DOCSLIB.ORG

Amendment 1 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Tautog

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amendment 1 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Tautog Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Amendment 1 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Tautog October 2017 Sustainably Managing Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Amendment 1 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Tautog Prepared by: Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Tautog Plan Development Team Plan Development Team Members: Ashton Harp and Toni Kerns (respective Chairs), Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Linda Barry, New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife Sandra Dumais, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Sabrina Lovell, NOAA Fisheries Jason McNamee, Rhode Island Division of Fish and Wildlife Craig Weedon, Maryland Department of Natural Resources This is a report of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA15NMF4740069. Acknowledgements Amendment 1 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Tautog was developed under the supervision of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s Tautog Management Board, chaired by Adam Nowalsky (May 2015-present). Members of the Tautog Advisory Panel, chaired by Gary Libby, and the Tautog Plan Development Team, chaired by Ashton Harp (ASMFC), contributed to the development of this amendment. Considerable support was provided by the Tautog Technical Committee, chaired by Jason McNamee (RI DFW) and Linda Barry (NJ F&W). We are also grateful for the efforts of three regional Workgroups that developed the proposed management measures that went out for public comment. In particular, thanks is extended to the MARI Workgroup of Dan McKiernan (MA DMF), and Mark Gibson and Jason McNamee (RI DFW); the LIS and NJ-NYB Workgroup of Dave Simpson (CT DEEP), Steve Heins and Sandra Dumais (NYS DEC), and Russ Allen and Larry Barry (NJ F&W); and the DelMarVa Workgroup of John Clark (DE DNREC), Mike Luisi and Craig Weedon (MD DNR), and Joe Cimino (VMRC). Additional contributions came from ASMFC staff Dr. Katie Drew, Toni Kerns, Caitlin Starks, Jessica Kuesel, and Tina Berger. Appreciation is also extended to the many fishermen, representatives of conservation groups and members of the public who have written letters and attended public hearings to express their opinions and contribute ideas. Amendment 1 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Tautog ii Executive Summary Amendment 1 consolidates the 1996 Fishery Management Plan (FMP) and associated addenda, as well as and new management measures into a single document. It is now the comprehensive document for tautog management in state waters. Statement of the Problem Since the Tautog FMP was implemented in 1996, the resource has experienced changes in stock status, as well as management measures used to control harvest. Based on the 2015 Benchmark Stock Assessment and Peer Review Report, tautog is overfished and overfishing is occurring on a coastwide scale. The 2016 Regional Stock Assessment proposed a four-region stock delineation approach to reduce the risk of overfishing and account for tautog’s very limited coastwide movement. Additionally, an illegal, unreported, and undocumented fishery has persisted for more than a decade for tautog. To address these issues an amendment to the FMP was initiated to implement measures to regionally manage and better protect the stock. See Section 1.1 for additional information. Description of the Resource, Life History and Habitat Requirements Tautog are distributed along the Northeast Atlantic coast of North America from the outer coast of Nova Scotia to Georgia, although they are most abundant from Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras. They inhabit coastal and estuarine waters throughout this range. Tautog are attracted to some type of structure in all post larval stages of their life cycle, staying close to a preferred home site and moving only short distances longitudinally, if at all, during seasonal migrations. Adult tautog generally migrate inshore in the spring from offshore wintering locations to spawn between April and July in estuaries or nearshore marine waters. Spawning occurs in heterosexual pairs or in groups of a single female with several males, although pair spawning is more common. Tautog typically migrate offshore when water temperatures drop below approximately 50°F in the late fall, although seasonal migration is not uniformly exhibited. Some adults remain inshore and active throughout the year, particularly in the southern portion of the range. The species’ distribution, behavior and, perhaps, growth and survival, are related to its high dependence on blue mussels; a significant decline in the availability of blue mussels can cause tautog to abandon a particular area. See Section 1.3 for additional information. Fishery Description The tautog fishery is predominantly recreational, with anglers accounting for about 90% of landings coastwide. The recreational fishery occurs throughout the year and primarily uses hook and line gear. Coastwide recreational harvest peaked in 1986 at over 7 million fish and has since declined. Average recreational harvest from 2013-2015 was 708,136 fish, with 2014 nearly double the harvest of 2013 and 2015. Amendment 1 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Tautog iii Coastwide commercial landings showed a similar pattern to recreational harvest, although the magnitude is smaller, representing approximately 9% of the total harvest over the entire time series. Commercial landings peaked in the late 1980s at 1.2 million lbs (525 mt), and declined to an average of 273,373 lbs (124 mt) in 2013-2015. See Section 1.3 for additional information. The distribution of harvest along the coast has fluctuated somewhat in recent years; harvest from Delaware through Virginia has declined while it has increased in the Long Island Sound region. From 2013-2015, the Massachusetts- Rhode Island region accounted for 27% of coastwide removals, Long Island Sound accounted for 35%, New Jersey-New York Bight accounted for 32%, and Delaware-Maryland-Virginia accounted for 5%. Goals and Objectives The goal of Amendment 1 is to sustainably manage tautog over the long-term using regional differences in biology and fishery characteristics as the basis for management. Additionally, the Amendment seeks to promote the conservation and enhancement of structured habitat to meet the needs of all stages of tautog’s life cycle. The Amendment objectives are designed to support the goals of this amendment. See Section 2.3 for additional information. Specification of the Management Unit The management unit is defined as all U.S. territorial waters of the northwest Atlantic Ocean, from the shoreline to the seaward boundary of the exclusive economic zone, and from the US/Canadian border to the southern end of the species’ range. Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, NOAA Fisheries, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service have declared an interest in tautog. Definition of Overfishing Overfishing is defined relative to the rate of removals from the population as determined by the fishing mortality on the stock. The level of spawning stock biomass in a stock as the result of fishing mortality is the basis for determining if a stock has become overfished. A biomass target or threshold determines the condition of the stock, whereas the mortality rate determines how fast the population is moving toward achieving the appropriate level of biomass. Biological reference points for tautog are region-specific. See Section 2.5 for additional information. Catch and Landings Information The majority of recreational tautog landings are captured through the Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP). Recreational effort data is collected through phone surveys, but will transition to mail surveys in 2018. Recreational catch data is collected through an access- site intercept survey. All commercial harvesters are required to report a minimum set of standard data elements to NMFS for all trips regardless of catch. All permittees in the limited-access commercial fishery in Amendment 1 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Tautog iv New Jersey are required to submit monthly reports identifying tautog landings by day, gear, and location, as well as any bycatch. See Section 3.2.1 for additional information. Recreational Fisheries Management Measures Amendment 1 delineates the stock into four regions due to differences in biology and fishery characteristics, and limited coastwide movement. Recreational management measures are determined individually by the four management regions in response to the 2016 Stock Assessment Update. Some regions approved consistent measures for all states within the region, while other regions approved state-specific measures achieving the same goal for all states within the region. Regional working groups will develop options for management measures within a region. If a state within a region wants to implement different management measures than those within the region, the general procedure within Section 4.11, Conservation Equivalency will be followed. All modifications to management measures reviewed by the Technical Committee and approved by the Management Board. See Section 4.2 for additional information. Commercial Fisheries Management Measures Commercial management measures were also approved by the Board for each region, following the same process as recreational measures. A state or region may implement an annual commercial quota following the procedures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Translation Series No.1375
    FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Translation Series No. 1375 Bioebenoses and biomass of benthos of the Newfoundland-Labrador region. By Ki1N. Nesis Original title: Biotsenozy i biomassa bentosa N'yufaund- • .lendskogo-Labradorskogo raiona.. From: Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo •Instituta Morskogo Rybnogo Khozyaistva Okeanografii (eNIRO), 57: 453-489, 1965. Translated by the Translation Bureau(AM) Foreign Languages Division Department of the Secretary of State of Canada Fisheries Research Board of Canada • Biological Station , st. John's, Nfld 1970 75 pages typescript 'r OEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECRÉTARIAT D'ÉTAT TRANSLATION BUREAU BUREAU DES TRADUCTIONS FOREIGN LANGUAGES DIVISION DES LANGUES DIVISION ° CANADA ÉTRANGÈRES TRANSLATED FROM - TR,ADUCTION DE INTO - EN Russian English 'AUTHOR - AUTEUR Nesis K.N. TITLE IN ENGLISH - TITRE ; ANGLAIS Biocoenoses and biomas of benthos of the Newfolindland-Labradoriregion Title . in foreign_iangnage---(tranalitarate_foreisn -ottantatere) Biotsenozy i biomassa bentosa N i yufaundlendSkogo-Labradorskogoraiona. , .ReF5RENCE IN FOREIGN ANGUA2E (NAME OF BOOK OR PUBLICATION) IN FULL. TRANSLITERATE FOREIGN CFiA,IRACTERS. • REFERENCE' EN LANGUE ETRANGERE (NOM DU LIVRE OU PUBLICATION), AU COMPLET. TRANSCRIRE EN CARACTERES PHONETIQUEL •. Trudylesesoyuznogo nauchno-iàsledovaterskogo instituta morskogo — rybnogo khozyaistva i okeanogràfii - :REFEREN CE IN ENGLISH - RÉFÉRENCE EN ANGLAIS • Trudy of the 40.1-Union Scientific-Research Instituteof Marine . Fiseriés and Oceanography. PUBLISH ER ÉDITEUR PAGE,NUMBERS IN ORIGINAL DATE OF PUBLICATION NUMEROS DES PAGES DANS DATE DE PUBLICATION . L'ORIGINAL YE.tR ISSUE.NO . 36 VOLUME ANNEE NUMERO PLACE OF PUBLICATION NUMBER OF TYPED PAGES LIEU DE PUBLICATION NOMBRE DE PAG.ES DACTY LOGRAPHIEES 1965 5 7 REQUEr IN G• DEPA RTMENT Fisheries Research Board TRANSLATION BUREAU NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011
    SGR 129 Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY AND APPLIED NUTRITION OFFICE OF FOOD SAFETY Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – April 2011 Additional copies may be purchased from: Florida Sea Grant IFAS - Extension Bookstore University of Florida P.O. Box 110011 Gainesville, FL 32611-0011 (800) 226-1764 Or www.ifasbooks.com Or you may download a copy from: http://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances You may submit electronic or written comments regarding this guidance at any time. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations. gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (240) 402-2300 April 2011 Table of Contents: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance • Guidance for the Industry: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance ................................ 1 • CHAPTER 1: General Information .......................................................................................................19 • CHAPTER 2: Conducting a Hazard Analysis and Developing a HACCP Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Fronts in the World Ocean's Large Marine Ecosystems. ICES CM 2007
    - 1 - This paper can be freely cited without prior reference to the authors International Council ICES CM 2007/D:21 for the Exploration Theme Session D: Comparative Marine Ecosystem of the Sea (ICES) Structure and Function: Descriptors and Characteristics Fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems Igor M. Belkin and Peter C. Cornillon Abstract. Oceanic fronts shape marine ecosystems; therefore front mapping and characterization is one of the most important aspects of physical oceanography. Here we report on the first effort to map and describe all major fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs). Apart from a geographical review, these fronts are classified according to their origin and physical mechanisms that maintain them. This first-ever zero-order pattern of the LME fronts is based on a unique global frontal data base assembled at the University of Rhode Island. Thermal fronts were automatically derived from 12 years (1985-1996) of twice-daily satellite 9-km resolution global AVHRR SST fields with the Cayula-Cornillon front detection algorithm. These frontal maps serve as guidance in using hydrographic data to explore subsurface thermohaline fronts, whose surface thermal signatures have been mapped from space. Our most recent study of chlorophyll fronts in the Northwest Atlantic from high-resolution 1-km data (Belkin and O’Reilly, 2007) revealed a close spatial association between chlorophyll fronts and SST fronts, suggesting causative links between these two types of fronts. Keywords: Fronts; Large Marine Ecosystems; World Ocean; sea surface temperature. Igor M. Belkin: Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, 215 South Ferry Road, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA [tel.: +1 401 874 6533, fax: +1 874 6728, email: [email protected]].
    [Show full text]
  • Barndoor Skate, Dipturus Laevis, Life History and Habitat Characteristics
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-173 Essential Fish Habitat Source Document: Barndoor Skate, Dipturus laevis, Life History and Habitat Characteristics U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Region Northeast Fisheries Science Center Woods Hole, Massachusetts March 2003 Recent Issues in This Series: 155. Food of Northwest Atlantic Fishes and Two Common Species of Squid. By Ray E. Bowman, Charles E. Stillwell, William L. Michaels, and Marvin D. Grosslein. January 2000. xiv + 138 p., 1 fig., 7 tables, 2 app. NTIS Access. No. PB2000-106735. 156. Proceedings of the Summer Flounder Aging Workshop, 1-2 February 1999, Woods Hole, Massachusetts. By George R. Bolz, James Patrick Monaghan, Jr., Kathy L. Lang, Randall W. Gregory, and Jay M. Burnett. May 2000. v + 15 p., 5 figs., 5 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB2000-107403. 157. Contaminant Levels in Muscle of Four Species of Recreational Fish from the New York Bight Apex. By Ashok D. Deshpande, Andrew F.J. Draxler, Vincent S. Zdanowicz, Mary E. Schrock, Anthony J. Paulson, Thomas W. Finneran, Beth L. Sharack, Kathy Corbo, Linda Arlen, Elizabeth A. Leimburg, Bruce W. Dockum, Robert A. Pikanowski, Brian May, and Lisa B. Rosman. June 2000. xxii + 99 p., 6 figs., 80 tables, 3 app., glossary. NTIS Access. No. PB2001-107346. 158. A Framework for Monitoring and Assessing Socioeconomics and Governance of Large Marine Ecosystems. By Jon G. Sutinen, editor, with contributors (listed alphabetically) Patricia Clay, Christopher L. Dyer, Steven F. Edwards, John Gates, Tom A. Grigalunas, Timothy Hennessey, Lawrence Juda, Andrew W. Kitts, Philip N.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Technical Report NMFS SSRF-668
    NOAA TR NMFS SSRF-668 A UNITED STATES NMFS SSRF-668 DEPARTMENT OF NOAA Technical Report COMMERCE PUBLICATION r Oiological Unoralory Marine | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE J ^^P^^tSX National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Jilt "3 1973 National Marine Fisheries Service L An Annotated Bibliography of the Gunner, TBUtogo/abrus adspersus (Walbaum) FREDRIC M. SERCHUK and DAVID W. FRAME SEATTLE, WA May 1973 NOAA TECHNICAL REPORTS National Marine Fisheries Service, Special Scientific Report-Fisheries Series The major responsibilities of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) are to monitor and assess the abundance and geographic distribution of fishery resources, to understand and predict fluctuations in the quantity and distribution of these resources, and to establish levels for optimum use of the resources. NMFS is also charged with the development and implementation of policies for managing national fishing grounds, develop- ment and enforcement of domestic fisheries regulations, surveillance of foreign fishing off' United States coastal waters, and the development and enforcement of international fishery agreements and policies. NMFS also as- sists the fishing industry through marketing service and economic analysis programs, and mortgage insurance and vessel construction subsidies. It collects, analyzes, and publishes statistics on various phases of the industry. The Special Scientific Report—Fisheries series was established in 1949. The series carries reports on scien- scientific tific investigations that document long-term continuing programs of NMFS, or intensive reports on studies of restricted scope. The reports may deal with applied fishery problems. The series is also used as a medium for the publication of bibliographies of a specialized scientific nature.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Sea Scallop Abundance and Distribution in the Georges Bank Closed Area II - Preliminary Results
    An Assessment of Sea Scallop Abundance and Distribution in the Georges Bank Closed Area II - Preliminary Results Submitted to: Sea Scallop Plan Development Team Falmouth, Massachusetts William D. DuPaul David B. Rudders Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William and Mary Gloucester Point, VA 23062 VIMS Marine Resource Report No. 2007-3 June 27, 2007 Draft document-for Scallop PDT use only Do not circulate, copy or cite Project Summary As the spatial and temporal dynamics of marine ecosystems have recently become better understood, the concept of entirely closing or limiting activities in certain areas has gained support as a method to conserve and enhance marine resources. In the last decade, the sea scallop resource has benefited from measures that have closed specific areas to fishing effort. As a result of closures on both Georges Bank and in the mid-Atlantic region, biomass of scallops in those areas has expanded. As the time approaches for the fishery to harvest scallops from the closed areas, quality, timely and detailed stock assessment information is required for managers to make informed decisions about the re-opening. During May of 2007, an experimental cruise was conducted aboard the F/V Celtic, a commercial sea scallop vessel. At pre-determined sampling stations within the exemption area of Georges Bank Closed Area II (GBCAII) both a standard NMFS survey dredge and a commercial New Bedford style dredge were simultaneously towed. From the cruise, fine scale survey data was used to assess scallop abundance and distribution in the closed areas. The results of this study will provide additional information in support of upcoming openings of closed areas within the context of continuing sea scallop industry access to the groundfish closed areas on Georges Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission
    Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Migratory Group Cobia ASMFC Vision: Sustainably Managing Atlantic Coastal Fisheries November 2017 Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Migratory Group Cobia Prepared by Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Cobia Plan Development Team Plan Development Team Members: Louis Daniel, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, Chair Mike Schmidtke, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Ryan Jiorle, Virginia Marine Resources Commission Steve Poland, North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries Mike Denson, South Carolina Kathy Knowlton, Georgia Krista Shipley, Florida Deb Lambert, NMFS Kari MacLauchlin, SAFMC This Plan was prepared under the guidance of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s South Atlantic State/Federal Fisheries Management Board, Chaired by Jim Estes of Florida and Advisory assistance was provided by the South Atlantic Species Advisory Panel Chaired by Tom Powers of Virginia. This is a report of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA15NMF4740069. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (Commission) has developed an Interstate Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Cobia, under the authority of the Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Management Act (ACFCMA). Management authority for this species is from zero to three nautical miles offshore, including internal state waters, and lies with the Commission. Regulations are promulgated by the Atlantic coastal states. Responsibility for compatible management action in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) from 3-200 miles from shore lies with the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under their Coastal Migratory Pelagics Fishery Management Plan (CMP FMP) under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2011 Robert T
    The Community Outlook VOL. LXII, No. 9 August 2011 Robert T. Dowling Robert T. © Published by Point Lookout Community Church, Point Lookout, Long Island, N.Y. Page 2 The Community Outlook August 2011 “A Service to the Community” than those who were more isolated. These people were less susceptible to mucous than The relationally isolated subjects. (I’m not mak- ing this up. They produced less mucous. Community This means it is literally true: Unfriendly Outlook people are snottier than friendly people.) Issued throughout the year by the God has wired us to be social beings. Point Lookout Community Church Pastor’s Outlook Whenever we live in line with the way he has P.O. Box 28 designed us to be we benefit in every way both Point Lookout, Long Island, New York One of the most fascinating statements that physically and emotionally. When we gather Jesus made is found in the Gospel of Mat- together “in His name” we then add the Brendan H. Cahill, Editor thew 18:20 where it says, “For where two spiritual component. The writer of the book Maureen Dowling O’Sullivan, or three are gathered together in my name, of Hebrews encourages the early believers Assistant Editor there am I in the midst.” I think to gather with some of the most important things they are to do when he writes this: “Let us hold Marion Lemke, Advertisements in his name is not as simple as just saying a prayer when we come together and pro- unswervingly to the hope we profess, for He Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing the Georges Bank Scallop Fishery by Maximizing Meat Yield and Minimizing Bycatch
    Optimizing the Georges Bank Scallop Fishery /; by Maximizing Meat Yield and Minimizing Bycatch Final Report Prepared for the 2017 Sea Scallop Research Set-Aside (NA17NMF4540030) October 2018 Coonamessett Farm Foundation, Inc 277 Hatchville Road East Falmouth, MA Submitted By 02536 508-356-3601 FAX 508-356-3603 Luisa Garcia, Liese Siemann, Ron Smolowitz - Coonamessett Farm [email protected] Foundation, Inc David Rudders www.cfarm.org Roxanna Smolowitz- Roger Williams University TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 8 OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................. 10 GENERAL SAMPLING METHODS ....................................................................................... 10 Study area .....................................................................................................................................10 Sampling design ...........................................................................................................................11 Laboratory analysis ......................................................................................................................14 Data analysis .................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Tautoga Onitis Common Name: Tautog (Black Fish)
    Species Status Assessment Class: Actinopterygii Family: Labridae Scientific Name: Tautoga onitis Common Name: Tautog (Black fish) Species synopsis: Tautog, also referred to as black fish, range along the mid-Atlantic Bight from Nova Scotia to South Carolina (Bigelow and Schroeder 1953). In New York, this species can be found in the Hudson River estuary, New York Bight and Long Island Sound. Tautog prefer areas with good shelter for protection, and are found around rock reefs, rocky outcrops, shellfish beds, gravel, eelgrass beds, and kelp or sea lettuce (Ulva lactuca) beds (Steimle and Shaheen 1999). Since the mid-1980s, tautog populations have been exposed to intensive recreational and commercial fishing (ASMFC 2011). In 1996, the Atlantic States Marine Fishery Commission drafted an interstate fishery management plan for tautog to reduce fishing mortality rates and increase recruitment (ASMFC 1996). I. Status a. Current and Legal Protected Status i. Federal ____ Not Listed______________________ Candidate? __No_____ ii. New York ____Not Listed; SGCN__________________________________________ b. Natural Heritage Program Rank i. Global _____GNR_________________________________________________________ ii. New York _____SNRN_______________ Tracked by NYNHP? ____No_____ Other Rank: United States National Status: Not assessed IUCN Red List: Vulnerable 1 Status Discussion: Tautog populations have been subject to intensive fishing over the last two decades. Approximately ninety percent of the recorded landings have come from recreational fishing although the commercial harvest of tautog for the live market is heavily under-reported. There has been a decline of 60% in recorded landings (ASMFC 2006). An intensive stock assessment confirmed that fishing mortality was above recommended levels (ASMFC 2006). II. Abundance and Distribution Trends a.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abaco Knoll, 359 116, 304, 310, 323 Bahama Platform, 11, 329, 331, 332, Abathomphalus mayaroensis, 101 Aquia Formation, 97, 98, 124 341, 358, 360 Abbott pluton, 220 aquifers, 463, 464, 466, 468, 471, Bahama volcanic crust, 356 Abenaki Formation, 72, 74, 257, 476, 584 Bahamas basin, 3, 5, 35, 37, 39, 40, 259, 261, 369, 372, 458 Aquitaine, France, 213, 374 50 ablation, 149 Arcadia Formation, 505 Bahamas Fracture Zone, 24, 39, 40, Abyssal Plain, 445 Archaean age, 57 50, 110, 202, 349, 358, 368 Adirondack Mountains, 568 Arctic-North Atlantic rift system, 49, Bahamas Slope, 12 Afar region, Djibouti, 220, 357 50 Bahamas-Cuban Fault system, 50 Africa, 146, 229, 269, 295, 299 Ardsley, New York, 568, 577 Baja California, Mexico, 146 African continental crust, 45, 331, Argana basin, Morocco, 206 Bajocian assemblages, 20, 32 347 Argo Fan, Scotian margin, 279 Balair fault zone, 560 African Craton, 368 Argo Salt Formation, 72, 197, 200, Baltimore Canyon trough, 3, 37, 38, African margin, 45, 374 278, 366, 369, 373 40, 50, 67, 72 , 81, 101, 102, African plate, 19, 39, 44, 49 arkoses, 3 138, 139, 222, 254, 269, 360, Afro-European plate, 197 artesian aquifers, 463 366, 369, 396, 419,437 Agamenticus pluton, 220 Ashley Formation, 126 basement rocks, 74 age, 19, 208, 223 Astrerosoma, 96 carbonate deposits, 79 Agulhas Bank, 146 Atkinson Formation, 116, 117 crustal structure, 4, 5, 46 Aiken Formation, 125 Atlantic basin, 6, 9, 264 faults in, 32 Aikin, South Carolina, 515 marine physiography, 9 geologic
    [Show full text]
  • Threats from Fishing and Cumulative Impacts
    6.2 Adverse impacts of fishing activities under South Atlantic Council Fishery Management Plans (excerpted from Barnette 2001) All fishing has an effect on the marine environment, and therefore the associated habitat. Fishing has been identified as the most widespread human exploitative activity in the marine environment (Jennings and Kaiser 1998), as well as the major anthropogenic threat to demersal fisheries habitat on the continental shelf (Cappo et al. 1998). Fishing impacts range from the extraction of a species which skews community composition and diversity to reduction of habitat complexity through direct physical impacts of fishing gear. The nature and magnitude of the effects of fishing activities depend heavily upon the physical and biological characteristics of a specific area in question. There are strict limitations on the degree to which probable local effects can be inferred from the studies of fishing practices conducted elsewhere (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries 1999). The extreme variability that occurs within marine habitats confounds the ability to easily evaluate habitat impacts on a regional basis. Obviously, observed impacts at coastal or nearshore sites should not be extrapolated to offshore fishing areas because of the major differences in water depth, sediment type, energy levels, and biological communities (Prena et al. 1999 ). Marine communities that have adapted to highly dynamic environmental conditions (e.g., estuaries) may not be affected as greatly as those communities that are adapted to stable environmental conditions (e.g., deep water communities). While recognizing the pitfalls that are associated with applying the results of gear impact studies from other geographical areas, due to the lack of sufficient and specific information within the Southeast Region it is necessary to review and carefully interpret all available literature in hopes of improving regional knowledge and understanding of fishery-related habitat impacts.
    [Show full text]