DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Policy Framework of the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Policy Framework of the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority G he following organisations all formally endorse the policies contained in this T Part One of the Park Plan he Regional Park Authority also acknowledges the involvement and T support of the many other organisations who have taken part in preparing the Park Plan. CONTACT ADDRESS: All enquiries relating to this Part One: Strategic Policy Framework of the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority’s Park Plan should be addressed to: Gillian Morgan Senior Planning and Development Officer Lee Valley Regional Park Authority Myddelton House Bulls Cross Enfield Middx. EN2 9HG Tel: 01992 717711 Fax: 01992 788623 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 09501433 9 1 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Foreword By the Chairman of the Authority his latest plan for the future development Part Two of the Plan, the Land Use Proposals, of the Lee Valley Regional Park differs in will put flesh on the bones of this Policy Framework T format from its predecessors in that its and the Authority’s strategic Business Plan will two main sections, the Policy Framework and the establish priorities, determine deadlines and ensure Land Use Proposals are published separately. resources are available so that plans do not remain There are a number of reasons for this, the most plans, but progress into realities. compelling being that we live in a changing world and must recognise that a change in the circumstances that affect the development of the Regional Park may call for a change in policy. Equally, in the context of an overall Policy Framework, the proposed use for particular sites might change again due to changing circumstances. Anne Mallinson The separation of the two main sections enables Chairman, Lee Valley Regional Park Authority the Authority to reflect its flexibility and sensitivity to change and presents it with the opportunity to keep the Plan up to date as and when fundamental changes occur. This Part One of the new Plan outlines the Objectives and Policies that will enable the Authority to realise its Vision for the Regional Park. A Vision that translates its basic remit as defined in the establishing Act into meaningful, tangible goals for the benefit of the region’s population. A Vision that others can share in and contribute to by embracing the Objectives and Policies outlined here and by pursuing them as vigorously as the Authority will. Our attention will increasingly be focused on utilising to the full the unique physical and natural resources within the Regional Park, particularly the areas of open water. We will remain vigilant and determined in protecting the Park from unsuitable development and look for every opportunity to bring land into use for leisure and recreation. Foreword By the Chairman of the Plan Review Committee he process of reviewing the 1986 Park The procedures for consultation and involving the Plan has been a lengthy and painstaking community in the development of this final Policy T one so, arriving at this Part One, Policy Framework mirrored, as far as was practicable, Framework, has not been without its challenges. those followed by local planning authorities for But it has been an absorbing and instructive local plans. Meetings and discussions were held exercise too, in which Members have had not only with relevant statutory bodies, local authorities to immerse themselves in the Regional Park itself, and national and regional organisations, including getting to know practically every nook and cranny, residents groups. Their views and responses were but also to gain a clear understanding of the wider analysed and considered and where appropriate, picture of leisure provision and nature conservation revisions were made. The resulting “Deposit” Park in the region. It was only through such thorough Plan, Part One was formally placed on deposit in investigation that the Authority felt it could be clear July 1997 for a 12 week period. Nearly 1,500 and certain about its role in relation to other bodies representations were received within the and its proposed future development strategy for consultation period, mainly expressions of support the Regional Park. and endorsement. However, following consideration of the responses, the Plan Review Committee The very first task was to identify the most agreed to amend several Objectives and Policies. important issues which needed to be addressed The draft was then placed on deposit for a further by the Park Plan Review. These were determined six week period from the end of January 1998, by conducting a series of topic studies on a wide and general agreement obtained. variety of subjects relevant to the future development of the Park. These topics fell into Finally, on 23rd April 1998 the Part One Document one of three subject categories: Leisure Activities, was approved unanimously at a meeting of the full Physical Resources and Environmental Park Authority. The Objectives and Policies set out Considerations. The individual topic studies here have been adopted as the Strategic Policy were analysed and collectively summarised into Guidance for the future planning and development the Position Statement, which identified common of the Regional Park. Members hope that the Vision threads and particular needs and opportunities. which has informed their discussions over the past These were then consulted upon and discussed in period will guide, enhance and protect the Regional depth with relevant local authorities and regional Park for the future. bodies to gain their views and input, thus enabling the Plan Review Committee finally to arrive at the Key Issues and Objectives, Then the really hard work began; that of developing and drafting policies to address the Issues and Objectives. Both in committee and Mrs. Eileen Kinnear outside, Members and Officers discussed, debated, Chairman, Plan Review Committee even argued. Policies were formulated, scrutinized, reviewed and re-formulated. Slowly but surely a “Draft” Policy Framework emerged which was ready to be published for consultation. Lee ValleyRegional Park Park Plan Part One:STRATEGIC POLICY FRAMEWORK SECTION ONE Introduction Page Number The Vision 3 Chapter 1 The Lee Valley Regional Park 5 Chapter 2 Core Values and Key Issues 13 SECTION TWO Resources Chapter 3 Introduction to Resources 21 Chapter 4 Land Resource 27 Chapter 5 Landscape 39 Chapter 6 Nature Conservation 53 Chapter 7 Water 67 Chapter 8 Culture and Heritage Resource 79 SECTION THREE Visitor Enjoyment Chapter 9 Introduction to Activities 89 Chapter 10 Water Recreation 95 Chapter 11 Informal Recreation 111 Chapter 12 Formal Recreation 123 Chapter 13 Culture and Heritage 133 Chapter 14 Tourism and the Visitor 141 SECTION FOUR Achieving the Vision Chapter 15 Introduction to Implementation and Evaluation 157 Chapter 16 Implementation 159 Chapter 17 Evaluation 165 Glossary 169 Index 175 Index to Key Diagrams 181 Lee Valley Regional Park Plan Part One: Strategic Policy Framework SECTION ONE SECTION ONE Introduction Page Number The Vision 3 Chapter 1 The Lee Valley Regional Park 5 Chapter 2 Core Values and Key Issues 13 1 Lee Valley Regional Park Plan Part One: Strategic Policy Framework SECTION ONE 2 Lee Valley Regional Park Plan Part One: Strategic Policy Framework The document is designed to be used not only by the Park Authority but by all those who live, work The Vision and operate within the Regional Park. The Park Authority will therefore not only seek to implement The Vision For the the objectives and policies itself, but will also seek Regional Park to have them implemented through the activities and actions of other organisations and individuals. ● To be a cohesive, sustainable and valued regional green lung. By outlining the Vision for the Regional Park in Part SECTION ONE One it is hoped that the objectives and policies will ● To be an area of enhanced and protected influence new development, statutory documents natural bio-diversity for the enjoyment of all. and planning applications to create a Regional Park ● To achieve full utilisation of the unique land with an image and identity that transcends local and water assets of the Regional Park for authority boundaries. specialist leisure and recreational facilities developed in accordance with principles of The Role of the sustainability and design excellence. ● To be an accessible and permeable, integrated Park Authority visitor attraction to serve the region which will The Park Authority was established to lead in the include local communities. development of the Regional Park in recognition of the complexity of the Valley for it was thought that: The Vision expresses desirable characteristics “only by single-minded dedication could the objects of the Regional Park and is the basis on which of the exercise be achieved”. (Civic Trust 1964). decisions about the planning and development of The Authority still believes in its role to lead, the Park will be made. The Authority would hope innovate and make creative provision for the that landowners, local authorities and different region's leisure. Through the Park Plan, the communities of interest can share this common Authority seeks to identify the most effective purpose of the Park's protection and development ways to use its powers to enable and encourage and adopt the agreed Vision themselves. other partners to provide for leisure, to acquire land and to continue its management role. The Role of Part One The Park Authority is not a development control of the Park Plan agency and the Park Plan is not a local development It is a statutory duty of the Lee Valley Regional plan. Proposed development and activities within Park Authority to produce a plan of proposals for the Regional Park must therefore comply with the the future use and development of the Regional requirements of the local authorities’ development Park. The Park Plan consists of two parts, plans and where necessary planning permission published separately.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report on Natural Features
    NORTH LONDON WASTE AUTHORITY NORTH LONDON HEAT AND POWER PROJECT REPORT ON NATURAL FEATURES The Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Regulation 5 (2) (l) AD05.16 Arup Revision 0 October 2015 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. North London Waste Authority North London Heat and Power Project Report on Natural Features Contents Page Executive summary 1 1 Introduction 2 1.2 Purpose of this report 2 1.3 Document structure 2 1.4 The Applicant 3 1.5 The Application Site 3 1.6 Surrounding area 5 1.7 The Project 6 1.8 Stages of development 10 2 Scope of natural features considered 17 3 Methodology for the assessment of effects 20 4 Assessment of effects 21 4.1 Statutory sites and features of nature conservation 21 4.2 Non-statutory sites and features of nature conservation 23 4.3 Sites of landscape importance 23 4.4 Habitats of protected species 24 4.5 Water bodies in a river basin management plan 26 5 Conclusion 29 Appendices Appendix A : Plan showing the natural features in the vicinity of the Application Site A.1 Glossary Refer to Project Glossary (AD01.05) AD05.16 | Issue | October 2015 | Arup North London Waste Authority North London Heat and Power Project Report on Natural Features Executive summary i.i.i A Report on Natural Features has been prepared to support North London Waste Authority’s (the Applicant’s) application (the Application) for a Development Consent Order (DCO) made pursuant to the Planning Act 2008 (as amended) for the North London Heat and Power Project (the Project).
    [Show full text]
  • 36 Highbridge Street, Waltham Abbey
    36 HIGHBRIDGE STREET, WALTHAM ABBEY Flood Risk Assessment and Surface Water Drainage Statement Alcomax (Investments) Ltd SLR Ref: 408-07833-00001 Version No: 5 October 2018 36 Highbridge Street, Waltham Abbey : FRA and SWDS Filename: 181017_408-07833-00001_36HSWA_FRA_v5 SLR Ref No: 408-07833-00001 October 2018 BASIS OF REPORT This document has been prepared by SLR Consulting Limited with reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with Alcomax (Investments) Ltd. (the Client) as part or all of the services it has been appointed by the Client to carry out. It is subject to the terms and conditions of that appointment. SLR shall not be liable for the use of or reliance on any information, advice, recommendations and opinions in this document for any purpose by any person other than the Client. Reliance may be granted to a third party only in the event that SLR and the third party have executed a reliance agreement or collateral warranty. Information reported herein may be based on the interpretation of public domain data collected by SLR, and/or information supplied by the Client and/or its other advisors and associates. These data have been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. The copyright and intellectual property in all drawings, reports, specifications, bills of quantities, calculations and other information set out in this report remain vested in SLR unless the terms of appointment state otherwise. This document may contain information of a specialised and/or highly technical nature and the Client is advised to seek clarification on any elements which may be unclear to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Enfield Characterisation Study
    eld Characterisation Study | Final Report | February 2011 fi En 5.128 ENFIELD’S P P LACES 129 Enfi eld Characterisation Study | Final Report | February 2011 ENFIELD’S PLACES Enfi eld is not a single homogenous place. As a counterpoint to these radial development Rather, it is a collection of separate and distinct zones, there is also an overlying east-west places with their own origins. Although these corridor which can be applied to describe places may have coalesced over time, they still the infl uence of the North Circular Road on retain their own identity and character. This the areas to either side. As with the Western can be seen in the types of street pattern corridor, areas such as Bounds Green overlap and architecture, the structure of centres and the formal borough boundary, leading to a focal points and the names used to describe blurring of identity. the various locations. This is a distinctive Finally, to the north of the urban area lies the characteristic of the village origins of much green belt, a mixture of farmland, parkland, of London. In each case the history of the commercial areas and leisure uses. origins and growth of a place are crucial to the establishment of the later character, with This element of work has been informed by a elements such as the construction of rail and workshop with local stakeholders drawn from tube lines playing a major role in creating new across the borough. The plan laid out here suburbs which have a profound and lasting draws on the discussions about the various imprint on the area.
    [Show full text]
  • © Georgina Green ~ Epping Forest Though the Ages
    © Georgina Green ~ Epping Forest though the Ages Epping Forest Preface On 6th May 1882 Queen Victoria visited High Beach where she declared through the Ages "it gives me the greatest satisfaction to dedicate this beautiful Forest to the use and enjoyment of my people for all time" . This royal visit was greeted with great enthusiasm by the thousands of people who came to see their by Queen when she passed by, as their forefathers had done for other sovereigns down through the ages . Georgina Green My purpose in writing this little book is to tell how the ordinary people have used Epping Fo rest in the past, but came to enjoy it only in more recent times. I hope to give the reader a glimpse of what life was like for those who have lived here throughout the ages and how, by using the Forest, they have physically changed it over the centuries. The Romans, Saxons and Normans have each played their part, while the Forest we know today is one of the few surviving examples of Medieval woodland management. The Tudor monarchs and their courtiers frequently visited the Forest, wh ile in the 18th century the grandeur of Wanstead House attracted sight-seers from far and wide. The common people, meanwhile, were mostly poor farm labourers who were glad of the free produce they could obtain from the Forest. None of the Forest ponds are natural . some of them having been made accidentally when sand and gravel were extracted . while others were made by Man for a variety of reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Read, Simon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-5130 (2017) Cinderella River: The evolving narrative of the River Lee. http://hydrocitizenship.com, London, pp. 1-163. [Book] Published version (with publisher’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/23299/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterway Dimensions
    Generated by waterscape.com Dimension Data The data published in this documentis British Waterways’ estimate of the dimensions of our waterways based upon local knowledge and expertise. Whilst British Waterways anticipates that this data is reasonably accurate, we cannot guarantee its precision. Therefore, this data should only be used as a helpful guide and you should always use your own judgement taking into account local circumstances at any particular time. Aire & Calder Navigation Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Bulholme Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 6.3m 2.74m - - 20.67ft 8.99ft - Castleford Lock is limiting due to the curvature of the lock chamber. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Castleford Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom 61m - - - 200.13ft - - - Heck Road Bridge is now lower than Stubbs Bridge (investigations underway), which was previously limiting. A height of 3.6m at Heck should be seen as maximum at the crown during normal water level. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Heck Road Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.71m - - - 12.17ft - 1 - Generated by waterscape.com Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Leeds Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.5m 2.68m - - 18.04ft 8.79ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m. Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Crown Point Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.62m - - - 11.88ft Crown Point Bridge at summer levels Wakefield Branch - Broadreach Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.55m 2.7m - - 18.21ft 8.86ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m.
    [Show full text]
  • Rye Meads Water Cycle Study\F-Reports\Phase 3\5003-Bm01390-Bmr-18 Water Cycle Strategy Final Report.Doc
    STEVENAGE BOROUGH COUNCIL RYE MEADS WATER CYCLE STRATEGY DETAILED STUDY REPORT FINAL REPORT Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited 2212959 Aston Cross Business Village 50Rocky Lane Aston Birmingham B6 5RQ United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)870 000 3007 Fax: +44 (0)870 000 3907 www.hyderconsulting.com STEVENAGE BOROUGH COUNCIL RYE MEADS WATER CYCLE STRATEGY DETAILED STUDY REPORT FINAL REPORT James Latham/ Dan Author Vogtlin Checker Renuka Gunasekara Approver Mike Irwin Report No 5003-BM01390-BMR-18-Water Cycle Strategy Final Report Date 5th October 2009 This report has been prepared for STEVENAGE BOROUGH COUNCIL in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for WATER CYCLE STRATEGY dated April 2008. Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited (2212959) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. RYE MEADS WATER CYCLE STRATEGY—DETAILED STUDY REPORT Hyder Consulting (UK) Limited-2212959 k:\bm01390- rye meads water cycle study\f-reports\phase 3\5003-bm01390-bmr-18 water cycle strategy final report.doc Revisions Prepared Approved Revision Date Description By By - 2/10/2008 Draft Report Structure JL 1 18/11/2008 First Report Draft JL/DV MI 2 27/01/2009 Draft Report JL/DV MI 3-13 03/04/2009 Final Draft Report as amended by stakeholder comments JL/DV RG 14 09/07/2009 Final Draft Report JL/DV RG 15 10/07/2009 Final Draft Report Redacted JL/DV RG 16 21/08/2009 Final Draft Report JL/DV RG 17 21/09/2009 Final Draft following core project team meeting comments JL/DV RG 18 05/10/2009 Final Report JL/DV MI RYE MEADS WATER CYCLE STRATEGY—DETAILED STUDY REPORT Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd-2212959 k:\bm01390- rye meads water cycle study\f-reports\phase 3\5003-bm01390-bmr-18 water cycle strategy final report.doc CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Summary of Key Outcomes ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thames River Basin Management Plan, Including Local Development Documents and Sustainable Community Strategies ( Local Authorities)
    River Basin Management Plan Thames River Basin District Contact us You can contact us in any of these ways: • email at [email protected] • phone on 08708 506506 • post to Environment Agency (Thames Region), Thames Regional Office, Kings Meadow House, Kings Meadow Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 8DQ The Environment Agency website holds the river basin management plans for England and Wales, and a range of other information about the environment, river basin management planning and the Water Framework Directive. www.environment-agency.gov.uk/wfd You can search maps for information related to this plan by using ‘What’s In Your Backyard’. http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/maps. Published by: Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4UD tel: 08708 506506 email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency Some of the information used on the maps was created using information supplied by the Geological Survey and/or the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and/or the UK Hydrographic Office All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, Thames River Basin District 2 December 2009 Contents This plan at a glance 5 1 About this plan 6 2 About the Thames River Basin District 8 3 Water bodies and how they are classified 11 4 The state of the water environment now 14 5 Actions to improve the water environment by 2015 19 6 The state of the water
    [Show full text]
  • The New River Improvement Project 7Th September 2017 Claudia Innes
    The New River Improvement Project 7th September 2017 Claudia Innes Community Projects Executive Corporate Responsibility Team ∗ Team of 18 - Education, community investment, volunteering and nature reserves ∗ Manage a £6.5 million community investment fund between 2014 and 2019 ∗ Aim to engage customers and communities through: ∗ environmental enhancement ∗ improving access and recreation ∗ educational outreach Governance • All funding applicants apply by form. • All spend is approved in advance by our Charities Committee • A Memorandum Of Understanding is generated to release the funds to the partner. 3 The New River – a brief history ∗ Aqueduct completed in 1613 by Goldsmith and Adventurer Hugh Myddelton and Mathematician Edward Wright. ∗ King James I agreed to provide half the costs on condition he received half of the profits ∗ Total cost of construction was £18,500. ∗ Essential part of London’s water supply. 48 million gallons a day are carried for treatment. The New River – a brief history ∗ Originally fed only by sources at Chadwell and Amwell Springs. ∗ The course of the New River now ends at Stoke Newington East Reservoir (Woodberry Wetlands). ∗ Water levels are regulated by sluices. Path development ∗ The New River Path was developed over 12 years at a cost of over £2 million ∗ 28 miles from Hertfordshire to North London. ∗ We have worked in partnership with, and with the support of, many organisations; including Groundwork, the New River Action Group, Friends of New River Walk, schools and communities, and all the local authorities
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation
    [Show full text]
  • A Celebration of the Islington Community of Schools Shortlist
    A celebration of the Islington Community of Schools Shortlist All those shortlisted Shortlisted nominees demonstrate ambition, innovation and excellence Bright Start Early Years Educator of the Year in their work. Aleta Ramsey, Nursery Teacher, Hugh Myddelton Primary School Rae Armes, 0-3 Coordinator, Prior Weston Primary School and Children’s Centre Ruby Uddin, Senior Early Years Educator, Archway Children’s Centre Covid Champion Andrew Turnock (and the entire school staff), Associate Head, Grafton Primary School Majella Brogan, Teresa Duignan, Tracey Daniel, Children’s Champions/Learning Support Assistants, Christ The King RC Primary Schools Abigail Miles, Year 1 Class Teacher and PE Lead, Thornhill Primary School Governing Board of the Year City of London Primary Academy Islington Highbury Community Nursery Samuel Rhodes School The Green Award Hargrave Park Primary School Montem Primary School Pooles Park Primary School Headteacher of the Year Jack Sloan, Headteacher, Hanover Primary School Francis Gonzalez, Headteacher, Richard Cloudesley School Deborah Shepherd, Headteacher, St Mary Magdalene Academy - The Courtyard Remote Learning Award David Shemoon, Assistant Head, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson School Paul Beeton, Assistant Head, Hanover Primary School Satya Maremanda, Assistant Head - Digital Strategy, Newington Green and Rotherfield Primary Schools Partnership Senior Leader of the Year Sue Brownson, Deputy Head and Lead for Deaf Provision, Laycock Primary School Sharon Kelly, Head of Centre, New River College - Medical Gabby London, Senior Lead, CurioCity Childcare Support Staff of the Year Winners will be Samuel Owusu, Teaching Assistant, Arts and Media School Islington announced at the Islington Ninfa Restrepo, Teaching Assistant, Year 3 and Specialist SEND Provision, Canonbury Education Awards Primary School ceremony on Gary Atkinson, Premises Manager, The Edventure Collaborative 29 June 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Feasibility of Annual Monitoring of Winter Gull Roosts in the UK and Possible Outputs from Such a Scheme
    BTO Research Report No. 483 An assessment of the feasibility of annual monitoring of winter gull roosts in the UK and possible outputs from such a scheme Authors N.H.K. Burton, I.M.D. Maclean & G.E. Austin Report of work carried out by The British Trust for Ornithology under contract to Natural England November 2007 British Trust for Ornithology British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU Registered Charity No. 216652 CONTENTS Page No. List of Tables...........................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures .........................................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................7 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................9 2. METHODS............................................................................................................................11 2.1 Identification of Sites Where Gull Numbers Surpass 1% Thresholds or Exceed 20,000 Birds ...........................................................................................................................11 2.2 Comparison of Species’ Indices Produced Using Wings and Webs Core Counts and Their Representativeness..............................................................................................12
    [Show full text]