DOCSLIB.ORG

Bi 360 Week 4 Discussion Questions: Electrical and Chemical Synapses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bi 360 Week 4 Discussion Questions: Electrical and Chemical Synapses Bi 360 Week 4 Discussion Questions: Electrical and Chemical Synapses 1a) What is the difference between a non-rectifying electrical synapse and a rectifying electrical synapse? A non-rectifying electrical synapse allows information to flow between two cells in either direction (presynaptic cell postsynaptic cell and postsynaptic cell presynaptic cell). A rectifying electrical synapse allows information to flow in only one direction; positive current will flow in one direction which is equivalent to negative current flowing in the opposite direction. 1b) You are conducting a voltage clamp experiment to determine the properties of a synapse within the central nervous system. You conduct the experiment as follows: 1) You depolarize the presynaptic cell and record the voltage in both the pre- and the postsynaptic cell. 2) You hyperpolarize the presynaptic cell and record from the pre- and postsynaptic cell. 3) You depolarize the postsynaptic cell and record from the pre- and postsynaptic cell. 4) You hyperpolarize the postsynaptic cell and record from the pre- and postsynaptic cell. Analyze each piece of data shown below and determine what kind of synapse this is. How did you draw your conclusion? This is a rectifying electrical synapse. When you depolarize the presynaptic cell, there is a response in both the pre and post synaptic cell. When the postsynaptic cell is depolarized, however, there is a depolarization in the postsynaptic cell but no response in the presynaptic cell. A similar trend can be seen in the hyperpolarizing data but in the opposite direction. This means there must be a voltage dependent gate allowing positive current to flow in one direction while preventing it from flowing in the other. 2) Compare and contrast electrical synaptic transmission with chemical synaptic transmission. Electrical synapses connect two cells together via cytoplasmic linkages (i.e. they are directly connected and can pass information from one cell to the next). They are fast, reliable, usually bidirectional, have no synaptic delay, and are usually depolarizing. Chemical synapses pass information from one cell to another across a small gap (synaptic cleft). Electrical signals of the action potential must first be converted into a chemical signal (i.e., the neurotransmitter) in the presynaptic cell, diffuse across the synaptic cleft, and convert back to an electrical signal (post synaptic potential) in the postsynaptic cell. Chemical synapses are not as fast, not as reliable, usually unidirectional, they have a ~1ms synaptic delay, and they can be both depolarizing and hyperpolarizing. 3) What is the difference between an EPSP and an IPSP? What determines whether a post synaptic potential will be either excitatory or inhibitory? An EPSP (excitatory postsynaptic potential) is a small depolarizing change in membrane potential that brings the overall cell potential closer to the threshold for generating an action potential at the axon hillock. An IPSP (inhibitory postsynaptic potential) is a small hyperpolarizing change in membrane potential that moves the overall cell potential further from the threshold for generating an action potential at the axon hillock. Both EPSPs and IPSPs are the result of the release of transmitter from a pre-synaptic cell. The type of ion entering the cell usually determines whether it will be excitatory or inhibitory. An EPSP is typically generated by a ligand-gated channel in the postsynaptic membrane that is selective for sodium or sodium + potassium. An IPSP is typically generated by a ligand-gated channel in the postsynaptic membrane that is selective for chloride or potassium. 4) In the following experiment, you stimulate a vertebrate motor neuron and record the voltage from two locations in the muscle as depicted in the diagram below. You obtain the following data: Why do you see a small initial depolarizing potential (a “hump”) in V1 but not V2? The small potential is the EPSP (also known as the End Plate Potential) produced by the neurotransmitter binding to a post synaptic receptor. This particular EPSP/EPP is unusual because it is the result of an increase in both gNa and gK. This increase in gNa and gK causes a depolarizing EPP/EPSP large enough to produce a regenerative action potential which travels actively along the muscle membrane from V1 to V2. Since the depolarizing PSP is a passive response, it will decrement over distance and will not be seen in V2. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Long-Term Potentiation Differentially Affects Two Components of Synaptic
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 85, pp. 9346-9350, December 1988 Neurobiology Long-term potentiation differentially affects two components of synaptic responses in hippocampus (plasticity/N-methyl-D-aspartate/D-2-amino-5-phosphonovglerate/facilitation) DOMINIQUE MULLER*t AND GARY LYNCH Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717 Communicated by Leon N Cooper, September 6, 1988 (receivedfor review June 20, 1988) ABSTRACT We have used low magnesium concentrations ing electrode was positioned in field CAlb between two and the specific antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate stimulating electrodes placed in fields CAla and CAlc; this (D-AP5) to estimate the effects of long-term potentiation (LTP) allowed us to activate separate inputs to a common pool of on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA recep- target cells. Stimulation voltages were adjusted to produce tor-mediated components of postsynaptic responses. LTP in- field EPSPs of -1.5 mV and did not elicit population spikes duction resulted in a considerably larger potentiation of non- in any of the responses included for data analysis. NMDA as opposed to NMDA receptor-related currents. In- Paired-pulse facilitation was produced by applying two creasing the size of postsynaptic potentials with greater stimulation pulses separated by 30 or 50 ms to the same stimulation currents or with paired-pulse facilitation produced stimulating electrode and LTP was induced by patterned opposite effects; i.e., those aspects ofthe response dependent on burst stimulation-i.e., 10 bursts delivered at 5 Hz, each NMDA receptor's increased to a greater degree than did those burst being composed of four pulses at 100 Hz (see ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurophysiology of Frog Dorsal Root Afferent Fibers and Their Intraspinal Processes
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1989 Neurophysiology of Frog Dorsal Root Afferent Fibers and Their Intraspinal Processes Nancy C. Tkacs Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Physiology Commons Recommended Citation Tkacs, Nancy C., "Neurophysiology of Frog Dorsal Root Afferent Fibers and Their Intraspinal Processes" (1989). Dissertations. 2652. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2652 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1989 Nancy C. Tkacs UBRA~Y·· NEUROPHYSIOLOGY OF FROG DORSAL ROOT AFFERENT FIBERS AND THEIR INTRASPINAL PROCESSES by Nancy C. Tkacs A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of .Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 1989 DEDICATION To Bill, with deep love and gratitude ii ACKNOWLEDG.EMENTS I would like to thank the faculty of the Department of Physiology for the excellent training I have received. I am particularly grateful to Dr. James Filkins for supporting my dissertation research. My thanks also go to Dr. Charles Webber, Dr. David Euler, Dr. David Carpenter, and Dr. Sarah Shefner for serving on my dissertation committee. Their helpful suggestions added much to the research and the dissertation. My gratitude goes to several individuals who unselfishly shared their time, resources, and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Potential and Synapses
    SENSORY RECEPTORS RECEPTORS GATEWAY TO THE PERCEPTION AND SENSATION Registering of inputs, coding, integration and adequate response PROPERTIES OF THE SENSORY SYSTEM According the type of the stimulus: According to function: MECHANORECEPTORS Telereceptors CHEMORECEPTORS Exteroreceptors THERMORECEPTORS Proprioreceptors PHOTORECEPTORS interoreceptors NOCICEPTORS STIMULUS Reception Receptor – modified nerve or epithelial cell responsive to changes in external or internal environment with the ability to code these changes as electrical potentials Adequate stimulus – stimulus to which the receptor has lowest threshold – maximum sensitivity Transduction – transformation of the stimulus to membrane potential – to generator potential– to action potential Transmission – stimulus energies are transported to CNS in the form of action potentials Integration – sensory information is transported to CNS as frequency code (quantity of the stimulus, quantity of environmental changes) •Sensation is the awareness of changes in the internal and external environment •Perception is the conscious interpretation of those stimuli CLASSIFICATION OF RECEPTORS - adaptation NONADAPTING RECEPTORS WITH CONSTANT FIRING BY CONSTANT STIMULUS NONADAPTING – PAIN TONIC – SLOWLY ADAPTING With decrease of firing (AP frequency) by constant stimulus PHASIC– RAPIDLY ADAPTING With rapid decrease of firing (AP frequency) by constant stimulus ACCOMODATION – ADAPTATION CHARACTERISTICS OF PHASIC RECEPTORS ALTERATIONS OF THE MEMBRANE POTENTIAL ACTION POTENTIAL TRANSMEMBRANE POTENTIAL
    [Show full text]
  • Fast and Slow Synaptic Potentials Produced Ina Mammalian
    Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 83, pp. 1941-1944, March 1986 Neurobiology Fast and slow synaptic potentials produced in a mammalian sympathetic ganglion by colon distension (visceral afferent/inferior mesenteric ganglion/noncholinergic) STEPHEN PETERS AND DAVID L. KREULEN Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ 85724 Communicated by C. Ladd Prosser, November 1, 1985 ABSTRACT Radial distension of the large intestine pro- way also comprises noncholinergic fibers; indeed, it remains duced a slow depolarization in a population of neurons in the to be determined whether noncholinergic slow EPSPs even inferior mesenteric ganglion of the guinea pig. The slow occur physiologically. potentials often occurred simultaneously with cholinergic fast We report here the discovery of a noncholinergic sensory potentials [(excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs)] yet pathway that projects from the distal colon to the inferior persisted in the presence of nicotinic and muscarinic choliner- mesenteric ganglion (1MG) of the guinea pig. This pathway, gic antagonists when all fast EPSPs were absent. The amplitude activated by colon distension, produces noncholinergic slow of the distension-induced noncholinergic slow depolarization depolarizations resembling nerve-evoked slow EPSPs in increased with increasing distension pressure. For distensions sympathetic ganglion cells. Often, distension of the colon of 1-min duration at pressures of 10-20 cm of water, the mean produced both an increase in cholinergic EPSPs and a slow depolarization amplitude was 3.4 mV. The slow depolarization depolarization, suggesting a simultaneous action of two was associated with an increase in membrane resistance, and cell. The prolonged periods ofcolon distension resulted in a tachyphylax- different neurotransmitters on a single ganglion is of the depolarization.
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Plasticity in the Brain During Neuropathic Pain
    biomedicines Review Neural Plasticity in the Brain during Neuropathic Pain Myeong Seong Bak 1, Haney Park 1 and Sun Kwang Kim 1,2,* 1 Department of Science in Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea; [email protected] (M.S.B.); [email protected] (H.P.) 2 Department of Physiology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-961-0491 Abstract: Neuropathic pain is an intractable chronic pain, caused by damage to the somatosensory nervous system. To date, treatment for neuropathic pain has limited effects. For the development of efficient therapeutic methods, it is essential to fully understand the pathological mechanisms of neuropathic pain. Besides abnormal sensitization in the periphery and spinal cord, accumulating evidence suggests that neural plasticity in the brain is also critical for the development and mainte- nance of this pain. Recent technological advances in the measurement and manipulation of neuronal activity allow us to understand maladaptive plastic changes in the brain during neuropathic pain more precisely and modulate brain activity to reverse pain states at the preclinical and clinical levels. In this review paper, we discuss the current understanding of pathological neural plasticity in the four pain-related brain areas: the primary somatosensory cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex, the periaqueductal gray, and the basal ganglia. We also discuss potential treatments for neuropathic pain based on the modulation of neural plasticity in these brain areas. Keywords: neuropathic pain; neural plasticity; primary somatosensory cortex; anterior cingulate cortex; periaqueductal grey; basal ganglia Citation: Bak, M.S.; Park, H.; Kim, S.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Nervous Tissue
    Nervous Tissue • Controls and integrates all body activities within limits that maintain life • Three basic functions – sensing changes with sensory receptors • fullness of stomach or sun on your face – interpreting and remembering those changes – reacting to those changes with effectors • muscular contractions • glandular secretions 12-1 Major Structures of the Nervous System • Brain, cranial nerves, spinal cord, spinal nerves, ganglia, enteric plexuses and sensory receptors 12-2 Organization of the Nervous System • CNS is brain and spinal cord • PNS is everything else 12-3 Nervous System Divisions • Central nervous system (CNS) – consists of the brain and spinal cord • Peripheral nervous system (PNS) – consists of cranial and spinal nerves that contain both sensory and motor fibers – connects CNS to muscles, glands & all sensory receptors 12-4 Subdivisions of the PNS • Somatic (voluntary) nervous system (SNS) – neurons from cutaneous and special sensory receptors to the CNS – motor neurons to skeletal muscle tissue • Autonomic (involuntary) nervous systems – sensory neurons from visceral organs to CNS – motor neurons to smooth & cardiac muscle and glands • sympathetic division (speeds up heart rate) • parasympathetic division (slow down heart rate) • Enteric nervous system (ENS) – involuntary sensory & motor neurons control GI tract – neurons function independently of ANS & CNS 12-5 Neurons • Functional unit of nervous system • Have capacity to produce action potentials – electrical excitability • Cell body • Cell processes = dendrites
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Introduction to the Nervous System and Nervous Tissue
    11 Introduction to the Nervous System and Nervous Tissue ou can’t turn on the television or radio, much less go online, without seeing some- 11.1 Overview of the Nervous thing to remind you of the nervous system. From advertisements for medications System 381 Yto treat depression and other psychiatric conditions to stories about celebrities and 11.2 Nervous Tissue 384 their battles with illegal drugs, information about the nervous system is everywhere in 11.3 Electrophysiology our popular culture. And there is good reason for this—the nervous system controls our of Neurons 393 perception and experience of the world. In addition, it directs voluntary movement, and 11.4 Neuronal Synapses 406 is the seat of our consciousness, personality, and learning and memory. Along with the 11.5 Neurotransmitters 413 endocrine system, the nervous system regulates many aspects of homeostasis, including 11.6 Functional Groups respiratory rate, blood pressure, body temperature, the sleep/wake cycle, and blood pH. of Neurons 417 In this chapter we introduce the multitasking nervous system and its basic functions and divisions. We then examine the structure and physiology of the main tissue of the nervous system: nervous tissue. As you read, notice that many of the same principles you discovered in the muscle tissue chapter (see Chapter 10) apply here as well. MODULE 11.1 Overview of the Nervous System Learning Outcomes 1. Describe the major functions of the nervous system. 2. Describe the structures and basic functions of each organ of the central and peripheral nervous systems. 3. Explain the major differences between the two functional divisions of the peripheral nervous system.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Entitled the Induction of Traumatic Brain Injury by Blood
    A Dissertation entitled The Induction of Traumatic Brain Injury by Blood Brain Barrier Disruption by Mark D. Skopin Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Engineering ________________________________________________________ Dr. Scott C. Molitor, Ph.D., Committee Chair ________________________________________________________ Dr. Ragheb Assaly, M.D., Committee Member ________________________________________________________ Dr. Ronald L. Fournier, Ph.D., Committee Member ________________________________________________________ Dr. Hermann von Grafenstein, Ph.D., Committee Member ________________________________________________________ Dr. Patricia A. Relue, Ph.D., Committee Member ________________________________________________________ Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Ph.D., Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2011 Copyright 2011, Mark D. Skopin This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of The Induction of Traumatic Brain Injury by Blood Brain Barrier Disruption by Mark D. Skopin Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Engineering University of Toledo May 2011 Animal models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are utilized for the study of underlying mechanisms and for the development of potential therapeutics. Traditional TBI models apply concussive
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Newly Generated Interneurons in the Basolateral Amygdala of Adult Mice
    OPEN Molecular Psychiatry (2018) 23, 521–532 www.nature.com/mp ORIGINAL ARTICLE Evidence for newly generated interneurons in the basolateral amygdala of adult mice DJ Jhaveri1,2,5, A Tedoldi1,5, S Hunt1, R Sullivan1, NR Watts3, JM Power4, PF Bartlett1,6 and P Sah1,6 New neurons are continually generated from the resident populations of precursor cells in selective niches of the adult mammalian brain such as the hippocampal dentate gyrus and the olfactory bulb. However, whether such cells are present in the adult amygdala, and their neurogenic capacity, is not known. Using the neurosphere assay, we demonstrate that a small number of precursor cells, the majority of which express Achaete-scute complex homolog 1 (Ascl1), are present in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) of the adult mouse. Using neuron-specific Thy1-YFP transgenic mice, we show that YFP+ cells in BLA-derived neurospheres have a neuronal morphology, co-express the neuronal marker βIII-tubulin, and generate action potentials, confirming their neuronal phenotype. In vivo, we demonstrate the presence of newly generated BrdU-labeled cells in the adult BLA, and show that a proportion of these cells co-express the immature neuronal marker doublecortin (DCX). Furthermore, we reveal that a significant proportion of GFP+ neurons (~23%) in the BLA are newly generated (BrdU+) in DCX-GFP mice, and using whole-cell recordings in acute slices we demonstrate that the GFP+ cells display electrophysiological properties that are characteristic of interneurons. Using retrovirus-GFP labeling as well as the Ascl1CreERT2 mouse line, we further confirm that the precursor cells within the BLA give rise to mature and functional interneurons that persist in the BLA for at least 8 weeks after their birth.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Exposure to Local but Not Inhalation Anesthetics Affects
    Anesthesiology 2005; 102:353–63 © 2005 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. Long-term Exposure to Local but Not Inhalation Anesthetics Affects Neurite Regeneration and Synapse Formation between Identified Lymnaea Neurons Shin Onizuka, M.D.,* Mayumi Takasaki, M.D., Ph.D.,† Naweed I. Syed, Ph.D.‡ Background: General and local anesthetics are used in vari- MOST surgical procedures require either general or local ous combinations during surgical procedures to repair dam- anesthetic treatments, which last from a few minutes to aged tissues and organs, which in almost all instances involve several hours. Although surgical interventions necessi- nervous system functions. Because synaptic transmission re- tate the use of various anesthetic agents, their choices covers rapidly from various inhalation anesthetics, it is gener- Downloaded from http://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article-pdf/102/2/353/357598/0000542-200502000-00018.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 ally assumed that their effects on nerve regeneration and syn- should be based on the ones with the least deleterious apse formation that precede injury or surgery may not be as effects on neuronal function, nerve regeneration, and detrimental as that of their local counterparts. However, a di- synaptic repair. This information is important in light of rect comparison of most commonly used inhalation (sevoflu- better choices vis-à-vis various agents that are available to rane, isoflurane) and local anesthetics (lidocaine, bupivacaine), vis-à-vis
    [Show full text]
  • Disinhibition at Feedforward Inhibitory Synapses in Hippocampal Area CA1 Induces a Form of Long-Term Potentiation
    Disinhibition at Feedforward Inhibitory Synapses in Hippocampal Area CA1 Induces a Form of Long-Term Potentiation by John Oliver Heal Ormond A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Cell and Systems Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by John Oliver Heal Ormond (2009) Disinhibition at Feedforward Inhibitory Synapses in Hippocampal Area CA1 Induces a Form of Long-Term Potentiation Doctor of Philosophy (2009). John Oliver Heal Ormond Graduate Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto. Abstract One of the central questions of neuroscience research has been how the cellular and molecular components of the brain give rise to complex behaviours. Three major breakthroughs from the past sixty years have made the study of learning and memory central to our understanding of how the brain works. First, the psychologist Donald Hebb proposed that information storage in the brain could occur through the strengthening of the connections between neurons if the strengthening were restricted to neurons that were co-active (Hebb, 1949). Second, Milner and Scoville (1957) showed that the hippocampus is required for the acquisition of new long-term memories for consciously accessible, or declarative, information. Third, Bliss and Lømo (1973) demonstrated that the synapses between neurons in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus could indeed be potentiated in an activity-dependent manner. Long-term potentiation (LTP) of the glutamatergic synapses in area CA1, the primary output of the hippocampus, has since become the leading model of synaptic plasticity due to its dependence on NMDA receptors (NMDARs), required for spatial and temporal learning in intact animals, and its robust pathway specificity.
    [Show full text]
  • Atp Modulatory Actions on Hippocampal Synaptic Transmission
    ATP MODULATORY ACTIONS ON HIPPOCAMPAL SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION YUANJING YANG A thesis submitted to the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology in conforrnity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Queen's University Kingston, Ontario, Canada May 30,200 1 Copyright O Yuanjing Yang, 2001 National Library Bibliothèque nationale of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. me Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence dowing the exclusive permettant a la National Lhray of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, disûibute or seil reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thése sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/fïlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. 1. ABSTRACT ATP might play a role in the establishment of Long-term potentiation (LTP) in the hippocampus, which is one of the synaptic modifications proposed to underlie the memory process. In this study, we set out to investigate the modulatory effects and mechanisms of action of ATP on synaptic transmission in these synapses.
    [Show full text]