DOCSLIB.ORG

Sand Trail Busness Park Minor Final Site Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sand Trail Busness Park Minor Final Site Plan MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA { DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF REPORT A. Application Information SAND TRAIL BUSNESS PARK MINOR FINAL SITE PLAN Applicant: 3393 LLC, James McNamara Property Owner: 3393 LLC, James McNamara Agent for the Applicant: Lucido & Associates, Morris Crady County Project Coordinator: Matthew Stahley, Senior Planner Growth Management Director: Paul Schilling Project Number: S261-002 Record Number: DEV2020080003 Report Number: 2021_0518_S261-002_DRT_Staff_Final Submittal Received: 08/14/2020 Transmitted: 08/18/2020 Date of Report: 09/28/2020 Resubmittal Received: 04/01/2021 Transmitted: 04/02/2021 Date of Report: 05/18/2021 This document may be reproduced upon request in an alternative format by contacting the County ADA Coordinator (772) 320-3131, the County Administration Office (772) 288-5400, Florida Relay 711, or by completing our accessibility feedback form at www.martin.fl.us/accessibility-feedback. B. Project description and analysis This is a request for final site plan approval for the proposed development of two (2) industrial flex space buildings totaling approximately 48,455 square feet with associated infrastructure. The approximate 4.76 acre vacant parcel is located on the south side of SW Sand Trail approximately 1400 feet west of SW Armellini Avenue in Palm City. Included in this application is a request for a certificate of public facilities reservation. C. Staff recommendation The specific findings and conclusion of each review agency related to this request are identified in Sections F through T of this report. The current review status for each agency is as follows: Section Division or Department Reviewer Phone Assessment F Comp Planning Review Matthew Stahley 772-320-3047 Non-Comply G Site Design Review Matthew Stahley 772-320-3047 Non-Comply H Community Redevelopment Review Santiago Abasolo 772-288-5485 NA Development Review Staff Report H Commercial Design Review Santiago Abasolo 772-288-5485 NA I Property Mgmt Review Ellen MacArthur 772-221-1334 NA J Environmental Review Todd Warren 772-288-5414 Comply J Landscaping Review Lindy Cerar 772-320-3055 Comply K Transportation Review Lukas Lambert 772-221-2300 Comply L County Surveyor Review Thomas Walker 772-288-5928 NA M Engineering Review Stephanie Piche 772-223-4858 Non-Comply N Addressing Review Emily Kohler 772-288-5692 Comply N Electronic File Submission Review Emily Kohler 772-288-5692 Comply O Wellfield Review James Christ 772-320-3034 Comply O Water and Wastewater Review James Christ 772-320-3034 Non-Comply P Emergency Mgmt Review Sally Waite 772-219 4942 NA P Fire Prevention Review Doug Killane 772-288-5633 Comply Q ADA Review Stephanie Piche 772-223-4858 Non-Comply R School Board Review Kimberly Everman 772-219-1200 NA R Health Review Todd Reinhold 772-221-4090 NA S County Attorney Review Krista Storey 772-288-5923 NA T Adequate Public Facilities Review Matthew Stahley 772-320-3047 Pending D. Review Board action This application complies with the threshold requirement for processing as a minor development. As such, final action on this application will be taken by the Growth Management Director. Pursuant to Sections 10.1.E. and 10.2.B.2., Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2019), it shall at all times be the applicant’s responsibility to demonstrate compliance with the Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP), Land Development Regulations (LDR) and the Code. The applicant is required to re-submit materials in response to the non-compliance findings within this report. Upon receipt, the re-submitted materials will be transmitted for review to the appropriate review agencies and individuals that participate in the County's review process. A revised staff report will be created once the next review cycle has been completed. E. Location and site information Parcel number(s) and address: 143840000035000003 3920 SW SAND TRL Existing Zoning: LI-Limited Industrial Future Land use: Industrial Gross area of site: 4.78 Page 2 of 14 Development Review Staff Report Location Map Site Aerial Page 3 of 14 Development Review Staff Report Zoning Map (LI-Limited Industrial) Future Land Use Map (Industrial) F. Determination of compliance with Comprehensive Growth Management Plan requirements - Growth Management Department Unresolved Issues: Item #1: Generic Comp Plan Compliance This application cannot be deemed to be in compliance with the Martin County Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP) until the issues identified in this report have been satisfactorily resolved. Martin County, Fla., CGMP, § 1.3 Page 4 of 14 Development Review Staff Report G. Determination of compliance with land use, site design standards, zoning, and procedural requirements - Growth Management Department Unresolved Issues: Item #1: The square footages for the sub-categories of pervious and impervious are not adding up to the total pervious and impervious square footages. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: Please revise the sub-categories of pervious and impervious square footages so they add up to the totals. Item #2: The boundary survey and Exhibit A legal description total site area square footage provided is inconsistent with the square footage shown on the site plan. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: Please revise the site plan to be consistent with the boundary survey and Exhibit A legal description. Additional Information: Item #1: Timetable Of Development - Final The timetable of development for final site plans require all permits to be obtained within one year of approval and require all construction to be completed within two years of approval. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR, § 10.2.D.2 And § 5.32 H. Determination of compliance with the urban design and community redevelopment requirements – Community Development Department Commercial Design The proposed development is located within an Industrial designated land use abutting a Minor Collector therefore Article 4, DIVISION – Commercial Design - of the Martin County, Florida, Land Development is not applicable to the project. Community Redevelopment N/A - Staff review for compliance requirements associated with this area of regulations is not applicable to this project as currently proposed. I. Determination of compliance with the property management requirements – Engineering Department N/A - Staff review for compliance requirements associated with this area of regulations is not applicable to this project as currently proposed. J. Determination of compliance with environmental and landscaping requirements - Growth Management Department Page 5 of 14 Development Review Staff Report Environmental Findings of Compliance: The Growth Management Department Environmental Division staff has reviewed the application and finds it in compliance with the applicable land development regulations. The environmental assessment submitted by the applicant shows that no wetlands or upland habitat exist on the property and these findings have been verified by county environmental staff. In addition, the wildlife survey shows that no listed species exist on the property. Therefore, the preservation requirements under Article 4, Division 1 and Article 4, Division 2 of the Land Development Regulations do not apply. Landscaping Findings of Compliance: The Growth Management Department staff has reviewed the application and finds it in compliance with the applicable Land Development Regulations regarding landscaping. The applicant has proposed construction of an industrial flex space complex. The applicant has submitted landscape plans that provide 1.26 acres of landscape area which equates to 26% of the 4.76 acres of development area to document compliance with Section 4.663.A.1., Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2013). Pursuant to this regulation a minimum of 20% of the total development area shall be landscaped. Section 4.663.A.3.b. Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2013) requires that all nonresidential developments provide at least one tree per 2,500 sq. ft. of site area: a total of 83 trees for this project. To demonstrate compliance the applicant has proposed the planting of 83 trees for this 206,346 square-foot site. Section 4.663.A.4.a. Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2013) requires that all nonresidential developments provide a ten-foot wide strip of landscaping around the perimeter of vehicular use areas that includes one tree for every 30 linear feet or one tree for 300 square feet of landscape area (53 trees). To demonstrate compliance the applicant has proposed the planting of 53 trees for this perimeter of 1,583 feet. Section 4.663.A.4.b. Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2013) requires that all nonresidential developments provide one 500-square-foot planting area for every 5,000 feet of vehicular use area. 27,672 square feet will be planted for the 95,565 square feet of vehicular use area. The property borders residential developments along the north, east and south. The northern buffer may be reduced in half because there is 60-foot wide roadway separating the properties. A 15-foot wide buffer (half of a Type 3) is provided in addition to the existing ROW landscape areas. The applicant will provide an opaque 6-foot high fence along the east and south in addition to the vehicular use plantings and a 70-foot wide dry detention pond along the southern property border. There are existing 50-foot wide landscape buffers along the east and south provided by the adjacent multi-family residential community. Alterations cannot be made to the plans after final site plan approval. Any alteration may require an application to amend the affected approved plans. Page 6 of 14 Development Review Staff Report The applicant is cautioned to consider the placement of utilities and any underground or above ground site improvement that could cause a conflict with the landscaping and possibly cause a change or amendment. As-built landscape plans submitted prior to the release of a certificate of occupancy will be checked against the approved drawings. Inconsistencies may block the issuance of the certificate of occupancy and cause the applicant to begin the application process for a change or an amendment to the development order.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Building for Wellness: the Business Case
    Building for Wellness THE BUSINESS CASE Building Healthy Places Initiative Building Healthy Places Initiative ULI Center for Capital Markets and Real Estate BuildingforWellness2014cover.indd 3 3/18/14 2:13 PM Building for Wellness THE BUSINESS CASE Project Director and Author Anita Kramer Primary Author Terry Lassar Contributing Authors Mark Federman Sara Hammerschmidt This project was made possible in part through the generous financial support of ULI Foundation Governor Bruce Johnson. ULI also wishes to acknowledge the Colorado Health Foundation for its support of the ULI Building Healthy Places Initiative. Building Healthy ULI Center for Capital Markets Places Initiative and Real Estate ACRONYMS HEPA—high-efficiency particulate absorption HOA—homeowners association Recommended bibliographic listing: HUD—U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Kramer, Anita, Terry Lassar, Mark Federman, and Sara Hammer- HVAC—heating, ventilation, and air conditioning schmidt. Building for Wellness: The Business Case. Washington, D.C.: LEED—Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Urban Land Institute, 2014. VOC—volatile organic compound ISBN: 978-0-87420-334-9 MEASUREMENTS © 2014 Urban Land Institute 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW ac—acre Suite 500 West ha—hectare Washington, DC 20007-5201 km—kilometer All rights reserved. Reproduction or use of the whole or any part of mi—mile the contents without written permission of the copyright holder is sq ft—square foot prohibited. sq m—square meter 2 BUILDING FOR WELLNESS: THE BUSINESS CASE About the Urban Land Institute The mission of the Urban Land Institute is to provide • Sustaining a diverse global network of local prac- leadership in the responsible use of land and in tice and advisory efforts that address current and creating and sustaining thriving communities world- future challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • North Meadows Business Park Bakersfield's Premier Industrial
    NORTH MEADOWS BUSINESS PARK BAKERSFIELD’S PREMIER INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS PARK Highway 65 • North of 7th Standard Road • Bakersfield, CA LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, HEAVY LIFTING North Meadows Business Park is a 180-acre, master-planned business park offering speculative or build-to-suit facilities for lease or sale on lots ranging from 1–16 acres. 180-acre park with design flexibility Premium concrete tilt-up construction warehouses with yards Buildings available from 18,000 to 133,000 SF for lease, sale or build-to-suit LOCATED AT NORTHERN TIP OF MEADOWS FIELD AIRPORT Located on Hwy-65, north of Merle Haggard Drive Direct access to Hwy-99, I-5 and SR-65 Proximity to local businesses, FedEx and UPS Ground sort hubs Nearby abundant housing and labor, 490,486 residents within 10 miles “W∂nderful Real Estate Development exceeded our expectations on our project at North Meadows Business Park. The construction of our new facility was a success in every aspect, including the expedited development process and high-quality product we received. With a focus on the future, we can now reach our short and long term goals for growth and continued success.” — Glen Ephrom, Operations Manager at Precision Pump Within North Meadows Business Park Surrounding North Meadows Business Park NEIGHBORING Advanced Industrial Services CarQuest United States Postal Service COMPANIES Schlumberger John Deere USA Maxis Storage Precision Pump Quinn / CAT Hampton Inn AND AMENITIES Chep Gray Lift LaQuinta Inn United Rentals Starbucks Kern Schools Federal Credit Union Williams Scotsman Subway The Bakersfield Californian Kelly Pipe Denny’s QUINN ROAD DRAINAGE BASIN PAPE PETR CHEP OL ADVANCED LOT 1 LOT 12 OLLIVIER INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 2.77 AC AERODYNE WAY RO KELLY PIPE 7.26 AC INVEST., (AIS) 45,200 SF AD 133,000 SF LLC DIRIGIBLE COUR MCKENNA ARSENAL HOWES BAYMARR GAZELLE TRUST EQUIPMENT TRANS., INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnwood Business Park Retail Analysis and Feasibility Report
    Lincolnwood Business Park Retail Analysis & Feasibility Report October 7, 2010 prepared by Introduction Lincolnwood Business Park Feasibility Report 1 prepared by Houseal Lavigne Associates Introduction The Village of Lincolnwood has retained A demographic and retail market analysis has The Feasibility Report identifies Houseal Lavigne Associates to assess the been conducted to identify the amount and type market potential, site capacity, feasibility of retail development within the of retail development that might be supported and impediments to development as Lincolnwood Business Park. The study area at Lincolnwood Business Park. While the well as actions likely required by comprises the area bounded by Touhy Avenue analysis focuses on the Business Park, we have the Village to realize development to the north, McCormick Boulevard to the also examined the physical and economic potential. east, Pratt Avenue to the south, and Hamlin relationship with the adjacent Lincolnwood Avenue to the west. Lowe’s, which occupies Town Center and nearby commercial the southeast corner of Touhy and Lawndale development along Touhy Avenue. Avenues is also located within the study area. The study area excludes the Grossinger In addition to a full market analysis to Autoplex property located on the northwest ascertain supportable uses, interviews were corner of McCormick Boulevard and Northeast conducted with elected and appointed officials, Parkway, the Lincolnwood Place senior housing members of the development community, and facility, and the Lincolnwood Town Center. local business owners with insight into the Lincolnwood Business Park and greater market area. Lincolnwood Town Center 2 Lincolnwood Business Park Feasibility Report prepared by Houseal Lavigne Associates Interviews were conducted with the goal Key interview points included: of soliciting a wide range of points of view.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan-And-Manage-A-Science-Park-In
    Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 1 Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 2 Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 1 Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 2 Projet1 3/12/09 15:57 Page 3 SUMMARY PAGE 4 INTRODUCTION PAGE 11 CHAPTER I SCIENCE PARK PLAYERS AND PARTNERS 1. The stakeholders 13 2. The role of the State 15 3. Strategies to mobilize the private sector 17 4. Enhancing the innovation environment 20 PAGE 25 CHAPTER II STRATEGIC POSITIONING OF SCIENCE PARKS 1. The positioning of the science park 28 2. Consensus building in positioning strategies 35 3. Sustainability of the science park 39 4. Project development and opportunities 44 PAGE 51 CHAPTER III DEVELOPMENT OF A SCIENCE PARK OR TECHNOPOLE AND URBAN INTEGRATION 1. The science park development context 55 2. The programming chart and the implementation of inputs: facilities, land and services 58 3. Conditions for integrating a science park into the host metropolis 63 PAGE 66 CHAPTER IV FINANCING SCIENCE PARK ACTIVITIES 1. Introduction 68 2. The financial environment 70 3. The funding options 79 4. Key points 89 PAGE 90 CHAPTER V SUPPORT FOR FIRMS AND PROJECTS Part A: Individual services 1. The role of coaching and mentoring in supporting innovative projects 93 2. Strategic marketing and operational positioning 98 3. Strategic alliance support 102 4. Financial assistance and relations with investors 105 Part B: Collective services 1. Marketing and communication for innovative projects 109 2. Stimulate and support networking and development of collaborative projects 112 3. Business Development (BizDev) actions 116 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Commission Major Issues Summary
    Humboldt County General Plan Update Major Issues Summary Major Issues Summary: 5-21-09 Chapter 8 Housing Element Overview At the last meeting on the 2009 Housing Element on April 16, 2009, the Planning Commission requested staff provide materials to focus the remaining deliberations on the major issues where there is not consensus on the policies, standards and implementation measures, and organize them by topic. Issue #1 Requirements for a Mixture of Housing Sizes and Types Staff Comment: The Commission is considering modifications to this policy to apply to all residential subdivisions, and to require the long term affordability covenants and restrictions of Alternative A. At the April 16 th meeting, there was also interest in developing a policy that combined mixed housing and inclusionary requirements. Alternative B, Alternative A and this new combination policy is discussed below. Alternative B requires a mixture of housing sizes and types in all subdivisions in Housing Opportunity Zones which have public sewer. A schedule has been added to the Standards section to specify a prescriptive mixture of housing types that would comply with the mixed housing type policy. Applicants could propose alternatives mixes of equal or better affordability to the prescribed standards for review and approval of the Planning Commission. Policy variables that your Commission can consider under Alternative B include: 1) The minimum size of the subdivision that would be subject to the requirements. As currently crafted, Alternative B would apply the requirements to all major subdivisions. The original staff recommendation applied the requirements to subdivisions with a total build-out potential of 70 units or more.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Park Design Guide
    City of Muskego Business Park Design Guide Adopted on January 16, 2007 Prepared by: City of Muskego Planning Department And Vandewalle & Associates City of Muskego Business Park Design Guide ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Honorable Mayor John R. Johnson Common Council Council President Nancy Salentine, District 4 Alderman Tracy Snead, District 1 Alderman Chris Buckmaster, District 2 Alderman Neil Borgman, District 3 Alderman Bob Melcher, District 5 Alderman Tina Schaefer, District 6 Alderman Eileen Madden, District 7 Plan Commission Mayor John R. Johnson Alderman Chris Buckmaster Mr. Jerald Hulbert Mr. Michael Michalski Ms. Neome Schaumberg Mr. Russ Stinebaugh Mr. James Burke Planning Department Staff Jeff Muenkel AICP, Planning Director Adam Trzebiatowski, Associate Planner Tom Zagar, City Forester John Wisniewski, GIS Coordinator Sean Meehan, Planning/GIS Intern Matt Kulinski, Conservation Technician Kellie Renk, Secretary City of Muskego Business Park Design Guide RESOLUTION #P.C. 007-2007 APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO ALL CITY OF MUSKEGO DESIGN GUIDES TO BRING THEM INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CHAPTER 17 ZONING CODE REVISIONS AND CURRENT CITY POLICIES WHEREAS, The City of Muskego maintains seven (7) Design Guides in order to serve as a reference in guiding and reviewing future development for citizens, developers, and commissioners, and WHEREAS, There is a General Design Guide that applies to the entire City along with six (6) other area specific Design Guides that are unique to the character of each said area, and WHEREAS, The six (6) area specific Design
    [Show full text]
  • Gresham Vista Business Park
    GRESHAM VISTA BUSINESS PARK Eco-Industrial Development Pilot Project LESSONS LEARNED Final Report December 28, 2016 Prepared by Light House Sustainable Building Centre for the Port of Portland and City of Gresham Gresham Vista Business Park Lessons Learned Final Report December 27, 2016 © 2016 Light House Sustainable Building Centre Society. Vancouver, BC, Canada. Exclusive rights for unlimited use granted to the Port of Portland and City of Gresham. Light House | #90 - 425 Carrall Street, Vancouver BC V6B 6E3 | T:604.677.3126 | W: www.lhsbc.com Gresham Vista Business Park Lessons Learned Final Report December 27, 2016 i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Eco-industrial development involves a conscientious effort to apply lessons from nature (e.g., through more biophilic and The Gresham Vista Business Park (GVBP) was developed biomimicking design) and to take a systems by the Port of Portland (Port), in collaboration with the approach to industrial development. City of Gresham (City). At present time, there is one new business, the Subaru Distribution Center, operating on Site Plans: Set the stage for infrastructure, Lot 4 (39 acres). Lot 4 was purchased and developed by buildings and operations (e.g., to support the Trammell Crow Company on behalf of Subaru, which wastewater re-use, include land for a is leasing the site back from Trammell Crow. Trammell wastewater treatment plant and illustrate Crow has purchased Lots 1, 2 and 3 and plans to develop extra piping rights-of-way allowances). 3 speculative industrial buildings by 2018. Madison- Specht Vista Logistics LLC purchased Lot 9 and is building Infrastructure: Stormwater: Apply bio- three speculative industrial buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Springs Q1 2021
    Colorado Springs Q1 2021 OFFFICE MARKET REPORT SM FULL-SERVICE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS PRIVATELY-OWNED AND OPERATED FOR OVER 40 YEARS 303.321.5888 UNIQUEPROP.COM Colorado Springs Office OFFICE MARKET REPORT Market Key Statistics 1 Leasing 2 Rent 6 Construction 9 Under Construction Properties 10 Sales 12 Sales Past 12 Months 14 Economy 16 Market Submarkets 21 Supply & Demand Trends 23 Rent & Vacancy 25 Sale Trends 27 4/21/2021 Copyrighted report licensed to Unique Properties, Inc. - 1130503 Overview Colorado Springs Office 12 Mo Deliveries in SF 12 Mo Net Absorption in SF Vacancy Rate 12 Mo Rent Growth 240K (311K) 8.9% 1.7% The headline numbers in Colorado Springs' office market existing buildings. Although absorption turned negative in couldn't have been much better before the pandemic. 20Q3 when net absorption was nearly -50,000 SF, Thanks to a strong recovery in the job market since the Colorado Springs appears to be weathering the storm coronavirus-induced downturn, Colorado Springs is in better than most. far better shape than most markets even though supply pressure pushed vacancies to 8.7% in 21Q1. Developers have been wary of testing the waters in Colorado Springs throughout this cycle, with regional Rent growth is outperforming the national average, developers focusing almost entirely instead on Denver ending 21Q1 at about 2.1% compared to a negative and Boulder. 1.6% from the national index. Investors were active in the Colorado Springs market in While a handful of large deals have played a role in the 21Q1 with nearly $130 million in traded assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Garner Business Park 70 Us Hwy
    GARNER BUSINESS PARK 70 US HWY. 70, GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA Presented By: No Tagline version below: Tagline version below: GARNER - NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL Garner Business Park 70 US Hwy. 70, Garner NC PROPERTY OVERVIEW TOTAL SF AVAILABLE: ±675,000 SF INDUSTRIAL PARK PROPERTY FEATURES: Blank canvas for large corporate users Active rail spur on site Frontage on US Hwy. 70 PARKING: Opportunity for heavy parking and outside storage LOCATION: Excellent access and visibility off Hwy. 70 Located in the rapidly growing communities of Garner and Wake County, NC Excellent opportunity to draw labor from multiple surrounding counties Short drive to Downtown Raleigh, RDU International Airport, I-40, I-440 and the planned I-540 Extension Garner Business Park 70 US Hwy. 70, Garner NC BUILDING 1 OVERVIEW BUILDING 1: ±150,000 SF Approximately 12.87 acres 2301 & 2337 US Hwy. 70 E Garner, NC 27529 PROPERTY FEATURES: Dimensions: 240' deep x 625' long Ceiling Height: 30' Clear Dock Doors: 12 (9'x10' manual doors) Drive in Doors: 2 (12'x14') Lighting: 1 High bay T5 fixture located in each loading dock bay (other fixtures are part of TI package) *See next page for full building specifications PARKING: 117 car parks ZONING: SB & I-1 Town of Garner Jurisdiction Table of Permitted Uses LEASE RATE: Call broker for details Garner Business Park 70 Building 1 Specifications Sheet US Hwy. 70, Garner NC Building 1 Delivery Date Q2 2020 Warehouse Ceiling Height 30' minimum clear beyond the staging bay Site Area ±12.87 Acres Dock Doors Twelve (12) 9'x10' manual dock
    [Show full text]
  • Nedap Provides Frictionless Vehicle Access Experience for Tenants at HQ Business Park, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
    Nedap provides frictionless vehicle access experience for tenants at HQ Business Park, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia The Headquarters Business Park developed by Adeem Al-Watania is a 52 storey office building located on the coast site of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. When completed in 2012, it became the tallest building in Jeddah and is served by a large 11-storey parking garage. Nedap’s Long-Range Identification solutions provide seamless vehicle access to employees and long-term tenants. The devices were successful installed and integrated with Lenel Access control system OnGuard by Idex Services. The Headquarters Business Park Tower registered vehicle with UHF tag installed approaches the This tallest skyscraper, towering above Jeddah’s North long-range UHF RFID reader installed near the barrier, the Corniche and with a unique “Sail of a dhow” design, is an vehicle is automatically identified and access is granted for iconic structure in the commercial hub of Saudi Arabia. The authorized vehicles to the parking facility. iconic business park consists of offices, clinics, restaurants, entertainment facilities and a luxurious hotel. It has three Parking access to tenants based on LPR main sections, the West tower housing 52 floors, East tower The iconic tower with sea-view includes a luxurious hotel and housing a luxurious hotel with 16 floors and a mid-section it is observed that tenants stay for a longer duration or prefer with 11-storey parking facility comprising of 2.000 parking coming back on regular basis. To provide a seamless spots which connects the West and East towers. experience to tenants and ensure smooth flow of vehicles and drivers into the parking facility, there was a need for a Need for hands-free vehicle access solution which could grant tenant vehicles access With the exemplary design of the tower, there was a need temporarily or incidentally.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Real Estate Developers Ranked by Utah Full-Time Employees
    Commercial Building & Real Estate Commercial Real Estate Developers Ranked by Utah Full-Time Employees Year Utah Company Phone Address Senior Officer Notable Projects Est. FTE Wells Fargo Center, City Center, 50 & 80 West Broadway Wasatch Commercial Management 595 S. Riverwoods Pkwy., Ste. 400 Dell Loy Hansen (435) 755-2000 1987 Tower, Questar Corporate Center, Ken Garff Building, Woodland 500 wasatchgroup.com Logan, UT 84321 (Founder/CEO) Business Park, Marketstar Building Woodbury Corporation 2733 Parley’s Way, Ste. 300 Randall Woodbury Owns and manages over 11 million square feet of retail, office, 2 (801) 485-7770 1925 450 woodburycorp.com Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (CEO) hotel and industrial buildings Utah Property Management 51 S. Main Street, Ste. 300 Mark Gibbons Manages and develops property owned by the Corporation of 3 Assoc./Property Reserve (801) 321-8700 1922 200 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 (President) the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints utpma.com The Boyer Company 101 S. 200 East, Ste. 200 Jake Boyer Vista Station, Gateway, One Utah Center, Business Depot 4 (801) 521-4781 1972 120 boyercompany.com Salt Lake City, UT 84111 (President/CEO) Ogden, Sugarhouse Commons Mountain America CU, Overstock, City Center, Vista Station, Gardner Company 201 S. Main Street Christian Gardner 5 (801) 456-4140 2004 StorageCraft, 1-800 CONTACTS, Progressive, Thumbtack, Dell 50 gardnercompany.net Salt Lake City, UT 84111 (President/CEO) EMC, Tesla/Solar City, jet.com, Academy Mtg. Peak Capital Partners 4956 N. 300 West, Ste. 300 Chris Manning 6 (801) 341-0300 2007 DND 50 peakcapitalpartners.com Provo, UT 84604 (CEO) Top Golf at Riverwalk, The Crossing at Sahuarita, Verisk, Wadsworth Development Group 166 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Avison Young Commercial Real Estate Investment Review
    Fall 2018 Avison Young Commercial Real Estate Investment Review North America and Europe Partnership. Performance. Contents Overview 05 Canada Investment Market Overview 43 Memphis 71 London 11 U.S. Investment Market Overview 44 Miami 72 Manchester 45 Minneapolis Canada 46 Nashville Germany 17 Calgary 47 New Jersey 74 Berlin 18 Edmonton 48 New York 75 Duesseldorf Montreal 19 49 Oakland 76 Frankfurt 20 Ottawa 50 Orange County 77 Hamburg 21 Toronto Orlando 51 78 Munich Vancouver 22 52 Philadelphia Phoenix Romania United States 53 Pittsburgh 54 80 Bucharest 24 Atlanta 55 Raleigh-Durham 25 Austin 56 Sacramento More from Avison Young 26 Boston San Antonio 57 Company Overview 27 Charlotte 84 58 San Diego County 28 Chicago 86 Publications and Social Media 59 San Francisco 29 Cleveland 87 Contact Us 60 San Jose/Silicon Valley 30 Columbus, OH 61 San Mateo 31 Dallas 62 St. Louis 32 Denver 63 Tampa 33 Detroit Washington, DC 34 Fairfield County 64 West Palm Beach 35 Fort Lauderdale 65 Westchester County 36 Hartford 66 37 Houston Mexico 38 Indianapolis 39 Jacksonville 68 Mexico City Disclaimer 40 Las Vegas United Kingdom The statistics contained in this report were obtained from sources deemed reliable, including Altus InSite, Avison Young, Collette, Plante & Associés, Commercial Edge, CoStar Group 41 Long Island Inc., Desjarlais Prévost Inc., Gettel Network, Property Data Ltd., Real Capital Analytics, Inc., RealNet Canada, RealTrack, Reis Services, LLC, and Thomas Daily GmbH. However, Avison Young (Canada) Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information presented, nor does it assume any responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]