DOCSLIB.ORG

Class Notes on Morphophonology and Morphology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Class Notes on Morphophonology and Morphology Class Discussion, February 28 1.0 Morphophonology • PHONOLOGY: The component of a grammar made up of the elements and principles that determine how sounds pattern in a language • MORPHOLOGY: The system of categories and rules involved in word formation and interpretation. o MORPHEME: the smallest unit of language that carries information about meaning or function • MORPHOPHONOLOGY: The study of the interaction of word formation with the sound system of a language. • In phonology, we studied the relationship between phonemes vs. allophones. • In morphology, we are interested in the relationship between the underlying forms of morphemes and their allomorphs o ALLOMORPH: variants of a morpheme whose distribution is determined by their phonological environment • We can write rules describing the relationship between the underlying form of a morpheme and its allomorphs in much the same way that we wrote phonological rules. • For rules involving morphemes (segments of sound with meaning attached), don’t worry about writing the underlying form and the allomorphs in terms of features. Just write the forms. o But: put the environment in phonological features. • The rules that determine the distribution of allomorphs are subject to many of the same considerations as found with phonological rules. o Place and manner of articulation assimilation for ease of pronunciation o Application of processes like epenthesis or deletion to create a particular phonotactic structure allowed by the language. 1 1.1 Russian Example [otjexatʲ] ‘to have ridden off’ [otstupitʲ] ‘to have stepped back’ [odbrositʲ] ‘to have thrown aside’ • What prefixes do you see in the data set? • No minimal pairs in the data set above, but…Do we want to say that Russian lacks phonemes /d/, and /t/? Nope. There are minimal pairs elsewhere in the language. [ta] ‘that’ [da] ‘yes’ • In the ot/od alternation, we are concerned with prefixes that have meaning. They are morphemes. o /t/ and /d/ the phonemes are just sounds. They don’t have any meaning attached. Writing a rule: • Figure out what the underlying form of the prefix is: [ot] [od] #_j #_b #_s • Given the small data set, it is a little hard to tell, but since voicing seems important (that is the difference between [od] and [ot]), is there one form of the morpheme that only occurs in an environment with other phones of some particular value for [voiced]? o [ot]: [j] is [+voiced], [s] is [-voiced] o [od]: [b] is [+voiced] /ot COMPLETED/ has two allomorphs, [od] and [ot] /ot COMPLETED/ [od-] / __[+voiced, -continuant] [ot-] / __ /elsewhere 2 1.2 English Plural Morphology • This question, like Russian, deals with multiple allomorphs of a single morpheme. [kæts] *[kætz] [lɪps] *[lɪpz] [dɑɡz] *[dɑɡs] [fɪbz] *[fɪbs] [kaʊz] *[kaʊs] [kɑrz] *[kɑrs] • Do we want to say that [s] and [z] are allophones of a single morpheme? / z / [s] / (in some environment) [z] / elsewhere • No, because we can find minimal pairs in English illustrating that English has phonemes /s/ and /z/. [sɪt] and [zɪt] • As a result, we can’t say that [s] is really just an allophone of /z/ (or vice versa) • However, at the end of a word, we see that the distribution of [s] and [z] is dependent on the phone adjacent to it: if the last phone in the word is [+voiced], use [z]. If the last phone in the word is [-voiced], use [s]. • Can we write the rule like this? Let’s say that /z/ is the underlying form here. /z/ [z], elsewhere [s] / [-voiced] __ σ Now, we can’t finish here. What does this rule predict? (This rule predicts that the word [sɪt] isn’t possible in English…it should just surface as [zɪt]. [s] only surfaces when in a coda after a [- voiced] phone. /zɪt/ [zɪt] • So, how can we distinguish between /z/ and [s] in the data set above and /z/ and /s/ in words like [zɪt] and [sɪt]? 3 • The instances of /z/ that we’re interested in the data set above have something in common with each other: they carry meaning. They indicate that we’re talking about multiple cats or dogs or cows, etc. • The sounds [s] and [z] in words like [sɪt] and [zɪt] don’t mean anything. o They are just phones in the language, whereas /z/ with its plural meaning is a MORPHEME. • MORPHEME: the smallest unit of language that carries information about meaning or function • Morphophonology: the interaction of word formation (morphology) with sound systems of languages (phonology). o Morphemes have underlying (or mental) representations, like phonemes. And there are also surface forms called ALLOMORPHS (like ALLOPHONE). • We’ll write a rule that links meaning to pronunciation. It will tell us where a morpheme with some underlying form (like /z/) is realized with some other form. • For rules involving morphemes (segments of sound with meaning attached), don’t worry about writing the underlying form and the allomorphs in terms of features. Just write the forms. Put the environment in features. • For now, I will just tell that the /z PLURAL/ is the underlying form. We’ll get back later to why I think this is true. / z PLURAL / [s PLURAL] / [-voiced] __ | [z PLURAL] / elsewhere • We’ve already seen that manner of articulation assimilation (voicing) happens with morphemes and their allomorphs (Russian). • Other processes that we’ve seen happening for phones also happen with morphemes. • Epenthesis: [fɪʃɪz] *[fɪʃz] *[fɪʃs] [lɑsɪz] *[lɑsz] *[lɑss] [lɪzɪz] *[lɪzz] • What is the configuration of sounds that seems to be violated in the starred words in the far right column? Write a phonotactic constraint. o Two [+strident] sounds can’t be adjacent in a coda. 4 • What form does the plural morpheme take in order to avoid violation of this phonotactic constraint? • We can add the form to our list of rules. / z PLURAL / [s PLURAL] / [-voiced] __ | [ɪz PLURAL] / [+strident] [z PLURAL] / elsewhere Why did I pick /z PLURAL/? First piece of evidence: Our coda constraints wouldn’t rule out the *-marked (ungrammatical) form below, but my intuitions are that I pronounce it with [-z]. We should make the underlying [-z] because our rules would permit us to keep [kɑls]. [kɑlz] ‘calls’ *[kɑls] but! [fɑls] ‘false’ Second piece of evidence: One change to get to [s PLURAL] (voicing) one change to get to [ɪz PLURAL] (epenthesis) What if I picked /s PLURAL/? One change to get to [z PLURAL (voicing) Two changes to get to [ɪz PLURAL] /s/ [ɪs] (epenthesis) [ɪs] [ɪz] (voicing assimilation, where I assume all vowels are [+voiced]) 5 2.0 Morphology • MORPHEME: smallest unit of language that carries information about meaning or function o SIMPLE WORDS: words that consist of a single morpheme; they can’t be divided further o COMPLEX WORDS: words consisting of more than one morpheme; they can be divided further • ‘cat’ = a simple word: one morpheme, [kæt] • ‘cats’ = a complex word [kæt] + [s PLURAL] • ‘swanboat’ = a complex word [swɑn] + [bot] • ‘swanboat’ consists of two of the same type of morphemes o ‘swan’ and ‘boat’ are both FREE MORPHEMES: both can be a word can be a word by itself • ‘cats’ consists of two different types of morphemes. o [kæt] is a free morpheme: it can be a word by itself o [s PLURAL] is a bound morpheme: it can’t be a word by itself 6 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morphophonology of Magahi
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN: 2319-7064 SJIF (2019): 7.583 Morphophonology of Magahi Saloni Priya Jawaharlal Nehru University, SLL & CS, New Delhi, India Salonipriya17[at]gmail.com Abstract: Every languages has different types of word formation processes and each and every segment of morphology has a sound. The following paper is concerned with the sound changes or phonemic changes that occur during the word formation process in Magahi. Magahi is an Indo- Aryan Language spoken in eastern parts of Bihar and also in some parts of Jharkhand and West Bengal. The term Morphophonology refers to the interaction of word formation with the sound systems of a language. The paper finds out the phonetic rules interacting with the morphology of lexicons of Magahi. The observations shows that he most frequent morphophonological process are Sandhi, assimilation, Metathesis and Epenthesis. Whereas, the process of Dissimilation, Lenition and Fortition are very Uncommon in nature. Keywords: Morphology, Phonology, Sound Changes, Word formation process, Magahi, Words, Vowels, Consonants 1. Introduction 3.1 The Sources of Magahi Glossary Morphophonology refers to the interaction between Magahi has three kind of vocabulary sources; morphological and phonological or its phonetic processes. i) In the first category, it has those lexemes which has The aim of this paper is to give a detailed account on the been processed or influenced by Sanskrit, Prakrit, sound changes that take place in morphemes, when they Apbhransh, ect. Like, combine to form new words in the language. धमम> ध륍म> धरम, स셍म> सꥍ셍> सााँ셍 ii) In the second category, it has those words which are 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in Ho Morphosyntax and Morphophonology
    TOPICS IN HO MORPHOPHONOLOGY AND MORPHOSYNTAX by ANNA PUCILOWSKI A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Linguistics and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2013 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Anna Pucilowski Title: Topics in Ho Morphophonology and Morphosyntax This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Linguistics by: Dr. Doris Payne Chair Dr. Scott Delancey Member Dr. Spike Gildea Member Dr. Zhuo Jing-Schmidt Outside Member Dr. Gregory D. S. Anderson Non-UO Member and Kimberly Andrews Espy Vice President for Research & Innovation/ Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2013 ii c 2013 Anna Pucilowski iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Anna Pucilowski Doctor of Philosophy Department of Linguistics June 2013 Title: Topics in Ho Morphophonology and Morphosyntax Ho, an under-documented North Munda language of India, is known for its complex verb forms. This dissertation focuses on analysis of several features of those complex verbs, using data from original fieldwork undertaken by the author. By way of background, an analysis of the phonetics, phonology and morphophonology of Ho is first presented. Ho has vowel harmony based on height, and like other Munda languages, the phonological word is restricted to two moras. There has been a long-standing debate over whether Ho and the other North Munda languages have word classes, including verbs as distinct from nouns.
    [Show full text]
  • LING 211 – Introduction to Linguistic Analysis
    LING 211 – Introduction to Linguistic Analysis Section 01: TTh 1:40–3:00 PM, Eliot 103 Section 02: TTh 3:10–4:30 PM, Eliot 103 Course Syllabus Fall 2019 Sameer ud Dowla Khan Matt Pearson pronoun: he or they he office: Eliot 101C Vollum 313 email: [email protected] [email protected] phone: ext. 4018 (503-517-4018) ext. 7618 (503-517-7618) office hours: Wed, 11:00–1:00 Mon, 2:30–4:00 Fri, 1:00–2:00 Tue, 10:00–11:30 (or by appointment) (or by appointment) PREREQUISITES There are no prerequisites for this course, other than an interest in language. Some familiarity with tradi- tional grammar terms such as noun, verb, preposition, syllable, consonant, vowel, phrase, clause, sentence, etc., would be useful, but is by no means required. CONTENT AND FOCUS OF THE COURSE This course is an introduction to the scientific study of human language. Starting from basic questions such as “What is language?” and “What do we know when we know a language?”, we investigate the human language faculty through the hands-on analysis of naturalistic data from a variety of languages spoken around the world. We adopt a broadly cognitive viewpoint throughout, investigating language as a system of knowledge within the mind of the language user (a mental grammar), which can be studied empirically and represented using formal models. To make this task simpler, we will generally treat languages as though they were static systems. For example, we will assume that it is possible to describe a language structure synchronically (i.e., as it exists at a specific point in history), ignoring the fact that languages constantly change over time.
    [Show full text]
  • David Eddington
    1 David Eddington Brigham Young University Morphophonological Alternations Introduction Morphophonology is the study of how word formation interacts with phonology. The domain of phonology proper is concerned with identifying phonemes, the allophones of each phoneme, and the context in which the allophones appear. For example, [d] and [ð] are both allophones of /d/: [d] appears post-pausally and post-nasally while [ð] occurs elsewhere. This phonological alternation is generally considered exceptionless, which contrasts it with morphophological processes that have many exceptions. In morphophonology, not only may allophones of the same phoneme be involved in an alternation, but allophones of different phonemes may alternate. So, although [t] and [s] belong to different phonemes they alternate in the morpheme /perßert-/ 'pervert' when it is followed by different affixes: /perßert+ir/ 'to pervert,' /perßers+o/ 'perverted'. Morphophonological alternations are quite common in both the derivational and inflectional morphology of Spanish. For instance, the alternation between [t] and [θ] (e.g., /inyekt+ar/ ~ /inyekθ+jon/ 'inject, injection') has received attention by researchers (Harris 1969, Núñez 1993) as have the [o] ~ [we] and [e] ~ [je] alternations (e.g., /tost+ar/ ~ /twest+an/, 'to toast, they toast,' /tjen+e/ ~ /ten+emos/ 'it has, we have' (Bybee & Pardo 1981, Carreira 1991, García-Bellido 1986, Eddington 2006, Harris 1969, 1977, 1978, 1985, 1989, Halle, Harris & Vergnaud 1991, St. Clair 1971). On the other hand, 2 alternations such as [f] ~ [Ø] as in /fum+ar/ ~ /um+o/ 'to smoke, smoke,' and [ð] ~ [ß] as in /ßiß+ir/ ~ /ßið+a/ 'to live, life' are rarely discussed in any systematic fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability in the Learning of Complex Morphophonology
    Applied Psycholinguistics 35 (2014), 807–831 doi:10.1017/S0142716412000586 Variability in the learning of complex morphophonology MARC ETTLINGER Northwestern University and Department of Veterans Affairs ANN R. BRADLOW Northwestern University PATRICK C. M. WONG Chinese University of Hong Kong and Northwestern University Received: August 2, 2011 Accepted for publication: May 7, 2012 ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Patrick Wong, Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper explores how theories on the relationship between language and domain-general cognitive capabilities might account for individual variation in second language learning. We investigated the acquisition of a morphophonological grammar paired with standardized tests of memory function. The language learned had simple and complex morphophonological patterns of word formation, which are hypothesized to correlate with standardized measures of procedural and declarative memory, respectively. The results show a significant amount of variation in learning success is accounted for by these measures of memory in accordance with the hypothesis. These findings help explain why some adults are able to learn a second language more easily than others while also advancing a model of second language learning motivated by linguistic theory. Studies have shown that adult second language (L2) learning is characterized by appreciable individual differences
    [Show full text]
  • 26 Orthography; Phonetic and Phonological Aspects
    1 ORTHOGRAPHY; PHONETIC AND PHONOLOGICAL ASPECTS This chapter deals with issues of orthography which have implications for our understanding of the phonology of Amurru Akkadian. It is my belief that when dealing with this language, a written language with a deep-rooted scholarly tradition, this is how one should deal with phonological issues, i.e., it is better not to separate discussions of orthographical questions from discussions of explicitly linguistic problems. A short survey of the following sections may pinpoint the need for thorough research into the orthography and writing habits of each of the subcorpora, of yet smaller reference groups of texts, and even of each of the specific scribes, in order to understand the syllabary system of either a single text or of the whole corpus. A certain scribe may use different signs for the indication of a single value in a more or less unsystematic manner, as is the case with the scribe of the General's Letter (RS 20.33). However, we do fiud certain learned customary spellings which are subject to alternation in the writing of this and other scribes. In such cases, there can be no arbitrary use of signs. The use of a relatively rigid syllabary is, in general, the rule when trying to describe the writing systems of the scribes of Amurru, as we shall see in the following discussions. General Akkadian phonological rules, as well as dialect-specific rules of any of the core Akkadian languages, will not be discussed in this chapter, unless they are unequivocally related to the study of the phonological systems of our texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Productivity in Historical Linguistics Computational Perspectives on Word-Formation in Ancient Greek and Sanskrit
    University of California Los Angeles Productivity in Historical Linguistics Computational Perspectives on Word-Formation in Ancient Greek and Sanskrit A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Indo-European Studies by Ryan Paul Sandell 2015 © Copyright by Ryan Paul Sandell 2015 Abstract of the Dissertation Productivity in Historical Linguistics Computational Perspectives on Word-Formation in Ancient Greek and Sanskrit by Ryan Paul Sandell Doctor of Philosophy in Indo-European Studies University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Brent Harmon Vine, Chair “Productivity” is a simultaneously familiar and fraught topic for all linguists. Every linguist believes that he can recognize it, yet grasping what properties characterize a “productive” process in opposition to a non-productive one is difficult. The historical linguist ought to be particularly desperate for a definition that can be operationalized – distinguishing ar- chaism from innovation depends upon it. This dissertation is therefore first concerned with transforming “productivity” into an object that can be interrogated, and then seeking tools that can provide a useful characterization that object. On the explicitly diachronic side, I am concerned with how to measure, diagnose, and motivate changes in productivity. Cor- pora from two the oldest-attested Indo-European languages, Ancient Greek (here, mainly the Iliad and Odyssey, as well as the New Testament) and Vedic Sanskrit (here, mainly the R̥gveda) will guide and define these explorations. Within the realm of morphology and word- formation especially, I will argue that concerns about productivity rightly take pride of place in diachronic discussion, and that those discussions become more meaningful when made precise and psychologically motivated.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability in the Learning of Complex Morphophonology
    Applied Psycholinguistics, page 1 of 25, 2012 doi:10.1017/S0142716412000586 Variability in the learning of complex morphophonology MARC ETTLINGER Northwestern University and Department of Veterans Affairs ANN R. BRADLOW Northwestern University PATRICK C. M. WONG Chinese University of Hong Kong and Northwestern University Received: August 2, 2011 Accepted for publication: May 7, 2012 ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Patrick Wong, Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper explores how theories on the relationship between language and domain-general cognitive capabilities might account for individual variation in second language learning. We investigated the acquisition of a morphophonological grammar paired with standardized tests of memory function. The language learned had simple and complex morphophonological patterns of word formation, which are hypothesized to correlate with standardized measures of procedural and declarative memory, respectively. The results show a significant amount of variation in learning success is accounted for by these measures of memory in accordance with the hypothesis. These findings help explain why some adults are able to learn a second language more easily than others while also advancing a model of second language learning motivated by linguistic theory. Studies have shown that adult second language (L2) learning is characterized by appreciable individual differences
    [Show full text]
  • The Basics of Tlingit Verbal Structure
    The Basics of Tlingit Verbal Structure James A. Crippen Department of Linguistics, University of British Columbia [email protected] Dzéiwsh Kaaḵáakʼw Hít, Deisheetaan, Sʼiknax̱.ádi y., Shtaxʼhéen Ḵwáan Draft of September Tsu héide shugax̱tutaan, yá yaaḵoosgé daakeit, haa jéexʼ aanáḵ has kawdikʼéetʼ. tsu hé-dé -shu-ga-w-g̱a-tu--tan-h again - .-end---̱-.-[−,,−]-handle- again here toward we will open it yá yaa=ḵu--s-ge- daa-ká-.át haa jée-xʼ ==.-[+,s,−]-know- around--thing . possession- this knowledge container our possession in á-náḵ has=ka-ÿu--di-kʼitʼ-h - =--.-[+,,+]-leave- away from it they left We will open it again, this container of knowledge, that they left behind in our possession. — Kichnáalx̱, George Davis Contents Introduction Dialects and basic phonology Nouns and related issues . Possession ···························· . Case sufixes and postpositions · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .. Ergative sufix ······················ .. Locative sufix ······················ .. Punctual sufix ······················ .. Pertingent sufix ····················· .. Allative sufix ······················ .. Ablative sufix ······················ .. Perlative sufix ······················ .. Adessive sufix ······················ .. Instrumental and comitative sufixes · · · · · · · · · · .. Locative predicate sufix · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .. Similative postposition · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .. Benefactive postposition · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .. Abessive postposition · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in the Morphophonology of Standard Spoken Tamil (Sst): an Optimality Theoretic Study
    TOPICS IN THE MORPHOPHONOLOGY OF STANDARD SPOKEN TAMIL (SST): AN OPTIMALITY THEORETIC STUDY MOHANA DASS RAMASAMY A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSHOPHY SCHOOL OF ENGLISH LITERATURE, LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS UNIVERSTY OF NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE UNITED KINGDOM OCTOBER 2010 Acknowledgements This thesis would not have reached this shape without the contribution of many good souls who have offered their valuable time and invaluable help on many occasions. It is my privilege to register my sincere heartfelt thanks to everyone who has contributed directly and indirectly to the completion of this thesis. First and foremost in the list of generous souls deserving my gratitude is my supervisor, S. J. Hannahs. I am indebted to him for accepting me as his student and introducing me to the study of generative linguistics, especially Optimality Phonology. He has contributed immensely in completing this study. Without his enthusiasm, valuable guidance, constructive comments, moral support, motivation and immense patience, it would have been impossible for me to complete this study. I wish to convey my heartfelt gratitude to him. My sincere thanks are due also to the authorities of the University of Malaya for granting me a scholarship and study leave to conduct this research work successfully. I also owe a great deal of gratitude to my colleagues at my home institution, especially my foster father Professor Dr N Kanthasamy, Head of Department of Indian Studies, Associate Professor Dr S Kumaran, and Associate Professor Dr M Krishanan for their continuous encouragement and moral support which were shown in every possible way. Special thanks also due to them for verifying the collected data and the accuracy of the transcriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fasold R., Connor-Linton J
    0521847680pre_pi-xvi.qxd 1/11/06 3:32 PM Page i sushil Quark11:Desktop Folder: An Introduction to Language and Linguistics This accessible new textbook is the only introduction to linguistics in which each chapter is written by an expert who teaches courses on that topic, ensuring balanced and uniformly excellent coverage of the full range of modern linguistics. Assuming no prior knowledge, the text offers a clear introduction to the traditional topics of structural linguistics (theories of sound, form, meaning, and language change), and in addition provides full coverage of contextual linguistics, including separate chapters on discourse, dialect variation, language and culture, and the politics of language. There are also up-to-date separate chapters on language and the brain, computational linguistics, writing, child language acquisition, and second language learning. The breadth of the textbook makes it ideal for introductory courses on language and linguistics offered by departments of English, sociology, anthropology, and communications, as well as by linguistics departments. RALPH FASOLD is Professor Emeritus and past Chair of the Department of Linguistics at Georgetown University. He is the author of four books and editor or coeditor of six others. Among them are the textbooks The Sociolinguistics of Society (1984) and The Sociolinguistics of Language (1990). JEFF CONNOR-LINTON is an Associate Professor in the Department of Linguistics at Georgetown University, where he has been Head of the Applied Linguistics Program and Department
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Proto-Slavic Palatalisation in Slovene Dialect Morphophonology and the Etymology of [Pik ,Mountain Top’
    Tijmen Pronk UDK 811.163.6'282:81'342.623 Leiden THE SECOND PROTO-SLAVIC PALATALISATION IN SLOVENE DIALECT MORPHOPHONOLOGY AND THE ETYMOLOGY OF [PIK ,MOUNTAIN TOP’ Druga praslovanska regresivna palatalizacija je povzro~ila morfofonolo{ke menjave v slovenski sklanjatvi ter spregatvi. Menjave tipa otrok : otroci najdemovIinMmn.o-jevskih osnov ter v neka- terih velelnikih. V slovenskih nare~jih jo najdemo tudivMed.o-jevskih in a-jevskih osnov ter v pridevni{ki sklanjatvi. ^lanek namerava obravnavati ohranitev in razdelitev omenjenih menjav v slovenskih nare~jih. Zato nudi gradivo iz vseh nare~nih skupin in ga vrednoti. V zvezi s tem bo predlagana nova etimologija besede in toponima {pik. Avtor dokazuje, da je {pik lahko retrogradna tvorba na osnovi neizpri~anega M ed. *{pice, sposojenke iz nem. Spitze ,{pik’. Beseda {pik je izpri~a- na v nare~jih, kjer je druga praslovanska palatalizacija ohranjena v vsaj nekaj o-jevskih osnovah. slovenska nare~ja, regresivna palatalizacija, etimologija, morfofonologija The second Proto-Slavic regressive palatalisation resulted in morpho-phonological alternations in nominal and verbal inflections in Slovene. We find alternation stems of the type otrok : otroci in the nom. and loc.pl. of o-stems and in imperatives. In dialects, it is also attested in the loc.sg. of o- and a-stems and in the adjectival declension. The present article discusses the preservation of these alternations and their distribution in Slovene dialects. Material from all dialect groups is evaluated. In relation to this, a new etymology of the word {pik ,mountain top’is proposed. It is argued that {pik is a back-formation from an unattested loc.sg.
    [Show full text]