Functions of the Nervous System Master Controlling and Communicating System of Body 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Functions of the Nervous System Master Controlling and Communicating System of Body 1 2/27/2019 Nervous Tissue and Neuron Function Fundamentals Of The Nervous System And Nervous Tissue Learn and Understand 1. Like muscle cells, neurons use membrane polarity upset (AP) as a signal therefore keeping their membranes constantly ready (RMP). 2. Neuroglia help create and maintain the environmental conditions necessary for optimal neuron functioning. 3. In order to carry their message, some neurons have axons greater than 1 m in length. 4. Increasing the frequency of action potentials, not its strength, is how the NS controls the intensity of its message. 5. Graded potentials may sum to threshold depolarization causing AP in the neuron. The source of graded potentials is the up to 10,000 synapses with other neurons. Functions of the Nervous System Master controlling and communicating system of body 1. Sensory: Receiving internal and external sensory input. 2. Integration: Process and evaluate, coordinate and control response 3. Motor: Generate response signals A. Controlling muscles and glands B. Maintaining homeostasis Rapid and specific - usually causes almost immediate responses Establishing and maintaining mental activity, consciousness, thinking, behavior, memory, emotion 1 2/27/2019 Figure 11.1 The nervous system’s functions. Sensory input Integration Motor output Anatomic Divisions of the Nervous System 100 Billion Neurons PNS: Consists mainly of nerves that extend from brain and spinal cord. 100 Million Neurons Cranial nerves to CNS: Integration and and from brain. control center. Spinal nerves to and Interprets sensory from spinal cord. input and dictates motor output Plexus – network of sensory input, motor output and integration outside of the CNS Figure 11.2 Levels of organization in the nervous system. Central nervous system (CNS) Peripheral nervous system (PNS) Brain and spinal cord Cranial nerves and spinal nerves Integrative and control centers Communication lines between the CNS and the rest of the body Sensory (afferent) division Motor (efferent) division Somatic and visceral sensory Motor nerve fibers nerve fibers Conducts impulses from the CNS Conducts impulses from to effectors (muscles and glands) receptors to the CNS Somatic nervous Autonomic nervous Somatic sensory fiber Skin system system (ANS) Somatic motor Visceral motor (voluntary) (involuntary) Conducts impulses Conducts impulses from the CNS to from the CNS to skeletal muscles cardiac muscles, smooth muscles, Visceral sensory fiber Stomach and glands Skeletal muscle Motor fiber of somatic nervous system Sympathetic division Parasympathetic Mobilizes body systems division during activity Conserves energy Promotes house- keeping functions during rest Sympathetic motor fiber of ANS Heart Structure Function Sensory (afferent) division of PNS Parasympathetic motor fiber of ANS Bladder Motor (efferent) division of PNS 2 2/27/2019 Histology of Nervous Tissue • Highly cellular; little extracellular space • Two principal cell types – Neurons (nerve cells)—excitable cells that transmit electrical signals – Neuroglia – small cells that surround and wrap delicate neurons • CNS: – Astrocytes – Microglial cells – Ependymal cells – Oligodendrocytes • Satellite cells (PNS) • Schwann cells (PNS) Neurons • Structural units of nervous system • Large, highly specialized cells that conduct impulses • Extreme longevity (100 years or more) • Amitotic—with few exceptions • High metabolic rate—requires continuous supply of oxygen and glucose • All have cell body and one or more processes Dendrites (receptive Soma = regions) Biosynthetic center of neuron Cell body (biosynthetic center Synthesizes proteins, membranes, and receptive region) and other chemicals Rough ER (chromatophilic substance or Nissl bodies) Most active and best developed in body Most neuron cell bodies in CNS Nuclei are clusters of neuron cell bodies in CNS Nucleus Dendrites Convey incoming messages toward cell body as graded potentials Axon (impulse- Myelin sheath gap Impulse Nucleolus generating (node of Ranvier) direction Chromatophilic and -conducting substance (rough region) Axon endoplasmic terminals reticulum) Schwann cell (secretory region) Axon hillock Terminal branches 3 2/27/2019 Structure of a Motor Neuron The Axon: Structure • One axon per cell arising from axon hillock – Cone-shaped area of cell body • In some, axon short or absent, in others most of length of cell • Long axons called nerve fibers • Occasional branches (axon collaterals) • Branches profusely at end (terminus) – Can be 10,000 terminal branches • Distal endings called axon terminals or terminal boutons, axon bulbs, presynaptic terminals The Axon: Functional Characteristics • Generates and conducts AP • Transmits AP along axolemma to axon terminal Neurotransmitters released into extracellular space • Synapsed with many other neurons at same time • Lacks rough ER and Golgi apparatus – Relies on cell body to renew proteins and membranes • Quickly decay if cut or damaged 4 2/27/2019 Schwann cell plasma Segmented sheath membrane 1 around most long or Schwann cell cytoplasm large-diameter axons Axon Myelinated fibers Schwann cell nucleus Function of myelin Protects and electrically 2 insulates axon Increases speed of nerve impulse transmission Nonmyelinated fibers conduct impulses more 3 slowly Myelin sheath Figure 11.5a Nerve fiber myelination by Schwann cells in the PNS. Schwann cell cytoplasm Myelination of a nerve fiber (axon) Figure 11.5b Nerve fiber myelination by Schwann cells in the PNS. Myelin sheath Outer collar of perinuclear cytoplasm Axon (of Schwann cell) Cross-sectional view of a myelinated axon (electron micrograph 24,000x) 5 2/27/2019 Functional Classifications: Sensory Transmit impulses from sensory receptors toward CNS Cell bodies in ganglia in PNS – ganglion is a grouping of NCBs outside of the CNS Motor Carry impulses from CNS to effectors Most cell bodies in CNS (except some autonomic neurons) Interneuron (association neuron) Lie between motor and sensory neurons Shuttle signals through CNS pathways; most are entirely within CNS 99% of body's neurons Functional Classification of Neurons • Sensory – Transmit impulses from sensory receptors toward CNS – Almost all are Unipolar – Cell bodies in ganglia in PNS – ganglion is a grouping of NCBs outside of the CNS • Motor – Carry impulses from CNS to effectors – Multipolar – Most cell bodies in CNS (except some autonomic neurons) • Interneurons (association neurons) – Lie between motor and sensory neurons – Shuttle signals through CNS pathways; most are entirely within CNS – 99% of body's neurons 6 2/27/2019 The Resting Membrane Potential • Potential difference across membrane of resting cell – Approximately –70 mV in neurons • Actual voltage difference varies from -40 mV to -90 mV – Membrane termed polarized • Generated by: – Differences in ionic makeup of ICF and ECF • ECF has higher concentration of Na+ than ICF – Balanced chiefly by chloride ions (Cl-) • ICF has higher concentration of K+ than ECF – Balanced by negatively charged proteins • K+ plays most important role in membrane potential – Differential permeability of the plasma membrane Measuring Membrane Potential in Neurons Figure 11.6 Operation of gated channels. Open and close to change which ions move across membrane and when. One stimulated by messenger; one stimulated by electrical charge Chemically gated ion channels Voltage-gated ion channels Open in response to binding of the Open in response to changes appropriate neurotransmitter in membrane potential Receptor Neurotransmitter chemical attached to receptor Membrane Chemical voltage binds changes Closed Open Closed Open Each Na+ channel has two voltage-sensitive gates • Activation gates • Closed at rest; open with depolarization allowing Na+ to enter cell • Inactivation gates • Open at rest; block channel once it is open to prevent more Na+ from entering cell 7 2/27/2019 Differences in Plasma Membrane Permeability • Impermeable to large anionic proteins • Slightly permeable to Na+ (through leakage channels) – Sodium diffuses into cell down concentration gradient • 25 times more permeable to K+ than sodium (more leakage channels) – Potassium diffuses out of cell down concentration gradient • Quite permeable to Cl– Membrane Potential Changes Used as Communication Signals • Membrane potential changes when – Concentrations of ions across membrane change – Membrane permeability to ions changes • Changes produce two types signals – Graded potentials • Incoming signals operating over short distances • Mostly arrive at axodendritic and axosomatic synapses • Collectively control the post-synaptic neuron – Action potentials • Long-distance signals of axons Action Potentials (AP) • Principle way neurons send signals • Principal means of long-distance neural communication • Occur only in muscle cells and axons of neurons • Brief reversal of membrane potential with a change in voltage of ~100 mV • Do not decay over distance as graded potentials do 8 2/27/2019 Figure 11.11 The action potential (AP) is a brief change in membrane potential in a “patch” of membrane that is depolarized by local currents. The big picture The key players Voltage-gated Na+ channels Voltage-gated K+ channels 1 Resting state 2 Depolarization Outside Outside cell cell +30 3 3 Repolarization Inside Inside Activation Inactivation 0 cell gate gate cell 2 Action Closed Opened Inactivated Closed Opened potential 4 Hyperpolarization The events –55 Threshold Potassium Sodium channel Membrane potential (mV) potential Membrane –70 1 1 channel 4 0 1 2 3 4 Time (ms) Activation gates
Recommended publications
  • Long-Term Potentiation Differentially Affects Two Components of Synaptic
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 85, pp. 9346-9350, December 1988 Neurobiology Long-term potentiation differentially affects two components of synaptic responses in hippocampus (plasticity/N-methyl-D-aspartate/D-2-amino-5-phosphonovglerate/facilitation) DOMINIQUE MULLER*t AND GARY LYNCH Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717 Communicated by Leon N Cooper, September 6, 1988 (receivedfor review June 20, 1988) ABSTRACT We have used low magnesium concentrations ing electrode was positioned in field CAlb between two and the specific antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate stimulating electrodes placed in fields CAla and CAlc; this (D-AP5) to estimate the effects of long-term potentiation (LTP) allowed us to activate separate inputs to a common pool of on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA recep- target cells. Stimulation voltages were adjusted to produce tor-mediated components of postsynaptic responses. LTP in- field EPSPs of -1.5 mV and did not elicit population spikes duction resulted in a considerably larger potentiation of non- in any of the responses included for data analysis. NMDA as opposed to NMDA receptor-related currents. In- Paired-pulse facilitation was produced by applying two creasing the size of postsynaptic potentials with greater stimulation pulses separated by 30 or 50 ms to the same stimulation currents or with paired-pulse facilitation produced stimulating electrode and LTP was induced by patterned opposite effects; i.e., those aspects ofthe response dependent on burst stimulation-i.e., 10 bursts delivered at 5 Hz, each NMDA receptor's increased to a greater degree than did those burst being composed of four pulses at 100 Hz (see ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurophysiology of Frog Dorsal Root Afferent Fibers and Their Intraspinal Processes
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1989 Neurophysiology of Frog Dorsal Root Afferent Fibers and Their Intraspinal Processes Nancy C. Tkacs Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Physiology Commons Recommended Citation Tkacs, Nancy C., "Neurophysiology of Frog Dorsal Root Afferent Fibers and Their Intraspinal Processes" (1989). Dissertations. 2652. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2652 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1989 Nancy C. Tkacs UBRA~Y·· NEUROPHYSIOLOGY OF FROG DORSAL ROOT AFFERENT FIBERS AND THEIR INTRASPINAL PROCESSES by Nancy C. Tkacs A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of .Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 1989 DEDICATION To Bill, with deep love and gratitude ii ACKNOWLEDG.EMENTS I would like to thank the faculty of the Department of Physiology for the excellent training I have received. I am particularly grateful to Dr. James Filkins for supporting my dissertation research. My thanks also go to Dr. Charles Webber, Dr. David Euler, Dr. David Carpenter, and Dr. Sarah Shefner for serving on my dissertation committee. Their helpful suggestions added much to the research and the dissertation. My gratitude goes to several individuals who unselfishly shared their time, resources, and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Potential and Synapses
    SENSORY RECEPTORS RECEPTORS GATEWAY TO THE PERCEPTION AND SENSATION Registering of inputs, coding, integration and adequate response PROPERTIES OF THE SENSORY SYSTEM According the type of the stimulus: According to function: MECHANORECEPTORS Telereceptors CHEMORECEPTORS Exteroreceptors THERMORECEPTORS Proprioreceptors PHOTORECEPTORS interoreceptors NOCICEPTORS STIMULUS Reception Receptor – modified nerve or epithelial cell responsive to changes in external or internal environment with the ability to code these changes as electrical potentials Adequate stimulus – stimulus to which the receptor has lowest threshold – maximum sensitivity Transduction – transformation of the stimulus to membrane potential – to generator potential– to action potential Transmission – stimulus energies are transported to CNS in the form of action potentials Integration – sensory information is transported to CNS as frequency code (quantity of the stimulus, quantity of environmental changes) •Sensation is the awareness of changes in the internal and external environment •Perception is the conscious interpretation of those stimuli CLASSIFICATION OF RECEPTORS - adaptation NONADAPTING RECEPTORS WITH CONSTANT FIRING BY CONSTANT STIMULUS NONADAPTING – PAIN TONIC – SLOWLY ADAPTING With decrease of firing (AP frequency) by constant stimulus PHASIC– RAPIDLY ADAPTING With rapid decrease of firing (AP frequency) by constant stimulus ACCOMODATION – ADAPTATION CHARACTERISTICS OF PHASIC RECEPTORS ALTERATIONS OF THE MEMBRANE POTENTIAL ACTION POTENTIAL TRANSMEMBRANE POTENTIAL
    [Show full text]
  • Fast and Slow Synaptic Potentials Produced Ina Mammalian
    Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 83, pp. 1941-1944, March 1986 Neurobiology Fast and slow synaptic potentials produced in a mammalian sympathetic ganglion by colon distension (visceral afferent/inferior mesenteric ganglion/noncholinergic) STEPHEN PETERS AND DAVID L. KREULEN Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ 85724 Communicated by C. Ladd Prosser, November 1, 1985 ABSTRACT Radial distension of the large intestine pro- way also comprises noncholinergic fibers; indeed, it remains duced a slow depolarization in a population of neurons in the to be determined whether noncholinergic slow EPSPs even inferior mesenteric ganglion of the guinea pig. The slow occur physiologically. potentials often occurred simultaneously with cholinergic fast We report here the discovery of a noncholinergic sensory potentials [(excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs)] yet pathway that projects from the distal colon to the inferior persisted in the presence of nicotinic and muscarinic choliner- mesenteric ganglion (1MG) of the guinea pig. This pathway, gic antagonists when all fast EPSPs were absent. The amplitude activated by colon distension, produces noncholinergic slow of the distension-induced noncholinergic slow depolarization depolarizations resembling nerve-evoked slow EPSPs in increased with increasing distension pressure. For distensions sympathetic ganglion cells. Often, distension of the colon of 1-min duration at pressures of 10-20 cm of water, the mean produced both an increase in cholinergic EPSPs and a slow depolarization amplitude was 3.4 mV. The slow depolarization depolarization, suggesting a simultaneous action of two was associated with an increase in membrane resistance, and cell. The prolonged periods ofcolon distension resulted in a tachyphylax- different neurotransmitters on a single ganglion is of the depolarization.
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Plasticity in the Brain During Neuropathic Pain
    biomedicines Review Neural Plasticity in the Brain during Neuropathic Pain Myeong Seong Bak 1, Haney Park 1 and Sun Kwang Kim 1,2,* 1 Department of Science in Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea; [email protected] (M.S.B.); [email protected] (H.P.) 2 Department of Physiology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-961-0491 Abstract: Neuropathic pain is an intractable chronic pain, caused by damage to the somatosensory nervous system. To date, treatment for neuropathic pain has limited effects. For the development of efficient therapeutic methods, it is essential to fully understand the pathological mechanisms of neuropathic pain. Besides abnormal sensitization in the periphery and spinal cord, accumulating evidence suggests that neural plasticity in the brain is also critical for the development and mainte- nance of this pain. Recent technological advances in the measurement and manipulation of neuronal activity allow us to understand maladaptive plastic changes in the brain during neuropathic pain more precisely and modulate brain activity to reverse pain states at the preclinical and clinical levels. In this review paper, we discuss the current understanding of pathological neural plasticity in the four pain-related brain areas: the primary somatosensory cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex, the periaqueductal gray, and the basal ganglia. We also discuss potential treatments for neuropathic pain based on the modulation of neural plasticity in these brain areas. Keywords: neuropathic pain; neural plasticity; primary somatosensory cortex; anterior cingulate cortex; periaqueductal grey; basal ganglia Citation: Bak, M.S.; Park, H.; Kim, S.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Nervous Tissue
    Nervous Tissue • Controls and integrates all body activities within limits that maintain life • Three basic functions – sensing changes with sensory receptors • fullness of stomach or sun on your face – interpreting and remembering those changes – reacting to those changes with effectors • muscular contractions • glandular secretions 12-1 Major Structures of the Nervous System • Brain, cranial nerves, spinal cord, spinal nerves, ganglia, enteric plexuses and sensory receptors 12-2 Organization of the Nervous System • CNS is brain and spinal cord • PNS is everything else 12-3 Nervous System Divisions • Central nervous system (CNS) – consists of the brain and spinal cord • Peripheral nervous system (PNS) – consists of cranial and spinal nerves that contain both sensory and motor fibers – connects CNS to muscles, glands & all sensory receptors 12-4 Subdivisions of the PNS • Somatic (voluntary) nervous system (SNS) – neurons from cutaneous and special sensory receptors to the CNS – motor neurons to skeletal muscle tissue • Autonomic (involuntary) nervous systems – sensory neurons from visceral organs to CNS – motor neurons to smooth & cardiac muscle and glands • sympathetic division (speeds up heart rate) • parasympathetic division (slow down heart rate) • Enteric nervous system (ENS) – involuntary sensory & motor neurons control GI tract – neurons function independently of ANS & CNS 12-5 Neurons • Functional unit of nervous system • Have capacity to produce action potentials – electrical excitability • Cell body • Cell processes = dendrites
    [Show full text]
  • Bi 360 Week 4 Discussion Questions: Electrical and Chemical Synapses
    Bi 360 Week 4 Discussion Questions: Electrical and Chemical Synapses 1a) What is the difference between a non-rectifying electrical synapse and a rectifying electrical synapse? A non-rectifying electrical synapse allows information to flow between two cells in either direction (presynaptic cell postsynaptic cell and postsynaptic cell presynaptic cell). A rectifying electrical synapse allows information to flow in only one direction; positive current will flow in one direction which is equivalent to negative current flowing in the opposite direction. 1b) You are conducting a voltage clamp experiment to determine the properties of a synapse within the central nervous system. You conduct the experiment as follows: 1) You depolarize the presynaptic cell and record the voltage in both the pre- and the postsynaptic cell. 2) You hyperpolarize the presynaptic cell and record from the pre- and postsynaptic cell. 3) You depolarize the postsynaptic cell and record from the pre- and postsynaptic cell. 4) You hyperpolarize the postsynaptic cell and record from the pre- and postsynaptic cell. Analyze each piece of data shown below and determine what kind of synapse this is. How did you draw your conclusion? This is a rectifying electrical synapse. When you depolarize the presynaptic cell, there is a response in both the pre and post synaptic cell. When the postsynaptic cell is depolarized, however, there is a depolarization in the postsynaptic cell but no response in the presynaptic cell. A similar trend can be seen in the hyperpolarizing data but in the opposite direction. This means there must be a voltage dependent gate allowing positive current to flow in one direction while preventing it from flowing in the other.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Introduction to the Nervous System and Nervous Tissue
    11 Introduction to the Nervous System and Nervous Tissue ou can’t turn on the television or radio, much less go online, without seeing some- 11.1 Overview of the Nervous thing to remind you of the nervous system. From advertisements for medications System 381 Yto treat depression and other psychiatric conditions to stories about celebrities and 11.2 Nervous Tissue 384 their battles with illegal drugs, information about the nervous system is everywhere in 11.3 Electrophysiology our popular culture. And there is good reason for this—the nervous system controls our of Neurons 393 perception and experience of the world. In addition, it directs voluntary movement, and 11.4 Neuronal Synapses 406 is the seat of our consciousness, personality, and learning and memory. Along with the 11.5 Neurotransmitters 413 endocrine system, the nervous system regulates many aspects of homeostasis, including 11.6 Functional Groups respiratory rate, blood pressure, body temperature, the sleep/wake cycle, and blood pH. of Neurons 417 In this chapter we introduce the multitasking nervous system and its basic functions and divisions. We then examine the structure and physiology of the main tissue of the nervous system: nervous tissue. As you read, notice that many of the same principles you discovered in the muscle tissue chapter (see Chapter 10) apply here as well. MODULE 11.1 Overview of the Nervous System Learning Outcomes 1. Describe the major functions of the nervous system. 2. Describe the structures and basic functions of each organ of the central and peripheral nervous systems. 3. Explain the major differences between the two functional divisions of the peripheral nervous system.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Entitled the Induction of Traumatic Brain Injury by Blood
    A Dissertation entitled The Induction of Traumatic Brain Injury by Blood Brain Barrier Disruption by Mark D. Skopin Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Engineering ________________________________________________________ Dr. Scott C. Molitor, Ph.D., Committee Chair ________________________________________________________ Dr. Ragheb Assaly, M.D., Committee Member ________________________________________________________ Dr. Ronald L. Fournier, Ph.D., Committee Member ________________________________________________________ Dr. Hermann von Grafenstein, Ph.D., Committee Member ________________________________________________________ Dr. Patricia A. Relue, Ph.D., Committee Member ________________________________________________________ Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Ph.D., Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2011 Copyright 2011, Mark D. Skopin This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of The Induction of Traumatic Brain Injury by Blood Brain Barrier Disruption by Mark D. Skopin Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Engineering University of Toledo May 2011 Animal models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are utilized for the study of underlying mechanisms and for the development of potential therapeutics. Traditional TBI models apply concussive
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Newly Generated Interneurons in the Basolateral Amygdala of Adult Mice
    OPEN Molecular Psychiatry (2018) 23, 521–532 www.nature.com/mp ORIGINAL ARTICLE Evidence for newly generated interneurons in the basolateral amygdala of adult mice DJ Jhaveri1,2,5, A Tedoldi1,5, S Hunt1, R Sullivan1, NR Watts3, JM Power4, PF Bartlett1,6 and P Sah1,6 New neurons are continually generated from the resident populations of precursor cells in selective niches of the adult mammalian brain such as the hippocampal dentate gyrus and the olfactory bulb. However, whether such cells are present in the adult amygdala, and their neurogenic capacity, is not known. Using the neurosphere assay, we demonstrate that a small number of precursor cells, the majority of which express Achaete-scute complex homolog 1 (Ascl1), are present in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) of the adult mouse. Using neuron-specific Thy1-YFP transgenic mice, we show that YFP+ cells in BLA-derived neurospheres have a neuronal morphology, co-express the neuronal marker βIII-tubulin, and generate action potentials, confirming their neuronal phenotype. In vivo, we demonstrate the presence of newly generated BrdU-labeled cells in the adult BLA, and show that a proportion of these cells co-express the immature neuronal marker doublecortin (DCX). Furthermore, we reveal that a significant proportion of GFP+ neurons (~23%) in the BLA are newly generated (BrdU+) in DCX-GFP mice, and using whole-cell recordings in acute slices we demonstrate that the GFP+ cells display electrophysiological properties that are characteristic of interneurons. Using retrovirus-GFP labeling as well as the Ascl1CreERT2 mouse line, we further confirm that the precursor cells within the BLA give rise to mature and functional interneurons that persist in the BLA for at least 8 weeks after their birth.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Exposure to Local but Not Inhalation Anesthetics Affects
    Anesthesiology 2005; 102:353–63 © 2005 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. Long-term Exposure to Local but Not Inhalation Anesthetics Affects Neurite Regeneration and Synapse Formation between Identified Lymnaea Neurons Shin Onizuka, M.D.,* Mayumi Takasaki, M.D., Ph.D.,† Naweed I. Syed, Ph.D.‡ Background: General and local anesthetics are used in vari- MOST surgical procedures require either general or local ous combinations during surgical procedures to repair dam- anesthetic treatments, which last from a few minutes to aged tissues and organs, which in almost all instances involve several hours. Although surgical interventions necessi- nervous system functions. Because synaptic transmission re- tate the use of various anesthetic agents, their choices covers rapidly from various inhalation anesthetics, it is gener- Downloaded from http://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article-pdf/102/2/353/357598/0000542-200502000-00018.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 ally assumed that their effects on nerve regeneration and syn- should be based on the ones with the least deleterious apse formation that precede injury or surgery may not be as effects on neuronal function, nerve regeneration, and detrimental as that of their local counterparts. However, a di- synaptic repair. This information is important in light of rect comparison of most commonly used inhalation (sevoflu- better choices vis-à-vis various agents that are available to rane, isoflurane) and local anesthetics (lidocaine, bupivacaine), vis-à-vis
    [Show full text]
  • Normal Physiology
    YEREVAN STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY AFTER M. HERATSI NORMAL PHYSIOLOGY HANDOUT FOR FOREIGN STUDENTS YEREVAN – 2008 YEREVAN STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY AFTER M. HERATSI Ter-Markosyan A.S., Harutunyan K.R., Arakelyan K.P., Avetisyan K.A. NORMAL PHYSIOLOGY HANDOUT FOR FOREIGN STUDENTS Editor: professor Khudaverdyan D.N. YEREVAN Publishing house of the Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi 2008 UDC 612 (07) Normal Physiology (Handout for Foreign Students) / Ter- Markosyan A.S., Harutunyan K.R., Arakelyan K.P., Avetisyan K.A. -Yerevan, YMSU, 2008 - 330 pp. Editor: professor Khudaverdyan D.N. Reviewers: Khanbabyan M.V., Professor of the Human and Animals’ Physiology Department of the Yerevan State Pedagogical University after Kh. Abovyan, Doctor of Medical Sciences Hakobyan N.S., Professor of the Human and Animals’ Physiology Department of the Yerevan State University, Doctor of Biological Sciences English language editor: Bisharyan M.N. In the handout are represented the main parts of physiology, which correspond to the syllabus of the normal physiology course. It will be useful for foreign students of medical and biological high schools. The handout is adopted by Methodical Comission for Foreign Students of theYerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi. ISBN 978-9994-40-78-7 © Dpt. of Physiology of YSMU, 2008 ºðºì²ÜÆ Ø. кð²òàô ²Üì²Ü äºî²Î²Ü ´ÄÞÎ²Î²Ü Ð²Ø²Èê²ð²Ü î»ñ-سñÏáëÛ³Ý ².ê., гñáõÃÛáõÝÛ³Ý ø.è., ²é³ù»ÉÛ³Ý Î.ä., ²í»ïÇëÛ³Ý Î.². ÜàðØ²È üƼÆàÈà¶Æ² àôêàôØܲغÂà¸²Î²Ü ÒºèܲðÎ ²ðî²ê²ÐزÜòÆ àôê²ÜàÔܺðÆ Ð²Ø²ð ÊÙµ³·Çñ` åñáý»ëáñ ¸.
    [Show full text]