DOCSLIB.ORG

No. 14: the WILSFORD SITE, COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Archaeological Report No. 14 THE WILSFORD SITE (22-Co-S16) COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI A Late Mississippi Period Settlement in the Northern Yazoo Basin of Mississippi John M. Connaway Mississippi Department of Archives and History Jackson 1984 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Archaeological Report No. 14 Patricia Kay Galloway Series Editor Elbert R. Hilliard Director Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 84-620008 ISBN: 0-938896-40-7 Copyright 1984. All Rights Reserved Mississippi Department of Archives and History TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures, Plates, Tables ii-vi Acknowledgements vii Introduction 3 1969 Excavation 5 House Patterns and Miscellaneous Features 10 Burned Daub and Clay 25 House Reconstruction 40 Biophysical Environment 50 Parchman Phase Site Plans and Settlement Pattern 82 Artifacts 86 Radiocarbon Dates 91 Conclusions 93 Figures, Plates, Tables 95 Appendix A: Parchman Phase Site Comparisons 163 References 209 ii FIGURES 1. Wil[s]ford site sketch map made by Philip Phillips, 95 November 19, 1940. 2. Wilsford site surface features and house locations. 96 3. Plan of excavated areas showing relationship between 97 test units (based on grid A) and house features (based on grid B). 4. Plan of House 1 area showing ten-foot excavation grid 98 and postmold pattern. 5. Plan of House 1 area showing ten-foot excavation grid 99 and various feature locations. 6. Plan of House 1 area showing postmolds most likely 100 associated with House 1 wall trench pattern. 7. Plan of House 1 area showing postmold least likely 101 associated with House 1 wall trench pattern. 8. Vertical profiles and cross-sections of House 1 wall 102 trenches and postmolds. 9. Plan of House 2 area showing ten-foot excavation 104 grid, postmold pattern, and wall trenches of Houses 2, 3, and 4. 10. Plans of Houses 2, 3, and 4 (top to bottom) showing 105 probable existing associated postmolds. 11. Cross-sections of house centerposts and posthole 106 abutment trenches. 12. Relative levels of features. 107 13. Unusual daub objects. 108 14. Possible architectural styles of House 1. 109 15. Possible architectural styles of House 2. 110 16. Artist's concept of the Wilsford site showing 111 platform houses surrounding a plaza and pyramidal mound. iii FIGURES (continued) 17. U.S. General Land Office 1842 survey plat of the 112 Wilsford site locality. 18. Nodena Red and White var. Nodena bottle from 113 House 2 area, Feature~ 19. Ceramic vessels. 114 20. Distribution of Parchman Phase sites in the 115 Upper Sunflower - Coldwater River area, Mississippi. iv PLATES 1. View of Wilsford mound on November 19, 1940, 116 facing north (courtesy of Peabody Museum). 2. View of Wilsford mound on November 19, 1983, 117 facing north. 3. Aerial view of excavated house patterns (after 118 Connaway and McGahey 1970: Plate 15). 4. Aerial photograph of the Wilsford site locality 119 (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service). v TABLES 1. Summary of test excavations. 120 2. Postmold and trench depths in House 1. 122 3. Wall trench and house dimensions. 124 4. Wall trench depths. 125 5. House 1 postmold data. 126 6. House 2 postmold data. 127 7. House 3 postmold data. 128 8. House 4 postmold data. 129 9. Daub types. 130 10. Trees reported on three types of drainage-related 131 land in 1836-1842 county land surveys. 11. Charred wood samples from excavated houses. 132 12. (a) Other trees possibly available in the Wilsford area. 133 (b) Less common trees and shrubs possibly available 134 in the Wilsford area. 13. Plants and trees indicated by other carbonized 135 floral remains from the Wilsford excavation. 14. Measurements of certain carbonized cultigen remains 137 from Wilsford. 15. Uses of certain plants recovered from the Wilsford 138 excavation. 16. Selected edible understory plants possibly available 143 in the Wilsford area. 17. Wilsford site faunal remains. 146 18. Wilsford site faunal species analysis. 148 19. Allometric constants for biomass computation. 149 20. Faunal species possibly available for subsistence 150 in the northern Yazoo Basin. vi TABLES (continued) 21. Provenience of the Nodena vessel. 159 22. Dimensions of vessel an color motifs. 159 23. Dimensions of miniature vessel. 159 24. Wilsford site artifacts. 160 25. Radiocarbon dates. 162 26. Dickerson site (22-Co-502): Mississippian Ceramic Counts. 170 27. Salomon site (22-Co-504): Mississippian Ceramic Counts. 173 28. Carson site (22-Co-505): Mississippian Ceramic Counts. 180 29. Prowell site (22-Co-506): Mississippian Ceramic Counts. 183 30. Barbee site (22-Co-510): Mississippian Ceramic Counts. 184 31. Parchman Phase site (22-Co-511) : Mississippian Ceramic 187 Counts. 32. Hull Brake site (22-Co-515): Mississippian Ceramic 189 Counts. 33. Wilsford site (22-Co-516): Mississippian Ceramic 190 Counts. 34. Lula site (22-Co-517): Mississippian Ceramic Counts. 191 35. Posey Mound site (22-Qu-500): Mississippian Ceramic 193 Counts. 36. Whiting site (22-Qu-511): Mississippian Ceramic 194 Counts. 37. Aldison site (22-Qu-514): Mississippian Ceramic Counts. 196 38. West Mounds site (22-Tu-520): Mississippian Ceramic 198 Counts. 39. Canon site (22-Tu-523): Mississippian Ceramic Counts. 200 vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks are due Mr. C. M. Allen for his interest in the project. Not only did he grant permission for excavation, he also generously gave up a portion of his cotton crop on the site and provided mechanized equipment for the removal of the plow zone and for backfilling the excavation. Appreciation is also extended to the University of Mississippi Department of Anthropology and the summer (1969) field students who ably assisted in the excavation. They included Angela Rodrigue, Don Browning, John Bowen, Terry Stone, Richard Winterholler, John Poulsen, and Rupert Chapman, as well as Harold Hill, Lisa Larson, Beth Gillis, and Byron Inmon, who remained at the site an extra month to help complete the work. Thanks are also extended to Sam McGahey of the Mississippi Department of Archives and History for his assistance in the field, Leonard Blake of the Missouri Botanical Garden and Richard Yarnell of the University of North Carolina for identifying the plant re~ins, Dr. Betty Lee Brandau and Dr. John Noakes of the University of Georgia Geochronology Laboratory for the radiocarbon dates, Dr. B. F. Kukachka of the U.S. Forest Service's Forest Products Laboratory for identifica­ tion of charred wood, Dr. Jeffrey P. Brain of the Peabody Museum for Lower Valley Survey records of the site, Dr. James B. Griffin of the University of Michigan for information on the first survey of the site, Robert C. Wilson of the University of Florida for identification of faunal remains, Coahoma Electric Power Association for the use of their truck for photographs, and the office of the Mississippi Secretary of State, Public Lands Division, for the 1833-1842 land survey plats and notes. Special thanks are extended to Dr. Pat Galloway and Mrs. Mary H. Mingee for their indispensable support and assistance in the editing and production of this publication, and to Mary Evelyn Starr for the many voluntary hours spent in preparing the Appendix. This publication is dedicated to the memory of Thomas H. Koehler, assistant professor of anthropology at the University of Mississippi and director of the 1969 summer field school, and John E. Warren, photographer and amateur archaeologist from Clarksdale, Mississippi. THE WILSFORD SITE (22-Co-S16) Coahoma County, Mississippi 3 INTRODUCTION The Wilsford Site was first reported by Phillips, Ford, and Griffin in their Archaeological Survey of the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley as "Wilford" (1951: 52), misnamed after the Wilsford family upon whose land the site was situated. This error is hereby corrected. The site was located and collected from in November, 1940, by Philip Phillips, who described it on the Peabody Museum site card as a small site with one small perfectly preserved rectangular mound and one small area with abundant daub and some pottery. The mound is in astonishing shape in spite of the small size, the corners and ramp can be made out and measured with considerable precision. There is a large stump squarely on the ramp which precludes its being anything in the nature of a recent addition. Small amounts of daub were seen in the cotton field on all sides of the mound for a limited distance but very little pottery. This small collection comes entirely from a small rise north of the mound which judging from the abundance of daub was probably a small house mound (James B. Griffin, personal communication). In the Phillips, Ford, and Griffin volume (1951:52), the site was given the Peabody Museum number 15-0-10, and was described as a "village site with small rectangular platform mound and small mound." Phillips' sketch map of the site (Figure 1) shows the position and orientation of the larger mound. Plate 1 is a view of the mound taken by Phillips on November 19, 1940. Plate 2 shows the same view (facing north) taken by the author on November 19, 1982, 42 years later, showing essentially little change. The ramp and corners have probably eroded somewhat, since they do not appear as pronounced as Phillips described them. His sketch map depicts a composite split-level mound, the larger portion with ramp being slightly higher than that to its rear. Presently, the mound shows a more gradual change in surface contour and is more ovoid in shape, all due no doubt to gradual erosion. Phillips, Ford, and Griffin give its height as 10 feet and refer to it as a "Type A" mound (square with ramp and apron) oriented northeast (1951:320). Basal dimensions are presently ca. 160 feet long by 120 feet wide, essentially the same length but-about 20 feet wider than the dimensions shown on Phillips' map (Figure 1).
Recommended publications
  • Cherokee Ethnogenesis in Southwestern North Carolina

    Cherokee Ethnogenesis in Southwestern North Carolina

    The following chapter is from: The Archaeology of North Carolina: Three Archaeological Symposia Charles R. Ewen – Co-Editor Thomas R. Whyte – Co-Editor R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr. – Co-Editor North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication Number 30 2011 Available online at: http://www.rla.unc.edu/NCAC/Publications/NCAC30/index.html CHEROKEE ETHNOGENESIS IN SOUTHWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA Christopher B. Rodning Dozens of Cherokee towns dotted the river valleys of the Appalachian Summit province in southwestern North Carolina during the eighteenth century (Figure 16-1; Dickens 1967, 1978, 1979; Perdue 1998; Persico 1979; Shumate et al. 2005; Smith 1979). What developments led to the formation of these Cherokee towns? Of course, native people had been living in the Appalachian Summit for thousands of years, through the Paleoindian, Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippi periods (Dickens 1976; Keel 1976; Purrington 1983; Ward and Davis 1999). What are the archaeological correlates of Cherokee culture, when are they visible archaeologically, and what can archaeology contribute to knowledge of the origins and development of Cherokee culture in southwestern North Carolina? Archaeologists, myself included, have often focused on the characteristics of pottery and other artifacts as clues about the development of Cherokee culture, which is a valid approach, but not the only approach (Dickens 1978, 1979, 1986; Hally 1986; Riggs and Rodning 2002; Rodning 2008; Schroedl 1986a; Wilson and Rodning 2002). In this paper (see also Rodning 2009a, 2010a, 2011b), I focus on the development of Cherokee towns and townhouses. Given the significance of towns and town affiliations to Cherokee identity and landscape during the 1700s (Boulware 2011; Chambers 2010; Smith 1979), I suggest that tracing the development of towns and townhouses helps us understand Cherokee ethnogenesis, more generally.
  • A Many-Storied Place

    A Many-Storied Place

    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
  • SEAC Bulletin 58.Pdf

    SEAC Bulletin 58.Pdf

    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 72ND ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 18-21, 2015 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE BULLETIN 58 SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE BULLETIN 58 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 72ND ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 18-21, 2015 DOUBLETREE BY HILTON DOWNTOWN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE Organized by: Kevin E. Smith, Aaron Deter-Wolf, Phillip Hodge, Shannon Hodge, Sarah Levithol, Michael C. Moore, and Tanya M. Peres Hosted by: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Middle Tennessee State University Division of Archaeology, Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Office of Social and Cultural Resources, Tennessee Department of Transportation iii Cover: Sellars Mississippian Ancestral Pair. Left: McClung Museum of Natural History and Culture; Right: John C. Waggoner, Jr. Photographs by David H. Dye Printing of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 58 – 2015 Funded by Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Authorization No. 327420, 750 copies. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $4.08 per copy. October 2015. Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s Policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in its programs, services or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, EEO/AA Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 2nd floor, William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-888-867-7455. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the ADA Coordinator, Human Resources Division, 312 Rosa L.
  • Public Hearing, Report

    Public Hearing, Report

    AGENDA ITEM ST. JOHNS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 4 Deadline for Submission - Wednesday 9 a.m. – Thirteen Days Prior to BCC Meeting 12/1/2020 BCC MEETING DATE TO: Hunter S. Conrad, County Administrator DATE: October 29, 2020 FROM: Justin Kelly, Senior Planner PHONE: 904 209-0728 SUBJECT OR TITLE: CPA (SS) 2020-04 Bell Covered Storage AGENDA TYPE: Business Item, Ordinance, Public Hearing, Report BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Adoption of CPA (SS) 2020-04 Bell Covered Storage, a request for a Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use designation of approximately 1.16 acres of land located along Old Dixie Highway, north of Cross Ridge Drive and south of the Nocatee Parkway, from Rural/Silviculture (R/S) to Mixed Use District (MD). This request was heard by the Planning and Zoning Agency at their regularly scheduled public hearing on November 5, 2020. Agency members voted 6-1 to recommend approval. 1. IS FUNDING REQUIRED? No 2. IF YES, INDICATE IF BUDGETED. No IF FUNDING IS REQUIRED, MANDATORY OMB REVIEW IS REQUIRED: INDICATE FUNDING SOURCE: SUGGESTED MOTION/RECOMMENDATION/ACTION: Motion to enact Ordinance 2020-_____, adopting CPA (SS) 2020-04 Bell Covered Storage, a request for a Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use designation of approximately 1.16 acres of land from Rural/Silviculture (R/S) to Mixed Use District (MD), based upon four (4) Findings of Fact, as provided in the Staff Report. Motion to deny CPA (SS) 2020-04 Bell Covered Storage, based upon four (4) Findings of Fact, as provided in the Staff Report.
  • Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St

    Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St

    LATE MISSISSIPPIAN CERAMIC PRODUCTION ON ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA Anna M. Semon A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Vincas P. Steponaitis C. Margaret Scarry R. P. Stephen Davis Anna Agbe-Davis John Scarry © 2019 Anna M. Semon ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Anna M. Semon: Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St. Catherines Island, Georgia (Under the direction of Vincas P. Steponaitis) This dissertation examines Late Mississippian pottery manufacturing on St. Catherines Island, Georgia. Data collected from five ceramic assemblages, three village and two mortuary sites, were used to characterize each ceramic assemblage and examine small-scale ceramic variations associated with learning and making pottery, which reflect pottery communities of practice. In addition, I examined pottery decorations to investigate social interactions at community and household levels. This dissertation is organized in six chapters. Chapter 1 provides the background, theoretical framework, and objectives of this research. Chapter 2 describes coastal Georgia’s culture history, with focus on the Mississippian period. Chapters 3 and 4 present the methods and results of this study. I use both ceramic typology and attribute analyses to explore ceramic variation. Chapter 3 provides details about the ceramic typology for each site. In addition, I examine the Mississippian surface treatments for each assemblage and identified ceramic changes between middle Irene (A.D. 1350–1450), late Irene (A.D. 1450–1580), and early Mission (A.D. 1580–1600) period.
  • I. a Consideration of Tine and Labor Expenditurein the Constrijction Process at the Teotihuacan Pyramid of the Sun and the Pover

    I. a Consideration of Tine and Labor Expenditurein the Constrijction Process at the Teotihuacan Pyramid of the Sun and the Pover

    I. A CONSIDERATION OF TINE AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRIJCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT MOUND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore 40 II. A CONSIDERATION OF TIME AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT 14)UND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore INTRODUCT ION In considering the subject of prehistoric earthmoving and the construction of monuments associated with it, there are many variables for which some sort of control must be achieved before any feasible demographic features related to the labor involved in such construction can be derived. Many of the variables that must be considered can be given support only through certain fundamental assumptions based upon observations of related extant phenomena. Many of these observations are contained in the ethnographic record of aboriginal cultures of the world whose activities and subsistence patterns are more closely related to the prehistoric cultures of a particular area. In other instances, support can be gathered from observations of current manual labor related to earth moving since the prehistoric constructions were accomplished manually by a human labor force. The material herein will present alternative ways of arriving at the represented phenomena. What is inherently important in considering these data is the element of cultural organization involved in such activities. One need only look at sites such as the Valley of the Kings and the great pyramids of Egypt, Teotihuacan, La Venta and Chichen Itza in Mexico, the Cahokia mound group in Illinois, and other such sites to realize that considerable time, effort and organization were required.
  • Further Investigations Into the King George

    Further Investigations Into the King George

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22) Harry Gene Brignac Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brignac Jr, Harry Gene, "Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22)" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2720. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2720 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE KING GEORGE ISLAND MOUNDS SITE (16LV22) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology By Harry Gene Brignac Jr. B.A. Louisiana State University, 2003 May, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God for surrounding me with the people in my life who have guided and supported me in this and all of my endeavors. I have to express my greatest appreciation to Dr. Rebecca Saunders for her professional guidance during this entire process, and for her inspiration and constant motivation for me to become the best archaeologist I can be.
  • The FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY CONTENTS Major-General John Campbell in British West Florida George C

    The FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY CONTENTS Major-General John Campbell in British West Florida George C

    Volume XXVII April 1949 Number 4 The FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY CONTENTS Major-General John Campbell in British West Florida George C. Osborn Nocoroco, a Timucua Village of 1605 John W. Griffin Hale G. Smith The Founder of the Seminole Nation Kenneth W. Porter A Connecticut Yankee after Olustee Letters from the front Vaughn D. Bornet Book reviews: Kathryn Abbey Hanna: “Florida Land of Change” Paul Murray: “The Whig Party in Georgia, 1825-1853” Herbert J. Doherty Jr. Local History: “The Story of Fort Myers” Pensacola Traditions The Early Southwest Coast Early Orlando “They All Call it Tropical” The Florida Historical Society A noteworthy gift to our library List of members Contributors to this number SUBSCRIPTION FOUR DOLLARS SINGLE COPIES ONE DOLLAR (Copyright, 1949, by the Florida Historical Society. Reentered as second class matter November 21, 1947, at the post office at Tallahassee, Florida, under the Act of August 24, 1912.) Office of publication, Tallahassee, Florida Published quarterly by THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY St. Augustine, Florida MAJOR-GENERAL JOHN CAMPBELL IN BRITISH WEST FLORIDA by GEORGE C. OSBORN Late in the autumn of 1778 Brigadier-General John Campbell received a communication from Lord George Germain to proceed from the colony of New York to Pensacola, Province of West Florida.1 In this imperial province, which was bounded on the west by the Missis- sippi river, Lake Ponchartrain and the Iberville river, on the south by the Gulf of Mexico, on the east by the Apalachicola river and on the north by the thirty-first parallel but later by a line drawn eastward from the mouth of the Yazoo river,2 General Campbell was to take command of His Majesty’s troops.
  • Current Archaeology in Kansas

    Current Archaeology in Kansas

    Current Archaeology in Kansas Number 6 2006 Contents Title and Author(s) Page The D. Heasty Cache Revisited – Donald J. Blakeslee 1 Eckles Collection from the Montana Creek Sites, Lovewell Locality, Jewell County, Kansas - Lauren W. Ritterbush 5 Archaeological Excavation Adjacent to Fort Osage - Jim D. Feagins 17 Ceramic Period Components at the Claussen Site, 14WB322 - Donna C. Roper 18 The 2005 Kansas Obsidian Sourcing Project - C. Tod Bevitt 23 Dyche Collection from the Fanning Site - Jim D. Feagins 30 The Phil Site House: Analysis of a Central Plains Tradition Lodge, Lovewell Reservoir, North-Central Kansas - Brad Logan and Sarah J. Meitl 31 An Archaeological Survey of Front Nine: Fort Hays Municipal Golf Course, Ellis County - Mark A. Latham, Susan Houghton, and C. Tod Bevitt 38 Searching for Dr. Doy?: Archaeology and the Underground Railroad in Douglas County, Kansas - Margaret C. Wood 40 A Small Survey on the Walnut River - David T. Hughes 46 Archaeological Survey in the Stranger Creek Basin-2005: A Progress Report - Brad Logan 54 Printing of this issue of Current Archaeology in Kansas was provided by the Kansas State Historical Society The D.Heasty Cache Revisited Donald J. Blakeslee Wichita State University Introduction Since the donation has enlarged the original In 1985, Dale Heasty found a lithic cache collection significantly, this brief report re- in Sumner County, Kansas. It was located in a small examines the cache and presents the pertinent data. pit on a site of unknown cultural affiliation near the Chikaskia River. His son, Don Heasty, eventually donated 28 specimens from the cache to Wichita State University.
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River

    Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River

    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
  • Teaching the First American Civilization Recognizing the Moundbui

    Teaching the First American Civilization Recognizing the Moundbui

    The Councilor: A Journal of the Social Studies Volume 77 Article 2 Number 2 Volume 77 No. 2 (2016) June 2016 Teaching The irsF t American Civilization Recognizing The oundM builders as a Great Native-American Civilization Jack Zevin Queens College/CUNY Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/the_councilor Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Elementary Education Commons, Elementary Education and Teaching Commons, Geography Commons, Junior High, Intermediate, Middle School Education and Teaching Commons, and the Pre- Elementary, Early Childhood, Kindergarten Teacher Education Commons Recommended Citation Zevin, Jack (2016) "Teaching The irF st American Civilization Recognizing The oundM builders as a Great Native-American Civilization," The Councilor: A Journal of the Social Studies: Vol. 77 : No. 2 , Article 2. Available at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/the_councilor/vol77/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in The ouncC ilor: A Journal of the Social Studies by an authorized editor of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Zevin: Teaching The First American Civilization Recognizing The Moundbui Teaching The First American Civilization Recognizing The Moundbuilders as a Great Native-American Civilization Jack Zevin Queens College/CUNY The Moundbuilders are a culture of mystery, little recognized by most Americans, yet they created farms, villages, towns, and cities covering as much as a third of the United States. Social studies teachers have yet to mine the resources left us over thousands of years by the native artisans and builders who preceded the nations European explorers came into contact with after 1492.
  • Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site

    Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site

    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site Benjamin Garrett Davis University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Benjamin Garrett, "Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1570. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1570 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOUSEHOLDS AND CHANGING USE OF SPACE AT THE TRANSITIONAL EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN AUSTIN SITE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of Mississippi by BENJAMIN GARRETT DAVIS May 2019 ABSTRACT The Austin Site (22TU549) is a village site located in Tunica County, Mississippi dating to approximately A.D. 1150-1350, along the transition from the Terminal Late Woodland to the Mississippian period. While Elizabeth Hunt’s (2017) masters thesis concluded that the ceramics at Austin emphasized a Late Woodland persistence, the architecture and use of space at the site had yet to be analyzed. This study examines this architecture and use of space over time at Austin to determine if they display evidence of increasing institutionalized inequality. This included creating a map of Austin based on John Connaway’s original excavation notes, and then analyzing this map within the temporal context of the upper Yazoo Basin.