DOCSLIB.ORG

Policy Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Policy Brief Policy Brief https://www.facebook.com/NECUkraine/ http://neweurope.org.ua/ [email protected] https://twitter.com/NEC_Ukraine https://t.me/n_e_c , 2018 THE TRAPS OF TRANSNISTRIAN SETTLEMENT: HOW DO WE AVOID THEM? Leo Litra, New Europe Center With the conflict in Ukraine, the focus on the breakaway region of Transnistria was not central; however, at the same time, international attention toward the region was maintained due to the war in Ukraine. The self-proclaimed republic is yet another instrument of the Russian policy in the region, which has been continuously used since the beginning of Russian aggression in Ukraine. The most recent example is the Transnistrian KGB operative who organized an attack on the office of Hungarian diaspora in Ukraine meaning to further destabilize complicated relations between Kyiv and Budapest. Looking more broadly, if the settlement of Transnistrian conflict takes place in accordance with the Russian scenario, it would serve as a tool against Ukraine. The status-quo in the Transnistrian region did not change The paper was written within the Think Tank Development Initiative significantly, although the elements maintaining the status-quo for Ukraine (TTDI), carried out by have been evolving. The long-awaited ban of Russian forces the International Renaissance transit through the territory of Ukraine targeting personnel and Foundation in partnership with the Think Tank Fund of the Open weapons supply lines of Russian illegal forces in the separatist Society Initiative for Europe (OSIFE) region has been established in 2015, although it was de-facto with financial support of the Embassy of Sweden in Ukraine. in power since 2012. Additionally, an ambitious program of The views and opinions expressed joint Moldova-Ukraine border and customs checkpoints on the in this paper are those of the Transnistrian perimeter of the Moldovan-Ukrainian border has author and do not necessarily been agreed between Kyiv and Chisinau. The first joint control reflect the position of the Embassy of Sweden in Ukraine, border checkpoint was already established in Cuciurgan in 2017. the International Renaissance The next ones might be established soon, as both Moldovan Foundation, and the Open Society Initiative for Europe (OSIFE). Government and Ukrainian Parliament approved the framework THE TRAPS OF TRANSNISTRIAN SETTLEMENT: how do we avoid them? agreement, which will allow establishing joint means”. Having very complicated relations control checkpoints on the entire Ukraine- with Russia, Plahotniuc jumped into the Moldova border, which includes Transnistrian Transnistrian issue, hoping that it could serve perimeter. The joint border control is a crucial as a bridge in sorting out the conflict with step in moving towards monitoring the Moscow. However, as it turned out later, the migration flows to the region and facilitating progress on Transnistria was rather used to the business activity for entrepreneurs from raise the profile of Moldova with its partners the secessionist region. For instance, before the in the West and improve Chisinau’s relations joint control in Cuciurgan, the entrepreneurs with Brussels and Washington. For this, Vlad from Transnistria had to get clearance and Plahotniuc contributed to signing of five their paperwork done in Chisinau, and now protocols between Moldovan and Tiraspol they can do it at the border checkpoint and administrations after he agreed with Victor skip the burden of going to Chisinau. This Gusan, the head of Sheriff and the de-facto also contributes to the implementation of decision-maker in the region. The five protocols the economic part (DCFTA) of the Association signed in 2017 cover Agreement between the European Union and Moldova. Finally, Moldova knows much better hh(1) apostille by Moldovan Ministry of who enters and leaves its territory, which is Education of diplomas issued by universities important, especially in the context of state in the Transnistrian region; security. hh(2) elimination of barriers in the telecommunication domain that would lead At the same time, 2017 regime change in the to direct connection of fixed, mobile, and Transnistrian region, which brought to power internet networks; the so-called president Vadim Krasnoselski, a hh(3) elimination of barriers to the functioning representative of the Sheriff business group of Romanian language (Latin script) schools that also controls the local parliament, made in Transnistria; the regime more open to negotiations, but not hh(4) allowing farmers to use their lands across to concessions, positioning itself as practical Tiraspol-Camenca road in Dubasari district and business-oriented entity, but still playing (Transnistria); and within the red lines drawn by Russia. Similarly, hh(5) opening of the Gura Bacului bridge over in Moldova, President Igor Dodon, elected Nistru river. in 2016, a broadly ceremonial position, has been actively echoing the Russian narrative In return, although not as a part of any formal in Moldova, which created more confusion agreement, Moldova keeps buying electricity regarding the conflict. from Transnistrian Cuciurgan power station (Moldovan GRES), which is the second contributor The domestic conditions in Moldova have also to Transnistrian budget and a way to cash Russian changed. The Democratic Party led by Vlad funding through natural gas supplies to the Plahotniuc, who has been the main decision- power station. maker for the last four years, has governed Moldova. Vlad Plahotniuc proved to be a Russia’s reaction was generally absent and powerful manager and is often employing the did not help Vlad Plahotniuc. In fact, it helped Machiavellian approach “the end justifies the more his relations with the EU and the US 2 who are enthusiastic about the progress in in Moldova, which is to “to help achieve a the conflict settlement. Less enthusiasm was lasting, comprehensive political settlement of seen among the Moldovan society interested the Transnistrian conflict; and to consolidate in the Transnistrian issue, who warned Moldova’s independence and sovereignty”. that any concessions made by Moldova are legalizing the semi-sovereign attributes of the Since the beginning of Russian aggression in secessionist region. Others reacted to these Ukraine, over one hundred military applications developments more positively and described have been held in Transnistria. The novelty the protocols as practical steps to fix long- of the military applications after aggression lasting issues. Despite signing the protocols, in Ukraine is that Russian occupation troops little was made to implement them, and the in Transnistria (known as GOTR) were also results are yet to come. involved in exercises along with Transnistrian armed forces and Russian peacekeeping In 2003, Russia and Moldova secretly contingent — intimidating Moldova by negotiated a package deal called “Kozak Plan”. imitating crossing the Dniester through The “Kozak Plan” meant, among others, to assembling military bridges across the river. create an asymmetric federation in Moldova In this context, the evident question is how in order to “transnistrisize” Moldova and Russian peacekeepers, who should deter any legalize Russian military presence. As it did military activity in the Security Zone, could not work then, the plan is still on the agenda; oppose Russian occupation forces if they however, it is now split in pieces, which will are conducting joint military applications? get implemented portion by portion under The situation is not only absurd, but also such beautiful names as “small steps” and dangerous. However, at the same time, Russia “confidence building measures”. It is not about is consolidating its role as a party in the the protocols, but about the trend to legalize conflict, from which it tried to distance during elements of Transnistrian “statehood” that the last 20 years, positioning the conflict as will have political consequences in the long- an issue between Moldova and Transnistrian term perspective. However, with Transnistria, region. However, from the legal point, including Vlad Plahotniuc has a chance to prove he is a through decisions of the European Court statesman despite his personal interest and of Human Rights, Russia is responsible for withstand the temptation to set his accounts everything that happens in Transnistria. In with Russia by using Transnistria. this respect, the example of Moldova could be used by Ukraine for defending its positions and The carrying Moldovan society is ready to maybe bring Russia to justice for the crimes in make steps towards compromise in settling ORDLO. the issue, however, not at any cost. The options that imply “compromises” to the detriment of Even more disappointing aspect of the Moldovan independence and sovereignty are military exercises is that the OSCE did not not accepted, as they are unconstitutional. demonstrate any reaction that would condemn Moreover, for some reasons, the OSCE has the escalation in the region. Moreover, the been pushing hard for the last 3 years for OSCE does not have access to Transnistria solutions that undermine both independence and is not able to monitor the violations that and sovereignty, contrary to the OSCE mandate occur there. However, the OSCE mission in 3 THE TRAPS OF TRANSNISTRIAN SETTLEMENT: how do we avoid them? Moldova was quite vocal in informal meetings, than with the settlement of the conflict in advising who should be dismissed from the Transnistria. That is precisely the reason why Government of Moldova and why Ukraine and the OSCE representative for Transnistria is Moldova are wrong. Unlike the OSCE mission seeking progress in resolving the conflict. The in Moldova, which wants to deliver results at apparent progress in certain dossiers of the any cost, the Moldovan Government is willing Transnistrian conflict will be sold to the EU to progress on the settlement without violating member states by Frattini as a Russian gesture the Constitution of Moldova and creating a in favor of diplomacy and Russia’s constructive precedent that would have a negative impact position on fixing the issues in Moldova, but on other conflicts in the region, including certainly not mentioning that it is Russia that the one in Ukraine.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trafficking in Transnistria: the Role of Russia
    Trafficking in Transnistria: The Role of Russia by Kent Harrel SIS Honors Capstone Supervised by Professors Linda Lubrano and Elizabeth Anderson Submitted to the School of International Service American University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with General University Honors Bachelor of Arts Degree May 2009 Abstract After declaring de facto independence from the Republic of Moldova in 1992, the breakaway region of Transnistria became increasingly isolated, and has emerged as a hotspot for weapons and human trafficking. Working from a Realist paradigm, this project assesses the extent to which the Russian government and military abet trafficking in Transnistria, and the way in which Russia uses trafficking as a means to adversely affect Moldova’s designs of broader integration within European spheres. This project proves necessary because the existing scholarship on the topic of Transnistrian trafficking failed to focus on the role of the Russian government and military, and in turn did not account for the ways in which trafficking hinders Moldova’s national interests. The research project utilizes sources such as trafficking policy centers, first-hand accounts, trade agreements, non-governmental organizations, and government documents. A review of the literature employs the use of secondary sources such as scholarly and newspaper articles. In short, this project develops a more comprehensive understanding of Russia’s role in Moldovan affairs and attempts to add a significant work to the existing literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Page | 1 FINAL REPORT June 2019 Project Financed By
    P a g e | 1 ENI – European Neighbourhood Instrument (NEAR) Agreement reference No ENPI/2014/354-587 Increased opportunities and better living conditions across the Nistru/Dniestr River FINAL REPORT June 2019 Project financed by the European Union Final Report Support to Confidence Building Measures, 15 March 2015-31 December 2018 – submitted by UNDP Moldova 1 P a g e | 2 Project Title: Support to Confidence Building Measures Starting date: 15 March 2015 Report end date: 31 December 2018 Implementing agency: UNDP Moldova Country: Republic of Moldova Increased opportunities and better living conditions across the Nistru/Dniestr River ENPI/2014/354-587 Final Report (15 March 2015 - 31 December 2018) – submitted by UNDP Moldova P a g e | 3 Table of Contents I. SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 4 II. CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................ 6 III. PROGRESS UPDATE ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES ..................................................................................... 7 3.2 EMPOWERED COMMUNITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ....................................................................................... 8 IV. KEY RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ST61 Publication
    Section spéciale Index BR IFIC Nº 2534 Special Section ST61/ 1502 Indice Sección especial International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Date/Fecha : 14.12.2004 Date limite pour les commentaires pour Partie A / Expiry date for comments for Part A / fecha limite para comentarios para Parte A : 08.03.2005 Les commentaires doivent être transmis directement Comments should be sent directly to the Administration Las observaciones deberán enviarse directamente a la à l'Administration dont émane la proposition. originating the proposal. Administración que haya formulado la proposición. Description of Columns / Descripción de columnas / Description des colonnes Intent Purpose of the notification Propósito de la notificación Objet de la notification 1a Assigned frequency Frecuencia asignada Fréquence assignée 4a Name of the location of Tx station Nombre del emplazamiento de estación Tx Nom de l'emplacement de la station Tx 4b Geographical area Zona geográfica Zone géographique 4c Geographical coordinates Coordenadas geográficas Coordonnées géographiques 6a Class of station Clase de estación Classe de station 1b Vision / sound frequency Frecuencia de portadora imagen/sonido Fréquence image / son 1ea Frequency stability Estabilidad de frecuencia Stabilité de fréquence
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges in Utilization and Management of Water Resources of the Camenca River Basin in the Context of Intensified Human Impact
    Lucrările Seminarului Geografic Dimitrie Cantemir Vol. 47, Issue 1, October 2019, pp. 75-97 http://dx.doi.org/10.15551/lsgdc.v47i1.04 Article Challenges in utilization and management of water resources of the Camenca river basin in the context of intensified human impact Petru Bacal 1 , Ana Jeleapov 1 1 Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract. This article is dedicated to the evaluation of water use and management of 12 river water bodies delineated in the Camenca river basin – the biggest tributary of the Prut River in the limits of the Republic of Moldova. The study is based on the approaches and methodology proposed by the EU Water Framework Directive and its methodological guidelines as well as on the national normative documents. The present research was conducted as part of the Camenca river basin management plan and constitutes the basis for the development of the Programme of Measures meant to accomplish the environmental objectives established for water bodies. Considering water use problems in the limits of the pilot basin, in the present research several challenges were identified: intensification of climate change and reduction of water supply; reduced accessibility of the population to aqueducts and the lack of public sewerage systems; significant impact of diffuse pollution on agriculture; a large number of reservoirs in improper conditions. With regards to water resources management, the following issues were revealed: incomplete inventory of water resources and frequent cases of unauthorised water use; low prices for water supply and sewerage services as well as for water use and water pollution, which do not cover water use costs and investments in water resources and aquatic ecosystems protection; insufficient and fragmented subventions in water sector; issues regarding legal framework and adequate exploitation regime of reservoirs, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin's Frozen Conflicts and the Conflict in Ukraine
    Antagonizing the Neighborhood: Putin’s Frozen Conflicts and the Conflict in Ukraine Testimony before Subcommittee on Europe, Eurasia, Energy, and the Environment Committee on Foreign Relations United States House of Representatives March 11, 2020 Stephen B. Nix, Esq. Eurasia Regional Director International Republican Institute A nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing democracy worldwide Stephen B. Nix, Esq. Congressional Testimony House Committee on Foreign Affairs March 11, 2020 Chairman Keating, Ranking Member Kinzinger, Members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. The conflicts imposed upon Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova by Vladimir Putin have created military, political and policy challenges in all these countries. In addition to providing factual and political analysis in all the countries, we hope to provide the subcommittee with policy recommendations as to how the U.S. might engage in all these situations. Ukraine – Crimea and Donbas Since assuming office, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has dramatically enhanced his government’s efforts to resolve the crisis posed by the Russian-occupied territories of Donbas and Crimea. In a few short months, the Ukrainian government has increased its level of engagement with Ukrainian citizens still residing in these territories, improved the quality of critical public services to address needs created by the conflict, and re-invigorated diplomatic efforts to increase international pressure on the Kremlin to allow for the reintegration of these territories. It is crucial that the United States does all it can to support the Ukrainian government in achieving these aims. Challenges The conflict has created a humanitarian crisis in Donbas as vital public infrastructure, such as airports, bridges, highways, apartment buildings, and power and water lines have been destroyed or severely damaged.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REPORT on the Implementation of the Convention on The
    THE REPORT on the implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women in the Republic of Moldova The situation in the Transdniestrian region Prepared by: NGO “Center for support and development of civic initiatives “RESONANCE”” NGO “Legal Informational Center “Apriori”” 2013 Content I. Introduction....................................................................................................................................- 3 - II. General analysis of the situation on the status of women in Transdniestrian region of Moldova…...............................................................................................................................................- 4 - III. The situation of domestic violence in Transdniestria...............................................................- 6 - Lack of gender‐disaggregated statistics..............................................................................................- 6 - Lack of domestic violence legislation at the local level in Transdniestria..........................................- 8 - Existing of strong stereotypes towards the place of women and men in the family.......................- 10 - Lack of services for women who suffered from domestic violence .................................................- 11 - IV. Women in labour market.........................................................................................................- 13 - General statistical data .....................................................................................................................-
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report for 2009
    Contract number: 2009/219-955 Project Title: Building confidence between Chisinau and Tiraspol Report starting date: 01 January 2010 Report end date: 31 December 2011 Implementing agency: UNDP Moldova Country: Republic of Moldova Support to Confidence Building Measures II – Final Report 2010-2011 – submitted by UNDP Moldova 1 Table of Contents I. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 II. CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 III. PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 5 1. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3. CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 7 4. SUPPORT TO CREATION OF DNIESTER EUROREGION AND RESTORATION OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC. ........................................... 7 IV. SUMMARY OF IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research Paper Research Division – NATO Defense College, Rome – No
    Research Paper Research Division – NATO Defense College, Rome – No. 122 – December 2015 The Transnistrian Conflict in the Context of the Ukrainian Crisis by Inessa Baban1 Until recently, relatively little was known about the Transnistrian conflict that has been undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Republic of Moldova since the collapse of the Soviet Union. The The Research Division (RD) of the NATO De- fense College provides NATO’s senior leaders with waves of enlargement towards the East of NATO and the European sound and timely analyses and recommendations on current issues of particular concern for the Al- Union drew attention to Transnistria, which has been seen as one of the liance. Papers produced by the Research Division convey NATO’s positions to the wider audience “frozen conflict zones” in the post-Soviet area alongside Abkhazia, South of the international strategic community and con- tribute to strengthening the Transatlantic Link. Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh. However, the Transnistrian issue has The RD’s civil and military researchers come from not been perceived as a serious threat to Euro-Atlantic security because a variety of disciplines and interests covering a broad spectrum of security-related issues. They no outbreaks of large-scale hostilities or human casualties have been conduct research on topics which are of interest to the political and military decision-making bodies reported in the region since the 1990s. Beyond a few small incidents in of the Alliance and its member states. the demilitarized zone, the 1992 ceasefire has been respected for more The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the than two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BENEFITS of ETHNIC WAR Understanding Eurasia's
    v53.i4.524.king 9/27/01 5:18 PM Page 524 THE BENEFITS OF ETHNIC WAR Understanding Eurasia’s Unrecognized States By CHARLES KING* AR is the engine of state building, but it is also good for busi- Wness. Historically, the three have often amounted to the same thing. The consolidation of national states in western Europe was in part a function of the interests of royal leaders in securing sufficient rev- enue for war making. In turn, costly military engagements were highly profitable enterprises for the suppliers of men, ships, and weaponry. The great affairs of statecraft, says Shakespeare’s Richard II as he seizes his uncle’s fortune to finance a war, “do ask some charge.” The distinc- tion between freebooter and founding father, privateer and president, has often been far murkier in fact than national mythmaking normally allows. Only recently, however, have these insights figured in discussions of contemporary ethnic conflict and civil war. Focused studies of the me- chanics of warfare, particularly in cases such as Sudan, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, have highlighted the complex economic incentives that can push violence forward, as well as the ways in which the easy labels that analysts use to identify such conflicts—as “ethnic” or “religious,” say—always cloud more than they clarify.1 Yet how precisely does the chaos of war become transformed into networks of profit, and how in turn can these informal networks harden into the institutions of states? Post-Soviet Eurasia provides an enlightening instance of these processes in train. In the 1990s a half dozen small wars raged across the region, a series of armed conflicts that future historians might term collectively the * The author would like to thank three anonymous referees for comments on an earlier draft of this article and Lori Khatchadourian, Nelson Kasfir, Christianne Hardy Wohlforth, Chester Crocker, and Michael Brown for helpful conversations.
    [Show full text]
  • 'People's Republics' of the Donbas a Research Into the Origins, Structure and Patronage of the Donetsk and Lu
    Defining the ‘People’s Republics’ of the Donbas A research into the origins, structure and patronage of the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics Master Thesis in Russian and Eurasian Studies Leiden University By Maurits Foorthuis Supervisor: Dr. M. Bader December 9th, 2019 Word count: 19,619 words the mushrooms of Donbas, silent chimeras of the night, emerging out of the emptiness, growing out of hard coal, till hearts stand still, like elevators in buildings at night, the mushrooms of Donbas grow and grow, never letting the discouraged and condemned die of grief, because, man, as long as we’re together, there’s someone to dig up this earth, and find in its warm innards, the black stuff of death the black stuff of life. Serhiy Zhadan, 2007 2 Table of contents Introduction 4 Chapter 1: Terms relevant to the DPR and the LPR 7 Chapter 2: Chronological overview of the conflict in the Donbas 17 Chapter 3: ‘State-building’ in the DPR and the LPR 22 Chapter 4: Protectorate 26 Chapter 5: Client State 32 Chapter 6: Associated State 36 Chapter 7: Vassal State 39 Chapter 8: Puppet State 42 Conclusion 50 Appendix 1: Situation map of the Donbas 52 Bibliography 53 3 Introduction In November 2013, then Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the European Union after being pressured by Russian President Vladimir Putin. As a result of Yanukovych’ refusal to sign, students flocked to the Independence Square in Kyiv, better known as the Maidan Nezalezhnosti, to protest his decision. The students were later joined by ordinary Ukrainians, who protested in favor of a better relationship with the European Union and the West in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova and the Transnistrian Conflict
    Chapter 4 Moldova and the Transnistrian Conflict Marius Vahl and Michael Emerson The Transnistrian conflict emerged with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s. The two sides have been unable to agree on any of the proposals tabled by the international mediators, Russia, Ukraine and the OSCE. The EU played a negligible role during the first decade of the Transnistrian conflict, but has recently become more engaged. This was preceded by a growing emphasis on the EU and Europeanization in Moldovan political discourse. Disillusionment with the negotiating format has grown in Moldova, increasing support for Europeanization of Moldova independently of the settlement of the conflict. The EU engagement has led to a growing resentment towards the EU in Transnistrian political discourse. Differences among the major external actors have become more pronounced, with Russia disapproving of the ‘interference’ of the West and the growing engagement of the EU. 4.1 A brief history of Moldova1 Moldova traces its roots to the Principality of Moldova established in the late Middle Ages. Centred in present-day Romania to the northwest of today’s Moldova, the Principality reached its peak during the 15th century, before becoming a vassal state of the Ottomans in the early 16th century. Moldova was never fully incorporated into the Ottoman Empire. Its vassal status was withdrawn and Greek administrators were appointed in the early 18th century, following anti-Ottoman insurrections. The revolt was supported by the expanding Russian empire, which reached the Nistru river in the late 18th century.2 In 1806, Russia invaded the Eastern part of the Principality known as Bessarabia, an annexation accepted by the Ottomans in 1812.3 The rump Moldovan principality on the west side of the Prut, in present-day Romania, remained part of the Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • To View the Report
    Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l Avenue d’Auderghem 61/16, 1040 Brussels Phone/Fax: 32 2 3456145 Email: [email protected] – Website : http://www.hrwf.eu The Donetsk People’s Republic and some EU blacklisted leaders Who is who ? By Willy Fautré April 2015 The self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and Luhansk People’s Republic (LPR) were formed on 11 May 2014 on the territory of Donbass (Donetsk and Luhansk regions in Ukraine’s southeastern industrial area) after referendums that were not recognized by the Ukrainian government and the international community. In response, Kiev started a military operation. The first Minsk Peace Agreement signed on 5 September provided that the warring parties would agree . to pull heavy weaponry 15 km by each side from the line of contact, creating a 30 km security zone . to ban offensive operations . to ban flights by combat aircraft over the security zone . to set up an OSCE monitoring mission . to withdraw all foreign mercenaries from the conflict zone but this did not stop the war and further territorial expansion of the separatists. In September 2014, the self-proclaimed republics unilaterally adopted laws on elections of the republics’ heads and deputies of people’s councils despite the opposition of the central government in Kyiv. On the whole, 2.2 million people live in the Luhansk Region, and 4.3 million people reside in the Donetsk Region. The share of Russians in the population reaches 39-40% Both territories are centers of the coal, metallurgical and mechanical engineering industries. Some EU-sanctioned separatist leaders and figures The first DPR political leader was Alexander Borodai, a Russian citizen, from Moscow.
    [Show full text]