DOCSLIB.ORG

Review Of" the Dutch Gentry, 1500-1650: Family, Faith, And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review Of Swarthmore College Works History Faculty Works History 1-1-1988 Review Of "The Dutch Gentry, 1500-1650: Family, Faith, And Fortune" By S. D. Marshall Robert S. DuPlessis Swarthmore College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-history Part of the History Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation Robert S. DuPlessis. (1988). "Review Of "The Dutch Gentry, 1500-1650: Family, Faith, And Fortune" By S. D. Marshall". American Journal Of Sociology. Volume 93, Issue 4. 993-995. DOI: 10.1086/228845 https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-history/246 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Review Author(s): Robert S. DuPlessis Review by: Robert S. DuPlessis Source: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 93, No. 4 (Jan., 1988), pp. 993-995 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780624 Accessed: 11-06-2015 19:37 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Journal of Sociology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 130.58.65.13 on Thu, 11 Jun 2015 19:37:04 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Book Reviews not the whole story.The problematicrelationship between rules and practicesis notaddressed here or even alluded to, and so we mustalways keep in mind the limitednature of Wolfram'sproject as well as the evidenceshe uses in herconsideration of Englishkinship. We learnmuch about kinshiprules but littleabout how theywere followedor whether theywere followedor who followedthem. The Dutch Gentry,1500-1650: Family,Faith, and Fortune.By Sherrin D. Marshall. Westport,Conn.: GreenwoodPress, 1987. Pp. xxvii+225. $35.00. RobertS. DuPlessis SwarthmoreCollege Despite general agreementabout the nobility'scentrality to the Dutch Revolt, historiansof the early modernNetherlands have slightedthe landed elites. This has probablybeen because the Revolt issued in a bourgeoissociety, study of urban classes has been privileged,and even researchin ruralhistory has attendedmore to the peasantrythan to the aristocracy. Not every neglectedsubject meritsinvestigation, of course, but the considerablelight thrown on otherEuropean societiesby studiesof their nobilitiessuggests the potentialrewards of similarresearch in the Low Countries.Sherrin Marshall's book The Dutch Gentry,1500-1650, en- compassesthree generations of the lessernobility, chiefly in the province of Utrecht,but also includingeveryone married to Utrechters:substantial minoritiesof men and womenfrom adjacent Holland and Gelderland;a sprinklingfrom elsewhere in the Netherlandsand abroad; and some ur- ban patricians.Socially and economicallyanalogous to theEnglish strata fromwhich theirname is borrowed,as membersof the legallydefined nobility,the Dutch gentrydiffered juridically from their commoner counterpartsin Britain.Yet, despitethis status, their political arena was the provincialassembly rather than a nationalparliament. Contendingthat the familyconstituted the principaldeterminant of gentrybehavior, Marshall examinesthe life course and dailyexistence of the class throughthe lens of family.In contrastto scholarswho consider the lineage the primaryemotional, financial, and politicalnexus forthe secondestate, she arguesfor the equal materialand affectivesignificance of what she termsthe "core familyunit," a multigenerationalfamily groupcomprising two sets of grandparents,one set of parents,and the latter'schildren. The firsthalf of the book is informedby scholarshipand debates in familyhistory. The Utrechtgentry, Marshall finds,conformed to the typicalEuropean patternof late marriageand a significantproportion of celibates.On questionsof interpretation,she generallyconcurs with an emergingrevisionist account that modifies the views putforth by scholars 993 This content downloaded from 130.58.65.13 on Thu, 11 Jun 2015 19:37:04 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions AmericanJournal of Sociology like PhilippeAries, Lawrence Stone, and Edward Shorter.If thesegentry are any indication,the early modern family, for all itsundoubted patriar- chal structure,was characterizedby close and lovingparent-child rela- tionships,respect for individuals'wishes, and a balance betweencore familyimperatives and responsibilityto the lineage. Addressingissues in cultural,social, and political history,the final threechapters find that continuity marked the lives of thegentry across a tumultuouscentury and a half.The religionof thegentry remained prac- tical,Erasmian, and politique. Eschewingthe alleged extravagance of its superiors,converting properties to shorterleases, and obtaininggovern- mentaljobs, the majorityheld its own across the long,inflationary 16th century.Though the Revolt enforcedsome geographicmobility, several decades of delayedmarriage, and fewerchildren, only rarely were gentry familiesdecimated or impoverished,property remained substantially in thesame hands,and, in thenew republicanregime, gentry filled the same kindsof positionsas before. Echoing views already currenton the 17thcentury, Marshall insists thata value consensusobtained across classes in the Netherlands,as the principleof reciprocity moderated hierarchic postulates. This observation capturesaspects of Dutch mentality,but the authorascribes too muchto reciprocalvalues, underplayingthe significanceof deferenceand hierar- chy in feudal, patron-client,republican, and personal relations.Simi- larly, while the idea of the core familyunit is a welcome attemptto conceptualizethe links betweennuclear familyand lineage,in factnu- clear familiesreceive the bulk of Marshall's attention-to the neglectof the core's elder generationand the lineage. Though the book contains interestinginformation about widows and widowers,including gender- specificrates of remarriage and acceptedbastardy, overall, this important topicis treatedtoo brieflyand diffusely.And despiteMarshall's recurrent citationof the issue, the situationof women getsabsorbed (once again!) intothat of the family. The Dutch Gentryemploys archival and printedsources as well as literaryevidence. Acknowledgingthat the lattermaterial may not be statisticallytypical, Marshall maintainsthat it neverthelessprovides use- fulinsights into attitudes. One can sympathizewith this position yet wish thatthe author had furtherexplored the ambiguities of prescriptive litera- ture and exiguoussources, since her conclusionsabout such mattersas reciprocity,women's autonomy, and religioussentiments depend heavily on them. The book incorporatesnumerous figures and tables, not all carryingequal convictionor fascination.Photographed apparently di- rectlyfrom computer printout, the figuresare, at times,insufficiently distinct.Regrettably, the materialpresented visually is all too oftendis- cussedin a verysummary or incompletemanner (see, e.g., tables3.2 and 3.3.) Because the gentryshared status, landholding patterns, governmental activities,and oftenlevel ofwealth with the greater nobility, and because bothstrata sat togetherin the provincialstates, focus on the gentrymay 994 This content downloaded from 130.58.65.13 on Thu, 11 Jun 2015 19:37:04 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Book Reviews proveunduly restrictive. In any event,conclusions about the aristocracy based on Utrechtare likelyto need modificationbefore being applied to the southernprovinces (present-day Belgium), in whichthe highernobil- ity were more numerous,wealthy, and influential,and in which the courseof earlymodern history diverged notably even beforethe Revolt. Whetherthey will prove valid for the rest of the modernNetherlands remainsto be seen: work in progresson the nobilityof Holland will facilitatecomparisons with the situationin the dominantnorthern prov- ince. Whateverthe resultsof otherinquiries, however, Marshall's case studyfurnishes much empirical material and manysuggestions to ponder for national or internationalsyntheses of the historyof early modern landed elites. The Decline ofFertility in Europe. Edited by AnsleyJ. Coale and Susan Cotts Watkins. Princeton,N.J.: PrincetonUniversity Press, 1986. Pp. xxii+484. $55.00 (cloth);$14.50 (paper). AntonioMcDaniel Universityof Chicago The Decline of Fertilityin Europe representsthe culminationof the PrincetonEuropean FertilityProject, which began in 1963. In theirsum- maryarticle, Ansley J. Coale and Roy Treadway describethe principal purposesof theproject: "to createa detailedquantitative record of fertil- ityin each of the severalhundred provinces of Europe duringthe period of major decline, and to determinethe social and economicconditions that prevailed when the modernreduction in the rate of childbearing began" (p. 32). Indeed, the quantitativeinformation alone is a great contributionto our understandingof European social history,and the attemptsto
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JWOS Vol 10.Indd
    12 “To Free-Town, Our Common Judgement Place”: Commoners in Romeo and Juliet Barbara Mather Cobb Murray State University lthough the bulk of Shakespeare’s plays open with characters of the noble class on stage, fi ve open with commoners. A In each case, the commoner characters direct our gaze and focus our attention on the issue at hand. The device is used frequently throughout Shakespeare’s canon: the commoner character is presented matter-of-factly and sympathetically, with little affect and sometimes with little development, and thus serves a similar role to that of the Chorus in a Sophocles play, leading a commoner audience member to recognize the nature of the confl ict in the play at hand. In Coriolanus we meet an angry crowd, Citizens who are starving and who blame Caius Martius, who will become Coriolanus, for their condition. Although some scholars argue for an ambivalent audience response to this protagonist, using evidence from points later in the play, a commoner audience member would be attuned to his fl aw, his culpability, his propensity toward ego and selfi shness because they identify with the commoners who describe him this way in this fi rst interaction with these characters. Timon of Athens and Julius Caesar both begin with tradesmen: in Timon, a Poet, Painter, Jeweler, and Mercer comment on Fortune and on those whom Fortune favors, like Timon, already precursing his fall as Fortune’s wheel turns; in Julius Caesar, a Carpenter and Cobbler celebrate Caesar, prepossessing the audience toward compassion for the leader besieged by other leaders envious of his power and popularity.
    [Show full text]
  • William Jennings Bryan and His Opposition to American Imperialism in the Commoner
    The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner by Dante Joseph Basista Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the History Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY August, 2019 The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner Dante Joseph Basista I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: Dante Basista, Student Date Approvals: Dr. David Simonelli, Thesis Advisor Date Dr. Martha Pallante, Committee Member Date Dr. Donna DeBlasio, Committee Member Date Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Dean of Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT This is a study of the correspondence and published writings of three-time Democratic Presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan in relation to his role in the anti-imperialist movement that opposed the US acquisition of the Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico following the Spanish-American War. Historians have disagreed over whether Bryan was genuine in his opposition to an American empire in the 1900 presidential election and have overlooked the period following the election in which Bryan’s editorials opposing imperialism were a major part of his weekly newspaper, The Commoner. The argument is made that Bryan was authentic in his opposition to imperialism in the 1900 presidential election, as proven by his attention to the issue in the two years following his election loss.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commoner Issue 13 Winter 2008-2009
    In the beginning there is the doing, the social flow of human interaction and creativity, and the doing is imprisoned by the deed, and the deed wants to dominate the doing and life, and the doing is turned into work, and people into things. Thus the world is crazy, and revolts are also practices of hope. This journal is about living in a world in which the doing is separated from the deed, in which this separation is extended in an increasing numbers of spheres of life, in which the revolt about this separation is ubiquitous. It is not easy to keep deed and doing separated. Struggles are everywhere, because everywhere is the realm of the commoner, and the commoners have just a simple idea in mind: end the enclosures, end the separation between the deeds and the doers, the means of existence must be free for all! The Commoner Issue 13 Winter 2008-2009 Editor: Kolya Abramsky and Massimo De Angelis Print Design: James Lindenschmidt Cover Design: [email protected] Web Design: [email protected] www.thecommoner.org visit the editor's blog: www.thecommoner.org/blog Table Of Contents Introduction: Energy Crisis (Among Others) Is In The Air 1 Kolya Abramsky and Massimo De Angelis Fossil Fuels, Capitalism, And Class Struggle 15 Tom Keefer Energy And Labor In The World-Economy 23 Kolya Abramsky Open Letter On Climate Change: “Save The Planet From 45 Capitalism” Evo Morales A Discourse On Prophetic Method: Oil Crises And Political 53 Economy, Past And Future George Caffentzis Iraqi Oil Workers Movements: Spaces Of Transformation 73 And Transition
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rome Notes.Pptx.Pdf
    Ancient Rome Notes Geography ● Located on peninsula in southern Europe thus creating a sea-faring traders. ● Shaped like a high-heeled boot extending into the Mediterranean Sea. ● Two major mountain ranges, the Alps in the north and the Apennines in the south. Geography ● Hilly, rugged land with several volcanoes such as Mt. Vesuvius. ● Some fertile flatland can be found. ● Mild climate makes it excellent for farming grains, grapes, olives, and citrus fruits. ● Tiber River is one of several rivers that provided fresh water. Economy ● Surplus of crops such as grains and oils enabled growth of Rome. ● Sea traders traveled to Greece, Spain, northern Africa, and kingdoms of Asia. Economy ● Merchants sold meats, vegetables, cloth, sandals and pottery as well as books on Egyptian papyrus. Achievements ● Constructed roads of long lasting materials to withstand traffic and exposure to weather which connected large areas of the country. ● Created aqueducts or channels that carried fresh water from the mountains to the cities. ● Used concrete, a mixture of sand or gravel and cement as a building material. Achievements ● To support the roof they created a vault; a series of arches. ● Sought knowledge in order to improve their lives. ● The story of the Trojan War hero, Aeneas, tells how Ancient Rome was formed with a group of people called the Latins. Social classes ● Strong belief in such values as justice, honesty, valor, and loyalty. ● Society was divided into Rich Ancient Romans two groups: patricians, (wealthy leaders) and plebeians (the common people). Commoner Ancient Romans Social classes ● Slaves were common and those that were educated often held highly skilled professions such as teachers and doctors.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery, Surplus, and Stratification on the Northwest Coast: the Ethnoenergetics of an Incipient Stratification System
    Slavery, Surplus, and Stratification on the Northwest Coast: The Ethnoenergetics of an Incipient Stratification System Eugene E. Ruyle Current Anthropology, Vol. 14, No. 5. (Dec., 1973), pp. 603-63 1. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=OO1 1-3204%28 1973 12%29 14%3A5%3C603%3ASSASOT%3E2.O.CO%3B2-S Current Anthropology is currently published by The University of Chicago Press. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR' s Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR' s Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of scholarly journals. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org/ SatJul22 17:49:41 2006 CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY Vol. 14, No. 5, December 1973 © 1973 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Slavery, Surplus, and Stratification on the Northwest Coast: The Ethnoenergetics of an Incipient Stratification Systeml by Eugene E.
    [Show full text]
  • I Geography A
    New Dorp High School Social Studies Department AP Global Mr. Hubbs Aim: How did Rome establish a Republic? I Geography a. Located on a peninsula b. 3 surrounding islands c. located near the Tiber River built on 7 hills for protection d. It was also a strategic location, center of trade and commerce II Early Civilizations 1. 1500–1000 BCE Indo-Europeans migrate to Rome (spoke Latin) 2. 800-500 BCE Greeks and Etruscans migrate to Italy 3. Etruscans turned Rome into a city 4. Greek culture blended into Rome 5. art, architecture, literature, alphabet, olives and grapes all transferred to Rome 6. 509 BCE Romans drive out foreigners, begin independent rule III Republic a. Landowners and aristocrats had the power b. 300 man senate was center of gov’t c. Senators were patricians (a member of one of the original citizen families of ancient Rome) d. 2 Consuls elected annually (they are chief civil and military magistrates) e. Tribune charged with protection of lives and property of plebeians (commoner) IV Social Class a. Patricians- aristocrats, landowners, senators, MOST POWER b. Plebeians- common people -Little say in gov’t, no intermarriage -Had their own assembly V Law Code a. 451 Twelve Tables were a system of laws that were created to organize prosecution for crimes and trials b. Also used to protect plebeians from abusive patricians c. Use of judges VI Military a. Romans skilled in battle and allies can become citizens b. Superior discipline, high values, courage c. Phalanx was used d. Roman Legion 3000-6000 men This work is the intellectual property of MrHubbshistory.com.
    [Show full text]
  • World History--Part 1. Teacher's Guide [And Student Guide]
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 462 784 EC 308 847 AUTHOR Schaap, Eileen, Ed.; Fresen, Sue, Ed. TITLE World History--Part 1. Teacher's Guide [and Student Guide]. Parallel Alternative Strategies for Students (PASS). INSTITUTION Leon County Schools, Tallahassee, FL. Exceptibnal Student Education. SPONS AGENCY Florida State Dept. of Education, Tallahassee. Bureau of Instructional Support and Community Services. PUB DATE 2000-00-00 NOTE 841p.; Course No. 2109310. Part of the Curriculum Improvement Project funded under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B. AVAILABLE FROM Florida State Dept. of Education, Div. of Public Schools and Community Education, Bureau of Instructional Support and Community Services, Turlington Bldg., Room 628, 325 West Gaines St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-0400. Tel: 850-488-1879; Fax: 850-487-2679; e-mail: cicbisca.mail.doe.state.fl.us; Web site: http://www.leon.k12.fl.us/public/pass. PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom - Learner (051) Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF05/PC34 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Academic Accommodations (Disabilities); *Academic Standards; Curriculum; *Disabilities; Educational Strategies; Enrichment Activities; European History; Greek Civilization; Inclusive Schools; Instructional Materials; Latin American History; Non Western Civilization; Secondary Education; Social Studies; Teaching Guides; *Teaching Methods; Textbooks; Units of Study; World Affairs; *World History IDENTIFIERS *Florida ABSTRACT This teacher's guide and student guide unit contains supplemental readings, activities,
    [Show full text]
  • Marxist Historians and the Question of Class in the French Revolution Author(S): Jack Amariglio and Bruce Norton Source: History and Theory , Feb., 1991, Vol
    Marxist Historians and the Question of Class in the French Revolution Author(s): Jack Amariglio and Bruce Norton Source: History and Theory , Feb., 1991, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Feb., 1991), pp. 37-55 Published by: Wiley for Wesleyan University Stable URL: http://www.jstor.com/stable/2505290 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.com/stable/2505290?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms and Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to History and Theory This content downloaded from 103.77.40.126 on Wed, 09 Sep 2020 04:31:25 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms MARXIST HISTORIANS AND THE QUESTION OF CLASS IN THE FRENCH REVOLUTION JACK AMARIGLIO and BRUCE NORTON In a recent book about Marxist scholarship on the French Revolution, George Comninel notes that in perhaps no other area of historical research has Marxian theory been so dominant among Western scholars. 1 A long line of Marxist and Marx-indebted historians have presented the Revolution as a moment in which the confluence and conflagration of class forces produced a dramatic transfor- mation in Western societies, encompassing sweeping changes in economics, pol- itics, ideology, and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernity, Cosmopolitanism, and the Emergence of Middle Classes in Tonga
    Modernity, Cosmopolitanism, and the Emergence of Middle Classes in Tonga Niko Besnier “The Embarrassment of the Middle Classes” A recurrent issue in our understanding of the transformations experienced by Pacifi c Island societies, and societies of the developing world in gen- eral, is the extent to which traditional social arrangements (eg, rank-based systems, inequalities predicated on colonialism, or local forms of egalitari- anism) are being displaced by social-class structures. A focus on these his- torical transformations demands that we address what constitutes a social class—an almost unsolvable problem, but nevertheless one for which we are fortunate to have a distinguished intellectual genealogy. The work of two of the founding fathers of modern-day social science, Karl Marx and Max Weber, can be understood as lifelong projects to understand social inequality in the West in terms of social-class stratifi cation. Yet, as social scientists, we continue to have diffi culties apprehending social class, par- ticularly in contexts that are not traditionally viewed as the locus of class hierarchies. This article seeks to address these diffi culties in the context of one Pacifi c Island society, Tonga. The problem is particularly acute when one deals with the middle classes, as opposed to the working or elite classes—those who are betwixt- and-between, caught in a liminal position that, like other forms of liminal- ity, are supposed to go one way or another, while in fact they remain in suspension. This suspension is particularly pertinent to the “middleness” of the middle classes and renders their very nature unstable, in contrast to the solidity that Marx attributed to both the proletariat and the bour- geoisie, groups whose self-consciousness is fi rmly ingrained in their identi- ties, and who theoretically have little trouble fi nding a common “enemy” The Contemporary Pacific, Volume 21, Number 2, 215–262 © 2009 by University of Hawai‘i Press 215 216 the contemporary pacifi c • 21:2 (2009) whose interests are opposed to their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery in the Roman Economy
    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics Slavery in the Roman economy Version 1.0 September 2010 Walter Scheidel Stanford University Abstract: This paper discusses the location of slavery in the Roman economy. It deals with the size and distribution of the slave population and the economics of slave labor and offers a chronological sketch of the development of Roman slavery. © Walter Scheidel. [email protected] Building on Greek and Hellenistic institutions, ancient Rome created the largest slave society in history. 1 There are several reasons for defining the Roman Empire as a slave society, above all in its Italian core but also to varying degrees in its subject territories. Slaves, numbering in the millions and widely dispersed, accounted for a non-trivial share of its total population. In key areas, slaves were not merely present but supported what has been termed a ‘slave mode of production,’ a mode that rested both on an integrated system of enslavement, slave trade, and slave employment in production, and on “the systematic subjection of slaves to the control of their masters in the process of production and reproduction.” 2 Most importantly, Rome counts as a slave society in terms of the structural location of slavery: dominant groups, once again above all at the core, relied to a significant degree of slave labor to generate surplus and maintain their position of dominance. 3 Since the role of slavery in central productive processes turned Rome into a ‘slave economy’ just as the widespread domination of slaves as a primary social relationship made it a ‘slave society,’ these two terms may be used interchangeably, especially in those strata where slaves and ex-slaves continuously enveloped owners and patrons and mediated their interaction with the freeborn population.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Social Classes, Profession and Colour in the Indo- European Societies and Ancient Persia
    Journal of Anthropology and Archaeology June 2014, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 109-127 ISSN: 2334-2420 (Print), 2334-2439 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development The Origin of Social Classes, Profession and Colour in the Indo- European Societies and Ancient Persia Dr. Behzad Moeini Sam1 and Babak Aryanpour2 Abstract The ancient Persian society was traditionally divided into three or four different classes. Experts believe that this shared legacy went back to the Indo-European periods with its foot print, in turn, traceable in the Indo-European societies’ belief system. The important question, however, is whether these classifications were the results of such religious beliefs and their gods, or attributable to some other social factors. What role did the colours play in this classification? The Sasanian period constitutes the cardinal source of our information. We are, however, trying to find out: The origins of this classification, The nature of influence, and the role that, the element of colour played in this classification, Whether such classification was identical and uniform amongst all ancient Persian dynasties. Keyword:Ancient Iran, Colour, Class, Indo-European, Profession Introduction Some scholars study an individual’s social standings both vertically and horizontally.Vertically speaking, a person is positioned within the family, clan or tribal unit. 1 Assistan Professor at History, Azad University of Najaf Abad, Isafahan, Iran 2 PhD Candidate at History, Azad University of Najaf Abad, Isafahan, Iran 110 Journal of Anthropology and Archaeology, Vol. 2(1), June 2014 An individual can also be studied from a horizontal point of view which is the person’s work, profession and production.
    [Show full text]
  • Material Expressions of Wealth and Social Class at Aztec-Period Sites in Morelos, Mexico
    Ancient Mesoamerica, 27 (2016), 133–147 Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2016 doi:10.1017/S0956536115000334 MATERIAL EXPRESSIONS OF WEALTH AND SOCIAL CLASS AT AZTEC-PERIOD SITES IN MORELOS, MEXICO Jan Marie Olsona and Michael E. Smithb aEdmonton, Alberta bSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 872402, Tempe, Arizona 85287-2402 Abstract We analyze residential architecture and domestic artifacts as expressions of wealth, prestige, and social class at three Aztec-period settlements in Morelos, Mexico: Capilco, Cuexcomate, and Yautepec. House size, as expressed in both floor area and construction volume, shows a strongly bimodal distribution that we interpret as marking elite and commoner residences. We test this interpretation with two artifactual indices of household wealth. One is designed to maximize the elite-commoner distinction in each setting, but is not directly comparable among contexts. The other is a simpler generic wealth index that can be compared among sites and across time. We also consider variability within the commoner class in house size and artifact inventories. While some degree of variation is present, the extent of variation is minor in comparison to the level of elite-commoner differences. INTRODUCTION Although these authors do not provide citations for the “many ar- chaeologists” or their findings, they go on to suggest that: Was there a major gulf in standards of living between Aztec nobles and commoners? The luxuriant lifestyles and great wealth of kings and high nobles, as described in many ethnohistoric documents, “when archaeologists examine the material record, the variation contrast greatly with the modest economic situation of peasants seems to be distributed along a continuum of quantity and and urban commoners as suggested by archaeological excavations quality, suggesting the existence of a continuum of social differ- of houses.
    [Show full text]