Another Solution to the Polyhedron in Dürer's Melencolia: a Visual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Another Solution to the Polyhedron in Dürer's Melencolia: a Visual AESTHETICS No.13 (2009) The Japanese Society for Aesthetics / 179 Another Solution to the Polyhedron in Dürer’s Melencolia: A Visual Demonstration of the Delian Problem ISHIZU Hideko Seijo University, Tokyo Introduction The engraving Melencolia (1514) (Fig. 1) by Albrecht Dürer (1471-1528) has been inter- preted in various ways, but is not yet completely solved. It is filled with marvelous instru- ments, and among them a large stone polyhedron in the left center has attracted both art historians and scientists, and the efforts to clarify the significance of the polyhedron have been made by both sides. The preliminary sketch of the polyhedron (Fig. 2), which Dürer drew in perspective, indicating the center of vision by an eye, shows all edges of the polyhedron transparently. And each vertex bears a mark. This polyhedron (Fig. 3) has been regarded as a truncated rhombohedron, which consists of 6 rhombuses. Cut off two corners along the planes perpendicular to the line AH, the solid now consists of 6 irregular pentagons and 2 equilateral triangles. One side of the upper trian- gular face and one side of the bottom triangular face are perpendicular to the picture plane. The engraving is also drawn in perspective. Lines that are perpendicular to the picture plane, such as the side cornice of the building and the arm of the balance, converge at the vanishing point on the horizon of the sea. Dürer set the mirror image of the polyhedron of the sketch in such a manner that the vanishing points and horizons of both planes correspond with each other, so that the polyhedron may be regarded as correct in perspective on the engraving. The polyhedron is so large-sized that it must have some significance, which has been often argued over, and is still in controversy. Art historians were apt to regard intuitively the stone polyhedron as some symbol in the context of their interpretation, for example, as a symbol of geometry, perspective, material, and so on. Meanwhile, scientists attempted to clarify the structure of the polyhedron by determining the acute angle of the rhombus before truncation, that is, the most acute angle of the pentagon. Since Dürer is prominent both as an artist and a geometer, it is necessary to examine this issue from both sides. Examination of Preceding Treatises Preceding treatises dealing with the structure of this polyhedron are listed in Table 1. While some insist that the polyhedron is a truncated cube without any rational grounds [1], the rest are divided into two groups, the one that determined the acute angle to be about 72° and the other about 80° [2]. 180 ISHIZU Hideko Fig. 2: Albrecht Dürer, Drawing, 1514, Pen and brown and black ink, 20.2×19.3 cm, Dresden Landesbibliothek Fig. 1: Albrecht Dürer, Melencolia, 1514, Engraving, 23.9×18.6 cm Fig. 3: Model of the Polyhedron (drafted by Ishizu) Table 1 year name angle method reason / interpretation c.1900 Niemann 80° by use of graphics intended to be a cube 1922 Nagel (90°) enlarged a cube obliquely 1955 Grodzinski 72° making models visually most alike among 60°, 72°, 90° 1957 Richter 79°36’ based on perspective admitted Grodzinski’s as it’s connected with the golden section 1970 Rösch 72° idea 1972 Harnest 80° reconstruction 1976 Wangart 90° by use of graphics 1978 Deckwitz 76° making models as it’s connected with pyramids 1979 Enomoto 72° making models as it’s connected with the golden section 1980 Schröder (81°47’) analysis the ratio between two diagonals is 2: √3 1981 MacGillavry 79° ±1° based on perspective crystal of calcite → mineralogy 1982 Lynch 80~83° making models three-dimensional anamorphosis admitted Richter’s no- 1990 Sixel about 80° tion 1993 Engelhardt 80° calculation crystal of calcite 1999 Schreiber 72° as it’s connected with the golden section Another Solution to the Polyhedron in Dürer’s Melencolia 181 Those who insist on an angle 72° founded their theory on the relation of this angle to equilateral pentagons, and moreover, to the golden section, as a result of looking for a mean- ingful rhombohedron [3]. In 1955, Grodzinski stated that the acute angle of the rhombus was 72° based on making models. He made three models of the truncated rhombohedron with rhombuses having acute angles 60°, 72°, and 90°, ― the angles which seemed somehow sig- nificant. Among them, one with an angle 72° seemed to him to be most appropriate visually. In 1970 approved Rösch this angle, because of its connection with the golden section. In addition, he insisted that several parts of Melencolia were constructed based on the golden section. In 1999, Schreiber stated that Dürer had drawn this polyhedron based on a ground plan and an elevation, and had determined the angle to be 72° as it is connected with the golden section. As stated above, an angle 72° is a very convincing angle which attracts many scientists. On the other hand, the original polyhedron can be reconstructed as it is drawn in per- spective. Derived from reconstruction by use of graphics and calculation, the acute angle of the rhombus, the face of the rhombohedron before truncation, is identified as about 80°. The quadrilateral AEHD in Fig. 3 is parallel to the picture plane, that is, it is similar to the original figure. The sides AD and EH of this parallelogram are projections of the sides of the original rhombus. The sides AE and DH are projections of the longer diagonals of the rhombus. Thus, for example, we can construct the original rhombus, and obtain the acute angle about 80°. At the request of Gielow, Niemann arrived at an angle 80°, although he was sure that Dürer had intended to draw a truncated cube. Then, Richter (1957), Harnest (1972), MacGillavry (c. 1980), Schröder (c. 1980), and Engelhardt (1993) also identified the acute angle as about 80°. Schröder tried to find some significance relating to the ratio between the two diagonals of the rhombus which he set at 2 : √3. In this case, the acute angle can be calcu-lated to be about 82°. Lynch derived an angle 80° by use of both reconstruction and making a model. But 80° cannot cause any important geometric meaning. Lynch insisted that this polyhedron represented a three- dimensional anamorphosis, which appears to be a rhombohedron set on a pentagonal face, and appears to be a cube set on a triangular face. MacGillavry and Engelhardt stated that it represented a crystal of calcite, which does not seem persuasive enough, as there is no reason why calcite should appear so large in the engraving. Schröder and Harnest identified the acute angle to be 80°, while they did not mention further interpretation on it. As stated above, the preceding attempts to determine somehow logically the acute angle of the rhombus, the face of the rhombohedron before truncation, to be 72° or about 80° seem both unsatisfactory. An angle 72° is attractive, while it does not correspond with the result of the analysis, having a large margin of error. And the case is possible only when Dürer lacked the ability to draft. On the other hand, an angle 80°, which was derived from the analysis, on the assumption that he was skilled in drafting, seems to be meaningless. In addition, it should be noted that their arguments are restricted only to geometric area, and that they do not refer to the vague image on the largest pentagonal face of the solid in the engraving which is too noticeable to be ignored. 182 ISHIZU Hideko New Hypothesis Now I set up a new hypothesis, which corresponds with the result of the geometric analysis, is meaningful enough, explains about the patches like a vague figure on the pentago- nal face, and explains also why and how Dürer drew the solid in the engraving in such a way. I’m going to argue below: 1) the solid had been primarily a truncated cube, which Dürer had drawn in perspective, 2) and then he enlarged the drawing vertically in a certain ratio; 3) the enlargement ratio is an approximate solution to the duplication of the cube, or the so-called Delian problem, which originated in ancient Greece. 4) He was interested in this problem and gave the full treatment of it in his book Underweysung der Messung. 5) It was such an important knowledge of geometry that he visualized in his work. 1) Significance of the Vague Figure on the Polyhedron As mentioned above, there are some shadowy patches on the large pentagonal face of the polyhedron in the engraving. That the vague figure represents a skull or a phantom has been often reported [4]. As this shadowy image has been engraved on a hard copper plate, it cannot be a product of chance, like a stain caused by a drop or a rub on a watercolor. It must be meant to represent something especially. In both Dürer’s Knight, Death and Devil (1513) and St. Jerome in His Study (1514), which along with Melencolia are collectively referred to as Dürer’s three master prints, a skull is engraved. So it seems natural to consider that a skull exists in Melencolia, too. However, this skull is not represented in a normal way but as an anamorphic figure. We can recognize a skull when we view the engraving obliquely from the lower side. I drew a skull I found on an obliquely taken photograph of the polyhedron so that you exactly see what I mean (Fig. 4). So large that it completely occupies the pentagonal face. The skull I recognize has similar features to that of his Coat-of-Arms with a Skull (1503) (Fig.5), such as ear holes so dark as eye sockets, a waving hollow over the eyebrows, and two vertical lines carved Fig.
Recommended publications
  • The Conway Space-Filling
    Symmetry: Art and Science Buenos Aires Congress, 2007 THE CONWAY SPACE-FILLING MICHAEL LONGUET-HIGGINS Name: Michael S. Longuet-Higgins, Mathematician and Oceanographer, (b. Lenham, England, 1925). Address: Institute for Nonlinear Science, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037-0402, U.S.A. Email: [email protected] Fields of interest: Fluid dynamics, ocean waves and currents, geophysics, underwater sound, projective geometry, polyhedra, mathematical toys. Awards: Rayleigh Prize for Mathematics, Cambridge University, 1950; Hon.D. Tech., Technical University of Denmark, 1979; Hon. LL.D., University of Glasgow, Scotland, 1979; Fellow of the American Geophysical Union, 1981; Sverdrup Gold Medal of the American Meteorological Society, 1983; International Coastal Engineering Award of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1984; Oceanography Award of the Society for Underwater Technology, 1990; Honorary Fellow of the Acoustical Society of America, 2002. Publications: “Uniform polyhedra” (with H.S.M. Coxeter and J.C.P. Miller (1954). Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 246, 401-450. “Some Mathematical Toys” (film), (1963). British Association Meeting, Aberdeen, Scotland; “Clifford’s chain and its analogues, in relation to the higher polytopes,” (1972). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 330, 443-466. “Inversive properties of the plane n-line, and a symmetric figure of 2x5 points on a quadric,” (1976). J. Lond. Math. Soc. 12, 206-212; Part II (with C.F. Parry) (1979) J. Lond. Math. Soc. 19, 541-560; “Nested triacontahedral shells, or How to grow a quasi-crystal,” (2003) Math. Intelligencer 25, 25-43. Abstract: A remarkable new space-filling, with an unusual symmetry, was recently discovered by John H.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-2011 Newsletter
    Newsletter WILLIAMS G RADUATE PROGRAM IN THE HISTORY OF A RT OFFERED IN COLLABORATION WITH THE CLARK ACADEMIC YEAR 2010–11 Newsletter ••••• 1 1 CLASS OF 1955 MEMORIAL PROFESSOR OF ART MARC GOTLIEB Letter from the Director Greetings from Williamstown! Our New features of the program this past year include an alumni now number well over 400 internship for a Williams graduate student at the High Mu- going back nearly 40 years, and we seum of Art. Many thanks to Michael Shapiro, Philip Verre, hope this newsletter both brings and all the High staff for partnering with us in what promises back memories and informs you to serve as a key plank in our effort to expand opportuni- of our recent efforts to keep the ties for our graduate students in the years to come. We had a thrilling study-trip to Greece last January with the kind program academically healthy and participation of Elizabeth McGowan; coming up we will be indeed second to none. To our substantial community of alumni heading to Paris, Rome, and Naples. An ambitious trajectory we must add the astonishingly rich constellation of art histori- to be sure, and in Rome and Naples in particular we will be ans, conservators, and professionals in related fields that, for a exploring 16th- and 17th-century art—and perhaps some brief period, a summer, or on a permanent basis, make William- sense of Rome from a 19th-century point of view, if I am al- stown and its vicinity their home. The atmosphere we cultivate is lowed to have my way.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainer Schoch How Albrecht Dürer Defined the Modern Artist Type With
    Rainer Schoch How Albrecht Dürer defined the modern artist type with his symbolic image Dürer reflects upon “melancholy” in this masterpiece engraving. This work has the knowledge of dimensions, size, scale and numbers. The always been regarded as one of his most enigmatic and personal pieces. The sheer tools can be categorized into two different spheres: intel- amount of literature built upon this artwork has generated a Babylonian tower of lectualism and craftsmanship. Thus, what at first appeared interpretation on this “Image of Images” (Peter-Klaus as a chaotic jumble of objects, can be interpreted as an Schuster). Erwin Panofsky understood the piece as a, ascending hierarchy in which the intellectual, “artes libe- “spiritual self-portrait of Albrecht Dürer”. rales,” prevails over craft, “artes mechanicae”. Certainly, T he work depicts a winged, matronlike figure, Dürer is addressing one of the core disputes of his time, as sumptuously dressed and crowned with flowers. well as his very own artistic existence. She sits upon the stairs before a wall, pensively According to historians such as Erwin Panofsky, Fritz crouching amid a chaotic jumble of objects and Saxl, and Raymond Klibansky the conceptual and semantic devices that appear to have been abandoned by history of the word melancholy demonstrated a significant chance. Lost in her thoughts, she melancholically change in Dürer’s epoch. Scholars in medieval times belie- rests her head in her hands. She carelessly holds a ved that a surplus of black bile within the body could result Albrecht Dürer: Self-portrait with fur-trimmed compass in her right hand and a book in her lap.
    [Show full text]
  • Albrecht Dürer: “The Apelles of Black Lines”
    Albrecht Dürer: “The Apelles of Black Lines” Background Notes Dr Gillian White - 9 January 2019 Albrecht Dürer, Peasant Couple Dancing, 1514 Copperplate engraving Winchester Art History Group www.wahg.org.uk 1 Albrecht Dürer: “The Apelles of Black Lines” Introduction Towards the end of the fifteenth century there was a revolution in communication. The emergent printing press created a desire for the printed word and in its wake came a growing interest in illustration. At first the simple woodcut was used but, as the market for print grew, the techniques became more sophisticated and publishers included complex engravings with their works. From there it was a simple step to the emergence of the art print, the individual sheet or series to be collected as a work of art in its own right. The print became a major force for the circulation of ideas, whether in association with or independent from the word. Foremost amongst the print artists was Albrecht Dürer (1471-1528), whose works illustrate the restless religious and philosophical world of the early sixteenth century. His prints are some of the most extraordinary and technically proficient ever produced and caused Erasmus to describe the artist as ‘the Apelles of black lines’. Albrecht Dürer Dürer was born in Nuremberg in 1471, the son of a successful goldsmith whose family origins were in Hungary. After basic schooling he was apprenticed to his father but, as he himself put it, was ‘more inclined towards painting’ and his father sent him to the successful workshop of Michael Wolgemut, where the boy could learn a broad range of techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Dürer & Therhinoceros Tanya Desai Except Where Otherwise Noted, This Item’S License Is Described As Attribution- Noncommercial-Noderivatives 4.0 International
    Dürer & therhinoceros tanya desai Except where otherwise noted, this item’s license is described as Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International cover image: Dürer, Albrecht. The Rhinoceros. 1515 Woodcut on laid paper National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C. book design: Vidura Jang Bahadur migration The Migration Stories Chapbook Series, 2019 Drawn from thestories community at and around the University of Chicago Edited by Rachel Cohen and Rachel DeWoskin Dürer& the rhinoceros tanya desai Figure 1. Dürer, Albrecht. The Rhinoceros. 1515. Woodcut on laid paper. National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C. I. India to Portugal, 1515 dreams during storms, until on May 20, 1515, it finally lumbered Twenty years after the opening down the gangplank into the of the sea-route from Lisbon dazzling Portuguese sun—the to Calicut, a rhinoceros was first rhinoceros to discover brought aboard a ship in the Europe. docks of Goa. During the loading of the usual cargo of cinnamon, The animal had been taken from pepper and nutmeg onto the its Indo-Gangetic wallowing ship, the rhinoceros must have grounds to serve as a gift from stood on the deck, the sea-breeze the sultan of Gujarat to the stirring the folds of its skin for the governor of the new Portuguese first time, the sixteenth-century India. The governor had, in turn, horizon expanding before its sent it on this long sea-journey to eyes, till it was taken down to the please the king. Dom Manuel I, hold with the rest of the tradable already in possession of a large goods.
    [Show full text]
  • What Good Would Climbing
    10 ART HISTORY ART HISTORY 11 madness allied to genius to decode the engrav- so solid, “seems weirdly possessed of an inner well as a way clear of the predicament. Poised and the Resurrection, implies a history of the ing. This was developed into a book-length torque, a kinetic potential that makes its planar between extremes, but ready to move in the right world in which the figures depicted and the What good would climbing do? study, still one of the masterpieces of the War- components seem to rotate away from the cen- direction, Melancholy’s narrative “situation” figures gazing at what is depicted form part of burg school: Saturn and Melancholy by Panof- tral axis”, and how “this instability lends the invites and instigates a tempered response in the a whole. In Dürer’s image we are in a timeless sky and his colleagues Raymond Klibansky and form an uncanny ‘agency’ in steering the eye’s beholder, a moderate and modulated speculation present which corresponds to no spot on earth, Therapy, melancholy and Albrecht Dürer Fritz Saxl, which appeared in English in 1964. activity around the composition”. He brings out with the power not only to model, but to restore and to identify with the brooding central figure What all these scholars share, argues Mitchell the complex mathematical echoes set up by the the mind’s creative functioning. would seem more likely to entrap one in one’s Merback in Perfection’s Therapy, his erudite magic square (scholars have even argued that it It is as if, fired by his thesis about the work’s melancholy than to relieve it.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Magic and Alchemy in the Works of Female Surrealist Remedios Varo
    RENAISSANCE MAGIC AND ALCHEMY IN THE WORKS OF FEMALE SURREALIST REMEDIOS VARO ____________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Dominguez Hills ____________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Humanities ____________ by Tammy M. Ngo Fall 2019 THESIS: RENAISSANCE MAGIC AND ALCHEMY IN THE WORKS OF FEMALE SURREALIST REMEDIOS VARO AUTHOR: TAMMY M. NGO APPROVED: ______________________________ Patricia Gamon, Ph.D Thesis Committee Chair ______________________________ Kirstin Ellsworth, Ph.D Committee Member ______________________________ Kimberly Bohman-Kalaja, Ph.D Committee Member Dedicated to Professor Lawrence Klepper ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my advisor Professor Patricia Gamon, Ph.D., Humanities, Art History. In addition, to my family and friends who supported me during my thesis research, thank you. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... IV TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ V LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... VI ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... X 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Mlincoln Thesis Formatted
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: HENDRICK GOLTZIUS’S PROTEAN ICONOGRAPHY: 1582-1590 Matthew David Lincoln, Master of Arts, 2012 Directed By: Professor Arthur K. Wheelock, Jr., Department of Art History and Archaeology Karel van Mander famously characterized Goltzius as a “Proteus or Vertumnus of art”, a turn of phrase that has been taken to refer to his virtuosic skill at engraving in the styles of all the best masters. Often overlooked is the fact that Goltzius also conspicuously exercised his abilities as an iconographer in his early career as a print publisher. Between 1582, when he started his Haarlem print studio, and 1590, when he departed for Italy, Goltzius used classical rhetorical methods to construct innovative compositions. He thus promoted not only his skillful hand, but also his inventive and resourceful mind. This thesis considers Goltzius’s intellectual circles in Haarlem during this critical professional period, presents several case studies of his inventive iconographies, and concludes with two new interpretations of mythological artworks based on the artist’s rarely-acknowledged use of iconographic manuals and emblem books. HENDRICK GOLTZIUS’S PROTEAN ICONOGRAPHY: 1582-1590 By Matthew David Lincoln Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2012 Advisory Committee: Professor Arthur K. Wheelock, Jr., Chair Professor Anthony Colantuono Professor Meredith Gill © Copyright by Matthew David Lincoln 2012 DISCLAIMER The thesis document that follows has had referenced material removed in respect for the owner’s copyright. A complete version of this document, which includes said referenced material, resides in the University of Maryland College Park’s library collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Mini Set 1 Activities
    Mini Set 1 Activities Geometiles® is a product of TM www.geometiles.com Welcome to Geometiles®! Your Mini Set 1 contains 20 equilateral triangles and 12 regular pentagons. This booklet contains some problems and brainteasers for you to try. The puzzles are all at different levels, so there’s something for everyone. Puzzle 1 Make an equilateral triangle that is 1/9 yellow, 1/3 green and 5/9 purple. Now make an equilateral triangle that is 1/4 purple, 1/4 green, 3/16 orange and 5/16 yellow. Notes: In these problems, the student must first realize that he needs 9 and 16 triangles, respectively, to make each figure. (A multiple of 9 or 16 would also work, but this impossible due to the size of the set) Puzzle 2 Make a closed object out of all the 12 pentagons in your box such that any two adjacent tiles have different colors. Puzzle 3 Build a closed solid having 6 rhombic faces Hints: You can make a rhombus by joining two equilateral triangles. Think “stretched out cube”. Just as a cube is made of 6 square faces, with three faces joining at each corner, so too will your solid. The difference is that in your solid, the faces will be rhombic instead of square. Puzzle 4 A solid is strictly convex if a line segment joining any two of its points is entirely contained inside the solid (not on its surface or outside it). Note that a strictly convex solid may not have any coplanar faces. Here are some examples of solids that are NOT strictly convex.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhombohedra Everywhere
    Rhombohedra Everywhere Jen‐chung Chuan [email protected] National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan Abstract A rhombohedron is a 6-face polyhedron in which all faces are rhombi. The cube is the best-known example of the rhombohedron. We intend to show that other less-known rhombohedra are also abundant. We are to show how the rhombohedra appear in the algorithm of rhombic polyhedral dissections, in designing 3D linkages and in supplying concrete examples in mathematics amusement. A tongue-twisting jargon: in case all six rhombic faces are congruent, the rhombohedron is known as a trigonal trapezohedron. 1. Minimum Covering for the Deltoidal Icositetrahedron Why choosing deltoidal icositetrahedron? It is known that every convex polyhedron is the intersection of the half spaces defined by the supporting planes. It is not straightforward to find one such 6n-face polyhedron so the supporting planes enclose n rhombohedra exactly. It turns out that the deltoidal icositetrahedron, having 24 congruent “kites” as its faces, fits such requirement. The coloring scheme below shows the possibility of painting the faces with four colors so each edge-adjacent faces shall receive distinct colors: Figures 1(a) and (b) It turns out that each fixed color, say the blue, occupies exactly three pairs of parallel faces. The six supporting planes enclosed the red-edge rhombohedron. This together with green-, yellow- red- edge rhombohedra cover all faces. The rich symmetries possessed by the deltoidal icositetrahedron enables us to visualize the interplay between the dynamic geometry and combinatorial algorithm. Figure 2 2. Minimum Covering for the Rhombic Icosahedron Unlike the deltoidal icositetrahedron, no choice for any collection of six faces of the rhombic icosahedron can have non-overlapping vertices.
    [Show full text]
  • Durer Melencolia I
    Albrecht Durer Albrecht Durer According to a google cache of http://d.whyville.net/smmk/whytimes/article?id=75: "... Durer was born May 21, 1471, in a small village outside of Nürnberg, Germany. He was the third son of Albrecht Durer and Barbara Holfer. He was one of eighteen children ... His father's family came from Hungary ... the family name was Ajtos which means "door" in Hungarian. When Durer senior and his brothers came to Germany they chose the name Turer which sounds like the German "Tur" meaning door. ... His father ... died in 1502 and Durer was left to care for his sick, and nearly blind, mother. ...". According to an alchemylab web article by John Read: "... Durer (1471-1528) ... was particularly skilled in drawing on the block for the wood-cutter and in engraving on copper with his own unsurpassed hand. In 1513 and 1514 he wrought three engravings on copper that will rank for all time among the world's select masterpieces of this form of art. These were ... "Melencolia" (1514). ... "St. Jerome in his Study" (1514), ... and ... "The Knight " (1513) ...". (images from web museum web pages) Old Dog or Mature Dog Young Dog Newborn Lamb Lion Salamander file:///Phi2Pi/Users/tony/Documents/Durer%20Melencolia%20I/ADurer.html (1 of 23) [11/7/2004 3:22:17 AM] Albrecht Durer MELENCOLIA I (image from an abcgallery web site) file:///Phi2Pi/Users/tony/Documents/Durer%20Melencolia%20I/ADurer.html (2 of 23) [11/7/2004 3:22:17 AM] Albrecht Durer According to an alchemylab web article by John Read: "..
    [Show full text]
  • Albrecht Dürer: the Search for the Beautiful in a Time of Trials by Bonnie James
    Click here for Full Issue of Fidelio Volume 14, Number 3, Fall 2005 ART Albrecht Dürer: The Search for the Beautiful In a Time of Trials by Bonnie James the Inquisition, Reuchlin had been with works including the Talmud and the inspired by the fresh winds blowing mystical Kabbala, soon lead him into con- from south of the Alps in Renais- flict with the Inquisition, its Inquisitor sance Italy. He was associated with General Jacob Hochstraten, and his fanati- the networks of the religious reform cal acolyte, Pfefferkorn. movement, the Brothers of the Com- When defending himself for having mon Life, whose commitment he found errors in the Vulgate of Jerome, shared to discovering the truth from Reuchlin declared, “Though I honor Jerome original sources. He had travelled to as a holy angel . .Ihonor truth more.” Italy several times, including to Flo- In arguing against burning the Jewish rence, where he spent time studying books, Reuchlin ridiculed those who issued Blauel/Gnamm—ARTOTHEK at the Platonic Academy with Mar- the order without being able to read the Albrecht Dürer, “Self-Portrait as Christ,” 1500. silio Ficino, Pico della Mirandola, works they condemned: “If someone wished and others. It was the passionate to write against the mathematicians, and belief of these intellectuals that were himself ignorant in simple arithmetic Foreword: knowledge, especially of the Classics, must or mathematics, he would be made a The Reuchlin Affair be open to all. laughingstock,” he wrote in the “Recom- Moreover, as Christians, their commit- mendation.” He said that, if some were The year was 1510.
    [Show full text]