DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Development Plan (Idp) 2019-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrated Development Plan (Idp) 2019-2020 INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (IDP) 2019-2020 Draft Index 3.4 PROCESS TO FILL FUNDED VACANT POSITIONS ................. 85 FOREWORD BY THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR.................................. 3 3.5 MUNICIPAL WORKFORCE .......................................... 85 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FROM THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER ............... 6 3.6 SKILLS DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 87 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................... 7 3.7 MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY . 88 Spatial Analysis ................................................................ 7 3.8 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS ............................... 90 Geographical Context ......................................................... 8 3.9 TECHNICAL INTEGRATED MUNICIPAL ENGAGEMENT (TIME) ... 91 Ward Delineation ............................................................ 10 3.10 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) .... 91 Environmental Context ..................................................... 13 CHAPTER 4 ................................................................... 94 Biophysical Context ......................................................... 13 4.1 IMPROVE AND SUSTAIN BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND Infrastructural Context ..................................................... 14 INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................. 96 Social Context ............................................................... 15 4.2 FINANCIAL VIABILITY AND ECONOMICALLY SUSTAINABILITY . 114 Economical Context ......................................................... 22 4.3 GOOD GOVERNANCE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & PUBLIC Financial Summary .......................................................... 25 PARTICIPATION .................................................... 114 CHAPTER 1 ................................................................... 28 4.4 FACILITATE, EXPAND AND NURTURE SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 28 GROWTH AND ERADICATE POVERTY ............................ 122 THE FOURTH (4TH) GENERATION IDP ........................... 29 4.5 ENABLE A RESILIENT, SUSTAINABLE, QUALITY AND INCLUSIVE LIVING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN SETTLEMENTS I.E. HOUSING THE IDP AND AREA PLANS ......................................... 30 DEVELOPMENT AND INFORMAL SETTLEMENT UPGRADE ...... 148 POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT ............................. 31 4.6 TO FACILITATE SOCIAL COHESION, SAFE AND HEALTHY STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK OF THE IDP ............................ 32 COMMUNITIES ...................................................... 162 VISION, MISSION, VALUES ......................................... 33 4.7 DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFORMATION OF THE INSTITUTION TO PROVIDE A PEOPLE-CENTERED HUMAN RESOURCES AND STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ........................................... 34 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE TO CITIZENS, STAFF AND COUNCIL ALIGNMENT WITH INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL AND 187 PROVINCIAL POLICY DIRECTIVES ................................. 35 4.8 SECTOR DEPARTMENT PROJECTS ............................... 187 STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT ........................................... 46 OTHER PROGRAMME ROLLOUTS ................................... 190 DraftIDP AND BUDGET PROCESS ........................................ 47 CHAPTER 5 ................................................................. 194 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................... 56 5.1 MUNICIPAL BUDGET OVERVIEW ................................. 194 CEDERBERG SPATIAL ANALYSIS ................................... 57 5.2 FINANCIAL STRATEGY ............................................ 194 CEDERBERG MUNICIPALITY SWOT ANALYSIS .................... 59 5.3 ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORK .................................. 196 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE ........................................... 63 5.4 FINANCIAL STRATEGIC APPROACH .............................. 197 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE ........................................ 66 5.5 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ON 2020/21 MTREF BUDGET ........... 197 WESTERN CAPE JOINT PLANNING INITIATIVES .................. 81 5.6 OPERATING EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK........................ 201 CHAPTER 3 ................................................................... 82 5.7 SERVICE DELIVERY EXPENDITURE ............................... 203 3.1 POLITICAL STRUCTURE ............................................ 82 5.8 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE ........................................... 203 3.2 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM ................................. 83 5.9 TARIFFS ............................................................ 206 3.3 THE ORGANISATIONAL DESIGN PROJECT ........................ 85 1 Index CHAPTER 6 ................................................................. 215 LIST OF TABLES ........................................................... 236 6.1 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW ...................... 215 LIST OF MAPS .............................................................. 238 6.2 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ................................ 218 LIST OF GRAPHS .......................................................... 238 6.3 THE SDBIP CONCEPT: A PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVE ............ 218 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................... 238 6.4 PERFORMANCE REPORTING ...................................... 219 6.5 RISK MANAGEMENT ............................................... 220 6.6 MUNICIPAL SCORECARED ......................................... 222 CONCLUSION ............................................................... 235 Draft 2 Foreword by the Executive Mayor FOREWORD BY THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR The Integrated Development Plan (IDP) is the Municipality’s single, inclusive and strategic development plan outlining targeted geographic investment for a five-year period. A requirement of the Municipal Systems Act of 2000, the IDP outlines the policy framework on which annual budgets is based and forms the basis of the Medium-Term Revenue & Expenditure Framework (MTREF) of Cederberg Municipality. However, the document also contains much more than that. It contains investment and development initiatives; all the projects, plans and programmes devised and key performance indicators - the scorecards by which one can determine whether the municipality as a whole, its departments and officials are doing their job. The IDP also includes several sector plans, such as the Spatial Development Framework (SDF), which deals with the urban edge of Cederberg, densification, transport, the need for commercial nodes and providing a blueprint for a town that is sustainable, accessible and efficient. The formulation of the IDP is a process that involves various stages, various stakeholders, the qualified staff and directors of the various departments of the Municipality and Council. Input from the various communities drives the various focus areas. Feedback from residents, ward committees, intergovernmental and other stakeholders, enables us to identify key trends and drivers of development, or under development. The diversity of the Cederberg area creates a unique variety of challenges and the Municipality strives to act within the parameters of a long-term vision, understanding the challenges and taking into consideration inherited and current conditions. The concept of integrated planning ensures that the limited resources of the Municipality are being optimised to foster partnerships between vast arrays of stakeholders to collectively improve the livelihoods of communities by meeting the strategic objectives crafted by Council. This is even more prevalent, given the uncertain future due to the national state of disaster due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite dealing with catastrophic events outsideDraft our control, such as the Cederberg fires and the COVID-19 pandemic, Council is forging ahead to create a Cederberg that is innovative, inspired and inclusive, focusing on our strategic objectives. Successes to date include: • The Council and administration developed a Revenue Enhancement Plan, Budget Plan and a fully funded Adjustment Budget to holistically address the financial challenges faced by Cederberg Municipality since 2016. • To improve and maintain current basic service delivery through specific infrastructural development projects we are happy to report that the Citrusdal Waste Water Treatment Works (WWTW) is 75% completed and will be finalised in March 2021. The Desalination Water Plant and Housing Development in Lamberts Bay will start early next year. • We have filled all critical senior management positions which including the Chief Financial Officer, Director: Technical Services and Director: Community Services. 3 Executive Summary • We also reduced the directorates from 4 to 3 as a cost cutting measure but also to improve service delivery. Impact of COVID-19 on planning We realise that the lockdown had serious effects on the national and our local economy. Many local businesses, employers and employees are struggling to keep their heads above water. Unfortunately, due to our financial situation, no debt relief can be offered to ratepayers or businesses. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our economy and our residents had a devastating effect. Despite this, we have continued with our main mandate, service delivery and whilst dealing with the issues, we will continue to do that. The COVID-19 crisis is having a deep effect on local governance around the country. The outbreak has a profound effect on local public health, an unprecedented impact
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GTAC/CBPEP/ EU Project on Employment-Intensive Rural Land Reform in South Africa: Policies, Programmes and Capacities
    GTAC/CBPEP/ EU project on employment-intensive rural land reform in South Africa: policies, programmes and capacities Municipal case study Matzikama Local Municipality, Western Cape David Mayson, Rick de Satgé and Ivor Manuel with Bruno Losch Phuhlisani NPC March 2020 Abbreviations and acronyms BEE Black Economic Empowerment CASP Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme CAWH Community Animal Health Worker CEO Chief Executive Officer CPA Communal Property of Association CPAC Commodity Project Allocation Committee DAAC District Agri-Park Advisory Committee DAPOTT District Agri Park Operational Task Team DoA Department of Agriculture DRDLR Department of Rural Development and Land Reform DWS Department of Water and Sanitation ECPA Ebenhaeser CPA FALA Financial Assistance Land FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation FPSU Farmer Production Support Unit FTE Full-Time Equivalent GGP Gross Geographic Product GDP Gross Domestic Product GVA Gross Value Added HDI Historically Disadvantaged Individual IDP Integrated Development Plan ILO International Labour Organisation LED Local economic development LORWUA Lower Olifants Water Users Association LSU Large stock units NDP National Development Plan PDOA Provincial Department of Agriculture PGWC Provincial Government of the Western Cape PLAS Proactive Land Acquisition Strategy SDF Spatial Development Framework SLAG Settlement and Land Acquisition Grant SSU Small stock unit SPP Surplus People Project TRANCRAA Transformation of Certain Rural Areas Act WUA Water Users Association ii Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast District Municipality Integrated Development Plan 2011
    West Coast District Municipality Integrated Development Plan 2012/2016 Review 2 - Draft 1 This review document to be read in conjunction with the main 5-year 2012-2016 IDP document. February 2014 West Coast District Municipality Office of the Municipal Manager, E-mail: [email protected] Coast District Tel: Municipality +27 22 433 8400 Fax: +27 86 692 6113 1 www.westcoastdm.co.zaIDP 2012-2016 Review 2 2 West Coast District Municipality IDP 2012-2016 Review 2 2 Map: West Coast District List of municipalities 3 Matzikama Cederberg Bergrivier Saldanha Bay Swartland Source: West Coast District Municipality, 2012 West Coast District Municipality IDP 2012-2016 Review 2 3 FOREWORD: EXECUTIVE MAYOR ______________________________________________________________________ To be included in the Final version. 4 John H Cleophas (Executive Mayor) West Coast District Municipality IDP 2012-2016 Review 2 4 PREFACE: MUNICIPAL MANAGER ______________________________________________________________________ To be included in the Final version. 5 Henry F Prins (Municipal Manager) West Coast District Municipality IDP 2012-2016 Review 2 5 REVISION NOTE ______________________________________________________________________ To be included in the Final version. 6 Earl Williams (Senior Manager Strategic Services) West Coast District Municipality IDP 2012-2016 Review 2 6 Table of Contents This review document to be read in conjunction with the main 5-year 2012-2016 IDP document. I West Coast Investment Profile (also on overleaf) 2& II Map 3 III Foreword: Executive Mayor 4 IV Preface: Municipal Manager 5 V Revision note 6 VI Table of contents 7 VII Economic Development Partnership brochure (Centre pages of document) 1. District Overview and Introduction 1.1 West Coast at a glance 8 1.2 Performance Scorecard 9-10 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Masters in Development Studies Mds 794
    RESILIENCE AND ADAPTABILITY OF RURAL COMMUNITIES A CASE STUDY OF EBENHAESER James Backhouse visit to Ebenezer, 1840 DISSERTATION MASTERS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES MDS 794 Ilma Brink Student number: 2005024092 Centre for Development Support University of the Free State Bloemfontein 2014 Resilience and Adaptability of Rural Communities. A Case Study of Ebenhaeser Ilma Brink Contents TABLE OF FIGURES, MAPS, TABLES AND TRAVEL DEPICTIONS ....................... 4 ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 7 CHAPTER 1: PROBLEM STATEMENT .................................................................. 10 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Critical Questions ........................................................................................ 11 1.2 Objectives of the Study ............................................................................... 12 1.3 Significance of the Study ............................................................................. 12 CHAPTER 2: RESEARCH DESIGN ........................................................................ 13 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Focus area of research ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Communal Land Tenure in Ebenhaeser, South Africa, 2012 – 2017
    PUTTING JUSTICE INTO PRACTICE: COMMUNAL LAND TENURE IN EBENHAESER, SOUTH AFRICA, 2012 – 2017 SYNOPSIS Following the 1994 transition from racial apartheid to democracy, South Africa’s government aimed to provide tenure security for the estimated 16 million black South Africans living in communal areas. But the lack of a clear legal framework applicable to most communal areas meant that progress was slow. In contrast, a viable legal framework did exist to guide tenure reform in smaller communal areas formerly known as “coloured reserves,” where a series of apartheid laws had settled people of mixed race. In 2009, land reform Minister Gugile Nkwiti designated one such area—Ebenhaeser, on the country’s west coast—as a rural “flagship” project. The aim was both to transfer land held in trust by the government to Ebenhaeser community members and to settle a restitution claim. Provincial officials from Nkwinti’s ministry, working with private consultants, organized a communal association to serve as landowner. They helped negotiate an agreement with white farmers to return land that had originally belonged to coloured residents. The community also developed a land administration plan that would pave the way for Ebenhaeser’s residents to become the legal owners of their communal territory. Leon Schreiber drafted this case study based on interviews conducted in the Western Cape, Gauteng, and Eastern Cape provinces of South Africa, in March 2017. Case published May 2017. INTRODUCTION At a 2009 press conference, Gugile Nkwinti, Jacob Zuma, who had
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Olifants River Survey
    UPPER OLIFANTS RIVER SURVEY An assessment of woody riparian and alien vegetation Sam Jack1, Greg Nicolson2 & Ian Durbach3 January 2016 1. Corresponding author. Plant Conservation Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch, 7701, Cape Town. T: 021 650 2483, E: [email protected] 2. Greg Nicolson Consulting, 9 Recreation Road, Muizenberg, 7945, Cape Town 3. Centre for Statistics in Ecology, Environment, and Conservation, Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, 7701, Cape Town 1 Introduction The perennial Olifants Rivers system arises in the high‐elevation Agter‐Witzenberg Valley north of Ceres and flows for over 250 km in a north‐westerly direction to its mouth near the West Coast town of Papendorp (Figure 1). Along its course to the sea the Olifants is supplemented by several smaller perennial rivers, such as the Thee, Noordhoek, Boontjies, Rondegat, Jan Dissels, and the non‐ perennial Sout. Its main tributary is the Doring River feeding in from the east at around 2/3rd’s of its length. Two significant dams, namely the Clanwilliam and Bulshoek Dams, are situated along the mid‐course of the river. The Olifants River is central to the presence and success of an extensive agricultural industry in the Olifants River basin. This mainly comprises citrus orchards, vineyards and potatoes, which require year round water. The river (and dams) also supplies water to several major towns along its length, namely Citrusdal, Clanwilliam, Vanrhynsdorp, Vredendal and Lutzville, and serves as an important focal point for water‐related recreational activities and tourism in the West Coast District.
    [Show full text]
  • Ar Background and Introduction
    7/18/2011 Power in Place: Protecting living law and local knowledge in coastalAr planning processes Background and Introduction 1) the Olifants River traditional net fishing community illustrates Nico Waldeck and Henk Smith how traditional fishing communities in South Africa are challenging the dominant fisheries and integrated coastal management paradigm 2) they are arguing for an alternative, community‐based approach that recognises customary fisheries systems, values fishers’ knowledges and enables legitimate governance to emerge from local experiences 3) they are claiming their rights to participate in the current planning processes for the estuary 4) living customary law is now recognised as a source of law in the South African legal system and this has implications for the process and content of ICM and fisheries policy and legal frameworks photo by Dirk Trotskie ‐ 1 2 Shilubana Living law and local knowledgesThe Olifants River Estuary at the ..... South Africa Olifants River estuary Johannesburg KwaZulu‐Natal Province Richtersveld Northern Cape Province Durban OlifantsRiver Eastern Cape Province Western Cape Province Cape Town Small‐scale fishing communities Marine Protected Areas photo by Maria Smith and 3 Atlantic Ocean Indian Ocean Jackie Sunde ‐ 4 Nico Waldeck and Niclaas le Oom Sekkie Africa ‐ 6 Roux Junior ‐ 5 1 7/18/2011 Oom Niclaas ler Roux and his photo Merle Sewman ‐ 7 tema of net menders ‐ 8 9Nuwepos home with life Oom Niclaas le Roux – jacket on washing line ‐ Nuwepose Ebenhaeser ‐ 10 Photo Kobus Pienaar, Thursday 28
    [Show full text]
  • Flower Route Map 2017
    K o n k i e p en w R31 Lö Narubis Vredeshoop Gawachub R360 Grünau Karasburg Rosh Pinah R360 Ariamsvlei R32 e N14 ng Ora N10 Upington N10 IAi-IAis/Richtersveld Transfrontier Park Augrabies N14 e g Keimoes Kuboes n a Oranjemund r Flower Hotlines O H a ib R359 Holgat Kakamas Alexander Bay Nababeep N14 Nature Reserve R358 Groblershoop N8 N8 Or a For up-to-date information on where to see the Vioolsdrif nge H R27 VIEWING TIPS best owers, please call: Eksteenfontein a r t e b e e Namakwa +27 (0)72 760 6019 N7 i s Pella t Lekkersing t Brak u Weskus +27 (0)63 724 6203 o N10 Pofadder S R383 R383 Aggeneys Flower Hour i R382 Kenhardt To view the owers at their best, choose the hottest Steinkopf R363 Port Nolloth N14 Marydale time of the day, which is from 11h00 to 15h00. It’s the s in extended ower power hour. Respect the ower Tu McDougall’s Bay paradise: Walk with care and don’t trample plants R358 unnecessarily. Please don’t pick any buds, bulbs or N10 specimens, nor disturb any sensitive dune areas. Concordia R361 R355 Nababeep Okiep DISTANCE TABLE Prieska Goegap Nature Reserve Sun Run fels Molyneux Buf R355 Springbok R27 The owers always face the sun. Try and drive towards Nature Reserve Grootmis R355 the sun to enjoy nature’s dazzling display. When viewing Kleinzee Naries i R357 i owers on foot, stand with the sun behind your back. R361 Copperton Certain owers don’t open when it’s overcast.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Ready Study
    MATZIKAMA MUNICIPALITY IMPLEMENTATION READY STUDY RBIG Report Phase 3: Klawer Bulk Water Infrastructure 262020KD0 June 2012 COMPILED FOR: COMPILED BY: Municipal Manager WorleyParsons RSA (Pty) Ltd Matzikama Municipality Contact person: . Mr HJ Mulder Private Bag 98 31 Allen Drive, Loevenstein 7530 Vredendal PO Box 398, Bellville 7535 8160 South Africa Telephone: +27 (0)21 912 3000 Telephone: +27 (0)27 201 3300 Facsimile: +27 (0)21 912 3222 Facsimile: +27 (0)27 201 2811 email: [email protected] ABN 61 001 279 812 © Copyright 2012 WorleyParsons Incorporating KV3 ENGINEERS MATZIKAMA MUNICIPALITY Disclaimer This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Matzikama Municipality, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between Matzikama Municipality and WorleyParsons RSA. WorleyParsons RSA accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for it in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Copying this report without the permission of Matzikama Municipality and WorleyParsons RSA is not permitted. PROJECT 262020KD0 - IMPLEMENTATION READY STUDY WORLEY- CLIENT REV DESCRIPTION ORIG REVIEW PARSONS DATE DATE APPROVAL APPROVAL A Issued for internal review 16-May-12 N/A HJ Mulder JJ Botha JCF Prins B Draft for Approval 8-Jun-12 N/A HJ Mulder JJ Botha JCF Prins p:\waterdept\klawer\262020 kd0 - rbig\g data\rbig reports work files\phase 3 - irs\26202v002rev01.docm (semir)Page i MATZIKAMA MUNICIPALITY IMPLEMENTATION READY STUDY RBIG REPORT PHASE 3: KLAWER BULK WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Olifants River Estuarine Management Plan
    Olifants River Estuarine Management Plan Draft June 2017 Olifants Estuary Management Plan i DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Document title and version: Olifants River Estuarine Management Plan (v.7) Project Name: Western Cape Estuarine Management Framework and Implementation Plan Client: Western Cape Government, Department of Environmental Affairs & Development Planning Royal HaskoningDHV reference number: MD1819 / W01.CPT.000210 Authority reference: EADP 1/2015 Compiled by: Version 1: Anchor Environmental (2009) Version 2: Royal HaskoningDHV (2016) Acknowledgements: Western Cape Government Environmental Affairs & Development Planning Chief Directorate: Environmental Sustainability Directorate: Biodiversity and Coastal Management Email: [email protected] Date: June 2017 Olifants River Estuarine Management Plan DOCUMENT USE The National Estuarine Management Protocol (the Protocol), promulgated in May 2013 under the National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Act (Act No. 24 of 2008, as amended by Act No. 36 of 2014), sets out the minimum requirements for individual estuarine management plans. In 2014, a review was conducted by the National Department of Environmental Affairs: Oceans and Coasts (DEA, 2014) on management plans existing at the time to ensure, inter alia, the alignment of these plans with the National Protocol. This revision of the Draft Olifants River Estuarine Management Plan, consisting of a Situation Assessment Report and the Management Plan itself, is primarily a response to the DEA review
    [Show full text]
  • (DRAFT REPORT) ESKOM WIND ENERGY FACILITY Tony Barbour
    SOCIAL ASSESSMENT FOR SCOPING REPORT (DRAFT REPORT) ESKOM WIND ENERGY FACILITY July 2007 Prepared for SAVANNAH ENVIRONMENTAL (Pty) Ltd By Tony Barbour Tony Barbour ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT AND RESEARCHER P O Box 1753, Sun Valley, 7975, South Africa (Tel) 27-21-789 1112 - (Fax) 27-21-789 1112 - (Cell) 082 600 8266 (E-Mail) [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION........................................................................... 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 3 1.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE.......................................................................... 3 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION............................................................................. 4 1.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION......................................................................... 4 1.5 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS .......................................................... 6 1.5.1 Assumptions.............................................................................. 6 1.5.2 Limitations ................................................................................ 7 1.6 APPROACH TO STUDY ........................................................................... 7 1.7 SPECIALIST DETAILS............................................................................ 7 1.8 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.......................................................... 7 1.9 REPORT STUCTURE .............................................................................. 8 SECTION
    [Show full text]
  • WES-KAAP | INTSHONA KOLONI I MAP of the WESTERN CAPE MUNICIPALITIES
    WESTERN CAPE | WES-KAAP | INTSHONA KOLONI i MAP of the WESTERN CAPE MUNICIPALITIES The municipalities in the Western Cape consist of: • One metro, • Five district municipalities, and • Twenty four local municipalities. ii CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL MUNICIPAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2008/09 CONTENT / INDEX FOREWORD BY MEC vi LIST OF TABLES vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY viii LEGISLATIVE OVERVIEW x RESEARCH METHODOLOGY xii CHAPTER 1: GEOGRAPHIC, DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILES OF MUNICIPALITIES 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Geographic information 1 1.3 Demographic information 2 1.4 Socio- economic information 3 1.5 Political composition 4 1.6 Classification of municipal capacity by the National Treasury 5 1.7 Assessment of the geographical and demographic data and the socio-economic profiles of municipalities 6 CHAPTER 2: MUNICIPAL INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Concise description of the strategic vision of each municipality 8 2.3 Integrated development planning per municipality 11 2.4 Analysis of Integrated development planning processes at municipal level 12 2.5 Summary grid on assessment of credibility of municipal Integrated Development Plans (IDPs) 12 CHAPTER 3: MUNICIPAL TRANSFORMATION AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT 3.1 Introduction 15 3.2 Institutional development and transformation 15 3.2.1 Municipal Organisational Structure 15 3.2.1.1 Filling of posts, transformation and HR policies and systems 15 3.2.1.1.1 Number of approved and vacant posts per municipality 17 3.2.1.1.2 Transformation statistics per municipality 18 3.2.1.1.3
    [Show full text]
  • Papendorp Section 5.18
    page 306 5.18 PAPENDORP (population: + 200) (IDP 2012-2017) 5.18.1 SPATIAL ANALYSIS, see Figures 5.18.1 Sub-regional location • 9km north of Strandfontein, 16kms south of Ebenhaeser; • 22kms from Lutzville and 42kms to Vredendal; • Located in close proximity to the community’s original primary economic resource, namely fishing and near a supply of freshwater; • In 2003 Marine and Coastal Management (MCM) phased out subsistence gill net fishing in the Berg River Estuary but gave 45 permit holders in the Olifants River Estuary exemptions to continue fishing until 2013 (Anchor Environmental, Olifants River Situation Assessment p 69, April 2008); • It is now largely a residential dormitory with some subsistence fishing but social grants and work further afield is Primary economic resource is fishing in the Olifants an important source of income; and, River Estuary • Salt mining occurs further south in the estuary. Layout pattern • The settlement, although very sparse, stretches for almost a kilometre from the historic abandoned church in the north to the guest house and crèche in the south; • The main residential area occupies an approved township accessed by the main north-south route and a series of cul-de sacs; and, • Most of the approved erven to the east, away from the estuary are vacant. Urban quality • The areas is notable for its lack of trees except around the guest house; and, • Most buildings are in a poor state of maintenance and possess little architectural character except for the guest house constructed in west-coast long house
    [Show full text]