Maradannualreport2000.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maradannualreport2000.Pdf mHRHD '00 July 2001 U.S. Department of Transportation Norman Y. Mineta Secretary Maritime Administration Bruce J. Carlton Acting Deputy Maritime Administrator Headquarters 400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20590 j Contents Introduction . V Philadelphia Agile Port Study . 26 Public Port Financing . 26 Chapter 1-National Security . 1 Port Capital Expenditures . 26 Maritime Security Program (MSP) . 1 Deep-draft . 26 Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement (VISA) . 2 Inland Shallow-draft . 26 MSPIVISA Linkages . 2 Risk Management . 26 National Defense Reserve Fleet (NDRF) ................ 3 Port Readiness . 27 Ready Reserve Force (RRF) ..................... , . 3 Port and Cargo Security . 27 RRF Sea Trial and Dock Trial Program . 3 RRF Operations ............................ , . 4 Technical Assistance to Foreign Ports Training . 27 Logistics Support . 4 National Port Security Strategy Development . 27 RRF Roll/Roll-off Capacity Upgrade Program . 5 American Committee on Ports . 27 RRF Special Mission Ships . 5 Inter-American Committee on Ports (CIP) . 27 Auxiliary Crane (T-ACS) Ships ....................... 5 International Port Assessments . 27 Offshore Petroleum Discharge Systems (OPDS) Tankers 5 MARINE INTERMODAL: Tankers .......................................... 5 Freight Transportation!Intermodal System . 28 Sea Barge Clipper (SEABEE) Ships . 5 Departmental and DOT Agency Initiatives . 28 LASH Vessels . 5 Technical Assistance . 29 Sealift Enhancement Features (SEF) . 5 ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES: Aviation Logistics Support Ships (T-AVB) ............... 6 Dredging . 29 State Maritime Academy Schoolship Maintenance and Repair (M&R) Program ............................. 6 Environmental Compliance and Compliance Management 30 Scrapping or Disposal of Obsolete Vessels . 6 Environmental Standards . 30 War Risk Insurance ................................ 6 Industry Support . 31 RRF Claims Settlement . 7 Title XI and Other Insurance Compliance ................7 Chapter 4-Domestic Operations Emergency Operations . 7 Piracy and Attacks on Merchant Shipping . 7 Marine Transportation System Initiative (MTS) . 33 An Assessment of the U.S. Marine Transportation System 33 Chapter 2-Shipbuilding and Ship Conversion Implementation of MTS Recommendations . 33 Significant Activities . 34 SHIPBUILDING INITIATIVES: Technical Assistance . 34 Title XI Guarantees . 13 Rural Transportation Initiative . 34 MARITECH . 13 Jones Act ....................................... 34 MARAD MARITECH Projects . 13 Assistance for Shippers . 35 MARITECH Advanced Shipbuilding Enterprise . 14 Small Passenger Vessel Waiver Authority . 35 National Maritime Resource and Education Center (NMREC) . 14 Industry Trends and Profile . 35 Capital Construction Fund . 14 Inland Waterways . 35 Construction Reserve Fund ......................... 15 Shipyard Activity . 15 Upper Mississippi River/Illinois Waterway Navigation Shipyard Improvements . 15 Study ...................................... 36 One DOT Marine Related Activities .................. 15 Deep-sea . 36 Offshore Oil Support... 36 Chapter 3-Port, Intermodal, and Ferry Services ................................. 36 Environmental Activities PORT: GREAT LAKES: Port Economic Impact Models . 25 Marine Transportation System . 36 Port Facility Conveyance Program . 25 Maritime Promotion ............................. 37 CCDoTT ....................................... 25 Environmental Issues ............................ 37 MARAD '00 --- - -------- Chapter 5-Ship Operations Chapter 8-International Activities U.S.-Flag Fleet Profile ............................. 39 Maritime Agreement with Brazil . 65 Operating-Differential Subsidy ...................... 39 Administrator Holds Negotiations in China ............. 65 Subsidy Rates . 39 Maritime Talks in Korea . 65 Section 804 Activities . 39 Pressing for Open Ports in Japan . 65 Foreign Transfers . 40 Shipping and the World Trade Organization (WTO) . 66 Ship Operations Cooperative Program (SOCP) . 40 International Transportation Symposium . 66 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) ...................................... 66 Chapter 6-Cargo Preference Preference Cargo . 51 Chapter 9-Administration Cargo Preference Act of 1954 . 51 Strategic Planning . 67 Cargo Preference Act of 1904 . 51 Maritime Subsidy Board . 67 The Maritime Security Act of 1996 . 51 Customer Satisfaction Program... 67 Public Resolution 17 of the 73rd Congress . 51 LEGAL SERVICES AND AGENCY DECISIONS: CIVILIAN AGENCIES: FOIAs ........................................ 68 Israeli Cash Transfer . 51 Shipbuilding Related Activities . 68 Export-Import Bank (EXIMBANK) ................. 51 Litigation . 68 Strategic Petroleum Reserve ..........................52 Rulemaking . 69 Military Cargoes . 52 Maritime Assistance ..............................69 DOD SERVICES AND AGENCIES Legislation . 69 Defense Security Cooperation Agency . 52 Information Resources Management . 70 Safety Program . 70 Air Force . 53 Personnel . 70 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ..................... 53 Defense Logistics Agency . 53 INSTALLATIONS AND LOGISTICS: Navy/Marine Corps ............................. 53 Real Property . 71 Agricultural Cargoes . 53 Audits: FY 2000 ............................... 71 Title I ........................................ 53 Office of the Inspector General . 71 Title II ....................................... 53 General Accounting Office ........................ 71 Title III . 53 Accounting . 71 Section 416b .................................. 53 Maritime Administration Organization Chart . 72 Food for Progress . 53 Maritime Administration Field Organization Chart . 73 Ocean Freight Differential (OFD)... ................. 54 Minimum Tonnage . 54 Financial Statements: Fair and Reasonable Rates . 54 Exhibit 1: Statement of Financial Condition September 30, 2000 ............................ 74 Chapter 7-Maritime Labor, Training, and Safety Exhibit 2: Statement of Operations September 30, 2000 . 76 U.S. Merchant Marine Academy ..................... 61 Notes to Financial Statements . 77 State Academies ................................. 61 Appendices Supplemental Training . 62 I: Maritime Subsidy Outlays--1937-2000 .............. 78 Garrett A. Morgan Technology and Transportation Futures II: Combined Financial Statements of Companies Program .................................... 62 with ODS ................................... 79 Merchant Marine Awards . 62 III: Studies and Reports Released in FY 2000 . 80 Labor ........................................ 62 Annual Crewing Assessment of U.S. Merchant Mariners . 62 Charts Longshore . 63 1: Maritime Security Program Participants as of Safety ....................................... 63 Sept. 30, 2000 . 1 MARAD '00 ii 2: VISA Participants as of Sept. 30, 2000 ................ 2 6: Worldwide Ship Deliveries-Calendar Year 2000 . 22 3: MSP Participants as of September 30, 2000 .......... 11 7: Capital Construction Fund Holders-September 30, 4: Major Commercial New Construction on 2000 ...................................... 23 Order as of September 30, 2000 . 19 8: Construction Reserve Fund Holders-September 30, 2000 ...................................... 24 5: U.S. Port Capital Expenditures for 1999 (Thousands of Dollars) ................................... 26 9: Cargo-Carrying U.S.-Flag Fleet by Area of Operation As of July 1, 2000 . 42 6: U.S. Port Capital Expenditures Projected for 2000-2004 (Thousands of Dollars) ......................... 26 10: U.S.-Flag Fleet of Passenger Vessels, Tugs/Towboats, and Other Work Boats As of July 1, 2000 .......... 43 Figures 11: Major Merchant Fleets of the World-July 1, 2000 . 44 1: Commercial Shipbuilding Orderbook (1,000 GT and 12: U.S. Waterborne Commerce ..................... 45 Over) September 30, 2000 ....................... 16 13: ODS Accruals and Outlays-January 1, 1937 to 2: Commercial Shipbuilding Orderbook History (As of September 30, 2000 . 46 September 30, 2000) . 17 14: ODS Accruals and Outlays by Shipping Lines- 3: Capital Investments (U.S. Shipbuilding and.
Recommended publications
  • Aircraft Collection
    A, AIR & SPA ID SE CE MU REP SEU INT M AIRCRAFT COLLECTION From the Avenger torpedo bomber, a stalwart from Intrepid’s World War II service, to the A-12, the spy plane from the Cold War, this collection reflects some of the GREATEST ACHIEVEMENTS IN MILITARY AVIATION. Photo: Liam Marshall TABLE OF CONTENTS Bombers / Attack Fighters Multirole Helicopters Reconnaissance / Surveillance Trainers OV-101 Enterprise Concorde Aircraft Restoration Hangar Photo: Liam Marshall BOMBERS/ATTACK The basic mission of the aircraft carrier is to project the U.S. Navy’s military strength far beyond our shores. These warships are primarily deployed to deter aggression and protect American strategic interests. Should deterrence fail, the carrier’s bombers and attack aircraft engage in vital operations to support other forces. The collection includes the 1940-designed Grumman TBM Avenger of World War II. Also on display is the Douglas A-1 Skyraider, a true workhorse of the 1950s and ‘60s, as well as the Douglas A-4 Skyhawk and Grumman A-6 Intruder, stalwarts of the Vietnam War. Photo: Collection of the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum GRUMMAN / EASTERNGRUMMAN AIRCRAFT AVENGER TBM-3E GRUMMAN/EASTERN AIRCRAFT TBM-3E AVENGER TORPEDO BOMBER First flown in 1941 and introduced operationally in June 1942, the Avenger became the U.S. Navy’s standard torpedo bomber throughout World War II, with more than 9,836 constructed. Originally built as the TBF by Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation, they were affectionately nicknamed “Turkeys” for their somewhat ungainly appearance. Bomber Torpedo In 1943 Grumman was tasked to build the F6F Hellcat fighter for the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of the Navy's New Frigate
    OCTOBER 2020 The Cost of the Navy’s New Frigate On April 30, 2020, the Navy awarded Fincantieri Several factors support the Navy’s estimate: Marinette Marine a contract to build the Navy’s new sur- face combatant, a guided missile frigate long designated • The FFG(X) is based on a design that has been in as FFG(X).1 The contract guarantees that Fincantieri will production for many years. build the lead ship (the first ship designed for a class) and gives the Navy options to build as many as nine addi- • Little if any new technology is being developed for it. tional ships. In this report, the Congressional Budget Office examines the potential costs if the Navy exercises • The contractor is an experienced builder of small all of those options. surface combatants. • CBO estimates the cost of the 10 FFG(X) ships • An independent estimate within the Department of would be $12.3 billion in 2020 (inflation-adjusted) Defense (DoD) was lower than the Navy’s estimate. dollars, about $1.2 billion per ship, on the basis of its own weight-based cost model. That amount is Other factors suggest the Navy’s estimate is too low: 40 percent more than the Navy’s estimate. • The costs of all surface combatants since 1970, as • The Navy estimates that the 10 ships would measured per thousand tons, were higher. cost $8.7 billion in 2020 dollars, an average of $870 million per ship. • Historically the Navy has almost always underestimated the cost of the lead ship, and a more • If the Navy’s estimate turns out to be accurate, expensive lead ship generally results in higher costs the FFG(X) would be the least expensive surface for the follow-on ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Boats Built at Toledo, Ohio Including Monroe, Michigan
    Boats Built at Toledo, Ohio Including Monroe, Michigan A Comprehensive Listing of the Vessels Built from Schooners to Steamers from 1810 to the Present Written and Compiled by: Matthew J. Weisman and Paula Shorf National Museum of the Great Lakes 1701 Front Street, Toledo, Ohio 43605 Welcome, The Great Lakes are not only the most important natural resource in the world, they represent thousands of years of history. The lakes have dramatically impacted the social, economic and political history of the North American continent. The National Museum of the Great Lakes tells the incredible story of our Great Lakes through over 300 genuine artifacts, a number of powerful audiovisual displays and 40 hands-on interactive exhibits including the Col. James M. Schoonmaker Museum Ship. The tales told here span hundreds of years, from the fur traders in the 1600s to the Underground Railroad operators in the 1800s, the rum runners in the 1900s, to the sailors on the thousand-footers sailing today. The theme of the Great Lakes as a Powerful Force runs through all of these stories and will create a lifelong interest in all who visit from 5 – 95 years old. Toledo and the surrounding area are full of early American History and great places to visit. The Battle of Fallen Timbers, the War of 1812, Fort Meigs and the early shipbuilding cities of Perrysburg and Maumee promise to please those who have an interest in local history. A visit to the world-class Toledo Art Museum, the fine dining along the river, with brew pubs and the world famous Tony Packo’s restaurant, will make for a great visit.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Survey of U.S. Shipbuilding and Repair Facilities 2001
    Report on Survey of U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime U.S. Shipbuilding and Administration Repair Facilities 2001 REPORT ON SURVEY OF U.S. SHIPBUILDING AND REPAIR FACILITIES 2001 Prepared By: Office of Shipbuilding and Marine Technology December 2001 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Overview of Major Shipbuilding and Repair Base ................................................ 5 Major U.S. Private Shipyards Summary Classification Definitions ....................... 6 Number of Shipyards by Type (Exhibit 1) ........................................................... 7 Number of Shipyards by Region (Exhibit 2) ........................................................ 8 Number of Shipyards by Type and Region (Exhibit 3) ........................................ 9 Number of Building Positions by Maximum Length Capability (Exhibit 4) ........... 10 Number of Build and Repair Positions (Exhibit 5) ............................................... 11 Number of Build and Repair Positions by Region (Exhibit 6) .............................. 12 Number of Floating Drydocks by Maximum Length Capability (Exhibit 7) .......... 13 Number of Production Workers by Shipyard Type (Exhibit 8) ............................. 14 Number of Production Workers by Region (Exhibit 9) ........................................ 15 Number of Production Workers: 1982 – 2001 (Exhibit 10) ................................. 16 Listing
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the William A. Baker Collection
    Guide to The William A. Baker Collection His Designs and Research Files 1925-1991 The Francis Russell Hart Nautical Collections of MIT Museum Kurt Hasselbalch and Kara Schneiderman © 1991 Massachusetts Institute of Technology T H E W I L L I A M A . B A K E R C O L L E C T I O N Papers, 1925-1991 First Donation Size: 36 document boxes Processed: October 1991 583 plans By: Kara Schneiderman 9 three-ring binders 3 photograph books 4 small boxes 3 oversized boxes 6 slide trays 1 3x5 card filing box Second Donation Size: 2 Paige boxes (99 folders) Processed: August 1992 20 scrapbooks By: Kara Schneiderman 1 box of memorabilia 1 portfolio 12 oversize photographs 2 slide trays Access The collection is unrestricted. Acquisition The materials from the first donation were given to the Hart Nautical Collections by Mrs. Ruth S. Baker. The materials from the second donation were given to the Hart Nautical Collections by the estate of Mrs. Ruth S. Baker. Copyright Requests for permission to publish material or use plans from this collection should be discussed with the Curator of the Hart Nautical Collections. Processing Processing of this collection was made possible through a grant from Mrs. Ruth S. Baker. 2 Guide to The William A. Baker Collection T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Biographical Sketch ..............................................................................................................4 Scope and Content Note .......................................................................................................5 Series Listing
    [Show full text]
  • 'Liberty'cargo Ship
    ‘LIBERTY’ CARGO SHIP FEATURE ARTICLE written by James Davies for KEY INFORMATION Country of Origin: United States of America Manufacturers: Alabama Dry Dock Co, Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyards Inc, California Shipbuilding Corp, Delta Shipbuilding Co, J A Jones Construction Co (Brunswick), J A Jones Construction Co (Panama City), Kaiser Co, Marinship Corp, New England Shipbuilding Corp, North Carolina Shipbuilding Co, Oregon Shipbuilding Corp, Permanente Metals Co, St Johns River Shipbuilding Co, Southeastern Shipbuilding Corp, Todd Houston Shipbuilding Corp, Walsh-Kaiser Co. Major Variants: General cargo, tanker, collier, (modifications also boxed aircraft transport, tank transport, hospital ship, troopship). Role: Cargo transport, troop transport, hospital ship, repair ship. Operated by: United States of America, Great Britain, (small quantity also Norway, Belgium, Soviet Union, France, Greece, Netherlands and other nations). First Laid Down: 30th April 1941 Last Completed: 30th October 1945 Units: 2,711 ships laid down, 2,710 entered service. Released by WW2Ships.com USA OTHER SHIPS www.WW2Ships.com FEATURE ARTICLE 'Liberty' Cargo Ship © James Davies Contents CONTENTS ‘Liberty’ Cargo Ship ...............................................................................................................1 Key Information .......................................................................................................................1 Contents.....................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • SSHSA Ephemera Collections Drawer Company/Line Ship Date Examplesshsa Line
    Brochure Inventory - SSHSA Ephemera Collections Drawer Company/Line Ship Date ExampleSSHSA line A1 Adelaide S.S. Co. Moonta Admiral, Azure Seas, Emerald Seas, A1 Admiral Cruises, Inc. Stardancer 1960-1992 Enotria, Illiria, San Giorgio, San Marco, Ausonia, Esperia, Bernina,Stelvio, Brennero, Barletta, Messsapia, Grimani,Abbazia, S.S. Campidoglio, Espresso Cagliari, Espresso A1 Adriatica Livorno, corriere del est,del sud,del ovest 1949-1985 A1 Afroessa Lines Paloma, Silver Paloma 1989-1990 Alberni Marine A1 Transportation Lady Rose 1982 A1 Airline: Alitalia Navarino 1981 Airline: American A1 Airlines (AA) Volendam, Fairsea, Ambassador, Adventurer 1974 Bahama Star, Emerald Seas, Flavia, Stweard, Skyward, Southward, Federico C, Carla C, Boheme, Italia, Angelina Lauro, Sea A1 Airline: Delta Venture, Mardi Gras 1974 Michelangelo, Raffaello, Andrea, Franca C, Illiria, Fiorita, Romanza, Regina Prima, Ausonia, San Marco, San Giorgio, Olympia, Messapia, Enotria, Enricco C, Dana Corona, A1 Airline: Pan Am Dana Sirena, Regina Magna, Andrea C 1974 A1 Alaska Cruises Glacier Queen, Yukon Star, Coquitlam 1957-1962 Aleutian, Alaska, Yukon, Northwestern, A1 Alaska Steamship Co. Victoria, Alameda 1930-1941 A1 Alaska Ferry Malaspina, Taku, Matanuska, Wickersham 1963-1989 Cavalier, Clipper, Corsair, Leader, Sentinel, Prospector, Birgitte, Hanne, Rikke, Susanne, Partner, Pegasus, Pilgrim, Pointer, Polaris, Patriot, Pennant, Pioneer, Planter, Puritan, Ranger, Roamer, Runner Acadia, Saint John, Kirsten, Elin Horn, Mette Skou, Sygna, A1 Alcoa Steamship Co. Ferncape,
    [Show full text]
  • Award Winners (Information and Photos Published in Powerships Issue #275 and #276 and Steamboat Bill Issue #245)
    Created and Compiled by: Jillian Fulda The Dibner Intern 2010 Award Winners (Information and photos published in PowerShips issue #275 and #276 and Steamboat Bill issue #245) C. Bradford Mitchell Award-2010 This award was given to Christopher Winters in recognition of his publication Centennial: Steaming Through the American Century. This full color book documents and chronicles the history of the freighter St. Mary’s Challenger. In April 2006, St. Mary’s Challenger became the first Great Lakes ship to reach 100 years of age and still in operational service. Mr. Winters, a marine photographer, spent five seasons capturing this vessel for the SSHSA photo. book. Thanks to him, the future of maritime history will always have a record of this historic vessel. H. Graham Wood Award-2010 This award was given to Francis J. Duffy in recognition of his contributions and work with SSHSA, with strong emphasis on recording and preserving the legacy of ships, New York shipping and the United States Merchant Marine. Mr. Duffy, who grew up in New York, is a professional writer and photographer specializing in the maritime industry. He was a special correspondent for the publication The National Fisherman and from 1984 to 1993 he served as director of public relations for Moran Towing & Transportation Company, where he was also editor of Moran’s Tow Line magazine. Mr. Duffy is also a principal in Granard Associates, a firm serving the maritime industry. With William H. Miller, Mr. Duffy co- authored The New York Harbor Book. Various articles and photographs by him have appeared in The New York Times, Journal of Commerce, Photo published in Steamboat Bill issue Long Island Newsday, Cruise Travel, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I - Updated Estimate Of
    Part I - Updated Estimate of Fair Market Value of the S.S. Keewatin in September 2018 05 October 2018 Part I INDEX PART I S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE SEPTEMBER 2018 SCHEDULE A – UPDATED MUSEUM SHIPS SCHEDULE B – UPDATED COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES DESKTOP VALUATION CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE C – UPDATED VALUATION REPORT ON MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT AND RELATED ASSETS SCHEDULE D – LETTER FROM BELLEHOLME MANAGEMENT INC. PART II S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE NOVEMBER 2017 SCHEDULE 1 – SHIPS LAUNCHED IN 1907 SCHEDULE 2 – MUSEUM SHIPS APPENDIX 1 – JUSTIFICATION FOR OUTSTANDING SIGNIFICANCE & NATIONAL IMPORTANCE OF S.S. KEEWATIN 1907 APPENDIX 2 – THE NORTH AMERICAN MARINE, INC. REPORT OF INSPECTION APPENDIX 3 – COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES INDEPENDENT VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 4 – CULTURAL PERSONAL PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 5 – BELLEHOME MANAGEMENT INC. 5 October 2018 The RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation 311 Talbot Street PO Box 189 Port McNicoll, ON L0K 1R0 Ladies & Gentlemen We are pleased to enclose an Updated Valuation Report, setting out, at September 2018, our Estimate of Fair Market Value of the Museum Ship S.S. Keewatin, which its owner, Skyline (Port McNicoll) Development Inc., intends to donate to the RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation (the “Foundation”). It is prepared to accompany an application by the Foundation for the Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board. This Updated Valuation Report, for the reasons set out in it, estimates the Fair Market Value of a proposed donation of the S.S. Keewatin to the Foundation at FORTY-EIGHT MILLION FOUR HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($48,475,000) and the effective date is the date of this Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents
    Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents Background This ships list is intended to provide VA regional offices with a resource for determining whether a particular US Navy or Coast Guard Veteran of the Vietnam era is eligible for the presumption of Agent Orange herbicide exposure based on operations of the Veteran’s ship. According to 38 CFR § 3.307(a)(6)(iii), eligibility for the presumption of Agent Orange exposure requires that a Veteran’s military service involved “duty or visitation in the Republic of Vietnam” between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975. This includes service within the country of Vietnam itself or aboard a ship that operated on the inland waterways of Vietnam. However, this does not include service aboard a large ocean- going ship that operated only on the offshore waters of Vietnam, unless evidence shows that a Veteran went ashore. Inland waterways include rivers, canals, estuaries, and deltas. They do not include open deep-water bays and harbors such as those at Da Nang Harbor, Qui Nhon Bay Harbor, Nha Trang Harbor, Cam Ranh Bay Harbor, Vung Tau Harbor, or Ganh Rai Bay. These are considered to be part of the offshore waters of Vietnam because of their deep-water anchorage capabilities and open access to the South China Sea. In order to promote consistent application of the term “inland waterways”, VA has determined that Ganh Rai Bay and Qui Nhon Bay Harbor are no longer considered to be inland waterways, but rather are considered open water bays.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress
    Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Updated October 29, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS22478 Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Summary Names for Navy ships traditionally have been chosen and announced by the Secretary of the Navy, under the direction of the President and in accordance with rules prescribed by Congress. Rules for giving certain types of names to certain types of Navy ships have evolved over time. There have been exceptions to the Navy’s ship-naming rules, particularly for the purpose of naming a ship for a person when the rule for that type of ship would have called for it to be named for something else. Some observers have perceived a breakdown in, or corruption of, the rules for naming Navy ships. Section 1749 of the FY2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (S. 1790/P.L. 116-92 of December 20, 2019) prohibits the Secretary of Defense, in naming a new ship (or other asset) or renaming an existing ship (or other asset), from giving the asset a name that refers to, or includes a term referring to, the Confederate States of America, including any name referring to a person who served or held leadership within the Confederacy, or a Confederate battlefield victory. The provision also states that “nothing in this section may be construed as requiring a Secretary concerned to initiate a review of previously named assets.” Section 1749 of the House-reported FY2021 NDAA (H.R. 6395) would prohibit the public display of the Confederate battle flag on Department of Defense (DOD) property, including naval vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • TELESCOPE March-April, 1967 Volume 16, No
    TELESCOPE March-April, 1967 Volume 16, No. 3&4 bKBJ i Great Lakes Maritime Institute Dossin Great Lakes Museum, Belle Isle, Detroit 7, Michigan Having reached the respectability of a fifth edi­ Our first issue of Seaway Salties was prepared by tion, our Seaway Salties feature has cumulatively Donald Baut of Detroit for Telescope of May, grown into a useful body of in format ion on ocean 1962, containing only the List ‘A ”, describing ships visiting the lakes each season. The five ocean visitors for the seasons of 1959 to 1961; Seaway issues offer a body of in format ion not thus our List “A ” is complete back to the opening available elsewhere; the ship regi sters of ocean of the Seaway. George Ayoub of Ottawa contri­ vessels do not distinguish which vessels have a buted the List “ B ” beginning in our second Seaway lake history. issue, for Telescope of May, 1963, covering the In sizing up the value of these 1962 season. Two other Seaway issues were pub­ Seaway issues, we have had to choose between a lished in September, 1964 (for 1963), and May, list published as close as possible to the end of 1966 (for 1964). In all of these issues, the the shipping season in question, and one which is photographs of Emory Massman have been a popular as complete and accurate a record as possible . feature for the List “A ”. That there are not We have given preference to the latter, not only more of his pictures in this issue is due to an for the length of time it takes to produce a list ,<editorial mistake of ordering views from the 1966 such as this.
    [Show full text]