DOCSLIB.ORG

Suryavarman I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Suryavarman I Suryavarman I Suryavarman I (Khmer: សូរ្យវរ្មáŸáž“ទី១; posthumously Nirvanapada) was king of the Khmer Empire from 1006 to 1050.:134â“135 Suryavarman usurped King Udayadityavarman I, defeating his armies in approximately 1002. After a protracted war with Udayadityavarman's would-be successor, Jayavarman, Suryavarman I claimed the throne in 1010. Suryavarman was a Mahayana Buddhist:134 who was also tolerant of the growing Theravada Buddhist presence in the Khmer kingdom. Suryavarman I (Khmer: សូរ្យវរ្មáŸáž“ទី១; posthumously Nirvanapada) was king of the Khmer Empire from 1006 to 1050.[1]:134â“135 Suryavarman usurped King Udayadityavarman I, defeating his armies in approximately 1002, after a protracted war with Udayadityavarman's would-be successor, Jayavarman,[2] Suryavarman I claimed the throne in 1010. He thereby laid the foundation of Angkor, which was to arise some 15 km to the northwest, Jayavarman II died in the year 835 and he was succeeded by his son SÅ«ryavarman I â” Suryavarman I Suryavarman Ier (nom posthume : Narvanapala la) est un roi qui a régné sur l Empire khmer, de 1010 à 1050 après J. C. Après le règne de Udayadityavarman I, qui s acheva vers 1002 après J. C, il n y eut pas de successeur désigné ⦠Wikipédia en Français. Suryavarman II â” representado en un bajo relieve en Angkor Wat. Suryavarman II fue rey del Imperio jemer de un periodo que va de 1113 a 1150. Fue renombrado como reformador y constructor religioso del templo. Suryavarman I: Suryavarman I, great Khmer king of the Angkor period of Cambodian history. He was renowned as a conqueror and builder who greatly expanded his territorial holdings and consolidated the conquered lands into a strong, unified empire. Suryavarman defeated King Udayadityavarman by 1002 and. Suryavarman I ( Khmer : សូរ្យវរ្មáŸáž“ទី១ ; posthumously Nirvanapada ) was king of the Khmer Empire from 1006 to 1050. : 134â“135 Suryavarman usurped King Udayadityavarman I, defeating his armies in approximately 1002. After a protracted war with Udayadityavarman's would-be successor, Jayavarman, [2] Suryavarman I claimed the throne in 1010. Suryavarman I established diplomatic relations with the Chola dynasty of south India around 1012. Died c. 1050 great Khmer king of the Angkor period of Cambodian history. He was renowned as a conqueror and builder who greatly expanded his territorial holdings and consolidated the conquered lands into a strong, unified empire. Suryavarman defeated King Udayadityavarman by 1002 and Jayaviravarman (of Malay origin), his would-be successor, by 1010, securing the Khmer throne for himself. Suryavarman I was king of the Khmer Empire from 1006 to 1050.[1]:134â“135 Suryavarman usurped King Udayadityavarman I, defeating his armies in approximately 1002. After a protracted war with Udayadityavarman's would-be successor, Jayavarman, [2] Suryavarman I claimed the throne in 1010. Suryavarman was a Mahayana Buddhist[1]:134 who was also tolerant of the growing Theravada Buddhist presence in the Khmer kingdom. Suryavarman I is a campaign in Age of Empires II HD: Rise of the Rajas. It tells about how Suryavarman I comes to power before expanding the territory of his Khmer Empire. Suryavarman I is a cavalry hero with the appearance of an Elite Battle Elephant. As a hero, he cannot be converted and can regenerate health. The Suryavarman I campaign consists of 5 scenarios. The player plays as the Khmer, and the player color is cyan..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix Appendix
    APPENDIX APPENDIX DYNASTIC LISTS, WITH GOVERNORS AND GOVERNORS-GENERAL Burma and Arakan: A. Rulers of Pagan before 1044 B. The Pagan dynasty, 1044-1287 C. Myinsaing and Pinya, 1298-1364 D. Sagaing, 1315-64 E. Ava, 1364-1555 F. The Toungoo dynasty, 1486-1752 G. The Alaungpaya or Konbaung dynasty, 1752- 1885 H. Mon rulers of Hanthawaddy (Pegu) I. Arakan Cambodia: A. Funan B. Chenla C. The Angkor monarchy D. The post-Angkor period Champa: A. Linyi B. Champa Indonesia and Malaya: A. Java, Pre-Muslim period B. Java, Muslim period C. Malacca D. Acheh (Achin) E. Governors-General of the Netherlands East Indies Tai Dynasties: A. Sukhot'ai B. Ayut'ia C. Bangkok D. Muong Swa E. Lang Chang F. Vien Chang (Vientiane) G. Luang Prabang 954 APPENDIX 955 Vietnam: A. The Hong-Bang, 2879-258 B.c. B. The Thuc, 257-208 B.C. C. The Trieu, 207-I I I B.C. D. The Earlier Li, A.D. 544-602 E. The Ngo, 939-54 F. The Dinh, 968-79 G. The Earlier Le, 980-I009 H. The Later Li, I009-I225 I. The Tran, 1225-I400 J. The Ho, I400-I407 K. The restored Tran, I407-I8 L. The Later Le, I4I8-I8o4 M. The Mac, I527-I677 N. The Trinh, I539-I787 0. The Tay-Son, I778-I8o2 P. The Nguyen Q. Governors and governors-general of French Indo­ China APPENDIX DYNASTIC LISTS BURMA AND ARAKAN A. RULERS OF PAGAN BEFORE IOH (According to the Burmese chronicles) dat~ of accusion 1. Pyusawti 167 2. Timinyi, son of I 242 3· Yimminpaik, son of 2 299 4· Paikthili, son of 3 .
    [Show full text]
  • A STUDY of the NAMES of MONUMENTS in ANGKOR (Cambodia)
    A STUDY OF THE NAMES OF MONUMENTS IN ANGKOR (Cambodia) NHIM Sotheavin Sophia Asia Center for Research and Human Development, Sophia University Introduction This article aims at clarifying the concept of Khmer culture by specifically explaining the meanings of the names of the monuments in Angkor, names that have existed within the Khmer cultural community.1 Many works on Angkor history have been researched in different fields, such as the evolution of arts and architecture, through a systematic analysis of monuments and archaeological excavation analysis, and the most crucial are based on Cambodian epigraphy. My work however is meant to shed light on Angkor cultural history by studying the names of the monuments, and I intend to do so by searching for the original names that are found in ancient and middle period inscriptions, as well as those appearing in the oral tradition. This study also seeks to undertake a thorough verification of the condition and shape of the monuments, as well as the mode of affixation of names for them by the local inhabitants. I also wish to focus on certain crucial errors, as well as the insufficiency of earlier studies on the subject. To begin with, the books written in foreign languages often have mistakes in the vocabulary involved in the etymology of Khmer temples. Some researchers are not very familiar with the Khmer language, and besides, they might not have visited the site very often, or possibly also they did not pay too much attention to the oral tradition related to these ruins, a tradition that might be known to the village elders.
    [Show full text]
  • Siamese Attacks on Angkor Before 1430
    SIAMESE ATTACKS ON ANGKOR BEFORE 1430 LAWRENCE PALMER BRIGGS* Washington, D.C. IT IS A COMMON statement of writers of Cambodian and Siamese history that the Siamese overran Cambodia and captured Angkor Thom on one or more occasions before the final sack of that capital in 1430-31. The dates on which this event is said to have occurred are variously given as 1350-53, 1372-73, 1384-85, 1388, 1393-94, 1408, 1420- 21. As authority, these writers can cite almost any of the common versions of the Cambodian chronicle and some versions of the Annals of Ayuthia (Siam). After a careful study and comparison of the available data on the sub- ject, the writer is of the opinion that no such conquest occurred on any of the above mentioned dates, nor on any other date during this period, and that the first sack of Angkor Thom by the Siamese took place in 1430-31. SUKHOTHAI AND ANGKOR BEFORE 1350 At the end of the thirteenth century, the Tai of Sukhothai, in the upper Menam valley, who for about two centuries had been called Syam by their neighbors and were beginning to be called Sien (Hsien) by the Chinese and to call themselves Thai, were in control of most of what is now Siam and parts of some neighboring states. Under their first great kings - Indraditya and Rama Khamheng (from about 1250 to about 1317) - they conquered the Khmers of the upper and central Menam valley and greatly extended their territory; but in his great inscription of 1292, Rama Kham- heng does not mention Angkor among his conquests.' Chou Ta-kuan, who visited Angkor in 1296-97, says the country suffered from recent ravages of the Siamese;2 but in an inscription of 1304, the Khmer King, Indravar- man III, hints that the misfortunes of the kingdom were due to his aged * Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Historie Routes to Angkor: Development of the Khmer Road System (Ninth to Thirteenth Centuries AD) in Mainland Southeast Asia Mitch Hendrickson*
    Historie routes to Angkor: development of the Khmer road system (ninth to thirteenth centuries AD) in mainland Southeast Asia Mitch Hendrickson* Road systems in the service of empires have long inspired archaeologists and ancient historians alike. Using etymology, textual analysis and Angkor archaeology the author deconstructs the road system of the Khmer, empire builders of early historic Cambodia. Far from being the creation of one king, the road system evolved organically to serve expeditions, pilgrimages Phnom . Penh ù <> and embedded exchange routes over several i centuries. The paper encourages us to regard road networks as a significant topic, worthy of comparative study on a global scale. N 0 ^ 200 Keywords: Cambodia, Khmer, roads, routes, communications Ancient road systems: context and methods of study Investigating the chronology of road systems is complicated by their frequent reuse over long time periods and because they are comprised of multiple archaeological components that range from site to regional scales (e.g. roads, resting places, crossing points, settlements, ceramics). The archaeologist studying road systems must identify and incorporate a variety of available data sets, including historic information, within a framework of operational principles that characterise state-level road building and use. Recent trends in the study of imperial states focus on socio-cultural issues, such as pov^'er and politico-economic organisation (see D'Altroy 1992; Sinopoli 1994; Morrison 2001) and concepts of boundaries ' Department of Archaeology. University af Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia (Email: [email protected]) Received: 28 Au^t 2009; Revised: ¡3 October 2009: Accepted: 12 January 2010 ANTlQUITy84 (2010): 480-496 http://antiquiiy.ac.uk/ant/84/ant840480.htni 480 Mitch Hendrickson (see Morrison 2001; Smith 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Cambogia=Cambodia=Campucea= Kampuchea=Cambodge=Khmer
    CAMBOGIA CAMBOGIA=CAMBODIA=CAMPUCEA= KAMPUCHEA=CAMBODGE=KHMER Roat Kampuchea Regno di Cambogia Phnum Penh=Phnom Penh 400.000 ab. Kmq. 181.035 (178.035)(181.000)(181.040) Compreso Kmq. 3.000 di acque interne Dispute con Tailandia per: - Territorio di Preah Vihear (occupato Cambogia) - Poi Pet Area (occupato Tailandia) - Buri=Prachin Buri Area (occupato Tailandia). Dispute con Vietnam per: - Cocincina Occidentale e altri territori (occupati Vietnam) - alcune isole (occupate Vietnam): - Dak Jerman=Dak Duyt - Dak Dang=Dak Huyt - La Drang Area - Baie=Koh Ta Kiev Island - Milieu=Koh Thmey Island - Eau=Koh Sep Island - Pic=Koh Tonsay Island - Northern Pirates=Koh Po Island Rivendica parte delle Scarborough Shoals (insieme a Cina, Taivan, Vietnam, Corea, Malaisia, Nuova Zelanda). Dispute con Tailandia per acque territoriali. Dispute con Vietnam per acque territoriali. Movimento indipendentista Hmon Chao Fa. Movimento indipendentista Khmer Krom. Ab. 7.650.000---11.700.000 Cambogiani=Cmeri=Khmer (90%) - Cmeri Candali=Khmer Kandal=Cmeri Centrali=Central Khmers (indigeni) - Cmeri Cromi=Khmer Krom (cmeri insediati nella Cambogia SE e nel Vietnam Meridionale) - Cmeri Surini=Khmer Surin (cmeri insediati nella Cambogia NO e nelle province tailandesi di Surin, Buriram, Sisaket - Cmeri Loeu=Cmeri Leu=Khmer Loeu (termine ombrello per designare tutte le tribù collinari della Cambogia)(ca. 100.000 in tutto): - Parlanti il Mon-Cmero=Mon-Khmer (94%) - Cacioco=Kachok - Crungo=Krung - Cui=Kuy - Fnongo=Phnong - Tampuano=Tampuan (nella provincia di Ratanakiri NE)
    [Show full text]
  • Society and Culture of Cambodia in the Angkorian Period Under the Influence of Buddhism
    Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education Vol.12 No. 8 (2021), 2420-2423 Research Article Society and Culture of Cambodia in the Angkorian Period under the influence of Buddhism Phra Ratchawimonmolia, Phra Dhammamolee, (Thongyoo) Drb. Phra Khrupanyasudhammanitesc, Phramaha Yuddhapicharn Thongjunrad, Thanarat Sa-ard-iame a,b,e Department of Buddhist Studies, c Department of Political Science, d Department of Public Administration a,b,c,d,e Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, Surin Campus, Thailand a [email protected], b [email protected], c [email protected], d [email protected], e [email protected] Article History: Received: 10 January 2021; Revised: 12 February 2021; Accepted: 27 March 2021; Published online: 20 April 2021 Abstract: The purposes of this article were 1) to present the society and culture of Cambodia in the Angkorian period, 2) to discover Buddhism in the Angkorian period, and) to analyze the influence of Buddhism on the society and culture of Cambodia in the Angkorian period. This relies on the primary source of data used in the documentary research. The methodology adopted in the study is of a critical and investigative approach to the analysis of data gathered from documentary sources. The result indicated that: ancient Cambodia inherited civilization from India. The ancient Cambodians, therefore, respected both Brahmin and Buddhism. The Cambodian way of life in the Angkorian era was primarily agricultural occupation, and the monarchy was the ultimate leader. Buddhism has spread in Cambodia after the finishing of the 3rd Buddhist Council. The king accepted Buddhism as the Code of conduct and carried on for a period.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Cambodia.Pdf
    Short History of Cambodia 10/3/06 1:57 PM Page i CAMBODIAA SHORT HISTORY OF Short History of Cambodia 10/3/06 1:57 PM Page ii Short History of Asia Series Other books in the series Short History of Bali, Robert Pringle Short History of China and Southeast Asia, Martin Stuart-Fox Short History of Indonesia, Colin Brown Short History of Japan, Curtis Andressen Short History of Laos, Grant Evans Short History of Malaysia, Virginia Matheson Hooker Series Editor Milton Osborne has had an association with the Asian region for over 40 years as an academic, public servant and independent writer. He is the author of many books on Asian topics, including Southeast Asia: An introductory history, first published in 1979 and now in its ninth edition, and The Mekong: Turbulent past, uncertain future, published in 2000. Short History of Cambodia 10/3/06 1:57 PM Page iii A SHORT HISTORY OF CAMBODIA FROM EMPIRE TO SURVIVAL By John Tully Short History of Cambodia 10/3/06 1:57 PM Page iv First published in 2005 by Allen & Unwin Copyright © John Tully 2005 Maps by Ian Faulkner All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. The Australian Copyright Act 1968 (the Act) allows a maximum of one chapter or 10 per cent of this book, whichever is the greater, to be photocopied by any educational institution for its educational purposes provided that the educational institution (or body that administers it) has given a remuneration notice to Copyright Agency Limited (CAL) under the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbolism in City Planning in Cambodia from Angkor to Phnom Penh
    105 Symbolism in City Planning in Cambodia from Angkor to Phnom Penh Martin Stuart-Fox and Paul Reeve ABSTRACT—Phnom Penh was a trading port when Angkor Thom fell to a Siamese army in 1431. Its choice as the site of a new capital for the Kingdom of Cambodia took account of the geographic symbolism of its location, while its urban planning incorporated additional symbolism believed necessary to legitimise royal power. The symbolism evident in the layout of pre-modern Phnom Penh derived from three sources: from Hindu- Buddhist cosmological beliefs that found their mature Khmer expression in Angkor Thom; from beliefs about the legitimisation of royal power in Theravada Buddhism; and from the principles traditionally applied in the design of Tai centres of power. The first rested on correspondences believed to exist between the divine macrocosm and the mundane microcosm. The second emphasized the significance of merit. The third defined a status hierarchy based on the direction of flow of the rivers on which the capitals of Tai polities were always located. City planning was a matter of great concern in all the Indianised kingdoms of Southeast Asia. The location of cities, their orientation and their layout were not decided at the whim of kings: they required the combined talents of the most learned men at court—astrologers, geomancers and court Brahmins well-read in the religious texts of ancient India, notably the treatises known as śāstra on such diverse subjects as law, statecraft and architecture. City planning reflected the way court officials and the kings they served understood the relationship between gods and kings, from which derived royal legitimacy in the eyes of their subjects, along with the power to ensure both economic prosperity and victory over their enemies.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE DATE PERIOD MAJOR RULERS SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS 1900 Protectorate Norodom 1863 Treaty with French Ang Duong Phnom Penh the capital; Vietnamese control of Cambodia 1 1800 Vietnamese annex Delta 1700 Udong the capital 1600 Post-Classic Chai Chettha II Fall of Lovek to the Thai I N T R O D U C T I O N Ang Chan I 1500 1400 Court moves to Quatre Bras region Had the ancient Greeks and Romans known of Angkor, they surely would End of Khmer Empire; Thai invasions have counted that great city as the eighth wonder of the world. When the 1300 Jayavarman VIII Anti-Buddhist iconoclasm French naturalist and explorer Henri Mouhot – to whom was given the honour of first bringing its ruins to the general attention of Europe – entered 1200 Jayavarman VII Angkor Thom; apogee of Khmer Empire Tribhuvanadityavarman Angkor in 1860, he questioned the local people about its origin. Among Suryavarman II Cham invasion of Angkor 1100 Angkor Wat the explanations that they gave him was the suggestion that it might have Classic Udayadityavarman II Phimai been ‘the work of the giants’, leading Mouhot to exclaim: Suryavarman I Baphuon 1000 Rajendravarman II Banteay Srei The work of giants! The expression would be very just, if used 900 Jayavarman IV Yashodharapura the capital; Bakheng figuratively, in speaking of these prodigious works, of which no Hariharalaya the capital Indravarman I Founding of the Khmer Empire one who has not seen them can form any adequate idea; and in the 800 Jayavarman II construction of which patience, strength, and genius appear to have Jayadevi done their utmost in order to leave to future generations proofs of 700 Jayavarman I their power and civilization.1 Bhavavarman II 600 Chitrasena, Almost every early explorer (and virtually every other subsequent visitor) Bhavavarman I Ishanapura (Sambor Prei Kuk) Early Rudravarman has been wonder-struck by the beauty and multiplicity of the sculptures that 500 Kingdoms can be seen everywhere – on lintels and on walls, and free-standing before and within temples.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms
    McDONALD INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms Edited by Norman Yoffee The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms McDONALD INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms Edited by Norman Yoffee with contributions from Tom D. Dillehay, Li Min, Patricia A. McAnany, Ellen Morris, Timothy R. Pauketat, Cameron A. Petrie, Peter Robertshaw, Andrea Seri, Miriam T. Stark, Steven A. Wernke & Norman Yoffee Published by: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge, UK CB2 3ER (0)(1223) 339327 [email protected] www.mcdonald.cam.ac.uk McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2019 © 2019 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 (International) Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ISBN: 978-1-902937-88-5 Cover design by Dora Kemp and Ben Plumridge. Typesetting and layout by Ben Plumridge. Cover image: Ta Prohm temple, Angkor. Photo: Dr Charlotte Minh Ha Pham. Used by permission. Edited for the Institute by James Barrett (Series Editor). Contents Contributors vii Figures viii Tables ix Acknowledgements x Chapter 1 Introducing the Conference: There Are No Innocent Terms 1 Norman Yoffee Mapping the chapters 3 The challenges of fragility 6 Chapter 2 Fragility of Vulnerable Social Institutions in Andean States 9 Tom D. Dillehay & Steven A. Wernke Vulnerability and the fragile state
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeological Parks of Angkor, Roluos, and Banteay Srei Province of Siem Reap Cambodia 22 September 1992 at the Beginning O
    WORLD HERITAGE LIST No 667 ANGKOR IDENTIFICATION Nomination : The archaeological parks of Angkor, Roluos, and Banteay Srei Location . Province of Siem Reap State Partv . Cambodia Date . 22 September 1992 DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY At the beginning of the 9th century AD the two states that covered the territory of modern Cambodia were united by Jayavarman II. who laid the foundations of the Khmer Empire, which was the major power in south-east Asia for nearly five centuries. One of the sites where his court resided for some years was in central Cambodia, to the north of Tonle Sap (The Great Lake), where half a century later Jayavarman’s son, Yashovarman, was to establish Yashodapura, the permanent capital of the Khmer Empire until the 15th century. It was later given the name Angkor (from the Sanskrit “nagara”, meaning city or capital). The first capital was at latter-day Roluos, itself a pre-Angkorian capital, Hariharalaya. This conformed with the classic form of Khmer capital. This comprised certain fundamental elements: a defensive bank and ditch with a state temple at its centre built in brick or stone, and a wooden palace. Leading dignitaries would also build temples, both inside and outside the enceinte, which were dedicated, like the state temple, to Hindu divinities, notably Shiva. There would also have been many secular buildings, constructed almost entirely of wood, in and around the enceinte. The state temple at Roluos, the Bakong, and the temple built in memory of the royal ancestors, Preah Ko, were erected around 880. Another essential feature of a Khmer capital, a large reservoir, was added a decade later, with in its centre a third temple.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Transnational Escape: Migrations of the Khmer and Cham Peoples of Cambodia (1832-2020) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6fv3712c Author Darnell, Ashley Faye Publication Date 2020 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Transnational Escape: Migrations of the Khmer and Cham Peoples of Cambodia (1832-2020) A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Southeast Asian Studies by Ashley Faye Darnell December 2020 Thesis Committee: Dr. Muhamad Ali, Chairperson Dr. David Biggs Dr. Matthew King Copyright by Ashley Faye Darnell 2020 The Thesis of Ashley Faye Darnell is approved: _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the people of the Kingdom of Cambodia, and one person from South Korea, because without their helpful suggestions, guidance, brainstorming, oral history interviews, and input, this master's thesis would not have been possible. I am most indebted to the Khmer people of the Kingdom of Cambodia, particularly my three oral history interviewees, Wath Sawoeng, Thorn Bunthen, and Kheng
    [Show full text]