DOCSLIB.ORG

Lsp Ltn 010 Co 001 Low Traffic Neighbourhood

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BUNYAN ROAD 282 2 Shelter 335 280 LB 60 SM 1 2 7 9 Low Maynard Reservoir 333 92 12 ROSA MEWS 1 58 22 1 278 95 El Sub Stas 47 10 to 1 HOOKER'S ROAD 64 25 46 Market 5 Shelter 2 5 35 13 276 CR 45 44 1 7 1 Dagenham Brook 12.3m Parade 2 Weir 4 21 to 11 2a Pipeline 50 1 1 2 24 42 59 4 3 1 266 1 12 75 51 85 4 13 8.5m 75 a 77 13 54 83 61 49 264 47 13 14 76 37 56 23 1 8 19.6m 25 29 9 Factory 13 12.6m PCs 1 TAVISTOCK AVENUE CENTURY ROAD ROSEBANK GROVE 49 256 74 14 38 51 2 12.1m 13 287 23 28 14 KING EDWARD ROAD CHATHAM ROAD 12 Chy 23 16 44 73 15 1 13.3m 39 6 40 TAVISTOCK AVENUE 16 4 36 17 279 2a Timber Shed Gnome House 252 BORWICK AVENUE 273 4a Tank (Works) 46 13 RENNESS ROAD 42 2 271 1 2 72 Ward Bdy PEMBAR AVENUE 267 28 22 269 24 41 250 River Lea or Lee Outflow Pipe 42 PH Sluice 37 33 7 2 43 26 32 34 13 35 63 10 240 19.6m 28 61 8.6m 29 Warehouse 36 25 255 30 33 1 234 111 to 107 Works 34 17.1m 35 228 RUSSELL ROAD 32 6 CR 184 60 23 33 42 SM Tank 35 Hale Wharf FARNBOROUGH AVENUE 25 20 47 22 Willowfield Humanities College 220 103 39 12 26 ETL 214 5 PALMERSTON ROAD 23 13 El 241 44 43 14 33 Sub 52 22 206 23 Sta Ward Bdy 30 12.3m CR 172 8.6m 12 59 Cassandra 1b 13 2 46 225 91 to 192 63 235 FOREST ROAD 43 65 53 13 Ward Bdy 61 186 164 62 40 12 1 2 CR 12 36 2 9a LB 13 6 178 8a 89 49 2 2 8 Warehouses 223 12 158 51 Church 1 45 176 William Morris 51a 34 152 1 Overflow 35 Multi Cultural 2 201 15.1m 52 1b 1 209 COLERIDGE ROAD 68 Centre 9 2 30 to 40 26 54 8 168 124 207 a 35 25 2a 54 11 1a 199 FB 1a 1a 148 Shelter 13 19 58 CANNING ROAD 77 57 59 32a 191 158 55 17 Bol CLIFTON AVENUE 15 1 1 25 187 189 40 9 13 152 23 52 32 COLERIDGE ROAD Boro Const, GL Asly Const 148 81 150 73 5 46 MoPs Heron 1 2 48 144a Shelter 42 134 177 71 House 144 72 to 56 1 to 2 to 1 19.6m 35 122 169 14.6m 132 26 66 167 11 142 67 122 5 159 3 32 114 1a 49 22 Century House 149 112 Mooring Posts 143 2 7 12.2m 147 4 60 69 Tottenham Locks 4 El Sub Sta 133 FOREST ROAD 14 Ward Bdy 13 CR 100 & LB Bdy 65 CR 132 14.3m 14 67 123 10 30 113 TCBs 94 109 1a 88 22 14 El Sub Sta 107 5 Shelter El Sub Sta 1 14.4m 2a 3 26 2 97 2 Lee 1 49 130 WICKFORD WAY 2 10.2m 87 5 BRISTOL PARK ROAD 13 128 or 26 55 Sluice 77 4 25 57 40 23.5m CR 9 55 34 to 52 to 34 82 65 67 6 44 63 1 El Sub Sta Car Park 13.9m 21 The 6 GREEN FERRY WAY 55 to 71 to 55 53 El Sub Sta (PH) WELLINGTON ROAD Standard 25 32 11 45a 3 38 58 8.3m 1 54 45 LB 7 101 to 129 1 13 3 5 14 2 37 River Lea 4 13 MELBOURNE ROAD 118 80 8.9m 6 48 15 35 18.9m 14 38 33 to 14 7 19 43 CR 54 8 30a ORCHARD STREET 114 Nicholson 116 21 GAINSFORD ROAD 1 to 77 3 13 TCB 26 Court 49 11.3m 12.6m HERVEY PARK ROAD Latchingdon 2 8.6m 2 21 21.4m 36 51 ICKWORTH PARK ROAD 1 Court 39 1 2 132 110 37 1 to 12 112 Thistle Court 24 30b 12 41 11 26 9 Ward Bdy 3 4 7 49b 1 to 59 108 26a El Sub Sta 9.5m 24 1 to 6 5 Angelica 6 17.3m 50 26 RITCHINGS AVENUE 1 Court Stream ESSEX CLOSE 1 1 to 6 Blackhorse Road 24 Zander 7 33 233 8 8 to 10 to 8 FOREST ROAD WALPOLE ROAD 1 Court Station (LU) 25 26 30 61 to 97 12 2 to 30 to 2 15 102 1 to 6 Garage 13 34 Avens 8.2m 13 Boundary 49 18.9m Court 1 2 25 1 to 6 ESSEX CLOSE Stone 30c Salmon 14 2 224 to 7 Court 28 232 18 1 29 LIMEWOOD CLOSE FOREST ROAD Coppermill Sloping masonry 16 38 118 LIME STREET 62 50 45 27 1 to 12 25 Def FB 29 100 Alders 37 Court 33 216 23 to 233 to 21 9.5m 2 223 248 Grayling Ct 1 to 12 8.4m 14 Valve 19 Ferry Boat Inn 59 208 to TCB 34 215 Sluice 14.4m 45 (PH) 116 13 47 1 2 9.6m Shelter 72 7 15.6m El 50 196 to 6 El Sub Sta 57 Sub Sta 207 8.5m 57 157 90 Shelter 49 7 159 35 Government Offices 108 46 153 Shelter Track 155 16 15 Ward Bdy 50 13 1 CR 10.1m 152 to 160 69 86 5 1 10 to MP 7.5 23 158 48 129 12 79 184 to 195 177 13 Builders 13 to 18 20 Willowfield 19 to 24 131 179 40 25 50 2 Yard FB STONEYDOWN AVENUE 59 DW Humanities 26 156 WARNER ROAD 13 College 12 18.0m 13 71 109 9.5m 4 4 to 9 64 172 to 183 Ward Bdy 2 15 15.3m 155 to Sluice 111 162 BLACKHORSE ROAD 2 CR 101 ELMSDALE ROAD 30 163 23 MP 7 Shelter to 106 11 El Sub Sta 186 1a 26 171 2 103 13 to 18 to 13 SUFFOLK PARK ROAD 76 22 9.8m FOREST ROAD 1 1 CLOSE 4 143 to 154 27 193 El 62 81 195 FREEDOM El Sub Sta 184 El Sub Sta Sub Sta 1 to 18 142 CLOSE 83 182 5 Tudor Mews 70 12.9m 12 to 7 BREAM CR 66 11.1m Lindenlea Court 14 DW Stoneydown House KARIM MEWS 61 79 164 207 Cycle Way 34 Boro Const, GL Asly Const & LB Bdy 9.9m 13 4 to 1 63 196 162 205 1 to 3 131 to 142 SL 156 Lee Flood Relief Channel ETL 14.5m 154 11.1m 6 to 1 1 Dagenham Brook 130 PRETORIA AVENUE 37 4 94 68 Pipe Line Track 2 28 195 39 140 6 193 ESS THE LINKS 12 138 16 11.2m 87 123 to 130 18 124 35 to 40 to 35 2 68 122 17.3m 74 7.8m 55 191 STONEYDOWN 55 Stoneydown Park 92 189 118 200 to 198 to 98 River Lea or Lee Primary School & Nursery PALMERSTON ROAD 113 114 to 122 48 to 41 7.3m Shelter 1 45 35a b 3 52 43 35 62 175 29 30 7.0m 173 33 10.3m 31 16.3m 120 19.6m 29 33 42 84 Disability Resource 33 118 Playground Stoneydown Park WARNER ROAD 52 31 13 40 159 15 9.2m Centre MP 6.75 269 171 155 157 El Sub Sta 100 9.1m 10.5m 32 1 NORTHCOTE ROAD St Michaels 23 42 Pipe Line Pipe Line HAWARDEN ROAD 98 MANSFIELD ROAD 12.7m 3 Church 2 50 54 El Sub Sta 22 14.1m 13 76 32 12 77 1 6.9m 74 81 3 79 33a 24 1a Pumping Sluice 9 Station 8.6m 1 22 Pipeline 57 135 66 Sunday 1a 1 to 21 School 1b Pipe 59 86 St Patrick's 50 El Sub Sta 17.9m Line Hewes House 52 18 247 88 Parish Club Vicarage Chy Valve 245 12 130 41 19 15.1m 44 43 5 14 to 17 to 14 78 23 MP 7.75 MARIAS GARDENS 11.2m 39 68 6 13.5m TCB 27 12a 2 66 28 8.5m 2b 12 37 26 2a 7 124 29 LONGFIELD AVENUE 8 Sluice LLOYD ROAD 6 9 48 44 El St Patrick's Catholic Primary School 90 42 46 7.2m Sub 7 Reservoir No 4 5a 1 227 133 41 225 Sta 117 5 Pipe 4 25 Line 119 2 Sluice 46 13 32 13.0m NEWPORT ROAD 10 8.4m 2 5 129 LB 9 12 7 53 to 97 1 7 3 87 104 13 1 34 89 55 93 14.3m 34 20 81 75 79 95 7 120 73 11.7m 24 9 77 91 118 207 66 16.6m 205 71 69 78 63 67 89 11 1 10 61 118 65 57 13 Stream Hardyng House 22 8 57 59 4 53 34 6 55 49 Shelter 69 100 2 51 9.1m 47 71 120 98 83 MELFORD ROAD 45 84 24 BLACKHORSE ROAD 70 1 to 18 to 1 43 86 13 to 18 to 13 25 71 8.4m 78 EDWARD ROAD 76 44 72 132 2 10 Coppermill 68 64 74 El 48 66 Callonfield 31 70 64 Sub 60 187 33 60 Track 185 6 El Sub Sta 62 35 56 45 Sta 76 62 6 85 58 Jetty 74 54 47 10 48 52 Shelter NORTHCOTE ROAD 73 44 29 1b 23 144 Track 50 42 The Limes 7 to 12 to 7 46 1a 12 1 CHEWTON ROAD 45 CORNWALLIS ROAD 87 64 146 36 77 34 13 27 13 51 Sl 21 5 8 171 52 LB 169 23 52 Reservoir No 2 50 50 24 44 71 1 24 19 Sluice BUXTON ROAD 13 1 to 6 to 1 48 63 158 7 1 14 34 13 El 25 19 28 75 Sub Sta 65 Sluice PARKHURST ROAD 48 82 to 89 71 26 Pipe Line 77 WOODVILLE ROAD 8.4m 73 47 1 8 2 68a 44 63 68b 151 CARISBROOKE 149 59 65 170 STOREY ROAD 8.0m 61 13 51 37 22 49 53 10.6m 47 4 46 41 40 56 2 2 7.0m 45 87 68 43 78 ROAD 74 29 76 11.3m 57 122 62 72 54 182 49 31 66 1 to 14 62 27 53 64 66 5 60 56 20 52 Palmerston 14 131 129 50 81 44 61 Mission Grove Court 13 30 OSBORNE GROVE 42 194 65 Primary School and OSBORNE MEWS MAUDE TERRACE 67 1 28 35 Childrens Centre 2 24a 1 26 PH COURTENAY ROAD 48 200 13.7m 15.9m 1 24 110 145 28 69 to 79 to 69 24 89 108 46a 31 1 to 4 27 12 12 1 111 43 93 41 8.9m 12 22 208 109 34 St Paul's 6 54 24 Court 143 4 97 6 2 22 4 99 141a 18 21 7.9m 22b 8.4m 50 5 4 37 5 10 35 99 2 97 Walthamstow 141 114c 16 106 MANNING ROAD 114b Baptist Church 11 30 3 114a 3 104 11.1m 114 NEWMAN ROAD 46 PALMERSTON 12 4 to 135 14 13 Cycle Way 4 87 2 85 2 8 Our Lady of the 127 TCB Rosary & St Patricks ROAD Millennium 14 RC Church 121 7 House SOUTHCOTE ROAD 22 to 94 24 25 61 26 22 38 23 MISSION GROVE 36 Oster Terrace MISSION GROVE 71 1 to 16 to 1 69 1 Presbytery 8 112 8 El 12 to 19 Sub Sta Car Park 28 55 115 110a Acanthus 110 108 57 Court SOUTHCOTE ROAD 17 101 to 117 19 to 17 Posts 84 TCB 106d Track TENBY ROAD MAUDE ROAD 11 to 1 106c 11.3m 55 1 53 106b 25 Track 106a 47 109 to 113 106 51 7.9m 1 to 25 to 1 76 to 100 102 14 1 to 4 45a Hall 10.7m 26 26 CARISBROOKE ROAD LB Multistorey Car Park 45 PRETORIA AVENUE 107 HIGH STREET 100 76 98a 100a WILLOW WALK BLACKHORSE ROAD 11 96 Loucor House 99a 9.1m 41 to 101 26 to 50 to 26 43 68 to 75 Tenby Court 99d Posts 24 Surgery 1 to 4 99 93 2 15 5 to 10 to 5 Tenby 95 Court 22 Car Park 91 86 1 TCB 13.6m 39 87 89 51 to 67 to 51 BUXTON RD Henley Lodge 66 16 76 11 to 18 to 11 FB 13 13 74 2 75a 1 to 18 72 87 77 5 70 33 MISSION GROVE Sl Well Massey FB 7.8m Court 75 11.4m 75 PH 73 El Sub Sta 25 1 to 9 15.1m 79 58b 67 62 64a 81 10 60 Valve Tower 58a 24 Olive 37 1 GLENTHORNE ROAD Joseph 1 to 8 65 54 Court Ward Bdy 43 Court 52b 61 Club 36 52a 23 52 56 49 21 1 to 9 SL 50 CR Glyn 1a Sheila 51 39 Reynolds 54 Court EDWARD ROAD 11.3m 48 2 House 49 14.6m 61 47 46 CRANBROOK MEWS 52 1 43 45 13.4m 35 Car Park 11.4m Track 41 60 39 El 48 71 19 PO Sub Sta 13 37 11.3m 35 13 31 34 33 44 2 72 31 to 29 32 10.2m 27 36 25 PCs 46 COURTENAY PL 1 Dagenham Brook 13 84 1 to 16 14 HIGH STREET 7.5m 19 22 Shelter 37 St James 12.2m 29 SL TCB 38 Apartments 12 28 7 to 17 49 Posts Longfield House 1 TCBs El Sub Sta 33 1 to 36 HAZELWOOD ROAD 40 35 36 SL Reservoir No 1 61 10.6m 3 SP Lorry Park 2 32 1 2 Coppermill Stream 52 El Sub Sta 28 73 56 2 to 4 2 Lee Flood Relief Channel COURTENAY MEWS Posts 1b 68 12 7 87 TCB 1 Subway LB 1 22 11 8.4m 80 Shelter Games Court 13 Library 22 10 17 18 14 to 1 14.4m 32 13 Car Park HAROLDSTONE ROAD 8.8m 92 COURTENAY PLACE 68 to 71 El Sub Sta 27 El Sub Sta 9 4 72 44 2 12 39 73 74 SIDE ROAD 23 to 15 11.6m Coppermill El Sub Sta 13 12 8 23 75 1 to 49 Primary School St James Street Station 51 22 Track 56 1 to 9 El Alpha Business Centre 34 24 Sub Sta 1 1 20 24 to 32 to 24 COPPERMILL LANE 3 76
Recommended publications
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD

    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD

    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation
  • Leyton Jubilee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction

    Leyton Jubilee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction

    http://mspweb.walthamforest.gov.uk/Planning/lg/GFPlanningDocumen... 1 0 JAN 2013 London Borough of Wnltham Forest Leyton Jubilee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction Flood Risl< Assessmen t Highways Mainlenance Group Euvirotunen(al Services LONDON SOUROUGH WALTBAM FOREST Low Hall Depol Argall Avenue Lcylon London E I07AS 1 of 1 23/02/2013 15:19 http://mspweb.walthamforest.gov.uk/Planning/lg/GFPlanningDocumen... ~·!}\( :~ ~ . DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Project Name Leyton Jubi ee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction Project TUie Rood Risk Assessment OS Map Rei 537076 E. 186955 N Location Le'yton E17 Orgamsat1on Contact Date Copms Waltham Forest A Prud'homme 24/12/12 1 1 of 1 23/02/2013 15:20 http://mspweb.walthamforest.gov.uk/Planning/lg/GFPlanningDocumen... Leyton Jubilee Park I Marsh Lane Bridge Reconstruction Flood Risk Assessment Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 1 2.0 Location 1 3.0 Geographical Area 1 4.0 Environmont Agency Requirement 2 5.0 Available Information 4 6.0 Flood Risk at Bridge Location 5 7.0 W alkover Survey 5 7.1 Habilats 5 7.2 Protected and Notable Species 5 7.3 Invasive Species 6 8.0 Topographical survey 6 9.0 Utilities Survey 6 10.0 Habitat Survey and Protectod Spoclos Assossment 6 11.0 Flood Risk Assessment, Footbridge Dovelopment and Constrain!$ 7 11.1 Flood Zone 7 11.2 Appropriate uses 7 11 .3 Dimensional Requirements of the Proposed Footbridge 7 11.4 Watercourse Reprofiling and Clearances 8 11.5 Flood Risk AsseSSI)lont and Mitigation 8 Appendices AppendiM A - Drawing No: A308·FRA·01 • Topographical Survey -Drawing No.
  • Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Character Assessment

    Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Character Assessment

    LCT C: Urban Valley Floor with Marshlands SPA, which provides a nationally important habitat for overwintering birds. Cultural Influences 4.64 The low-lying land of rich alluvial deposits supported a system of grazing, referred to as the Lammas system5 from the Anglo-Saxon period to the end of the C19th. Grazing rights on the marshes were extinguished by the early C20th and a substantial proportion of the marshlands, with the exception of Walthamstow Marshes, were then modified by industrial activities and landfill, including the dumping of bomb rubble after WW2. In the 1950 and 60s the construction of flood relief channels ended the periodic inundation of the marshlands. 4.65 Communication routes through the valley floor proliferated over the C20th, including pylons, roads and railway lines mounted on embankments, but residential and industrial development remains largely confined to the margins. 4.66 Public access and recreation now characterises much of the marshlands, with some areas managed as nature reserves. However substantial infrastructure, such as the railway lines and flood relief channels and adjacent industrial development, means access through and into the marshes from surrounding urban areas is often severed. The tow-path following the River Lee Navigation provides a continuous link along the valley for visitors to enjoy the landscape. 5 A system of grazing whereby cattle was grazed only after the cutting and collection of hay Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Strategy 85 April 2019 LCA C1: Rammey Marsh Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Strategy 86 April 2019 LCA C1: Rammey Marsh Occasional long views out to wooded valley sides between Residential properties overlooking the southern area across the riverside vegetation.
  • Thameswater Tida L T Hames Defence Levels Preliminary Report on River Lee Flows and Levels

    Thameswater Tida L T Hames Defence Levels Preliminary Report on River Lee Flows and Levels

    ThamesWater Tida l T hames Defence Levels Preliminary Report on River Lee Flows and Levels August 1987 A R CHI VE : PLEA SE D O N OT DES TR O Y ThamesWater Tidal T ha mes Defe nce Levels Preliminary Report on River Lee Flows and Levels August 1987 Sir William Ha !crow & Partners Ltd Institute of Hydrology PREL IMINARY RIVER LEE ANALYSIS CONTENT S Page No GLOSSARY SUMMA RY 1. INTRODUCT ION 1 1.1 Objectives 1 1.2 The Lower River Lee Sys tem , 1 1.3 Da ta Availability 2 2 . DATA COLLECT ION 3 2.1 Tida l Wa ter Level Data 3 2 .2 Flood Da ta for the Lower Lee and Tribu taries 3 2 .3 Sub-catchment Area s 3 2 .4 Urban Area s 4 3 . TR END ANALYSES 5 3 .1 Water Leve l Trend s 5 3 .2 Flood Trend s 5 4 . FREQUENCY ANA LY SES OF T IDAL WATER LEVELS 6 4 .1 Frequen cy of Tida l Wa ter Leve ls 6 4 .2 Adj ustment to Lee Mouth 6 7 . FLOOD FREQUENC IES AT RIV ER GAUGING STAT IONS ON THE LOW ER LEE 7 5 .1 General Approach 7 5.2 Flood Frequencies Based on Data Ana lyses 7 5.3 Flood Frequencies Using FSR P rocedures 8 5.4 Propo sed Flood Frequenc ies for Ga uging Station s 9 6 . FLOOD FREQUENC IES IN LOW ER LEE CHA NNELS 10 6 .1 Flood Freq uencies in Lee Flood Relie f Channe l 10 6 .2 Flood Frequenc ies in Lee Nav iga tion Chan ne l 11 FIGURES 1.1 Diagramma tic Sys tem o f the Lower Lee 3.1 Flood Trends 4 .1 Concurren t Peak Water Leve ls at Brunsw ick Wha rf and Tow er P ier 5 .1 Feildes Weir Con current Flood s , Instan taneous and Mean Da ily 5.2 Flood Frequency Ana ly ses 5.3 G row th Fac to rs fo r Main Lee 5.4 G rowth Fac tors fo r Low er Lee Tributaries
  • London in the Thames Catchment

    London in the Thames Catchment

    NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED London in the Thames catchment Business Case: Flood Risk and the six year investment programme London in the Thames catchment 1. Summary, Headline facts and statistics London’s flood risk Surface Water Rivers/Sea Residential Non Total Residential Non Total residential residential High 59,000 7,000 66,000 11,000 3,000 14,000 Medium 96,000 13,000 109,000 29,000 5,000 34,000 Low 445,000 54,000 499,000 423,000 56,000 485,000 Total at 600,000 74,000 674,000 465,000 65,000 536,000 risk The Six Year Investment Programme The Thames Regional Flood & Coastal Committee decide (RFCC) which projects make up the programme. The allocation of central Government funding to the projects is based on Defra Policy. £180m of Flood Defence Grant in Aid (FD GiA) investment planned in the Thames Estuary to maintain the World Class standard of protection for London from tidal flooding. £77m of FD GiA investment within London in the next six years to directly protect 10,000 properties from tidal flooding £36m of FD GiA investment planned to reduce the risk of river and surface water flooding to 6,800 properties in London At least £25m of contributions are required to unlock all of this investment over the next six years. Levy provides a mechanism for local authorities to pool resources to achieve this. The return on the investment in flood risk management is high. Within Thames the average benefit to cost ratio’s for schemes within the six year investment programme are; Protecting London from tidal flooding: 117:1 Reducing the risk from river flooding: 10:1 Reducing the risk from surface water flooding: 7:1 Levy The levy is used only to part-fund capital projects led by either local authorities or the Environment Agency.
  • Water Quality Analysis of the River Lee and Major Tributaries Within the Perimeter of the M25, from Waltham Abbey to Bow Locks

    Water Quality Analysis of the River Lee and Major Tributaries Within the Perimeter of the M25, from Waltham Abbey to Bow Locks

    A water quality analysis of the River Lee and major tributaries within the perimeter of the M25, from Waltham Abbey to Bow Locks. Client: Thames21 Consultant: Grieg R Davies Water sampling and analyses dates: 22 November – 04 December 2011 Date issued: 13 December 2011 Executive summary This report was commissioned to assess the biological, physical and chemical water quality of the London River Lee and its main tributaries within the M25 perimeter, from the M25 near Waltham Abbey to Bow Locks in Bow, London. A pilot water quality investigation was developed to assess 38 sites within seven watercourses, including the London River Lee. Common physical and chemical water quality parameters were measured in the field and analysed by means of representative samples in a laboratory. Samples and measurements were taken during a period of ‘reference’ water levels within the watercourses. Results were compared and analysed against existing water quality classifications from the EU Water Framework Directive amongst others. The investigation determined that the overall water quality within the London River Lee and its tributaries is very poor. Excessive concentrations of reactive phosphate (orthophosphate) in combination with low saturation of dissolved oxygen were common place within many of the sampled sites, as well as high counts of total coliforms and the presence of considerable levels of faecal coliforms. Values for chemical oxygen demand were also found to be excessively high within the majority of sample sites. A simple water quality index determined that the most deteriorated watercourse in the investigation was Stonebridge Brook, while the most deteriorated sample sites were located on the Pymmes Brook and Salmons Brook.
  • River Lee Floods

    River Lee Floods

    El A- Box ^ 1947 RIVER LEE FLOODS YEARS50 ON River Lee Catchment Area Showing Land Liable To Flood (based on extent of 1947 flooding) River Lee Catchment Area Chingford River Thames 8B& S3B Land Liable to Flood Main Rivers Stratford Hackney River Lee Navigation Hertford Union C aul Central London River Lee Flood Relief Channel Thames Barrier Urban area Major roads Minor roads 5 Km £ £A - f (.eo^L I w X CONTENTS page Introduction 1 The Nature of Flooding 1 ® L Responsibility for Managing Flood Protection in the Lee Valley The 1947 Flood Damage Caused by th e Flood r - Transport, Communications and Services 3 - Property 3 Flood Protection Measures - Prior to the 1947 Flood 3 Fig 1 Proposed river improvements in Stratford (1930) 4 Flood Protection Measures - Following the 1947 Flood 5 / 6 / 7 Table 1 Flow Control Structures on the River Lee Flood R elief Channel The Future of Flood Defence in the Lee Valley Appendix I Damage to Property from the 1947 Flood Appendix II References and Acknowledgments 10 Appendix III Working diagrams of: Labyrinth/Folded Weirs 11 Vertical Lift Gates 12 Radial Gates 13 Siphon Spillways 14 Map 1 The River Lee Catchment Area (including the Area Liable to Flood) Inside front cover Map 2 The River Lee Flood R elief Channel (including the location of flow control structures) Inside back cover Front cover River Lee flooding effecting Lee Bridge Rd. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Note: Not all photographs in this document are of the 1947 flood, however, pictures are indicative of that event. Environment Agency 1947 River Lee Floods - SO Years On 1 INTRODUCTION 3 RESPONSIBILITY FOR FLOOD PROTECTION IN THE LEE VALLEY 1997 marks the 50th anniversary of one of the River Lee’s most damaging floods.
  • Strategic Policy Framework of the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority G

    Strategic Policy Framework of the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority G

    he following organisations all formally endorse the policies contained in this T Part One of the Park Plan he Regional Park Authority also acknowledges the involvement and T support of the many other organisations who have taken part in preparing the Park Plan. CONTACT ADDRESS: All enquiries relating to this Part One: Strategic Policy Framework of the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority’s Park Plan should be addressed to: Gillian Morgan Senior Planning and Development Officer Lee Valley Regional Park Authority Myddelton House Bulls Cross Enfield Middx. EN2 9HG Tel: 01992 717711 Fax: 01992 788623 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 09501433 9 1 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Foreword By the Chairman of the Authority his latest plan for the future development Part Two of the Plan, the Land Use Proposals, of the Lee Valley Regional Park differs in will put flesh on the bones of this Policy Framework T format from its predecessors in that its and the Authority’s strategic Business Plan will two main sections, the Policy Framework and the establish priorities, determine deadlines and ensure Land Use Proposals are published separately. resources are available so that plans do not remain There are a number of reasons for this, the most plans, but progress into realities. compelling being that we live in a changing world and must recognise that a change in the circumstances that affect the development of the Regional Park may call for a change in policy. Equally, in the context of an overall Policy Framework, the proposed use for particular sites might change again due to changing circumstances.
  • Water Quality and Ecology of the River Lee: Mass Balance and a Review of Temporal and Spatial Data

    Water Quality and Ecology of the River Lee: Mass Balance and a Review of Temporal and Spatial Data

    HydrologyDeborah L. and Snook Earth and System Paul G. Sciences, Whitehead 8(4), 636650 (2004) © EGU Water quality and ecology of the River Lee: mass balance and a review of temporal and spatial data Deborah L. Snook and Paul G. Whitehead Aquatic Environment Research Centre, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AB, UK Email for corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract A regional overview of the water quality and ecology of the River Lee catchment is presented. Specifically, data describing the chemical, microbiological and macrobiological water quality and fisheries communities have been analysed, based on a division into river, sewage treatment works, fish-farm, lake and industrial samples. Nutrient enrichment and the highest concentrations of metals and micro-organics were found in the urbanised, lower reaches of the Lee and in the Lee Navigation. Average annual concentrations of metals were generally within environmental quality standards although, on many occasions, concentrations of cadmium, copper, lead, mercury and zinc were in excess of the standards. Various organic substances (used as herbicides, fungicides, insecticides, chlorination by-products and industrial solvents) were widely detected in the Lee system. Concentrations of ten micro-organic substances were observed in excess of their environmental quality standards, though not in terms of annual averages. Sewage treatment works were the principal point source input of nutrients, metals and micro-organic determinands to the catchment. Diffuse nitrogen sources contributed approximately 60% and 27% of the in-stream load in the upper and lower Lee respectively, whereas approximately 60% and 20% of the in-stream phosphorus load was derived from diffuse sources in the upper and lower Lee.
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary

    Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary

    London Borough of Waltham Forest LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Summary Document October 2013 Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary 1 Introduction 1 2 Partner responsibilities 1 3 What do we know about flooding in the borough? 3 4 Main aims of the strategy 9 5 Funding 10 6 How will flood risk management schemes be prioritised? 10 7 Consultation questions 12 8 Glossary 13 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary 1 Introduction 1.1 The Government has recently given local authorities new powers to manage local flood risk in a more co-ordinated way. As a ‘Lead Local Flood Authority’, the Council's responsibilities relate to ‘local’ flood risk from surface water, groundwater and small rivers, streams and ditches. Flooding from main rivers remains the responsibility of the Environment Agency. 1.2 As a ‘Lead Local Flood Authority’ it is a legal requirement under the Flood and Water Management Act that we produce a Local Flood Risk Management Strategy that: Provides an overview of flood risk management work being undertaken and planned throughout the borough; Outlines how we are working with partners to reduce flood risk; Clearly sets out which organisations are responsible for different types of flooding in the borough; Is in accordance with the National Flood and Coastal Erosion Management Strategy. 1.3 The rise in extreme weather conditions, the presence of existing buildings in areas of flood risk, and limited public funding, means that we cannot stop all flood incidents happening in the borough. However, through the strategy we can co-ordinate services so that flood risk is reduced and the aftermath of any flood incidents is minimised.
  • Group Agenda

    Group Agenda

    London Councils’ Transport & Environment Committee Thursday 14 June 2018 Supplementary Agenda 2:30pm in the Conference Suite, London Councils, 59½ Southwark Street, London SE1 0AL Labour Group: Meeting Room 4 at 1.30pm Conservative Group: Meeting Room 1 at 1.30pm Liberal Democrat Group: Meeting Room 8 at 1.30pm Tel: 020 7934 9911 Contact Officer: Alan Edwards Email: [email protected] Supplementary Agenda Papers 7 Electric Vehicle Rapid Charging-Point Sub Group 12 Funding Flood Alleviation in London 16 Direct Vision Standard for Heavy Goods Vehicles Update 17 Taxicard Update 18 Freedom Pass Progress Report London Councils’ Transport and Environment Committee Electric Vehicle Rapid Charging-Point Item Sub Group No: 07 Report by: Alan Edwards Job title: Governance Manager Date: 14 June 2018 Contact Alan Edwards Officer: Telephone: 020 7934 9911 Email: [email protected] Summary: This report sets out the arrangements for the Electric Vehicle Rapid Charging-Point Sub Group (EV Rapid Charging-Point Sub Group or EVRCP). The EVRCP Terms of Reference can be found at Appendix A of this report. Recommendations: The Committee is asked to: Review the membership of the EV Rapid Charging-Point Sub Group for the municipal year for 2018/19; and Note the report and approve the EV Rapid Charging-Point Terms of Reference at Appendix A. Background 1. The increase in electric vehicle rapid charging points is an important element of the Go Ultra Low City Scheme (GULCS) jointly delivered by TfL, the GLA and London Councils. In response to concerns about the rate of installation of rapid charging points and consistent with a recommendation of the 20 March 2018 Leaders’ Committee, this Committee on 22 March 2018 agreed to set up a Member-level EV Rapid Charging-Point Sub Group.
  • Group Agenda

    Group Agenda

    London Councils’ Transport and Environment Committee Thursday 12 October 2017 2.30pm in the Conference Suite, London Councils, 59½ Southwark Street, London, SE1 0AL Labour Group: Meeting Room 4 at 1.00pm (1st Floor) Conservative Group: Meeting Room 1 at 1.30pm (1st Floor) Telephone: 020 7934 9911 Contact Officer: Alan Edwards Email: [email protected] Agenda Items 1 Apologies for Absence and Announcement of Deputies - 2 Declarations of Interest* 3 Mayor’s Environment Strategy – Introduction by Shirley Rodrigues, Deputy Mayor for Environment, GLA 4 Response to Mayor’s Draft Transport Strategy – Val Shawcross, Deputy Mayor for Transport, GLA, will be available to answer any questions 5 Local Implementation Plan Guidance Response – Val Shawcross will be available to answer any questions. 6 Flooding Report – Introduction of the new Chair of the Thames Regional Flood & Coastal Committee 7 Chair’s Report 8 GLC Parks Byelaws – Setting Penalty Levels 9 Proposed Freedom Pass Settlement Adjustment for Rail Network Withdrawn Disruption 10 Direct Vision Standard for Heavy Goods Vehicles 11 Social Needs Transport – Proposed Personal Travel Budget Pilot To Follow 12 Code of Practice for Parking Enforcement Part 2 To Follow 13 TfL Consultation on Penalty Charge Levels 14 Re-Appointment of Environment Traffic Adjudicators 15 Environment & Traffic Adjudicators’ Annual Report 2016/17 16 TEC Constitutional Matters (D Dent) 17 Minutes of the TEC Executive Sub Committee held on 15 September 2017 (for noting) 18 Minutes of the TEC Main Meeting held