlenburg-Lindau, Federal Republic of Germany - 2 - °t i t: ABSTRACT i • We review and discuss a few interplanetary electron density scales which have been derived from the analysis of interplanetary solar radio bursts, and we compare them to a model derived from 1974-1980 Helioi 1 and 2 in situ i i density observations made in the 0.3-1.0 AU range.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS)
    Importance and Incorporation of User Feedback in Data Stewardship Hampapuram Ramapriyan1,2 and Jeanne Behnke1 1Goddard Space Flight Center, 2Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Presented at SciDataCon 2018, Gaborone, Botswana, Nov. 5-8, 2018 1 Introduction Data stewardship - A long-term responsibility Long-lived systems must evolve On-Going user feedback is critical for understanding needs and evolving as needs change We illustrate this through NASA’s Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) 2 NASA’s Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) • Managed by NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS) Project • Implements NASA’s free and open data policy in effect since early 1990s • Provides end-to-end capabilities for managing NASA’s Earth science data. Science Operations Science data processing Data management Interoperable distributed data archives On-line data access services Earth science discipline-oriented user services 3 Missions, Datasets and Disciplines Started in the 1990s, EOSDIS today archives and distributes over 11,000 data types • Atmosphere » Winds & Precipitation » Aerosols & Clouds » Temperature & Humidity » Solar radiation • Ocean » Surface temperature » Surface wind fields & Heat flux » Surface topography • Land • Human Dimensions » Ocean color » Cover & Usage » Population & Land Use • Cryosphere » Soil Moisture » Human & Environmental » Sea/Land Ice & Snow » Topography & elevation Health Cover » Temperature Distributed Active Archive Centers (DAACs) Alaska Satellite
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Venus Missions
    Appendix 1: Venus Missions Sputnik 7 (USSR) Launch 02/04/1961 First attempted Venus atmosphere craft; upper stage failed to leave Earth orbit Venera 1 (USSR) Launch 02/12/1961 First attempted flyby; contact lost en route Mariner 1 (US) Launch 07/22/1961 Attempted flyby; launch failure Sputnik 19 (USSR) Launch 08/25/1962 Attempted flyby, stranded in Earth orbit Mariner 2 (US) Launch 08/27/1962 First successful Venus flyby Sputnik 20 (USSR) Launch 09/01/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Sputnik 21 (USSR) Launch 09/12/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Cosmos 21 (USSR) Launch 11/11/1963 Possible Venera engineering test flight or attempted flyby Venera 1964A (USSR) Launch 02/19/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Venera 1964B (USSR) Launch 03/01/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Cosmos 27 (USSR) Launch 03/27/1964 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Zond 1 (USSR) Launch 04/02/1964 Venus flyby, contact lost May 14; flyby July 14 Venera 2 (USSR) Launch 11/12/1965 Venus flyby, contact lost en route Venera 3 (USSR) Launch 11/16/1965 Venus lander, contact lost en route, first Venus impact March 1, 1966 Cosmos 96 (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Possible attempted landing, craft fragmented in Earth orbit Venera 1965A (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Flyby attempt (launch failure) Venera 4 (USSR) Launch 06/12/1967 Successful atmospheric probe, arrived at Venus 10/18/1967 Mariner 5 (US) Launch 06/14/1967 Successful flyby 10/19/1967 Cosmos 167 (USSR) Launch 06/17/1967 Attempted atmospheric probe, stranded in Earth orbit Venera 5 (USSR) Launch 01/05/1969 Returned atmospheric data for 53 min on 05/16/1969 M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Van Allen Probes' Contribution to the Space Weather System
    L. J. Zanetti et al. The Van Allen Probes’ Contribution to the Space Weather System Lawrence J. Zanetti, Ramona L. Kessel, Barry H. Mauk, Aleksandr Y. Ukhorskiy, Nicola J. Fox, Robin J. Barnes, Michele Weiss, Thomas S. Sotirelis, and NourEddine Raouafi ABSTRACT The Van Allen Probes mission, formerly the Radiation Belt Storm Probes mission, was renamed soon after launch to honor the late James Van Allen, who discovered Earth’s radiation belts at the beginning of the space age. While most of the science data are telemetered to the ground using a store-and-then-dump schedule, some of the space weather data are broadcast continu- ously when the Probes are not sending down the science data (approximately 90% of the time). This space weather data set is captured by contributed ground stations around the world (pres- ently Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute and the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Czech Republic), automatically sent to the ground facility at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Phys- ics Laboratory, converted to scientific units, and published online in the form of digital data and plots—all within less than 15 minutes from the time that the data are accumulated onboard the Probes. The real-time Van Allen Probes space weather information is publicly accessible via the Van Allen Probes Gateway web interface. INTRODUCTION The overarching goal of the study of space weather ing radiation, were the impetus for implementing a space is to understand and address the issues caused by solar weather broadcast capability on NASA’s Van Allen disturbances and the effects of those issues on humans Probes’ twin pair of satellites, which were launched in and technological systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Nustar Observatory Guide
    NuSTAR Guest Observer Program NuSTAR Observatory Guide Version 3.2 (June 2016) NuSTAR Science Operations Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA NASA Goddard Spaceflight Center, Greenbelt, MD nustar.caltech.edu heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/nustar/index.html i Revision History Revision Date Editor Comments D1,2,3 2014-08-01 NuSTAR SOC Initial draft 1.0 2014-08-15 NuSTAR GOF Release for AO-1 Addition of more information about CZT 2.0 2014-10-30 NuSTAR SOC detectors in section 3. 3.0 2015-09-24 NuSTAR SOC Update to section 4 for release of AO-2 Update for NuSTARDAS v1.6.0 release 3.1 2016-05-10 NuSTAR SOC (nusplitsc, Section 5) 3.2 2016-06-15 NuSTAR SOC Adjustment to section 9 ii Table of Contents Revision History ......................................................................................................................................................... ii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 NuSTAR Program Organization ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. The NuSTAR observatory .................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 NuSTAR Performance ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jjmonl 1712.Pmd
    alactic Observer John J. McCarthy Observatory G Volume 10, No. 12 December 2017 Holiday Theme Park See page 19 for more information The John J. McCarthy Observatory Galactic Observer New Milford High School Editorial Committee 388 Danbury Road Managing Editor New Milford, CT 06776 Bill Cloutier Phone/Voice: (860) 210-4117 Production & Design Phone/Fax: (860) 354-1595 www.mccarthyobservatory.org Allan Ostergren Website Development JJMO Staff Marc Polansky Technical Support It is through their efforts that the McCarthy Observatory Bob Lambert has established itself as a significant educational and recreational resource within the western Connecticut Dr. Parker Moreland community. Steve Barone Jim Johnstone Colin Campbell Carly KleinStern Dennis Cartolano Bob Lambert Route Mike Chiarella Roger Moore Jeff Chodak Parker Moreland, PhD Bill Cloutier Allan Ostergren Doug Delisle Marc Polansky Cecilia Detrich Joe Privitera Dirk Feather Monty Robson Randy Fender Don Ross Louise Gagnon Gene Schilling John Gebauer Katie Shusdock Elaine Green Paul Woodell Tina Hartzell Amy Ziffer In This Issue "OUT THE WINDOW ON YOUR LEFT"............................... 3 REFERENCES ON DISTANCES ................................................ 18 SINUS IRIDUM ................................................................ 4 INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION/IRIDIUM SATELLITES ............. 18 EXTRAGALACTIC COSMIC RAYS ........................................ 5 SOLAR ACTIVITY ............................................................... 18 EQUATORIAL ICE ON MARS? ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • GST Responses to “Questions to Inform Development of the National Plan”
    GST Responses to “Questions to Inform Development of the National Plan” Name (optional): Dr. Darrel Williams Position (optional): Chief Scientist, (240) 542-1106; [email protected] Institution (optional): Global Science & Technology, Inc. Greenbelt, Maryland 20770 Global Science & Technology, Inc. (GST) is pleased to provide the following answers as a contribution towards OSTP’s effort to develop a national plan for civil Earth observations. In our response we provide information to support three main themes: 1. There is strong science need for high temporal resolution of moderate spatial resolution satellite earth observation that can be achieved with cost effective, innovative new approaches. 2. Operational programs need to be designed to obtain sustained climate data records. Continuity of Earth observations can be achieved through more efficient and economical means. 3. We need programs to address the integration of remotely sensed data with in situ data. GST has carefully considered these important national Earth observation issues over the past few years and has submitted the following RFI responses: The USGS RFI on Landsat Data Continuity Concepts (April 2012), NASA’s Sustainable Land Imaging Architecture RFI (September 2013), and This USGEO RFI (November 2013) relative to OSTP’s efforts to develop a national plan for civil Earth observations. In addition to the above RFI responses, GST led the development of a mature, fully compliant flight mission concept in response to NASA’s Earth Venture-2 RFP in September 2011. Our capacity to address these critical national issues resides in GST’s considerable bench strength in Earth science understanding (Drs. Darrel Williams, DeWayne Cecil, Samuel Goward, and Dixon Butler) and in NASA systems engineering and senior management oversight (Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • Nustar Unveils a Heavily Obscured Low-Luminosity Active Galactic Nucleus in the Luminous Infrared Galaxy Ngc 6286 C
    Draft version October 26, 2015 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 04/17/13 NUSTAR UNVEILS A HEAVILY OBSCURED LOW-LUMINOSITY ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS IN THE LUMINOUS INFRARED GALAXY NGC 6286 C. Ricci1,2,*, et al. Draft version October 26, 2015 ABSTRACT We report on the detection of a heavily obscured Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) in the Lumi- nous Infrared Galaxy (LIRG) NGC 6286, obtained thanks to a 17.5 ks NuSTAR observation of the source, part of our ongoing NuSTAR campaign aimed at observing local U/LIRGs in different merger stages. NGC6286 is clearly detected above 10keV and, by including the quasi-simultaneous Swift/XRT and archival XMM-Newton and Chandra data, we find that the source is heavily obscured 24 −2 [N H ≃ (0.95 − 1.32) × 10 cm ], with a column density consistent with being mildly Compton- −2 thick [CT, log(N H/cm ) ≥ 24]. The AGN in NGC 6286 has a low absorption-corrected luminosity 41 −1 (L2−10 keV ∼ 3 − 20 × 10 ergs ) and contributes .1% to the energetics of the system. Because of its low-luminosity, previous observations carried out in the soft X-ray band (< 10 keV) and in the in- frared excluded the presence of a buried AGN. NGC 6286 has multi-wavelength characteristics typical of objects with the same infrared luminosity and in the same merger stage, which might imply that there is a significant population of obscured low-luminosity AGN in LIRGs that can only be detected by sensitive hard X-ray observations. 1. INTRODUCTION 2012; Schawinski et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Quality Control for Quikscat Near Real-Time Data
    JP4.6 Improved Quality Control for QuikSCAT Near Real-time Data S. Mark Leidner, Ross N. Hoffman, and Mark C. Cerniglia Atmospheric and Environmental Research Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts Abstract errors. We will illustrate the types of errors that occur due to rain contamination and ambiguity removal. SeaWinds on QuikSCAT, launched in June 1999, We will also give examples of how the quality of the provides a new source of surface wind information retrieved winds varies across the satellite track, and over the world’s oceans. This new window on global varies with wind speed. surface vector winds has been a great aid to real- SeaWinds is an active, Ku-band microwave radar time operational users, especially in remote areas operating near ¢¤£¦¥¨§ © and is sensitive to centimeter- of the world. As with in situ observations, the qual- scale or capillary waves on the ocean surface. ity of remotely-sensed geophysical data is closely These waves are usually in equilibrium with the wind. tied to the characteristics of the instrument. But Each radar backscatter observation samples a patch remotely-sensed scatterometer winds also have a of ocean about . The vector wind is re- whole range of additional quality control concerns trieved by combining several backscatter observa- different from those of in situ observation systems. tions made from multiple viewing geometries as the The retrieval of geophysical information from the raw scatterometer passes overhead. The resolution of satellite measurements introduces uncertainties but the retrieved winds is . also produces diagnostics about the reliability of the Backscatter from capillary waves on the ocean retrieved quantities.
    [Show full text]