International Poplar Commission

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

International Poplar Commission INTERNATIONAL POPLAR COMMISSION 25th Session Berlin, Germany, 13- 16 September 2016 Poplars and Other Fast-Growing Trees - Renewable Resources for Future Green Economies Synthesis of Country Progress Reports - Activities Related to Poplar and Willow Cultivation and Utilization- 2012 through 2016 September 2016 Forestry Policy and Resources Division Working Paper IPC/15 Forestry Department FAO, Rome, Italy Disclaimer Twenty-one member countries of the IPC, and Moldova, the Russian Federation and Serbia, three non-member countries, have provided national progress reports to the 25th Session of the International Poplar Commission. A synthesis has been made by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations that summarizes issues, highlights status and identifies trends affecting the cultivation, management and utilization of poplars and willows in temperate and boreal regions of the world. Comments and feedback are welcome. For further information, please contact: Mr. Walter Kollert Secretary International Poplar Commission Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 1 I-00153 Rome Italy E-mail: [email protected] For quotation: FAO, 2016. Poplars and Other Fast-Growing Trees - Renewable Resources for Future Green Economies. Synthesis of Country Progress Reports. 25th Session of the International Poplar Commission, Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany, 13-16 September 2016. Working Paper IPC/15. Forestry Policy and Resources Division, FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/forestry/ipc2016/en/. Web references: For details relating to the International Poplar Commission as a Statutory Body of FAO, including National Poplar Commissions, working parties and initiatives can be viewed on http://www.fao.org/forestry/ipc/en/ ii INTERNATIONAL POPLAR COMMISSION 25th Session, Berlin, Germany, 13-16 September 2016 POPLARS AND OTHER FAST-GROWING TREES – RENEWABLE RESOURCES FOR FUTURE GREEN ECONOMIES Synthesis of Country Progress Reports Activities Related to Poplar and Willow Cultivation and Utilization, 2012 through 2016 September 2016 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This synthesis of Country Progress Reports is the product of National Poplar Commissions’ personnel, FAO Consultants and staff. It reflects the scope and diversity of information available on natural and planted forests and trees of poplars and willows from twenty-one IPC-member countries and three non-member countries. The efforts of the National Poplar Commissions’ personnel are duly recognized for submitting Country Progress Reports in compliance with the general textual and statistical guidelines, which facilitated preparation of the global synthesis. Mr Jim Carle and Ms. Michèle Millanès, FAO Consultants, provided excellent professional services in authorship, statistical compilation and editing services. To all persons who contributed to this publication the International Poplar Commission and its members express our sincere gratitude. iv FOREWORD Poplars and Willows have become significant resources in agriculture and forestry, which are ideally suited for supporting rural livelihoods, enhancing food security, alleviating poverty and contributing to sustainable development. They provide raw material supplies for industrial processing (pulp, paper, engineered wood products, plywood, veneer and other boards, sawn timber, packing crates, pallets, furniture and increasingly bioenergy) and valuable non-wood products (e.g. livestock fodder, medicinal extracts, food products). Poplars and Willows are highly valued for the provision of social and environmental services including shelter, shade and protection of soil, water, crops, livestock and dwellings. They are more and more used in phytoremediation of severely degraded sites, rehabilitation of fragile ecosystems, combating desertification and in forest landscape restoration. As fast growing species, they are effective at sequestering carbon and as carbon sinks, thus contributing to the adaptation to and mitigation of the effects of climate change. Twenty-one member countries of the International Poplar Commission (IPC), as well as three non- member countries (Moldova, Russian Federation, Serbia) submitted country reports in 20161 on Poplars and Willows in indigenous or planted forests, agroforestry production systems and as distinctive landscape components for protective, productive and multiple purposes. Most reports provided detailed information on topical issues, statistics, innovations and trends in Poplar and Willow culture and use. The total area of natural Poplars reported to the International Poplar Commission is over 54 million ha, of which 99% occur in the Russian Federation, Canada, the United States and China where they are managed primarily for multi-purposes (83%) and environmental protection (17%). The total area of planted Poplar reported in 2016 is 31.4 million ha, of which 18.3 million ha (58%) are managed for multi-purposes, 9.4 million ha (30%) planted primarily for wood production, 2.9 million ha (9%) for environmental protection and the balance of 0.9 million ha (3%) is managed for biomass production for fuelwood. The Canada and the Peoples’ Republic of China account for 96% of the world’s planted Poplar resources. The area of Willows is substantially smaller. Of the total reported area of 9.0 million ha of Willows, 95% were natural (8.6 million ha) and 5% (04 million ha) are classified as planted forests. This synthesis report was compiled from the available country progress reports and highlights status, innovations, issues and trends in regards to cultivation, management and utilization of Poplars and Willows. Another purpose is to draw the attention of policy makers, scientists, and producers to the rich diversity of expertise, knowledge and leadership documented in the various country reports. The synthesis report is complemented by a comprehensive listing of reference documents released during 2012 – 2016 by member countries (Working Paper IPC/16), encompassing more than 2000 technical publications. The synthesis report and list of publications are also available on the FAO website: www.fao.org/forestry/ipc. Walter Kollert Jim Carle Secretary FAO Consultant International Poplar Commission 1 Argentina, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Croatia, France, Germany, India, Iran, Italy, Republic of Korea, Moldova, New Zealand, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Tunisia, Turkey, United States of America. v SUMMARY OF HIGHLIGHTS AND ISSUES I POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK In general, it is noted, that the interest in the use of Poplars, Willows and other fast-growing species is increasing, as they combine the goals of bioenergy production and phytoremediation of polluted waters and soils. In the EU Poplar plantations were considered an agricultural rather than a forest crop. The area covered by traditional Poplar cultivation is continuously decreasing due to competition with other more profitable agricultural crops and with competitive Poplar products imported from other countries (Italy). As a reaction to this development, the Italian Poplar sector has launched a number of research programs to develop innovative uses for Poplars and to create new clones with higher resilience to salinity, drought and pests. Globally, many countries and the EU provide tax incentives or subsidies to promote the cultivation of Poplars and Willows. The collapse of the oil price in 2015/2016 slowed the development of the wood biomass production for the bioenergy sector. The adaptation to European policies focused efforts to mitigate climate change including review of the national strategy for renewable energy development by the heating and electricity companies which have stimulated the establishment of Short-Rotation Coppice (SRC) Poplar in recent years. However, the EU regulations needed to revisit the production of electrical energy from renewable biomass production and use of wood residues, including production of wood biomass feedstock from Poplars and Willows to ensure there was an enabling policy framework. Mitigation of climate change by increasing carbon sinks through afforestation and reforestation provided good opportunities for the use of fast growing Poplar species for carbon sequestration and a valuable wood resource for the wood industry. If Poplars are to significantly contribute to climate change mitigation, reforestation and afforestation with appropriate species/clones linked to site conditions, improved tree breeding and silviculture, will be necessary. Biomass production with Willows, Aspens and Poplars on agricultural land played a key role in achieving greenhouse gas emission objectives, including ambitious targets for renewable energy. In some EU countries the conservation and sustainable management of black Poplar has been integrated into national strategies for the conservation of biodiversity and of threatened forest genetic resources. In the EU the generally recognized capability of sustainable biomass production by SRC is not sufficiently supported by regulations and policies. In parallel, research funding for fast- growing tree species in SRCs was massively scaled down as business interest faded and newly declared research projects were no longer approved. Fast-growing plantation tree species such as Poplars provided the raw materials to the wood industries sector as substitute for harvesting from natural forests or imported wood products. Fast-growing trees are considered an environmentally
Recommended publications
  • Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition
    Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition AKA exotic, alien, non-native, introduced, non-indigenous, or foreign sp. National Invasive Species Council definition: (1) “a non-native (alien) to the ecosystem” (2) “a species likely to cause economic or harm to human health or environment” Not all invasive species are foreign origin (Spartina, bullfrog) Not all foreign species are invasive (Most US ag species are not native) Definition increasingly includes exotic diseases (West Nile virus, anthrax etc.) Can include genetically modified/ engineered and transgenic organisms Executive Order 13112 (1999) Directed Federal agencies to make IS a priority, and: “Identify any actions which could affect the status of invasive species; use their respective programs & authorities to prevent introductions; detect & respond rapidly to invasions; monitor populations restore native species & habitats in invaded ecosystems conduct research; and promote public education.” Not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that cause/promote IS intro/spread Political, Social, Habitat, Ecological, Environmental, Economic, Health, Trade & Commerce, & Climate Change Considerations Historical Perspective Native Americans – Early explorers – Plant explorers in Europe Pioneers moving across the US Food - Plants – Stored products – Crops – renegade seed Animals – Insects – ants, slugs Travelers – gardeners exchanging plants with friends Invasive Species… …can also be moved by • Household goods • Vehicles
    [Show full text]
  • Cellulosic Energy Cropping Systems Douglas L
    WILEY SERIES IN RENEWABLE RESOURCES Cellulosic Energy Cropping Systems Douglas L. Karlen Editor Cellulosic Energy Cropping Systems Wiley Series in Renewable Resources Series Editor Christian V. Stevens – Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Titles in the Series Wood Modification – Chemical, Thermal and Other Processes Callum A. S. Hill Renewables – Based Technology – Sustainability Assessment Jo Dewulf & Herman Van Langenhove Introduction to Chemicals from Biomass James H. Clark & Fabien E.I. Deswarte Biofuels Wim Soetaert & Erick Vandamme Handbook of Natural Colorants Thomas Bechtold & Rita Mussak Surfactants from Renewable Resources Mikael Kjellin & Ingegard¨ Johansson Industrial Application of Natural Fibres – Structure, Properties and Technical Applications Jorg¨ Mussig¨ Thermochemical Processing of Biomass – Conversion into Fuels, Chemicals and Power Robert C. Brown Biorefinery Co-Products: Phytochemicals, Primary Metabolites and Value-Added Biomass Processing Chantal Bergeron, Danielle Julie Carrier & Shri Ramaswamy Aqueous Pretreatment of Plant Biomass for Biological and Chemical Conversion to Fuels and Chemicals Charles E. Wyman Bio-Based Plastics: Materials and Applications Stephan Kabasci Introduction to Wood and Natural Fiber Composites Douglas Stokke, Qinglin Wu & Guangping Han Forthcoming Titles Cellulose Nanocrystals: Properties, Production and Applications Wadood Hamad Introduction to Chemicals from Biomass, 2nd edition James Clark & Fabien Deswarte Lignin and Lignans as Renewable Raw Materials:
    [Show full text]
  • Moths Count Newsletter 2011
    16 Moths Count Newsletter 2011 Half Price Membership Offer Why not become a member of Butterfly Conservation for one Moths Count year at half the usual price? Offer available online from 16 th to 3 1st July 2 011 Ne wsl etter 2011 Membership subscriptions are essential to enable us to The NMRS: Pu tting continue all the important work we do to save threatened moths . By taking advantage of this special half price offer you will not Moths on the Map only get yourself a bargain but will also directly contribute to In the early days of the Moths Count project the the survival of these amazing creatures. Moths Count establishment of a National Moth Recording Scheme (NMRS) Contacts was extremely ambitious, particularly as many vice-counties As a member of Butterfly Conservation didn’t have a computerised dataset; records were stored you will receive the following benefits: General enquiries on a card-index or in some cases even on scraps of paper info @butterfly-conservation.org 01929 400209 in cardboard boxes! Furthermore, 34 vice-counties didn’t I New member welcome pack Richard Fox have an active County Moth Recorder. Fortunately, due to I Our exclusive full-colour magazine Butterfly , three times a year Surveys Manager the enthusiasm and willingness of many individuals these I Membership of your local Butterfly Conservation Branch rfox @butterfly-conservation.org 01626 368385 hurdles were overcome. The moth recording community I Opportunities to take part in monitoring and recording schemes Les Hill rose to the challenge of either volunteering themselves for I Regional newsletters and local events Database Manager the vital role of County Moth Recorder or in assisting in lhill @butterfly-conservation.org 01929 406008 the computerisation of hundreds of thousands of paper To take advantage of this special half price offer join online at Zoë Randle records enabling County Recorders to concentrate on the www.butterfly-conservation.org between 16th and 3 1st July Surveys Officer verification of records.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • International Poplar Commission Poplars, Willows and People's Wellbeing
    INTERNATIONAL POPLAR COMMISSION 23rd Session Beijing, China, 27 – 30 October 2008 POPLARS, WILLOWS AND PEOPLE’S WELLBEING Synthesis of Country Progress Reports Activities Related to Poplar and Willow Cultivation and Utilization, 2004 through 2007 October 2008 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper IPC/6E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department Disclaimer Nineteen member countries of the IPC have provided national progress reports to the 23rd Session of the International Poplar Commission. A Synthesis has been made by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and summarizes issues, highlights status and identifies trends affecting cultivation, management and utilization of Poplars and Willows in temperate and boreal regions of the world. Comments and feedback are welcome. For further information, please contact: Mr. Jim Carle Secretary International Poplar Commission Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Viale delle Terme di Caracalla I-00153 Rome ITALY E-mail: [email protected] For quotation: FAO, October 2008. Synthesis of Country Progress Reports received, prepared for the 23rd Session of the International Poplar Commission, jointly hosted by FAO and by the Beijing Forestry University, the State Forest Administration of China and the Chinese Academy of Forestry; Beijing, China, 27-30 October 2008. International Poplar Commission, Working, Paper IPC/6. Forest Management Division, FAO, Rome (unpublished). Web references: For details relating to the International Poplar Commission as a Technical Statutory Body of FAO, including National Poplar Commissions, working parties and initiatives, can be viewed on www.fao.org/forestry/ipc, and highlights of the 23rd Session of the International Poplar Commission 2008 can be viewed on www.fao.org/forestry/ipc2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Poplars and Willows: Trees for Society and the Environment / Edited by J.G
    Poplars and Willows Trees for Society and the Environment This volume is respectfully dedicated to the memory of Victor Steenackers. Vic, as he was known to his friends, was born in Weelde, Belgium, in 1928. His life was devoted to his family – his wife, Joanna, his 9 children and his 23 grandchildren. His career was devoted to the study and improve- ment of poplars, particularly through poplar breeding. As Director of the Poplar Research Institute at Geraardsbergen, Belgium, he pursued a lifelong scientific interest in poplars and encouraged others to share his passion. As a member of the Executive Committee of the International Poplar Commission for many years, and as its Chair from 1988 to 2000, he was a much-loved mentor and powerful advocate, spreading scientific knowledge of poplars and willows worldwide throughout the many member countries of the IPC. This book is in many ways part of the legacy of Vic Steenackers, many of its contributing authors having learned from his guidance and dedication. Vic Steenackers passed away at Aalst, Belgium, in August 2010, but his work is carried on by others, including mem- bers of his family. Poplars and Willows Trees for Society and the Environment Edited by J.G. Isebrands Environmental Forestry Consultants LLC, New London, Wisconsin, USA and J. Richardson Poplar Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Published by The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and CABI CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI CABI Nosworthy Way 38 Chauncey Street Wallingford Suite 1002 Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Boston, MA 02111 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 800 552 3083 (toll free) Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Tel: +1 (0)617 395 4051 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org © FAO, 2014 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation on Turkey's Transboundary Waters
    Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Status Report commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety F+E Project No. 903 19 226 Oktober 2005 Imprint Authors: Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Project management: Adelphi Research gGmbH Caspar-Theyß-Straße 14a D – 14193 Berlin Phone: +49-30-8900068-0 Fax: +49-30-8900068-10 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.adelphi-research.de Publisher: The German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety D – 11055 Berlin Phone: +49-01888-305-0 Fax: +49-01888-305 20 44 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmu.de © Adelphi Research gGmbH and the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2005 Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters i Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 Motive and main objectives ........................................................................................1 1.2 Structure of this report................................................................................................3 2 STRATEGIC ROLE OF WATER RESOURCES FOR THE TURKISH ECONOMY..........5 2.1 Climate and water resources......................................................................................5 2.2 Infrastructure development.........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Estudio De Los Chopos Cabeceros En La Cuenca Del Río Pancrudo
    UNIVERSIDAD POLITECNICA DE VALENCIA ESCOLA POLITÈCNICA SUPERIOR DE GANDIA INGENIERÍA TÉCNICA FORESTAL ( EXPLOTACIONES FORESTALES) EL CHOPO CABECERO (Populus nigra L.) “CARTOGRAFÍA Y ESTUDIO DE LA POBLACIÓN ACTUAL EN LOS BOSQUES DE RIBERA DE LA CUENCA DEL RÍO PANCRUDO (TERUEL)” PROPUESTAS DE GESTIÓN EJERCICIO FIN DE CARRERA AUTOR: Fernando Herrero Loma DIRIGIDO POR: Rafael Delgado Artés GANDIA, 2004 El chopo cabecero (Populus nigra L.) Cartografía y estudio de la población actual en los bosques de ribera de la cuenca del río Pancrudo (Teruel). Propuestas de gestión. INDICE 1. INTRODUCCIÓN ........................................................................................ 3 1.1. ANTECEDENTES Y JUSTIFICACIÓN .............................................................................. 3 1.2. OBJETIVOS............................................................................................................................ 6 2. ESTADO LEGAL ........................................................................................ 7 3. DESCRIPCIÓN DEL MEDIO FÍSICO.......................................................... 9 3.1. SITUACIÓN GEOGRÁFICA................................................................................................ 9 3.2. CARACTERES FÍSICOS..................................................................................................... 10 3.2.1. Geología ............................................................................................................................. 10 3.2.2. Climatología ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Maritsa River
    TRANSBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS Text of the intervention made by Mr. Yaşar Yakış Former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey During the INBO Conference Istanbul, 18 October 2012 TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Cooperation projects with Greece and Bulgaria ‐ Obligations under the EU acquis communautaire ‐ Need for trilateral cooperation ‐ Turkey and the Euphrates‐Tigris Basin ‐ Conclusion TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Cooperation projects with Greece and Bulgaria ‐ Obligations under the EU acquis communautaire ‐ Need for trilateral cooperation ‐ Turkey and the Euphrates‐Tigris Basin ‐ Conclusion TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Cooperation projects with Greece and Bulgaria ‐ Obligations under the EU acquis communautaire ‐ Need for trilateral cooperation ‐ Turkey and the Euphrates‐Tigris Basin ‐ Conclusion TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ 480 km long ‐ Tundzha, Arda, Ergene ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Cooperation projects with Greece and Bulgaria ‐ Obligations under the EU acquis communautaire ‐ Need for trilateral cooperation ‐ Turkey and the Euphrates‐Tigris Basin ‐ Conclusion TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Flood potential
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Annual CAPS Accomplishment Report
    2006 Annual Accomplishment Report of the Illinois Cooperative Agriculture Pest Survey (CAPS) Program This annual report outlines exotic pest detection activities conducted according to guidelines issued by the Eastern Region Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006. The document format will basically follow the outline provided in Appendix H - Annual Report Form. The approved Illinois Calendar Year 2006 CAPS Work Plan consisted of a core program that outlined specific state activities including target pest surveys and maintenance of the CAPS network. Part II of the 2006 program focused on exotic woodborer/bark beetle surveys at high-risk sites in Illinois as part of the National Exotic Woodboring/Bark Beetle Survey. Results of these funded surveys and other survey activities not requiring support are included in this report. Illinois Natural History Survey (Illinois Department of Natural Resources) and Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Illinois Department of Agriculture (IDA) United State Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) Prepared by Kelly A. Cook Illinois Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey (CAPS) State Survey Coordinator Illinois Natural History Survey Table of Contents CORE FUNDING ACTIVITIES ...............................................................................................3 Overview of Results and Accomplishments......................................................3 State
    [Show full text]
  • Scale Insects (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha) in the Entomological Collection of the Zoology Research Group, University of Silesia in Katowice (DZUS), Poland
    Bonn zoological Bulletin 70 (2): 281–315 ISSN 2190–7307 2021 · Bugaj-Nawrocka A. et al. http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de https://doi.org/10.20363/BZB-2021.70.2.281 Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DAB40723-C66E-4826-A8F7-A678AFABA1BC Scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha) in the entomological collection of the Zoology Research Group, University of Silesia in Katowice (DZUS), Poland Agnieszka Bugaj-Nawrocka1, *, Łukasz Junkiert2, Małgorzata Kalandyk-Kołodziejczyk3 & Karina Wieczorek4 1, 2, 3, 4 Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, Bankowa 9, PL-40-007 Katowice, Poland * Corresponding author: Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:B5A9DF15-3677-4F5C-AD0A-46B25CA350F6 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:AF78807C-2115-4A33-AD65-9190DA612FB9 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:600C5C5B-38C0-4F26-99C4-40A4DC8BB016 4 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:95A5CB92-EB7B-4132-A04E-6163503ED8C2 Abstract. Information about the scientific collections is made available more and more often. The digitisation of such resources allows us to verify their value and share these records with other scientists – and they are usually rich in taxa and unique in the world. Moreover, such information significantly enriches local and global knowledge about biodiversi- ty. The digitisation of the resources of the Zoology Research Group, University of Silesia in Katowice (Poland) allowed presenting a substantial collection of scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha). The collection counts 9369 slide-mounted specimens, about 200 alcohol-preserved samples, close to 2500 dry specimens stored in glass vials and 1319 amber inclu- sions representing 343 taxa (289 identified to species level), 158 genera and 36 families (29 extant and seven extinct).
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Passion Fruit
    Color profile: Disabled Composite 150 lpi at 45 degrees 12 Passion Fruit Elen L. Aguiar-Menezes,1 Euripedes B. Menezes,2 Paulo Cesar R. Cassino2 and Marco A. Soares2 1Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Agrobiologia, BR 465, Km 7, Caixa Postal 74505, Seropedica, RJ 23890-000 Brazil; 2Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Centro Integrado de Manejo de Pragas ‘Cincinnato Rory Gonçalves’, BR 465, Km 7, Seropedica, RJ 23890-000 Brazil Introduction important Passifloraceae, such as Passiflora ligularis Juss. (granadilla) and P. quadrangularis Passion fruits belong to Passiflora L. (family L. (badea, parcha granadina, tumbo) are culti- Passifloraceae) which has a wide genetic base. vated in Central America and in the Andean While some species are undomesticated, oth- regions of South America (Kluge, 1998). ers are cultivated as ornamental plants, for Commercial production of passion fruits nourishment and for medical purposes. The is currently increasing due to industrialization majority of Passiflora species are indigenous of the processed passion fruit products to the tropical and subtropical regions of (Akamine et al., 1954; Pires and São José, 1994). South America; Brazil is the centre of diver- Although the passion fruit crop has great eco- sity of the Passifloraceae (Cunha, 1996; Manica, nomic potential, its establishment and expan- 1997). Of the 400 known species of Passiflora, sion have been hindered by various problems. about 50 or 60 bear edible fruits. The majority For example, a wide host range of diseases, of these species are unknown outside their insects and mites attack passion fruit. Some centre of origin (Martin and Nakasone, 1994).
    [Show full text]