DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(F) Evaluation August 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(F) Evaluation August 2019 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation August 2019 Prepared for the I-94 Modernization Project in Detroit from I-96 to Conner Avenue FHWA-MI-EIS-01-01-S1 I-94 Modernization Project in the City of Detroit Wayne County, Michigan DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION Submitted Pursuant to 42 USC 4332(2)(C) and CEQ Regulations (40CFR 1500 (et seq.)) by the: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and Michigan Department of Transportation Cooperating Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Date of Approval Russell Jorgenson Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration This document describes the social, economic and natural environmental impacts associated with the modernization of approximately 6.7 miles of Interstate freeway (I-94) in the city of Detroit, Michigan between I-96 and Conner Avenue (Project). Improvements include adding a travel lane in each direction, modernizing system and service interchanges, reconstructing bridges crossing over the freeway, and changing existing service drives to maximize efficiencies of the connected local travel patterns. This document includes a summary of the planning basis and of the impacts associated with the proposed Project and the process involved in determining the preferred alternative. Proposed mitigation measures are also included. After circulation of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS), and consideration of the comments received, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) may issue a Combined Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision (Combined FSEIS and ROD) document, unless statutory criteria or practicability considerations preclude issuance of the combined document. If comments received on the DSEIS are minor and responses to those comments are limited to factual corrections or explanations of why the comments do not warrant further response, the FHWA may instead issue a FSEIS Errata Sheet in compliance with Section 1319(a) of MAP-21, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (P.L. 112-141), Accelerated Decision Making in Environmental Reviews. Project purpose: The purpose of the Project is to improve safety, capacity, local connectivity, and condition of the I- 94 roadway, service drives, bridges, and interchanges between I-96 and Conner Avenue. The Project improvements will be context sensitive and support the mobility needs of local, regional and interstate commerce as well as national and civil defense in a way that integrates all modes of travel. Additional information: For additional information concerning the Project or this document please visit the Project website at I94Detroit.org or contact one of the following persons: Ruth Hepfer, Environment/Right-of-way Specialist Terry Stepanski, Project Manager Michigan Division, Federal Highway Administration Michigan Department of Transportation (B220) 315 W. Allegan, Room 201 P.O. Box 30050 Lansing, MI 48933 425 W. Ottawa Street [email protected] Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 702-1847 [email protected] (517) 241-0233 DSEIS │ AUGUST 2019 FHWA-MI-EIS-01-01-S1 Where to find a review copy: An electronic copy of this document is available on the Project website, I94Detroit.org. Hard copies are located at the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) office, the I-94 Project Office, and select libraries and community centers throughout the Project area. Please contact one of the people listed above for more information or check the Project website. Technical documents referred to in this DSEIS are available at the same locations. Public hearing: Information on the date, time, and location of the public hearing is published in local newspapers and on the Project website I94Detroit.org. How to comment: Anyone can comment on this document during the 45-day comment period. We encourage residents to comment because we need to understand resident’s concerns so that the Project can be designed to avoid or minimize impacts and if impacts cannot be avoided, that mitigation measures can be developed. Your comments on the DSEIS may be submitted in a variety of ways: You may submit written comments through the Project website at I94Detroit.org, mail your comments to Terry Stepanski at the address above, or email your comments to the Project email box: [email protected]. Also, at the scheduled public hearing, you may give verbal testimony, use comment forms that will be available, or give your verbal testimony to a court reporter at the hearing. DSEIS │ AUGUST 2019 I-94 Modernization Project │ Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Preface PREFACE The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires that the social, economic, and natural environmental impacts of any proposed action of the federal government be analyzed for decision-making and public information purposes. There are three classes of action. Class I Actions, which are those that may significantly affect the environment, require the preparation of an EIS. Class II Actions (categorical exclusions) are those that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the environment, and do not require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or an Environmental Assessment (EA). Class III Actions are those for which the significance of impacts is not clearly established. Class III Actions require the preparation of an EA to determine the significance of impacts and the appropriate environmental document to be prepared – either an EIS or a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). An EIS may be supplemented when FHWA determines that new information or circumstances relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed action or its impacts would result in significant environmental impacts not evaluated in the EIS. This DSEIS evaluates changes to the Approved Selected Alternative (ASA) identified in the 2004 FEIS and 2005 Record of Decision (ROD) for the Project. Because of adverse and de minimis effects on historic resources and public parks/recreation areas, this document also serves as coordination documentation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and as the draft Section 4(f) Evaluation, under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, which requires special consideration of these resources. DSEIS │ AUGUST 2019 I-94 Modernization Project │ Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Statement of Disclosure STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE HNTB Corporation has no interest, financial or otherwise, in the preparation of the I-94 Rehabilitation Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation and Revised ROD other than compensation for the services performed and the general enhancement of HNTB’s professional reputation. The team of professionals which HNTB assembled to conduct field studies and analyses was selected based solely upon their qualifications. To the best of HNTB’s knowledge, no person or firm contributing to the preparation of this document has any interest in the findings or outcome of the process. DSEIS │ AUGUST 2019 I-94 Modernization Project │ Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................................................................................... i Statement of Disclosure ................................................................................................................................. ii 1. Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1. Purpose of the Proposed Action ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2. Project Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3. Description of the Project Limits ..................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.1. Logical Termini and Independent Utility ....................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4. Need for Project .................................................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.4.1. Outdated Design .............................................................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.4.2. Infrastructure Condition .................................................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.4.3. Traffic .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1-5 1.4.4. Safety .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1-8 1.4.5. Multimodal Transportation ............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Detroit Neighborhoods
    St Clair Shores Oak Park Ferndale Hazel Park Warren Southfield Eastpointe 43 68 85 8 29 42 93 Harper Woods 83 34 7 90 78 16 44 19 54 97 4 95 105 76 77 56 94 86 60 72 33 26 6 45 81 67 84 69 88 58 Hamtramck 17 74 Redford Twp 12 103 39 30 40 1 89 41 71 15 9 20 100 66 80 96 70 82 5 51 36 57 2 38 49 27 59 99 23 35 32 73 62 61 50 46 3 37 53 104 52 28 102 13 31 79 98 21 64 55 11 87 18 22 25 65 63 101 47. Hubbard Farms 48 48. Hubbard Richard 77. Palmer Park 47 91 19. Conant Gardens 49. Indian Village 78. Palmer Woods Dearborn 20. Conner Creek 50. Islandview 79. Parkland 92 21. Core City 51. Jefferson Chalmers 80. Petosky-Otsego 22. Corktown 52. Jeffries 81. Pilgrim Village 23. Cultural Center 53. Joseph Berry Subdivision 82. Poletown East 24 Inkster 24. Delray 54. Krainz Woods 83. Pulaski 25. Downtown 55. Lafayette Park 84. Ravendale 75 14 26. East English Village 56. LaSalle College Park 85. Regent Park Melvindale 27. East Village 57. LaSalle Gardens 86. Riverdale 28. Eastern Market 58. Littlefield 87. Rivertown Dearborn Heights River Rouge 1. Arden Park 29. Eight Mile-Wyoming 59. Marina District 88. Rosedale Park 10 2. Art Center 30. Eliza Howell 60. Martin Park 89. Russell Woods 3. Aviation Sub 31. Elmwood Park 61. McDougall-Hunt 90. Sherwood Forest 4. Bagley 32. Fiskhorn 62.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Mccormick.Indd
    DIRECTIONS & ADDRESS TO: McCORMICK PLACE MARSHALLING AREA (3050 Moe Drive, Chicago, IL 60616) notes North of Chicago to McCormick Place: Interstate 90 (Kennedy Expressway) to Interstate 55 North. Take I-55 North until it ends. Bear right and EXIT at Lake Shore Drive South (41 south). Proceed approximately ½ mile and exit at 31st Street. Proceed up the exit ramp and bear right. Turn right at U-TURN BEFORE the stop light onto Moe Drive. If you went to the light you went too far. After making U- EXHIBITOR Turn go approximately ¼ of a mile to the fi rst stop sign. Turn left at the Stop sign and, YOU ARE THERE!!! West of Chicago to McCormick Place: Interstate 290 (Eisenhower Expressway) east to Interstate 94 (Dan Ryan Expressway). South on Interstate 94 (Dan Ryan Expressway) to Interstate 55 North. Take I-55 North until it ends. Bear right and EXIT at Lake Shore Drive South (41 south). Proceed approximately ½ mile and exit at 31st Street. Proceed up the exit ramp and bear right. Turn right at U-TURN BEFORE the stop light onto Moe Drive. If you went to the light you went too far. After making U-Turn go approximately ¼ of a mile to the fi rst stop sign. Turn left at the Stop sign and, YOU ARE THERE!!! Southwest of Chicago to McCormick Place: Interstate 55 North until it ends. Bear right and EXIT at Lake Shore Drive South (41 south). Proceed approximately ½ mile and exit at 31st Street. Proceed up the exit ramp and bear right. Turn right at U-TURN BEFORE the stop light onto Moe Drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit Metro Times Announces Merger with Real Detroit Weekly
    Media Contact: Cassandra Yardeni p 210.388.0606 c 210.475.2374 [email protected] MAY 6, 2014 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Detroit Metro Times Announces Merger With Real Detroit Weekly DETROIT — The Detroit Metro Times, Detroit’s award-winning alternative weekly media company, is pleased to announce a new venture. Real Detroit Weekly, a Detroit-based alternative weekly paper since 1999, is merging with Detroit Metro Times today, making it the largest alternative newsweekly in Michigan. The new company will maintain the Metro Times name. Owner and publisher of Real Detroit Weekly, John Badanjek, will serve as president of events of the newly formed media company alongside Chris Keating, publisher of the Metro Times. “Real Detroit Weekly has published the best in music and entertainment coverage for over 15 years,” says Badanjek. “We’re excited to join forces with the Metro Times to create a ‘superweekly’ that will offer metro Detroiters more music, art, political, dining and nightlife coverage than previously possible. “With an aggressive increase in circulation, the new paper will be capable of serving the needs of both Metro Times and Real Detroit Weekly readers. The new paper will feature the Metro Times’ award-winning journalism combined with Real Detroit's cutting-edge stories.” Of the merger, Keating says, “John and I are both excited to merge these brands into one. Undeniably, it's great to have a partnership where we maintain local ownership as well as continue to employ the hard-working people that really make these two papers great. Moving forward, the new company will take the –CONTINUED– best of both from Real Detroit Weekly and Metro Times — print, digital and events — and re-launch into a stronger and more balanced voice for the greater Detroit community.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? the Qline and the People Mover”
    “Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? The QLine and the People Mover” John B. Sutcliffe, Sarah Cipkar and Geoffrey Alchin Department of Political Science, University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4 Email: [email protected] Paper prepared for presentation at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC. June 2019. This is a working draft. Please do not cite without permission. 1 “Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? The QLine and the People Mover" Introduction On May 12, 2017 a new streetcar – the QLine – began operating in Detroit, running along a 3.3- mile (6.6-mile return) route on Woodward Avenue, one of the central north-south roads in the city. This project is one example of the return to prominence of streetcars in the (re)development of American cities. Having fallen into disuse and abandonment in hundreds of American cities during the early part of the 20th century, this form of public transit has returned in many cities including, for example, Dallas, Cincinnati, Kansas City, and Portland. As streetcar services have returned to prominence, so too has the debate about their utility as a form of public transit, the function they serve in a city, and who they serve (Brown 2013; Culver 2017). These debates are evident in the case of Detroit. Proponents of the QLine – most prominently the individuals and organizations that advocated for its creation and provided the majority of the start-up capital – have praised the streetcar for acting as a spur to development, for being a forward-thinking transit system and for acting as a first step towards a comprehensive regional transit system in Metro Detroit (see M-1 Rail 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx
    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Eloadas Modern Haboruk
    MUNKAHELYEK ÉPÍTÉSZETE 1. 4. előadás Modern „háborúk” – új igények: kényszerek és kísérletek Prof. Vasáros Zsolt DLA, építész, tanszékvezető egyetemi tanár BME Építészmérnöki Kar // Ipari és Mezőgazdasági Épülettervezési Tanszék Az előadások témakörei: 1. Bevezetés. Az (építő)anyag természete. Tapasztalat, tudás, kísérlet, kudarc és siker. 2. Anyag, szerkezet és forma. Összefüggések térben és időben. 3. Forradalmak és ipari forradalmak. Emberek és gépek. 4. Modern „háborúk” – új igények: kényszerek és kísérletek. 5. Az ember és a munka tere. Változó igények. 6. Tér és szerkezet: nagy, „okos”, gazdaságos. 7. Fény, levegő, hőmérséklet, szín, tér, anyag. A részletek fontossága. 8. Mindig változik? A technológia és a térbeli flexibilitás kérdései. 9. Jó munkahely - rossz munkahely: komfort, design, igény, presztízs. 10. A jelen és a jövő munkahelye. High-tech és low-tech építészet. 11. Lejárt az ideje! Menthető, bontandó, vagy újragondolható? Összefoglalás Prof. Vasáros Zsolt DLA építész, tanszékvezető egyetemi tanár /// BME Építészmérnöki Kar /// IPARTANSZÉK /// Munkahelyek építészete 1_5. előadás /// Az ember és a munka tere. Változó igények A 2017-2018-as tanévtől a Munkahelyek építészete 1. tantárgy előadássorozata megújult tematikával kerül bemutatásra. Az előadó az előadásokhoz különböző mértékben felhasználta Dobai János DLA egyetemi docens 2008-2017 között tartott előadásainak tartalmi elemeit és a képanyagát is, Dobai tanárurat köszönet illeti a tantárgy tematikájának fejlesztéséért. Az előadások képanyaga részben a korábbi előadásokból, illetve különböző forrásokból származik, ezek oktatási célú használatát, bemutatását a vonatkozó jogszabályok lehetővé teszik. Jelen előadás letöltése a vizsgára való felkészülést segíti, továbbadása, nyilvános, üzleti vagy oktatási célú bemutatása a Szerző(k) engedélye, beleegyezése nélkül tilos! Kapcsolódó tematikus áttekintés, szakirodalom: Lázár Antal: 1. Ipari munkahelyek. 1.1 Történeti visszatekintés.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Improvement of Interstate 80/94
    Proposed Improvement of Interstate 80/94 Interstate 294 to U.S. Route 41 (Calumet Avenue) Cook County, Illinois Lake County, Indiana T.H.E. Conference – University of Illinois February 24, 2004 Regional Map Project Dates • July 1995 – Project Initiated • May 1999 – Funding Announced through Illinois FIRST • September 2001 – Begin Phase II Design • November 2001 – Public Hearing • June 2003 – Design Approval • August 2003 – First of Over 25 Contract Awards Project Location Traffic Volumes Current: 130,000 - 159,000 Vehicles per Day Projected 2020: 164,000 - 192,000 Vehicles per Day 27 % Multi-Unit Trucks Needs Identified • Improve Highway Safety • Improve Mobility • Improve the Configuration and Condition of the Roadway Project Overview EB I-80 to NB I-94 I-80/I-94 Junction WB I-80/94 Split WB I-80 Under Capacity Torrence Ave Interchange BERNICE ROAD 176th PLACE Proposed Features • Proposed Improvement Plan – Complete Reconstruction – Four Continuous Through Traffic Lanes in Each Direction – Auxiliary Lanes for Entrance and Exit Maneuvers – Drainage System – Elimination of 2 Pump Stations – Noise Abatement Walls – Roadway Lighting Origin-Destination Study – 354267 % of westboundeastboundtraffic is through traffictraffic traffic exitingfrom Torrencecontinuing at Torrence Avenue east- Avenuecontinueswest along comes west Interstate onfrom Interstate Interstate 80 80 94 I-80/I-94/IL 394 Interchange Flyover to I-94 4 Through Lanes To Torrence Ave Flyover to IL 394 I-80/94 Reconfiguration I-80 I-94 / IL 394 4 Through Lanes I-94 IL 394 To Torrence
    [Show full text]
  • Mi0747data.Pdf
    DETROIT'S MILWAUKEE JUNCTION SURVEY HAER MI-416 Milwaukee Junction HAER MI-416 Detroit Michigan WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD DETROIT’S MILWAUKEE JUNCTION SURVEY HAER MI-416 Location: Milwaukee Junction, Detroit, Michigan The survey boundaries are Woodward Avenue on the west and St. Aubin on the east. The southern boundary is marked by the Grand Trunk Western railroad line, which runs just south of East Baltimore from Woodward past St. Aubin. The northern boundary of the survey starts on the west end at East Grand Boulevard, runs east along the boulevard to Russell, moves north along Russell to Euclid, and extends east along Euclid to St. Aubin. Significance: The area known as Milwaukee Junction, located just north of Detroit’s city center, was a center of commercial and industrial activity for more than a century. Milwaukee Junction served, if not as the birthplace of American automobile manufacturing, then as its nursery. In addition to the Ford Motor Company and General Motors, many early auto manufacturers and their support services (especially body manufacturers like the Fisher Brothers, C.R. Wilson, and Trippensee Auto Body) were also located in the area, probably because of the proximity of the railroads. Historians: Kenneth Shepherd and Richard Sucré, 2003 Project Information: The Historic American Engineering Record conducted a survey of Detroit’s Milwaukee Junction, a center of auto and related industrial production, in summer 2003. The City of Detroit and the city’s Historic Designation Advisory Board sponsored the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • OCC Chancellor, Faculty at Odds Seeing the Forest for the Trees
    20140217-NEWS--0001-NAT-CCI-CD_-- 2/14/2014 7:50 PM Page 1 ® www.crainsdetroit.com Vol. 30, No. 7 FEBRUARY 17 – 23, 2014 $2 a copy; $59 a year ©Entire contents copyright 2014 by Crain Communications Inc. All rights reserved Health Care Heroes OCC chancellor, faculty at odds JOHN SOBCZAK mance targets, accept OCC transfer students, New demands of job market and seemingly while coping with new budget real- picayune busi- ities amid reduced enrollment, ness, like how property values and per-pupil Honorees helped solve a erupt in clash over over control many faculty po- state aid. sitions the col- Meyer said he was a “little sur- mystery disease – and BY CHAD HALCOM college academics to reflect the de- lege keeps in ce- prised” by the faculty’s action, more, Page 11 CRAIN’S DETROIT BUSINESS mands of the job market. ramics. which cited “lack of leadership and Long before a no-confidence vote Meyer, OCC’s absence of vision for student suc- A power struggle between the Friday on Chancellor Timothy chancellor since cess.” Page 3 chancellor and instructors at Oak- Meyer, the administration and lead- Meyer 2008, said the “Most of the constituents of the land Community College flared up in ers of the Oakland Community College college is mak- college are reasonably satisfied Change is good? Opinions a public way Friday, but it actually Faculty Association have clashed on ing administrative changes to with the direction we’re taking,” has been in a slow burn for some broad strategic matters, like how adapt to the latest needs of local vary on minimum-wage hike time over staffing and control of OCC defines its mission and perfor- employers and universities that See OCC, Page 17 Obamacare mandate on hold: Flexibility – and confusion Ctrl-Alt-weekly: A new direction for Metro Times Seeing the forest for the trees This Just In Midtown Development Group files for Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Euclid Media Group Acquires St. Louis Weekly, Riverfront Times Cleveland-Based Company Purchases Multimedia Property from Voice Media Group
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tuesday, March 24, 2015 Euclid Media Group Acquires St. Louis Weekly, Riverfront Times Cleveland-based company purchases multimedia property from Voice Media Group St. Louis, MO — Euclid Media Group, a media company headquartered in Cleveland, OH, announced today that it has purchased the Riverfront Times, an award-winning St. Louis alternative weekly publication, formerly owned by Voice Media Group. The Riverfront Times has been recognized among the top 20 alt-weeklies in the country, though the industry has faced challenges in recent years. Euclid Media Group anticipates a revitalization of the alt-weekly by ushering in fresh print, digital and event marketing strategies, as well as through the addition of notable staff, like newly appointed Editor in Chief, Sarah Fenske. Sarah Fenske is an award-winning journalist and veteran of the Riverfront Times, having served as its Managing Editor from 2010 to 2011 before leaving to become Editor in Chief of the L.A. Weekly. Under her direction, the Weekly became the nation's most-read alternative newsweekly, growing its web traffic 63 percent and earning numerous national and local awards. Most recently, Fenske has worked as Director of Digital Content at Feast Magazine, a regional food and drink focused publication. “I'm thrilled to be returning to the Riverfront Times," Fenske said of the hire. "The staff has been doing amazing work under difficult circumstances, and I'm excited to be a part of Euclid Media Group's plans for the paper. I can't wait to join Managing Editor Jessica Lussenhop and the rest of the team." The acquisition marks the sixth property for Euclid Media Group, whose multimedia portfolio includes the Cleveland Scene, Detroit Metro Times, Orlando Weekly, San Antonio Current and OutInSA.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Paper
    Parliamentary Library & Information Service Department of Parliamentary Services Parliament of Victoria Parliamentary Library & Information Service Department of Parliamentary Services Parliament of Victoria Research Paper Detroit: What Lessons for Victoria from a ‘Post-Industrial’ City? No. 2, December 2015 Tom Barnes Research Fellow, Parliamentary Library & Information Service Institute for Religion, Politics and Society Australian Catholic University Level 6, 215 Spring St, Melbourne VIC 3000 [email protected] ISSN 2204-4752 (Print) 2204-4760 (Online) © 2015 Parliamentary Library & Information Service, Parliament of Victoria Research Papers produced by the Parliamentary Library & Information Service, Department of Parliamentary Services, Parliament of Victoria are released under a Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence. By using this Creative Commons licence, you are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work under the following conditions: . Attribution - You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non-Commercial - You may not use this work for commercial purposes without our permission. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work without our permission. The Creative Commons licence only applies to publications produced by the Library, Department of Parliamentary Services, Parliament of Victoria. All other material produced by the Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • I-294/I-57 Interchange Cook County, Illinois
    I-294/I-57 INTERCHANGE COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM Proposed 147th Street Improvements - Kedzie Avenue to Western Avenue/Dixie Highway I-57/I-294 Interchange - Minor Updates Based on New Environmental Studies FEBRUARY 2009 I-294/I-57 EA Addendum TABLE OF CONTENTS Background and History............................................................................................. 1 Environmental Assessment Addendum..................................................................... 3 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED......................................................................................... 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 3 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................. 5 2.3 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED IN DETAIL........................................................ 5 2.3.2 Preferred Alternative..................................................................... 5 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 3.1 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS .......................................................... 5 3.1.1 Social and Economic Affected Environment............................... 6 3.1.1.12 Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Facilities........................... 6 3.1.2 Social and Economic Environmental Consequences.................... 6 3.2 FARMLAND ...................................................................................................7 3.3 AIR QUALITY...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]