San Miguel Island Trail Guide Timhaufphotography.Com Exploring San Miguel Island
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 54 (2019) 235–253
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 54 (2019) 235–253 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Anthropological Archaeology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jaa Technological change and interior settlement on western Santa Rosa Island, T California ⁎ Christopher S. Jazwa , Richard L. Rosencrance Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: We use data on site distributions, chronology, and artifact assemblages from a large, fat upland landscape on Site chronology Santa Rosa Island to better understand the relationship between coastal and interior settlement patterns on Coastal archaeology California’s northern Channel Islands. This region, Pocket Field, was an important hub of occupation during the Mobility patterns late Pleistocene/early Holocene (before 7550 cal BP) and throughout the late Holocene (3600–168 cal BP). A Territoriality radiocarbon chronology for the region suggests that settlement patterns are consistent with what has been Artifact typologies observed in coastal locations, with an increase in site density throughout the late Holocene. Groundstone is an Medieval climatic anomaly important component of the late Holocene archaeological record, although it decreases in importance following the droughts of the Medieval Climatic Anomaly (MCA; 1150–600 cal BP). Olivella biplicata shell bead production at dense midden sites indicates that occupation of the region was not just for access to terrestrial resources. An increase in sites with projectile points during the MCA may refect an increase in interpersonal violence and indicate that increasing territoriality that occurred on the coast may have extended into the island interior. Our study demonstrates that interior sites were integral components of island settlement and subsistence patterns, even when diet is heavily marine-oriented. -
Private Boating and Boater Activities in the Channel Islands: a Spatial Analysis and Assessment
CALIFORNIA MARINE RECREATION Catamaran at anchor, Coches Prietos anchorage Private Boating and Boater Activities in the Channel Islands: A spatial analysis and assessment FINAL REPORT Prepared for: The Resources Legacy Fund Foundation (RLFF) The National Marine Sanctuary Program (NMSP) Prepared by: Chris LaFranchi1 Linwood Pendleton2 March 2008 1 Founder, NaturalEquity (www.naturalequity.org) Social Science Coordinator, Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary (CINMS) Email: [email protected] 2 Senior Fellow and Director of Economic Research The Ocean Foundation, Dir. Coastal Ocean Values Center Adjunct Associate Professor, UCLA www.coastalvalues.org Email: [email protected] Acknowledgments Of the many individuals who contributed to this effort, we thank Bob Leeworthy, Ryan Vaughn, Miwa Tamanaha, Allison Chan, Erin Gaines, Erin Myers, Dennis Carlson, Alexandra Brown, the captain and crew of the research vessel Shearwater, volunteers from the Sanctuary’s Naturalist Corps, Susie Williams, Christy Loper, Peter Black, and the man boaters who volunteered their time during focus group meetings and survey pre-test efforts. 2 Contents Page 1. Summary……………………………. ……………………………….. 4 2. Introduction …………………………………………………………... 18 2.1. The Study ………………………….…………………………….. 18 2.2. Background ………………………….…………………………… 19 2.3. The Human Dimension of Marine Management ………………… 19 2.4. The Need for Baseline Data ……………………………………... 20 2.5. Policy and Management Context ………………………………... 21 2.6. Market and Non-Market Economics of Non-Consumptive Use … 22 3. Research Tasks and Methods ………………………………………… 25 3.1. Overall Approach ………………………………………………… 25 3.2. Use of Four Integrated Survey Instruments …………….……….. 26 3.3. Biophysical Attributes of the Marine Environment ……………… 30 4. Baseline Data Set ……………………………………………………. 32 4.1. Summary of Responses: Postcard Survey Of Private Boaters….. 32 4.2. -
Chumash Ritual and Sacred Geography on Santa Cruz Island, California
UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title Chumash Ritual and Sacred Geography on Santa Cruz Island, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0z15r2hj Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 27(2) ISSN 0191-3557 Author Perry, Jennifer E Publication Date 2007 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology | Vol, 27, No, 2 (2007) | pp. 103-124 Chumash Ritual and Sacred Geography on Santa Cruz Island, California JENNIFER E. PERRY Department of Anthropology, Pomona College, Claremont, CA 91711 In contrast to the archaeological visibility of Chumash rock art on the mainland, its virtual absence on the northern Channel Islands is reflective of what little is understood about ritual behavior in island prehistory. By relying on relevant ethnohistoric and ethnographic references from the mainland, it is possible to evaluate how related activities may be manifested archaeologically on the islands. On Santa Cruz Island, portable ritual items and rock features have been identified on El Montahon and the North Ridge, the most prominent ridgelines on the northern islands Citing material correlates of ritual behavior, intentionally-made rock features are interpreted as possible shrines, which were an important aspect of winter solstice ceremonies among the mainland Chumash. Portable ritual items and possible shrines are considered in the context of sacred geography, revealing aspects of how the Chumash may have interacted with the supernatural landscape of Santa Cruz Island. andscapes are imbued with different attributes and Conception and Mount Pinos (as examples of the former) Llvalues; whether economic, aesthetic, recrea to sweatlodges and rock sites (as examples of the latter) tional, spiritual, or otherwise, these values intersect, (Grant 1965; Haley and Wilcoxon 1997,1999). -
Island Fox Subspecies
PETITION TO LIST FOUR ISLAND FOX SUBSPECIES San Miguel Island fox (U. l. littoralis) Santa Rosa Island fox (U. l. santarosae) Santa Cruz Island fox (U. l. santacruzae) Santa Catalina Island fox (U. l. catalinae) AS ENDANGERED SPECIES Center for Biological Diversity Institute for Wildlife Studies June 1, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Notice of Petition ..............................................................1 Executive Summary ...........................................................2 Systematics Species Description ...........................................................4 Taxonomy ..................................................................4 Distribution and Evolution .......................................................4 Significance .................................................................6 Natural History Habitat Use and Home Range ....................................................6 Food Habits .................................................................6 Social Organization ............................................................7 Reproduction ................................................................7 Survival and Mortality ..........................................................8 Competition With Other Species ..................................................9 Population Status and Trend San Miguel Island (U. l. littoralis) .................................................9 Santa Rosa Island (U. l. santarosae) .............................................10 Santa Cruz Island (U. l. santacruzae) -
Reproductive Status Assessments and Restoration Recommendations For
Reproductive Status Assessments and Restoration Recommendations for Ashy Storm-Petrels, Scripps’s Murrelets, and Cassin’s Auklets breeding on Anacapa Island, Channel Islands National Park Chapter 1: Ashy Storm-Petrel, Scripps’s Murrelet, and Cassin’s Auklet reproductive status assessments and restoration recommendations in 2011-2012 A. Laurie Harvey1,2, David M. Mazurkiewicz2, Matthew McKown3, Kevin W. Barnes2,4, Mike W. Parker1, and Sue J. Kim1 Chapter 2: Passive acoustic surveys for Ashy Storm-Petrel vocal activity on Anacapa Island in 2011 and 2012 Matthew McKown3, Bernie Tershy3, Don Croll3 1Current address: California Institute of Environmental Studies 3408 Whaler Avenue Davis, CA 95616 [email protected] 2Channel Islands National Park 1901 Spinnaker Drive Ventura, CA 93001 3Conservation Metrics, Inc. 100 Shaffer Rd. Santa Cruz, CA 95060 4Current address: Ball State University 2000 West University Avenue Muncie, IN 47306 Final Report 1 November 2013 Suggested Citations: Chapter 1: Harvey, A. L., D.M. Mazurkiewicz, M. McKown, K.W. Barnes, M.W. Parker, and S.J. Kim. 2013. Ashy Storm-Petrel, Scripps’s Murrelet, and Cassin’s Auklet reproductive status assessments and restoration recommendations in 2011-2012. Unpublished report, California Institute of Environmental Studies. 55 pages. Chapter 2: McKown, M.W., B. Tershy, and D. Croll. 2013. Passive acoustic surveys for Ashy Storm-Petrel vocal activity on Anacapa Island in 2011 and 2012. Unpublished report, Conservation Metrics Inc. 14 pages. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • We conducted a two year study at Anacapa Island to assess current breeding distribution of Ashy-Storm Petrels (Oceanodroma homochroa; ASSP), Cassin’s Auklets (Ptychoramphus aleuticus; CAAU), and Scripps’s Murrelets (Synthliboramphus scrippsi; SCMU). -
Tribal Marine Protected Areas: Protecting Maritime Ways And
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The White Paper entitled Tribal Marine Protected Areas: Protecting Maritime Ways and Practice published by the Wishtoyo Foundation (Ventura County, Santa Barbara) in 2004 describes the ecological and cultural significance of south-central California’s marine environment as a suitable area to establish new marine protected areas or MPAs. Tribal MPAs can be one tool for tribal people to co-manage and protect important submerged Chumash cultural sites and coastal marine ecosystems. The Chumash people lived in villages along the south-central California coast from the present day sites of Malibu to Morro Bay and extended to the northern Channel Islands. The Chumash reference for the northern Channel Islands are Tuqan (San Miguel), Wi’ma (Santa Rosa), Limuw (Santa Cruz) and Anyapax (Anacapa). Limuw means “in the sea is the meaning of the language spoken” while Chumash villages were named after the sea, such as Mikiw or “the place of mussels”. Evidence of Chumash village sites and tomol routes show an intimate relationship with the culture, sea and northern Channel Islands. The map below shows the villages and tomol routes within the greater Chumash bioregion. The varied maritime culture was diverse and depended on the rich array of animals and plants. Many animals, such as the swordfish, played a central role in Chumash maritime song, ceremony, ritual and dance. The Chumash people were heavily dependent on a healthy marine environment; the marine component of the Chumash diet consisted of over 150 types of marine fishes as well as a variety of shellfish including crabs, lobsters, mussels, abalone, clams, oysters, chitons, and other gastropods. -
Island Views Volume 3, 2005 — 2006
National Park Service Park News U.S. Department of the Interior The official newspaper of Channel Islands National Park Island Views Volume 3, 2005 — 2006 Tim Hauf, www.timhaufphotography.com Foxes Returned to the Wild Full Circle In OctobeR anD nOvembeR 2004, The and November 2004, an additional 13 island Chumash Cross Channel in Tomol to Santa Cruz Island National Park Service (NPS) released 23 foxes on Santa Rosa and 10 on San Miguel By Roberta R. Cordero endangered island foxes to the wild from were released to the wild. The foxes will be Member and co-founder of the Chumash Maritime Association their captive rearing facilities on Santa Rosa returned to captivity if three of the 10 on The COastal portion OF OuR InDIg- and San Miguel Islands. Channel Islands San Miguel or five of the 13 foxes on Santa enous homeland stretches from Morro National Park Superintendent Russell Gal- Rosa are killed or injured by golden eagles. Bay in the north to Malibu Point in the ipeau said, “Our primary goal is to restore Releases from captivity on Santa Cruz south, and encompasses the northern natural populations of island fox. Releasing Island will not occur this year since these Channel Islands of Tuqan, Wi’ma, Limuw, foxes to the wild will increase their long- foxes are thought to be at greater risk be- and ‘Anyapakh (San Miguel, Santa Rosa, term chances for survival.” cause they are in close proximity to golden Santa Cruz, and Anacapa). This great, For the past five years the NPS has been eagle territories. -
2002 Volume Visit Us At: Visit
PM 6.5 / TEMPLATE VERSION 7/15/97 - OUTPUT BY - DATE/TIME C W H A L E W A T C H I N G M Y K The waters surrounding Channel Islands National Park Whether you are C are home to many diverse and beautiful species of cetaceans watching from shore or M (whales, dolphins and porpoises). About one third of the in a boat, here are a Y few distinctive habits K cetacean species found worldwide can be seen right here in IslandIsland ViewsViews C our own backyard, the Santa Barbara Channel. The 27 to look for: M species sighted in the channel include gray, blue, humpback, Brad Sillasen Spouts. Your first Y minke, sperm and pilot whales; orcas; Dall’s porpoise; and indication of a whale K Blue whale Risso’s, Pacific white- will probably be its spout or “blow.” It will be visible for many miles on a calm sided, common and Bill Faulkner day, and an explosive “whoosh” of exhalation may be heard bottlenose dolphins. Watching humpback whales. This diversity of up to 1/2 mile away. The spout is mainly condensation cetacean species offers a created as the whale’s warm, humid breath expands and cools Many whales are on the endangered species list and should A Visitor’s Guide to Channel Islands National Park Volume 2, 2001-2002 great opportunity to in the sea air. be treated with special care. All whales are protected by F O R W A R D T O T H E P A S T NPS whale watch year-round. -
Quantifying Seasonal & Historical Shoreline Change on Santa Rosa
Quantifying Seasonal & Historical Shoreline Change on Santa Rosa Island, CA An Environmental Science and Resource Management Capstone Project by Stephen Bednar Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an Environmental Science and Resource Management Bachelors of Science degree from California State University Channel Islands. May 12, 2015 Quantifying Seasonal & Historical Shoreline Change on Santa Rosa Island Bednar Abstract Eminent sea level rise, and historical management of Santa Rosa Island, CA have likely caused a change in the shoreline position of the islands sandy beaches (Stocker et al. 2013). Using ArcGIS and USGS’s Digital Shoreline Analysis System I analyzed net, and annual rates of change from 1929-2015 using a compilation of historical aerial images, and GPS surveys. Seasonal analysis spanned from November 2014 to March 2015 and indicated 79% of shorelines surveyed accreted at a mean rate of 15.17m ± 8.13. 18% of shorelines eroded at a mean rate of -7.06 ± -5.20 over that period. Historical shoreline positions were drastically different from 1929 to 2015. 29% of shorelines accreted at a mean rate of 30.64 ± 29.67 while 71% of shorelines eroded at a mean rate of -26.05 ± 20.69. Shoreline analysis, incorporating aerial imagery while noisy due to many uncertainties, provides a best case management scenario for resource managers. I. Introduction Background Sandy beaches play an important role in society and also provide significant zones of ecological biodiversity (McLachlan and Brown 2006a). They also provide important roles in recreation for humans, as well as ecological functions such as nutrient cycling and buffer zones that protect human development and adjacent onshore ecosystems (McLachlan and Brown 2006a). -
San Miguel Archaelogy.P65
ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THE POINT BENNETT PINNIPED ROOKERY ON SAN MIGUEL ISLAND Phillip L. Walker1, Douglas J. Kennett 2, Terry L. Jones3, and Robert DeLong4 1Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 (805) 685-8424, FAX (805) 685-8424, E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Anthropology, California State University, Long Beach, CA 90840 (805) 965-0262, FAX (805) 893-8707, E-mail: [email protected] 3Social Science Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 (805) 756-2523, FAX (805) 545-0694, E-mail: [email protected] 4National Marine Mammal Laboratory, Bldg. 4, 7600 Sand Point Way, N. E. Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-4038, FAX (206) 526-6615, E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Point Bennett, on the western tip of San Miguel Is- Euro-Americans had on other Pacific Coast pinniped breed- land, California, is the site of one of the largest pinniped ing grounds during the nineteenth century. rookeries on the West Coast of North America. Findings During October of 1996 and 1997, test excavations from late Holocene shell middens situated on and adjacent were undertaken at archaeological sites near Point Bennett. to the modern rookery suggest that the pinniped population Both sites, CA-SMI-602 and CA-SMI-528, suffer from ex- of this breeding area was considerably smaller between 1425 tensive erosion, and the testing was designed to salvage as and 1500 AD than it is today. Archaeological evidence sug- much information as possible from the deposits before they gests that temporal variation in the size and species compo- are lost. -
A Chronological Analysis of Fish Ridge, San Miguel Island, Channel Islands, California
California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations Office of aduateGr Studies 6-2020 A Chronological Analysis of Fish Ridge, San Miguel Island, Channel Islands, California David Faith California State University - San Bernardino Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Faith, David, "A Chronological Analysis of Fish Ridge, San Miguel Island, Channel Islands, California" (2020). Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. 1029. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/1029 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of aduateGr Studies at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHRONOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF FISH RIDGE, SAN MIGUEL ISLAND, CHANNEL ISLANDS, CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Applied Archaeology by David C. Faith June 2020 A CHRONOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF FISH RIDGE, SAN MIGUEL ISLAND, CHANNEL ISLANDS, CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by David C. Faith June 2020 Approved by: Dr. Wesley Niewoehner, Committee Chair, Anthropology Dr. Guy Hepp, Committee Member, Anthropology © 2020 David C. Faith ABSTRACT In this thesis, I discuss Fish Ridge on San Miguel Island. Fish Ridge is an area located on east San Miguel Island that contains numerous archaeological sites. For my thesis, I went to San Miguel Island in the summer of 2019 to collect 18 radiocarbon samples from five sites. -
Anacapa Island Restoration Project Purpose and Need
. CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK . FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT . ANACAPA ISLAND RESTORATION PROJECT Chapter one CHAPTER ONE PURPOSE AND NEED Need Chapter Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN DIRECTION........................................................................... 2 PROPOSED ACTION AND PURPOSE & NEED ......................................................................... 3 Purpose...................................................................................................................................... 3 Need For Action........................................................................................................................ 3 Introduced Species and Island Ecosystems......................................................................................3 Introduced Commensal Rats ............................................................................................................4 Impacts of Introduced Rats on Island Ecosystems ...........................................................................5 Rats on Anacapa Island....................................................................................................................5 Proposed Action ........................................................................................................................ 6 Anacapa Rat Eradication ................................................................................................................6