Intra-Yemeni Talks Needed for United Yemen
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Single Family Residence Design Guidelines
ADOPTED BY SANTA BARBARA CITY COUNCIL IN 2007 Available at the Community Development Department, 630 Garden Street, Santa Barbara, California, (805) 564-5470 or www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov 2007 CITY COUNCIL, 2007 ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW, 2007 Marty Blum, Mayor Iya Falcone Mark Wienke Randall Mudge Brian Barnwell Grant House Chris Manson-Hing Dawn Sherry Das Williams Roger Horton Jim Blakeley Clay Aurell Helene Schneider Gary Mosel SINGLE FAMILY DESIGN BOARD, 2010 UPDATE PLANNING COMMISSION, 2007 Paul R. Zink Berni Bernstein Charmaine Jacobs Bruce Bartlett Glen Deisler Erin Carroll George C. Myers Addison Thompson William Mahan Denise Woolery John C. Jostes Harwood A. White, Jr. Gary Mosel Stella Larson PROJECT STAFF STEERING COMMITTEE Paul Casey, Community Development Director Allied Neighborhood Association: Bettie Weiss, City Planner Dianne Channing, Chair & Joe Guzzardi Jaime Limón, Design Review Supervising Planner City Council: Helene Schneider & Brian Barnwell Heather Baker, Project Planner Planning Commission: Charmaine Jacobs & Bill Mahan Jason Smart, Planning Technician Architectural Board of Review: Richard Six & Bruce Bartlett Tony Boughman, Planning Technician (2009 Update) Historic Landmarks Commission: Vadim Hsu GRAPHIC DESIGN, PHOTOS & ILLUSTRATIONS HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION, 2007 Alison Grube & Erin Dixon, Graphic Design William R. La Voie Susette Naylor Paul Poirier & Michael David Architects, Illustrations Louise Boucher H. Alexander Pujo Bill Mahan, Illustrations Steve Hausz Robert Adams Linda Jaquez & Kodiak Greenwood, -
Annual Development Programme
ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 16 - PROGRAMME 2015 PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUNE, 2015 www.khyberpakhtunkhwa.gov.pk FINAL ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 2015-16 GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT http://www.khyberpakhtunkhwa.gov.pk Annual Development Programme 2015-16 Table of Contents S.No. Sector/Sub Sector Page No. 1 Abstract-I i 2 Abstract-II ii 3 Abstract-III iii 4 Abstract-IV iv-vi 5 Abstract-V vii 6 Abstract-VI viii 7 Abstract-VII ix 8 Abstract-VIII x-xii 9 Agriculture 1-21 10 Auqaf, Hajj 22-25 11 Board of Revenue 26-27 12 Building 28-34 13 Districts ADP 35-35 14 DWSS 36-50 15 E&SE 51-60 16 Energy & Power 61-67 17 Environment 68-69 18 Excise, Taxation & NC 70-71 19 Finance 72-74 20 Food 75-76 21 Forestry 77-86 22 Health 87-106 23 Higher Education 107-118 24 Home 119-128 25 Housing 129-130 26 Industries 131-141 27 Information 142-143 28 Labour 144-145 29 Law & Justice 146-151 30 Local Government 152-159 31 Mines & Minerals 160-162 32 Multi Sectoral Dev. 163-171 33 Population Welfare 172-173 34 Relief and Rehab. 174-177 35 Roads 178-232 36 Social Welfare 233-238 37 Special Initiatives 239-240 38 Sports, Tourism 241-252 39 ST&IT 253-258 40 Transport 259-260 41 Water 261-289 Abstract-I Annual Development Programme 2015-16 Programme-wise summary (Million Rs.) S.# Programme # of Projects Cost Allocation %age 1 ADP 1553 589965 142000 81.2 Counterpart* 54 19097 1953 1.4 Ongoing 873 398162 74361 52.4 New 623 142431 35412 24.9 Devolved ADP 3 30274 30274 21.3 2 Foreign Aid* * 148170 32884 18.8 Grand total 1553 738135 174884 100.0 Sector-wise Throwforward (Million Rs.) S.# Sector Local Cost Exp. -
CAPSTONE 20-1 SWA Field Study Trip Book Part II
CAPSTONE 20-1 SWA Field Study Trip Book Part II Subject Page Afghanistan ................................................................ CIA Summary ......................................................... 2 CIA World Fact Book .............................................. 3 BBC Country Profile ............................................... 24 Culture Gram .......................................................... 30 Kazakhstan ................................................................ CIA Summary ......................................................... 39 CIA World Fact Book .............................................. 40 BBC Country Profile ............................................... 58 Culture Gram .......................................................... 62 Uzbekistan ................................................................. CIA Summary ......................................................... 67 CIA World Fact Book .............................................. 68 BBC Country Profile ............................................... 86 Culture Gram .......................................................... 89 Tajikistan .................................................................... CIA World Fact Book .............................................. 99 BBC Country Profile ............................................... 117 Culture Gram .......................................................... 121 AFGHANISTAN GOVERNMENT ECONOMY Chief of State Economic Overview President of the Islamic Republic of recovering -
Office Market Assessment Montgomery County, Maryland
Office Market Assessment Montgomery County, Maryland Prepared for the Montgomery County Planning Department June 18, 2015 Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................... iv Regional Office Vacancies (Second Quarter, 2015) ............................................................... iv Findings .................................................................................................................................... v Recommendations .................................................................................................................... v Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Montgomery County’s Challenge ............................................................................................ 1 I. Forces Changing the Office Market ....................................................................................... 3 Types of Office Tenants ........................................................................................................... 3 Regional and County Employment ......................................................................................... 4 Regional Employment Trends ............................................................................................. 4 Montgomery County Employment Trends .......................................................................... 6 Regional -
Multi-Family Residential Design Guidelines[PDF]
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted by the Marin County Board of Supervisors on December 10, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY STAFF Susan Adams, District 1 Brian C. Crawford Katie Rice, District 2 Director of Community Development Agency Kathrin Sears, District 3 Thomas Lai Steve Kinsey, District 4 Assistant Director of Community Development Agency Judy Arnold, District 5 Jeremy Tejirian Planning Manager of Planning Division PLANNING COMMISSION Stacey Laumann Katherine Crecelius, At-Large Planner of Planning Division Ericka Erickson, At-Large Don Dickenson, District 1 Margot Biehle, District 2 John Eller, District 3 Michael Dyett, Principal-In-Charge Wade Holland, District 4 Matt Taecker, Principal Peter Theran, District 5 Jeannie Eisberg, Senior Associate WORKING GROUP Supported by a grant from the Metropolitan Transportation Bob Hayes Commission Smart Growth Technical Assistance Program Bruce Burman John Eller Steven Aiello Curry Eckelhoff Rich Gumbiner Allan Bortel Marge Macris Kathleen Harris Robert Pendoley Scott Gerber Steven Lucas Sim Van der Ryn Cover image adapted from: The American Transect, http://www.transect.org/rural_img.htm i CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................................1-1 Purpose ...............................................................................................................................................................1-1 Fundamental Design -
THE DANISH SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE List of Content
THE DANISH SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE List of content The romantic villa approx. 1860 - 1920 Historicism approx. 1850 - 1930 National romantic 1850 - 1920 Master mason house, approx. 1913 - 1930 Functionalismn The functional villa State loan house The modernist villa, 1950 – 1968 The standard house, approx. 1960 The energy-efficient house 1973 - 1985 The post-modern villa Style history THE DANISH SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE The model for single-family house as we know it today, which is Danish the most preferred way of living, has been developed over the last approximately 100 years The romantic bourgeois villa, approx. 1860 - 1920 At the end of the 1800s it was the wealthy part of the population, who built large residential houses, "bourgeois houses," on large grounds on the edge of or outside the polluted cities. Friboes Hvile 1756-58. Houses plan was most often convoluted to yield Plan and elevation. nooks and niches with space to create, storeroom, etc., but also with large living - and sleeping quarters, as well as toilets and bathrooms. The houses were usually equipped with several bay windows and balconies. The roof structure was pitched roof or mansard roof with dormers and large chimney pots. The houses were clean craftsmanship in the top, but using the best materials that could be provided, Perspective of Friboes Hvile. floors oregion pine etc. Akvarel by Ole Sand Olesen There was also not spared inventory as skirting boards, wall panels, and gerikter, and ceilings were provided with beautiful stucco work. The stairs from the hall was often done with brick steps and railing work with meticulous detail. -
Effect of Window Overhang Shade on Heat Gain of Various Single Glazing Window Glasses for Passive Cooling
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Technology 23 ( 2016 ) 439 – 446 3rd International Conference on Innovations in Automation and Mechatronics Engineering, ICIAME 2016 Effect of Window Overhang shade on Heat gain of Various Single Glazing Window glasses for Passive Cooling Saboor Shaika*, KiranKumar Gorantlab, Ashok Babu Talanki Puttaranga Settyc a,b,c Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karntaka, Surathkal, Mangalore-575025, Karnataka, India. Abstract This paper presents thermal performance of various single glazing window glasses covered with and without window overhang shading. Buildings are designed with laterite stone walls with different dimensions of overhang shading devices on single glazing windows in four different climatic zones of India: Ahmedabad (Hot & dry), Bangalore (moderate), Calcutta (warm & humid) and Hyderabad (composite). In this study, five glass materials such as clear, bronze, green, grey and blue-green were selected. Total three hundred and twenty building models with and without window overhangs were designed in four climatic zones of India using Design builder 4.3.0.039. Thermal simulation was carried out in Energy plus 8.1 simulation tool. From the results, it is observed that laterite buildings with grey glass window with 1.5m overhang shading device were found to be energy efficient from the least heat gain point of view in south direction among three hundred and twenty building models studied in four climatic zones of India. The results of the study help in selecting the best window glass material and also help in selecting appropriate dimensions for overhang shading device for reducing cooling loads in buildings. © 20162016 The The Authors. -
MINUTES of the REGULAR MEETING Thursday, July 18, 2019 TOWNSHIP of MANALAPAN – Courtroom Manalapan, NJ 07726
July 18, 2019 Page 1 of 4 MANALAPAN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING Thursday, July 18, 2019 TOWNSHIP OF MANALAPAN – Courtroom Manalapan, NJ 07726 Chairman Stephen Leviton called the meeting to order with the reading of the Open Public Meetings at 7:30 PM followed by the salute to the flag. Roll Call: Janice Moench In attendance at the meeting: Mollie Kamen, Terry Rosenthal, Larry Cooper, Adam Weiss, Stephen Leviton, Mary Anne Byan, David Schertz, Robert Gregowicz. Absent from the meeting: Eliot Lilien, Eric Nelson Also, present John Miller, Esq., Zoning Board Attorney Nancy DeFalco, Zoning Officer Janice Moench, Recording Secretary MINUTES : A Motion was made by Mr. Weiss, Seconded by Mr. Schertz, to approve the Minutes of June 20, 2019 as written. Yes: Rosenthal, Cooper, Weiss, Leviton, Byan, Schertz, Gregowicz No: None Abstain: None Absent: Lilien, Nelson Not Eligible: Kamen, Lilien RESOLUTIONS: A Motion was made by Mr. Weiss, Seconded by Mr. Cooper to approve the Resolution of memorialization of approval for Application ZBE1907/ZBE1908 Rehold Inc. & Peoplemover LLC. Yes: Rosenthal, Cooper, Weiss, Leviton, Byan, Schertz, Gregowicz No: None Abstain: None Absent: Nelson, Lilien Not Eligible: Kamen A Motion was made by Mr. Weiss, Seconded by Ms. Byan to approve the Resolution of memorialization of approval for Application ZBE1918 Vasiliki Arvantis. Yes: Rosenthal, Cooper, Weiss, Leviton, Byan, Schertz No: None Abstain: None Absent: Nelson Not Eligible: Kamen, Lilien, Gregowicz July 18, 2019 Page 2 of 4 A Motion was made by Mr. Weiss, Seconded by Mr. Schertz to approve the Resolution of memorialization of approval for Application ZBE1923 Eric Habrack. -
Roof Overhang and Building Coverage
M E M O R A N D U M To: Development Services staff From: Matthew Seubert for Tina Axelrad, Zoning Administrator Date: May 24, 2018 (Revised: 5/14/2020) Re: Denver Zoning Code Clarification — Roof Overhang and Building Coverage Summary This memo provides a written clarification that addresses the following related questions: • At what point is an eave or roof overhang so large that it is considered the roof of a partially enclosed structure? • When does a roof overhang count towards building coverage? In general, and as explained below, a Roof Overhang or Eave that is 3’ or less does not count towards building coverage. A Roof Overhang of 3’ or less may be permitted to encroach into required Setbacks, depending on the zone district and the allowed setback encroachments. A Roof Overhang in excess of 3’ is considered a roof of a Partially Enclosed Structure and counts towards allowed building coverage of the Zone Lot. Discussion – Code Analysis Relevant DZC sections include Sections 4.3.7.4.B.1 and similar provisions in the DZC, Articles 3-9, which specify requirements for setback encroachments. For example, Gutters and Roof Overhangs are permitted to encroach up to 3’ into the Primary and Side Street Setback area in all E Zone Districts, because they are considered minor architectural elements that do not negate the intent of setbacks remaining open to the sky. The Rule of Measurement (ROM) (DZC 13.1.5.13) for Building Coverage, Gross Area of Footprint, states: For purposes of building coverage, ‘gross area of footprint’ shall include: 1. -
Hadhrat's Advices
ےہزعم نیسح ا دمح ےس اپب اگنہہم ريگو د ا ر اہيں ل ب ا لط ےک ےيلولتا ر اہيں شا وخں یک چ ک نب اجیت ےہ Anthem of Darul Uloom Deoband Shaikhul Islam, Hadhrat Moulana Sayyid Husain Ahmad Madani (rahmatullahi alayh) خ ي خ خ خ ش اﻻالسم رضحت ومﻻنا دیس يسح ادمح دم ين اص بح رحمة اہلل علييہ The life and Mission of Shaikhul Islam, Hadhrat Moulana Sayyid Husain Ahmad Madani (rahmatullahi alayh) No Copyright (ɔ) Permission is granted for reprinting this book without any alterations. A humble appeal is made to the readers to offer suggestions, corrections, etc. to improve the quality of future publications. May Allah Ta‟ala reward you for this. The translators, editors, compilers and typesetters humbly request your duas for them, their parents, families, asaatizah and mashaaikh. Title: The Life and Mission of Hadhrat Moulana Husain Ahmad Madani (rahmatullahi alayh) Compiled and Published by: Jamiatul Ulama (KZN) Ta‟limi Board 4 Third Avenue P.O.Box 26024 Isipingo Beach 4115 South Africa Tel: (+27) 31 912 2172 Fax: (+27) 31 902 9268 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.talimiboardkzn.org ISBN: 978-0-6399008-3-4 First Edition: Muharram 1439 / October 2017 Contents Map of India .......................................................................................... I A Glimpse into the life of Shaikhul Islam ..................... I Introduction .............................................................III Foreword ................................................................ VII Chapter 1 ................................................................... -
(BISP) Targeting Process Evaluation
Benazir Income Support Programme Targeting Process Evaluation (Cluster A & B) Final Report July 2013 Submitted by: ICF GHK In association with sub-consultants: Collective for Social Science Research Associates in Development (AiD) Private Limited P40252714 and P40252715 Benazir Income Support Programme Targeting Process Evaluation (Cluster A & B) Final Report July 2013 Submitted by: ICF GHK In association with sub-consultants: Collective for Social Science Research Associates in Development (AiD) Private Limited P40252714 and P40252715 Khatib Alam Consulting Director ICF GHK Clerkenwell House, 67 Clerkenwell Road, London, EC1R 5BL, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7611 1100 Fax: +44 (0)20 3368 6960 Internet: http://www.ghkint.com Ref: J40252714-15/BISP A&B/July/2013 25th July, 2013 Director Beneficiaries Services Benazir Income Support Programme F Block Pak Secretariat, Islamabad, Pakistan. Dear Mr. Naveed Akbar Subject: Final Report – BISP Targeting Process Evaluation (Cluster A&B) We are pleased to submit our final deliverable for the Targeting Process Evaluation (TPE), Cluster A and B, the Final Report. The content and structure of this report was presented at the Project Completion Workshop, held in Bhurban on 7th May, 2013. The valuable comments and suggestions of the BISP senior management and participants at the workshop have been incorporated into the report. The detailed structure was subsequently agreed with yourself during the meeting of 16th July, 2013. As agreed, the analysis synthesizes and covers our key findings for both Clusters A and B, across four phases of fieldwork. It also covers all four components of the TPE: i) The Targeting Process; (ii) Data Entry; (iii) Grievance Complaints; (iv) Payments Complaints. -
Single Family Home Design Techniques
City of Sunnyvale SINGLE FAMILY HOME DESIGN TECHNIQUES Adopted January 2003 City of Sunnyvale TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 APPLICABILITY ..........................................SFD 1 1.2 PURPOSE ..............................................SFD 1 1.3 ORGANIZATION .........................................SFD 1 1.4 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ...............................SFD 2 2. COMMUNITY EXPECTATIONS 2.1 NEIGHBORHOOD PATTERNS .....................................SFD 3 2.2 BASIC DESIGN PRINCIPLES .......................................SFD 7 2.3 REVIEW CRITERIA ...............................................SFD 8 3. DESIGN TECHNIQUES 3.1 NEIGHBORHOOD PATTERNS ...............................SFD 9 3.2 PARKING ...............................................SFD 10 3.3 ENTRIES ................................................SFD 12 3.4 SECOND FLOORS ........................................SFD 13 3.5 ROOFS ................................................SFD 17 3.6 PRIVACY AND SOLAR ACCESS ..............................SFD 18 3.7 MATERIALS .............................................SFD 20 3.8 WINDOWS AND DOORS ..................................SFD 21 3.9 DECORATIVE ELEMENTS ...................................SFD 23 3.10 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ................................SFD 25 3.11 LANDSCAPING .........................................SFD 25 4. EXAMPLES 4.1 COMMON PROBLEMS ....................................SFD 27 4.2 SUCCESSFUL INFILL EXAMPLES .............................SFD 29 5. GLOSSARY ...............................................SFD