Tapping the Tidal Power Potential of the Eastern Irish Sea FINAL REPORT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tapping the Tidal Power Potential of the Eastern Irish Sea FINAL REPORT Joule Project JIRP106/03 Oct 2006 – Dec 2008 Tapping the Tidal Power Potential of the Eastern Irish Sea FINAL REPORT March 2009 Richard Burrows, Ian Walkington, Nick Yates, Terry Hedges, Daoyi Chen, Ming Li, Jianguo Zhou Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GQ Judith Wolf, Roger Proctor, Jason Holt Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, Liverpool L3 5DA David Prandle Consultant www.liv.ac.uk/engdept/tidalpower CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (and Definition) xiii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 1.1 Terms of reference 1.1 1.2 Background 1.1 1.3 Project aims and objectives 1.3 2. PRELIMINARY STUDIES 2.1 2.1 Initial appraisals of barrage potential based on Prandle’s approach 2.1 2.2 Reassessment of the 1980s Department of Energy barrage scheme 2.2 energy estimates 2.2.1 Conjuctive operation 2.3 3. ENERGY FROM MAJOR BARRAGE SCHEMES (0-D MODELLING) 3.1 3.1 0-D modelling context 3.1 3.2 Dee Estuary and Dee-Wirral Lagoon 3.2 3.2.1 Initial appraisal (ebb generation only) 3.3 3.2.2 Investigating different operating modes 3.5 3.2.2.1 Effect of pumping 3.6 3.2.3 Turbine conditioning 3.7 3.2.3.1 Changing generator capacity 3.7 3.2.3.2 Increasing turbine diameter 3.8 3.2.3.3 Conclusion 3.8 3.2.4 Increasing installed turbine capacity and cost implications arising 3.10 3.2.4.1 Comment and discussion 3.12 3.2.5 Increasing installed sluice capacity and cost implications arising 3.13 3.2.6 Dee Outer Barrage (Dee-Wirral Lagoon) 3.14 3.2.7 Dee Offshore Lagoon 3.15 3.3 Mersey Estuary 3.16 3.3.1 Initial appraisal (ebb generation only) 3.17 3.3.2 Investigating different operating modes 3.17 3.3.2.1 Effect of pumping 3.18 3.3.3 Turbine conditioning 3.19 3.3.3.1 Changing generator capacity 3.19 3.3.4 Increasing installed turbine capacity and cost implications arising 3.21 3.3.4.1 Effect on generation window 3.22 3.3.5 Increasing installed sluice capacity and cost implications arising 3.23 3.3.6 Intertidal area 3.24 3.4 Ribble Estuary 3.28 3.5 Morecambe Bay 3.29 3.5.1 Initial appraisal (ebb generation only) 3.31 3.5.2 Investigating different operating modes 3.31 3.5.2.1 Effect of pumping 3.32 3.5.3 Turbine conditioning 3.33 3.5.3.1 Changing generator capacity 3.33 i 3.5.4 Increasing installed turbine capacity and cost implications arising 3.35 3.5.5 Increasing installed sluice capacity and cost implications arising 3.36 3.6 Solway Firth 3.36 3.6.1 Initial appraisal (ebb generation only) 3.38 3.6.2 Investigating different operating modes 3.38 3.6.2.1 Effect of pumping 3.39 3.6.3 Turbine conditioning 3.40 3.6.3.1 Changing generator capacity 3.40 3.6.4 Increasing installed turbine capacity and cost implications arising 3.42 3.6.5 Increasing installed sluice capacity and cost implications arising 3.43 3.6.6 Conclusion 3.44 4. CONJUNCTIVE (MULTI-SCHEME) ENERGY CAPTURE (2-D 4.1 MODELLING) 4.1 Introduction 4.1 4.2 Present climate scenario 4.3 4.2.1 Base configuration (1xDoEn) 4.3 4.2.1.1 One-way (ebb) mode operation 4.3 4.2.1.2 Two-way (dual) mode operation 4.5 4.2.2 Tidal stream turbine farm energy capture 4.7 4.2.3 Enhanced energy capture from tripling turbine capacity (3xDoEn) 4.9 4.2.3.1 One-way (ebb) mode operation 4.9 4.2.3.2 Two-way (dual) mode operation 4.11 4.2.4 Combined tidal range (1xDoEn barrages, ebb mode) and tidal stream 4.13 extraction 4.2.4.1 Tidal range 4.13 4.2.4.2 Tidal stream 4.14 4.2.5 Summary 4.15 4.3 Future climate scenario 4.16 4.3.1 Tidal range 4.17 4.3.1.1 One-way (ebb) mode operation (1xDoEn) 4.17 4.3.1.2 Two-way (dual) mode operation (3xDoEn) 4.18 4.3.2 Tidal stream 4.20 4.3.3 Combined tidal range (3xDoEn barrages, dual mode) and tidal stream 4.21 extraction 4.3.3.1 Tidal range 4.21 4.3.3.2 Tidal stream 4.21 4.3.4 Summary 4.22 5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS 5.1 5.1 Introduction 5.1 5.1.1 Generic impacts of tidal power schemes 5.2 5.1.1.1 Physical changes 5.2 5.1.1.2 Environmental and ecological impacts 5.2 5.1.1.3 Human, economic, aesthetic and amenity impacts 5.3 5.1.2 Modelling studies: far-field effects 5.3 5.2 Present hydrodynamics in the Irish Sea (base run) 5.4 5.3 Impact of changes in tide-induced circulation 5.6 5.3.1 One-way (ebb) mode operation (1xDoEn) 5.6 5.3.2 Two-way (dual) mode operation (3xDoEn) 5.8 5.3.3 Environmental implications 5.10 5.4 Impacts on the estuarial waters and intertidal regime 5.11 5.4.1 Introduction 5.11 5.4.2 Case study for the Mersey Estuary 5.13 ii 5.4.2.1 2-D modelling 5.14 5.4.2.2 Environmental implications 5.16 5.5 Impact on sediment regime and induced morphological changes 5.17 5.6 Water quality issues from reduced exchange and sediment 5.22 disturbance 5.6.1 Surface water quality 5.22 5.6.2 Contaminated sediments 5.23 5.7 Flood defence 5.25 5.7.1 Flood risk in the estuaries and protection offered by barrages 5.25 5.7.2 Global warming and coastal vulnerability 5.28 5.7.3 Conclusion 5.28 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 6.1 Conclusions 6.1 6.2 Recommendations 6.2 7. REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 7.1 APPENDICES 1. A.1 A.1.1 The research team A.1.2 House of Commons evidence A.1.3 Tidal stream energy extraction from estuaries 2. A.2 A.2.1 Theoretical background to energy computations (0-D modelling) A.2.2 Implication of entry and exit losses in turbine conduits A.2.3 Validation of Turgency/Generation Matlab computational routines A.2.4 Preliminary studies – potential from barrages on major UK estuaries A.2.5 Constructional aspects 3. A.3 A.3.1 Barrage lines, cross sections and bathymetries A.3.2 Energy computation spreadsheets A.3.3 Costing calculations 4. A.4 A.4.1 ADCIRC background A.4.2 Barrage operation in ADCIRC A.4.3 Tidal stream farms in ADCIRC A.4.4 Validation of simulation grid iii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1: Different modes of operation of a tidal barrage. ES.2 Figure 2: The 0-D modelling interface: example for Dee scheme. ES.3 Figure 3: ADCIRC tidal modelling domain showing bathymetry and ES.3 unstructured grid (North West barrages shown inset). Figure 4: Illustration of power pulses and basin levels for schemes on the ES.5 Dee. Figure 5: Intertidal area retained in the Mersey. ES.6 Figure 6: 1xDoEn schemes in ebb-mode operation (spring output shown ES.7 inset). Figure 7: 1xDoEn schemes in dual-mode operation (spring output shown ES.8 inset). Figure 1.3.1: Schematic illustration of potential barrages initially envisaged. 1.3 Figure 2.2.1.1: Power output of all barrages with maximum generation window 2.4 (preliminary studies). Figure 2.2.1.2: Power output of all barrages during spring tides with maximum 2.4 generation window (preliminary studies). Figure 2.2.1.3: Power output of all barrages during neap tides with maximum 2.5 generation window (preliminary studies). Figure 2.2.1.4: Power output of all barrages for maximum energy generation 2.5 (preliminary studies). Figure 2.2.1.5: Power output of all barrages during spring tides for maximum 2.6 energy generation (preliminary studies). Figure 2.2.1.6: Power output of all barrages during neap tides for maximum 2.6 energy generation (preliminary studies). Figure 3.1.1: Screen image showing: top – turbine performance characteristics; 3.1 middle – tidal (green) and basin (blue) level variations; and bottom – power outputs. Figure 3.2.1: Sketch showing the location of a Dee Barrage. 3.2 Figure 3.2.2: Dee basin area (km2) as a function of water level (mAOD). 3.3 Figure 3.2.1.1: Illustration of the ebb generating cycle. 3.4 Figure 3.2.1.2: Effect of delays on annual ebb energy output from Dee Barrage 3.4 (initial appraisal). Figure 3.2.2.1: Dee Barrage water levels for different operating modes (samples 3.6 from the spring tidal phase; external tide level in green, basin water level in blue). Figure 3.2.3.3.1: Dee Barrage water levels and power output for 6m diameter 3.9 turbines; ebb mode. Figure 3.2.3.3.2: Dee Barrage water levels and power output for 8m diameter 3.9 turbines; ebb mode. Figure 3.2.4.1: Dee Barrage dual mode operation with 80 8m x 10MW turbines. 3.10 Figure 3.2.4.2: Annual energy output from Dee Barrage operating in ebb and dual 3.11 modes as a function of number of turbines.
Recommended publications
  • A Scoping Study On: Research Into Changes in Sediment Dynamics Linked to Marine Renewable Energy Installations
    A Scoping Study on: Research into Changes in Sediment Dynamics Linked to Marine Renewable Energy Installations Laurent Amoudry3, Paul S. Bell3, Kevin S. Black2, Robert W. Gatliff1 Rachel Helsby2, Alejandro J. Souza3, Peter D. Thorne3, Judith Wolf3 April 2009 1British Geological Survey Murchison House West Mains Road Edinburgh EH9 3LA [email protected] www.bgs.ac.uk 2Partrac Ltd 141 St James Rd Glasgow G4 0LT [email protected] www.partrac.com 3Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory Joseph Proudman Building 6 Brownlow Street Liverpool L3 5DA, www.pol.ac.uk 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study scopes research into the impacts and benefits of large-scale coastal and offshore marine renewable energy projects in order to allow NERC to develop detailed plans for research activities in the 2009 Theme Action Plans. Specifically this study focuses on understanding changes in sediment dynamics due to renewable energy structures. Three overarching science ideas have emerged where NERC could provide a significant contribution to the knowledge base. Research into these key areas has the potential to help the UK with planning, regulation and monitoring of marine renewable installations in a sustainable way for both stakeholders and the environment. A wide ranging consultation with stakeholders was carried out encompassing regulators, developers, researchers and other marine users with a relevance to marine renewable energy and/or sediment dynamics. Based on this consultation a review of the present state of knowledge has been produced, and a relevant selection of recent and current research projects underway within the UK identified to which future NERC funded research could add value. A great deal of research has already been done by other organisations in relation to the wind sector although significant gaps remain, particularly in long term and far-field effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power
    No.59 z iii "Ill ~ 2 er0 Ill Ill 0 Nuclear Family Pia nning p3 Chernobyl Broadsheet ·, _ I. _ . ~~~~ George Pritchar d speaks CONTENTS COMMENT The important nuclear development since the Nuclear Family Planning 3 last SCRAM Journal was the Government's The CEGB's plans, and the growing opposition, after Sizewell B by go ahead for Sizewell B: the world's first HUGH RICHARDS. reactor order since Chernobyl, and Britain's News 4-6 first since the go ahead was given to Torness Accidents Will Happen 1 and Heysham 2 in 1978. Of great concern is Hinkley Seismic Shocker 8-9 the CEGB's announced intention to build "a A major article on seismic safety of nuclear plants in which JAMES small fanilty• of PWRs, starting with Hinkley GARRETT reveals that Hinkley Point C. At the time of the campaign In the Point sits on a geological fault. south west to close the Hinkley A Magnox Trouble at Trawsfynydd 10-11 station, and .a concerted push in Scotland to A summary of FoE's recent report on increasing radiation levels from prevent the opening of Torness, another Trawsfynydd's by PATRICK GREEN. nuclear announcement is designed to divide Pandora's POX 12 and demoralise the opposition. But, it should The debate over plutonium transport make us more determined. The article on the to and from Dounreay continues by facing page gives us hope: the local PETE MUTTON. authorities on Severnside are joining forces CHERNOBYL BROADSHEET to oppose Hinkley C, and hopefully they will Cock-ups and Cover-ups work closely with local authorities in other "Sacrificed to • • • Nuclear Power" threatened areas - Lothian Region, The Soviet Experience Northumberland, the County Council Coalition "An Agonising Decision• 13 against waste dumping and the Nuclear Free GEORGE PRITCHARD explains why Zones - to formulate a national anti-nuclear he left Greenpeoce and took a job strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy River: Realising Energy Potential from the River Mersey
    The Energy River: Realising Energy Potential from the River Mersey June 2017 Amani Becker, Andy Plater Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZT Judith Wolf National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool L3 5DA This page has been intentionally left blank ii Acknowledgements The work herein has been funded jointly by the University of Liverpool’s Knowledge Exchange and Impact Voucher Scheme and Liverpool City Council. The contribution of those involved in the project through Liverpool City Council, Christine Darbyshire, and Liverpool City Region LEP, James Johnson and Mark Knowles, is gratefully acknowledged. The contribution of Michela de Dominicis of the National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool, for her work producing a tidal array scenario for the Mersey Estuary is also acknowledged. Thanks also to the following individuals approached during the timeframe of the project: John Eldridge (Cammell Laird), Jack Hardisty (University of Hull), Neil Johnson (Liverpool City Council) and Sue Kidd (University of Liverpool). iii This page has been intentionally left blank iv Executive summary This report has been commissioned by Liverpool City Council (LCC) and joint-funded through the University of Liverpool’s Knowledge Exchange and Impact Voucher Scheme to explore the potential to obtain renewable energy from the River Mersey using established and emerging technologies. The report presents an assessment of current academic literature and the latest industry reports to identify suitable technologies for generation of renewable energy from the Mersey Estuary, its surrounding docks and Liverpool Bay. It also contains a review of energy storage technologies that enable cost-effective use of renewable energy. The review is supplemented with case studies where technologies have been implemented elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Flood Greenhouse Effect Plutonium Flights of Fancy Ministry
    ., Th~ Safe Energy ,J - Journal - July I August 19 88 75p Before the Flood Greenhouse Effect Plutonium Fl ights of Fancy Ministry of Truth - Chernobyl Lies CONTENTS COMMENT Flights of Fancy? 3 In the words of Or Tom Wheldon, at the Fourth STEVE MARTIN reviews the regulatory Annual Low Level Radiation and Health Conference log-jam in the US over planned held in Stirling, to say that radiation has existed in plutonium flights from Europe to Japan. the environment since the dawn of humankind and News 4-7 is therefore not a problem is just as daft as saying Ministry of Truth 8-9 that crocodiles have been around since the begin­ PATRICK GREEN accuses MAFF of ning with no perceived adverse effects - they will trying to rewrite history in their evidence to the Agriculture Com­ still bite your leg off, given half a chance. mittee. The Irresistible Force 10-11 The second report on the incidence of childhood meets the Immovable Object leukaemia near Dounreay from COMARE, of which ANDREW HOLMES asks what will Or Wheldon is a member, is a valuable contribution happen to nuclear research after privatisation. to the debate; but don't forget what happened to Snug as a Bug ••• 12 the 1976 Flowers Report. For the uninitiated, DON ARNOTT assesses the evidence Flowers recommended, among other things, that no that bacteria have been found in the large scale nuclear power ordering programme be burned-out core of the Three Mile Is­ land reactor. embarked on until the nuclear waste problem had Milk of Human Kindness? 14-15 been solved.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Range Energy Resource and Optimization – Past
    1 Tidal range energy resource and optimization { past 2 perspectives and future challenges a,∗ b a 3 Simon P. Neill , Athanasios Angeloudis , Peter E. Robins , Ian c a d a 4 Walkington , Sophie L. Ward , Ian Masters , Matt J. Lewis , Marco a b b f 5 Piano , Alexandros Avdis , Matthew D. Piggott , George Aggidis , Paul g h f e 6 Evans , Thomas A. A. Adcock , Audrius Zidonisˇ , Reza Ahmadian , Roger e 7 Falconer a 8 School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Marine Centre Wales, Menai Bridge, UK b 9 Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, UK c 10 School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Department of Geography, Liverpool John 11 Moores University, Liverpool, UK d 12 College of Engineering, Swansea University, Bay Campus, Swansea, UK e 13 School of Engineering, Cardiff University, The Parade, Cardiff, UK f 14 Engineering Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK g 15 Wallingford HydroSolutions, Castle Court, 6 Cathedral Road, Cardiff, UK h 16 Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 17 Abstract 18 Tidal energy is one of the most predictable forms of renewable energy. Al- 19 though there has been much commercial and R&D progress in tidal stream 20 energy, tidal range is a more mature technology, with tidal range power plants 21 having a history that extends back over 50 years. With the 2017 publication 22 of the \Hendry Review" that examined the feasibility of tidal lagoon power 23 plants in the UK, it is timely to review tidal range power plants. Here, we 24 explain the main principles of tidal range power plants, and review two main 25 research areas: the present and future tidal range resource, and the opti- 26 mization of tidal range power plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Document for Chorley and South Ribble CCG Governing Body
    Chorley and South Ribble CCG Governing Body - Part 1 25 September 2019 at 2.30 pm Victoria Room, Farrington Lodge Hotel, Stanifield Lane, Farington, Lancashire, Preston PR25 4QR Item Agenda Item Objectives/ Presented By Time No Desired Outcomes 1 Welcome and Apologies for Dr G Bangi 2.30 pm Absence Verbal 2 Declarations and Register of To provide Dr G Bangi 2.32 pm Interests (Pages 5 - 14) assurance Assurance 3 Minutes of Previous Meeting For group approval Dr G Bangi 2.35 pm (Pages 15 - 34) Approval 4 Matters Arising (Pages 35 - To update the Dr G Bangi 2.40 pm 36) group Discussion Standing Items 5 Chair's Update To update the Dr G Bangi 2.45 pm group Verbal Board Assurance 6 Governing Body Assurance To provide Mr M Gaunt 2.55 pm Framework and Corporate assurance Assurance Risk Register (Pages 37 - 104) Strategy 7 Integrated Care System (ICS) To update the Mr D Gizzi 3.05 pm Update (Pages 105 - 136) group Discussion 8 Integrated Care Partnership To update the Mr D Gizzi 3.15 pm (ICP) Update (Pages 137 - group Discussion 192) 9 Our Health Our Care (OHOC) To update the Mr D Gizzi 3.25 pm Programme Update (Pages group Discussion 193 - 200) Operational Delivery 10 Integrated Board Report To update the Mrs H Curtis 3.45 pm Agenda Chorley and South Ribble CCG Governing Body - Part 1 Meeting MEETING HELD IN PUBLIC (Pages 201 - 306) group Mr M Gaunt Mrs J Mellor Discussion 11 Financial Performance Report To update the Mr M Gaunt 3.50 pm (Pages 307 - 326) group Discussion Governance and Quality 12 Healthier Lancashire and To update the Mr M Gaunt
    [Show full text]
  • Collision Risk of Fish with Wave and Tidal Devices
    Commissioned by RPS Group plc on behalf of the Welsh Assembly Government Collision Risk of Fish with Wave and Tidal Devices Date: July 2010 Project Ref: R/3836/01 Report No: R.1516 Commissioned by RPS Group plc on behalf of the Welsh Assembly Government Collision Risk of Fish with Wave and Tidal Devices Date: July 2010 Project Ref: R/3836/01 Report No: R.1516 © ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd Version Details of Change Authorised By Date 1 Pre-Draft A J Pearson 06.03.09 2 Draft A J Pearson 01.05.09 3 Final C A Roberts 28.08.09 4 Final A J Pearson 17.12.09 5 Final C A Roberts 27.07.10 Document Authorisation Signature Date Project Manager: A J Pearson Quality Manager: C R Scott Project Director: S C Hull ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd Suite B, Waterside House Town Quay Tel: +44(0)23 8071 1840 SOUTHAMPTON Fax: +44(0)23 8071 1841 Hampshire Web: www.abpmer.co.uk SO14 2AQ Email: [email protected] Collision Risk of Fish with Wave and Tidal Devices Summary The Marine Renewable Energy Strategic Framework for Wales (MRESF) is seeking to provide for the sustainable development of marine renewable energy in Welsh waters. As one of the recommendations from the Stage 1 study, a requirement for further evaluation of fish collision risk with wave and tidal stream energy devices was identified. This report seeks to provide an objective assessment of the potential for fish to collide with wave or tidal devices, including a review of existing impact prediction and monitoring data where available.
    [Show full text]
  • Leyland Historical Society
    LEYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY (Founded 1968) Registered Charity No. 1024919 PRESIDENT Mr. W. E. Waring CHAIR VICE-CHAIR Mr. P. Houghton Mrs. E. F. Shorrock HONORARY SECRETARY HONORARY TREASURER Mr. M. J. Park Mr. E. Almond Tel: (01772) 337258 AIMS To promote an interest in history generally and that of the Leyland area in particular MEETINGS Held on the first Monday of each month (September to July inclusive) at 7.30 pm in The Shield Room, Banqueting Suite, Civic Centre, West Paddock, Leyland SUBSCRIPTIONS Vice Presidents: £10.00 per annum Members: £10.00 per annum School Members: £1.00 per annum Casual Visitors: £3.00 per meeting A MEMBER OF THE LANCASHIRE LOCAL HISTORY FEDERATION THE HISTORIC SOCIETY OF LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE and THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR LOCAL HISTORY Visit the Leyland Historical Society's Web Site at: http//www.leylandhistoricalsociety.co.uk C O N T E N T S Page Title Contributor 4 Editorial Mary Longton 5 Society Affairs Peter Houghton 7 From a Red Letter Day to days with Red Letters Joan Langford 11 Fascinating finds at Haydock Park Edward Almond 15 The Leyland and Farington Mechanics’ Institution Derek Wilkins Joseph Farington: 3rd December 1747 to Joan Langford 19 30th December 1821 ‘We once owned a Brewery’ – W & R Wilkins of Derek Wilkins 26 Longton 34 More wanderings and musings into Memory Lane Sylvia Thompson Railway trip notes – Leyland to Manchester Peter Houghton 38 Piccadilly Can you help with the ‘Industrial Heritage of Editor 52 Leyland’ project? Lailand Chronicle No. 56 Editorial Welcome to the fifty-sixth edition of the Lailand Chronicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of a Severn Barrage a REPORT PREPARED for the NGO STEERING GROUP
    Analysis of a Severn Barrage A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE NGO STEERING GROUP June 2008 © Frontier Economics Ltd, London. i Frontier Economics | June 2008 Analysis of a Severn Barrage Executive summary......................................................................................iv 1 Introduction .........................................................................................7 1.1 Background...................................................................................................7 1.2 Overview.......................................................................................................8 Part 1: What is the role of Government? 2 Approach ..............................................................................................9 3 The role of Government ..................................................................... 11 3.1 Rationale..................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Objectives .................................................................................................. 16 Part 2: How does a barrage compare? 4 Approach ............................................................................................ 19 4.1 General background ................................................................................. 19 4.2 Overview of approach to modelling ...................................................... 21 5 Analysis and discussion .....................................................................26 5.1 Sensitivity
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Annual Report and Accounts 2019–20
    Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Annual Report and Accounts 2019–20 @LancsHospitals Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Annual Report and Accounts 2019-20 Presented to Parliament pursuant to schedule 7, paragraph 25(4) (a) of the National Health Service Act 2006 ©2020 Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust CONTENTS • Overview 1 • Chairman’s and Chief Executive’s Welcome • Performance report 4 • Overview of performance 5 • Performance analysis 11 • Accountability report 20 • Directors’ report 21 • Remuneration report 53 • Staff report 65 • Disclosures set out in the NHS Foundation Trust Code of Governance 82 • NHS Improvement’s Single Oversight Framework 87 • Statement of accounting officer’s responsibilities 88 • Annual governance statement 90 • Council of Governors’ report 114 • Membership report 119 • Audit Committee report 124 • Quality report 131 • Financial review 239 • Independent auditors’ report to the Council of Governors on the financial statements 240 • Foreword to the accounts 250 • Statement of comprehensive income 251 • Statement of financial position 252 • Statement of changes in equity for the year 253 • Statement of cash flows 254 • Notes to the accounts 255 This symbol indicates that more information is available on our website: www.lancsteachinghospitals.nhs.uk Cover photograph: Caroline Watson, Health Care Assistant and Dr Rajesh Kumar, Associate Consultant in Anasethetics CHAIRMAN’S AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S WELCOME Welcome to our annual report for the financial year 2019-20, which sets out our achievements, activity and performance. The annual report is also an opportunity to share our vision and priorities at a time of significant pressure and change within the NHS. Well what a year 2020 has been so far! Clearly we are all living in very strange and uncertain times at the moment due to the Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Renewables
    January 2009 Number 324 MARINE RENEWABLES Britain has an EU mandated target to meet 15% of its account for less than 0.1% of the energy produced energy requirements from renewable sources by 2020. worldwide. The UK has the largest wave and tidal resources in Europe, so marine renewables are a candidate for Figure 1: Wave and Tidal Resources in contributing to this target. Around 15-20% of the UK’s the UK: 2 Coloured bands show wave electricity could potentially be produced from marine resources, with purple denoting the 1 renewable sources, but the technology is not mature. greatest resource. Red circles show This POSTnote considers the technologies available and some of the most significant tidal the environmental, economic and technological power sites. Tidal resources are closer challenges involved in their deployment. to shore than wave. Background Tidal Power • ‘Tidal stream’ devices use the flow of water due to tides to generate electricity. • ‘Tidal range’ devices use the change in height of water Government Support due to tides, using principles similar to a hydroelectric The Renewables Advisory Board (RAB), a government dam. There are only a few tidal ‘barrages’ (see Box 1). advisory body, suggests that to meet the EU target, 32% Tidal lagoons (structures built at sea to capture water of UK electricity must come from renewables by 2020. at high tides) are also possible. The government has set a further target to cut carbon Wave Power emissions by 80% by 2050. This has increased interest Wave devices use the motion of water caused by winds in all low carbon energy sources, including marine.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH WEST ENGLAND and the WAVE HUB 10 July 2009 NICK HARRINGTON – HEAD of MARINE ENERGY SOUTH WEST RDA WAVE & TIDAL RESOURCE
    SOUTH WEST ENGLAND AND THE WAVE HUB 10 July 2009 NICK HARRINGTON – HEAD OF MARINE ENERGY SOUTH WEST RDA WAVE & TIDAL RESOURCE • Could provide 15% - 20% of UK demand • European resource 290GW • Worldwide annual revenues of €65 - €200 billion WAVE POWER LEVELS IN kW/m OF CREST LENGTH IN EUROPEAN WATERS Source: Wave Energy Utilization in Europe (European Thematic Network on Marine Energy) TIDAL RESOURCE IN SW ENGLAND DECC TIDAL RESOURCE IN SW ENGLAND Marine “Shoots” Barrage Current 1GW Turbines “SeaGEN” * “Severn” Barrage 8GW “Outer” Barrage 15GW SOUTH WEST WAVE RESOURCE DECC WAVE HUB Source: JP Kenny WAVE HUB WAVE HUB PROVIDES • Consented sea area • Grid connected 5MW per berth at 11kV • Monitoring and testing • Opportunities to collaborate • Access to suppliers and research base • Experience of operations • Can be upgraded to 50MW with 33kV operation UK ROUTE TO COMMERCIALISATION R&D NaREC Demonstration Initial prototype EMEC Refined prototype Wave Hub Pre- commercial device Market entry with commercial product Market penetration TIMETABLE • Landowner agreements signed- June 2009 • Funding unconditional - June 2009 • Developer commitments - June 2009 • Operating and capital budgets confirmed - July 2009 • Decision to proceed - July 2009 • Order sub-sea cable - July 2009 • Set up operating company - Summer 2009 • Onshore works - Autumn 2009 • Tender installation contracts - Autumn/Winter 2009 • Cable and equipment delivery - Spring 2010 • Installation and commissioning - Summer 2010 CHALLENGES Devices • Demonstrate and improve performance
    [Show full text]