The Beetle Tree of Life Reveals That Coleoptera Survived End-Permium Mass Extinction to Diversify During the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution Duane D
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Clemson University TigerPrints Publications Plant and Environmental Sciences 10-2015 The Beetle Tree of Life Reveals that Coleoptera Survived End-Permium Mass Extinction to Diversify During the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution Duane D. McKenna University of Memphis Alexander L. Wild University of Texas at Austin Kojun Kanda University of Arizona Charles L. Bellamy California Department of Food and Agriculture Rolf G. Beutel University of Jena See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/ag_pubs Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Please use the publisher's recommended citation. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/syen.12132/abstract This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Plant and Environmental Sciences at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Duane D. McKenna, Alexander L. Wild, Kojun Kanda, Charles L. Bellamy, Rolf G. Beutel, Michael S. Caterino, Charles W. Farnum, David C. Hawks, Michael A. Ivie, Mary Liz Jameson, Richard A.B. Leschen, Adriana E. Marvaldi, Joseph V. McHugh, Alfred F. Newton, James A. Robertson, Margaret K. Thayer, Michael F. Whiting, John F. Lawrence, Adam Ślipinski, David R. Maddison, and Brian D. Farrell This article is available at TigerPrints: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/ag_pubs/67 Systematic Entomology (2015), 40, 835–880 DOI: 10.1111/syen.12132 The beetle tree of life reveals that Coleoptera survived end-Permian mass extinction to diversify during the Cretaceous terrestrial revolution DUANE D. MCKENNA1,2, ALEXANDER L. WILD3,4, KOJUN , KANDA4,5, CHARLES L. BELLAMY6 †, ROLF G. BEUTEL7, MICHAEL S. CATERINO8, CHARLES W. FARNUM2,DAVIDC. HAWKS9, MICHAEL A. IVIE10, MARY LIZ JAMESON11, RICHARD A. B. LESCHEN12, ADRIANA E. MARVALDI13,14, JOSEPH V. MCHUGH15, ALFRED F. NEWTON16, JAMES A. ROBERTSON4,15, MARGARET K. THAYER16, MICHAEL F. WHITING17, JOHN F. LAWRENCE18,ADAM SLIPI´ NSKI´ 18, DAVID R. MADDISON4,5 and BRIAN D. FARRELL2 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, U.S.A., 2Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A., 3Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, U.S.A., 4Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, U.S.A., 5Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, U.S.A., 6California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, CA, U.S.A., 7Institute of Systematic Zoology and Evolutionary Biology with Phyletic Museum, University of Jena, Jena, Germany, 8School of Agricultural, Forest and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, U.S.A., 9Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA, U.S.A., 10Department of Entomology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, U.S.A., 11Department of Biological Sciences, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, U.S.A., 12Landcare Research, New Zealand Arthropod Collection, Auckland, New Zealand, 13Laboratorio de Entomología, Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de Zonas Áridas, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Mendoza, Argentina, 14División Entomología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 15Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, U.S.A., 16Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, U.S.A., 17Department of Biology and M. L. Bean Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, U.S.A. and 18CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Canberra, Australia Abstract. Here we present a phylogeny of beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) based on DNA sequence data from eight nuclear genes, including six single-copy nuclear protein-coding genes, for 367 species representing 172 of 183 extant families. Our results refine existing knowledge of relationships among major groups ofbee- tles. Strepsiptera was confirmed as sister to Coleoptera and each of the suborders of Coleoptera was recovered as monophyletic. Interrelationships among the subor- ders, namely Polyphaga (Adephaga (Archostemata, Myxophaga)), in our study differ from previous studies. Adephaga comprised two clades corresponding to Hydrade- phaga and Geadephaga. The series and superfamilies of Polyphaga were mostly monophyletic. The traditional Cucujoidea were recovered in three distantly related clades. Lymexyloidea was recovered within Tenebrionoidea. Several of the series and superfamilies of Polyphaga received moderate to maximal clade support in most analyses, for example Buprestoidea, Chrysomeloidea, Coccinelloidea, Cucujiformia, Curculionoidea, Dascilloidea, Elateroidea, Histeroidea and Hydrophiloidea. However, Correspondence: Duane D. McKenna, University of Memphis Department of Biological Sciences, 3700 Walker Avenue, Memphis, TN, USA 38152. E-mail: [email protected] †Deceased on 19 August 2013. The copyright line for this article was changed on 31 July 2015 after original online publication © 2015 The Authors. Systematic Entomology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Entomological Society. 835 This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. 836 D. D. McKenna et al. many of the relationships within Polyphaga lacked compatible resolution under maximum-likelihood and Bayesian inference, and/or lacked consistently strong nodal support. Overall, we recovered slightly younger estimated divergence times than pre- vious studies for most groups of beetles. The ordinal split between Coleoptera and Strepsiptera was estimated to have occurred in the Early Permian. Crown Coleoptera appeared in the Late Permian, and only one or two lineages survived the end-Permian mass extinction, with stem group representatives of all four suborders appearing by the end of the Triassic. The basal split in Polyphaga was estimated to have occurred in the Triassic, with the stem groups of most series and superfamilies originating during the Triassic or Jurassic. Most extant families of beetles were estimated to have Creta- ceous origins. Overall, Coleoptera experienced an increase in diversification rate com- pared to the rest of Neuropteroidea. Furthermore, 10 family-level clades, all in suborder Polyphaga, were identified as having experienced significant increases in diversification rate. These include most beetle species with phytophagous habits, but also several groups not typically or primarily associated with plants. Most of these groups originated in the Cretaceous, which is also when a majority of the most species-rich beetle families first appeared. An additional 12 clades showed evidence for significant decreases in diversi- fication rate. These clades are species-poor in the Modern fauna, but collectively exhibit diverse trophic habits. The apparent success of beetles, as measured by species numbers, may result from their associations with widespread and diverse substrates – especially plants, but also including fungi, wood and leaf litter – but what facilitated these associ- ations in the first place or has allowed these associations to flourish likely varies within and between lineages. Our results provide a uniquely well-resolved temporal and phylo- genetic framework for studying patterns of innovation and diversification in Coleoptera, and a foundation for further sampling and resolution of the beetle tree of life. Introduction boring, soil burrowing and interactions with other invertebrates and plants. Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera; Fig. 1), with >380 000 named liv- The earliest known ancestors of modern beetles are ing species, account for ∼25% of known species on Earth fossil stem group Coleoptera from the Early Permian and ∼40% of insects (Slipi´ nski´ et al., 2011). The number (Artinskian-Kungurian Stages, ∼280 to 270 Ma) belonging of extant species is, however, much higher (e.g. Oberprieler to the extinct suborder Protocoleoptera Crowson (Beckemeyer et al., 2007). Beetles exhibit an astonishing diversity of body & Engel, 2008; Kukalová-Peck & Beutel, 2012; Kirejtshuk sizes, shapes and structures, reflecting an equally diverse range et al., 2013). Proposed crown group representatives of all four of habits. They include some of the smallest and lightest extant suborders of beetles – Adephaga (∼45 500 species; insects (e.g. Ptiliidae: Nanosella Motschulsky, at ∼0.25 mm ground beetles, tiger beetles, predaceous diving beetles, wrin- and ∼0.0005 g) and some of the largest and heaviest (e.g. kled bark beetles, etc.), Archostemata (∼40 species; reticulated Cerambycidae: Macrodontia Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville, at beetles, telephone-pole beetles, etc.), Myxophaga (∼102 max. ∼175 mm, and Scarabaeidae: Goliathus Linnaeus, larvae species; minute bog beetles, skiff beetles, etc.) and Polyphaga max. ∼100 g). Beetles occur in almost all terrestrial ecosys- (∼335 000 species; checkered beetles, click beetles, fireflies, tems and have invaded aquatic habitats at least ten times as lar- ladybird beetles, leaf beetles, long horned beetles, metallic vae, adults or both (e.g. Beutel, 1996; McKenna et al., 2014). wood-boring beetles, rove beetles, scarab beetles, soldier bee- Specialized coevolved habits are the norm, including endo- tles, weevils, etc.) (Slipi´ nski´ et al., 2011)